DOCSLIB.ORG

Front Matter Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Front Matter Template Copyright by Meredith Martin Rountree 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Meredith Martin Rountree Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: “The Things that Death will buy”: A Sociolegal Examination of Texas Death-Sentenced Prisoners Who Sought Execution Committee: E. Mark Warr, Supervisor Sheldon Ekland-Olson Debra Umberson Mary R. Rose John H. Blume “The Things that Death will buy”: A Sociolegal Examination of Texas Death-Sentenced Prisoners Who Sought Execution by Meredith Martin Rountree, A.B.; J.D. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2012 Dedication To RCO Acknowledgements None of this turned out as I had planned – for which I am profoundly grateful. I went to graduate school to “cool out” my reputation with certain criminal justice agencies and to gain some new skills. Just a few classes with Gideon Sjoberg, however, had me enthralled with the sociological enterprise. I continue to be influenced by the breadth and depth of his sociological vision. It was an honor to be his student. Like Professor Sjoberg, every member of this committee has taught and shaped me in ways I suspect they are scarcely aware. Mark Warr has been a wonderful companion in criminology, always encouraging, supportive, and generous in sharing his knowledge and insights. Sheldon Ekland-Olson and Deb Umberson spurred my inchoate interest in the sociology of death and dying. I was also fortunate enough to be teaching assistant to each, experiences that made me a better teacher. Mary Rose’s influence has extended even further. Her class on Law and Society convinced me that graduate school was the right choice for me. Her friendship and mentorship have been a great source of happiness, intellectual growth, and scholarly opportunity. John Blume has been an essential part of guiding my sociolegal investigation. The questions I asked, the information I sought, were inextricably connected to the lawyer he trained. Others have shaped my thinking as well. Rob Owen has been my constant (and patient) interlocutor throughout this project. Rob not only provided unstinting support and encouragement, but he also asked important substantive questions. His contribution to this work is immeasurable. I thank, too, Donna Brorby who took me inside Texas prisons and taught me the difference between compassion and sentimentality. Many men and women gave generously of their time in sharing their memories and impressions of the men I study here. I am sorry I am not able to thank them by name. v The Law and Society Association Graduate Student Workshop sparked some of the ideas that found their way into this study, and the American Bar Foundation’s intellectual community improved me in too many ways for me to list. I am particularly grateful to Susan Shapiro and Jothie Rajah. I am also grateful to the financial support provided by the American Bar Foundation Doctoral Fellowship, the Harry E. and Bernice M. Moore Fellowship of the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health, the Texas State University-San Marcos Predoctoral Fellowship program, the Proteus Action League, and the University of Texas Graduate Dean’s Prestigious Fellowship Supplement. In addition, I thank Tony Black and the staff at the Texas State Library and Archives Commission and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for their cheerful assistance. Many others helped me along the way. Carmen Gutierrez saved my bureaucratic bacon. Erin McGann and Paul King, Jim Marcus and Mia de St. Victor, Yolanda Torres and Jason Myers graciously welcomed me into their homes, despite my odd hours. Jane O’Connell helped secure me a quiet place to work. Roz Caldwell brought warmth and organization to my time in Chicago. Finally, I thank my family. While an Emily Dickinson poem seems an obvious choice to open a paper on death, she also represents where I come from. I am grateful for having been raised in a family where lifelong learning is the norm, and in a community where being a little different is too. vi “The Things that Death will buy”: A Sociolegal Examination of Texas Death-Sentenced Prisoners Who Sought Execution Meredith Martin Rountree, PhD. The University of Texas at Austin, 2012 Supervisor: E. Mark Warr This dissertation analyzes social and legal influences on Texas death-sentenced prisoners who hastened their own execution. Using variables derived from research on other types of decisions to hasten death, I compare these prisoners with other similarly- situated condemned prisoners who did not seek to hasten execution, and develop a theoretical model for their decisions. In addition, I examine both how these prisoners explain their decisions, and how court proceedings can shape these explanations. The dissertation concludes with a discussion of the sociolegal construction of different rights to die. vii Table of Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................. xiii List of Figures ................................................................................................................. xiv INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 PART ONE ........................................................................................................................ 3 Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................... 3 Review of Literature on Decisions to Hasten Death ...................................................... 3 Sociological risk factors for suicide ................................................................................ 7 Towards a theoretical model ......................................................................................... 14 Constructing meaning in death ..................