Escalante Valley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Escalante Valley 1 13 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR 2 PROPOSED SOLAR ENERGY ZONES IN UTAH 3 4 5 13.1 ESCALANTE VALLEY 6 7 8 13.1.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 9 10 11 13.1.1.1 General Information 12 13 The proposed Escalante Valley solar energy zone (SEZ) is located in Iron County in 14 southwestern Utah (Figure 13.1.1.1-1). The SEZ has a total area of 6,614 acres (27 km2). In 15 2008, the county population was 45,833, while adjacent Washington County to the south had a 16 population of 148,256. The largest nearby town is Cedar City on Interstate 15 (I-15) in Iron 17 County; Cedar City had a 2008 population of 28,667 and is located about 30 mi (48 km) to the 18 east-southeast. Several small towns are located closer to the SEZ; Lund is about 4 mi (6 km) to 19 the north, and Zane is about 5 mi (8 km) to the west. Salt Lake City is located about 220 mi 20 (354 km) to the north–northeast. 21 22 The nearest major road is State Route 56, about 15 mi (24 km) south of the SEZ. Access 23 to the Escalante Valley SEZ is via county road; Lund Highway passes northeast of the SEZ. 24 Access to the interior of the SEZ is by dirt roads. The Union Pacific (UP) Railroad passes to the 25 west and has a rail stop in Lund. A rail spur off the main line at Lund passes through the 26 northeastern edge of the SEZ. Both state and private lands are nearby. The nearest public airport 27 is the Cedar City Regional Airport near Cedar City. A 138-kV transmission line ends about 3 mi 28 (5 km) from the southeastern area of the southernmost part of the SEZ. 29 30 As of February 2010, there were no right-of-way (ROW) applications for solar projects 31 within the SEZ. 32 33 The proposed Escalante Valley SEZ is in a rural area. The overall character of the 34 surrounding land is rural. The SEZ is located in the south-central portion of the Escalante Desert, 35 a large, southwest–northeast trending valley. The Escalante Desert is bounded by the Mineral 36 Mountains to the northeast, the Black Mountains and the Antelope Range to the south and 37 southeast, and the Shauntie Hills and Wah Wah Mountains to the northwest. Land within the 38 SEZ is undeveloped scrubland characteristic of a high-elevation, semiarid basin. 39 40 The proposed Escalante Valley SEZ and other relevant information are shown in 41 Figure 13.1.1.1-1. The criteria used to identify the proposed Escalante Valley SEZ in Utah as an 42 appropriate location for solar energy development included proximity to existing transmission 43 lines or designated corridors, proximity to existing roads, a slope of generally less than 2%, and 44 an area of more than 2,500 acres (10 km2). In addition, the area was identified as being relatively 45 free of other types of conflicts, such as U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)-designated 46 critical habitat for threatened and endangered species, Areas of Critical Environmental Concern Draft Solar PEIS 13.1-1 December 2010 1 2 FIGURE 13.1.1.1-1 Proposed Escalante Valley SEZ Draft Solar PEIS 13.1-2 December 2010 1 (ACECs), Special Recreation Management Areas (SRMAs), and National Landscape 2 Conservation System (NLCS) lands (see Section 2.2.2.2 for the complete list of exclusions). 3 Although these classes of restricted lands were excluded from the proposed Escalante Valley 4 SEZ, other restrictions may be appropriate. The analyses in the following sections evaluate the 5 affected environment and potential impacts associated with utility-scale solar energy 6 development in the proposed SEZ for important environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic 7 resources. 8 9 As initially announced in the Federal Register on June 30, 2009, the proposed Escalante 10 Valley SEZ encompassed 6,581 acres (27 km2). Subsequent to the study area scoping period, 11 the boundaries of the proposed SEZ were altered somewhat to facilitate the Bureau of Land 12 Management’s (BLM’s) administration of the SEZ area. Borders with irregularly shaped 13 boundaries were adjusted to match the section boundaries of the Public Lands Survey System 14 (PLSS) (BLM and USFS 2010a). Some small, higher slope areas internal to and at the borders 15 of the site were also added to the SEZ; although included in the SEZ, these higher slope areas 16 would not likely be utilized for solar facilities. The revised SEZ is approximately 33 acres 17 (0.13 km2) larger than the original SEZ as published in June 2009. 