DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Entrepreneurship: Sociality, Ethics and Politics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Entrepreneurship: Sociality, Ethics and Politics View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Goldsmiths Research Online SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP: SOCIALITY, ETHICS AND POLITICS Carolina Bandinelli Supervisors: Dr. Stefanie Petschick Prof. Adam Arvidsson Ph.D. Thesis Centre for Cultural Studies Goldsmihts, University of London London, 2017 1 I, Carolina Bandinelli, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. ………………………………………………………………….. Signed Date 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5) Acknowledgements 7) Abstract 8) Prologue 12) Introduction 33) Chapter I – Social Entrepreneurship: A Literature Search 33) Introduction 34) Social entrepreneurship: a brief overview 38) Social entrepreneurship: a pre-paradigmatic field 41) European and US narratives 44) The European School of Thought: Bureaucracy 47) The Social Innovation School of Thought: Charisma 52) Looking for the social 57) Make Money Doing Good 58) Conclusion 59) Chapter II – Theoretical Framework: The Self at Work in Neoliberal Societies 59) Introduction 61) The ambiguity of entrepreneurship 65) Enterprise and neoliberalism 68) The entrepreneur of the self 70) Entrepreneurs of the self and the death of the collective 72) The self at work 75) Individualisation 77) Individualisation as lived 81) Understanding social entrepreneurs’ subjectivity and regime of truth 85) Sociality, Ethics, and politics 94) Conclusion 96) Chapter III – Methodology: Ethnography as a Process of Subjectivation 90) Introduction 93) Beyond Interviews, towards ethnography 96) The uncertainty of the field(work) 100) Impact Hub as a platform 103) Fieldwork in a network sociality 107) An Ethnography of the self 111) Ethnography as a dialogue 114) Reflexivity and ethical dilemmas 3 117) Ethnography as a process of subjectivation 120) Conclusion 122) Chapter IV – The Sociality of Social Entrepreneurs 122) Introduction 125) The performative context 126) Sociality at work 129) The rise of coworking spaces: the social back to work 133) Impact Hub: a place where to meet 137) Compulsory friendship and opportunism 140) Sociality ot be learnt 144) The production of the self 146) Conclusion 148) Chapter V – The Individualised Ethics of Social Entrepreneurs 148) Introduction 149) Ethics 152) Individualised ethics 157) Changing the world? A matter of the self 160) Social entrepreneurship as a hermeneutic of the self 166) Private wealth and ethical feelings 170) The ethical neutrality of entrepreneurial means 174) Conclusion 175) Chapter VI – The Experiential Post-Politics of Social Entrepreneurs 175) Introduction 178) Politics 180) The political passion of social entrepreneurs 184) Experiential a-systemic politics 188) Individuals of the World Unite! 191) Entrepreneurship as a method 195) Solutionism and neoliberalism 198) Social entrepreneurship as a post-political phenomenon 203) Conclusion 204) Conclusion 221) Bibliography 135) Fig 1 and Fig 2. Photos taken by the author 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Six years have passed since I began my doctorate, and I would not have made it without the emotional support and intellectual inspiration I received from many people. In the most difficult phases of the research I imagined myself writing this acknowledgement, a moment of sweetness tinged with a hint of nostalgia. Now that moment has come, and I am glad. I want to begin by thanking Angela McRobbie, who suggested doing a Ph.D., and whose inputs have contributed to shaping this thesis since its very early phases. I also wish to thank Sian Prime: engaging in a dialogue with her was crucial to understand the topic of this research. There is a person without whom I couldn’t have endured all the ups and downs of these years: he is Adam Arvidsson. And I want to deeply thank Stefanie Petschick, she has given me the guidance I needed and got me to this point in a professional yet sympathetic way. Writing a thesis is made up of endless days sitting behind a desk, struggling. For most of those days I was not alone: Paolo Ruffino has been by my side, as a dear friend and peer. With him, boredom and fatigue became something to laugh about, something memorable and special. Certainly, the best moments of my Ph.D. have been those where I could engage in deep dialogues, and mix high theory with pop culture and sheer nonsense. For these moments, I thank Alessandro Gandini and Alberto Cossu: friends, colleagues, super heroes and spiritual guides. There is another super hero and spiritual guide, the most important person in my life: my brother Arturo Bandinelli. He has experienced with me every tiny step of this journey, and I bet he is happier than me now that it is over! I want to thank all my friends, especially my guardian angel Nino, my Socia Giuditta and my brother Luca, who, at times, reminded me that a Ph.D. thesis isn’t the only thing in life! Finally, I thank my mother and father, because they have always told me: “Write! Carolina, write!” 