186923 3 En Bookfrontmatter 1..20

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

186923 3 En Bookfrontmatter 1..20 2 CARDIOLOGY Section Editors: Dr. Mustafa Toma and Dr. Jason Andrade Aortic Dissection DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS PATHOPHYSIOLOGY (CONT’D) CARDIAC DEBAKEY—I ¼ ascending and at least aortic arch, MYOCARDIAL—myocardial infarction, angina II ¼ ascending only, III ¼ originates in descending VALVULAR—aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation and extends proximally or distally PERICARDIAL—pericarditis RISK FACTORS VASCULAR—aortic dissection COMMON—hypertension, age, male RESPIRATORY VASCULITIS—Takayasu arteritis, giant cell arteritis, PARENCHYMAL—pneumonia, cancer rheumatoid arthritis, syphilitic aortitis PLEURAL—pneumothorax, pneumomediasti- COLLAGEN DISORDERS—Marfan syndrome, Ehlers– num, pleural effusion, pleuritis Danlos syndrome, cystic medial necrosis VASCULAR—pulmonary embolism, pulmonary VALVULAR—bicuspid aortic valve, aortic coarcta- hypertension tion, Turner syndrome, aortic valve replacement GI—esophagitis, esophageal cancer, GERD, peptic OTHERS—cocaine, trauma ulcer disease, Boerhaave’s, cholecystitis, pancreatitis CLINICAL FEATURES OTHERS—musculoskeletal, shingles, anxiety RATIONAL CLINICAL EXAMINATION SERIES: DOES THIS PATIENT HAVE AN ACUTE THORACIC PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AORTIC DISSECTION? ANATOMY—layers of aorta include intima, media, LR+ LRÀ and adventitia. Majority of tears found in ascending History aorta right lateral wall where the greatest shear force Hypertension 1.6 0.5 upon the artery wall is produced Sudden chest pain 1.6 0.3 AORTIC TEAR AND EXTENSION—aortic tear may Tearing or ripping pain 1.2–10.8 0.4–0.99 produce a tearing, ripping sudden chest pain radiat- Physical ing to the back. Aortic regurgitation can produce Pulse deficit 5.7 0.7 diastolic murmur. Pericardial tamponade may occur, Focal neurological deficit 6.6–33 0.71–0.87 leading to hypotension or syncope. Initial aortic tear Diastolic murmur 1.4 0.9 and subsequent extension of a false lumen along the CXR/ECG aorta may also occlude blood flow into any of the Enlarged aorta or wide 2.0 0.3 following vascular structures: mediastinum CORONARY—acute myocardial infarction (usually LVH on ECG 0.2–3.2 0.84–1.2 RCA) APPROACH—‘‘presence of tearing, ripping, or BRACHIOCEPHALIC, LEFT SUBCLAVIAN, DISTAL AORTA— migrating pain may suggest dissection. Pulse defi- absent or asymmetric peripheral pulse, limb cit or focal neurological deficits greatly increase ischemia likelihood of dissection. Absence of pain of sudden RENAL—anuria, renal failure onset decreases likelihood of dissection. Normal CAROTID—syncope/hemiplegia/death aorta and mediastinum on CXR help to exclude ANTERIOR SPINAL—paraplegia/quadriplegia, ante- diagnosis’’ rior cord syndrome JAMA 2002 287:17 CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS STANFORD—A ¼ any ascending aorta involvement, B ¼ all others D. Hui, Approach to Internal Medicine, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6505-9_2, 25 Ó Springer ScienceþBusiness Media, LLC 2006, 2007, 2011 26 Acute Coronary Syndrome INVESTIGATIONS DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC ISSUES (CONT’D) BASIC TYPE B—with aggressive hypertensive treatment, LABS—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, troponin/CK Â3, 1-month survival >90%, 10-year survival 56% glucose, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, albumin, lipase, INR/PTT MANAGEMENT IMAGING—CXR, echocardiogram (TEE), CT chest or ABC—O2 to keep sat >95%, IV, antihypertensive MRI chest (keep HR <60 and SBP <120 mmHg. Labetalol 2 mg/ ECG min IV loading drip, then 2–8 mg/min (target heart SPECIAL rate 55–60) or 20–80 mg IV q10min, maximum AORTOGRAPHY 300 mg, then 200–400 mg PO BID. If SBP still >100 mmHg, sodium nitroprusside 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/ DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC ISSUES min IV initially, then 