DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 37/Tuesday, February 25, 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 37/Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10730 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 2020 / Notices Silk, NRC Disability Program Specialist, or petitions for leave to intervene must • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and at 301–287–0745, by videophone at be filed by April 27, 2020. purchase copies of public documents at 240–428–3217, or by email at ADDRESSES: You may submit comments the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One [email protected]. Determinations on by any of the following methods (unless White Flint North, 11555 Rockville requests for reasonable accommodation this document describes a different Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. will be made on a case-by-case basis. method for submitting comments on a B. Submitting Comments Members of the public may request to specific subject): receive this information electronically. • Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to Please include Docket ID NRC–2020– If you would like to be added to the https://www.regulations.gov and search 0053, facility name, unit number(s), distribution, please contact the Nuclear for Docket ID NRC–2020–0053. Address docket number(s), application date, and Regulatory Commission, Office of the questions about NRC Docket IDs in subject in your comment submission. Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301– Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges; The NRC cautions you not to include 415–1969), or by email at telephone: 301–287–9127; email: identifying or contact information that [email protected] or Tyesha.Bush@ [email protected]. For technical you do not want to be publicly nrc.gov. questions, contact the individual listed disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC is holding the meetings in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION The NRC will post all comment under the authority of the Government CONTACT section of this document. submissions at https:// in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b. • Mail comments to: Office of www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into ADAMS. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7– A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory The NRC does not routinely edit of February 2020. comment submissions to remove For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001, ATTN: Program Management, identifying or contact information. Rochelle C. Bavol, Announcements and Editing Staff. If you are requesting or aggregating Executive Assistant, Office of the Secretary. For additional direction on obtaining comments from other persons for [FR Doc. 2020–03877 Filed 2–21–20; 4:15 pm] information and submitting comments, submission to the NRC, then you should BILLING CODE 7590–01–P see ‘‘Obtaining Information and inform those persons not to include Submitting Comments’’ in the identifying or contact information that SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of they do not want to be publicly NUCLEAR REGULATORY this document. disclosed in their comment submission. COMMISSION FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Your request should state that the NRC Shirley Rohrer, Office of Nuclear does not routinely edit comment [NRC–2020–0053] Reactor Regulation, 301–415–5411, submissions to remove such information before making the comment Biweekly Notice; Applications and email: [email protected], U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, submissions available to the public or Amendments to Facility Operating entering the comment into ADAMS. Licenses and Combined Licenses Washington DC 20555–0001. Involving No Significant Hazards SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: II. Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating Considerations I. Obtaining Information and Licenses and Combined Licenses and Submitting Comments AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Proposed No Significant Hazards Commission. A. Obtaining Information Consideration Determination ACTION: Biweekly notice. Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2020– For the facility-specific amendment 0053, facility name, unit number(s), requests shown below, the Commission SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 189.a.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as docket number(s), application date, and finds that the licensee’s analyses amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear subject when contacting the NRC about provided, consistent with title 10 of the Regulatory Commission (NRC) is the availability of information for this Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) publishing this regular biweekly notice. action. You may obtain publicly- Section 50.91 is sufficient to support the The Act requires the Commission to available information related to this proposed determination that these publish notice of any amendments action by any of the following methods: amendment requests involve NSHC. • Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to issued, or proposed to be issued, and Under