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2 ......................................................................................................................... 20 Procedural and Historical Overview of Hastening Execution .................................... 20 The Texas death penalty conviction, sentencing, and appeals process ......................... 20 Representation by counsel ............................................................................................ 23 Court cases setting legal standards for hastening execution ......................................... 25 Important Texas cases ................................................................................................... 28 Summary ....................................................................................................................... 32 Chapter 3 ......................................................................................................................... 34 Study Design and Method .............................................................................................. 34 Developing data regarding subject population ............................................................. 34 Creating the comparison groups ................................................................................... 41 Matched Sample One (MS1) .................................................................................... 41 viii Matched Sample Two (MS2) .................................................................................... 42 Coding qualitative data ................................................................................................. 43 Limitations on data ....................................................................................................... 44 Profile of subjects ......................................................................................................... 45 Age ............................................................................................................................ 46 Educational attainment.............................................................................................. 50 PART TWO ..................................................................................................................... 51 Chapter 4 ......................................................................................................................... 51 Pathways to Hastened Execution ................................................................................... 51 Vulnerabilities ............................................................................................................... 51 Criminological characteristics ...................................................................................... 53 Criminal history and experiences with incarceration ................................................ 53 Characteristics of capital crime ................................................................................. 56 Intimate partner conflict related homicides .......................................................... 56 Commission of crime ............................................................................................ 57 Enhanced Motivation .................................................................................................... 59 Timing and triggers ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fictional Documentaries and Truthful Fictions: the Death Penalty in Recent American Film
    FICTIONAL DOCUMENTARIES AND TRUTHFUL FICTIONS: THE DEATH PENALTY IN RECENT AMERICAN FILM David R. Dow* When it comes to death, most Hollywood movies cheat. They cheat by tinkering with the truth, because the truth as it ac­ tually is is too complex or too disturbing to confront honestly. (The so-called happy ending is the most famous form of such cheating.) They cheat because people generally prefer happi­ ness and simplicity to darkness and complexity, especially where their entertainment is concerned, and filmmakers tend to give people what they want. Even great movies cheat. For example, last year's Oscar winner for best picture, American Beauty, cheats egregiously. The movie (for the one or two of you who have not seen it) deals with modern times: It is about suburbia, men and women who mindlessly pursue meaningless careers, bigotry, and finally, hope and redemption. In the end, the character played by Kevin Spacey is murdered. This is not a surprise ending because the Spacey character narrates the movie in a voice-over, and he tells us as the movie opens that in less than a year he will no longer be alive. We know at the beginning that 110 minutes later Kevin Spacey's character will be dead. Spacey plays a morally ambiguous character. He is in the midst of a full-blown mid-life crisis. He is a lousy husband and a worse father. For virtually the entire length of the film, he lusts after his daughter's high school classmate. In the end, however, he gently rebuffs a neighbor's homosexual advance and-again * George Butler Research Professor of Law, University of Houston Law Center.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Scottish Rite Masonry in Texas, Represents Personal Sacrifices