0.25–10 mg/kg/min) CXR FINDINGS—wide mediastinum (>6cm TREAT UNDERLYING CAUSE—Type A (emergent [2.4 in.]), indistinct aortic knuckle, pleural cap, differ- surgical repair, endovascular stenting, long-term ence in diameter between ascending and descending blood pressure control). Type B (medical blood aorta, blurring of aortic margin secondary to local pressure control). Monitor over time with serial extravasation of blood, pleural effusion or massive CT/MR chest hemothorax, displaced calcification (separation of the intimal aortic calcification from the edge of the aortic Related Topics shadow >1 cm [0.4. in.]) Acute Coronary Syndrome (p. 26) PROGNOSIS Stroke (p. 299) TYPE A—with surgery, 1-month survival 75–80%, 10-year survival 55% Acute Coronary Syndrome ACC/AHA 2004 STEMI Guidelines ACC/AHA 2007 STEMI Focused Update ACC/AHA 2007 UA/NSTEMI Guidelines DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHEST PAIN DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHEST PAIN (CONT’D) CARDIAC PLEURAL—pneumothorax, pneumomediasti- MYOCARDIAL—myocardial infarction, angina num, pleural effusion, pleuritis (atherosclerosis, vasospasm) VASCULAR—pulmonary embolism VALVULAR—aortic stenosis GI—esophagitis, esophageal cancer, GERD, peptic PERICARDIAL—pericarditis ulcer disease, Boerhaave’s, cholecystitis, pancreatitis VASCULAR—aortic dissection OTHERS—musculoskeletal (costochondritis), shin- RESPIRATORY gles, anxiety PARENCHYMAL—pneumonia, cancer PATHOPHYSIOLOGY Pathologic changes Clinical presentation Pre-clinical Atherosclerosis Asymptomatic Angina Luminal narrowing Central chest discomfort; worsened by exertion, emotion, and eating; relieved by rest and nitroglycerine Unstable angina Plaque rupture or thrombus Worsening pattern or rest pain NSTEMI Partial occlusion Non-ST elevation MI STEMI Complete occlusion ST elevation MI PATHOPHYSIOLOGY (CONT’D) PATHOPHYSIOLOGY (CONT’D) UNIVERSAL DEFINITION OF MYOCARDIAL TYPE 3—MI associated with sudden unexpected INFARCTION (MI) cardiac death TYPE 1—spontaneous MI due to a primary coron- TYPE 4—MI associated with PCI (4A) or stent ary event (atherosclerotic plaque rupture or ero- thrombosis (4B) sion with acute thromboembolism) TYPE 5—MI associated with CABG TYPE 2—MI due to supply–demand mismatch Acute Coronary Syndrome 27 PATHOPHYSIOLOGY (CONT’D) CLINICAL FEATURES (CONT’D) RISK FACTORS LR+ MAJOR—diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, Radiation to both arms 7.1 smoking, family history of premature CAD, Nausea or vomiting 1.9 advanced age, male gender Diaphoresis 2.0 ASSOCIATED—obesity, metabolic syndrome, seden- Pleuritic chest pain 0.2 tary lifestyle, high-fat diet Sharp or stabbing chest pain 0.3 EMERGING—lipoprotein abnormalities, inflamma- Positional chest pain 0.3 tion (" CRP), chronic infections, renal failure Chest pain reproducible by palpation 0.2–0.4 POST–MI COMPLICATIONS—arrhythmia (VT/VF, bra- Physical dycardia), sudden death, papillary muscle rupture/dys- Hypotension 3.1 function, myocardial rupture (ventricular wall, interven- S3 3.2 tricular septum), ventricular aneurysm, valvular disease Pulmonary crackles 2.1 (especially acute mitral regurgitation), heart failure/car- ECG diogenic shock, pericarditis (Dressler’s syndrome) New ST elevation 1 mm 5.7–53.9 New Q wave 5.3–24.8 CLINICAL FEATURES Any ST elevation 11.2 CHEST PAIN EQUIVALENTS—dyspnea, syncope, New conduction defect 6.3 fatigue, particularly in patients with diabetic neuro- New ST depression 3.0–5.2 pathy who may not experience chest pain Any Q wave 3.9 NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION (NYHA) Any ST depression 3.2 CLASSIFICATION T wave peaking or inversion 1 mm 3.1 I ¼ no symptoms with ordinary physical activity New T wave inversion 2.4–2.8 II ¼ mild symptoms with normal activity (walking Any conduction defect 2.7 >2 blocks or 1 flight of stairs) APPROACH—‘‘radiation of chest pain, diaphor- III ¼ symptoms with minimal exertion esis, hypotension, and S3 suggest acute MI. IV ¼ symptoms at rest