the Commission’s regulations in https://www.regulations.gov and search grants the Commission the authority to 10 CFR 50.92, operation of the facility for Docket ID NRC–2020–0053. issue and make immediately effective in accordance with the proposed • NRC’s Agencywide Documents amendment would not (1) involve a any amendment to an operating license Access and Management System or combined license, as applicable, significant increase in the probability or (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly- consequences of an accident previously upon a determination by the available documents online in the Commission that such amendment evaluated, or (2) create the possibility of ADAMS Public Documents collection at a new or different kind of accident from involves no significant hazards https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ consideration, notwithstanding the any accident previously evaluated; or adams.html. To begin the search, select (3) involve a significant reduction in a pendency before the Commission of a ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For request for a hearing from any person. margin of safety. problems with ADAMS, please contact The Commission is seeking public This biweekly notice includes all the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) comments on this proposed amendments issued, or proposed to be reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301– determination. Any comments received issued, from January 28, 2020, to 415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@ within 30 days after the date of February 10, 2020. The last biweekly nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number publication of this notice will be notice was published on February 11, for each document referenced (if it is considered in making any final 2020. available in ADAMS) is provided the determination. DATES: Comments must be filed by first time that it is mentioned in this Normally, the Commission will not March 26, 2020. A request for a hearing document. issue the amendment until the VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:34 Feb 24, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM 25FEN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 2020 / Notices 10731 expiration of 60 days after the date of In accordance with 10 CFR 2.309(f), notwithstanding the request for a publication of this notice. The the petition must also set forth the hearing. Any hearing would take place Commission may issue the license specific contentions which the after issuance of the amendment. If the amendment before expiration of the 60- petitioner seeks to have litigated in the final determination is that the day period provided that its final proceeding. Each contention must amendment request involves a determination is that the amendment consist of a specific statement of the significant hazards consideration, then involves NSHC. In addition, the issue of law or fact to be raised or any hearing held would take place Commission may issue the amendment controverted. In addition, the petitioner before the issuance of the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-day must provide a brief explanation of the unless the Commission finds an comment period if circumstances bases for the contention and a concise imminent danger to the health or safety change during the 30-day comment statement of the alleged facts or expert of the public, in which case it will issue period such that failure to act in a opinion which support the contention an appropriate order or rule under 10 timely way would result, for example in and on which the petitioner intends to CFR part 2. derating or shutdown of the facility. If rely in proving the contention at the A State, local governmental body, the Commission takes action prior to the hearing. The petitioner must also Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, or expiration of either the comment period provide references to the specific agency thereof, may submit a petition to or the notice period, it will publish in sources and documents on which the the Commission to participate as a party the Federal Register a notice of petitioner intends to rely to support its under 10 CFR 2.309(h)(1). The petition issuance. If the Commission makes a position on the issue. The petition must should state the nature and extent of the final NSHC determination, any hearing include sufficient information to show petitioner’s interest in the proceeding. will take place after issuance. The that a genuine dispute exists with the The petition should be submitted to the Commission expects that the need to applicant or licensee on a material issue Commission no later than 60 days from take action on an amendment before 60 of law or fact. Contentions must be the date of publication of this notice. days have elapsed will occur very limited to matters within the scope of The petition must be filed in accordance infrequently. the proceeding. The contention must be with the filing instructions in the one which, if proven, would entitle the ‘‘Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)’’ A. Opportunity To Request a Hearing petitioner to relief. A petitioner who section of this document, and should and Petition for Leave To Intervene fails to satisfy the requirements at 10 meet the requirements for petitions set Within 60 days after the date of CFR 2.309(f) with respect to at least one forth in this section, except that under publication of this notice, any persons contention will not be permitted to 10 CFR 2.309(h)(2) a State, local (petitioner) whose interest may be participate as a party.