Texas State Parks Reservations
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Wilderness Passport
Wilderness Passport Become a Nature Explorer and Discover Careers in Conservation! 2 At Houston Wilderness, we want you to visit and learn about nearby wilderness areas. Did you know that the Houston Wilderness region has 10 different ecosystems? Ecoregions Estuaries & Bays Each time you visit a different Bayou Wilderness ecosystem, put a sticker on your Prairie Systems passport showing that you were Trinity Bottomlands there, just like a real passport. Big Thicket To download stickers, please go to Piney Woods www.HoustonWilderness.org/ Columbia Bottomlands Passport. Coastal Marshes Post Oak Savannah For GGQ schools and participants please go to Gulf of Mexico www.GreatGreenQuest.org We’re Mari and Hoppi and we’ll be your guides! Also throughout this passport you will find out the answers to these and other questions: - What is the longest river that begins and ends in Texas? - How many birds pass through the Columbia Bottomlands every year? - What is the Attwater’s Prairie Chicken and what does “endangered” mean? - What sort of environmental career can I have? 3 College Station Texas A&M University Press College Station Texas A&M University Press Biodiversit A H Ho tlas ustonWilderness ouston of HoustonWilderness y y Biodiversit 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C Atlas of D E F ouston H G H I J 4 College Station Texas A&M University Press Biodiversit A H Ho tlas ustonWilderness ouston of y 7 8 9 10 My Ecoregions Map Estuaries & Bays Bayou Wilderness Prairie Systems Trinity Bottomlands Big Thicket Piney Woods Columbia Bottomlands Coastal Marshes Post Oak Savannah Gulf of Mexico Next to each site is a letter (A-J) and a number (1-10). -
4-Year Work Plan by District for Fys 2015-2018
4 Year Work Plan by District for FYs 2015 - 2018 Overview Section §201.998 of the Transportation code requires that a Department Work Program report be provided to the Legislature. Under this law, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) provides the following information within this report. Consistently-formatted work program for each of TxDOT's 25 districts based on Unified Transportation Program. Covers four-year period and contains all projects that the district proposes to implement during that period. Includes progress report on major transportation projects and other district projects. Per 43 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 16 Subchapter C rule §16.106, a major transportation project is the planning, engineering, right of way acquisition, expansion, improvement, addition, or contract maintenance, other than the routine or contracted routine maintenance, of a bridge, highway, toll road, or toll road system on the state highway system that fulfills or satisfies a particular need, concern, or strategy of the department in meeting the transportation goals established under §16.105 of this subchapter (relating to Unified Transportation Program (UTP)). A project may be designated by the department as a major transportation project if it meets one or more of the criteria specified below: 1) The project has a total estimated cost of $500 million or more. All costs associated with the project from the environmental phase through final construction, including adequate contingencies and reserves for all cost elements, will be included in computing the total estimated cost regardless of the source of funding. The costs will be expressed in year of expenditure dollars. 2) There is a high level of public or legislative interest in the project. -
Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas
Volume 2011 Article 11 2011 Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas Timothy K. Perttula Heritage Research Center, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Bo Nelson Heritage Research Center, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Jon C. Lohse [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Perttula, Timothy K.; Nelson, Bo; and Lohse, Jon C. (2011) "Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2011, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.2011.1.11 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2011/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2011/iss1/11 Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas by Timothy K. -
LONE STAR STATE Stargazing
