Type 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells and Eosinophil Progenitor Cells Are Preferentially Increased in Lesional Skin of Subjects with Atop

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Type 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells and Eosinophil Progenitor Cells Are Preferentially Increased in Lesional Skin of Subjects with Atop All abstracts are strictly embargoed until the date of presentation at the 2018 AAAAI/WAO Joint Congress J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL Abstracts AB207 VOLUME 141, NUMBER 2 School-based self-management educational episodic ISFP. Median cumulative ICS dose in daily IFP group (45,000 649 interventions for asthma in children and micrograms) and episodic ISFP group (5,250 micrograms) was signifi- adolescents: A systematic review cantly different (P<0.001). No adverse event was found in episodic ISFP group. Kate M. Harris1, Dylan Kneale2, Toby Lasserson3, Vanessa McDonald4, CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant difference in reducing James Thomas5, and Jonathan Grigg, BSc, MB, BS, MD1; 1Queen Mary exacerbation and height suppression between daily IFP and episodic University of London, London, United Kingdom, 2UCL Institute of Edu- ISFP in 6-month period. cation, London, 3Cochrane Editorial Unit, London, United Kingdom, Assessing the Relationship between Age and 4School of Nursing and Midwifery, Newcastle, Australia, 5EPPI-Centre, Clinical Outcomes in Adult Patients Using the London, United Kingdom. 651 ASTHMA-Educator, a Novel Smartphone RATIONALE: Children with asthma are at risk of asthma exacerbations, Application unscheduled medical care and school absences. To date, the evidence for schools-based interventions for these adverse outcomes is unclear. We Brian Hsia1,2, Sammy Wu1,2, Kristine Colon1, and Sunit P. Jariwala, therefore performed a systematic review of the effectiveness of school- MD1; 1Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, 2Albert Einstein College based self-management interventions on children’s asthma outcomes. of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY. METHODS: We searched 19 databases to identify eligible students for RATIONALE: There is a lack of published literature regarding sub- inclusion. The review investigated studies across a range of population populations that benefit from smartphone applications for asthma. This groups and environments, including primary/elementary and secondary/ study examines the relationship between age, asthma knowledge, and high schools. The inclusion criteria stated that interventions must be clinical asthma outcomes in patients that used the ASTHMA-Educator delivered to children with asthma, aged 5 to 18 years, within the school mobile application. setting. Meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the METHODS: 25 adult patients (mean age 53 years) completed the interventions across 11 outcomes, compared with usual care. ASTHMA-Educator program via tablet (iPad) at baseline, 2 months, and RESULTS: 34 studies, from 7 countries, met the inclusion criteria for the 4 months. At each visit, patients received the program and we administered review, and 24 were included in the meta-analyses. School-based in- the Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire (AKQ), Asthma Control Test terventions were effective in reducing hospitalisations (SMD -0.19, 95% (ACT), and Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ). CI -0.35 to -0.04) and emergency department visits (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53 Patients reported the time spent to complete the ASTHMA-Educator. We to 0.95). Days of restricted activity was also lower among intervention evaluated patient satisfaction with the application. We assessed relation- groups (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.41 to -0.18). Children in intervention ships between age, AKQ, ACT, mini-AQLQ, and time spent to complete groups also had higher levels of quality of life at follow-up (SMD 0.27, the program using the Pearson’s correlation. 95% CI 0.18 to 0.36). The effect of the intervention on school absences, RESULTS: We observed a significant negative correlation between age day and night time symptoms, and the use of reliever therapies was less and patient satisfaction (r5-0.37, p50.04). At 2 and 4 months, age consistent. negatively correlated with mini-AQLQ (r5-0.18, p50.28; r5-0.33, CONCLUSIONS: School-based interventions for children with asthma p50.11); at both time points, age positively correlated with time spent are effective in improving a number of outcomes, including quality of life using the application (r50.20, p50.24; r50.17, p50.42). Patient satis- and healthcare use. faction was positively associated with AKQ score (r50.23, p50.21) at 2 Comparative efficacy of daily inhaled fluticasone months. There were negative correlations between time spent and AKQ 650 propionate and episodic inhaled combined score at 2 months and 4 months (r5-0.38, p50.02; r5-0.33, p50.11). salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in children CONCLUSIONS: Older patients demonstrated decreased post-interven- with recurrent wheezing tion asthma quality of life, diminished satisfaction with the intervention, and spent more time using the software program relative to younger Jiratchaya Chamnanrua, MD1, and Tassalapa Daengsuwan, MD2; participants. We will need to validate these findings on a larger scale, and 1Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Bangkok, Thailand, determine how to adapt the program’s features for older patients. 