Morpeth Road Drainage and the Water Environment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Morpeth Road Drainage and the Water Environment Chapter 13 Road Drainage and the Water Environment Document Reference MNB Part 6.1.14 Regulation Reference 5(2)(a) PINS Reference Number TR010010 AECOM A1-SENSLR: MNB – Environmental Impact Assessment – Volume 2: Environmental Statement 13-2 Chapter 13 Road Drainage and the Water Environment Introduction 13.1 This Chapter presents the assessment of the proposed bypass on the water environment. This includes a consideration of the potential effects on surface water quality, hydrogeology and flood risk. It sets out the environmental baseline, describes the scope and assessment methodology, presents the findings of the assessment, of likely effects for the construction and operation phases and any mitigation measures that have been taken into account. 13.2 Part 3 of the ES contains the following supporting information: Appendix 13.1 Legislation, Planning Policy and Scoping Consultation; Appendix 13.2 Surface Runoff Assessment (Method A), Groundwater Assessment (Method C), and Spillage Risk Assessment (Method D); Appendix 13.3 Hydrological Analysis and Hydraulic Assessment (Method E and F); Appendix 13.4 Baseline Data; Appendix 13.5 Environment Agency Flood Map; Appendix 13.6 Routine Runoff and Spillage Risk – Summary of Results; and Appendix 13.7 WFD Programme of Measures. Legislation and Planning Policy Legislation 13.3 The following lists European and National Legislation relevant to this study. More detail is provided in Appendix 13.1. European o Groundwater Directive (1980/68/EC) (to be repealed 2013)1; o Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC); o Groundwater Daughter Directive (2006/118/EC, replacing 1980/68/EC)); o Environmental Liability Directive (2004/35/EC); o Fish (Consolidated) Directive (2006/44EC, replacing 78/659/EC)1; o Nitrates Directive (91/676/EC) o Dangerous Substances Directive (76/464/EC)1 o Dangerous Substances Directive (2006/11/EC replacing 76/464/EC)1;and o Priority Substances Directive (2008/105/EC). National o The Environmental (England and Wales) Permitting Regulations 2010; o The Flood and Water Management Act 2010; o The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004; o The Water Act 2003; o The Water Resources Act 1991; o The Land Drainage Act 1991 (as amended); o Part IIA of The Environmental Protection Act 1990; o The Town and Country Planning Acts and Regulations (various dates). 1 To be repealed by the WFD when fully implemented AECOM A1-SENSLR: MNB – Environmental Impact Assessment – Volume 2: Environmental Statement 13-3 o The Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) Regulations 2003; o The Control of Pollution (Oil Storage) (England) Regulations 2001; o The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010; and o The Groundwater (Water Framework Directive) Direction 2006. Planning Policy 13.4 The Government’s water strategy for England, Future Water, was published in February 2008. This strategy sets out the Government’s long-term vision for water and the framework for water management in England. 13.5 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (March 2012) replaces existing national planning policy adopted since 2004 (e.g. Planning Policy Statement (PPS) 23 and PPS25). In particular, Section 11 Conserving and Enhancing the Natural Environment paragraph 109 states that development should be prevented from contributing or put at unacceptable risk from, or being adversely affected by unacceptable levels of water pollution. Section 10 Meeting the Challenge of Climate Change, Flooding and Coastal Change paragraphs 94 and 99 emphasise the need to adopt proactive strategies to mitigate and adapt to climate change over the long term, taking into account flood risk. 13.6 Local Planning Policy is set out by NCC using the former Castle Morpeth Local Plan, adopted in February 2003 as a guide for the time being. Policy RE4 Water Quality states that the Council will resist development which may adversely affect the quality of surface, underground or coastal water. Furthermore, any initiative to improve surface or coastal water quality will be encouraged. Policy RE5 Surface Water Run-Off and Flood Defences, prevents development in flood risk areas, or where development may increase the risk of flooding somewhere else, unless it falls into an exception category. In Castle Morpeth, however, because of geological conditions the safeguarding of ground water resources is not seen as an issue requiring formal policies, though the Council subscribes to the objective of the protection and efficient use of water supplies. In particular, water quality may be affected by emissions of water which has passed through old mine workings and been contaminated. Policy RE8 dealing with Contaminated Land is considered in Chapter 14 Geology and Soils. More detail on these policies is presented in Table 13.1.2 in Appendix 13.1. Methodology Scope of Assessment 13.7 This assessment has been carried out in accordance with guidance in Volume 11, Section 3, Part 10 of the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) (henceforth referred to as HD45/09). This assessment has identified the potential effects on the water environment by assessing the likely effects of the proposed scheme during construction and operation. The effects of the proposed scheme have been assessed, taking into consideration the magnitude of the effect and the importance of the receptor. 