LONE STAR STATE Stargazing IndependenceTitle.com Keep Your Eyes to the Sky! These are some of the best places to stargaze in Texas Big Bend National Park Big Bend National Park is not only Texas’s most famous park— it is also known as one of the most outstanding places in North America for star gazing. Thanks to the sparse human occupation of this region, it has the least light pollution of any other National Park unit in the lower 48 states. This can be a real surprise to visitors when they are outside in Big Bend at night and see the Milky Way in its full glory for perhaps the first time in their life. Needless to say, you can stargaze just about anywhere in Big Bend, but there are a few spots you might want to consider. If you’re an admirer of astronomy, bring your telescope to the Marathon Sky Park. You can also see the stars from the stargazing platform atop Eve’s Garden Bed and Breakfast in Marathon. Brazos Bend State Park Located an hour outside of Houston, Brazos Bend State Park is a great place for any astronomical enthusiast. Not only is it far removed from the light pollution of the Lone Star State’s biggest city, it’s home to the George Observatory, where visitors can view planetary objects up close and personal. LONE STAR STATE Caprock Canyons State Park Home to the only wild bison herd in the state of Texas, Caprock Canyon State Park in the Texas panhandle has stunning views of constellations. -
SUBCOMMITTEE on ARTICLES VI, VII, & VIII AGENDA MONDAY, MAY 2, 2016 10:00 A.M. ROOM E1.030 I. II. Charge #17: Review Histori
TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE ON ARTICLES VI, VII, & VIII LARRY GONZALES, CHAIR AGENDA MONDAY, MAY 2, 2016 10:00 A.M. ROOM E1.030 I. CALL TO ORDER II. CHAIRMAN’S OPENING REMARKS III. INVITED TESTIMONY Charge #17: Review historic funding levels and methods of financing for the state parks system. Study recent legislative enactments including the General Appropriations Act(84R), HB 158 (84R), and SB 1366 (84R) to determine the effect of the significant increase in funding, specifically capital program funding, on parks across the state. LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD • Michael Wales, Analyst • Mark Wiles, Manager, Natural Resources & Judiciary Team TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT • Carter Smith, Executive Director • Brent Leisure, State Park Division Director • Jessica Davisson, Infrastructure Division Director IV. PUBLIC TESTIMONY V. FINAL COMMENTS VI. ADJOURNMENT Overview of State Park System Funding PRESENTED TO HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE ON ARTICLES VI, VIII, AND VIII LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF MAY 2016 Overview of State Park System Funding The Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) state parks system consists of 95 State Historic Sites, State Natural Areas, and State Parks, of which 91 are open to the public. State park-related appropriations fund operating the sites, the maintenance and capital improvements of state park infrastructure, associated administrative functions, providing grants to local parks and other entities for recreation opportunities, and advertising and publications related to the parks system. ● Total state parks-related appropriations for the 2016-17 biennium totals $375.9 million in All Funds, an increase of $83.6 million, or 28.6 percent , above the 2014-15 actual funding level. -
Parks, Recreation and Open Space M Aster Plan
December 2009 Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Page 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements Chapter 1 - Introduction Chapter 2 - Community Profi le and Park & Recreation Resources Chapter 3 - The Planning Process and Standards Chapter 4 - Needs Assessments Chapter 5 - Environmental Preservation and Open Space Plan Chapter 6 - Priorities, Reccommendations and Implementation Bibliography Appendix Page 2 Acknowledgements City Council Ted Reynolds, Mayor Dr. Robert Kelly, District 1 Gayle White, District 2 Dale Sturgeon, District 3 John Warren, Mayor Pro Tem, District 4 Parks and Recreation Board Ben Oefi nger, Chairman Casey Dugger Jeff LeClair Burt Powell Barbara Robinson Randy Stone Mary Ann Wheatley City Staff Chester R. Nolen, City Manager Rick Holden, Assistant City Manager Max Robertson, Director Parks & Recreation Division Mike Utecht, Superintendent of Parks and Recreation Kristi Dempsey, Parks & Recreation Gina Moore, Recreation Manager Donna Jackson Zimmerman, Director of Development Services Ann Powell, City Planner Project Team Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. Linda Jordan, Project Manager Suzanne C. Sweek, RLA, ASLA, Project Coordinator Cathy Acuna, Planner Michael Kashuba, Planner Raymond Turco and Associates Raymond Turco Page 3 Page 4 Chapter 1 Introduction This plan has been prepared in compliance Standards developed for Cleburne and discussed with the guidelines for park and recreation in Chapter 3. “Our mission is to enhance the quality of life system master plans established by Texas Parks in Cleburne through people, places, programs & Wildlife (TP&W). TP&W provides a variety Preservation of the City’s natural environment is and partnerships.” - Cleburne Parks and of matching grant programs, and master plans discussed in Chapter 5. -
Draft Environmental Assessment for North Texas Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex
Draft Environmental Assessment for North Texas Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex Volume II - Appendices September 2013 Prepared by: United States Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Fort Worth, Texas Table of Contents APPENDIX A A.1 First Early Notification Announcement................................................................................ 1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letters ..................................................................................................... 1 A.1.2 Comments Received From the First Announcement........................................................23 A.1.3 Outreach Meetings............................................................................................................49 APPENDIX B B.1 List of Preparers.................................................................................................................. 1 B.1 Receiving Parties & Draft EA Notification of Availability..................................................... 3 APPENDIX C C.1 Contact Information............................................................................................................. 1 C.2 References.......................................................................................................................... 1 APPENDIX D D.1 List of Acronyms.................................................................................................................. 1 D.2 Glossary ............................................................................................................................. -
Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch
Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Texans Outdoors: An Analysis of 1985 Participation in Outdoor Recreation Activities By Kathryn N. Nichols and Andrew P. Goldbloom Under the Direction of James A. Deloney November, 1989 Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 389-4900 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Conducting a mail survey requires accuracy and timeliness in every single task. Each individualized survey had to be accounted for, both going out and coming back. Each mailing had to meet a strict deadline. The authors are indebted to all the people who worked on this project. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division, deserve special thanks. This dedicated crew signed letters, mailed, remailed, coded, and entered the data of a twenty-page questionnaire that was sent to over twenty-five thousand Texans with over twelve thousand returned completed. Many other Parks Division staff outside the branch volunteered to assist with stuffing and labeling thousands of envelopes as deadlines drew near. We thank the staff of the Information Services Section for their cooperation in providing individualized letters and labels for survey mailings. We also appreciate the dedication of the staff in the mailroom for processing up wards of seventy-five thousand pieces of mail. Lastly, we thank the staff in the print shop for their courteous assistance in reproducing the various documents. Although the above are gratefully acknowledged, they are absolved from any responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have occurred. ii TEXANS OUTDOORS: AN ANALYSIS OF 1985 PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................... -
Lydia Saldaña 817.851.5729 [email protected] Philanthropic Grants
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 22, 2016 Media contact: Lydia Saldaña 817.851.5729 [email protected] Philanthropic Grants Enhance State Parks across Texas Thanks to a competitive grant opportunity made possible by funding from the Meta Alice Keith Bratten Foundation, 17 state parks across Texas will soon be providing enhanced visitor experiences or improved habitat to benefit wildlife. Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation (TPWF) matched the funding, providing a total of more than $52,000 for projects across the state. The winning grants will fund efforts ranging from a monarch butterfly project at Brazos Bend State Park, to restoring a Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) pavilion at Garner State Park, to a shower for sand removal at Monahans Sandhills State Park. All the projects are aimed at providing a higher quality visit for state park visitors. Engaging volunteer labor to provide a match for the requested funds is one criteria of the competitive grant. “Projects that make the outdoors a better place to be is a priority for us,” said Adelaide Leavens, president of Meta Alice Keith Bratten Foundation in Fort Worth. “We’re pleased to support these outstanding projects at state parks across Texas, and we’re thrilled to see these dollars leveraged by Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation and fueled by volunteer support.” The projects that are funded in the 2016 grant cycle are: STATE PARK COUNTY PROJECT AMOUNT Blanco Blanco Wildlife viewing station $5,000 Brazos Bend Fort Bend Monarch butterfly project $2,500 Cleburne Johnson Fish habitat enhancement -