5 For Beatrice and Zoe 6 ABSTRACT Social entrepreneurship is a growing cultural phenomenon that involves a variety of actors – politicians, academics, business men and women, private citizens - across a range of interconnected fields – e.g. social work, sustainable development, the sharing economy and technological innovation. Notwithstanding its heterogeneous manifestations, social entrepreneurship is characterised by the attempt to re-embed social and ethical dimensions within the individualised conduct of the entrepreneur of the self. The aim of this dissertation is to investigate how this process is thought of and negotiated on a subjective level by young social entrepreneurs in London and Milan. Based on an understanding of social entrepreneurs as individuals who perceive work as a means for self-expression, I contextualise this enquiry within the field of cultural studies on the changing nature of labour in neoliberal societies. This thesis draws on an 18-month period of multi-sited and reflexive fieldwork that involved recorded interviews, participant observation and action research. Combining thick ethnographic descriptions and theoretical analysis, I focus on social entrepreneurs’ understanding of sociality, ethics, and politics, in so far as they are intertwined with the discourses and practices of entrepreneurship. My argument develops in three stages: to begin with, I show that social entrepreneurs engage in opportunistic and compulsory sociality; then, I dwell on social entrepreneurs’ individualised form of ethics; finally, I contend that social entrepreneurs enact and embody a post-political subjectivity. This subjectivity is defined by discourses and actions whose scope and significance are restrained within the bounds of individuals’ experience and influence. What remains inevitably excluded from this conception of politics is the possibility to of formulating a structural analysis of social issues. In this respect, my research may be regarded as a study on how the neoliberal subject par excellence – the entrepreneur of the self – attempts to retrieve and reclaim her political and ethical agency, and what the implications and limits of this endeavour are. 7 PROLOGUE One warm day in July, in a smart café in Milan, I am waiting for Veronica, an independent fashion designer. She finally arrives. She wears a long grey linen dress. Coral polish on her nails. She tells me she wants to make clothes following a different “philosophy”: she does not want to exploit cheap labour forces in developing countries. She neither wants to save on the quality of the materials, nor she wants to follow the aesthetic rules dictated by mainstream fashion. Rather, she wants to do “things differently”, producing garments that “last over time”. Sipping her piping hot double espresso, she vaguely hints at the “economic, moral and environmental” crisis and declares that “things must change”. The details of the auspicated “change” remain mostly obscure, but the desire to tackle some of the backlashes of neoliberal capitalism is expressed enthusiastically. Joanna, a Danish woman who lives in London, reveals a similar attitude: she wants to create a fashion collection involving the community. “People need to feel actively part of the brand” she explains “after all, fashion is such an intimate thing… we need to change the mode of production and include ordinary people, as many people as possible!” Joanna lives in a newly re-decorated flat in Shoreditch, one of the most hipster boroughs of London. Next to her house there’s a Wholefood shop where a loaf of bread costs about three pounds. On the other side, there’s a brand-new bar that serves ‘organic cocktails’ in antique tea pots, and plays vinyl records. In her minimalist living room there is a canvas she is about to complete: “I need to express my creative potential” she says, probably to offer an explanation for the painting paraphernalia spread on the wooden floor. Pouring red wine into a big stem glass, Joanna tells me about her career projects: “I had been working for the big names, you know? But what’s the point in working for someone else?” Of course, the question is rhetoric. “So I quit my job and decided to set up my enterprise… I needed to do something I believe in, something to improve the world, at least a bit!” she utters persuasively, just before proposing a movie night. 8 Alfredo is the same age as Veronica and Joanna, he is Italian and lives in North London. He dresses in a casual-sport styles. He loves nature, hiking, and mountain biking. He is trying to change the world too. In Italy, he worked for a major bank, he earned a very good salary, and was living with his girlfriend of ten years. He was ready to settle down. But he ditched everything. He could not stand working for people who did not share his “values”. He felt “depressed”. “I needed to change”, he tells me over a pint of pale ale: “I wanted to do something to change how things are, I wanted to have an impact!”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sensory and Cognitive Adaptations to Social Living in Insect Societies Tom Wenseleersa,1 and Jelle S
    COMMENTARY COMMENTARY Sensory and cognitive adaptations to social living in insect societies Tom Wenseleersa,1 and Jelle S. van Zwedena A key question in evolutionary biology is to explain the solitarily or form small annual colonies, depending upon causes and consequences of the so-called “major their environment (9). And one species, Lasioglossum transitions in evolution,” which resulted in the pro- marginatum, is even known to form large perennial euso- gressive evolution of cells, organisms, and animal so- cial colonies of over 400 workers (9). By comparing data cieties (1–3). Several studies, for example, have now from over 30 Halictine bees with contrasting levels of aimed to determine which suite of adaptive changes sociality, Wittwer et al. (7) now show that, as expected, occurred following the evolution of sociality in insects social sweat bee species invest more in sensorial machin- (4). In this context, a long-standing hypothesis is that ery linked to chemical communication, as measured by the evolution of the spectacular sociality seen in in- the density of their antennal sensillae, compared with sects, such as ants, bees, or wasps, should have gone