Findings of a World Compilation of Time Use Surveys
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Externalisation of Borders
EXTERNALISATION OF BORDERS February 25th and 26th, 2020 LAGOS (Nigeria) The phenomenon of re-trafficking of women repatriated in Nigeria by Kokunre A. Eghafona* Introduction Trafficking in Persons (TIP) or Human trafficking (HT) is regarded as a modern form of slavery (UN, 2001). Human trafficking is one of the most egregious human rights violations (Annan, 2001) and violations of human rights are seen to be the cause and consequence of trafficking in persons (UN, 2014). Since 2000, soon after a global treaty to combat HT was adopted, the term modern slavery is now the catch-all term to describe human trafficking, forced labour, debt bondage, sex trafficking, forced marriage and other slave-like exploitation. Human traffickers are said to be motivated by greed, driven by quota, devoid of respect for human rights, preying upon the vulnerable, and damaging the psychological and physical well-being of their victims (Toney-Butler & Mittel, 2019:1). Human Trafficking (HT), especially in women and girls, is the most visible of the categories of modern slavery in Nigeria because of its international dimension. Nigeria has remained a source, transit and destination country for women and children in human trafficking for forced labour and sex trafficking (Okojie et al, 2003; Maicibi 2008; US TIP Report 2019). Although women, men and children may all be trafficked for various purposes, trafficking is often a ‘gendered’ crime. Available evidence suggests that those who are trafficked into the sex industry and as domestic servants are more likely to be women and children (USDOS: 2011; WHO 2012). According to Annan (2001), HT thrives on discrimination against women, especially the increasing “feminization of poverty” and it is driven by organised gangs of traffickers, who ruthlessly exploit their victims for the easy profit they hope to gain. -
Women in the Middle East and North Africa: Issues for Congress
Women in the Middle East and North Africa: Issues for Congress June 19, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46423 SUMMARY R46423 Women in the Middle East and North Africa: June 19, 2020 Issues for Congress Zoe Danon The status of women in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) has garnered Section Research Manager widespread interest among many Members of Congress. Many experts have found that women in this region fare worse than those in other parts of the world on a range of Sarah R. Collins social, economic, legal and political measures. Some attribute this underperformance to Research Assistant gender roles and perspectives (including discriminatory laws and beliefs), and challenges facing the region overall (such as a preponderance of undemocratic governments, poor economic growth, civil wars, and mass displacement, which often disproportionately affect women). Some key issues facing many women in the region include the following: Unequal Legal Rights. Women in the MENA region face greater legal discrimination than women in any other region, with differential laws on issues such as marriage and divorce, freedom of movement, and inheritance, as well as limited to no legal protection from domestic violence. Constraints on Economic Participation and Opportunity. Regional conditions, in addition to gender-based discrimination, contribute to a significant difference between men and women’s participation in MENA economies. For example, women do not participate in the labor force to the same degree as women in other regions, and those who do participate face on average nearly twice the levels of unemployment than men. Underrepresentation in Political Processes. -
Female Genital Cutting
DHS Comparative Reports 7 Female Genital Cutting in the Demographic and Health Surveys: A Critical and Comparative Analysis MEASURE DHS+ assists countries worldwide in the collection and use of data to monitor and evaluate population, health, and nutrition programs. Funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), MEASURE DHS+ is implemented by ORC Macro in Calverton, Maryland. The main objectives of the MEASURE DHS+ project are: 1) to provide decisionmakers in survey countries with information useful for informed policy choices, 2) to expand the international population and health database, 3) to advance survey methodology, and 4) to develop in participating countries the skills and resources necessary to conduct high-quality demographic and health surveys. Information about the MEASURE DHS+ project or the status of MEASURE DHS+ surveys is available on the Internet at http://www.measuredhs.com or by contacting: ORC Macro 11785 Beltsville Drive, Suite 300 Calverton, MD 20705 USA Telephone: 301-572-0200 Fax: 301-572-0999 E-mail: [email protected] DHS Comparative Reports No. 7 Female Genital Cutting in the Demographic and Health Surveys: A Critical and Comparative Analysis P. Stanley Yoder Noureddine Abderrahim Arlinda Zhuzhuni ORC Macro Calverton, Maryland, USA September 2004 This publication was made possible through support provided by the U.S. Agency for International Development under the terms of Contract No. HRN-C-00-97-00019- 00. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development. Editor: Sidney Moore Series design: Katherine Senzee Document production: Justine Faulkenburg Recommended citation: Yoder, P. -