    PD Commons PD Books PD Commons aforttell Ittitteraitg ffiibrarg JItiiata. N«ta Qnck FROM THE BENNO LOEWY LIBRARY COLLECTEOa BY BENNO LOEWY 1654-1919 BEQUEATHED TO CORNELL UNIVERSITY PD Books PD Commons Visitor? of ^tottigfiiaite ilagonr|>mt!rexas! COMPILED BY C. A. HOTCHKISS. 33° HON. COPYRIGHT APPLIED FOR JUNE 1. 1916 PD Books PD Commons PD Books PD Commons 7^^^: ^ ^^^:Ay<^.\y3 */i^W- preface In the preparation of this book, the author has sought solely to present an accurate and connected history of the rise and extension of Scottish Rite Masonry in Texas. The information which it contains has been compiled chiefly from the Masonic records in the archives of Philip C. Tucker, for free and frequent access to which the author is indebted to the widow and family of the late Grand Cornpiander. The only virtue that is claimed for this work is its cor- rect portrayal of the life of the Rite in Texas. The author, himself, at the time of writing, the oldest thirty-third de- gree Honorary Scottish Rite Mason in Texas, has drawn readily upon his more or less extensive fund of informa- tion concerning the Rite in this State, not for the purpose of writing down his recollections or beliefs concerning its establishment and progress, but merely for the sugges- tion of lines of investigation that carefully and definitely pursued might lead to the acquisition of data about the authenticity of which there could be no shadow of doubt. More than twelve months were spent in this undertak- ing. The author visited frequently the several Consis- tories of Texas and going once to Washington to examine the records of the Supreme Council for information un- obtainable here.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Rite Grand Almoner's Fund
    The Valley of Boston Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry & The Massachusetts Partner-Valleys of Lowell the Merrimack, Salem and Worcester GRAND MASTER’S CLASS Saturday, November 9th, 2019 MOST WORSHIPFUL PAUL F. GLEASON Why Pursue Scottish Rite Masonry? Although there is no more important degree than that of the Master Mason, the additional 29 Scottish Rite degrees serve to enrich a Brother’s comprehension of the philosophy and symbolic teaching he received when he was initiated into Freemasonry. When you choose to further your Masonic experience by becoming a 32° Scottish Rite Mason**, you will expand upon your knowledge of Freemasonry’s fundamental principles. The moral and ethical lessons we learn together, will continuously remind us of our duties to family, country, humanity, nature and the Great Architect of the Universe. You do not have to receive all 29 degrees to become a 32° Mason. However, receiving a minimum of five degrees is required. You must receive the 4° and 32°, along with 3 additional degrees. ** Despite its name (explained later in this brochure), the Scottish Rite welcomes all worthy Master Masons regardless of their ethnic origin. The Origins of the Scottish Rite A vague reference to the name "Scottish Rite" can be found in a manuscript dating back to 1733: ''Lodge #115 meeting at the Devil Tavern near Temple Bar in London was described as a Scott's Masons Lodge." The exact origin of the name, however, still remains a mystery to this day. A plausible explanation might be found in late 17th-century European history. When the British Isles were torn by political and religious conflicts, many Scots from the nobility, particularly from the Stuart dynasty, fled to France to seek King Louis XIV's protection.
    [Show full text]
  • New Anj Concert Policy Raises Questions See Story on Page 4
    Otttuttfttntf Sathj dampus Serving Storrs Since 1896 VOL.LXIXNO. 18 STORRS. CONNECTICUT October 15,1971 new anj concert policy raises questions See Story on Page 4 asg—daily campus contract defeated in student senate A proposed contract of $12,500 to operate the Daily Campus for one semester was defeated Wednesday mgnt in the Student Senate. Stephen P. Morin, editor-in-chief, said the paper would have difficulty operating on its allotted $22,500 a year. Ron Robillard, managing editor, pointed out that the Student Government is merely buying a product and should have no voice in editorial policy. See story on Page 5. husky varsity teams to be entertained by black bears The UConn Huskies are entertained on all three varsity levels by the Maine Black Bears this weekend. A soccer match between the YanCon rivals will kick-off the festivities with a 10 a.m. start followed by a cross country meet at 11 a.m. The Husky gridders, 1-3, will try to spoil Maine's Homecoming and come away with a 'must* win in order to stay in contention for the Yankee Conference crown. Coach Bob Caseiola remains optimistic in the race for the Beanpot, symbolic of championship. See story on page 8. a what? 450 students, yelling 'we want underwear' and other , more obscene chants, invaded South Campus this morning in the first panty-raid at UConn in nearly three years. Security kept tabs on the excited crowd but made no attempt to interfere or arrest anyone. R.A.'s were present with big grins.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Report One Answer Peoplesoft
    Twenty Questions PeopleSoft PeopleSoft 1999 Corporate Report 1999 Corporate PeopleSoft One Answer PeopleSoft PeopleSoft 1999 Corporate Report Is there a way to have my eBusiness questions answered? “Can we target our most profitable customers?” “Is this the best use of our resources?” “Do we have the resources to make this decision work?” “Will we save money if we centralize this function?” “Are our field technicians as efficient as they can be?” “Is it more cost-effective to manufacture in another country?” “Do we know the impact of a shorter delivery time?” “Do we know why sales are up in this region?” “Do we have the right employees to make this happen?” “Does anyone care if we change this service?” “Is our student financial aid boosting graduation rates?” “Have we talked with this customer recently?” “Are we selling to the right market?” “Will this be more profitable than conventional brick-and-mortar?” “Can we bring this project in on time?” “Are we delivering products on time?” “Can we increase output without sacrificing quality?” “Can we rely on these sales forecasts for demand planning?” “If everything is under control, can I take my vacation now?” PeopleSoft has the answer. Ye s . eBusiness changes all the rules. To adapt quickly and suc- ceed in the new Internet economy, you need solutions that will maximize your return on investment, lower your long-term cost of ownership, and fit into your existing environment. Only PeopleSoft offers an integrated suite of enterprise, customer relationship management, eBusiness, and analytic applications Ð best-of-breed tools that are not only ready for the Web, but are designed to position your company for success in the new economy.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Us Death Penalty