2Samsanenai, Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Samsane- nai, Thailand. RATIONALE: Daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is recommended by the world expert committee to treat patients with persistent asthma and tendency to have asthma as a controller. However, many children in Thailand tend to receive episodic inhaled corticosteroid due to their parents’ inconvenience. We compare efficacy of daily inhaled fluticasone propionate (IFP) and episodic inhaled combined salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (ISFP) in children with recurrent wheezing. METHODS: Forty-four children aged 1 to 15, with recurrent wheezing and tendency to have asthma were recruited in our study. Participants were randomized to receive either daily IFP (N524) or 14-day of ISFP started at the onset of symptoms of respiratory tract illness (N520). The primary outcome was the percentage of exacerbations which needed systemic corticosteroid. The secondary outcome was the monthly height rate. Proportional-hazards regression model and ANOVA were used for statis- tical analysis. RESULTS: At 6 months after the treatment, the percentage of exacerba- tions which needed systemic corticosteroid between 2 groups had no statistically significant difference (P50.790) with hazard ratio of 1.224 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.278 to 5.392). Monthly height rate also had no significant difference (P50.869), 0.66 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.76) centimeters (cm) in daily IFP and 0.67 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.78) cm in MONDAY All abstracts are strictly embargoed until the date of presentation at the 2018 AAAAI/WAO Joint Congress AB208 Abstracts J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL FEBRUARY 2018 Gamma Tocopherol (gT) Supplementation Reduces likely to be female (asthma only), had higher baseline comorbidities, more 652 Endotoxin-Induced Sputum Neutrophilia in Healthy respiratory specialty visits, and higher respiratory-related ambulatory Volunteers and Asthmatics Regardless of BMI or visits (all P<0.05 vs SABA pMDI); no difference with inpatient or emer- glutathione-S-transferase Mu1 (GSTM1) Genotype gency HCRU was observed. Greater proportions of albuterol MDPI versus SABA pMDI users had more severe disease at baseline (asthma: 12.71% vs Amika Sood, MD1, Allison J. Burbank, MD1, Kimberly Enders2, Haibo 8.13%; COPD: 28.57% vs 23.37%; P<0.05), with more asthma exacerba- Zhou, PhD2, David B. Peden, MD, MS, FAAAAI1, and Michelle L. Her- tions (7.64% vs 1.40%; P<0.05) but similar COPD exacerbations (19.08% nandez, MD, FAAAAI1; 1UNC Center for Environmental Medicine, vs. 21.30%, P50.108). Asthma, & Lung Biology, Chapel Hill, NC, 2UNC Department of Biosta- CONCLUSIONS: More albuterol MDPI patients saw respiratory spe- tistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC. cialists and had severe disease at baseline versus SABA pMDI patients. RATIONALE: Through its unique antioxidant and anti-inflammatory Further research may elucidate how patient characteristics (eg, disease properties, gT supplementation has shown benefit in reducing airway severity, comorbidities) influence SABA inhaler choice. inflammation in preclinical and early-phase clinical studies. However, obesity increases systemic inflammation while the GSTM1 null genotype The effects of Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) may alter host antioxidant defenses. This study, therefore, examines 654 dietary supplement as an adjunct therapy for whether BMI and/or GSTM1 genotype modifies the response to inhaled children aged 7-14 years old with asthma: A endotoxin and/or the reduction of endotoxin-induced sputum neutrophilia randomized – double blind placebo controlled following gT supplementation in healthy volunteers (HV) and asthmatics. clinical trial METHODS: Thirteen HV and 15 asthmatics underwent gT treatment Lou Ver Leigh A. Manzon-Reyes1, and Agnes G. Andaya, MD2; 1Uni- followed by inhaled endotoxin challenge in two double-blind, placebo- 2 controlled, cross-over studies. gT supplementation reduced post-challenge versity of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines, University of Santo sputum neutrophilia compared to placebo in HV (p50.03) and asthmatics Tomas Hospital, Manila City, Philippines. (p50.04). The effect of BMI and GSTM1 genotype on response to inhaled RATIONALE: This study amied to determine the effects of Spirulina endotoxin and the reduction in endotoxin-induced sputum neutrophilia supplementation on asthma control and lung function among children aged following gT treatment in each study was assessed using linear regression 7-14 years old. models and Wilcoxon
Recommended publications
  • Oral Allergy Syndrome (OAS)
