Field Guide for Managing Yellow Starthistle in the Southwest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Field Guide for Managing Yellow Starthistle in the Southwest United States Department of Agriculture Field Guide for Managing Yellow Starthistle in the Southwest Forest Southwestern Service Region TP-R3-16-07 September 2014 Cover Photos Top left: Steve Dewey, Utah State University, Bugwood.org Top right: Steve Dewey, Utah State University, Bugwood.org Left center: Steve Dewey, Utah State Univeristy, Bugwood.org Bottom left: Cindy Roche, Bugwood.org Bottom right: Forest Service The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper Yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.) Sunflower family (Asteraceae) Yellow starthistle is an invasive plant that has been listed • Buds with spiny bracts form in June or July; each as a noxious weed in Arizona and New Mexico. This field bract has a central spine up to 2 inches long with 2 to guide serves as the U.S. Forest Service’s recommendations 3 pairs of lateral spines. for management of yellow starthistle in forests, woodlands, • Flowers May to December; yellow flowers borne at rangelands, and deserts associated with its Southwestern tips or in axils of winged stems. Region. The Southwestern Region covers Arizona and New Mexico, which together have 11 national forests. • Reproduces solely via seed; two types of smooth The Region also includes four national grasslands located seed—one type is lighter in color with a pappus of in northeastern New Mexico, western Oklahoma, and the barbed bristles, the other is darker without a pappus. Texas panhandle. • Leaves and stem become straw colored as seeds form; flower head becomes straw colored when seeds are mature; seeds are viable for up to 10 years. Description Yellow starthistle (synonyms: golden starthistle, St. Ecology Barnaby’s thistle, yellow cockspur) is an early maturing Impacts/threats winter annual. Native to Eurasia, it was introduced into Yellow starthistle is highly competitive and often develops North America as a seed contaminant in the mid-1850s dense, impenetrable stands that lower the diversity of and has persistently spread across the western United desirable flora and fauna species. The presence of sharp long States. It is found in foothill regions of southwestern New spines on seed heads of yellow starthistle degrades livestock Mexico and elsewhere in deserts, uplands, rangelands, and grazing, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities. mountainous areas of the Southwest. Yellow starthistle is When forced to graze mature yellow starthistle, livestock similar in appearance to two closely related species: C. (especially horses) can be affected by an incurable melitensis (Malta starthistle) and C. sulphurea (Sicilian neurological disorder known as “chewing disease.” A starthistle). neurotoxic sesquiterpene lactone in starthistles called repin is believed to be the underlying cause of the disorder. Growth Characteristics However, animals in general typically avoid the weed • Grey-green to blue-green, herbaceous plant covered because of the sharp spines and hairs. in fine, white cottony hairs. Location • Winter annual and occasional biennial; germinates fall to spring. Yellow starthistle prefers well-drained soils, hot dry summers, and 10 to 60 inches of precipitation. It occurs • Stout, rapidly growing, vigorous taproot; may grow in open woodlands, desert scrub, chaparral, rangeland, deeper than 36 inches. pastures, waste areas, cropland, and roadsides that generally • Rosette in fall/winter; deeply lobed leaves appear lie below 7,500 feet in elevation. It is commonly found ruffled; fine, cottony hairs. around residential subdivisions, agricultural land, and • Bolts May to June; stiff, openly-branched stems; 6 to recreation areas throughout the Western States. 60 inches tall; large stem wings. Spread • Leaves alternate, linear to oblanceolate; margins When unassisted, yellow starthistle seed rarely moves far smooth, toothed, or wavy. from the parent plant. However, seed easily attaches to fur, 1 hair, or clothing; and it can be transported over far distances Table 1 summarizes management options for controlling by adhering to tires and undercarriages of road vehicles and yellow starthistle under various situations. Choice of equipment. Yellow starthistle seed may also be introduced individual control method(s) for starthistle depends on many into new areas through transported hay that is not certified local factors including degree of infestation, current land to be weed free. use, and site conditions (terrain, accessibility for treatment, microclimate, nontarget flora and fauna present, etc.). Other Invasive Features important considerations include treatment effectiveness, Yellow starthistle is a prolific seed producer and within overall cost, and the number of years needed to achieve dense stands can produce 50 to 100 million seeds per acre. control. Typically, more than one control method may be It is highly adaptable to environmental variation and grows needed for a particular site. rapidly. This allows yellow starthistle to out-compete native plant species for sunlight, space, water, and nutrients. Other Physical Control features that facilitate invasiveness include a deep taproot Yellow starthistle reproduces solely by seed, so physical that accesses available soil moisture, winged stems that methods should focus on reducing seed production and dissipate heat, and formidable spines