Chestpainthatispleuritic,sharporstabbing, CANADIAN CARDIOVASCULAR SOCIETY (CCS) positional or reproduced by palpation decreases CLASSIFICATION likelihood of acute MI. On ECG, any ST ",newQ I ¼ angina with strenuous activity waves, or new conduction D make acute MI II ¼ slight limitation, angina with meals/cold/stress very likely. Normal ECG is very powerful to III ¼ marked limitation, angina with walking <1–2 rule out MI’’ blocks or 1 flight of stairs JAMA 1998 280:14 IV ¼ unstable angina IVA ¼ unstable angina resolves with medical treatment INVESTIGATIONS IVB ¼ unstable angina on oral treatment, symp- BASIC toms improved but angina with minimal LABS—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, glucose, troponin/ provocation CK Â3 q8h, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, INR/PTT, Mg, C IV ¼ unstable angina persists, not manageable Ca, PO4, albumin, lipase, fasting lipid profile, on oral treatment or hemodynamically HbA1C unstable IMAGING—CXR, echocardiogram (first 72 h), KILLIP CLASS CLASSIFICATION MIBI/thallium (>5 days later) I ¼ no evidence of heart failure ECG—q8h Â3 or with chest pain II ¼ mild to moderate heart failure (S3, lung rales less STRESS TESTS—ECG, echocardiogram, MIBI once than half way up, or jugular venous distension) stable (>48 h post-MI) III ¼ overt pulmonary edema CORONARY CATHETERIZATION IV ¼ cardiogenic shock DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC ISSUES RATIONAL CLINICAL EXAMINATION SERIES: RISK STRATIFICATION FOR STABLE CORONARY IS THIS PATIENT HAVING A MYOCARDIAL DISEASE INFARCTION? ECG EXERCISE STRESS TEST LR+ ABSOLUTE CONTRAINDICATIONS—recent myocardial History infarction (<4 days), unstable angina, severe Radiation to right shoulder 2.9 symptomatic LV dysfunction, life-threatening Radiation to left arm 2.3 28 Acute Coronary Syndrome DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC ISSUES (CONT’D) DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC ISSUES (CONT’D) arrhythmia, acute pericarditis, aortic dissection, CK/CKMB—rises within 4–6 h, peaks at 18–24 h, PE, severe symptomatic aortic stenosis remains elevated 3–4 days (sens 35–50% at pre- GOAL—keep on treadmill
Recommended publications
  • Diabetes Reduces Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction-Irrespective Of
    European Journal of Endocrinology (2011) 165 945–951 ISSN 0804-4643 CLINICAL STUDY Diabetes reduces left ventricular ejection fraction-irrespective of presence and extent of coronary artery disease Niklas F Ehl1, Michael Ku¨hne1, Miriam Brinkert1, Jan Mu¨ller-Brand2 and Michael J Zellweger1 Departments of 1Cardiology and 2Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Petersgraben 4, CH - 4031 Basel, Switzerland (Correspondence should be addressed to M J Zellweger; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Background: It is not clear whether diabetes reduces systolic left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF) irrespective of coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to compare the LVEF between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with respect to the extent of CAD. Methods and results: Consecutive patients undergoing stress myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) were evaluated. MPS was interpreted using a 20-segment model with a five-point scale to define summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score, and summed difference score. LVEF was measured by gated SPECT and then compared with respect to diabetic status and SSS categories. Of 2635 patients, data of 2400 was available. Of these, 24% were diabetic, mean age was 64G11y, and 31% were female. Diabetics had a significantly lower LVEF compared with non-diabetics regardless of the extent of CAD: 53G13 and 55G13% respectively (PZ0.001). Diabetics and non-diabetics did not differ significantly in the distribution of SSS categories. Diabetes was an independent predictor of decreased LVEF (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.2–2.0; P!0.001). Conclusion: Diabetics had a lower LVEF than non-diabetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Rheumatic Heart Disease in Children: from Clinical Assessment to Therapeutical Management
