Few Collegians

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Few Collegians Rampart Dam Editorial (Reprinted from the San Francisco Examiner) The California Fish and Game Commission has turned considerable light, and some heat, on the proposed Ram- Alaska. part Dam power project on the Yukon River in The genesis of the project was in the desire of Alas- kans for a fresh water lake larger than the state of New Jersey, capable of producing twice the electricity coming from Grand Coulee Dam. Capable too, as some Alaskans hope, of giving the 49th State a warmer climate. Senator Ernest Gruening of Alaska got the U.S. Senate to appropri- ate $135,000 in 1959 for a study by the Army Engineer- ing Corps. (Ed. note-, to date $1 million has been spent by the Corps.) This is a grandioise scheme. Rampart Dam would be 525 feet high, and would inundate 11,000 square miles. The California commission's interest is this: Eight thousand square miles of the area to be flooded is prime waterfowl habitat. One and a half million ducks, geese and cranes enter the Pacific Flyway each year from the area. The area is big game habitat too; 5,000 moose would NEW SCHOOL AT GRAYLING—The new community of Grayling, on the Yukon River above Anvlk be lost, along with numberless caribou, furbearers and Is progressing nicely, according to reports. One of the new buildings, the all-important school, is small animals. shown here in this photo taken by Grant Pearson, state legislator, who made a trip down the Yu- game i kon River before freeze-up. Pearson says the Gravling citizens, formerly of Hnlikachuk, are getting Major fish runs are involved. The king salmon run OK. Their is by the Alaska State Housing Authority and the along building program sponsored there in 1961 was Bureau of Indian Affairs. —Photo by Grant Pearson 22,000. California has major concern in all these areas, and most in the Yukon River as the from Letter to Editor specifically refuge Tundra Times Gov. Proclaims primordial times of the Pacific Flyway. 40 Leonard St. The Sierra Club has taken the same CLASSIFIED RATES substantially I Foxboro, Mass. This as Art Week as the in to Dam. This is a column inch. It has position commission, opposition Rampart eight I October 28, 1963 lines. are about five words Prime of Dam would be to create There I Dear Mr. Rock: Governor William A. Egan last purpose Rampart to a line. Advertisements are 35 a new is no Please accept my congratulations week proclaimed the first seven and mighty source of power. There quarrel cents per line, $2.80 per inch the | on your first year of publication days in November as “American with that, But the California commission offers first time, and 25 cents per line, certainly. of Tundra Times and your fine rec- Art Week in Alaska.” 1 some $2 per inch second time and after. pertinent thoughts. ord of accomplishment. In his proclamation Governor Send to Tundra Times, Box 1287, You have achieved great results Egan emphasized the part that Art Should such a goal be pursued without adequate Fairbanks, Alaska. in a short time and I am sure that has played in preserving history provision for prevention of wildlife losses? Has full effort vour success will continue and in- and imparting a knowledge of pre- GIFTS been made to determine if the many rivers in Alaska of crease with the coming years. historic man. “Historic Art is often LETS TELL EVERYBODY!” — than the but less to Enclosed is my check ($12.00) for tile sole survivor of lost and extinct steeper gradient Yukon, important Give Christmas to subscriptions one years subscription via air mail cities and peoples,” the Governor wildlife, might offer power sites equal to Rampart Dam? Alaska's Alaska magazine. Sports- to start at the expiration of my said. “Primitive art in Alaska plays i The commission wonders too, where the market is in the Man—$5 a year first subscription. present subscription fwhich was a a leading role preserving to be for f a Rampart power; and if of nuclear 94 year tor each additional year ( Hi ft so I do not know the date.) traditions and culture of this State’s development 1 j or subscription ordered at same The enclosed clipping is from the original inhabitants.” Governor power might not obviate the necessity for waterfall energy, ■ time. We send gift cards. Order Foxboro Reporter for which I write Egan concluded. within the it would take to now! Dept. I, Box 1271, Juneau, I possibly years build Rampart a weekly column after retirement. | Governor Egan's proclamation was Alaska. UF Dam after construction starts. ( I visited Alaska with a group issued at the request of the Alaska from the National Editorial Ass’n. Chapter of the American Artists These are fair questions, asked by properly con- in August. 