at maturity that deter preventing seed germination. These methods usually have to grazing by livestock or wildlife. be repeated and must be timed properly to be most effective. Manual Methods Management Hand pulling or hoeing are most effective in a maintenance In many cases, 3 or more years of intensive management program for an area where yellow starthistle is relatively may be necessary to significantly reduce a yellow starthistle sparse. Take care to remove as much of the taproot as population. Early detection and eradication soon after possible. Anticipate that hand removal will need to be discovery will increase the possibility for control of a repeated in about 2 weeks to remove missed plants or those starthistle population. A high priority should be treatment maturing at a later time. Care should be taken to minimize of small or sporadic infestations on otherwise healthy soil disturbance and to properly dispose of plant debris by sites, which can then be shifted to larger infestations. The bagging and/or burning. following actions should be considered when planning a Mechanical Methods management approach to control starthistle: In suitable terrain, tillage in early summer with a plow or • Maintain healthy plant communities to suppress or disc that is repeated at a later time (about 4 to 6 weeks) can limit the impact of a starthistle infestation. effectively bury yellow starthistle plant parts. A harrow, • Incorporate sound grazing management with any knife, or drag pulled behind a tractor can be used to cut and control strategy. separate shoots from roots of larger mature plants. These methods are most commonly used in agronomic or roadside • Map known infestations and keep annual records of settings and should only be used when the soil surface is dry reported infestations. since fragmented plant segments in moist soils will regrow • Combine mechanical, cultural, biological, and and possibly magnify the problem. chemical methods to control yellow starthistle populations whenever possible. Mowing is a commonly used control technique for yellow starthistle along roadsides and in recreational areas. • Include monitoring and a followup treatment plan for Although it can be a cost-effective method for starthistle missed plants and seedlings. control, mowing is not feasible in many locations due to 2 Table 1. Management Options* Site Physical Methods Cultural Methods Biological Methods Chemical Methods Roadsides Use repeated, shallow Educate road crews to identify and Consider using weevils or Use truck spraying cultivation and/or report infestations along roads; rust fungus as biological equipment to apply mowing throughout implement requirements for vehicle control agents (see table 2). herbicide during early germination and operations in infested areas. Effectiveness of agents may growth. Clean equipment growing periods. be limited due to possible to prevent spread. Gravel and other road materials disturbances in agent life cycles transported into uninfested areas from roadside operations. should be weed free. Rangelands Use repeated, shallow Use certified weed-free hay and Use prescribed grazing For extensive and dense cultivation and/or seed. during spring with an intense, infestations, use ground mowing throughout short-duration approach in or aerial broadcast After passing through infested areas
Recommended publications
  • Yellow Starthistle Management with Grazing, Mowing, and Competitive Plantings
    California Exotic Pest Plant Council 1996 Symposium Proceedings Yellow Starthistle Management with Grazing, Mowing, and Competitive Plantings Craig D. Thomsen, William A. Williams, and Marc P. Vayssieres Dept. of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 1. Using livestock to manage yellow starthistle in annual grasslands Introduction Livestock grazing has been recognized as a major driving force for noxious weed invasions in pastures and on rangeland (Parker 1949). Livestock alter botanical composition and contribute to weed proliferation by reducing plant cover, dispersing seed, concentrating nutrients, compacting soil, and selective grazing (Burcham 1957). Many weeds that occur on grazing land possess anti-herbivore traits such as spines, stiff awns, high silica and lignin content, or secondary compounds such as alkaloids and glandular exudates. Because animals selectively graze some plants and avoid others, species that have grazing deterrents are favored on grazing lands and often increase relative to those eaten by livestock. Paradoxically, some noxious weeds that flourish on grazing lands have some stages of growth that are palatable to livestock, and with alterations in grazing management, can be suppressed by livestock. For example, medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) (Lusk et al. 1961), Klamath weed (Hypericum perforatum) (Murphy et al. 1954), spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) (Kelsey and Mikalovich 1987), leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) (Johnston and Peake 1960), tansy ragwort (Senecio jacobaea) (Mosher 1979) and yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) (Thomsen et al. 1993) have all been suppressed by livestock grazing. Some invasive species are absent from grazing land because they are highly palatable to livestock. In maritime areas, the palatable sweet fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) can reach dominant status in ungrazed grasslands, but is usually entirely absent from adjacent grazed land.