    European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2006; 10: 107-110 Rheumatic heart disease in children: from clinical assessment to therapeutical management G. DE ROSA, M. PARDEO, A. STABILE*, D. RIGANTE* Section of Pediatric Cardiology, *Department of Pediatric Sciences, Catholic University “Sacro Cuore” – Rome (Italy) Abstract. – Rheumatic heart disease is presence of valve disease or carditis can be still a relevant problem in children, adolescents easily recognized through echocardiographic and young adults. Molecular mimicry between examinations, but the combination of clinical streptococcal and human proteins has been pro- posed as the triggering factor leading to autoim- tools and echocardiography consents the munity and tissue damage in rheumatic heart most accurate assessment of heart involve- disease. Despite the widespread application of ment2. It is well known however that minimal Jones’ criteria, carditis is either underdiagnosed physiological mitral regurgitation can be or overdiagnosed. Endocarditis leading to mitral identified in normal people and might over- and/or aortic regurgitation influences morbidity diagnose the possibility of carditis. Only in and mortality of rheumatic heart disease, whilst myocarditis and pericarditis are less significant 30% patients serial electrocardiogram studies in determining adverse outcomes in the long- are helpful in the diagnosis of acute RF with term. Strategy available for disease control re- non-specific findings including prolonged PR mains mainly secondary prophylaxis with the interval, atrio-ventricular block, diffuse ST-T long-acting penicillin G-benzathine. changes with widening of the QRS-T angle and inversion of T waves. Carditis as an ini- Key Words: tial sign might be mild or even remain unrec- Rheumatic heart disease, Pediatrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Essentials of Bedside Cardiology CONTEMPORARY CARDIOLOGY
    Essentials of Bedside Cardiology CONTEMPORARY CARDIOLOGY CHRISTOPHER P. CANNON, MD SERIES EDITOR Aging, Heart Disease and Its Management: Facts and Controversies, edited by Niloo M. Edwards, MD, Mathew S. Maurer, MD, and Rachel B. Wellner, MD, 2003 Peripheral Arterial Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment, edited by Jay D. Coffman, MD, and Robert T. Eberhardt, MD, 2003 Essentials ofBedside Cardiology: With a Complete Course in Heart Sounds and Munnurs on CD, Second Edition, by Jules Constant, MD, 2003 Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction, edited by James E. Tcheng, MD,2002 Cardiogenic Shock: Diagnosis and Treatment, edited by David Hasdai, MD, Peter B. Berger, MD, Alexander Battler, MD, and David R. Holmes, Jr., MD, 2002 Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias, edited by Leonard I. Ganz, MD, 2002 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease, edited by Michael T. Johnstone and Aristidis Veves, MD, DSC, 2001 Blood Pressure Monitoring in Cardiovascular Medicine and Therapeutics, edited by William B. White, MD, 2001 Vascular Disease and Injury: Preclinical Research, edited by Daniell. Simon, MD, and Campbell Rogers, MD 2001 Preventive Cardiology: Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease, edited by JoAnne Micale Foody, MD, 2001 Nitric Oxide and the Cardiovascular System, edited by Joseph Loscalzo, MD, phD and Joseph A. Vita, MD, 2000 Annotated Atlas of Electrocardiography: A Guide to Confident Interpretation, by Thomas M. Blake, MD, 1999 Platelet Glycoprotein lIb/IlIa Inhibitors in Cardiovascular Disease, edited by A. Michael Lincoff, MD, and Eric J. Topol, MD, 1999 Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, edited by Mehmet C. Oz, MD and Daniel J. Goldstein, MD, 1999 Management ofAcute Coronary Syndromes, edited by Christopher P.