species that secondarily reverted back to a solitary life- hand in hand with the evolution of more complex style. In fact, the same pattern even held for the socially chemical communication systems, to allow them to polymorphic species L. albipes if different populations coordinate their complex social behavior (5). Indeed, with contrasting levels of sociality were compared (Fig. whereas solitary insects are known to use pheromone 1, Inset). This finding suggests that the increased reliance signals mainly in the context of mate attraction and on chemical communication that comes with a social species-recognition, social insects use chemical sig- lifestyle indeed selects for fast, matching adaptations in nals in a wide variety of contexts: to communicate their sensory systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Following the Trail of Ants: an Examination of the Work of E.O
    Sacred Heart University DigitalCommons@SHU Writing Across the Curriculum Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) 2012 Following The rT ail Of Ants: An Examination Of The orW k Of E.O. Wilson Samantha Kee Sacred Heart University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/wac_prize Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, Other Genetics and Genomics Commons, Philosophy of Science Commons, Religion Commons, and the Theory, Knowledge and Science Commons Recommended Citation Kee, Samantha, "Following The rT ail Of Ants: An Examination Of The orkW Of E.O. Wilson" (2012). Writing Across the Curriculum. 2. http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/wac_prize/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at DigitalCommons@SHU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Writing Across the Curriculum by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SHU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Samantha Kee RS 299-Writing With Public Purpose Dr. Brian Stiltner March 2, 2012 Following the trail of ants An examination of the work of E.O. Wilson Edward Osborne Wilson was a born naturalist, in every sense of the word. As a child growing up in Alabama, he collected and studied species of snakes, flies, and the insect that became the basis of his life’s work, ants. He made a goal to record every species of ant that could be found in Alabama—a childhood project that would eventually lead to his first scientific publication. By age 13, Wilson discovered a red, non-native ant in a local town in Alabama, and by the time he entered the University of Alabama, the fire ant had become a significant threat to the state’s agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Taming the Corporate Beast
    This essay was submitted as part of TNI's call for papers for its State of Power 2015 report. The essay was not shortlisted for the final report and therefore TNI does not take responsibility for its contents. However the Editorial Board appreciated the essay and it is posted here as recommended reading. Taming the Corporate Beast An earlier version of this article was published by Dollars and Sense in its July and November 2014 issues. Marianne Hill, Ph.D. The litany of economic disasters in national headlines changes regularly, but a recurring theme is the role of transnational corporations (TNCs) in creating or exacerbating each new calamity. After the 2008 financial crisis, the near nuclear meltdown at Fukushima, the massive BP oil spill, and more, there is global awareness of the dire consequences of tolerating corporate misbehavior and greed. Despite their rhetoric, the priorities of TNCs are fundamentally at odds with the basic social goal of enhancing human freedoms and well-being. It can no longer be denied that the institutional framework regulating global giants requires a thorough transformation. Such a restructuring of our major institutions depends on the liberating knowledge that is being developed through the collective work of agents of change. In this article, I focus on efforts to bring structural changes to corporations that would bring new standpoints to corporate decision- making bodies and, in this way, change the values and control of corporates. I begin with a look at current soul-searching in the business community and efforts that have, at best, beautified the corporate beast.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Enterprises: Examining Accountability for Social and Financial Performance
    SOCIAL ENTERPRISES: EXAMINING ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SOCIAL AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Gloria Astrid Guraieb Izaguirre B.A. Financial Management Principal supervisor: Associate Professor Belinda Luke Associate supervisor: Dr Craig Furneaux Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business (Research) School of Accountancy QUT Business School Queensland University of Technology December 2015 Keywords Accountability, social enterprise, financial, social, performance, non-profit, third sector, Australia Social enterprises: Examining accountability for social and financial performance i Abstract This study explores the accountability of social enterprises with respect to their dual objectives of social and financial performance. During the last two decades, social enterprises have been subject to increasing public attention and research. This interest derives from the potential role of social enterprises to pursue a social mission through a self-funding commercial business model, rather than relying on philanthropy to survive. However, there is little research exploring how social enterprises exercise their accountability for both social and financial performance. Given that social enterprises seek to balance dual objectives, maintaining financial sustainability for long-term survival while also fulfilling their social mission, it is important to examine how these organisations balance accountability for these potentially conflicting goals. There is limited literature on social enterprise accountability, however, as third sector organisations, literature on accountability of non-profit organisations is a useful point of reference. In the context of non-profit organisations, concerns of mission drift and prioritising accountability to donors (as a main funding source) have been raised, where financial objectives may inadvertently override social objectives. Given the social and financial objectives of social enterprises, these issues are also relevant to their accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Models of Creating Social Impact Through Trading Activities