    [Show full text]
  • Senior Softball World Championships 2020 St
    Senior Softball World Championships 2020 St. George, Utah September 17 - 19, 2020 Rev. 08/28/2020 Men's 60+ Major Plus Division • 4 Teams Win Loss 3 0 1 LPC 60's/Dudley (CA) 122Omega IT Services, LLC (VA) 0 3 3 Samurai (CA) 2 1 4 Texas Crush Sixties Thursday • September 17, 2020 • The Canyons Softball Complex • St. George Field address ► 1890 West 2000 North - St George, UT 84770 Time # Runs Team Name Field # Runs Team Name 9:30 AM 317 Samurai (CA) 2132 LPC 60's/Dudley (CA) 11:00 AM 220 Omega IT Services, LLC (VA) 2426 Texas Crush Sixties 12:30 PM 423 Texas Crush Sixties 23 7 Samurai (CA) USA NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME • LPC 60's/Dudley (West) vs. Omega IT Services, LLC (East) 2:00 PM 124 LPC 60's/Dudley (CA) 22 8 Omega IT Services, LLC (VA) Friday • September 18, 2020 • The Canyons Softball Complex • St. George Time # Runs Team Name Field # Runs Team Name 12:30 PM 226 Omega IT Services, LLC (VA) 6311 Samurai (CA) 12:30 PM 130 LPC 60's/Dudley (CA) 7429 Texas Crush Sixties Seeding for 60-Major Plus Double Elimination bracket commencing Friday afternoon • See bracket for details Format: Full (3-game) Round Robin to seed 60-Major+ Double Elimination bracket Home Runs - Major+ = 9 per team per game, Outs NOTE SSUSA Official Rulebook §9.5 (Retrieving Home Run Balls) will be strictly enforced. Pitch Count - All batters start with 1-1 count (WITH courtesy foul) per SSUSA Rulebook §6.2 (Pitch Count) Run Rules - 7 runs per ½ inning at bat (except open inning) Time Limits - RR = 65 + open inn.