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States https://marketpublishers.com/r/AC4983D1366EN.html Date: June 2012 Pages: 700 Price: US$ 450.00 (Single User License) ID: AC4983D1366EN Abstracts The global energy industry has explored many options to meet the growing energy needs of industrialized economies wherein production demands are to be met with supply of power from varied energy resources worldwide. There has been a clearer realization of the finite nature of oil resources and the ever higher pushing demand for energy. The world has yet to stabilize on the complex geopolitical undercurrents which influence the oil and gas production as well as supply strategies globally. Aruvian's R'search’s report – Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States - analyzes the scope of American energy production from varied traditional sources as well as the developing renewable energy sources. In view of understanding energy transactions, the report also studies the revenue returns for investors in various energy channels which manifest themselves in American energy demand and supply dynamics. In depth view has been provided in this report of US oil, electricity, natural gas, nuclear power, coal, wind, and hydroelectric sectors. The various geopolitical interests and intentions governing the exploitation, production, trade and supply of these resources for energy production has also been analyzed by this report in a non-partisan manner. The report starts with a descriptive base analysis of the characteristics of the global energy industry in terms of economic quantity of demand. The drivers of demand and the traditional resources which are used to fulfill this demand are explained along with the emerging mandate of nuclear energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Byron, Units 1 & 2, Dresden, Units 2 & 3, James A. Fitzpatrick, Lasalle
    200 Exelon Way Exelon Generation ® Kennett Square. PA 19348 www.exeloncorp.com 10 CFR 50.55a RS-19-089 JAFP-19-0084 August 27, 2019 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-37 and NPF-66 NRC Docket Nos. STN 50-454 and STN 50-455 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos. 50-237 and 50-249 James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-59 NRC Docket No. 50-333 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-11 and NPF-18 N RC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-37 4 Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85 N RC Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-29 and DPR-30 NRC Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265 Subject: Request to Use a Provision of a Later Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI Reference: NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-12, "Clarification on Use of Later Editions and Addenda to the ASME OM Code and Section XI," dated July 28, 2004 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Request to Use a Provision of a Later Addenda of the ASME B&PV Code, Section XI August 27, 2019 Page 2 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a, "Codes and standards," paragraph (g)(4)(iv), and the guidance provided in the referenced document, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) requests NRC approval to use a specific provision of a later edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV) Code, Section XI, for the units identified above.
    [Show full text]
  • Nrc Liaison Report
    SC-2Mtg07-2_Att#10 NRC LIAISON REPORT • STP first company to step forward in decades seeking new reactor license The application, a 200,000-page document submitted on a single DVD, was filed on September 24. The staff and STP officials met October 11 for the first public meeting since the application was filed. NRC staffers outlined several issues during the meeting, including a lack of supporting documents for at least two sections, outdated data for one section, missing figures for another and, in one instance, the absence of state emergency preparedness plans that were cross-referenced in the application. • TVA Opts For AP1000 Design Instead Of Completing Partially Finished Existing Reactors. TVA is submitting the combined operating license request nearly two decades after work stopped in 1988 toward building two similar-sized reactors at Bellefonte. TVA officials determined that finishing those reactors, which the agency started building in 1973, would be too costly." Application will be the first involving construction of a Westinghouse AP1000 advanced reactor, made by Westinghouse Electric Co., which is owned by Japan's Toshiba Corp. • Grid Security A video released last month by CNN illustrates the potential danger to the power grid, experts say. While in the past, most had imagined a cyberattack might shut down patches of the US grid for a few days at worst, But the video shows a demonstration by the Idaho National Laboratory that a large electric generator shaking violently, spraying metal parts, and spewing smoke before grinding to a stop. The method of attack used in that demonstration could be replicated to destroy more and larger equipment, several experts say.