    [Show full text]
  • Systolic Murmurs
    Murmurs and the Cardiac Physical Exam Carolyn A. Altman Texas Children’s Hospital Advanced Practice Provider Conference Houston, TX April 6 , 2018 The Cardiac Physical Exam Before applying a stethoscope….. Some pearls on • General appearance • Physical exam beyond the heart 2 Jugular Venous Distention Pallor Cyanosis 3 Work of Breathing Normal infant breathing Quiet Tachypnea Increased Rate, Work of Breathing 4 Beyond the Chest Clubbing Observed in children older than 6 mos with chronic cyanosis Loss of the normal angle of the nail plate with the axis of the finger Abnormal sponginess of the base of the nail bed Increasing convexity of the nail Etiology: ? sludging 5 Chest ❖ Chest wall development and symmetry ❖ Long standing cardiomegaly can lead to hemihypertrophy and flared rib edge: Harrison’s groove or sulcus 6 Ready to Examine the Heart Palpation Auscultation General overview Defects Innocent versus pathologic 7 Cardiac Palpation ❖ Consistent approach: palm of your hand, hypothenar eminence, or finger tips ❖ Precordium, suprasternal notch ❖ PMI? ❖ RV impulse? ❖ Thrills? ❖ Heart Sounds? 8 Cardiac Auscultation Where to listen: ★ 4 main positions ★ Inching ★ Ancillary sites: don’t forget the head in infants 9 Cardiac Auscultation Focus separately on v Heart sounds: • S2 normal splitting and intensity? • Abnormal sounds? Clicks, gallops v Murmurs v Rubs 10 Cardiac Auscultation Etiology of heart sounds: Aortic and pulmonic valves actually close silently Heart sounds reflect vibrations of the cardiac structures after valve closure Sudden
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment Options in Myocarditis and Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy
    Main topic Herz 2018 · 43:423–430 B. Maisch1 ·P.Alter2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-018-4719-x 1 Fachbereich Medizin, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Herz- und Gefäßzentrum (HGZ) Marburg, Published online: 15 June 2018 Marburg, Germany © The Author(s) 2018 2 Klinik für Innere Medizin-Pneumologie und Intensivmedizin, UKGM und Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany Treatment options in myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy Focus on i. v. immunoglobulins In 2012 we reviewed the treatment op- proBNP) and high-sensitivity (hs) tro- curtain of diabetic cardiomyopathy, viral tions in (peri)myocarditis and inflamma- ponin T or I as cardiac biomarkers of heart disease with or without inflamma- tory cardiomyopathy in a special issue of heart failure and necrosis, respectively. tion can be hidden. But which of the this journal devoted to heart failure and Of note, cardiac MRI is an important factors is then the major etiological de- cardiomyopathies [1]. Now, 5 years later, method for clarifying the presence of terminant? itistimelyandappropriatetotakestock inflammation or fibrosis in addition to This issue also holds true for alcoholic of old and new data on this topic. function and pericardial effusion, but it cardiomyopathy [8]. In these patients, al- cannot substitute endomyocardial biopsy cohol consumption of more than 40 g/day Evolution of diagnoses for establishing an etiologically based di- in men and more than 20g/day in women agnosis [1–5]. For the diagnosis of viral formorethan5yearsisthesomewhat In 2013, experts of the European Soci- vs. autoreactive (nonviral) myocarditis arbitrary diagnostic determinant for the ety of Cardiology (ESC) working group and for the diagnosis of eosinophilic or label of alcoholic cardiomyopathy.