    [Show full text]
  • Thistle Identification Referee 2017
    Thistle Identification Referee 2017 Welcome to the Thistle Identification Referee. The purpose of the referee is to review morphological characters that are useful for identification of thistle and knapweed fruits, as well as review useful resources for making decisions on identification and classification of species as noxious weed seeds. Using the Identification Guide for Some Common and Noxious Thistle and Knapweed Fruits (Meyer 2017) and other references of your choosing, please answer the questions below (most are multiple choice). Use the last page of this document as your answer sheet for the questions. Please send your answer sheet to Deborah Meyer via email ([email protected]) by May 26, 2017. Be sure to fill in your name, lab name, and email address on the answer sheet to receive CE credit. 1. In the Asteraceae, the pappus represents this floral structure: a. Modified stigma b. Modified corolla c. Modified calyx d. Modified perianth 2. Which of the following species has an epappose fruit? a. Centaurea calcitrapa b. Cirsium vulgare c. Onopordum acaulon d. Cynara cardunculus 3. Which of the following genera has a pappus comprised of plumose bristles? a. Centaurea b. Carduus c. Silybum d. Cirsium 4. Which of the following species has the largest fruits? a. Cirsium arvense b. Cirsium japonicum c. Cirsium undulatum d. Cirsium vulgare 5. Which of the following species has a pappus that hides the style base? a. Volutaria muricata b. Mantisalca salmantica c. Centaurea solstitialis d. Crupina vulgaris 6. Which of the following species is classified as a noxious weed seed somewhere in the United States? a.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturments.Com Naturments 3409 W Oakland Park Blvd, Lauderdale Lakes, Florida 33311
    United States of America FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Southwest Region Dama J. Brown, Regional Director Federal Trade Commission – Southwest Region 1999 Bryan Street, Suite 2150 Dallas, Texas 75201 May 1, 2020 WARNING LETTER Via U.S. Mail and email: [email protected] Naturments 3409 W Oakland Park Blvd, Lauderdale Lakes, Florida 33311 Re: Unsubstantiated Claims for Coronavirus Prevention and Treatment To Whom It May Concern: This is to advise you that FTC staff has reviewed your website at https://www.naturments.com on April 29, 2020. We have determined that you are unlawfully advertising that certain products prevent or treat Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Some examples of Coronavirus prevention or treatment claims on your website include the following representations made concerning Black Seed Oil: On a webpage titled “Fight Coronavirus with Black Seed Oil: Boost Your Immunity,” under the heading “Research to Combat Coronavirus That Used Nigella Sativa Extracts,” you claim: “In an attempt to prevent COVID-19 duplication and possibly kill it, a study was made where it was found that extracts of Anthemis hyalina (Ah), Nigella sativa (Ns) and peels of Citrus sinensis (Cs) which were earlier used as a traditional medicine to combat antimicrobial diseases could decrease the virus load when any of them were added to the coronavirus infected cells. In the study, they tested the extracts based on their effectiveness on the imitation of coronavirus and the expression of TRP genes during coronavirus infection.” On the same webpage, under the heading “The black seed oil contains antiviral and antibacterial effects,” you claim: “Nigella sativa contains many essential components one of which is thymoquinone, an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compound.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed: Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea Solstitialis L.)
    Weed: Yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.) Family: Asteraceae (Sunflower family) Images: Brief Plant Description: (Summarized from Healy, E. and J. DiTomaso, Yellow Starthistle Fact Sheet, http://wric.ucdavis.edu/yst/biology/yst_fact_sheet.html) The seed leaves (cotyledons) are oblong to spatulate, 6-9 mm long and 3-5 mm wide, base wedge- shaped, tip +/- squared and glabrous. First few rosette leaves typically oblanceolate. Subsequent rosette leaves oblanceolate, entire to pinnate-lobed. Terminal lobes largest. Later rosette leaves to 15 cm long and are typically deeply lobed +/- to midrib and appear ruffled. Surfaces +/- densely covered with fine cottony hairs. Lobes mostly acute, with toothed to wavy margins. Terminal lobes +/- triangular to lanceolate. Mature plants have stiff stems, openly branched from near or above the base or sometimes not branched in very small plants. Stem leaves alternate, mostly linear or +/- narrowly oblong to oblanceolate. Margins smooth, toothed, or wavy. Leaf bases extend down the stems (decurrent) and give stems a winged appearance. Rosette leaves typically withered by flowering time. Largest stem wings typically to ~ 3 mm wide. Lower stem leaves sometimes +/- deeply pinnate-lobed. Foliage grayish- to bluish-green, densely covered with fine white cottony hairs that +/- hide thick stiff hairs and glands. Flower heads ovoid, spiny, solitary on stem tips, consist of numerous yellow disk flowers. Phyllaries palmately spined, with one long central spine and 2 or more pairs of short lateral spines. Insect- pollinated. Flowers mid-summer to fall. Corollas mostly 13-20 mm long. Involucre (phyllaries as a unit) ~ 12-18 mm long. Phyllaries +/- dense to sparsely covered with cottony hairs or with patches at the spine bases.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Controls Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea Solstitialis) in California Grasslands