United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land
United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ANDERSON 396 - XXX D PALESTINE PICNIC AND CAMPING PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $136,086.77 C 8/23/1976 3/1/1979 2 719 - XXX D COMMUNITY FOREST PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $275,500.00 C 8/23/1979 8/31/1985 2 ANDERSON County Total: $411,586.77 County Count: 2 ANDREWS 931 - XXX D ANDREWS MUNICIPAL POOL CITY OF ANDREWS $237,711.00 C 12/6/1984 12/1/1989 19 ANDREWS County Total: $237,711.00 County Count: 1 ANGELINA 19 - XXX C DIBOLL CITY PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $174,500.00 C 10/7/1967 10/1/1971 2 215 - XXX A COUSINS LAND PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $113,406.73 C 8/4/1972 6/1/1973 2 297 - XXX D LUFKIN PARKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $49,945.00 C 11/29/1973 1/1/1977 2 512 - XXX D MORRIS FRANK PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $236,249.00 C 5/20/1977 1/1/1980 2 669 - XXX D OLD ORCHARD PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $235,066.00 C 12/5/1978 12/15/1983 2 770 - XXX D LUFKIN TENNIS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $51,211.42 C 6/30/1980 6/1/1985 2 879 - XXX D HUNTINGTON CITY PARK CITY OF HUNTINGTON $35,313.56 C 9/26/1983 9/1/1988 2 ANGELINA County Total: $895,691.71 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. -
Texas Forts Trail Region
CatchCatch thethe PioPionneereer SpiritSpirit estern military posts composed of wood and While millions of buffalo still roamed the Great stone structures were grouped around an Plains in the 1870s, underpinning the Plains Indian open parade ground. Buildings typically way of life, the systematic slaughter of the animals had included separate officer and enlisted troop decimated the vast southern herd in Texas by the time housing, a hospital and morgue, a bakery and the first railroads arrived in the 1880s. Buffalo bones sutler’s store (provisions), horse stables and still littered the area and railroads proved a boon to storehouses. Troops used these remote outposts to the bone trade with eastern markets for use in the launch, and recuperate from, periodic patrols across production of buttons, meal and calcium phosphate. the immense Southern Plains. The Army had other motivations. It encouraged Settlements often sprang up near forts for safety the kill-off as a way to drive Plains Indians onto and Army contract work. Many were dangerous places reservations. Comanches, Kiowas and Kiowa Apaches with desperate characters. responded with raids on settlements, wagon trains and troop movements, sometimes kidnapping individuals and stealing horses and supplies. Soldiers stationed at frontier forts launched a relentless military campaign, the Red River War of 1874–75, which eventually forced Experience the region’s dramatic the state’s last free Native Americans onto reservations in present-day Oklahoma. past through historic sites, museums and courthouses — as well as historic downtowns offering unique shopping, dining and entertainment. ★★ ★★ ★★ ★★ ★★ ★★ ★★ 2 The westward push of settlements also relocated During World War II, the vast land proved perfect cattle drives bound for railheads in Kansas and beyond. -
The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: an Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 266 012 SE 046 389 AUTHOR Paige, John C. TITLE The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: An Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO NPS-D-189 PUB DATE 85 NOTE 293p.; Photographs may not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC12 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Conservation (Environment); Employment Programs; *Environmental Education; *Federal Programs; Forestry; Natural Resources; Parks; *Physical Environment; *Resident Camp Programs; Soil Conservation IDENTIFIERS *Civilian Conservation Corps; Environmental Management; *National Park Service ABSTRACT The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) has been credited as one of Franklin D. Roosevelt's most successful effortsto conserve both the natural and human resources of the nation. This publication provides a review of the program and its impacton resource conservation, environmental management, and education. Chapters give accounts of: (1) the history of the CCC (tracing its origins, establishment, and termination); (2) the National Park Service role (explaining national and state parkprograms and co-operative planning elements); (3) National Park Servicecamps (describing programs and personnel training and education); (4) contributions of the CCC (identifying the major benefits ofthe program in the areas of resource conservation, park and recreational development, and natural and archaeological history finds); and (5) overall