Outliers the Story of Success

Outliers The Story of Success Malcolm Gladwell New York: Little Brown and Company, 2008 “This is a book about outliers, about men and women who do things that are out of the ordinary.” [p. 17] Includes: 2 Quotes from Outliers What makes successful people so different? In this book synopsis with Randy Mayeux, you will find that the secret of success may have more to do with opportunity, the “10,000 hour rule,” luck, and what Gladwell calls 5 Detailed outline “accumulative advantage,” rather than individual merit. During this presentation, you will discover that maybe outliers aren’t really outliers after all. Outliers is a bestseller and voted as one of the Best Books 7 Observations and Discussion of 2008. Quotes 1. In Outliers, I want to do for our understanding of success what Stewart Wolf did for our understanding of health. (p. 11). 2. Canadian hockey is a meritocracy. Thousands of Canadian boys begin to play the sport at the “novice” level, before they are even in kindergarten. From that point on, there are leagues for every age class, and at each of those levels, the players are sifted and sorted and evaluated, with the most talented separated out and groomed for the next level. By the time players reach their midteens, the very best of the best have been channeled into an elite league… This is the way most sports pick their future stars… For that matter, it is not all that different from the way the world of classical music picks its future virtuosos, or the way the world of ballet picks its future ballerinas, or the way our elite educational system picks its future scientists and intellectuals. (pp. 16 & 17). 3. You can’t buy your way into Major Junior A hockey… Success in “People don’t rise from hockey is based on individual merit – and both of those words are important. Players are judged on their own performance, not on nothing.” [p. 18] anyone else’s, and on the basis of their ability, not on some other arbitrary fact. 4. Or are they? (p. 17). 5. This is a book about outliers, about men and women who do things that are out of the ordinary. Over the course of this book, I’m going to introduce you to one kind of outlier after another: to geniuses, business tycoons, rock stars, and software programmers… In examining the lives of the remarkable among us – the skilled, the talented, and the driven – I will argue that there is something profoundly wrong with the way we make sense of success. (p. 17). 6. When Jeb Bush ran for governor of Florida, he repeatedly referred to himself as a “self-made man,” and it is a measure of how deeply we associate success with the efforts of the individual that few batted an eye at that description. 7. In Outliers, I want to convince you that these kinds of personal explanations of success don’t work. People don’t rise from nothing. We do owe something to parentage and patronage. (Successful people) in fact are invariably the beneficiaries of hidden advantages and extraordinary opportunities and cultural legacies that allow them to learn and work hard and make sense of the world in ways that others cannot. (pp. 18 & 19). 8. Biologists often talk about the “ecology” of an organism: the tallest oak in the forest is the tallest not just because it grew from the hardiest acorn; it is the tallest also because no other trees blocked its sunlight, the soil around it was deep and rich, no rabbit chewed through its bark as a sapling, and no lumberjack cut it down before it matured. We all know that successful people come for hardy seeds. But do we know enough about the sunlight that warmed them, the soil in which they put down the roots and the rabbits and lumberjacks they were lucky enough to avoid? This is not a book about tall trees. It’s a book about forests – and hockey is a good place to start because the explanation for who gets to the top of the hockey world is a lot more interesting and complicated than it looks. In fact, it’s downright peculiar. (pp. 19-20). Outliers 2 “Success is the result of what sociologists like to call ‘accumulative advantage.’” [ p.30] 9. Most parents, one suspects, think that whatever disadvantage a younger child faces in kindergarten eventually goes away. But it doesn’t. The small initial advantage that the child born in the early part of the year has over the child born at the end of the years persists. It locks children into patterns of achievement and underachievement, encouragement and discouragement, that stretch on and on for years. (p. 28). 10. Think for a moment about what the story of hockey and early birthdays says about success. It tells us that our notion that it is the best and the brightest who effortlessly rise to the top is much too simplistic. 11. It’s the “Matthew Effect.” (from the sociologist Robert Merton). It’s those who are successful who are most likely to be given the kinds of special opportunities that lead to further success. It’s the rich who get the biggest tax breaks. It’s the best students who get the best teaching and the most attention. And it’s the biggest nine-and ten-year-olds who get the most coaching and practice. Success is the result of what sociologists like to call “accumulative advantage.” (p. 30). 12. Those born in the last half of the year have all been discouraged, or overlooked, or pushed out of the sport. The talent of essentially half of the Czech athletic population has been squandered. (p. 31). 13. Because we so profoundly personalize success, we miss opportunities to lift others onto the top rung… We prematurely wrote off people as failures. (p. 32). 14. The question is this: is there such a thing as innate talent? Achievement is talent plus preparation. The problem with this view is that the closer psychologists look at the careers of the gifted, the smaller the role innate talent seems to play and the bigger the role preparation seems to play. (p. 38). 15. The people at the very top don’t work just harder or even much harder than everyone else. They work much, much harder. (p. 39). 16. Lucky breaks don’t seem like the exception with software billionaires and rock bands and star athletes. They seem like the rule. (p. 56). 17. “The best time during the history of the United States for the poor boy ambitious for high business success to have been born was around the year 1835.” (C. Wright Mills). (p. 63). 18. Steve Jobs came of age breathing the air of the very business he would later dominate. (p. 66). 19. There are very clearly patterns here, and we don’t want to acknowledge them. We pretend that success is exclusively a matter of individual merit. (p. 67). 20. Once someone has reached an IQ of somewhere around 120, having additional IQ points doesn’t seem to translate into any measurable real-world advantage… A mature scientist with an adult IQ of 130 is as likely to win a Nobel Prize as is one whose IQ is 180. (pp. 79 & 80). 21. “Knowledge of a boy’s IQ is of little help if you are faced with a formful of clever boys.” (Barry Schwarz). (p. 84). Outliers 3 22. The particular skill that allows you to talk your way out of a murder rap, or convince your professor to move you from the morning to the afternoon section, is what the psychologist Robert Sternberg calls “practical intelligence… …knowing what to say to whom, knowing when to say it, and knowing how to say it for maximum effect.” (p. 101). 23. The sense of entitlement that he has been taught is an attitude perfectly suited to succeeding in the modern world. (p. 108). 24. Chris Langan (IQ of 195 – but without the “practical skills” of others) had had to make his way alone – and no one – not rock stars, not professional athletes, nor software billionaires, and not even geniuses – ever makes it alone. (p. 115). 25. We tell rags-to-riches stories because we find something captivating in the idea of a lone hero battling overwhelming odds. But… (p. 120). 26. “No one who can rise before dawn three hundred sixty days a year fails to make his family rich.” (p. 224). 27. The number system in English is highly irregular. Not so in China, Japan, and Korea… Asian children learn to count much faster than American children. (p. 229). 28. Countries whose students are willing to concentrate and sit still long enough and focus on answering every single question in an endless questionnaire are the same countries whose students do the best job of solving math problems. (pp. 247-248). 29. The early educational reformers (in the United States) were tremendously concerned that children not get too much schooling… Horace Mann believed that working students too hard would create a “most pernicious influence upon character and habits….Not infrequently is health itself destroyed by over-stimulating the mind.” (p. 253). 30. When it comes to reading skills, poor kids learn nothing when school is not in session. The only problem with school, for the kids who aren’t achieving, is that there isn’t enough of it… For its poorest students, America doesn’t have a school problem. It has a summer vacation problem… (pp.

Load more