18 19 20 13.1.1.2 Development Assumptions for the Impact Analysis 21 22 Maximum solar development of the proposed Escalante Valley SEZ is assumed to be 23 80% of the SEZ area over a period of 20 years, a maximum of 5,291 acres (21 km2). These 24 values are shown in Table 13.1.1.2-1, along with other development assumptions. Full 25 development of the Escalante Valley SEZ would allow development of facilities with an 26 estimated total of 588 MW of electrical power capacity if power tower, dish engine, or 27 photovoltaic (PV) technologies were used, assuming 9 acres/MW (0.04 km2/MW) of land 28 required, and an estimated 1,058 MW of power if solar trough technologies were used, 29 assuming 5 acres/MW (0.02 km2/MW) of land required. 30 31 Availability of transmission from SEZs to load centers will be an important consideration 32 for future development in SEZs. The nearest existing transmission line is a 138-kV line 3 mi 33 (5 km) southeast of the SEZ. It is possible that this existing line could be used to provide access 34 from the SEZ to the transmission grid, but the 138-kV capacity of that line would be inadequate 35 for 588 to 1,058 MW of new capacity (a 500-kV line can approximately accommodate the load 36 of one 700-MW facility). At full build-out capacity, it is clear that new transmission and/or 37 upgrades of existing transmission lines would be required to bring electricity from the proposed 38 Escalante Valley SEZ to load centers; however, at this time the location and size of such new 39 transmission facilities are unknown. Generic impacts of transmission and associated 40 infrastructure construction and of line upgrades for various resources are discussed in Chapter 5. 41 Project-specific analyses would need to identify the specific impacts of new transmission 42 construction and line upgrades for any projects proposed within the SEZ. 43 44 To evaluate locations and amount of disturbed acreage for new transmission lines, it was 45 assumed that a transmission line segment would be constructed from the proposed Escalante 46 Valley SEZ to the nearest existing transmission line to connect the SEZ to the transmission Draft Solar PEIS 13.1-3 December 2010 TABLE 13.1.1.2-1 Proposed Escalante Valley SEZAssumed Development Acreages, Maximum Solar MW Output, Access Roads, and Transmission Line ROWs Assumed Total Acreage Assumed Distance and Area of Distance to and Assumed Maximum SEZ Distance to Capacity of Transmission Nearest Developed Output for Nearest State, Nearest Existing Line ROW Designated Acreage Various Solar U.S. or Interstate Transmission and Road Transmission (80% of Total) Technologies Highway Line ROW Corridore 6,614 acres and 588 MWb and State Route 56: 3 mi and 138 kV 91 acres and 4 mi 5,291 acresa 1,058 MWc 15 mid 109 acres a To convert acres to km2, multiply by 0.004047. b Maximum power output if the SEZ were fully developed using power tower, dish engine, or PV technologies, assuming 9 acres/MW (0.04 km2/MW) of land required. c Maximum power output if the SEZ were fully developed using solar trough technologies, assuming 5 acres/MW (0.02 km2/MW) of land required. d To convert mi to km, multiply by 1.609. e BLM-designated corridors are developed for federal land use planning purposes only and are not applicable to state-owned or privately owned land. 1 2 3 grid. This assumption was made without additional information on whether the nearest 4 existing transmission line would actually be available for connection of future solar facilities. 5 Establishing a connection to the line closest to the Escalante Valley SEZ would involve the 6 construction of about 3 mi (5 km) of new transmission line outside of the SEZ. The ROW for 7 this transmission line would occupy approximately 91 acres (0.37 km2) of land, assuming a 8 250-ft (76-m) wide ROW, a typical width for such an ROW. If a connecting transmission line 9 was constructed in the future to connect facilities within the SEZ to a different offsite grid 10 location from the one assumed here, site developers would need to determine the impacts from 11 construction and operation of that line. In addition, developers would need to determine the 12 impacts of line upgrades if they were needed. 13 14 State Route 56 lies about 15 mi (24 km) to the southeast of the proposed Escalante Valley 15 SEZ. Assuming construction of a new access road to reach State Route 56 would be needed to 16 support construction and operation of solar facilities, approximately 109 acres (0.44 km2) of land 17 disturbance would occur (a 60-ft [18.3-m] wide ROW is assumed).