13.8 There are four assessments (HD45/09 assessment reference is denoted in brackets): Effects of routine runoff on surface waters (Methods A and B); AECOM A1-SENSLR: MNB – Environmental Impact Assessment – Volume 2: Environmental Statement 13-4 Effects of routine runoff on groundwater’s (Method C); Spillage Risk Assessment (Method D); and Flood Effects (Methods E and F). 13.9 For the purpose of the surface water (water quality and flood risk) the study area includes all features within approximately 1km of the site boundary. However, watercourse flow effects may propagate downstream, thus where relevant this study has also considered a wider study area (up to 2km downstream of the site boundary). In addition, since flood risk can affect upstream and downstream areas, this study has also considered a wider study area, where relevant. 13.10 Effects on groundwater may be local or regional in scale, depending on the size and duration of the imposed stresses and properties of the hydrogeological regime. For example, local effects may occur in permeable drift deposits by lowering of the water table, which may be temporary through construction dewatering, or permanent by land drainage. Regional effects associated with roads may include groundwater pollution as a result of diffuse pollution from surface water road drainage, discharged to soakaway, to bedrock over many kilometres of road. The area of interest for local or temporary effects is considered to be within 1km of the road, whereas regional effects may occur at the scale of the total catchment area for a public supply well or the entire aquifer. 13.11 Development parameters as defined in Table 2.3 of Chapter 2, and their relevance in this assessment, are presented in Table 13.1. AECOM A1-SENSLR: MNB – Environmental Impact Assessment – Volume 2: Environmental Statement 13-5 Table 13.1 Development Parameters Is the information important in the assessment of If so how was the information included in the assessment, and in Development Parameter ‘likely significant effects’? Why? what form? Yes, the extent of the red line boundary defines the All watercourses within the red line boundary have been identified and Red Line Boundary area in which watercourses may be affected by the assessed. The potential affect of pollution on watercourses considers a scheme. study area that extends beyond the red line. Not directly. The vertical road alignment influences Vertical Road Alignment Please refer to the footprint of earthworks below. the size of earthworks, which is relevant. Watercourses tend to flow north-south and the proposed route is aligned Horizontal Road Yes, the horizontal alignment influences the broadly east-west, thus irrespective of the horizontal alignment, the same Alignment watercourses that are crossed by the scheme. watercourses are crossed. These crossings have been assessed in this chapter. Yes, the size of the road is relevant as this influences The number of lanes is fixed. The area of carriageway and the volume of Number of carriageways the volume of runoff and amount of vehicle derived traffic it is predicted to carry are data inputs to the assessment of routine pollutants that it will contain. runoff. No, the location of roundabouts is not a relevant Location of roundabouts No further comment. consideration for this assessment. Area of development See comment for ‘red line boundary’ above. No further comment. This chapter considers a range of mitigation measures to manage earthworks to prevent significant adverse effects on the water The volume of earthworks is relevant to the environment. The main risk is where earthworks are in close proximity to Volume of earthworks assessment of construction effects on watercourses watercourses. The detail of these measures will be developed by the (i.e. from silt laden runoff). Contractor during detailed design. The assessment is precautionary and has assumed a worst case, and an appropriate range of measures has been proposed. Appropriate measures have been proposed to manage earthworks close This is relevant to the assessment where earthworks to watercourses. Site specific measures will be determined by the Footprint of earthworks are close to watercourses.