    [Show full text]
  • American Nuclear Society ANS 3.5
    ANSI/ANSANSI/ANS--3.53.5 DiscussionDiscussion OrganizationalOrganizational DefinitionsDefinitions ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup MembersMembers ANSI/ANSANSI/ANS--33--55 UsageUsage UpdateUpdate SummarySummary ofof ChangesChanges ANSI/ANSANSI/ANS--3.53.5 OrganizationalOrganizational DefinitionsDefinitions ANSANS -- AmericanAmerican NuclearNuclear SocietySociety ANSIANSI -- AmericanAmerican NationalNational StandardsStandards InstituteInstitute ANSANS--3.53.5 -- WorkingWorking GroupGroup isis comprisedcomprised ofof Industry,Industry, Regulatory,Regulatory, andand Organizational/IndividualOrganizational/Individual VolunteersVolunteers ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup MembershipMembership ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup BalanceBalance ofof InterestsInterests NRC-1 7% VENDORS-3 20% UTILITY-9 60% ORG-2 13% ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup MembersMembers ANSANS--3.53.5 OfficersOfficers ListList ChairChair -- TimothyTimothy DennisDennis – Individual (chair of ANS-21/member NFSC executive committee) ViceVice--chairchair -- JimJim FlorenceFlorence – Nebraska Public Power District - Cooper Nuclear Station SecretarySecretary -- KeithKeith WelchelWelchel – Duke Energy - Oconee Nuclear Station EditorEditor -- FF JJ (Butch)(Butch) ColbyColby – L3 Communications MAPPS Inc (formerly CAE) StyleStyle EditorEditor -- WilliamWilliam MM (Mike)(Mike) ShellyShelly – Entergy Services, Inc ParliamentarianParliamentarian –– LawrenceLawrence VickVick – U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission ANSANS--3.53.5 UtilitiesUtilities JamesJames
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Power Monthly December 1997
    DOE/EIA-0226(97/12) Distribution Category UC-950 Electric Power Monthly December 1997 With Data for September 1997 Energy Information Administration Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 mmwm OF m$ mumr is mmm This report was prepared by the Energy Information Administration, the independent statistical and analytical agency within the Department of Energy. The information contained herein should not be construed as advocating or reflecting any policy position of the Department of Energy or any other organization. Contacts The Electric Power Monthly is prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration. Questions and comments concerning the contents of the Electric Power Monthly may be directed to: Ms. Sandra Smith, Project Leader Energy Information Administration, EI-524 U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC, 20585 Telephone number: (202)426-1173 Internet E-Mail number: [email protected] or the following subject specialists: Subject Contact Phone Number Internet E-Mail Electricity Supply and Demand Forecast.. Rebecca McNerney 202-426-1251 [email protected] Industry Developments Kenneth McClevey 202-426-1144 [email protected] New Electric Generating Units Karen McDaniel 202-426-1234 [email protected] U.S. Electric Utility Net Generation Melvin E. Johnson 202-426-1172 [email protected] U.S. Electric Utility Consumption of Fuels . Melvin E. Johnson 202-426-1172 [email protected] U.S. Electric Utility Stocks of Fuels Melvin E. Johnson 202-426-1172 [email protected] U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 20071204-Ucs-Brief-Got-Water
    GOT WATER? Nuclear power plants are usually built next to lakes, rivers, and oceans.1 Not for the scenic views that such locales provide, but because water can absorb the waste heat produced by the plants. Nuclear power plants consume vast amounts of water during normal operation to absorb the waste heat left over after making electricity and also to cool the equipment and buildings used in generating that electricity. In event of an accident, nuclear power plants need water to remove the decay heat produced by the reactor core and also to cool the equipment and buildings used to provide the core’s heat removal. This issue brief describes the reliance of nuclear power plants on nearby bodies of water during normal operation and under accident conditions. All of the 104 nuclear reactors currently licensed to operate in the United States are light2 water reactors. Sixty-nine (69) are pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and 35 are boiling water reactors (BWRs). In a PWR, water flowing through the reactor core is In a BWR, water flowing through the reactor core is heated by its thermal energy. Because this water is heated by its thermal energy and boils. The steam flows maintained under high pressure (over 2,000 pounds per from the reactor vessel to the turbine. The steam spins the square inch), it does not boil even when heated to over turbine, which is connected to a generator that produces 500ºF. The hot water flows from the reactor vessel and electricity. The steam exits the turbine into the condenser. enters thousands of metal tubes within the steam Water from the nearby lake, river, or ocean flows through generator.