The Integration of Women's Rights Into the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership
R6177 EMHRN Women's Report 14/05/2003 1:55 PM Page i The Integration of Women’s Rights into the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership Women’s Rights in Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestine, Syria and Tunisia by Rabéa Naciri and Isis Nusair Published by the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network R6177 EMHRN Women's Report 14/05/2003 1:55 PM Page ii Copenhagen, May 2003 Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network Wilders Plads 8H 1403 Copenhagen K Denmark Tel: + 45 32 69 89 10 Fax: +45 32 69 89 01 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.euromedrights.net © copyright 2003 Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network Bibliographic information Title: Integrating Women’s Rights in the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership Personal Authors: Naciri, Rábea; Nusair, Isis Editors: Han, Sarah and Jorgensen, Marit Floe Corporate Author: Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network Publisher: Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network Date of Publication: 20030500 Pages: 76 ISBN: 87-91224-03-9 Original Language: French – L’intégration des droits des femmes dans le Partenariat euro- mediterranéen. Translation into English: Sharpe, Susan Translation into Arabic: Al-Haddad, Aiman H. Index terms: Women / Gender discrimination / Discrimination / Equality before the law / Violence against women /Family / Marriage/ Freedom of association / Freedom of movement / Political Participation / European Union Geographical terms: Mediterranean countries / North Africa / Middle East The report is published with the financial support of the EU Commission and the Heinrich Böll Foundation. The opinions expressed by the authors does not represent the official point of view neither of the EU Commission nor the Heinrich Böll Foundation. Cover design: Leila Drar Layout design: Genprint and 80:20 - Educating and Acting for a Better World, Ireland. -
1 Institutional Changes in the Maghreb: Toward a Modern Gender
Institutional Changes in the Maghreb: Toward a Modern Gender Regime? Valentine M. Moghadam Professor of Sociology and International Affairs Northeastern University [email protected] DRAFT – December 2016 Abstract The countries of the Maghreb – Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia – are part of the Middle East and North Africa region, which is widely assumed to be resistant to women’s equality and empowerment. And yet, the region has experienced significant changes in women’s legal status, political participation, and social positions, along with continued contention over Muslim family law and women’s equal citizenship. Do the institutional and normative changes signal a shift in the “gender regime” from patriarchal to modern? To what extent have women’s rights organizations contributed to such changes? While mapping the changes that have occurred, and offering some comparisons to Egypt, another North African country that has seen fewer legal and normative changes in the direction of women’s equality, the paper identifies the persistent constraints that prevent both the empowerment of all women and broader socio-political transformation. The paper draws on the author’s research in and on the region since the early 1990s, analysis of patterns and trends since the Arab Spring of 2011, and the relevant secondary sources. Introduction The Middle East and North Africa region (MENA) is widely assumed to be resistant to women’s equality and empowerment. Many scholars have identified conservative social norms, patriarchal cultural practices, and the dominance of Islam as barriers to women’s empowerment and gender equality (Alexander and Welzel 2011; Ciftci 2010; Donno and Russett 2004; Fish 2002; Inglehart and Norris 2003; Rizzo et al 2007). -
Initiatives in Justice Reform 1992-2012
Initiatives in Justice Reform 1992-2012 Public Disclosure Authorized Initiatives in Justice Reform 1992-2012 THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20043 USA Telephone: 202 477-1234 Facsimile: 202 477-6391 Internet: www.worldbank.org/lji E-mail: [email protected] Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized © 2012 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / International Development Association or The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org Disclaimer The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views ofThe World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to the work is given. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, Internet: www.copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, Email: [email protected]. -
