Appendix B History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix B History appendix The Historic Era The earliest European occupants of the Shawmut penin- Cambridge, lobbied successfully for the construction of the ,-foot B sula and of Cambridge and Charlestown to the north Craigie or Canal Bridge between that point and Leverett Street in Boston. tended to view the Charles River not as a scenic or recre- Further upstream, Cambridge and Brighton were connected by the River ational resource but as an obstacle to efficient movement Street Bridge in and the Western Avenue Bridge in . from town to town. Major improvements in the water- course during the seventeenth century attest to the domi- Population and commerce grew rapidly in the lower portion of the nance of this view. In Boston permitted entrepre- Charles River Basin, and both public officials and industrialists began the neurs to dam the North Cove—for the most part a process of altering the natural configuration of the river, largely in the Tsaltwater marsh separated from the Charles by a causeway visible only at interests of commercial and municipal development. One of the earliest low tide—and then build a canal to harness the ebb and flow of ocean such projects was the stone dam built in upstream of Galen Street at tides in order to power grist and saw mills. In the long causeway the fall line. The first land-making project in the West End of Boston known as the Great Bridge, the first bridge to span the Charles and thus was the construction of a seawall near Leverett Street and filling behind it to connect Boston and the region to the north, was built over mud flats to create land for Boston’s new almshouse between and . and salt marshes on the site of the present Anderson Bridge near Harvard Ropewalks lined the shore between Charles Street and the river by . Square. Until , when the Charles River Basin was created, the history of both History the Cambridge and Boston shorelines is one of constant efforts to con- Boston remained sparsely populated through the seventeenth and much vert the mud flats and marshes to dry land. Most of the new land was of the eighteenth centuries, but both population and commerce began to claimed by industrial and transportation interests like the Boston and accelerate after the American Revolution. Population grew from , in Lowell Railroad, whose depot was built on made land in . Twenty to , in . In the completion of the Charles River Bridge— years later the Grand Junction Railroad laid tracks on an embankment a private ,-foot toll bridge that stood on oak piers and crossed the and built a route from the Boston & Albany Railroad in Brookline 167 river just downstream of the present Charlestown Bridge—was com- through Cambridge, Somerville and Everett to the wharves in East pleted. Other bridges quickly followed, including the West Boston Boston; percent of its track ran over mud flats and marshes that entre- Bridge, a ,-foot causeway supported by piers that crossed the river preneurs filled over time. and broad salt marshes between Cambridge Street in Boston’s West End to Main Street in Cambridge in . It reduced the distance between The Back Bay, originally a vast tidal backwash that separated the Cambridge and Boston from eight miles to three and one-half. Sixteen Boston peninsula from the town of Brookline, was also an early site of years later Andrew Craigie, developer of Lechmere’s Point in East industrial development. In the Boston and Roxbury Mill appendix Corporation completed the .-mile Great Dam Institutions were also attracted by the river. river by annexing what became the Public along the present line of Beacon Street from In the Massachusetts General Hospital Garden to Boston Common and mandating Charles Street to Sewell’s Point in Brookline; chose a site in the West End on the verge of the that it be “forever kept open and free of build- toll-supported Western Avenue ran along the river’s mud flats, and in the Charles Street ings of any kind, for the use of the citizens.” B top. The dam enclosed acres of the Back Jail was built on made land next to the West Bay and created power for milling operations. Boston Bridge nearby. A military presence had In Scottish expatriate Robert Fleming Further upstream, the Brighton Abattoir was been established during the Revolution, when Gourlay advanced this more public view of the granted exclusive rights in for all cattle Cottage Farm and Fort Washington in Cambridge river in his “General Plan for Enlarging and slaughtering within a six-mile radius of Boston, were the site of batteries; it was strengthened on Improving the City of Boston.” Gourlay’s plan and acquired acres along the river. the Cambridge side when the state built a pow- would have filled the Charles’s mud flats to cre- der magazine in at Captain’s