    The 3 Models of Social Enterprise: Creating social impact through trading activities Introduction Within the emerging social investment market, the same words frequently mean different things to different people. In particular, the label “social enterprise” can be especially problematic. In part, this is because there is no shared understanding of the underlying business models beneath the “social enterprise” umbrella. For investors, as the number of organisations labelled as “social enterprises” proliferates, it is becoming increasingly urgent to agree, and then to adopt, a common methodology for disentangling the assessment of financial risk from the likelihood of an investment achieving social returns. Others have already written about ways in which social enterprises may be categorised and described1. We wish to contribute to this ongoing discussion by outlining Venturesome’s current thinking about this issue. This paper introduces a conceptual framework which we hope both investors and investees will find useful as a guide to thinking through how different business models create social impact - and the consequences of this for generating financial returns. The 3 Models Framework We believe that there are three fundamental ways that social impact2 can be created through trading activities: • Model 1 – Engage in a trading activity that has no direct social impact, make a profit, and then transfer some or all of that profit to another activity that does have direct social impact • Model 2 – Engage in a trading activity that does have direct social impact, but manage a trade-off between producing financial return and social impact • Model 3 – Engage in a trading activity that not only has direct social impact, but also generates a financial return in direct correlation to the social impact created It is important to note that these three models are statements of fact, not judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Social Enterprise & the Triple Bottom Line the Triple Bottom
    Introduction to Social Enterprise & the Triple Bottom Line Drew Tulchin Managing Partner Social Enterprise Associates Webinar for Bankers without Borders Nov 30, 2012 About Social Enterprise Associates Consulting firm ‐ Registered ‘B Corp’ This network of experts offers consulting & capital raising to triple bottom line efforts ‐ for people, profits, planet. Registered ‘B Corporation’ , recognized: 2011 'One of the Best for the World‘ Small Businesses 2012 Honoree, Sustainable Business of the Year Drew Tulchin, Managing Partner, MBA • Former Program Officer, Grameen Foundation • Written >100 business/strategic plans; efforts raised >$100 million • Biz plan winner, Global Social Venture Comp; raised $1.2 mil. in social investment • Judge in international social enterprise & social business competitions Consulting Examples World Food Program: Investigated how to better engage private sector to raise $400 million. Wrote white paper on public‐private partnerships The SEEP Network: Worked with 5 int’l NGOs to develop business plans, hone products, enter new markets, & link to $ in the global North Future of Fish: Capital advisory for social entrepreneurs launching market‐based initiatives that drive sustainability, effic iency, and tbilittraceability in the seafdfood supply chihain. Plan International: Contributed to national studies in W. Africa on economic sector growth opportunities for young adults. Identified growth markets for 50,000 jobs in 3 years SW Native Green Loan Fund: Structured fund to involve small fdifoundations in public‐private
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Mechanisms for Innovative Social and Solidarity Economy Ecosystems
    Financial Mechanisms for Innovative 100 Social and Solidarity Economy 95 Ecosystems 75 25 5 0 Cover_BASE 11 November 2019 09:30:13 Financial Mechanisms for Innovative Social and Solidarity Economy Ecosystems Samuel Barco Serrano1, Riccardo Bodini2, Michael Roy,3 Gianluca Salvatori4 1 Co-founder and CEO, SOKIO Cooperative. 2 Director, Euricse. 3 Professor of Economic Sociology and Social Policy, Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health/Glasgow Schoof for Business and Society, Glasgow Caledonian University. 4 Secretary General, Euricse. Copyright © International Labour Organization 2019 First published 2019 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Financial mechanisms for innovative social and solidarity economy ecosystems –
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Methods Offer Powerful Insights Into Social Evolution in Bees Sarah Kocher, Robert Paxton