    [Show full text]
  • View Pdf Copy of Original Document
    Phenotype definition for the Vanderbilt Genome-Electronic Records project Identifying genetics determinants of normal QRS duration (QRSd) Patient population: • Patients with DNA whose first electrocardiogram (ECG) is designated as “normal” and lacking an exclusion criteria. • For this study, case and control are drawn from the same population and analyzed via continuous trait analysis. The only difference will be the QRSd. Hypothetical timeline for a single patient: Notes: • The study ECG is the first normal ECG. • The “Mildly abnormal” ECG cannot be abnormal by presence of heart disease. It can have abnormal rate, be recorded in the presence of Na-channel blocking meds, etc. For instance, a HR >100 is OK but not a bundle branch block. • Y duration = from first entry in the electronic medical record (EMR) until one month following normal ECG • Z duration = most recent clinic visit or problem list (if present) to one week following the normal ECG. Labs values, though, must be +/- 48h from the ECG time Criteria to be included in the analysis: Criteria Source/Method “Normal” ECG must be: • QRSd between 65-120ms ECG calculations • ECG designed as “NORMAL” ECG classification • Heart Rate between 50-100 ECG calculations • ECG Impression must not contain Natural Language Processing (NLP) on evidence of heart disease concepts (see ECG impression. Will exclude all but list below) negated terms (e.g., exclude those with possible, probable, or asserted bundle branch blocks). Should also exclude normalization negations like “LBBB no longer present.”
    [Show full text]
  • Diabetic Cardiomyopathy
    4 178 E Levelt and others Diabetic heart disease 178:4 R127–R139 Review MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY Diabetic cardiomyopathy: pathophysiology and potential metabolic interventions state of the art review Eylem Levelt1,†, Gaurav Gulsin1 , Stefan Neubauer2 and Gerry P McCann1 1British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK, 2University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Oxford, Division of † Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Oxford, UK, (E Levelt is now at Multidisciplinary Correspondence Cardiovascular Research Centre and Biomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and should be addressed Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK) to E Levelt Email [email protected] Abstract Heart failure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes contributes to the development of heart failure through a variety of mechanisms, including disease-specific myocardial structural, functional and metabolic changes. This review will focus on the contemporary contributions of state of the art non- invasive technologies to our understanding of diabetic cardiomyopathy, including data on cardiac disease phenotype, cardiac energy metabolism and energetic deficiency, ectopic and visceral adiposity, diabetic liver disease, metabolic modulation strategies and cardiovascular outcomes with new classes of glucose-lowering therapies. European Journal of Endocrinology European Journal European of Endocrinology (2018) 178, R127–R139 Introduction Diabetes has reached epidemic proportions and is now structural and haemodynamic changes are not directly among the top 10 causes of death worldwide (1). Type 2 attributable to other confounding factors such as coronary diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased risk of both artery disease and hypertension, in patients with diabetes heart failure (HF) and cardiovascular mortality even in the (9).