1959. it was a short but and Professional League, Inc. ducted authority. It is not unreasonable to authori- Whale Hunter and memorable visit. expect tative answers before the are "finalized" as Best wishes for your continued Rampart plans Wife Make Visit the bureaucrats like to success. University Gets say. Sincerely, Disturbance of wildlife resources is no minor To Tundra Times James H. Marsden Russian Kettles thing. The balance of nature is put askew at more peril to hu- Rugged and amiable Paul Matu- 1 The University of Alaska Mu- mans than many realize. No one the of meak, 59, of Barrow, recently came 1 Barrow storm. He is not sure j expects growth seum recently acquired several civilization to with his wife, whether he will go when I stop when the of a to Fairbanks Mamie, | whaling new additions to the Weatherby path providential Nature winter. the spring season comes around. is crossed. But 49, to spend the Collection of Alaskan relics. The civilization must not run over Paul and Mamie have 6 children. roughshod Matumeak is a veteran whale additions, a group of Russian ket- either. hunter. He has taken 12 bowhead 1 Paul is a home movie enthusiast tles, were presented to the Mu- jNature whales during his career, four of I and has several films of life in Bar- seum by Mrs. Rose McCullough of which he took as captain of his own I row. He has films of whaling, polar California. The donation was ar- Few Skin ranged through Dr. G. Dallas Han- Prints Sold at crew. 1 bear cubs, church goers, and other Collegians na of the California Academy of He lost his umiak in the recent subjects. N. Y. Arts Center Sciences and Museum Director Lou Place in Alaska Rowinski, while Rowinski was in Two unique seal skin prints were San Francisco for the Of more than 400 1963 Center PTA to Western Mu- Pacific sold recently at the American In- Copper Student seum Northwest college Sponsor League Conference Oct. 11-13. graduates given dian Arts Center in New York. The Weatherby Collection in- federal jobs in the Pacific North- To Nation’s Next The two art pieces were done by Capitol cludes historical west, only nine were Spring photographs, bas- assigned to John Tingook and Calvin Okollik. The Center PTA kets and a number of Russian jobs in Alaska. Copper is plan- spring, according to Donna Don- cop- Both men are residents of Point kettles ning to send a local native student nelly, secretary of the club. per collected by the Wether- According to a release from the Hope. to while were Seattle Washington, D. C. this coming Purpose is to a by family they operat- Region, U.S. Civil Service enlighten native and Okollik are a Tingook hunters. student as ing fish cannery on the Kenai Commission they were: to actual experiences University When find time Peninsula. of they they work on with lower state and Alaska, Leon C. Getz, electrical conditions, the prints depicting life in the 'Nice Summer familiarize the student with our engineer, Corps of Engineers, and north. They do whales, polar bears, seat of Rondal C. Hogan, teacher for BIA, government. seal and other Haines Cutoff To Kotzebue: Southern hunters, northern This Winter' “It is one thing to read about our Oregon College of subjects. great and wonderful country, but to Education, David L. Dickerson, Interior Alaska was blessed with Be administrative The American Indian Arts Cen- many of our native population who Kept Open assistant, Forest a beautiful fall this year. Clear ter is operated by the Association have seen nothing larger than An- Service, Juneau; Central Washing- | days, golden blue all The Haines cut-off, from the on American Indian leaves, skies, it is ton College, Dean T. Smith, admin- Affairs, Inc., chorage, very difficudt to con- Alaskan in the type of weather conditions that Highway Yukon Terri- istrative an organization that dedicates it- ceive of such marvels as will be assistant, Forest Service, tory, to the Alaska of are usually only found on calendar port city Sitka; Pacific Lutheran self to help the Indians and Eski- encountered on a tour of our capi- Haines, will be University, paintings. Even the cold of winter kept open this win- Mr. mos on their economic and other tol, a PTA announcement stated. and Mrs. Lorance O. Schoen- held off for a ter on an experimental basis, ac- long time. berg, teachers for BIA, problems. The student will be chosen not to Barrow; The nice fall followed a poor sum- cording Gov. William A. Egan. scholastic University of Washington, John B. mer however. The only by standard, but summer was Arthur Liang, minister of north- forester U Forest also personality and ability to con- Matheies, Service, marred by recur- ern affairs Who are some interesting closely spaced, and natural resources Chugach Forest, Donald L.