    California Exotic Pest Plant Council 1996 Symposium Proceedings Fire Controls Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) in California Grasslands. Burns timed to prevent seed maturation have nearly eliminated this exotic, and increased natives within test plots at Sugarloaf Ridge State Park, CA Marla S. Hastings and Joseph M. DiTomaso [Editor's note: the following article, Hastings, Marla. "Fire Controls Yellow Starthistle." RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT NOTES, Volume 14, number 2 (Winter, 1996), is reprinted by permission of The University of Wisconsin Press. It summarizes the talk given at the 1996 CalEPPC Symposium in San Diego. Adapted according to Guidelines for Preparation of Manuscripts for Publication in the Proceedings of the California Exotic Pest Plant Council 1996.) Marla S. Hastings California State Parks, Silverado District 20 E. Spain Street, Sonoma, CA 95476 Joseph M. DiTomaso Coop Ext. Non-Crop Weed Ecologist Vegetable Crops/Weed Science Program, Robbins Hall University of California, Davis, CA 95616 Yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) first invaded open grassland sites within the San Francisco Bay Area sometime before 1869 when a specimen was collected in Oakland. Native to Eurasia, it was apparently introduced in association with livestock use during the Mexican and post-mission period (Maddox and Mayfield 1985). A fast-growing, aggressive annual herb, yellow starthistle reaches a height of 0.3 to 2 meters, and often grows in dense stands, mainly in grasslands. It rapidly crowds out less-aggressive natives. At present it is the most widely distributed weed in California, infesting over 4 million hectares, or approximately 10 percent of the total surface area of the state. In addition, it has infested large areas in Washington, Oregon and Idaho, and is present in smaller numbers scattered throughout much of the United States and Canada (Maddox 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Set in a Non-Native, Self-Compatible Thistle on Santa Cruz Island: Implications for the Invasion of an Island Ecosystem
    SEED SET IN A NON-NATIVE, SELF-COMPATIBLE THISTLE ON SANTA CRUZ ISLAND: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INVASION OF AN ISLAND ECOSYSTEM JOHN F. BARTHELL1, ROBBIN W. THORP2, ADRIAN M. WENNER3, JOHN M. RANDALL4 AND DEBORAH S. MITCHELL5 1Department of Biology & Joe C. Jackson College of Graduate Studies & Research, University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond, OK 73034; [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 3Department of Ecology, Evolution & Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 4The Nature Conservancy, Invasive Species Program Initiative & Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 5Animal Medical Center, Edmond, OK 73034 Abstract—In two previous studies we demonstrated a positive association between honey bee visitation and seed set or seed head weight in the invasive yellow star-thistle, Centaurea solstitialis. However, as reported here, we were unable to find similar evidence for the congeneric tocalote, Centaurea melitensis. Both seed head weights and percent seed set levels obtained from two plots showed no significant differences among four treatments. Indeed, no significant differences occurred between controls (open) and bagged flower heads that excluded honey bees (but allowed native bee visitation). There were also no differences between controls and complete exclusion of bee-pollinators, confirming self-compatibility reported for this species elsewhere. Unlike C. solstitialis, C. melitensis attracts relatively low numbers of honey bees. In addition, C. melitensis is generally more widespread on the Channel Islands than C. solstitialis. We discuss these patterns with reference to the invasiveness of both species on Santa Cruz Island. Keywords: Apis mellifera, Centaurea solstitialis, honey bee, invasive species, pollination, yellow star- thistle INTRODUCTION environments is subject to controversy, increasingly so during the last decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Journal APRIL 2019 Newsletter of the North Dakota State Seed Department