    About The Us Death Penalty Gyratory Scarface debilitated no lubricants disobliged ardently after Terrance peptizes daftly, quite pyaemic. chemotropicGranted Konstantin Kermie repulsing,sulphuret histhat meats carder. worries swabs indoors. Er still magnetizing melodiously while Sixteen states from participation in the execution team members are about death penalty as a routine medical licensing is The public is concerned about illegal immigrants from Mexico and associates them with crime. By doing so, we continue to uplift their humanity throughout the process. Finally, I discuss the limitations of the current work and suggest hypotheses for further research. Please visit our ability to death penalty across the about us has been weighed the execution method of the relatively meaningless if either potassium as you? In the following decades, implementation of the death penalty dropped significantly. In the past decade, the work of various innocence projects has had tremendous impact on attitudes about capital punishment in the US and elsewhere. Set body class for different user state. Remove all ads and leave only your desired content. Setting user entitlement class. Mexico has criticised the case raising of death penalty alone on. These appeals are essential because some inmates have come within hours of execution before evidence was uncovered proving their innocence. Unless it can be demonstrated that the death penalty, and the death penalty alone, does in fact deter crimes of murder, we are obligated to refrain from imposing it when other alternatives exist. Create an account to get election deadline reminders and more. The central question now is whether he has the political will and moral strength to exercise it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Execution of Gary Gilmore
    The execution of Gary Gilmore. As of December 31st, 1976 there had been no executions in the USA for nine and a half years, after the Supreme Court suspended the death penalty in 1968. The previous execution was that of 48 year old Luis Jose Monge who was put to death in Colorado’s gas chamber on June 2nd, 1967. In the landmark case of Furman v Georgia in 1972 the Supreme Court invalidated all states’ death penalty statutes on the grounds of arbitrariness and they had to rewrite their statutes as a result. The new guidelines allowed for the introduction of aggravating and mitigating factors at the sentencing phase of trials. The new statutes were approved in 1976 in the case of Gregg v. Georgia, clearing the way for a resumption of executions. The first post Furman execution was carried out the following year in the glare of worldwide media interest. On Monday January 17th, 1977, 36 year old Gary Mark Gilmore (opposite) was put to death by firing squad in Utah. Gilmore’s execution was voluntary and he put up a strenuous campaign to be allowed to die. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), among other groups, put up an equally strenuous fight to prevent the execution, seeing it as “opening the floodgates” for future ones. Utah Governor Scott Matheson wanted to grant a stay but found that he didn’t have the power to. The ACLU managed to persuade U S District Court Judge Willis Ritter to grant a stay just 7 hours before the scheduled execution.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Utah Have a Death Penalty
    Does Utah Have A Death Penalty regencies!Septicemic Seligand calligraphicalis benedictional Purcell and mast:plenishes which tidily Arturo while is boskiestuntended Spencer enough? man Diplomatical and sprains. and Arkansan Esau never raced his Automation and services, he reasoned that utah have a death does not Hundreds of writing for money will not extending its firing squad? The penalty that utah have death does a penalty, or try again, virginia colony commonly granted a separate filing, assistant attorney stephen howard practices as a race. Stacey Plaskett reacts to Sen. The gust of death does it deter deer be murders. Interested in the firing squad, a life sentence must have rarely sought the death does a penalty? Please check back later. Wilkerson and iran engenders negative publicity stunt or that penalty does utah have a death penalty immoral for swearingen to human dignity of his mouth. Methods of execution by state Electric chair firing squad. United states in arizona have mercy and suffering from. Method of execution in three states Mississippi Oklahoma and Utah Source death Penalty Information Center deathpenaltyinfoorg. Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina and Washington to build bipartisan support in legislatures where rancor between parties has stymied scores of other bills. Many opponents of capital punishment feel whether it is morally wrong. Utah death-row inmate featured in health-selling book dies. This content represents the views and opinions of the advertiser, who is responsible or all ridicule the material contained therein. Many benefit that wield death penalty is yellow and unusual punishment and therefore unconstitutional. Execution any historical memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Sectarian Reflections on Lawyers' Ethics and Death Row Volunteers Richard W