    Comparative methods offer powerful insights into social evolution in bees Sarah Kocher, Robert Paxton To cite this version: Sarah Kocher, Robert Paxton. Comparative methods offer powerful insights into social evolution in bees. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2014, 45 (3), pp.289-305. 10.1007/s13592-014-0268-3. hal- 01234748 HAL Id: hal-01234748 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01234748 Submitted on 27 Nov 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie (2014) 45:289–305 Review article * INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France, 2014 DOI: 10.1007/s13592-014-0268-3 Comparative methods offer powerful insights into social evolution in bees 1 2 Sarah D. KOCHER , Robert J. PAXTON 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA 2Institute for Biology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany Received 9 September 2013 – Revised 8 December 2013 – Accepted 2 January 2014 Abstract – Bees are excellent models for studying the evolution of sociality. While most species are solitary, many form social groups. The most complex form of social behavior, eusociality, has arisen independently four times within the bees.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction:Thinking Through Sociality
    Thinking through Sociality THINKING THROUGH SOCIALITY An Anthropological Interrogation of Key Concepts Edited by _ Vered Amit Published in 2015 by Berghahn Books www.berghahnbooks.com © 2015 Vered Amit All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without written permission of the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Amit, Vered, 1955- Thinking through sociality : an anthropological interrogation of key concepts / edited by Vered Amit. pages cm Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-78238-585-1 (hardback) -- ISBN 978-1-78238-586-8 (ebook) 1. Ethnology. 2. Social interaction. 3. Anthropology. I. Title. GN325.A44 2015 302--dc23 2014033522 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-78238-585-1 (hardback) ISBN 978-1-78238-586-8 (ebook) Contents Acknowledgements vi _ Introduction Thinking through Sociality: The Importance of 1 Mid-level Concepts Vered Amit with Sally Anderson, Virginia Caputo, John Postill, Deborah Reed-Danahay and Gabriela Vargas-Cetina 1 Disjuncture: The Creativity of, and Breaks in, Everyday 21 Associations and Routines Vered Amit 2 Fields: Dynamic Configurations of Practices, Games and 47 Socialities John Postill 3 Social Space: Distance, Proximity
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Cooperation Cooperation Vs
    Cooperation Main points for today Cooperation • Sociality, cooperation, mutualism, altruism - definitions • Kin selection – Hamilton’s rule, how to calculate r Why is it surprising and • Group selection – the price equation, green beards, and assortment how does it evolve • Classic examples – alarm calls, helpers at the nest, social insects, predator inspection, food sharing Definitions ‘Social behavior’ is NOT cooperative behavior Cooperation: Displaying a behavior that benefits another Group living vs. cooperation individual. (If both benefit that's mutualism.) Sociality-no- Altruism: cooperation Displaying a behavior that benefits another and individual at a cost to oneself. cooperation- Sociality/social behavior: no-sociality Living in a group/behavior in interactions with conspecifics I define ‘sociality’ as living with other individuals of the same species at least semi-permanently. Why individuals do not sacrifice themselves The evolutionary mystery for the good of the group How can altruism evolve? • If the recipient of the cooperative/altruistic act benefits, it is going to leave more offspring . • The actor however is not going to leave more offspring, or even fewer offspring – fewer altruists in the next generation . If such behavior is heritable, and it goes on over many generations, it will ultimately die out. 1 The evolutionary mystery Evolution of altruism Altruism: 5 possible Group selection explanations The Price equation : shows how variance partitioned among individuals and groups leads to selection • Group selection
    [Show full text]
  • Activist Social Entrepreneurship: a Case Study of the Green Campus Co-Operative
    Activist Social Entrepreneurship: A Case Study of the Green Campus Co-operative By: Madison Hopper Supervised By: Rod MacRae A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 31 July 2018 1 Table of Contents ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................. 4 FOREWORD........................................................................................................................................................ 7 INTRODUCTION: WHO’S TO BLAME?.......................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................... 12 SOCIAL ENTERPRISES ............................................................................................................................................... 12 Hybrid Business Models ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Mission Quality - TOMS shoes ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Integrity of Social Entrepreneurs
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Achleitner, Ann-Kristin; Lutz, Eva; Mayer, Judith; Spiess-Knafl, Wolfgang Working Paper Disentangeling gut feeling: Assessing the integrity of social entrepreneurs Working Paper, No. 2011-03 Provided in Cooperation with: Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies (CEFS), Technische Universität München Suggested Citation: Achleitner, Ann-Kristin; Lutz, Eva; Mayer, Judith; Spiess-Knafl, Wolfgang (2011) : Disentangeling gut feeling: Assessing the integrity of social entrepreneurs, Working Paper, No. 2011-03, Technische Universität München, Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies (CEFS), München This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50532 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung
    [Show full text]