Recommended publications
  • Hydroelectric Alternatives for the Alaska Rai I Bel T
    Hydroelectric Alternatives For The Alaska Rai I bel t ulId,Wildlif:) <J... RECEIVED U.S. Department Of Energy Alaska Power Administration Juneau, Alaska, 99802 TK ARLIS 1424 AJaskaResources .M & A2515 Library Information Services 1980 Anchorage. AJaska Additional copies of this report are available from:- Alaska Power Administration P.O. Box 50 Juneau, Alaska 99802 T/< ILf2Lf 0. /I If II ;)515 /QfO HYDROELECTRIC ALTERNATIVES FOR THE ALASKA.. RAILBELT February 1980 ARLIS Alaska Resources Library & Information Services JUachorage.Alaska U.S. Department of Energy Alaska Power Administration Juneau, Alaska 99802 CONTENTS TITLE PAGE NO. PART I INTRODUCTION. 1 ~y PART II •• "•.•• . ,; . 2 PART III PREVIOUS STUDIES •. ". .... .. ". ... ..... 3 PART IV HYDROELECTRIC POWER INVENTORY • 6 PART V ALTERNATIVE HYDROEtECTRIC PLANS • 9 Bases of Comparison ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ••• ~ 9 Power Demands~ ~ ~ ..... ~ • ~ ••• 10 Costs'.. oi ...... •. "•• -..... .. ~ 10 Land Use and Management~ ••••••••••• 11 Environmental Aspects. ._,. ••• ~ • .. ••• .. • ~ 11 Larger Capacity Single Sites. •_ ~ •••• ~ ~ •• ~ 11- Combinations o-f, Smaller Sites by Geographic Area~ • •• i2 Combinations of 'the Most Economical Smaller Sites • ~ • 18 The "Small" Hydro Approach. ~ ;; •• ~ •• ~ ~ .'•••• 19 APPENDIX~ 20 A~ Inventory of Potential Hydroelectric-Sites in Alaska .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ • 20 B. Map of Potential Hydroelectric Sites in Alaska .. .. .. .. .. • .. .. .. .. • .. .. .. .- .. .. 24 C~ Description of Small Capacity Sites Within 'Geographic Areas~
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: the First 50, a Historic Symposium
    Edited by: Steve Chase and Mark Madison 2 Acknowledgments and Sponsors Arctic 50th Historical Special thanks to: Clayton McBride Symposium Planning Team Todd Harless Geoff Haskett, LaVerne Smith, Keith Mantheiy Jay Slack, Director, National and Todd Logan, U.S Fish and Thelma Flynn Conservation Training Center, Wildlife Service, Region 7, Mike Beth Ann Ring U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Boylan, Richard Voss, Larry Bell Laura Creamer Becky Edgar Steve Chase, Chief, Division of Marca Piehuta Education Outreach, National Georgia Jeppesen Conservation Training Center, Sponsors Dawn Lagrotteria U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alicha Burlett Kerrick Reisbig Dr. Mark Madison, Service Historian, National Conservation Gail Testa National Conservation Training Training Center Andrew Weinberg Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service George Krull Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Ben German Jimmy Fox, Region 7, U.S. Tara Lowe Fish and Wildlife Service The Conservation Fund Cynthia Fraula-Hahn David Klinger Maureen Clark, Arctic 50th Voices of the South Shepherd University Department of Coordinator, Region 7, U.S. Contemporary Art and Theater Fish and Wildlife Service Patrick Wallace American Conservation Film Festival Sarah Gannon-Nagle, Strategic And for their efforts and support NCTC ARAMARK Staff Communications Manager, National of this symposium, thanks to: NCTC Raven Services Staff Conservation Training Center, NCTC Security Staff U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service All of our speakers Jay Slack Thelma Flynn, Event Planner, Jim Willis National Conservation Training Kelly Kennedy Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Rollie Jacobs Beth Stevens Dr. Jim Siegel, National Christine Eustis Conservation Training Center, Karin Christensen U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of International Law with Respect to Trans-Boundary Water Resouces: Co-Operation for Mutual Advantage Or Continentalism's Thin Edge of the Wedge? I