Recommended publications
  • IRON COUNTY COMMISSION MEETING January 12, 2015
    IRON COUNTY COMMISSION MEETING January 12, 2015 Minutes ofthe Iron County Commission meeting convened at 9:00a.m. January 12, 2015 in Commission Chambers at the Iron County Courthouse, Parowan, Utah. Officers in attendance included: David J. Miller Commission Chair Alma L. Adams Commissioner Dale M. Brinkerhoff Commissioner G. Michael Edwards Deputy County Attorney Jonathan T. Whittaker County Clerk Also present: Stephen Platt County Engineer Cindy W. Bulloch County Assessor Leslie Bishop Human Resources Director Bruce Anderson Landfill Supervisor SYNOPSIS AGREEMENT FOR RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT GRANT ... ... ... ........... 4 ADJOURN ... 9 APPROVAL OF MINUTES ...... ...................................... ................ .............. .............. ........ ........... 2 BOARD APPOINTMENTS .. ........ ......... ....... .. .... ............ ................. ...... .. ....................... ........ .. .. .... 3 DISCUSSION OF NIGHT HUNTING ORDINANCE ................................... ..... .. ........ .... ............ 7 DISCUSSION OF THE USE OF COUNTY CREDIT CARDS ................................... .. ................ 3 PERSONNEL MATTERS ............ .. .. .. ................. .. .. ..... .................. ... .............. ............ ... ............ ..... 2 PRAIRIE DOG MATTERS ................ ................. ................................... ..................... ................... 3 PUBLIC COMMENTS ........ ...................... .................... ........................ .. ................ .. ... ... .... .......
    [Show full text]
  • North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave
    North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave http://www.desertusa.com/desert.html In most modern classifications, the deserts of the United States and northern Mexico are grouped into four distinct categories. These distinctions are made on the basis of floristic composition and distribution -- the species of plants growing in a particular desert region. Plant communities, in turn, are determined by the geologic history of a region, the soil and mineral conditions, the elevation and the patterns of precipitation. Three of these deserts -- the Chihuahuan, the Sonoran and the Mojave -- are called "hot deserts," because of their high temperatures during the long summer and because the evolutionary affinities of their plant life are largely with the subtropical plant communities to the south. The Great Basin Desert is called a "cold desert" because it is generally cooler and its dominant plant life is not subtropical in origin. Chihuahuan Desert: A small area of southeastern New Mexico and extreme western Texas, extending south into a vast area of Mexico. Great Basin Desert: The northern three-quarters of Nevada, western and southern Utah, to the southern third of Idaho and the southeastern corner of Oregon. According to some, it also includes small portions of western Colorado and southwestern Wyoming. Bordered on the south by the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts. Mojave Desert: A portion of southern Nevada, extreme southwestern Utah and of eastern California, north of the Sonoran Desert. Sonoran Desert: A relatively small region of extreme south-central California and most of the southern half of Arizona, east to almost the New Mexico line.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual Report 2014-2015 Annual Report Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 2 New Areas of Focus ......................................................................................................................... 2 WWA Staff and Research Team ....................................................................................................... 2 WWA 2014-2015 Program Highlights ....................................................................................... 4 Major Research Findings .................................................................................................................. 4 Select Outreach Activities ................................................................................................................ 5 Narrative Examples of Decision Contexts Informed by WWA Work .................................................. 6 WWA 2014-2015 Publication Highlights .................................................................................. 8 WWA Metrics of Success ......................................................................................................... 8 WWA 2014-2015 Project Reports .......................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX A: List of 2014-2015 WWA Publications ................................................................ 18 APPENDIX B: WWA Appearances in Media ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Episodic Dust Events of Utah's Wasatch