Island, now ate a public garden, built islands in the river to The industrial development of shoreline land part of Magazine Beach. Upstream the federal make a water park, and constructed boulevards in Cambridge was pursued with equal intensity. government established the Watertown Arsenal on both sides of the river. The plan was never By the Cambridge Proprietors had per- on the banks of the Charles in . The char- implemented, but its prescient recommenda- suaded the federal government to designate acter of the river was transformed when Harvard tions made their way into other plans that Cambridge an official United States port of University, the Massachusetts Institute of Tech- ultimately were. entry and had begun to fill marshes and lay out nology, and Boston University determined to lots for industrial development. A system of locate on the river early in the twentieth century. By mid-century pollution problems along canals was also built in Cambridgeport with the the length of the basin had grown more seri- History hope that this industrial part of the city could ven as industries and institutions ous. Historian Walter Muir Whitehill noted compete successfully with the rest of Boston claimed much shoreline land, planners that the shore “was marred by industries merely Harbor and other East Coast ports. In on both sides of the river projected a in search of cheap land” and waterpower; the Cambridge Improvement Company trans- more public role for the Charles. As “squalid hovels, dump heaps and other nui- formed a muddy backwater in East Cambridge Eearly as Boston Mayor Josiah Quincy had sances” made it additionally unseemly. Indus- 168 into the Lechmere Canal for industrial use. In expressed concern over the dumping of residen- trial sewage and effluvia, especially from the the legislature authorized the construction tial and industrial waste into the tidal Charles. slaughterhouses, made the river unsafe and of the Harvard Bridge between West Chester As population and development exploded in extremely unpleasant at low tide. Park in Boston and Massachusetts Avenue in the s, the twice-daily tides were no longer Cambridge. The Charles River Embankment capable of flushing the river of sewage, and the By the first plans for filling the marshes Company also built granite seawalls on the stench of its mud flats at low tide grew intolera- behind the Great Dam (or Mill Dam, now river’s north shore as part of an effort to fill ble. At high tide the river was little more than Beacon Street) were advanced. In the state, the marshes and create developable land. diluted sewage filled with “floating putrescible the city of Boston, and private owners reached materials.” Quincy begin an effort to stem com- an agreement to remove the industrial develop- mercial and industrial development along the ments in the Back Bay in favor of filling the appendix area to end the public health problem and cre- and railroad bridges near the mouth of the river had come to be valued more highly. In the ate a new and fashionable residential district for had greatly impeded the ability of commercial firm of famed landscape designer Frederick Law the overcrowded peninsula. By then the dam vessels to navigate the channel. The Charles Olmsted proposed a plan for The Charlesbank had become a popular promenade, and the River Improvement Commission, created to in Boston’s West End that emphasized outdoor value of the river as scenery had begun to take consider the construction of a dam across the recreation. The firm envisioned a series of recre- B hold. Informal teams of students and clubs Charles, addressed the problem in its first ational spaces for such activities as quoits and began racing on the river as early as the s. report of . “The stream, which was once the gymnastics, then a popular import from In filling of the tidal flats began in earnest, only highway of the district, is become the Germany. The Charlesbank embraced almost and by the late s acres of land, still principal obstacle in many highways,” the com- twenty-six acres at the foot of the West End known as the Back Bay, were created. mission stated. “The bridges have been multi- slope. Five years later the firm completed a park plied until there are now twelve ordinary plan for Cambridge, advocated linking Boston’s Inspired by the Back Bay, Cambridge began bridges and five railroad structures crossing the riverside to the Olmsted-designed “Emerald to fill marshes on the north side of the river river and still there are not enough. the rail- Necklace,” and advised damming the Charles beginning in and laid out a grand boule- road bridges [near the Charlestown Bridge] downstream to create a freshwater basin for vard for a residential district, modeled on the have been widened of late years until they now boating and swimming.