    Oral Allergy Syndrome (OAS) The itchy, watery eyes, or that sudden tingling, itching or burning sensation in your mouth is all too familiar: it must be ragweed season again! After your soccer game, the juicy watermelon you share with a friend makes your mouth itchy, and you decide that maybe next time you will have to pass on the watermelon. But this is strange: you knew you were allergic to ragweed, but your reaction to watermelon is brand new. Although there is still so much we do not know about allergies, we do know that certain types of foods, or pollen like ragweed, are common culprits when it comes to giving the body an allergic reaction. Allergic reactions happen when a person’s immune system recognizes certain proteins called allergens, as foreign or unsafe. The body’s immune system then triggers an allergic response, like the swelling in your tongue and lips, to fight off the allergen. Oral Allergy Syndrome Some allergies can be much more complex, even downright sneaky. Oral Allergy Syndrome (OAS) is one such allergy. Certain types of fruits, vegetables, and nuts can trigger OAS, but you can also develop OAS even if you were not previously allergic to any of these foods. OAS only occurs in people who have pollen allergies. It is caused by allergens in fruit, vegetables and nuts that are very similar to allergens in pollen. Most only experience oral symptoms, but about 10% can experience nausea or stomach upset, and less than 5% will develop more serious whole-body allergic reactions, such as generalized hives, trouble breathing, or loss of consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrition Perspectives
    Volume 44 Issue 2, March/April 2019 NutritionUniversity of California, Davis, Department ofPerspectives Nutrition and the Center for Nutrition in Schools Magnesium Helps Keep Vitamin D Levels Table of From Being Too Low or Too High Contents If some is good, more is better, right? Not always, Magnesium Helps especially when it comes to Keep Vitamin D 1 vitamin D. Vitamin D plays Levels From Being an integral role in calcium Too Low or Too High absorption and in bone health. Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to variety of Letter from diseases, including certain 2 types of cancer, multiple the Editors sclerosis cardiovascular disease, arthritis, osteoporosis, diabetes, and rickets. On the other hand, too much vitamin D can cause What is Oral toxicity, with symptoms such as GI discomfort, diarrhea, irregular 3 heartbeat, drowsiness, headaches, and muscle and joint pain. Allergy Syndome? Past studies suggest that magnesium supplementation may help maintain levels of vitamin D in the blood in the sweet spot of not too high or too low. Spicy Food May Help In order to understand how magnesium affects vitamin D in Preventing High 5 regulation, researchers at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center Blood Pressure conducted a study to determine how magnesium supplements impact vitamin D levels in the blood. Participants (n=180) that were considered high risk Compound in Pomegranates May of developing colon cancer 7 were randomly assigned to Help Prevent Damage receive either a magnesium from IBD in Mice supplement or a placebo. Over 12 weeks, participants visited the clinic three times Fat Around the Middle May Be to provide blood samples and 8 have their height and weight Influenced by the Types of Food We Eat Magnesium continued on page 3 Volume 44 Letter from the Editors Welcome to a special UC Davis student edition of Nutrition Perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Viagra Purchase
    Current Evidence in Allergic Rhinitis Brought to you by the ARS/AAOA Education Committees Chair Education Committee ARS: Jeremiah A. Alt MD PhD FARS FACS Project Co-Director AAOA: Kristin Seiberling MD Project Co-Director: Elina Toskala MD PhD MBA Contributing Authors American Rhinologic Society: Garret Choby MD, Anthony Del Signore MD, Carrie Flanagan MD, Wayne Hsueh MD, Ian Humphreys MD, Chris Ito MD, Sandra Lin MD, Mike Marino MD, Edward McCoul MD, Bobby Tajudeen MD, Arthur Wu MD, Mike Yim MD American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy: Douglas Anderson MD, Dole Baker MD, Chris Brook MD, Melissa Hertler MD, Mona Patadia MD, Christopher Vickery MD Manuscript ▶ There is a wide variety in the type and quality of the growing literature on allergic rhinitis (AR) ▶ The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR) was developed to summarize the best evidence relating to AR. ▶ More than 100 international authors evaluated the evidence using a structured review process. Section I pg. 113 Introduction ▶ There is a wide variety in the type and quality of the growing literature on allergic rhinitis (AR) ▶ The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR) was developed to summarize the best evidence relating to AR. ▶ More than 100 international authors evaluated the evidence using a structured review process. Introduction ▶ This document summarizes findings of meta-analyses and other systematic reviews to provide recommendations based on the best AR evidence ▶ High value placed on strength of evidence ▶ Similar to the 2016 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR:RS), this is not a clinical practice guideline or meta-analysis ▶ Practitioners are able to use this evidence-based knowledge to provide support for treatment Section II Methods II.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Allergy Syndrome