    [Show full text]
  • Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 & 3
    UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 July 19, 2017 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson Senior VP, Exelon Generation Co., LLC President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 SUBJECT: DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3—NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000237/2017002 AND 05000249/2017002 Dear Mr. Hanson: On June 30, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an integrated inspection at your Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3. On June 30, 2017, the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. J. Washko and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report. Based on the results of this inspection, one issue was self-revealed and was evaluated under the risk significance determination process as having very low safety significance (Green). The NRC has also determined a violation is associated with this issue. Because the licensee initiated a condition report to address this issue, the violation is being treated as a Non-Cited Violation (NCV), consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy. This NCV is described in the subject inspection report. If you contest the violations or significance of this NCV, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555–0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region III; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Dresden Nuclear Power Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornl/Nsic-176
    4 ggcBvePBtnc APR 291980 ORNL/NSIC-176 MASTER Descriptions of Selected Accidents that Have Occurred at Nuclear Reactor Facilities H. W. Bertini and Members of the Staff of the Nuclear Safety Information Center NUCLFAR SAFETY INFORMATION CENTER DIEmu'lhj \i 'uNLIMIlt.il c ORNL/NSIC-176 Contract No. W-7405-eng-26 Engineering Technology Division DESCRIPTIONS OF SFLEuTED ACCIDENTS THAT HAVE OCCURRED AT NUCLEAR REACTOR FACILITIES H. W. Bertini and Members of the Staff of the Nuclear Safety Information Center Date Published: April 1980 Prepared by the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORArORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 operated by UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION for the DEPARTMENT OP ENERGY tP MTOWiOtl Cf THIS MCU«»T It IHWWTW iii CONTENTS (7 Page FOREWORD ...» v PREFACE . vli 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. NUCLEAR REACTORS: FUNDAMENTALS .' 3 2.1 Basic Theory 3 2.2 The Components of a Nuclear Reactor 8 2.3 Radioactivity , 11 2.4 Electric Power Plants .... 16 2.5 Classification of Reactors 17 2.6 Light-Water Reactors for the Production of Electricity ..... 19 3. CENTRAL STATION POWER PLANTS. 32 3.1 Fuel Melting Incideat at the Fermi Reactor (1966) 32 3.2 Electrical Cable Fires at San Onofre 1 (1968) 33 3.3 Fuel Meltdown at St. Laurent (1969) 35 3.4 Uncovering of the Core at La Crosse (1970) 38 3.5 Seven Injured When Steam Nozzle Breaks at Robinson 2 (1970) 39 3.6 Discharge of Primary System into Drywell at Did 'en 2 (1970) 42 3.7 Turbine Damage Caused by Human Error at Robinson 2 (1970) 45 3.8 Construction Fire at Indian Point 2 (1971) 46 3.9 Valve Separations at Turkey Point 3 (1971) 47 3.10 Turbine Basement Flooded at Quad Cities V?I2) 48 3.11 Steam Generator Damaged in Hot Tests at Oconee 1 (1972) 49 3.12 Two Fatalities in Steam Line Accident at Surry 1 (1972) 50 3.13 Seawater Intrusion into Primary System at Millstone 1 (1972) ..
    [Show full text]
  • Cheap Natural Gas, Stagnant Power Demand, and Power Prices That
    Cheap natural gas, stagnant power demand, and power prices that have fallen significantly since 2008 have jeopardized the economics of about two-thirds of the nation’s 100-GW nuclear capacity, according to a working paper from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research. About 21 GW in merchant deregulated markets are retiring, or are at high risk of retiring the paper suggests. Here’s a profitability outlook for all 61 nuclear plants in the U.S. over the short term (between 2017 and 2019), according to the research entity. Source: “Early Nuclear Retirements in Deregulated U.S. Markets: Causes, Implications and Policy Options,” MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (March 2017) —Copy and artwork by Sonal Patel, a POWER associate editor. Millstone 14.8 Seabrook 14.0 Nine Mile Point 13.7 North Anna 13.7 James A. FitzPatrick 12.9 Indian Point 2 12.6 Pilgrim Nuclear 9.9 Calvert Cliffs 9.5 Indian Point 3 9.0 R.E. Ginna/Ontario Sta. 13 8.2 Surry 5.1 Davis Besse 4.5 Clinton Power Station 3.6 Perry 3.5 *Profitability is defined as the net pre-tax Limerick 1.9 Dresden 1.8 earnings of the individual facilities, Peach Bottom 1.7 calculated as the sum of energy sales, Donald C. Cook 1.4 capacity market revenue, and policy support Susquehanna 1.3 (subsidies if applicable) minus the cost of Braidwood Generating 0.8 generation. Salem 0.4 LaSalle County 0.3 St. Lucie 0.1 Beaver Valley –0.1 Palo Verde –0.5 Hope Creek –0.5 Grand Gulf –1.2 Alvin W.