    The North Dakota Seed Journal APRIL 2019 Newsletter of the North Dakota State Seed Department Preparing for Field Inspection Inside Joe Magnusson, Field Seed Program Manager Plant eligible seed on eligible ground 1 Preparing for Field Inspection Seed cannot be planted on fields that had the same crop the previous year unless 2 From the Commisioner’s it was the same variety and that field was inspected for certification. Durum has an Desk additional restriction, which prohibits planting Foundation class seed on fields that 3 Summer Field Days had spring wheat the previous two years. If you plant Registered durum seed, one year out of spring wheat is all that is required. Even so, we recommend avoiding 3 Seed industry plays important spring wheat ground for several years as we have seen wheat carryover and role in controlling Palmer volunteer in some fields for up to five years. Though it is not recommended, you can amaranth plant crops on land which we consider inseparable (small grain crops on previous 4 The Importance of small grain residue) the following year with the exception of durum on wheat as Completing Forms stated above. If this is your only planting option, monitor the field for volunteer crops 4 Germination and TZ testing before the inspector arrives and if you notice patches of other crop plants, you can cancel the field prior to inspection. Some crop admixtures (wheat, barley and oats) 5 Potato Virus Y and North if carefully conditioned, can be removed from the seed lot and may pass the final Dakota certification process.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeology of Walls in the Walking Dead
    Undead Divides: An Archaeology of Walls in The Walking Dead Howard Williams In 2010, the zombie horror genre gained even greater popularity than the huge following it had previously enjoyed when AMC’s The Walking Dead (TWD) first aired. The chapter surveys the archaeology of this fictional post-apocalyptic material world in the show’s seasons 1–9, focusing on its mural practices and environments which draw upon ancient, biblical, medieval and colonial motifs. The study identifies the moralities and socialities of wall-building, dividing not only survivors aspiring to re-found civilization from the wilderness and manifesting the distinctive identities of each mural community, but also distinguishing the living from the undead. The roles of the dead and the undead in mural iterations are also explored. As such, dimensions of past and present wall-building practices are reflected and inverted in this fictional world. As part of a broader ‘archaeology of The Walking Dead’, the chapter identifies the potentials of exploring the show’s physical barriers within the context of the public archaeology of frontiers and borderlands. Andrea: What’s your secret? The Governor: Really big walls. Andrea: That soldier had walls too and we all know how that turned out, so. The Governor: I guess we do. The real secret is what goes on within these walls. It’s about getting back to who we were, who we really are, not just waiting to be saved. You know people here have homes, medical care, kids go to school. Adults have jobs to do. It’s a sense of purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Talking About Dying: How to Begin Honest Conversations About What Lies Ahead October 2018
    Talking about dying: How to begin honest conversations about what lies ahead October 2018 0QR_0092_OFH_EoL_report.indd 1 26/09/2018 13:29 Talking about dying October 2018 Our Future Health In its 500th year, the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) is taking the opportunity to reflect on day- to-day dilemmas facing physicians and patients within the current healthcare system. Our Future Health is a year-long campaign of events and multimedia outputs that will lead the debate and raise awareness of the impact of these challenges on patients, healthcare professionals and the NHS. This campaign has focused on three main areas: clinical resources, innovation and research, and investment. The data captured are informing policy positions and documents that will drive improvement in health and healthcare through advocacy, education and research. Authors Join in the discussion Dr Sarah-Jane Bailey National medical director’s clinical fellow 2017/18 #OurFutureHealth @RCPFuture ST6 in geriatrics and general internal medicine Kacey Cogle Policy projects and engagement manager Royal College of Physicians Case studies kindly provided by: Tess Makinson, end of life care facilitator, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust Helen Meehan, lead nurse – palliative care and end of life Rachel Davis, senior clinical nurse specialist – palliative care, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust Victoria McLoughlin, palliative and end of life care practice development lead Marie Roberts and Anne Mitchell, lead clinical facilitators for supportive palliative care for care homes, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust Dr Karen Forbes, professorial teaching fellow and consultant in palliative medicine, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust Acknowledgements This report could not have been developed without the support of: Professor Dame Jane Dacre Professor Bee Wee Professor David Oliver Professor Andrew Goddard RCP Joint Specialist Committee for Palliative Care Professor Derek Willis Professor Rob George.
