The Red Panda, Olingos, Coatis, Raccoons, and Their Relatives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Red Panda, Olingos, Coatis, Raccoons, and Their Relatives Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan for Procyonids and Ailurids The Red Panda, Olingos, Coatis, Raccoons, and their Relatives (In English and Spanish) Compiled by Angela R. Glatston IUCNESC Mustelid, Viverrid, and Procyonid Specialist Group IUCNTheWorld Conservation Union SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION Suhwte qf Omn WWF aimgo Zoological society = - 0 = The Red Panda, Olingos, Coatis, Raccoons, and their Relatives was made possible through the generous support of: Chicago Zoological Society DEJA, Inc. International Fur Trade Federation People’s Trust for Endangered Species Peter Scott IUCNSSC Action Plan Fund (Sultanate of Oman) Royal Rotterdam Zoological and Botanical Gardens World Wide Fund for Nature 0 1994 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non-commercial purposes is authorized without permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is cited and the copyright holder receives a copy of the reproduced material. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. ISBN 2-8317-0046-9 Published by IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Camera-ready copy by the Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, Illinois 60513, U.S.A. Printed by Kelvyn Press, U.S.A. Cover photo: Styan’s red panda, Ailurus fulgens styani (photo by Takashi Miyake). Contents Contenidos Page Pigina Foreword ........................................................................ V Prijlogo . .46 Acknowledgements ....................................................... vi Agradecimientos . .47 Introduction ................................................................. vii Introduccibn . .48 ... Aims of the Action Plan .......................................... Vlll Los objetivos de este Plan de Action ..................... .49 1. Classification ............................................................. 1 1. Clasificaci6n ............................................................ 51 Overview of the Ailurid and Procyonid Genera.. ...... Description Panoramica de 10s Generos de Ailuridos y Procionidos ............................................ 54 2. Cultural, Economic, and Scientific Values of Procyonids and Ailurids .......................................... 8 2. Los Valores Culturales, Cientificos y Cultural and Economic Significance ........................ .8 Econbmicos de 10s Proci6nidos y Ailiiridos ........ .5 8 Scientific Value of Procyonids and Ailurids ........... 10 Importancia Cultural y Economica .......................... 58 El valor Cientifico de 10s Procionidos 3. Threats to Procyonids and Ailurids ..................... 11 y Ailuridos ................................................................ 60 . Hunting, Trapping and Trading ............................... 11 Habitat Loss and Fragmentation of Habitat.. .......... .12 3. Amenazas a 10s Proci6nidos y Ailiiridos.. ........... .62 Human Factors Affecting Conservation ................. .12 Caza, Trampeo y Comercio ..................................... 62 Threatened Species ................................................... 19 Perdida y Fragmentation de1 Habitat.. .................... .63 Data Sheets for Threatened Species.. ...................... .19 Factores Humanos que Afectan la Conservation. ..6 4 Red Panda ............................................................ 19 Especies Amenazadas .............................................. 70 Bushy-tailed Olingo ............................................ 21 Fichas Tecnicas para las Especies Amenazadas ......7 1 Allen’s Olingo ..................................................... 25 El Panda Rojo ...................................................... 71 Pocock’ s Olingo .................................................. 25 El Olingo de Cola Espesa .................................... 73 Harris . Olingo ...................................................... 25 El Olingo de Allen ............................................... 76 Chiriqui Olingo .................................................... 26 El Olingo de Pocock ............................................ 77 Cacomistle ........................................................... 26 El Olingo de Harris ............................................. 77 White-nosed Coati ............................................... 27 El Olingo Chiriqui ............................................... 78 Cozumel Island Coati .......................................... 29 El Cacomistle ...................................................... 78 Little or Mountain Coati ...................................... 29 El Coati de Hocico Blanc0 .................................. 79 Tres Marias Islands Raccoon .............................. 29 El Coati de la Isla Cozumel ................................. 81 Bahaman Raccoon ............................................... 