    [Show full text]
  • CARDIOLOGY Section Editors: Dr
    2 CARDIOLOGY Section Editors: Dr. Mustafa Toma and Dr. Jason Andrade Aortic Dissection DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS PATHOPHYSIOLOGY (CONT’D) CARDIAC DEBAKEY—I ¼ ascending and at least aortic arch, MYOCARDIAL—myocardial infarction, angina II ¼ ascending only, III ¼ originates in descending VALVULAR—aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation and extends proximally or distally PERICARDIAL—pericarditis RISK FACTORS VASCULAR—aortic dissection COMMON—hypertension, age, male RESPIRATORY VASCULITIS—Takayasu arteritis, giant cell arteritis, PARENCHYMAL—pneumonia, cancer rheumatoid arthritis, syphilitic aortitis PLEURAL—pneumothorax, pneumomediasti- COLLAGEN DISORDERS—Marfan syndrome, Ehlers– num, pleural effusion, pleuritis Danlos syndrome, cystic medial necrosis VASCULAR—pulmonary embolism, pulmonary VALVULAR—bicuspid aortic valve, aortic coarcta- hypertension tion, Turner syndrome, aortic valve replacement GI—esophagitis, esophageal cancer, GERD, peptic OTHERS—cocaine, trauma ulcer disease, Boerhaave’s, cholecystitis, pancreatitis CLINICAL FEATURES OTHERS—musculoskeletal, shingles, anxiety RATIONAL CLINICAL EXAMINATION SERIES: DOES THIS PATIENT HAVE AN ACUTE THORACIC PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AORTIC DISSECTION? ANATOMY—layers of aorta include intima, media, LR+ LRÀ and adventitia. Majority of tears found in ascending History aorta right lateral wall where the greatest shear force Hypertension 1.6 0.5 upon the artery wall is produced Sudden chest pain 1.6 0.3 AORTIC TEAR AND EXTENSION—aortic tear may Tearing or ripping pain 1.2–10.8 0.4–0.99 produce
    [Show full text]
  • Pregnancy and Cardiovascular Disease
    Pregnancy and Cardiovascular Disease Cindy M. Martin, M.D. Co-Director, Adult Congenital and Cardiovascular Genetics Center No Disclosures Objectives • Discuss the hemodynamic changes during pregnancy • Define the low, medium and high risk cardiac lesions as related to pregnancy • Review use of cardiovascular drugs in pregnancy Pregnancy and the Heart • 2-4% of pregnancies in women without preexisting cardiac abnormalities are complicated by maternal CV disease • In 2000, there were an estimated 1 million adult patients in the US with congenital heart disease (CHD), with the number increasing by 5% yearly • In 2005, the number of adult patients with CHD surpassed the number of children with CHD in the United States • CV and CHD disease does not always preclude pregnancy but may pose increase risk to mother and fetus Hemodynamic Changes during Pregnancy • Blood Volume – increases 40-50% • Heart rate – increases 10-15 bpm • SVR and PVR – decreases • Blood Pressure – decreases 10mmHg • Cardiac Output – increases 30-50% – Peaks at end of second trimester and plateaus until delivery • These changes are usually well tolerated Physiologic Changes in Pregnancy Hemodynamic Changes in Labor and Delivery • CO increases an additional 50% with each contraction – Uterine contraction displaces 300-500ml blood into the general circulation – Possible for the cardiac output to be 70-80% above baseline during labor and delivery • Mean arterial pressure also usually rises • Volume changes – Increased blood volume with uterine contraction – Increase venous
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction, a Major Mediator in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy
    www.nature.com/aps REVIEW ARTICLE Vascular endothelial dysfunction, a major mediator in diabetic cardiomyopathy Maura Knapp1, Xin Tu1 and Rongxue Wu1 Diabetes mellitus is currently a major public health problem. A common complication of diabetes is cardiac dysfunction, which is recognized as a microvascular disease that leads to morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients. While ischemic events are commonly observed in diabetic patients, the risk for developing heart failure is also increased, independent of the severity of coronary artery disease and hypertension. This diabetes-associated clinical entity is considered a distinct disease process referred to as “diabetic cardiomyopathy”. However, it is not clear how diabetes promotes cardiac dysfunction. Vascular endothelial dysfunction is thought to be one of the key risk factors. The impact of diabetes on the endothelium involves several alterations, including hyperglycemia, fatty acid oxidation, reduced nitric oxide (NO), oxidative stress, inflammatory activation, and altered barrier function. The current review provides an update on mechanisms that specifically target endothelial dysfunction, which may lead to diabetic cardiomyopathy. Keywords: cardiomyopathy; diabetes; diabetic cardiovascular complications; endothelium; vascular; heart failure; metabolism Acta Pharmacologica Sinica (2019) 40:1–8; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-018-0042-6 INTRODUCTION Clinical manifestations of diabetic cardiomyopathy Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality Diabetic cardiomyopathy affects both type 1 and type 2 diabetic in diabetic patients. It has long been established that diabetes patients and is characterized by a variety of functional and significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, with structural changes in the heart. In early stages of the disease, left diabetic men being two times more likely to suffer from ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is the most prevalent congestive heart failure (CHF) than non-diabetic individuals and cardiac complication [8, 9].