    1654 JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY VOLUME 51 Episodic Dust Events of Utah’s Wasatch Front and Adjoining Region W. JAMES STEENBURGH AND JEFFREY D. MASSEY Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah THOMAS H. PAINTER Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California (Manuscript received 4 January 2012, in final form 4 April 2012) ABSTRACT Episodic dust events cause hazardous air quality along Utah’s Wasatch Front and dust loading of the snowpack in the adjacent Wasatch Mountains. This paper presents a climatology of episodic dust events of the Wasatch Front and adjoining region that is based on surface weather observations from the Salt Lake City International Airport (KSLC), Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) imag- ery, and additional meteorological datasets. Dust events at KSLC—defined as any day [mountain standard time (MST)] with at least one report of a dust storm, blowing dust, and/or dust in suspension with a visi- bility of 10 km or less—average 4.3 per water year (WY: October–September), with considerable in- terannual variability and a general decline in frequency during the 1930–2010 observational record. The distributions of monthly dust-event frequency and total dust flux are bimodal, with primary and secondary maxima in April and September, respectively. Dust reports are most common in the late afternoon and evening. An analysis of the 33 most recent (2001–10 WY) events at KSLC indicates that 11 were associated with airmass convection, 16 were associated with a cold front or baroclinic trough entering Utah from the west or northwest, 4 were associated with a stationaryorslowlymovingfrontorbaroclinictroughwestof Utah, and 2 were associated with other synoptic patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • See for Details and How to Win a Limited Edition Full Curl Rifle
    200 Trophy Permits • $5 per Permit Application FEBRUARY 9–12, 2012 Salt Palace Convention Center Salt Lake City 200 Trophy Permits • $5 per Permit Application J AďLY NOW FOR $5 DRAWINGFEBRUARY FOR 200 BIG GAME 9–12, PERMITS 2012 K SpecialSpecial Salt Palace Convention Center Salt Lake City ThanksThanks J AďLY NOW FOR $5 DRAWING FOR 200 BIG GAME PERMITS K toto ourour TitleTitle 2017 AUCTION SponsorsSponsors 5 CATALOG www.AMMOANDMORESTORE.com THOSE WHO MAKE IT HAPPEN Welcome Sportsmen and Sportswomen! Welcome to the 11th Annual Western Hunting & Conservation Expo. Sportsmen for Fish & Wildlife and the Emmett Burroughs – Mule Deer Foundation Founder Sportsmen for Fish & Wildlife Board of Directors Don Peay – Founder Mule Deer Foundation are excited to bring you this very special hunting and conservation show. Your attendance Mule Deer Foundation Board of Directors Dave Woodhouse – Chairman and purchases help ensure the conservation of our wildlife and wild lands and the future of our hunting and sporting Brian Fienhold – Chairman of the Board Kevin Pritchett – Vice Chairman heritage. Thank you for joining us. Bethany Erb – Vice-Chair of the Board Rusty Aiken Ryan Bronson Brayden Richmond We are proud of how far the Expo has grown the past 11 years and this year promises to be spectacular. Our four- CJ Buck Kurt Wood Aaron Oelger day event features over 375 exhibits offering the finest guides, outfitters, professional hunters, artists, taxidermists, Erik Craythorne Jim Steadman jewelers, furriers and purveyors of fine guns, knives, optics, clothing and sporting equipment for the discerning Bob Jacobs sportsman and sportswoman. Kirstie Pike SFW Mission Fulfillment Board Art Reese Troy Justensen – Mission Fulfillment Board Chairman Daniel Harrison Dave Woodhouse – Vice Chairman/Utah Co.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of OREM CITY COUNCIL MEETING 56 North State Street, Orem, Utah May 26, 2020
    CITY OF OREM CITY COUNCIL MEETING 56 North State Street, Orem, Utah May 26, 2020 This meeting may be held electronically to allow a Councilmember to participate. NOTICE OF ALL-ELECTRONIC MEETING & PUBLIC COMMENTS To minimize the potential spread of COVID-19, and as authorized by Utah Governor Gary Herbert’s March 18, 2020 Executive Order, the Orem City Council meeting on May 26, 2020 will be an all-electronic meeting. There will be no public access to the Orem City Council chambers. Those desiring to view or participate in the meeting must do so electronically. Those wishing to make comment should submit through: orem.org/comments OR [email protected] Comments will be accepted before and during the meeting. All comments received will be read into the record during the live meeting. Once an item has been voted on, that item will be closed to additional comments. The live meeting event may be streamed at orem.org/meetings. Thank you for your cooperation during these challenging times. 3:30 P.M. WORK SESSION - CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM DISCUSSION - CARE Deliberations (30 minutes) Deliberations Presenter: Steven Downs DISCUSSION - Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement (10 min) Review and Discussion of the Amended Interlocal Agreement with Utah Risk Management Agency Presenter: Jamie Davidson First Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement v.5 (Clean) (002).docx DISCUSSION - Recycling Market Update (30 min) Review and Discussion Presenter: Brenn Bybee and Brad Mertz, President of Recycling Coalition of Utah (RCU) DISCUSSION - Southwest Area General Plan review (30 min) 1 Staff will review and discuss comments and suggestions received from the digital neighborhood meeting held on May 13, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranch Creek Watershed and Riparian Improvement Project
