45359A Liste Over Storebrands Utelukkelser Engelsk Q1 2021
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Large Firm Dynamics and Secular Stagnation: Evidence from Japan and the U.S
Bank of Japan Working Paper Series Large Firm Dynamics and Secular Stagnation: Evidence from Japan and the U.S. Yoshihiko Hogen* [email protected] Ko Miura** [email protected] Koji Takahashi*** [email protected] No.17-E-8 Bank of Japan June 2017 2-1-1 Nihonbashi-Hongokucho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0021, Japan ***Research and Statistics Department (currently at the Monetary Affairs Department) *** Research and Statistics Department *** Research and Statistics Department (currently at the Financial System and Bank Examination Department) Papers in the Bank of Japan Working Paper Series are circulated in order to stimulate discussion and comments. Views expressed are those of authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Bank. If you have any comment or question on the working paper series, please contact each author. When making a copy or reproduction of the content for commercial purposes, please contact the Public Relations Department ([email protected]) at the Bank in advance to request permission. When making a copy or reproduction, the source, Bank of Japan Working Paper Series, should explicitly be credited. Large Firm Dynamics and Secular Stagnation: Evidence from Japan and the U.S. Yoshihiko Hogeny Ko Miuraz Koji Takahashix June 2017 Abstract Focusing on the recent secular stagnation debate, this paper examines the role of large …rm dynamics as determinants of productivity ‡uctuations. We …rst show that idiosyncratic shocks to large …rms as well as entry, exit, and reallocation e¤ects account for 30 to 40 percent of productivity ‡uctuations in Japan and the U.S. -
Japan Coal Phase-Out: the Path to Phase-Out by 2030 Summary: Japan Should Completely Phase out Coal by 2030
Japan Coal Phase-Out: The Path to Phase-Out by 2030 Summary: Japan should completely phase out coal by 2030. █ Coal-fired power generation emits more carbon dioxide (CO2) than any other method of generating electricity. In order to achieve net zero emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) as called for under the Paris Agreement, it is crucial to quickly decarbonize our energy sources. According to several research reports, that means we need to completely phase Japan Coal Phase-Out: out coal power plants, which obviously means halting new coal plant construction and also strategically retiring existing plants. For coal-fired power generation in Japan, the country must cancel all current planning for new construction, and also retire all existing coal The Path to Phase-Out by 2030 power plants by 2030 █ There were 117 units at existing coal power plants in Japan as of April 2018, based on Japan Coal Phase-Out: The Path to Phase-Out by 2030 Japan Coal Phase-Out: government statistics and publicly available information, and this number includes many older and inefficient plants that have been operating over 40 years. Contents █ The Japan 2030 Coal Phase-Out Plan presents a schedule to gradually retire all 117 units Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------p3 at existing coal power plants in Japan by 2030, starting with the oldest operating and least Main Report efficient plants. This plan is entirely achievable without threatening the electrical power 1. Status of Coal Power Generation in Japan ------------------------------p4 supply and without relying on nuclear power, if we take into account for the available (1) Coal power generation rose steadily since 1980 capacity of LNG and other power generation options, as well as the spread of renewable (2) Deluge of coal plant construction plans after TEPCO's energy and improvements in energy efficiency. -
Published on July 21, 2021 1. Changes in Constituents 2