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Fundamentals Examination Results
    October 7, 2019 THIS LETTER DISTRIBUTED TO THE FOLLOWING DOCKET NUMBERS: Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2, Docket No. 50-368 Columbia Generating Station, Docket No. 50-397 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Docket Nos. 50-275/323 River Bend Station, Unit 1, Docket No. 50-458 SUBJECT: GENERIC FUNDAMENTALS EXAMINATION RESULTS On September 4, 2019, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) administered the generic fundamentals examination (GFE) section of the written operator licensing examination to employees at your facility. Enclosed with this letter are copies of both forms of the examination, including answer keys, the grading results for your facility, and copies of the individual answer sheets for each of your employees. Please forward the results to the individuals along with the copies of their respective answer sheets. A “P” in the RESULTS column indicates that the individual achieved a passing grade of 80 percent or better on the GFE, while an “F” indicates that the individual failed the examination. If you have any questions concerning this examination, please contact Mr. Eric Cushing at 301-415-1064 and/or [email protected]. Sincerely, /RA Gregory E. Werner, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosures: As stated Reactor 50 dockets - 2 - cc w/enclosures: Dennis Kilpatrick, Training Manager Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc. 1448 S.R. 333 Russellville, AR 72802 Glenn Pierce, Manager Nuclear Training Columbia Generating Station Energy Northwest, MD-1023 P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA 99352-0968 Justin Rogers, Training Manager Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Power Plant P.O. Box 56, Mail Code 104/6 Avila Beach, CA 93424 Kevin Stupak, Manager Training Entergy Operations, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • ML12333A320.Pdf
    NLS2012124 Enclosure NLS2012124 ENCLOSURE COOPER NUCLEAR STATION FLOODING WALKDOWN REPORT H Nebraska Public Power District "Always there when you need us" CNS Memo 12-0002 To: Cooper Nuclear Station Licensing Department From: Cooper Nuclear Station Design Engineering Department CC: N/A Date: 11/26/2012 Re: Response to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Section 2.3 Flooding Validation and Acceptance of Vendor Provided Evaluations In response to the nuclear fuel damage at Fukushima Daiichi due to earthquake and subsequent tsunami, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.54 (f). As part of this request which is as defined in the Recommendation 2.3, Flooding, Enclosure 4 of the 50.54(f) Letter dated March 12, 2012, CNS was required to perform walkdowns to verify that plant features credited in the current licensing basis (CLB) for protection and mitigation from external flood events is available, functional, and properly maintained. In addition, the purpose of the walkdowns was to identify and address plant-specific degraded, non-conforming, or unanalyzed conditions (through the corrective action program) and associated APM (Available Physical Margin) and verify the adequacy of monitoring and maintenance procedures. This information was obtained in accordance with NEI 12-07, "Guidelines for Verification Walkdowns of Plant Flood Protection Features". This memo is being written for CNS Design Engineering to formally accept the walkdown packages, and final walkdown report as being technically accurate. The walkdowns were developed with APM determined from 906', which is what CNS is committed to the NRC to protect up to.
    [Show full text]
  • Operating License Renewal Stage Arkansas Nuclear
    Applicant’s Environmental Report – Operating License Renewal Stage Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit 1 Introduction Set forth below is Entergy Operations’ Environmental Report-Operating License Renewal Stage for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1. This report was prepared in conjunction with Entergy Operations’ application to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to renew the operating license for ANO-1. In compliance with applicable NRC requirements, this ER analyzes potential environmental impacts associated with renewal of the ANO-1 license. It is designed to assist the NRC staff with the preparation of the ANO-1 specific Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement that is required for license renewal. The content of the ER complies with the requirements of 10CFR Part 51, as augmented by the NRC’s “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants” (NUREG-1437). Specifically, the ANO-1 ER complies with 10CFR54.23, which requires license renewal applicants to submit a supplement to the ER that complies with requirements of Subpart A of 10CFR Part 51. This report also addresses the more detailed requirements of NRC environmental regulations in 10CFR51.45 and 10CFR51.53, as well as the underlying intent of the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. For major federal actions, the NEPA requires federal agencies to prepare a detailed statement that addresses significant environmental impacts, adverse environmental effects that cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented, alternatives to the
    [Show full text]