    [Show full text]
  • Cardiology 2
    Ch02.qxd 7/5/04 3:06 PM Page 13 Cardiology 2 FETAL CARDIOVASCULAR PHYSIOLOGY The ‘basic science’ nature of this topic – as well as the potential pathological implications in paediatric cardiology – makes it a likely viva question. Oxygenated blood from the placenta returns to the fetus via the umbilical vein (of which there is only one). Fifty per cent traverses the liver and the remaining 50% bypasses the liver via the ductus venosus into the inferior vena cava. In the right atrium blood arriving from the upper body from the superior vena cava (low oxygen saturation) preferentially crosses the tricus- pid valve into the right ventricle and then via the ductus flows into the descending aorta and back to the placenta via the umbilical arteries (two) to reoxygenate. The relatively oxygenated blood from the inferior vena cava, however, preferentially crosses the foramen ovale into the left atrium and left ventricle to be distributed to the upper body (including the brain and coro- nary circulation). Because of this pattern of flow in the right atrium we have highly oxygenated blood reaching the brain and deoxygenated blood reach- ing the placenta. High pulmonary arteriolar pressure ensures that most blood traverses the pulmonary artery via the ductus. Changes at birth 1. Occlusion of the umbilical cord removes the low-resistance capillary bed from the circulation. 2. Breathing results in a marked decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance. 3. In consequence, there is increased pulmonary blood flow returning to the left atrium causing the foramen ovale to close. 4. Well-oxygenated blood from the lungs and the loss of endogenous prostaglandins from the placenta result in closure of the ductus arteriosus.
    [Show full text]
  • An Audio Guide to Pediatric and Adult Heart Murmurs
    Listen Up! An Audio Guide to Pediatric and Adult Heart Murmurs May 9, 2018 Dr. Michael Grattan Dr. Andrew Thain https://pollev.com/michaelgratt679 Case • You are working at an urgent care centre when a 40 year old recent immigrant from Syria presents with breathlessness. • You hear the following on cardiac auscultation: • What do you hear? • How can you describe what you hear so another practitioner will understand exactly what you mean? • What other important information will help you determine the significance of your auscultation? Objectives • In pediatric and adult patients: – To provide a general approach to cardiac auscultation – To review the most common pathologic and innocent heart murmurs • To emphasize the importance of a thorough history and physical exam (in addition to murmur description) in determining underlying etiology for heart problems Outline • A little bit of physiology and hemodynamics (we promise not too much) • Interactive pediatric and adult cases – https://pollev.com/michaelgratt679 – Get your listening ears ready! • Systolic murmurs (pathologic and innocent) • Diastolic murmurs • Continuous murmurs • Some other stuff Normal Heart Sounds Normal First & Second Sounds Splitting of 2nd heart sound Physiological : • Venous return to right is increased in inspiration – causes delayed closure of the pulmonary valve. • Simultaneously, return to left heart is reduced - premature closure of the aortic valve. • Heart sounds are unsplit when the patient holds breath at end expiration. Fixed: • No alteration in splitting with respiration. • In a patient with ASD – In expiration there is reduced pressure in the right atrium and increased pressure in the left atrium. • Blood is shunted to the right and this delays closure of the pulmonary valve in the same way as would occur in inspiration.
    [Show full text]