Results of the Periodic Review and Component Stocks of Tokyo Stock Exchange Dividend Focus 100 Index (Effective July 30, 2021） Published on July 21, 2021 1. Changes in Constituents Addition（18） Deletion（18） CodeName Code Name 1414SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. 1801 TAISEI CORPORATION 2154BeNext-Yumeshin Group Co. 1802 OBAYASHI CORPORATION 3191JOYFUL HONDA CO.,LTD. 1812 KAJIMA CORPORATION 4452Kao Corporation 2502 Asahi Group Holdings,Ltd. 5401NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION 4004 Showa Denko K.K. 5713Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Ltd. 4183 Mitsui Chemicals,Inc. 5802Sumitomo Electric Industries,Ltd. 4204 Sekisui Chemical Co.,Ltd. 5851RYOBI LIMITED 4324 DENTSU GROUP INC. 6028TechnoPro Holdings,Inc. 4768 OTSUKA CORPORATION 6502TOSHIBA CORPORATION 4927 POLA ORBIS HOLDINGS INC. 6503Mitsubishi Electric Corporation 5105 Toyo Tire Corporation 6988NITTO DENKO CORPORATION 5301 TOKAI CARBON CO.,LTD. 7011Mitsubishi Heavy Industries,Ltd. 6269 MODEC,INC. 7202ISUZU MOTORS LIMITED 6448 BROTHER INDUSTRIES,LTD. 7267HONDA MOTOR CO.,LTD. 6501 Hitachi,Ltd. 7956PIGEON CORPORATION 7270 SUBARU CORPORATION 9062NIPPON EXPRESS CO.,LTD. 8015 TOYOTA TSUSHO CORPORATION 9101Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 8473 SBI Holdings,Inc. 2.Dividend yield (estimated) 3.50% 3. Constituent Issues (sort by local code) No. local code name 1 1414 SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. 2 1605 INPEX CORPORATION 3 1878 DAITO TRUST CONSTRUCTION CO.,LTD. 4 1911 Sumitomo Forestry Co.,Ltd. 5 1925 DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. 6 1954 Nippon Koei Co.,Ltd. 7 2154 BeNext-Yumeshin Group Co. 8 2503 Kirin Holdings Company,Limited 9 2579 Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings Inc. 10 2914 JAPAN TOBACCO INC. 11 3003 Hulic Co.,Ltd. 12 3105 Nisshinbo Holdings Inc. 13 3191 JOYFUL HONDA CO.,LTD. -
Itraxx Japan Series 35 Final Membership List March 2021
iTraxx Japan Series 35 Final Membership List March 2021 Copyright © 2021 IHS Markit Ltd T180614 iTraxx Japan Series 35 Final Membership List 1 iTraxx Japan Series 35 Final Membership List...........................................3 2 iTraxx Japan Series 35 Final vs. Series 34................................................ 5 3 Further information .....................................................................................6 Copyright © 2021 IHS Markit Ltd | 2 T180614 iTraxx Japan Series 35 Final Membership List 1 iTraxx Japan Series 35 Final Membership List IHS Markit Ticker IHS Markit Long Name ACOM ACOM CO., LTD. JUSCO AEON CO., LTD. ANAHOL ANA HOLDINGS INC. FUJITS FUJITSU LIMITED HITACH HITACHI, LTD. HNDA HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD. CITOH ITOCHU CORPORATION JAPTOB JAPAN TOBACCO INC. JFEHLD JFE HOLDINGS, INC. KAWHI KAWASAKI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. KAWKIS KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. KINTGRO KINTETSU GROUP HOLDINGS CO., LTD. KOBSTL KOBE STEEL, LTD. KOMATS KOMATSU LTD. MARUB MARUBENI CORPORATION MITCO MITSUBISHI CORPORATION MITHI MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. MITSCO MITSUI & CO., LTD. MITTOA MITSUI CHEMICALS, INC. MITSOL MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD. NECORP NEC CORPORATION NPG-NPI NIPPON PAPER INDUSTRIES CO.,LTD. NIPPSTAA NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION NIPYU NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA NSANY NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD. OJIHOL OJI HOLDINGS CORPORATION ORIX ORIX CORPORATION PC PANASONIC CORPORATION RAKUTE RAKUTEN, INC. RICOH RICOH COMPANY, LTD. SHIMIZ SHIMIZU CORPORATION SOFTGRO SOFTBANK GROUP CORP. SNE SONY CORPORATION Copyright © 2021 IHS Markit Ltd | 3 T180614 iTraxx Japan Series 35 Final Membership List SUMICH SUMITOMO CHEMICAL COMPANY, LIMITED SUMI SUMITOMO CORPORATION SUMIRD SUMITOMO REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD. TFARMA TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED TOKYOEL TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED TOSH TOSHIBA CORPORATION TOYOTA TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION Copyright © 2021 IHS Markit Ltd | 4 T180614 iTraxx Japan Series 35 Final Membership List 2 iTraxx Japan Series 35 Final vs. -
ANNUAL RE·PORT 2013 Astra Resources Plc (CN: 0762(218) and Controlled Entities Financial Report for the Period Ended on 30 June 2013