Recommended publications
  • Hearing Set on Plans to Upgrade 95-Year-Old Larz Anderson Bridge - Allston Brighton - Your Town - Boston.Com
    Hearing set on plans to upgrade 95-year-old Larz Anderson Bridge - Allston Brighton - Your Town - Boston.com YOUR TOWN (MORE TOWNS) Sign In | Register now Allston Brighton home news events discussions search < Back to front page Text size – + Connect to Your Town Allston Brighton on Facebook Like You like Your Town Allston-Brighton. Unlike · Admin Page · Error ALLSTON BRIGHTON, CAMBRIDGE You and 51 others like this 51 people like this Hearing set on plans to upgrade ADVERTISEMENT 95-year-old Larz Anderson Bridge Posted by Matt Rocheleau October 21, 2010 11:28 AM E-mail | Print | Comments () ALLSTON-BRIGHTON REAL ESTATE 86 160 6 0 Homes Rentals Open houses New listings for sale available this week this week ADVERTISEMENT (Courtesy MassDOT) The nearly century-old Anderson Memorial Bridge is under design to improve its structural integrity and enhance the bridge's accessibility. By Matt Rocheleau, Town Correspondent A public hearing on design plans to refurbish the 95-year-old Anderson Memorial Bridge’s will be held in two weeks. The historic three-span, 440-foot Charles River crossing, commonly referred to as the “Larz Anderson Bridge,” connects Allston and Cambridge. It is one of six Charles River bridges currently under construction or in design under the state’s eight-year, $3 billion Accelerated Bridge Programthat began two years ago and includes $400 million to improve Lower Basin area bridges of the Charles River. Allston Brighton A hearing to update area residents and “to provide the public with the Headlines opportunity to become fully acquainted” with the Anderson bridge rehabilitation project will be held Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan for Planned Development Area No. 115
    HARVARD university Master Plan for Planned Development Area No. 115 Submitted Pursuant to Article 80 of the Boston Zoning Code Harvard Enterprise Research Campus SubmiƩ ed to: Boston Redevelopment Authority d/b/a the Boston Planning & Development Agency SubmiƩ ed by: Harvard University With Technical Assistance From: DLA Piper Reed Hilderbrand VHB WSP ALLSTON CAMPUS December 2017 Master Plan for Planned Development Area No. 115 Submitted Pursuant to Article 80 of the Boston Zoning Code Harvard Enterprise Research Campus Submitted to: Boston Redevelopment Authority d/b/a the Boston Planning and Development Agency Submitted by: Harvard University With Technical Assistance From: DLA Piper Reed Hilderbrand VHB WSP December 2017 Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Relationship to Framework Plan .................................................................................................... 2 3.0 PDA Area Description ........................................................................................................................ 2 4.0 The Proposed Project ........................................................................................................................ 2 5.0 Planning Objectives and Character of Development .................................................................... 4 6.0 Project Benefits ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction of Historic Longfellow Bridge Announced - the Office of the Governor - Mass.Gov
    Reconstruction of Historic Longfellow Bridge Announced - The Office of the Governor - Mass.Gov State Agencies State A-Z Topics Alert - No Active Alerts Skip to main content Need help resizing text? The official website of the Governor of Massachusetts Governor in Governor's Office Deval Patrick Legislation & The Administration Constituent Services Press Office Agenda Get Involved Executive Orders Home Press Office Press Releases DEVAL L. PATRICK For Immediate release - June 21, 2010 GOVERNOR TIMOTHY P. MURRAY LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Governor Partick Announces Reconstruction of Historic Longfellow Bridge Media Contact Iconic Bridge Represents Signature Accelerated Bridge Program Investment Along the Charles River Basin Juan Martinez Kim Haberlin BOSTON - Monday, June 21, 2010 - As part of the Patrick-Murray Heather Johnson Administration's Massachusetts Works program to promote job growth Caitlin Coyle 617-725-4025 and long-term economic recovery, Governor Deval Patrick today Colin Durrant (MassDOT) announced that the reconstruction of the historic Longfellow Bridge is 617-973-7870 moving forward, a signature project funded by Governor Patrick's eight- year, $3 billion Accelerated Bridge Program to repair structurally deficient and obsolete bridges across the Commonwealth. The estimated $260 million investment in rebuilding the Longfellow Bridge begins this year with a $20 million early action contract to include preparatory work, with the full reconstruction expected to begin in fall 2011. The Longfellow project is the largest of several investments totaling more than $300 million in rebuilding the bridges along the Charles River Basin, including the BU Bridge, Craigie Drawbridge, and the Western Avenue, River Street, and Anderson Memorial Bridges. "There may be no greater symbol of the neglect our roads and bridges suffered under previous administrations than the Longfellow Bridge," said Governor Patrick.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Artery/Tunnel Project: a Precast Bonanza