    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 2 Volume 9, Number 2 (November 1971) The evelopmeD nt of International Law with Respect to Trans-Boundary Water Resources: Co- operation for Mutual Advantage or Continentalism's Thin dE ge of the Wedge I. A. McDougall Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Article Citation Information McDougall, I. A.. "The eD velopment of International Law with Respect to Trans-Boundary Water Resources: Co-operation for Mutual Advantage or Continentalism's Thin dE ge of the Wedge." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 9.2 (1971) : 261-311. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol9/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. The Development of International Law with Respect to Trans-Boundary Water Resouces: Co-operation for Mutual Advantage or Continentalism's Thin Edge of the Wedge? I. A. McDOUGALL* INTRODUCION The proposition to be tested by this paper has been summarized as follows: 'There is no doubt that the International Joint Commission has successfully discharged the high functions entrusted to it by the Boundary Waters Treaty. It has acted successfully as judge, advisor and administrator for two great neighbours during a period of unparalleled expansion when conflicts of interest were bound to arise. In playing its triple role the Commission has developed techniques of continuous consultation which are a model for the world..
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Hydroelectric Power in Alaska: Rampart and Devil Canyon -A Case Study
    THE POLITICS OF HYDROELECTRIC POWER IN ALASKA: RAMPART AND DEVIL CANYON -A CASE STUDY INSTITUTE OF WATER RESOURCES University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 G-B {psI .A,/-3 n~.8'7 The Politics of Hydroelectric Power in Alaska: Rampart and Devil Canyon--A C~se Study Completion Report OWRT Agreement No. 14-34-0001-7003 Project No. A-060-ALAS Cl aus - M. Naske and Will iam R. Hunt Institute of Water Resources University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 The work upon which this completion report is based was supported by funds provided by the U. S. Department of the Interior, Office of Water Research and Technology as authorized under the Water Resources Research Act of 1964, Public Law 88-379, as amended. ARLIS January 1978 IWR-87 Alaska ResoutbM Library & Information ~€rViee§ AnchoraS1e' .. A1Mlea TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .... 1 EKLUTNA. ~ . 2 RAMPART DAM. 3 The Corps Promotes Rampart. .... 4 Bureau of Reclamation Competes. .. 6 Market Study..... 8 Gruening's ~eadership . 9 An Alternative? ....• 11 Market Favorable. .. 13 Division of Responsibility.... 13 Yukon Power for America .... • . 14 SUSITNA (DEVIL CANYON) .. 22 Energy Crisis. ... 26 Agency Involvement... 27 CONCLUSIONS. ............. 41 NOTES. .............. 43 APPENDIX .. 47 EKLUTNA. .... 48 APPENDIX NOTES 58 ii INTRODUCTION Hydroelectric power in Alaska has had a curious history--and an instructive one. This study focuses on three separate projects: Eklutna, Rampart, and Devil Canyon. The Eklutna project functions today; Rampart was not constructed; and the Devil Canyon project is still in the planning stage. Yet for all their differences in location, goals, and fate, the projects were related; and, taken together, their histories highlight all the essential political elements involved in hydroelectric power construction.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Starker Leopold Papers, Circa 1925-1983
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8st7rwb No online items Finding Aid to the A. Starker Leopold papers, circa 1925-1983 Processed by Lara Michels The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 2014 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the A. Starker BANC MSS 81/61 c 1 Leopold papers, circa 1925-1983 Finding Aid to the A. Starker Leopold papers, circa 1925-1983 Collection number: BANC MSS 81/61 c The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Processed by: Lara Michels © 2014 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: A. Starker Leopold papers, Date (inclusive): circa 1925-1983 Collection Number: BANC MSS 81/61 c Creator: Leopold, A. Starker (Aldo Starker), 1913-1983 Extent: Number of containers: 19 cartons, 10 volumes, 3 boxes, 2 oversize boxes, 1 negative box (linear feet: 30) Repository: The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California 94720-6000 Physical Location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Abstract: The papers of Aldo Starker Leopold (1913-1983), a University of California, Berkeley wildlife biologist who made substantial contributions in the fields of ornithology, wildlife management and conservation, and public policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorological Conditions for the Probable Maximum Flood on the Yukon River Above Rampart, Alas~A
    HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL REPORT NO. 42 - Meteorological Conditions for the Probable Maximum Flood on the Yukon River Above Rampart, Alas~a U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE SERVICES ADMINISTRATION WEATHER BUREAU Washington May 1966 HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL REPORTS (Nos. 6-22 Numbered Retroactively) *No·. 1. Maximum possible precipitation over the Ompompanoosuc Basin above Union Village, Vt. 1943. *No. 2. Maximum possible precipitation over the Ohio River Basin above Pittsburgh, Pa. 1942. *No. 3. Maximum possible· precipitation over the Sacramento Basin of California. 1943. *No. 4. Maximum possible-pre'cipitation over the Panama Camil Basin. 1943. *No. 5. Thunderstorm rainfall. 1947. *No. 6. A preliminary report on the probable occurrence of excessive precipitation over Fort Supply Basin, Okla. 1938, *No. 7. Worst probable meteorological condition on Mill Creek, Butler and Hamilton Counties, Ohio. 1937. (Unpub- lished.) Supplement, 1938. · .,-· *No. 8. A hydrometeorological analysis of possible maximum precipitation over St. Francis River Basin above· Wappa- pello, Mo. 1938. · *No. 9. A report on the possible occurrence of maximum precipitation over White River Basin above Mud Mountain Dam site, .Wash. 1939. *No. 10. Maximum possible rainfall over the Arkansas River Basin above Caddoa; Colo. 1939. Supplement, 1939 .. *No. 11. ·A preliminary report on the maximum possible precipitation over the Dorena, Cottage Grove, and Fern Ridge Basins in the ·willamette Bashi, Oreg. 1939. · · *No. 12. Maximum possible precipitation over the Red River Basin above Denison, Tex. 1939. *No. 13. A report on the. maximum possible precipitation over Cherry Creek Basin in Colorado. 1940. *No. 14. The frequency .of flood-producing rainfall over the Pajaro River Basin in California.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol38 No1 Spring 2010
    Volume 38, No. 1 Quarterly of the Alaska Historical Society Sping 2010 Alaska Historical Society 2010 Conference Call for Papers Energizing Alaska ndividuals interested in Alaska history are invited to submit Alaska Historical Society 2010 Conference proposals for papers, panels, and poster sessions for the Student and Emerging Professional Travel Awards Alaska Historical Society annual meeting and conference. I The society’s 2010 annual meeting, held in association with The Alaska Historical Society offers two travel awards for a post- Museums Alaska and the Tanana-Yukon Historical Society, will be secondary student and an emerging professional to attend its annual September 15-18 at Fairbanks. The theme isEnergizing Alaska. meeting. This year the meeting will be in Fairbanks, September 15-18, 2010. Each award will consist of reimbursement for documented As a frontier state that is rich in natural resources and experiences some travel expenses up to $750 and a conference registration package. of the most extreme environmental and climatic conditions in the world, Eligibility: An applicant must be a 2010 member of the Alaska Alaska has always had a unique relationship with energy. Some connections Historical Society at the time of applying. Student applicants must are obvious: Prudhoe Bay, the pipeline, the proposed Rampart Dam, be graduate students or upper-division undergraduates in spring or the Amchitka underground nuclear blasts, and the development of fall 2010 with a course of study related to Alaska history. Emerging infrastructure to bring heat and power to communities off the road professional applicants must be employed in Alaska historical or network. Several key elements in the long history of Alaska’s indigenous cultural work and have been so employed for less than five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon and Kuskokwim Whitefish Strategic Plan
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Whitefish Biology, Distribution, and Fisheries in the Yukon and Kuskokwim River Drainages in Alaska: a Synthesis of Available Information Alaska Fisheries Data Series Number 2012-4 Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office Fairbanks, Alaska May 2012 The Alaska Region Fisheries Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service conducts fisheries monitoring and population assessment studies throughout many areas of Alaska. Dedicated professional staff located in Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Kenai Fish and Wildlife Offices and the Anchorage Conservation Genetics Laboratory serve