Astra Resources ANNUAL RE·PORT 2013 Astra Resources PlC (CN: 0762(218) and Controlled Entities Financial Report for the Period Ended on 30 June 2013 CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM ASTRA'S CEO , , 3 MESSAGE FROM ASTRA'S MANAGING DIRECTOR , 4 THE ASTRA WAY ...........................•..... , ,.., , , , , 5 OUR V1SION •.••••••.••.•.•.,•.•.••••..•..••.••••.•.•.•..,..•.•.•,..•.•.•.•••••,.••.•.•,........•....••..•.•....•....•.•..••.•.....•••••••.• ,.••.•.•••.•.•••....,.••...•..••..•.•...•..• ,.••.••.•........•....•.••••.................••.• 5 OUR MISSION •....................•................................................................•.............•................................•.....•.•.••.•.......•.•.•.•..•.••.•....•.•.• ,•.....•....•...•.•...•....•.•.• ,.•..•.. 5 OUR GOALS AND VALUES .•.•••••.•,.•••••.•,.••.•.••••....••.•....••....•.•..•.•...•••••.••.•.•...•.•....••.••••..• ,....•.••...•. ,•••••..•,.•.•..•..........•.•................••.................•..................•........ 5 HIGHLIGHTS & PRIORITIES 6 2013 HI GHLrGHTS ............................................•.............•..•.••..................•...........•...•..............•.............•..•.••.••.•.• ,•.•••,...•..•••••.••••.•••.,.•.•.•.•.•.••..•....••.••.••.•.•.••.• 6 2014 PRIORlTIES ,..,.....•.••.•..••.••••.•.•...••..•.••.•.••.•....•.••.....•.••.•.....••.• ,.•,.•,..••.•.........•.•.••.•.......•..••.••..•.•......•.••.•.•.••••..•.....•.•..•.••.•••••••........•.......•...............•.••.•... 8 BUSINESS STRATEGY ..........................................................................................................................•........ -
![Annual Report 2017[PDF:13857KB]](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/2221/annual-report-2017-pdf-13857kb-602221.webp)
Annual Report 2017[PDF:13857KB]
Chubu Electric Power Company Group Annual Report 2017 Chubu Electric Power Group Corporate Philosophy Chubu Electric Power Group delivers the energy that is indispensable for people’s lives and so contributes to the development of society. Sincere and We make a constant and sincere effort to fulfill our unchanging Sustained Effort mission and retain the trust of our customers and society. Creativity and We continually act with creativity and an enthusiasm for new challenges in order to pursue excellence in our services and meet the Spirit of Challenge expectations of our customers and society. Independence and We work together as individuals showing respect for one another to Cooperation create a vibrant and dynamic corporate culture. 1 Chubu Electric Power Company Group Annual Report 2017 A night view of Nagoya from a radio tower on the roof of the Chubu Electric Power Chiyoda Building Chubu Electric Power Company Group Annual Report 2017 2 Message from the Chairman and the President First of all, we would like to express our deepest appreciation for your support of our business operations. Following the full liberalization of the retail electricity market, the full liberalization of the retail gas market took place this April; this has pulled the energy business into a vortex of change. In addition, what we call “the 4th industrial revolution,” which is driven by IoT, AI and other cutting-edge technologies, is changing our economic and social structures drastically. The company is standing at a historic turning point right now and is making a fresh start. With a strong will to achieve reform in a unified effort across the group, we are working to develop a new business model and to enhance our business foundation to support that model. -
Corporate Rating Component Scores North America Q4 2020
Corporate Rating Component Scores North America Q4 2020 FALSE NA Corporate Rating Component Scores Oct. 31, 2020 Corporate Rating Component Scores North America Methodology," which is the criteria we use for rating corporate industrial companies and utilities. We list the scores for the 2308 public ratings in NA that are within the scope of our corporate methodology, accompanied by charts that show the distribution of aggregated scores. We believe that the list and charts enhance benchmarking across industries and rating levels for all market participants. We disclose these scores in line with the information we provide in our rating research publications, such as research updates and full analyses. By releasing all scores for public corporate ratings in NA, S&P Global Ratings confirms its commitment to deliver greater transparency and insight into the ratings process and simplify access for all market participants. Ratings are organized alphabetically by industry sector. The scores reflect the building blocks of the corporate ratings framework (see chart 1). Modifiers and components related to our group rating methodology or government-related entity methodology are indicated only where they have a positive or negative effect on the rating. The report reflects corporate credit ratings and scores as of Oct. 31, 2020. This document will not be updated for future rating actions or score revisions. To keep it concise, the list only discloses scores for the main rated entity of larger corporate groups. We omit certain entities such as subsidiaries or holding companies where the ratings are linked to those on their parent companies. In this report, we highlight changes since Jan. -