    ORAL ALLERGY SYNDROME What is Oral Allergy Syndrome? Oral allergy syndrome is an allergic reaction to certain proteins in a variety of fruits, vegetables, and nuts. This syndrome occurs in some people with pollen allergies. Symptoms usually affect the mouth and throat. These reactions are not related to pesticides, metals or other substances. Who is affected and what pollens are involved? Most people who have oral allergy syndrome also have seasonal allergies (hay fever). Older children and adults are the most likely to have this syndrome. You have a higher risk of this syndrome if you are allergic to the pollens of: - Birch Tree - Grass - Ragweed - English Plantain (weed) - Mugwort (sage) These reactions can occur at any time of the year. However, symptoms may be worse during the pollen season. What are the symptoms and when do they occur? Symptoms typically include itching and burning of the lips, mouth and throat. Some people also have watery, itchy eyes, runny nose, and sneezing. Sometimes peeling or touching the foods may result in a rash, itching or swelling where the juice touches the skin. Occasionally, reactions may lead to hives and swelling of the mouth, throat and airway. In rare cases, severe allergic reactions have been reported such as vomiting, diarrhea, asthma, generalized hives, and anaphylactic shock. Symptoms usually develop within minutes of eating, drinking or touching the fresh/raw food. Occasionally, symptoms occur more than an hour later. Are all reactions to fruits and vegetables associated with oral allergy syndrome? No. A variety of fruits, vegetables and their juices (including orange, tomato, apple and grape) sometimes cause skin rashes and diarrhea.
    [Show full text]
  • Allergy and Oral Mucosal Disease
    Allergy and Oral Mucosal Disease Shiona Rachel Rees B.D.S. F.D.S. R.C.P.S. A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Dental Surgery of the University of Glasgow Faculty of Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow Dental Hospital & School May 2001 © Shiona Rachel Rees, May 2001 ProQuest Number: 13833984 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13833984 Published by ProQuest LLC(2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 fGLASGOW UNIVERSITY .LIBRARY: \ 1 ^ 5 SUMMARY The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of positive results to cutaneous patch testing in patients with oral mucosal diseases and to assess the relevance of exclusion of identified allergens to the disease process. It was also attempted to identify microscopic features that were related to a hypersensitivity aetiology in patients with oral lichenoid eruptions. The analysis was carried out retrospectively in the Departments of Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology in Glasgow Dental Hospital And School and the Contact Dermatitis Investigation Unit in the Royal Infirmary, Glasgow.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Oral Medicine
    “Pearls” of Oral Medicine The Practice of Dentistry and Patient Expectations! • Lunesta and Taste Dysfunction Eszopiclone, marketed by Sepracor under the brand-name Lunesta, is a nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic agent (viz., a sedative used as a treatment for insomnia. One of the side effects of Lunesta is an unpleasant taste in the mouth, most commonly metallic or bitter Smell can also be altered • Chlorhexidine Inactivation Morning home care affected most: Therefore, better to have patients rinse with chlorhexidine after breakfast. • Herpes Infectivity and Immunity How is herpes simplex “spread”? Why should you wear gloves when performing dentistry on a patient with herpetic lesions if you are already infected with the herpes simplex virus? Should you and can you do dentistry on a patient with active herpetic lesions of the lips? • Lichen Planus and Candidiasis Treat recalcitrant lichen planus with antifungal as well as with a topical steroid • Tongue Brushing and Halitosis Most of the bacteria causing malodor reside on the dorsum of the tongue Patients can use toothbrushes, “tongue” scrapers and products that mechanically remove debris such as chewing gum, etc. Tongue brushing is reviewed with all of my malodor patients • Prostaglandin Inhibitors and Herpes OTC prostaglandin inhibitors may help prevent episodes of herpes labialis Therefore, can recommend inhibitors such as the ibuprofen products, to start at first symptoms of prodrome or when entering “high risk” times Suggest: 1200 to 1800mgs a day 1 • Lack of Pain and Oral Cancer Oral lesion which “should be” painful and is not may be cancerous ulcer • Sun-damage and Lip Cancer Patients with sun-damaged face need thorough examination of lips (and face!) • Signs and Symptoms of Actinic Cheilitis and Lip Cancer ◊ Erythema ◊ Loss of color ◊ Roughness ◊ Hyperkeratosis (Scale) ◊ Erosion ◊ Ulceration ◊ Induration ◊ “Sore” that does not fully heal • “Sore” Gums and Dental Products Erythematous, sore and sloughing tissue and ulcerations may be due to “irritants” in toothpastes and mouthwashes, such as ….