as the core of the Program’s fisheries management study efforts. Administrative and technical support is provided by staff in the Anchorage Regional Office. Our program works closely with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and other partners to conserve and restore Alaska’s fish populations and aquatic habitats. Our fisheries studies occur throughout the 16 National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska as well as off- Refuges to address issues of interjurisdictional fisheries and aquatic habitat conservation. Additional information about the Fisheries Program and work conducted by our field offices can be obtained at: http://alaska.fws.gov/fisheries/index.htm The Alaska Region Fisheries Program reports its study findings through the Alaska Fisheries Data Series (AFDS) or in recognized peer-reviewed journals. The AFDS was established to provide timely dissemination of data to fishery managers and other technically oriented professionals, for inclusion in agency databases, and to archive detailed study designs and results for the benefit of future investigations. Publication in the AFDS does not preclude further reporting of study results through recognized peer-reviewed journals.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Alaska's Mega Projects
    A History of Alaska’s Mega Projects For the Alaska Conservation Alliance with funds provided by the Alaska Conservation Foundation June 2003 By Ginny Fay, EcoSystems: Economic and Ecological Research 1101 Potlatch Circle Anchorage, Alaska 99503 907/ 333-3568 email: ginnyfay@montana. com Alaska Mega Projects Executive Summary In the 1980s when oil prices were high and the State of Alaska was awash in windfall revenues, the State ventured into a number of large scale infrastructure projects— predominantly agriculture and energy projects. This report gives an overview of the history, costs and benefits of some of the mega projects undertaken by the State of Alaska. Fueled by the flow of oil dollars, Alaska launched into expanding the agricultural sector in the late 1970s. The Legislative Finance Division estimated that $112 million ($192 million 2002 $$) had been appropriated to fund agricultural projects in Alaska from 1978 to 1981. The predominant agricultural projects were the Delta Agricultural Project (Delta I and Delta II), the Seward grain terminal and accompanying railroad cars, Point McKenzie Project, the Agricultural Revolving Loan Fund, and a variety of projects at the University of Alaska Fairbanks and rural agricultural projects. Similar to agriculture, Alaska entered the arena of energy projects on a big scale. In the late 1970s as oil prices rose as a result of the OPEC energy embargo, State coffers swelled while simultaneously, ratepayers’ oil generated electrical power rates climbed. Alaska’s approach to energy project development was to use the windfall oil revenues from high prices to finance electrical projects that would be immune to oil price fluctuations, renewable and sustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • A Supplement to the Special Report Downstream Effects of Rampart Project on Fish and Wildlife Resources
    lOOt Statement on Fishery Resources A Supplement to the Special Report Downstream Effects of Rampart Project on Fish and Wildlife Resources WITHOUT THE PROJECT Species present 1. The species of fish that occur in the Yukon River and its tributaries are known in general. Similar qualitative information is also available for some of the lakes within the proposed reservoir area as a result of limited reconnaissance work conducted in July 1962. Virtually the only quantitative data available on the Yukon fish resources, however, relate to the abundance and timing of chinook and chum salmon runs past the damsite and to catches of the subsistence and commercial fisheries. z. The following fish species were found in waters within the proposed reservoir area. This list appears in the Fish and Wildlife report on the project!!. Large whitefish spp. Least cisco Chum salmon Coho salmon Chinook salmon Round whitefish Inconnu Arctic grayling Northern pike Lake chub Longnose sucker Burbot Trout-perch Sculpin 3. Although similar information is not available for waters of the Yukon basin downstream from the Rampart damsite, all of the species listed above probably occur in that area also. In addition, the lower Yukon basin is known 1/ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1964. Rampart Canyon Dam and Reservoir Project, Yukon River, Alaska. A Report on fish and wildlife resources, Juneau, Alaska (processed) p. ~J·Jolv~~")'''''- :·. 1' ; /\. .:s;.::;Ti ~ •·: ;\! h := ;iMATION ' to sustain populations of Dolly Varden, ninespine stickleback, Alaska blackfish, lampreys, smelt, and sockeye and pink salmon. Most of these species occur in the mainstem river and many have also been found in the tributary streams and in lakes lying on the floodplain.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 29/09/2021 03:36:50