32 El Coati Pequefio o de Montana .......................... 81 Guadeloupe Raccoon .......................................... 32 El Mapache de las Islas Tres Marias ................. .84 Cozumel Island Raccoon .................................... 33 El Mapache de Bahamas ..................................... 84 Barbados Raccoon ............................................... 33 El Mapache de Guadalupe ..................................z 84 El Mapache de la Isla Cozumel .......................... 85 4. Recommendations .................................................. 34 El Mapache de Barbados ..................................... 85 Taxonomic Research ................................................ 34 Ecological and Ethological Research ..................... .34 4. Recomendaciones ................................................... 86 Captive Breeding ...................................................... 35 Investigation Taxonomica ....................................... 86 Education .................................................................. 37 Investigation Ecologica y Etologica ....................... .86 Conservation Recommendations by Country ......... .37 Cria en Cautiverio .................................................... 87 ,’ Education ................................................................. 89 References .................................................................... 97 Recomendaciones de Conservation por Pais ......... .89 Appendix 1. Distribution Maps ................................. 100 Referencias . .97 Apkndice 1. Distribution Maps . 100 .. III, Foreword The IUCN/SSC Action Plan for Procyonids and Ailurids they are generally appealing to watch and their behavior is, as far as I am aware, unique among such documents in is engaging. This means that they should be an ideal that the impetus for its production began in the zoo com- attraction for visitors, which in turn arouses the interest munity, more specifically in the studbook and breeding and support of the public which can make the difference program activities which stand central to the work of all between the success and failure of a conservation initia- modern zoos. As we approach the 21st century, the role tive. This is even more important when an initiative is of zoological gardens is changing-they are emerging made on behalf of low-profile species, little known to the from their image as exploiters of wildlife into a major force scientist, let alone to politicians and the general public. for nature conservation. This welcome metamorphosis is In this Action Plan we read again and again how little is reflected amply in the links being forged between IUCN known about most of the procyonid and ailurid species. and the zoo world. IUCN/SSC’s Captive Breeding In some of the species discussed, the majority of the facts Specialist Group (CBSG), initiated and funded by zoos, available have been gained from captive studies rather than acts as a catalyst in this process by promoting cooperation field research. This is understandable given the difficulties between in situ conservation and ex situ breeding pro- in observing such cryptic species in the wild. Zoos are grams. The mission of the zoo of the future has been out- potentially tremendous sources of information, a fact lined in the World Zoo Conservation Strategy, recently which is only just being realized both by the zoos them- published jointly by the IUDZG-The World Zoo selves and the research communities. It is to be hoped Organization and CBSG. This Action Plan for the con- that in the future zoos will be more willing to open their servation of procyonids and ailurids demonstrates the real- doors and encourage the activities of scientists, particularly ization of this new philosophy, and it is therefore those interested in small carnivores, and that through their appropriate that it should be published now, shortly after cooperation our knowledge of these species will grow. the appearance of the zoo strategy itself. I would like to conclude by saying that I hope this The procyonids and ailurids, together with mustelids Action Plan achieves its objectives and arouses more inter- and viverrids, are species which could derive consider- est, conservation; and research in this little-known group able benefit from zoos. Although as a group these small of species. I hope its message reaches not only field biol- carnivores are not currently well represented in zoologi- ogists and conservationists, politicians and governments, cal collections around the world, they are nevertheless but also zoo curators and directors and zoo biologists so
Recommended publications
  • Classification of Mammals 61