Gains and Gaps: Perceptions and Experiences of Gender In
Gains and gaps Perceptions and experiences of gender in Africa By Carmen Alpin Lardies, Dominique Dryding, and Carolyn Logan Afrobarometer Policy Paper No. 61 | November 2019 Introduction Gender equality is a focal point as well as a cross-cutting principle of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nations, 2019). Designated as Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) No. 5 in its own right, it is targeted in many of the other SDGs as well, underlining the agenda’s clear statement that development can only succeed if its benefits are enjoyed equally by women and men. The agenda calls for equality in women’s access to education and health care, in ownership and control over resources, and in women’s engagement with new information and communications technologies (ICTs). Advocates can trace both the distance traveled and the long road ahead to achieve gender-equality commitments under the SDGs in Africa. Women’s education and work opportunities, decision-making power in the household, and Internet access have all increased, but gains are often modest and inconsistent across countries, and do not always succeed in closing gender gaps. With regard to labour-force participation, for example, African women’s gains between 1990 and 2018 reduced the gender gap by 6 percentage points – but still left an 18-point disadvantage compared to men (ILOSTAT, 2019). A World Bank (2019) review of “a decade of reform” of legal rights affecting women’s prospects as entrepreneurs and employees cited sub-Saharan Africa as one of the most improved regions, but still found that its countries give women fewer than half the legal rights they afford men. -
Women's Rights in the Middle East and North Africa
HARD-WON PROGRESS AND A LONG ROAD AHEAD: WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA by Sanja Kelly As the governments of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) under- take the diffi cult process of enacting social and political change, the unequal status of women presents a particularly formidable challenge. In Iraq, deliberations over women’s legal status have been as contentious as negotiations over how to structure the government. In Jordan, measures to increase penalties for so-called honor crimes faced strong resistance by ultraconservative parliamentarians and ordinary citizens who believe that tradition and religion afford them the right to severely punish and even murder female relatives for behavior they deem immoral. These debates are not just legal and philosophical struggles among elites. They are emo- tionally charged political battles that touch upon fundamental notions of morality and social order. In order to provide a detailed look at the conditions faced by women in the Middle East and understand the complex environment surrounding efforts to improve their status, Freedom House conducted a comprehen- sive study of women’s rights in the region. The fi rst edition of this project was published in 2005. The present edition offers an updated examination of the issue, with a special focus on changes that have occurred over the last fi ve years. Although the study indicates that a substantial defi cit in women’s rights persists in every country in the MENA region, the fi ndings also include notable progress, particularly in terms of economic opportu- nities, educational attainment, and political participation. -
THE EXPLOITATION of ADOLESCENT GIRLS and YOUNG WOMEN in MODERN SLAVERY: EVIDENCE for ACTION Introduction
THE EXPLOITATION OF ADOLESCENT GIRLS AND YOUNG WOMEN IN MODERN SLAVERY: EVIDENCE FOR ACTION Introduction The Call to Action to End Forced Labour, Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking, SDG 8.7 launched at the 72nd meeting of the Take immediate and effective UN General Assembly, urges countries measures to eradicate forced labour, to publish national strategies to end modern slavery and human end modern slavery and calls for trafficking and secure the prohibition international cooperation “to reduce the and elimination of the worst forms of drivers of forced labour … and to protect child labour, including recruitment and the most vulnerable”. use of child solders, and by 2025 end child labour in all its forms. Of the 40-45 million people affected by forced labour and forced marriage globally, 71 per cent are women and girls1. In 2016, This briefing offers a wider overview of these an estimated four million adults and one three countries, followed by an early look million children were sexually exploited at the available IOM data from each, and for commercial gain; of these, 99 per some first findings. It highlights poverty, cent were identified as female2. Age- and discrimination, gender-based violence and gender-sensitive responses are needed family pressures as drivers that push women to address the disproportionate impact of and girls to seek opportunities away from modern slavery on adolescent girls and home. It emphasises challenges for women young women, but the evidence base in and girls, who frequently lack autonomy this area remains limited. to decide on the type of work they will undertake, their destination, contract In September 2017 Plan International UK or mode of travel, and therefore rely on commissioned new research aimed at recruiters and employers, leaving them improving understanding of the exploitation vulnerable to exploitation. -