    [Show full text]
  • Team Standings
    TEAM STANDINGS Team standings for: 07-12-16 Yost Team Name Division rank Score !Fun Must Be Always! Yost 1 100 Team McEwen Yost 2 97.71875 Sufferin' Succotash, Mach II Yost 3 85.8515625 mom's on the move Yost 4 85.1451612903225 sMouthies Yost 5 82.9375 Sefcal Yost 6 82.5 Beat Those Buckeyes! Yost 7 71.3125 CLAIRE UNDERWOOD IS OUR SPIRIT ANIMAL Yost 8 60.3625 A&B Yost 9 7.28125 Woodson Team Name Division rank Score Donut Attitude Woodson 1 100 PMMS Attack Woodson 1 100 Ironladiez Woodson 1 100 International Powerhouse Woodson 2 99.1125 Re-boot Camp Woodson 3 94.3611111111111 IntrEpid Woodson 4 94.171875 Milk Room Movers and Shakers Woodson 5 92.40625 UMOR Moves More Woodson 6 87.9479166666666 Bo Knows Transplant Woodson 7 76.516129032258 Energetic Devoted Resourceful Evolved Go-Getters Woodson 8 76.2278481012658 get MOTTivated.ORg Woodson 9 64.4368421052631 Woodson Team Name Division rank Score CTO McSlims Woodson 10 64.3125 U of M Radiology Woodson 11 54.7421875 Materiel Services Faith Walkers Woodson 12 54.6875 Wolverines Division Team Name Division rank Score The Banana Boys Wolverines Division 1 100 Let's do all the running! Wolverines Division 1 100 The M Team Wolverines Division 1 100 VJPB Wolverines Division 2 99.875 Angell Walkers Wolverines Division 3 99.5769230769231 Healthy for U Wolverines Division 4 99.2291666666666 Agony of DeFeet Wolverines Division 5 97.974358974359 Wolverines Division Team Name Division rank Score Balance, Movement, Energy Wolverines Division 6 97.9166666666666 Citrusmilo Canyon Crunchers Wolverines Division
    [Show full text]
  • Feminized Seeds and the Ethics of Cannabis Farming
    Feminized Seed and the Ethics of Cannabis Farming © 2017 Oregon CBD A Jack Hempicine LLC Company Feminized Seeds and the Ethics of Cannabis Farming Question: You advertise “feminized seed”. How is this different from “regular” (male / female) seed? What are the advantages of all female seed? Will I get hermaphrodites with your product? Answer: In 2017 (and beyond), we only offer seed that will produce female plants. This is made possible by using a chemical reversal process on a targeted female plant to produce viable pollen, which is then used to pollinate other female plants in a controlled environment1. Because there are only female sex chromosomes to contribute in these pairings, all resulting progeny are female. There is no increased risk of hermaphrodites when using properly bred feminized seed compared with regular seed or growing from clone. We do this to maximize per acre yields, minimize labor costs, and, critically, to reduce the risk of cross-pollinating neighbors. This brief white paper provides data- driven conclusions on cross-pollination concerns, describes the financial benefits of feminized seed for farmers, and explores our process of producing feminized seed. I. Cannabis Cross Pollination The possibility of cross-pollinating another farmer’s crop provides the most critical reason for exclusively using feminized seed. Cross-pollination (or simply pollination) is one of the most economically damaging events that can occur in cannabis farming if the goal is to produce seedless flowers or pure seed for planting. Oregon had its first major taste of this phenomenon in the 2016 production season, costing recreational growers, medical growers, and other hemp farmers (including us) in the Willamette valley millions of dollars in lost revenue.
    [Show full text]