    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FORCHAPTER SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Classification © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC 4 NOT FORof SALE MammalsOR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. 2ND PAGES 9781284032093_CH04_0060.indd 60 8/28/13 12:08 PM CHAPTER 4: Classification of Mammals 61 © Jones Despite& Bartlett their Learning,remarkable success, LLC mammals are much less© Jones stress & onBartlett the taxonomic Learning, aspect LLCof mammalogy, but rather as diverse than are most invertebrate groups. This is probably an attempt to provide students with sufficient information NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FORattributable SALE OR to theirDISTRIBUTION far greater individual size, to the high on the various kinds of mammals to make the subsequent energy requirements of endothermy, and thus to the inabil- discussions of mammalian biology meaningful.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List Lists of Species Check List 12(1): 1833, 24 January 2016 Doi: ISSN 1809-127X © 2016 Check List and Authors
    12 1 1833 the journal of biodiversity data 24 January 2016 Check List LISTS OF SPECIES Check List 12(1): 1833, 24 January 2016 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/12.1.1833 ISSN 1809-127X © 2016 Check List and Authors Carnivores (Mammalia) from areas of Nearctic–Neotropical transition in Puebla, central Mexico: presence, distribution, and conservation Osvaldo Eric Ramírez-Bravo1, 2* and Lorna Hernandez-Santin3 1 Durrell Institute for Conservation Ecology, Marlowe Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, England 2 Departamento de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas, Universidad de las Américas, Puebla, Santa Catarina Mártir, Sin Número, Cholula, Puebla. CP. 72820, México 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The Nearctic and Neotropical realms converge and Neotropical realms meet. Thus, Puebla contains in central Mexico, where many areas have not been a wide variety of habitats that range from semi-arid adequately characterized. Our objective was to revise to tropical rain forest, including cloud forests, oak the distribution and conservation status of carnivores in forests, pine forests, tropical dry forests, and xeric scrub the state of Puebla, central Mexico. Between September (Ramírez-Pulido et al. 2005). Elevation in the region 2008 and January 2011, we conducted interviews varies widely ranging from a minimum of 200 m on the and fieldwork on seven previously selected areas. We coastal plains of the Gulf of Mexico up to a maximum of complemented our data with bibliographical research. 5,700 m at the Pico de Orizaba, with abrupt variations We obtained 733 records for 21 species, representing on its four different mountain ranges (Ramírez-Pulido 63% of the carnivores reported for Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeographic and Diversification Patterns of the White-Nosed Coati
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 131 (2019) 149–163 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeographic and diversification patterns of the white-nosed coati (Nasua narica): Evidence for south-to-north colonization of North America T ⁎ Sergio F. Nigenda-Moralesa, , Matthew E. Gompperb, David Valenzuela-Galvánc, Anna R. Layd, Karen M. Kapheime, Christine Hassf, Susan D. Booth-Binczikg, Gerald A. Binczikh, Ben T. Hirschi, Maureen McColginj, John L. Koprowskik, Katherine McFaddenl,1, Robert K. Waynea, ⁎ Klaus-Peter Koepflim,n, a Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA b School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA c Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62209, Mexico d Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA e Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA f Wild Mountain Echoes, Vail, AZ 85641, USA g New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY 12233, USA h Amsterdam, New York 12010, USA i Zoology and Ecology, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia j Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA k School of Natural Resources and the Environment, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA l College of Agriculture, Forestry and Life Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA m Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Distribution, Status and Conservation of Musk Deer in China
    Folia Zool. – 53(2): 129–140 (2004) Review of the distribution, status and conservation of musk deer in China Yijun ZHOU1, Xiuxiang MENG1,2∗, Jinchao FENG1, Qisen YANG2, Zuojian FENG2, Lin XIA2 and Luděk BARTOŠ3 1 School of Life and Environment Sciences, Central University for Nationalities, 27 Zhongguancun Nan-da-jie, Beijing 100081, China; e-mail:[email protected] 2 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19 Zhongguancun Road, Beijing 100080, China 3 Ethology Group, Research Institute of Animal Production, P.O.Box 1, 104 01 Praha 10, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Received 30 December 2003; Accepted 8 June 2004 A b s t r a c t . There are five species of musk deer of the genus Moschus, in China, occurring in about 17 provinces. We estimate the total