2019 Annual Report 1 Contents
Important Notice I. The Board, supervisory committee and directors, supervisors and senior management of the Company warrant that this report does not contain any misrepresentations, misleading statements or material omissions, and are jointly and severally liable for the authenticity, accuracy and completeness of the information contained in this report. II. This report was approved at the 25th meeting of the fourth session of the Board of the Company. 8 out of nine eligible directors attended the meeting in person. Li Dong, a director, asked for leave due to business appointment, and appointed Gao Song, a director, to act as his proxy and vote on behalf of him at the meeting. III. KPMG has issued a standard unqualified independent auditor’s report to the Company under the Hong Kong Standards on Auditing, in connection with the Company’s 2019 financial statements prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards. IV. Wang Xiangxi, Chairman of the Company, Xu Shancheng, Chief Financial Officer, and Ban Jun, person-in-charge of the accounting department, warrant the authenticity, accuracy and completeness of the financial statements contained in this report. V. The Board proposed the payment of a final dividend in cash of RMB1.26 per share (inclusive of tax) for the year 2019 based on the total registered share capital on the equity registration date of the implementation of the equity distribution. The profit distribution proposal is subject to the approval by shareholders at the general meeting. According to the total share capital of 19,889,620,455 shares of the Company as at 31 December 2019, the final dividend totals RMB25,061 million (inclusive of tax). -
The Mineral Industry of Chile in 1998
THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF CHILE By Pablo Velasco In 1998, Chile continued to be the top producer and exporter negotiate a trade agreement in the medium term. Chile shared of copper in terms of volume and value, producing 30.8% of the the U.S. interest in negotiating a comprehensive trade world's mined copper. Chile was recognized by the world agreement between the two countries. This is because the mining community as being the single most active mining United States was Chile’s most important single trading partner country in terms of new development and investment; of the and source of foreign investment. In 1995, Chile began total $5.04 billion in foreign investment, about 32% was in negotiations to joint the North American Free Trade mining. Direct foreign investment in Chilean mining rose to Agreement (NAFTA). Those talks have been stalled because of $1.6 billion in 1997. political factors in the United States. The U.S. administration Copper remained the country’s most important export planned to introduce legislation in Congress, which, if product, accounting for about 36% of export earnings in the approved, would allow negotiations related to Chilean first 9 months of 1998. Chile was also one of the world's accession to NAFTA or to a bilateral trade agreement with the significant producers and exporters of potassium nitrate and United States. sodium nitrate and ranked second after Japan in world A key feature of the government of Chile’s development production of iodine. Chile ranked first in lithium, second in strategy was a welcoming attitude towards foreign investors, rhenium, and third in molybdenum. -
Hang Seng Indexes Announces Index Review Results