    The Politics of Hydroelectric Power in Alaska: Rampart and Devil Canyon -- A Case Study Item Type Technical Report Authors Naske, Claus-M.; Hunt, William R. Publisher University of Alaska, Institute of Water Resources Download date 29/09/2021 03:36:50 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/1817 The Politics of Hydroelectric Power in Alaska: Rampart and Devil Canyon--A Case Study Completion Report DWRT Agreement No. 14-34-0001-7003 Project No. A-060-ALAS Cl aus - M. Naske and William R. Hunt Institute of Water Resources University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 The work upon which this completion report is based was supported by funds provided by the U. S. Department of the Interior, Office of Water Research and Technology as authorized under the Water Resources Research Act of 1964, Public Law 88-379, as amended. IWR-87 Janua ry 1978 Revised October 1978 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 EKLUTNA ... 2 RAMPART DAM. 3 The Corps Promotes Rampart. 4 Bureau of Reclamation Competes. 6 Market Study..... 8 Gruening's Leadership 9 An Alternative? . 11 Market Favorable . 13 Division of Responsibility. 13 Yukon Power for America 14 SUSITNA (DEVIL CANYON) . 22 Energy Crisis ... 26 Agency Involvement. 27 CONCLUSIONS. 41 NOTES .. 43 APPENDIX .. 47 EKLUTNA. .. 48 APPENDIX NOTES 58 i i INTRODUCTION Hydroelectric power in Alaska has had a curious history--and an instructive one. This study focuses on three separate projects: Eklutna, Rampart, and Devil Canyon. The Eklutna project functions today; Rampart was not constructed; and the Devil Canyon project is still in the planning stage. Yet for all their differences in location, goals, and fate, the projects were related; and, taken together, their histories highlight all the essential political elements involved in hydroelectric power construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Opportunities and Needs in the Taiga of Alaska
    1973 USDA FOREST SERVICE GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-2 RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES AND NEEDS IN THE TAIGA OF ALASKA This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. AUSTIN E. HELMERS AND CHARLES T. CUSHWA PACIFIC NORTHWEST FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION US. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE PORTLAND, OREGON ABSTRACT An appraisal of taiga (the northern forests of interior Alaska) environment research opportunities and needs was made based upon accomplishments since Alaskan statehood, current involvement of citizens in resource issues, information needs incident to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and needs of new resource manag- ing agencies and changing ownerships brought about by statehood and the settlement of aboriginal land claims. Based upon this appraisal, it is proposed that the research needs can best be met through a multidisciplinary interagency program. The program suggests closer coordination among several departments of the University of Alaska and a number of State and Federal agencies currently involved in applicable research. The urgency of research implementation is related to rapid change and diminishing opportunity to insure orderly development of Alaskas resources. Taiga environment information needs encompass five major problem areas: Ecology--the fundamental climate-soil-water-air-flora-fauna relationships in natural and perturbed environmental systems. Fire effects--characteristics of fire, fire ecology, and the effects of fire upon entire resource systems. Water--precipitation-soil-plant-runoff relationships are com- plicated by permafrost. Soil erosion and water quality will respond to fire, fire control methods, land clearing, insect outbreaks, road construction, and industrial developments.
    [Show full text]