numbers in China to be between 220,000 and 320,000. In some areas the populations are in decline, and some are close to extinction due to over-hunting and habitat loss or degradation, the former being the primary threat to musk deer populations. To conserve musk deer, in situ protection should be improved, and the present unsustainable forest exploitation in the range areas should be halted. Poaching of musk deer, and smuggling of musk deer products, should be prevented. Domestic use of musk should be restricted. In some areas where musk deer have become extinct or are critically endangered, ex situ protection should be introduced. Musk deer farming should be revised and developed according to biological requirements. Key words: musk deer, Moschus, conservation status, China Introduction Musk deer Moschus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhinolophus Affinis Bat ACE2 and Multiple Animal Orthologs Are Functional 2 Receptors for Bat Coronavirus Ratg13 and SARS-Cov-2 3
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.16.385849; this version posted November 17, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 The Rhinolophus affinis bat ACE2 and multiple animal orthologs are functional 2 receptors for bat coronavirus RaTG13 and SARS-CoV-2 3 4 Pei Li1#, Ruixuan Guo1#, Yan Liu1#, Yintgtao Zhang2#, Jiaxin Hu1, Xiuyuan Ou1, Dan 5 Mi1, Ting Chen1, Zhixia Mu1, Yelin Han1, Zhewei Cui1, Leiliang Zhang3, Xinquan 6 Wang4, Zhiqiang Wu1*, Jianwei Wang1*, Qi Jin1*,, Zhaohui Qian1* 7 NHC Key Laboratory of Systems Biology of Pathogens, Institute of Pathogen 8 Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College1, 9 Beijing, 100176, China; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University2, 10 Beijing, China; .Institute of Basic Medicine3, Shandong First Medical University & 11 Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250062, Shandong, China; The 12 Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Science, Beijing Advanced 13 Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for 14 Biological Structure, Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, School of Life 15 Sciences, Tsinghua University4, Beijing, China; 16 17 Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, bat coronavirus RaTG13, spike protein, Rhinolophus affinis 18 bat ACE2, host susceptibility, coronavirus entry 19 20 #These authors contributed equally to this work. 21 *To whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected], 22 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 23 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.16.385849; this version posted November 17, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Coati, White-Nosed - Nasua Narica Page 1 of 19
    BISON-M - Coati, White-nosed - Nasua narica Page 1 of 19 Home Disclaimer Policy Close Window Booklet data last updated on 9/11/2009 Back Print Page Coati, White-nosed Note: If you have any questions, concerns or updates for this species, please click HERE and let us know. Tip: Use Ctrl-F on your keyboard to search for text in this Jump to Section: == Please Select == booklet. Taxonomy Back to top Species IDa 050165 Name Coati, White-nosed Other Common Coatimundi;Coati (Indian Names name);Pizote;El gato solo (Los gatos en familia);Chula;Chulo Category 05 Mammals Elcode AMAJE03010 BLM Code NANA Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Class Mammalia Subclass Theria Click here to search Google for images of this species. Order Carnivora SubOrder Fissipedia Predicted Habitat Family Procyonidae Genus Nasua Species narica Subspecies No Data Submitted Authority (Merriam) Scientific Name Nasua narica Account Type This account represents the entire species, including any and all subspecies recognized in http://bison-m.org/booklet.aspx?id=050165 4/11/2011 BISON-M - Coati, White-nosed - Nasua narica Page 2 of 19 the Southwest. There are no separate subspecies accounts relating to this species. Taxonomic 01, 02, 06, 16, 24, 26, References 33 Click here to explore the map further. Comments on Taxonomy The common Mexican coatimundi --Nasua nasua-- barely enters New Mexico, where it is rare and represented by but a single record *01*. This species is also known as Coati (Indian name), Pizote, El gato solo (Los gatos en familia), Chula, and Chulo (Hass, 1997) *33*. 9/23/93 -- Species name changed to N.