14 August 2020 Hang Seng Indexes Announces Index Review Results Hang Seng Indexes Company Limited (“Hang Seng Indexes”) today announced the results of its review of the Hang Seng Family of Indexes for the quarter ended 30 June 2020. All changes will take effect on 7 September 2020 (Monday). 1. Hang Seng Index The following constituent changes will be made to the Hang Seng Index. The total number of constituents remains unchanged at 50. Inclusion: Code Company 1810 Xiaomi Corporation - W 2269 WuXi Biologics (Cayman) Inc. 9988 Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. - SW Removal: Code Company 83 Sino Land Co. Ltd. 151 Want Want China Holdings Ltd. 1088 China Shenhua Energy Co. Ltd. - H Shares The list of constituents is provided in Appendix 1. The Hang Seng Index Advisory Committee today reviewed the fast expanding innovation and new economy sectors in the Hong Kong capital market and agreed with the proposal from Hang Seng Indexes to conduct a comprehensive study on the composition of the Hang Seng Index. This holistic review will encompass various aspects including, but not limited to, composition and selection of constituents, number of constituents, weightings, and industry and geographical representation, etc. The underlying aim of the study is to ensure the Hang Seng Index continues to serve as the most representative and important benchmark of the Hong Kong stock market. Hang Seng Indexes will report its findings and propose recommendations to the Advisory Committee within six months. The number of constituents of the Hang Seng Index may increase during this period. Hang Seng Indexes Announces Index Review Results /2 2. -
Announcement on Replies to the Letter of Enquiry from The
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this announcement, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this announcement. (a Sino-foreign joint stock limited company incorporated in the People’s Republic of China) (Stock Code: 902) ANNOUNCEMENT ON REPLIES TO THE LETTER OF ENQUIRY FROM THE SHANGHAI STOCK EXCHANGE Huaneng Power International, Inc. (“the Company”), on 14 April 2020, received a Letter of Enquiry regarding Information Disclosure of 2019 Annual Report of Huaneng Power International, Inc. (Shang Zheng Gong Han [2020] No. 0350) (the “Letter of Enquiry”) from the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Upon receiving the Letter of Enquiry, the Company proactively arranged with relevant parties to carry out diligent research as well as discussion and analysis on the issues raised in the Letter of Enquiry. In accordance with the requirements of the Letter of Enquiry, replies to relevant issues are as follows: I. In relation to Assets Impairment with Significant Amount According to the annual report, the Company accrued significant asset impairment of RMB5.886 billion at the end of the reporting period. To this, please supplement and explain each of the following items: 1. In relation to aggregate impairment amount of RMB3.818 billion for the 10 asset groups, including Huaneng Yushe Power Generation Co., -
Schedule of Investments (Unaudited) Ishares MSCI Total International Index Fund (Percentages Shown Are Based on Net Assets) September 30, 2020
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) September 30, 2020 Mutual Fund Value Total International ex U.S. Index Master Portfolio of Master Investment Portfolio $ 1,034,086,323 Total Investments — 100.4% (Cost: $929,170,670) 1,034,086,323 Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets — (0.4)% (3,643,126) Net Assets — 100.0% $ 1,030,443,197 iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund (the “Fund”) seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing all of its assets in International Tilts Master Portfolio (the “Master Portfolio”), which has the same investment objective and strategies as the Fund. As of September 30, 2020, the value of the investment and the percentage owned by the Fund of the Master Portfolio was $1,034,086,323 and 99.9%, respectively. The Fund records its investment in the Master Portfolio at fair value. The Fund’s investment in the Master Portfolio is valued pursuant to the pricing policies approved by the Board of Directors of the Master Portfolio. Fair Value Hierarchy as of Period End Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of financial instruments. These inputs to valuation techniques are categorized into a fair value hierarchy consisting of three broad levels for financial reporting purposes as follows: • Level 1 – Unadjusted price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets or liabilities that the Fund has the ability to access • Level 2 – Other observable inputs (including, but not limited to, quoted prices