    PART 1 Central Artery/Tunnel Project: A Precast Bonanza by Vijay Chandra, P.E. Anthony 1. Ricci, RE. Senior Vice President Chief Bridge Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Central Artery/Tunnel Project Douglas, Inc. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority New York, New York Boston, Massachusetts This article provides an overview of the monumental efforts of Massachusetts transportation officials, their engineering consultants, and multitudes of construction industry professionals to ease congestion, improve motorist safety, and address issues of environmental quality in the heart of Boston, Massachusetts. The Central Artery/Tunnel Project is the largest highway construction job ever undertaken in the United States, involving many diverse types of precast concrete construction. maj or transportation infrastructure undertaking, • Standardized temporary structures utilizing precast con billed as “The Big Dig,” is transforming traffic op crete elements. A erations in and around Boston, Massachusetts. This • Precast segmental box girders integrated into cast-in-place $13.2 billion project, the biggest and most complex trans columns to provide seismically resistant connections. portation system ever undertaken in the United States, is • Precast segmental boxes cut at a skew to connect them on significant not only in this country, but worldwide. Nu either side of straddle bents. merous innovative construction techniques are being used, The project has brought out the best that precast con including: crete technology has to offer — in many cases utilizing • Precast tunnels jacked under railroad embankments. cutting edge techniques — and has been of immeasurable • Deep soil mixing to stabilize land reclaimed from the value to New England’s precasting industry. Precasters, ocean. faced with many complex and daunting challenges, are • Precast concrete immersed tube tunnels.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Pritchard, Secretary Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 100 Cambridge St., Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 Attn: MEPA Office, Deirdre Buckley
    Stephen Pritchard, Secretary Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 100 Cambridge St., Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 attn: MEPA Office, Deirdre Buckley John A. Blundo, P.E. Chief Engineer Massachusetts Highway Department 10 Park Plaza Boston, MA 02116 June 7, 2006 Re: Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge/Charles River EOEA #13777 MHD Project File No. 604361 Dear Secretary Pritchard and Mr. Blundo: WalkBoston appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project during the early phases of project design, and also appreciates the time and in depth information and conversation that your staff and consultants provided at the Beacon Hill Civic Association meeting that I attended last week. We are also pleased that your approach to the bridge design is carefully considering the needs of pedestrians, bicycles (including bike lanes) and universal access in addition to the needs of vehicular traffic and the MBTA. We realize that the constraints of historic preservation and impacts to adjacent parkland mean that the designs must juggle many issues in a very tight space. Our comments primarily address issues that were not yet incorporated into the plans that were presented at the meeting. When the comments were brought up at the meeting, the MHD and DCR staff and consultants all expressed a willingness to include these items in the next rounds of planning and design for the project. We look forward to their inclusion in the ENF that we understand is to be filed later this summer. 1. Information about traffic, pedestrian and bicycle volumes on the bridge, with estimates of future volumes based on enhanced bicycle and pedestrian conditions and connections to/from city streets and Charles River parkland.
    [Show full text]
  • But How Do We Get to the Greenway?
    Proceedings of the Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning Volume 4 Article 6 Issue 1 Pathways to Sustainability 2013 “But How Do We Get to the Greenway?”— A Multi-disciplinary, Multi-jurisdiction, Multimodal Strategy to Increase Connections to the Charles River Basin Cynthia Smith FASLA Vice President, Halvorson Design Partnership, Inc., Landscape Architecture and Planning, Boston MA Phil Goff EEDL AP Alta Planning + Design, Multi-modal Specialists, Boston, MA Christopher M. Greene RLA Senior Associates, Halvorson Design Partnership, Inc., Landscape Architecture and Planning, Boston MA Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/fabos Part of the Botany Commons, Environmental Design Commons, Geographic Information Sciences Commons, Horticulture Commons, Landscape Architecture Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Cynthia FASLA; Goff, Phil LEED AP; and Greene, Christopher M. RLA (2013) "“But How Do We Get to the Greenway?”— A Multi-disciplinary, Multi-jurisdiction, Multimodal Strategy to Increase Connections to the Charles River Basin," Proceedings of the Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/fabos/vol4/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Smith et al.: Connections to the Charles River “But how do we get to the Greenway?”— a multi-disciplinary, multi-jurisdiction, multi- modal strategy to increase connections to the Charles River Basin Cynthia Smith, FASLA1, Phil Goff, LEED AP2, Christopher M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystic River Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossing
    July 29, 2019 Somerville Conservation Commission Rachel Borgatti, Chair Dear Ms. Borgatti, We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Mystic River Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossing. We enthusiastically support this important infrastructure project and commend Encore Boston Harbor and DCR for their efforts to move towards implementation. Mystic River communities have been waiting for over a decade for this connection – we’re grateful to have these partners to turn ideas into reality. The Mystic River Watershed Association (MyRWA) is a non-profit organization dedicated to the preservation and enhancement of the Mystic River watershed. This includes working to improve the water quality in the Mystic River and its tributaries and promoting public access through the formation of continuous greenways for recreation and transportation. We believe that these efforts will improve public health, the environment, and economy of Mystic River communities. The proposed pedestrian and bike bridge will provide a much-needed connection between Somerville and Everett, help to complete the 25-mile Mystic Greenways network, connect dozens of North Shore cities with downtown Boston, and close a critical gap in the 3,000-mile East Coast Greenway. This bridge will also: - Leverage the state’s investment in the Northern Strand: this bridge will connect residents of Lynn, Saugus, Revere, Malden, and Everett to Somerville, Boston and Cambridge. Without this bridge, the Northern Strand will dead-end at the Mystic River. - Unlock high-capacity transit access to the Orange Line and promote walking and biking, thus reducing automobile trips and vehicular traffic. - Connect Somerville's recently rebuilt Sylvester Baxter Park, planned Draw 7 Park Redesign and the in-progress path along the MBTA seawall to the new parks and paths along Everett’s waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Geography SATURDAY, JUNE 16T H
    BIKE TOURS OF CAMBRIDGE 2007 Sponsored by Cambridge Bicycle Committee RIDE INFO: www.cambridgebikes.org Portions of the Riverside and Cambridgeport neighborhoods from the 1865 J.G. Chase Map of the City of Cambridge. h 19t ay m M f ro led edu sch Re ROLLING through Cambridge Geography from 1776 to Today Cambridge City Hall Central Square SATURDAY, JUNE 16 TH 10:00 a.m. Sta rt The structure and composition of Cambridge’s land influenced settlement from the outset. The English did not find a wilderness of for - Today’s Cambridge looks little like the marsh- est, but rather something like parkland since bordered grassland of 1630. These bordering Native Americans had altered the landscape marshes, the wide Charles River, and glacier- with agriculture and controlled burning. Eng - formed high ground determined the course of de - lish settlers found the soil of poor quality and velopment in Cambridge. Many of these thus relied on grazing livestock to form the geographical features are evident on the relief map basis of Cambridge’s agricultural economy. at City Hall where the tour begins. This map was created in 1976, depicting Cambridge in 1776 to However, the geography underlying this land celebrate the U.S. bicentennial. The map draws on shaped the development of Cambridge to an research from the extensive stores of historical even greater extent. data held by the Cambridge Historical Commis - sion who created the display. ride length: 12.5 miles ride time: approx. 2 hours ROLLING THROUGH CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY 2007 RIDE INFO: www.cambridgebikes.org (a.) Salt marsh land ownership in East Cambridge, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Against All Odds MIT's Pioneering Women of Landscape Architecture
    Against all Odds MIT’s Pioneering Women of Landscape Architecture * Eran Ben-Joseph, Holly D. Ben-Joseph, Anne C. Dodge1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and Planning, City Design and Development Group 77 Massachusetts Ave. 10-485 Cambridge, MA 02139 1 November 2006 * Recipient of the 6th Milka Bliznakov Prize Commendation: International Archive of Women in Architecture (IAWA) This research is aimed at exposing the influential, yet little known and short-lived landscape architecture program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) between 1900 and 1909. Not only was it one of only two professional landscape architecture education programs in the United States at the time (the other one at Harvard also started at 1900), but the first and only one to admit both women and men. Women students were attracted to the MIT option because it provided excellent opportunities, which they were denied elsewhere. Harvard, for example did not admit women until 1942 and all-women institutions such as the Cambridge School or the Cornell program were established after the MIT program was terminated. Unlike the other schools of that time, the MIT program did not keep women from the well-known academic leaders and male designers of the time nor from their male counterparts. At MIT, women had the opportunity to study directly with Beaux-Art design pioneers such as Charles S. Sargent, Guy Lowell, Désiré Despradelle, and the revered department head Francis Ward Chandler. Historical accounts acknowledged that a woman could “put herself through a stiff course” at MIT including advance science and structural engineering instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • ALLSTON LANDING the Parking Lot, and Substitute a Greater Variety of Plant Materials (4S) for the Arborvitae