    Ranch Creek Watershed United States Department of and Riparian Improvement Agriculture Forest Service Project Intermountain Region Environmental Assessment Dixie National Forest Escalante Ranger District January 2017 Environmental Assessment Title Page Photo Description: For More Information Contact: Terry DeLay Escalante Ranger District P.O. Box 246 Escalante, UT 84726 Phone: (435) 826-5401 Email: [email protected] Fax: (435) 826-5491 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Escalante Valley Solar Energy Zone
    Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Escalante Valley Solar Energy Zone Participating Tribes Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, Ibapah, Utah Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, Cedar City, Utah Ethnography and Ethnographic Synthesis For Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Solar Energy Study Areas in Portions of Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah By Richard W. Stoffle Kathleen A. Van Vlack Hannah Z. Johnson Phillip T. Dukes Stephanie C. De Sola Kristen L. Simmons Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology School of Anthropology University of Arizona October 2011 Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 1 ESCALANTE VALLEY The proposed Escalante Valley solar energy zone (SEZ) is located in Iron County, Utah (Figure 1). It is approximately four miles south of Lund, Utah and ten miles east of Beryl, Utah. The SEZ is situated in the Escalante Valley, which is a large, southwest-northeast trending valley in the south-central portion of the Escalante Desert. Figure 1 Google Earth Image of the Escalante Valley SEZ Outlined in Red and SEZ American Indian Study Area The Escalante Valley SEZ American Indian study area extends beyond the boundaries of the SEZ because of the existence of cultural resources in the surrounding landscape. The Escalante Valley SEZ American Indian study area includes plant and animal communities, geological features, water sources, historic events and the trails that would have connected these features. Southern Paiute and Goshute representatives maintain that, in order to understand Numic connections to the SEZ, it must be placed in context with neighboring connected places including the Milford Flats South and Wah Wah Valley SEZs and their associated cultural resources found in the larger study areas.
    [Show full text]
  • October-9-2019
    WEDNESDAY, OCT INSIDE... OBER 9, 2019 FIND YOUR Hallow HALLOWEEN een COLORING 2019 BOOK! VOL. 11 NO. 45 Sports IRONCOUNTYTODAY.COM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2019 Rams 4 Opinion cruise 11 Showcase past 19 Life North 28 Sports Sevier, 32 Classifieds 40-12 35 Comics/Puzzles of MONSTERS & MUD A nnual Cedar Fire Department Fundraiser Haunts Cross Hollow More on Page 12… COREY BAUMGARTNER 2 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2019 NEWS IRON COUNTY TODAY A LLEGED ATTEMPTED CHILD ABDUCTION PREVENTED from Sergeant Clint POLLOCK suspect and the tractor-trailer he FOR IRON COUNTY TODAY was driving. Officers on scene had Cedar Communications broadcast CEDAR CITY – At approxi- an Attempt to Locate (ATL) for mately 6:56 p.m., on October 1, 2019, the suspects tractor-trailer. A the Cedar City Police Department Utah Highway Patrol Trooper C OURTESY OF USF responded to an alleged attempted in Washington County located child abduction in the trac- the suspected vehicle in the tor-trailer parking lot at Love’s area of mile marker 13 on I15 in Travel Stop located at Washington County Lawsuit against 2645 N Canyon Ranch and took custody of Dr. Initial information SUSPECT the suspect. was given that an The suspect was Utah Shakespeare eight-year-old girl FOUND, transported to the was in a tractor-trailer Cedar City Police waiting for her PLACED IN Department where Festival is dismissed father to return from CUSTODY he was interviewed getting food, when a by a detective and by Nikki KOONTZ share their artistic passions and help suspect entered the released. We are not SUU MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS cultivate the future generation of driver’s door of the tractor-trailer looking for any other suspects artists.” and attempted to grab her.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside... Wednesday, August 21, 2019 Stewart Takes on Youth Suicide Prevention Efforts in Utah