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Lesions and Contact Allergy -Clinical, Histopathological, Molecular Biological and Immunological Investigations
    S e c t i o n o f Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine Department of Odontology UNIVERSITY OF COPENH AGEN FACULTY OF HEALTH AN D MEDICAL SCIENCES Oral lesions and contact allergy -clinical, histopathological, molecular biological and immunological investigations Kristine Røn Larsen PhD Thesis December 2016 This thesis has been submitted to the Graduate School of The Faculty of Health and Medical nd Sciences, University of Copenhagen December 2 2016 1 Evaluation committee Chairperson Associate Professor, PhD Ana Raquel Benetti University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences Department of Odontology Copenhagen, Denmark Assessor Professor, Dr. Med. Dent. Gottfried Schmalz University of Regensburg Faculty of Medicine Regensburg, Germany Assessor Professor, PhD Anne Christine Johannessen University of Bergen Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Bergen, Norway 2 Table of contents Preface ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………… 5 Financial support ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….. 6 Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 7 List of abbreviations ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…. 8 Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……. 9 Summary in Danish …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……. 11 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… 13 Background ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……. 14 The oral cavity ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….. 14 The oral mucosa ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….. 14 Saliva
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF (Inglês)
    REVIEW 80 s Orofacial granulomatosis and diet therapy* Iris Espinoza1 Jorge Navarrete2 Juana Benedetto3,4 Arturo Borzutzky5 Patricia Roessler3 Ana Ortega-Pinto6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20185828 Abstract: Orofacial granulomatosis is a nonspecific term that contains a wide variety of granulomatous entities, which share a clinical and histopathological presentation. It manifests as persistent or recurrent orofacial swelling, amongst other findings. Idiopathic orofacial granulomatosis, characterized by an absence of systemic granulomatous disease, is a diagno- sis of exclusion. The main differential diagnosis is Crohn’s disease. Its pathogenesis is unknown, however, it seems to be immune-mediated. Patch-test sensitivity to multiple allergens is well documented. Currently, therapeutic options consider restrictive diets, topical, intralesional, and systemic agents. First-line therapy is currently a matter of debate. We present a review of the value of diet therapy in this syndrome, along with two illustrative cases. Keywords: Crohn disease; Diet therapy; Granulomatosis, orofacial; Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome INTRODUCTION Orofacial granulomatosis (OFG) is a nonspecific term en- and benzoate-free diet as first-line therapy. 7-9 We present a review of compassing a group of immunologically mediated, persistent or re- the role of diet in the treatment of OFG, with two illustrating clinical current, inflammatory, granulomatous entities that manifest as soft cases treated with this same modality. tissue enlargement of the lips
    [Show full text]
  • Serum Cytokine Profile and Clinicopathological Findings in Oral Lichen Planus, Oral Lichenoid Lesions and Stomatitis
    Serum cytokine profile and clinicopathological findings in oral lichen planus, oral lichenoid lesions and stomatitis Larsen, Kristine Røn; Johansen, Jeanne Duus; Reibel, Jesper; Zachariae, Claus; Pedersen, Anne Marie Lynge Published in: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research DOI: 10.1002/cre2.91 Publication date: 2017 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Larsen, K. R., Johansen, J. D., Reibel, J., Zachariae, C., & Pedersen, A. M. L. (2017). Serum cytokine profile and clinicopathological findings in oral lichen planus, oral lichenoid lesions and stomatitis. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, (3), 220-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.91 Download date: 02. okt.. 2021 Received: 6 July 2017 Accepted: 16 September 2017 DOI: 10.1002/cre2.91 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Serum cytokine profile and clinicopathological findings in oral lichen planus, oral lichenoid lesions and stomatitis Kristine Roen Larsen1 | Jeanne Duus Johansen2 | Jesper Reibel1 | Claus Zachariae3 | Anne Marie Lynge Pedersen1 1 Section for Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine, Department of Odontology, Faculty Abstract of Health and Medical Sciences, University of The objective of this study was to examine if clinical and histopathological variables in patients Copenhagen, Denmark with oral lichen planus (OLP), oral lichenoid lesions (OLL), and generalized stomatitis display 2 National Allergy Research Centre, different cytokine profiles and if concomitant contact allergy influences this profile. Forty‐nine Department of Dermatology and Allergy, patients and 29 healthy age‐ and gender‐matched subjects were included. Demographic and Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark clinical data immunohistochemical findings in mucosal specimens, results of contact allergy 3 Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark testing, and serum levels of tumor necrosis factor‐α, interferon‐γ, interleukin (IL)‐6, IL‐10, Correspondence IL‐12p40, and IL‐12p70 were analyzed and compared between groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Allergy Syndrome
    Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust Children’s Allergy Clinic Oral allergy syndrome Information for parents What is oral allergy syndrome? • In the common form, oral allergy syndrome usually causes redness, itching, burning and swelling of the lips, inside of the mouth, tongue and soft palate. A child will often refuse the food once it starts irritating their mouth. • Occasionally itching and swelling of the throat occurs. Other reactions such as hives (similar to nettle rash), conjunctivitis (itchy, watery eyes), rhinitis (inflammation inside the nose), asthma, nausea and vomiting may occur later. • Severe symptoms such as anaphylactic shock or breathing problems are rare. What are the causes? • Oral allergy syndrome (OAS) is usually caused by an allergy to certain fruit and vegetables, especially when eaten raw. • Reactions to the same foods when they are cooked are less likely but can sometimes happen. The skin of certain fruit and vegetables can cause a reaction. • OAS is also associated with an allergy to pollen, especially from silver birch, but also grasses, ragweed (ragwort) and mugwort. 75% of people with silver birch allergy will have OAS. Allergic rhinitis symptoms may flare up when these pollens are in season. • OAS can also occur in people allergic to rubber latex. What to do if a child has an allergic reaction If an allergic reaction occurs, the child should stop eating the food immediately and spit it out. Give the child a dose of antihistamine. In the unlikely event that a severe reaction occurs, then dial 999 for an ambulance. page 2 OAS reactions are usually immediate and occur within 1-5 minutes of the problem food coming into contact with the mouth.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Allergy Syndrome
    Oral Allergy Syndrome Oral allergy syndrome is a medical condition in which the person affected suffers immediate allergic symptoms in the lips, mouth and throat, usually when they eat certain kinds of raw fruit, raw vegetables or nuts. These symptoms are most commonly itching or tingling, but swelling may also occur. This factsheet aims to answer some of the questions which you and your family might have about living with oral allergy syndrome. Our aim is to provide information that will help you to avoid the foods that cause the problem and know how to treat an allergic reaction should it occur. If you think you suffer from oral allergy syndrome, you should visit your GP for confirmation of the diagnosis. Most cases are mild but on rare occasions there is the potential for more serious food allergy and so your GP may recommend consultation with an allergy specialist. Throughout the text you will see brief medical references given in brackets. More complete references are published towards the end of this fact sheet. Other terms for oral allergy syndrome The type of allergy described in this fact sheet is caused by a process known as “cross-reactivity” – where the proteins in certain foods are similar to those in pollens. Therefore this condition can also be known as ‘pollen food syndrome’ (Egger et al 2006, Ma et al 2003, Konstantinou et al 2008). In other cases the primary cause is a similarity between the proteins in foods and those in natural rubber latex. In those cases, the term used would be ‘latex food syndrome’.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Pollens
    Tree pollens Allergy – Which allergens? Author: Dr Harris Steinman, Allergy Resources International, P O Box 565, Milnerton 7435, South Africa, [email protected]. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without the written consent of Phadia AB. ©Phadia AB, 2008 Design: RAK Design AB, 2008 Printed by: Åtta.45 Tryckeri AB, Solna, Sweden ISBN 91-973440-5-2 Contents Introduction .........................................................................5 t19 Acacia (Acacia longifolia) .........................................11 t5 American beech (Fagus grandifolia) ...........................14 t73 Australian pine (Casuarina equisetifolia) ....................17 t37 Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) ...........................20 t56 Bayberry (Myrica cerifera) .........................................22 t1 Box-elder (Acer negundo) .........................................24 t212 Cedar (Libocedrus decurrens) ...................................27 t45 Cedar elm (Ulmus crassifolia) ...................................29 t206 Chestnut (Castanea sativa) .......................................32 t3 Common silver birch (Betula verrucosa) .....................35 t14 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides) ................................45 t222 Cypress (Cupressus arizonica) ...................................49 t214 Date (Phoenix canariensis) .......................................56 t207 Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga taxifolia) .............................59 t205 Elder (Sambucus nigra) ............................................60
    [Show full text]