    • Create additional optional program elements, including a food concession at the pool building, or a small pull-off with power and light for concession trucks. • Plant additional trees along the parkway in front of the pool and near the oaks in front of the pedestrian bridge. ELIOT CHARLES RIVER DAM LARZ ANDERSON OWN DAM WESTERN AVENUE WATERT GALEN STREET ARSENAL STREET T LONGFELLOW BEACON STREET RIVER STREE HA R V A RD U. • Frame river views by adding copses of trees along the edge of the B athletic fields. This will also soften the view of the Turnpike. • Mark the intersection of the Boston University Bridge and the Reid Overpass with perennial ornamental plants. • Accent the wall of the granite overlook with distinctive plantings. • Regrade the steep slope along the river edge of the pool, remove ALLSTON LANDING the parking lot, and substitute a greater variety of plant materials (4S) for the arborvitae. Soldiers Field Road between BU Bridge and River Street Bridge • Redesign existing lots to break up the parking and insure a mini- Key Resources mum fifty-foot setback from the shore. Provide signage indicating that public parking in Morse School parking lot is available during off- • River Street Bridge () peak hours, acknowledging the agreement reached with Cambridge • Soldiers Field Road () when the school was renovated. 122 • Massachusetts Turnpike ( ) • Dr. Paul Dudley White bicycle path extension (s) • Realign the entry drive to the MWRA facility to blend better with the park landscape. • Signalize Pleasant Street and include a pedestrian phase. SOLDIERS FIELD ROAD AND THE ELEVATED TURNPIKE JUST EAST OF ALLSTON LANDING.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation, Traffic and Parking
    Chapter from DPIR/DEIR dated 2-18-20 Bunker Hill Housing Redevelopment – DEIR-NPC/DPIR 5 Transportation This chapter provides an assessment of the Project’s transportation characteristics. The chapter includes evaluations of existing conditions and projected future conditions without and with the proposed Project (i.e., No-Build and Build conditions, respectively). Transportation improvements and mitigation measures are identified to address existing transportation problems in the area in addition to minimizing potential impacts of the Project. In addition to physical multi-modal transportation infrastructure improvements, the mitigation package includes a robust Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan designed to reduce single- occupant vehicle (SOV) travel and encourage use of alternative transportation modes. The Proponent will commit to these improvements through the execution of a Transportation Access Plan Agreement (TAPA) with the City of Boston. Key Findings The key findings of the transportation analysis include the following: The Proponent seeks to obtain a Phase 1 waiver in order to start construction on the first phase of construction while the Full Build Master Plan continues through the MEPA regulatory review process: This transportation analysis has been completed for both Phase 1 and the Full Build Master Plan (inclusive of Phase 1). The Phase 1 Project is expected to generate approximately 702 net new daily vehicle trips, with approximately 58 and 82 net new vehicle trips occurring in the morning and evening peak hours, respectively; The Full Build Master Plan is expected to generate approximately 5,006 net new daily vehicle trips, with approximately 382 and 533 net new vehicle trips occurring in the morning and evening peak hours, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1301.7656V1 [Physics.Hist-Ph]
    Origins of the Expanding Universe: 1912-1932 ASP Conference Series, Vol. 471 Michael J. Way and Deidre Hunter, eds. c 2013 Astronomical Society of the Pacific What Else Did V. M. Slipher Do? Joseph S. Tenn Department of Physics & Astronomy, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA, 94928, USA Abstract. When V. M. Slipher gave the 1933 George Darwin lecture to the Royal Astronomical Society, it was natural that he spoke on spectrographic studies of planets. Less than one–sixth of his published work deals with globular clusters and the objects we now call galaxies. In his most productive years, when he had Percival Lowell to give him direction, Slipher made major discoveries regarding stars, galactic nebulae, and solar system objects. These included the first spectroscopic measurement of the rotation period of Uranus, evidence that Venus’s rotation is very slow, the existence of reflection nebulae and hence interstellar dust, and the stationary lines that prove the existence of interstellar calcium and sodium. After Lowell’s death in 1916 Slipher con- tinued making spectroscopic observations of planets, comets, and the aurora and night sky. He directed the Lowell Observatoryfrom 1916 to 1954, where his greatest achieve- ments were keeping the observatory running despite very limited staff and budget, and initiating and supervising the “successful” search for Lowell’s Planet X. However, he did little science in his last decades, spending most of his time and energy on business endeavors. 1. Introduction Vesto Melvin Slipher, always referred to and addressed as “V. M.” (Giclas 2007; Hoyt 1980b) came to Flagstaff in August 1901, two months after completing his B.A.
    [Show full text]