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    THE GENERA AND SUBGENERA OF RACCOONS AND THEIR ALLIES. By N. HOLLISTER, Assistant Curator, Division of Mammals, United States National Museum. The family Procyonidae offers a remarkable instance of a group of mammal genera in which the differentiation in the structure of the teeth throughout the series is nearly uniform in degree from genus to genus, and strictly definite in direction from one extreme to the other. Tliis condition is particularly interesting because of the wide difference between the teeth of genera from the extremes of the line, and because the widely diverse cranial and external charac- ters show no special tendency toward serial grouping. EUminating the very aberrant Bassariscus, which clearly does not belong in this series of genera, the superspecific groups remaining within the Procyonidge, when based chiefly on dental characteristics, fall into as weU-ordered a sequence of steps, connecting the Old-World Ailurus with the American Potos, as it would seem possible to find among living animals. (Plate 39.) The one seemingly aberrant cranial feature in Ailurus,^ the presence of the aUsphenoid canal, can not in tliis case be considered a character of family or subfamily importance. The alisphenoid canal in other famiUes of carnivores is known to be absent or present in different genera, in individuals of the same species, or even on the right and left side of the same individual. Of the American groups, Euprocyon is the nearest approach to Ailurus, but if the genera within the family are to be kept of fairly uniform value and degree of differen- tiation, Euprocyon is surely not more than a subgenus of Procyon.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Hose's Civet Diplogale Hosei from Indonesia
    First record of Hose’s Civet Diplogale hosei from Indonesia, and records of other carnivores in the Schwaner Mountains, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia Hiromitsu SAMEJIMA1 and Gono SEMIADI2 Abstract One of the least-recorded carnivores in Borneo, Hose’s Civet Diplogale hosei , was filmed twice in a logging concession, the Katingan–Seruyan Block of Sari Bumi Kusuma Corporation, in the Schwaner Mountains, upper Seruyan River catchment, Central Kalimantan. This, the first record of this species in Indonesia, is about 500 km southwest of its previously known distribution (northern Borneo: Sarawak, Sabah and Brunei). Filmed at 325The m a.s.l., IUCN these Red List records of Threatened are below Species the previously known altitudinal range (450–1,800Prionailurus m). This preliminary planiceps survey forPardofelis medium badia and large and Otter mammals, Civet Cynogalerunning 100bennettii camera-traps in 10 plots for one (Bandedyear, identified Civet Hemigalus in this concession derbyanus 17 carnivores, Arctictis including, binturong on Neofelis diardi, three Endangered Pardofe species- lis(Flat-headed marmorata Cat and Sun Bear Helarctos malayanus, Bay Cat . ) and six Vulnerable species , Binturong , Sunda Clouded Leopard , Marbled Cat Keywords Cynogale bennettii, as well, Pardofelis as Hose’s badia Civet), Prionailurus planiceps Catatan: PertamaBorneo, camera-trapping, mengenai Musang Gunung Diplogale hosei di Indonesia, serta, sustainable karnivora forest management lainnya di daerah Pegunungan Schwaner, Kalimantan Tengah Abstrak Diplogale hosei Salah satu jenis karnivora yang jarang dijumpai di Borneo, Musang Gunung, , telah terekam dua kali di daerah- konsesi hutan Blok Katingan–Seruyan- PT. Sari Bumi Kusuma, Pegunungan Schwaner, di sekitar hulu Sungai Seruya, Kalimantan Tengah. Ini merupakan catatan pertama spesies tersebut terdapat di Indonesia, sekitar 500 km dari batas sebaran yang diketa hui saat ini (Sarawak, Sabah, Brunei).
    [Show full text]
  • MPCP-Q3-Report-Webversion.Pdf
    MARA PREDATOR CONSERVATION PROGRAMME QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPT 2018 MARA PREDATOR CONSERVATION PROGRAMME Q3 REPORT 2018 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During this quarter we started our second lion & cheetah survey of 2018, making it our 9th consecutive time (2x3 months per year) we conduct such surveys. We have now included Enoonkishu Conservancy to our study area. It is only when repeat surveys are conducted over a longer period of time that we will be able to analyse population trends. The methodology we use to estimate densities, which was originally designed by our scientific associate Dr. Nic Elliot, has been accepted and adopted by the Kenya Wildlife Service and will be used to estimate lion densities at a national level. We have started an African Wild Dog baseline study, which will determine how many active dens we have in the Mara, number of wild dogs using them, their demographics, and hopefully their activity patterns and spatial ecology. A paper detailing the identification of key wildlife areas that fall outside protected areas was recently published. Contributors: Niels Mogensen, Michael Kaelo, Kelvin Koinet, Kosiom Keiwua, Cyrus Kavwele, Dr Irene Amoke, Dominic Sakat. Layout and design: David Mbugua Cover photo: Kelvin Koinet Printed in October 2018 by the Mara Predator Conservation Programme Maasai Mara, Kenya www.marapredatorconservation.org 2 MARA PREDATOR CONSERVATION PROGRAMME Q3 REPORT 2018 MARA PREDATOR CONSERVATION PROGRAMME Q3 REPORT 2018 3 CONTENTS FIELD UPDATES .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to Mammals Killed by Motor Vehicles on Vía Del Escobero, Envigado