    INSIDE... WEDNESDAY, A STEWART TAKES UGUST 21, 2019 ON YOUTH SUICIDE PREVENTION EFFORTS IN UTAH VOL. 11 NO. 38 Life IRONCOUNTYTODAY.COM WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 21, 2019 4 Opinion Jessica 9 Showcase Sahagun 12 Life Named 20 Sports Miss Iron 23 Classifieds County 27 Comics/Puzzles SO ESORT BRIAN HEAD R is still the perfect get-a-way for the day or weekend. Bring the family and take a spectacular scenic chairlift ride or an exciting zip-line ride before enjoying some delicious PEAKN SEA Kansas City Style BBQ or a yummy freshly grilled burger or hot dog. Let the kids show off their climbing skills on our Cliff Hanger Climbing Wall or their gymnastic ability on the Peak Shot Bungee Trampoline before practicing their aim at the Crooked Arrow Archery Range. There is even some snow tubing fun without the snow at our Avalanche Tubing Hill, or play a round of Disc Golf with the most breathtaking views imaginable. These are just some of the fun things available every weekend at Brian Head Resort. Be sure to check www.brainhead.com for our complete summer season and event schedule! COREY BAUMGARTNER 2 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 21, 2019 NEWS IRON COUNTY TODAY CEDAR CITY PRIMARY ELECTION RESULTS by Kelsey KEENER candidate who is most willing and recognize the value in having proven who voted and the support,” he said. IRON COUNTY TODAY able to reach across two opposing experience and leadership. Thank “We look forward to the general views and try to find places where you to everyone for your wonderful election in November.” The Municipal Primary Election the common ground lies.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Kane County, Utah Centennial County History Series
    A HISTORY OF <Kam County Martha Sonntag Bradley UTAH CENTENNIAL COUNTY HISTORY SERIES A HISTORY OF County Martha Sonntag Bradley Kane County is noted for some of the most beautiful—though often inhospitable—land in Utah and has been home to resourceful humans for thousands of years. It was outside the area of first Mormon settlement and was actually created in the early 1860s before many had moved to the area. After the Black Hawk War, settlers soon moved to favorable locations such as Kanab and Long Valley, establishing towns in the isolated region north of the Arizona Strip with economies based on ranching and timber harvesting. With the improvement of area roads and communications in the twentieth century, more people became aware of the scenic splen­ dor of the county, and tourism and movie making began to increase, Kanab even be­ coming known as Utah's Little Hollywood during the heyday of filmmaking. Traditional extractive uses of the land's resources have declined in recent years, but the recent cre­ ation of the Grand Staircase-Escalante Na­ tional Monument has brought the promise of increased tourism to the area. It also has sparked opposition from many who had hoped for coal mining development in the region. Issues of control and uses of public lands promise to be debated vigorously as the county enters the new millenium. ISBN: 0-913738-40-9 A HISTORY OF cKgne County A HISTORY OF JOme County Martha Sonntag Bradley 1999 Utah State Historical Society Kane County Commission Copyright © 1999 by Kane County Commission All rights
    [Show full text]
  • Youth and the Mountains
    YOUTHYOUTH AND AND THETHE MOUNTAINSMOUNTAINS StudentStudent Essays Essays on Sustainable on Sustainable Mountain Mountain Development Development Volume I 2013 Editorial Board Editor-in-Chief: Dr. David R. Connelly History & Political Science Chair Assistant Editor/Administrative Support: Kimberly Williamson Utah Valley University Faculty: Dr. Keith Snedegar, Professor of History Dr. Baktybek Abdrisaev, Lecturer in Political Science Dr. Michael Minch, Associate Professor of Philosophy and director of Peace and Justice Studies Sara Ulloa, Assistant Professor of Languages Community Support: Robin Bucaria, teacher from Copper Hills High School in West Jordan, Utah Utah Valley University Students: Jordan Giles Jesler Molina Mark Petersen Utah Valley University 800 University Parkway Mailstop 185 Orem, Utah 84058 801-863-8487 YOUTH AND THE MOUNTAINS Student Essays on Sustainable Mountain Development The following essays are on a variety of themes that relate to sustain- able mountain development, both at home in Utah and around the - gions, alternative energy production, political arrangements, and the importanceworld. They of cover women such in variedmountainous topics ascommunities. conflict in mountainous This volume rein- cludes essays that were written by students at Utah Valley University and also includes essays written by local high school students who competed in the Utah High School Essay contest, held in 2011, 2012 and 2013. Table of Contents Introduction: Dr. David Connelly………………...………………..1 Introductory Essay: “Sustainability
    [Show full text]