Gender, Development, and Marriage
Gender, Development, and Marriage by Caroh'ne Sweetman i Oxfam Focus on Gender The books in Oxf am's Focus on Gender series were originally published as single issues of the journal Gender and Development, which is published by Oxfam three times a year. It is the only European journal to focus specifically on gender and development issues internationally, to explore the links between gender and development initiatives, and to make the links between theoretical and practical work in this field. For information about subscription rates, please apply to Taylor and Francis Ltd., Customer Services Department, Rankine Road, Basingstoke, Hants RG24 8PR UK; Fax: + 44 (0) 1256 330245. In North America, please apply to Taylor and Francis Inc., Customer Services Department, 325 Chestnut Street, 8th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA; Fax +1 800 821 8312. In Australia, please apply to Carfax Publishing Company, P.O. Box 352, Cammeray, NSW 2062, Australia; Fax: +61 (0) 2 9958 2376 [email protected] www.tandf.co.uk /journals All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of the Publisher. The views expressed in this book are those of the individual contributors, and not necessarily those of the Editor or the Publisher. Front cover: Berta, a science teacher in Angola, with her husband Sebastiao, a head teacher, and their new-born child Photo: Crispin Hughes/Panos © Oxfam GB 2003 Published by Oxfam GB, 274 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7DZ, UK www.oxfam.org.uk / publications Typeset in Palatino by Oxfam; printed by Information Press, Eynsham Oxfam is a registered charity No. -
Women's Economic Empowerment in Selected MENA Countries
Women’s Economic Empowerment in Selected MENA Countries THE IMPACT OF LEGAL FRAMEWORKS IN ALGERIA, EGYPT, JORDAN, LIBYA, MOROCCO AND TUNISIA KEY FINDINGS GLOBAL RELATIONS Middle East and Africa THE OECD AND THE MENA REGION: partnering to advance women’s economic empowerment Achieving women’s equality is a global challenge that no country in the world has yet met. Yet the stakes are high: it is estimated that raising women’s labour force participation rates to that of men could add USD 12 trillion, or 26% to global GDP by 2025. And when women are active economic participants, societies and families benefit. To tackle this daunting challenge, the OECD has made women’s economic and social empowerment a core priority of its work. In 2010, the Organisation launched the OECD Gender Initiative, which has led to the creation of numerous standards and guidance to help members and partners enact policy reforms to close the gender gap in their countries. We have also worked closely with international instances such as the G20 and the G7 to help define targets for reducing gender gaps in labour force participation and creating a more gender-responsive economic environment. The OECD is actively working with the UN to support the achievement of the SDGs on gender, recently launching – in partnership with the ILO and UN Women – the Equal Pay International Coalition (EPIC) to achieve equal pay for men and women by 2030. The MENA region has also demonstrated its growing commitment to building more inclusive societies. The six countries covered in this report have all reformed their constitutions to enshrine the principle of gender equality and adhered to international conventions that safeguard women’s rights. -
Gender, Time Use, and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa
WORLD BANK WORKING PAPER NO. 73 Gender, Time Use, and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa Edited by C. Mark Blackden and Quentin Wodon THE WORLD BANK WORLD BANK WORKING PAPER NO. 73 Gender, Time Use, and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa Edited by C. Mark Blackden and Quentin Wodon THE WORLD BANK Washington, D.C. Copyright © 2006 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First Printing: December 2005 printed on recycled paper 1 2 3 4 5 07 06 05 World Bank Working Papers are published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development community with the least possible delay. The manuscript of this paper therefore has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formally-edited texts. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank of the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.