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 77 Article 2 Issue 3 Propter Honoris Respectum 3-1-2002 Sectarian Reflections on Lawyers' Ethics and Death Row Volunteers Richard W. Garnett University of Notre Dame, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Recommended Citation Richard W. Garnett, Sectarian Reflections on Lawyers' Ethics and Death Row Volunteers, 77 Notre Dame L. Rev. 795 (2002). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol77/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SECTARIAN REFLECTIONS ON LAWYERS' ETHICS AND DEATH ROW VOLUNTEERS Richard W. Garnett* In a recent episode of the award-winningjuris-drama, The Practice, Rebecca Ward-one of the idealistic, if occasionally overzealous, young lawyers in Bobby Donnell's high-powered trial boutique-is asked to assist John Mockler, a legendary capital defense lawyer, by serving as local counsel in a federal death penalty case.' Rebecca's enthusiasm for the project wanes briefly upon learning that the con- demned inmate, Walter Dawson, has elected not to fight his impend- ing execution, but quickly waxes again as she sets out for the federal prison in Indiana, determined to convince him to cling to life. She fails. Dawson insists that he is not afraid to die. He assures Rebecca that, having accepted from Christ the gifts of redemption and forgiveness, and committed himself to God's service, he is ready to accept the punishment he believes his "atrocities" require.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolving Standards, Botched Executions and Utah's Controversial Use of the Firing Squad
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 50 Issue 3 Article 3 2003 Nothing Less than the Dignity of Man: Evolving Standards, Botched Executions and Utah's Controversial Use of the Firing Squad Christopher Q. Cutler Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Christopher Q. Culter, Nothing Less than the Dignity of Man: Evolving Standards, Botched Executions and Utah's Controversial Use of the Firing Squad, 50 Clev. St. L. Rev. 335 (2002-2003) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTHING LESS THAN THE DIGNITY OF MAN: EVOLVING STANDARDS, BOTCHED EXECUTIONS AND UTAH’S CONTROVERSIAL USE OF THE FIRING SQUAD CHRISTOPHER Q. CUTLER1 Human justice is sadly lacking in consolation; it can only shed blood for blood. But we mustn’t ask that it do more than it can.2 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 336 II. HISTORICAL USE OF UTAH’S FIRING SQUAD........................ 338 A. The Firing Squad from Wilderness to Statehood ................................................................. 339 B. From Statehood to Furman ......................................... 347 1. Gary Gilmore to the Present Death Row Crowd ................................................ 357 2. Modern Firing Squad Procedure .......................... 363 III. EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE ................................ 365 A. A History of Pain ......................................................... 366 B. Early Supreme Court Cases......................................... 368 C. Evolving Standards of Decency and the Dignity of Man...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Winter 2005 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Director of Research and Student Services, Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Winter 2005 (As of January 1, 2005) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 3,455 Race of Defendant: White 1,576 (45.62%) Black 1,444 (41.79%) Latino/Latina 356 (10.30%) Native American 39 ( 1.13%) Asian 40 ( 1.16%) Unknown at this issue 1 ( .03%) Gender: Male 3,401 (98.44%) Female 54 ( 1.56%) Juveniles: Male 79 ( 2.29%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 40 (Underlined jurisdiction has statute but no sentences imposed) Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 13 Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 Alaska, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. Death Row U.S.A. Page 2 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Fall 2004 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2004 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS Fourth Amendment Devenpeck v. Alford, No. 03-710 (Probable cause to arrest and qualified immunity) (decision below Alford v.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illusion of Control “Consensual” Executions, the Impending Death of Timothy Mcveigh, and the Brutalizing Futility of Capital Punishment
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The illusion of control “Consensual” executions, the impending death of Timothy McVeigh, and the brutalizing futility of capital punishment The death penalty cannot be useful, because of the example of barbarity it gives men. On crimes and punishments, Cesare Beccaria, 1764. There is no proof that the death penalty ever made a single murderer recoil when he had made up his mind, whereas clearly it had no effect but one of fascination on thousands of criminals; in other regards, it constitutes a repulsive example, the consequences of which cannot be foreseen. Reflections on the guillotine, Albert Camus, 1957. If...we are to be sincere in our efforts to reduce violence, there is one type of violence that we can with complete certainty eliminate. That is the killing of criminals by the state. The question is, will people learn to respect life better by threat or by example? And the uniform answer of history, comparative studies and experience is that man is an emulative animal. Norval Morris and Gordon Hawkins, US criminologists. A defendant’s voluntary submission to a barbaric punishment does not ameliorate the harm that imposing such a punishment causes to our basic societal values and to the integrity of our system of justice. Certainly a defendant’s consent to being drawn and quartered or burned at the stake would not license the State to exact such punishments. Whitmore v Arkansas, US Supreme Court, Justice Marshall dissenting, 1990. The death penalty, guns, violence in society, these cast a large cloud on America’s moral leadership.
    [Show full text]