    Revista EIA, ISSN 1794-1237 / Year XI / Volume 11 / Issue N.22 / July-December 2014 / pp. 137-142 Technical-scientific biannual publication / Escuela de Ingeniería de Antioquia —EIA—, Envigado (Colombia) ADDITIONS TO MAMMALS KILLED BY MOTOR VEHICLES ON VÍA DEL ESCOBERO, ENVIGADO CARLOS A. DELGADO-V. 1 ABSTRACT Vertebrate road kills are a generalized problem around the world, but they are scarcely documented on Colombian highways, especially in peri-urban areas. This study describes the highway mortality of mammals in a six year-period (2008-2013) on Vía del Escobero (Envigado, Antioquia, Colombia). Mammal groups that presented the highest mortality rates were marsupials (54.3%), carnivores (25.7%), and rodents (17.5%). Although there was a lower diversity and fewer individual fatalities than in previous years for the same highway, this study reports a greater number of fatalities for some endangered and unknown species such as Leopardus tigrinus, Puma yag- ouaroundi, and Bassaricyon neblina. This study also added three new species to the road kill list on this highway. KEYWORDS: Road ecology, urban ecology, Medellín, Valle de Aburrá, Valle de San Nicolás ADICIONES AL ATROPELLAMIENTO VEHICULAR DE MAMÍFEROS EN LA VÍA DE EL ESCOBERO, ENVIGADO (ANTIOQUIA), COLOMBIA RESUMEN El atropellamiento vehicular de fauna es un problema generalizado alrededor del Mundo pero escasamente estudiado en las carreteras colombianas, especialmente en áreas periurbanas. Aquí se describe la mortalidad de mamíferos entre los años 2008 a 2013 en la vía El Escobero (Envigado, Antioquia). Los mamíferos más atropella- dos en este periodo fueron los marsupiales (54.3 %), los carnívoros (25.7 %) y los roedores (17.5 %).
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus Arctos and U
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2017 Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus Benjamin James Hillesheim East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Hillesheim, Benjamin James, "Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3261. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3261 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus ____________________________________ A thesis presented to the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences ____________________________________ by Benjamin Hillesheim May 2017 ____________________________________ Dr. Blaine W. Schubert, Chair Dr. Steven C. Wallace Dr. Josh X. Samuels Keywords: Ursidae, Geometric morphometrics, Ursus americanus, Ursus arctos, Last Glacial Maximum ABSTRACT Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus by Benjamin J. Hillesheim Despite being separated by millions of years of evolution, black bears (Ursus americanus) and brown bears (Ursus arctos) can be difficult to distinguish based on skeletal and dental material alone. Complicating matters, some Late Pleistocene U. americanus are significantly larger in size than their modern relatives, obscuring the identification of the two bears.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Distribution, Status, and Research Priorities of Little-Known Small Carnivores in Brazil
    Notes on the distribution, status, and research priorities of little-known small carnivores in Brazil Tadeu G. de OLIVEIRA Abstract Ten species of small carnivores occur in Brazil, including four procyonids, four mustelids (excluding otters), and two mephitids. On the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species eight are assessed as Least Concern and two as Data Deficient. The state of knowledge of small carnivores is low compared to other carnivores: they are among the least known of all mammals in Brazil. The current delineation of Bassaricyon and Galictis congeners appears suspect and not based on credible information. Research needs include understanding dis- tributions, ecology and significant evolutionary units, with emphasis on theAmazon Weasel Mustela africana. Keywords: Amazon weasel, Data Deficient, Olingo, Crab-eating Raccoon, Hog-nosed Skunk Notas sobre la distribución, estado y prioridades de investigación de los pequeños carnívoros de Brasil Resumen En Brasil ocurren diez especies de pequeños carnívoros, incluyendo cuatro prociónidos, cuatro mustélidos (excluyendo nutrias) y dos mephitidos. De acuerdo a la Lista Roja de Especies Amenazadas de la UICN, ocho especies son evaluadas como de Baja Preocupación (LC) y dos son consideradas Deficientes de Datos (DD). El estado de conocimiento de los pequeños carnívoros es bajo comparado con otros carnívoros y se encuentran entre los mamíferos menos conocidos de Brasil. La delineación congenérica actual de Bassaricyon y Galictis parece sospechosa y no basada en información confiable. Las necesidades de investigación incluyen el entendimiento de las distribuciones, ecología y unidades evolutivas significativas, con énfasis en la ComadrejaAmazónica Mustela africana. Palabras clave: Comadreja Amazónica, Deficiente de Datos, Mapache Cangrejero, Olingo, Zorrillo Introduction 1999), but recently has been recognised (e.g.
    [Show full text]