Recommended publications
  • 3.0 Project Pipeline
    3.0 Project Pipeline Following the workshop the project proposals were summarised into a pipeline. This was shared with all attendees for comments and further input and then reviewed by the North East LNP Natural Environment Group and other LNP representatives. The following summary provides an overview of project potential and likelihood of development. It is clear from this that there are potential landscape projects in the pipeline until 2019. Beyond this there is significant potential for further delivery, however the majority of these projects are currently at an outline stage and would require significant work to move towards delivery. This pipeline will be reviewed annually by the 3 North East LNPs to ensure that it remains a current overview of landscape delivery potential and allow partners to focus and align resources to ensure that there is the best approach taken to achieve delivery. It is anticipated that during this process, some projects will be discounted from the pipeline as delivery is unachievable whilst new ideas may be added as new opportunities are presented. Title Living Wild at Kielder Forest Source Existing project Lead Organisation Kielder Water and Forest Park Development Trust Estimated Size Geography Kielder Forest Project description Help people experience and learn about the area’s special animals and plants through the development of ‘nature hubs’ and a year-round events and activity programme. Partners Kielder Water and Forest Park Development Trust, Northumbrian Water, Forestry Commission , Northumberland Wildlife Trust, Environment Agency, Northumberland National Park Authority and Newcastle University. Timescale 2016- Estimated project £350,000 cost Funding sources HLF Identified need Outcomes Wildlife trails will be created from Stonehaugh, Falstone and Greenhaugh villages with support from the local community, while wildlife ambassadors and volunteers will inspire and engage with visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Newbiggin-By-The-Sea Character Appraisal
    Wansbeck District Council Regulatory Services Division Newbiggin-by-the-Sea Conservation Area (Existing & Proposed) Character Appraisal Produced by June 2008 www.wansbeck.gov.uk 2 June 2008 June Appraisal Character © Crown copyright. Alrightsreserved (DWAN003) 2007 (See page6forboundaryreview) Fig 1:Newbiggin-by-the-SeaConser Wansbeck District Council Newbiggin-by-the-Sea Conservation Area vation Area(ExistingandProposed) Front Street / High Street Church Point and Proposed Boundary Extension and Proposed Boundary Mean Low Water Mark Newbiggin Bay Gibson Street KEY: Existing conservation area boundary Proposed conservation area boundary Newbiggin-by-the-Sea Conservation Area Wansbeck District Council Contents 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................5 2 Location and Context.......................................................................................8 2.1 Location........................................................................................................8 2.2 Boundary and Proposed Extension..............................................................8 2.2.1 Existing Boundary................................................................................8 2.2.2 Proposed Boundary .............................................................................9 2.3 Context.......................................................................................................10 2.4 Views of and from the Area ........................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • THE RURAL ECONOMY of NORTH EAST of ENGLAND M Whitby Et Al
    THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND M Whitby et al Centre for Rural Economy Research Report THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST ENGLAND Martin Whitby, Alan Townsend1 Matthew Gorton and David Parsisson With additional contributions by Mike Coombes2, David Charles2 and Paul Benneworth2 Edited by Philip Lowe December 1999 1 Department of Geography, University of Durham 2 Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope of the Study 1 1.2 The Regional Context 3 1.3 The Shape of the Report 8 2. THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE REGION 2.1 Land 9 2.2 Water Resources 11 2.3 Environment and Heritage 11 3. THE RURAL WORKFORCE 3.1 Long Term Trends in Employment 13 3.2 Recent Employment Trends 15 3.3 The Pattern of Labour Supply 18 3.4 Aggregate Output per Head 23 4 SOCIAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL DYNAMICS 4.1 Distribution of Employment by Gender and Employment Status 25 4.2 Differential Trends in the Remoter Areas and the Coalfield Districts 28 4.3 Commuting Patterns in the North East 29 5 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE 5.1 Formation and Turnover of Firms 39 5.2 Inward investment 44 5.3 Business Development and Support 46 5.4 Developing infrastructure 49 5.5 Skills Gaps 53 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 55 References Appendices 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The scope of the study This report is on the rural economy of the North East of England1. It seeks to establish the major trends in rural employment and the pattern of labour supply.
    [Show full text]
  • [Geological Notes and Local Details for 1:10 000 Sheets] NZ17NE, SE and NZ18NE, SE
    Natural Environment Research Council BRITISHGEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY OF THE PONTELAND-MORPETHDISTRICT 1:10,000 sheets NZ 17 NE,SE and NZ 18 NE,SE Parts of 1:50,000 Sheets 9 (Rothbury) and 14 (Morpeth) D.J.D. Lawrence and I. Jackson Production of this report was supported by the Department of the Environment but the views expressed in it are not necessarily those of the Department Bibliographic reference LAWRENCE,D.J.D. and JACKSON, I. 1986. Geology of the Ponteland-Morpeth district. Research Report of the British Geological Survey. Authors D.J.D. Lawrence, BSc I. Jackson, BSc British Geological Survey Windsor Court Windsor Terrace Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HB CROWNCOPYRIGHT 1986 NEWCASTLEUPON TYNE BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1986 PREFACE Dataused in preparingthisreport and Thisaccount describes the geology ofthe associatedmaps islodged at theNewcastle Ponteland-Morpethdistrict covered by 1:10,000 uponTyne office theof British Geological sheets NZ17NE, SE and NZ18NE, SE whichlie Survey. enquiriesAny concerning these withinthe 1:50,000 geologicalsheets 9 documents should be directed to that office. (Rothbury)and 14 (Morpeth). The districtwas firstsurveyed at six-inchthe scale by Similarreports areavailable for 1:25,000 sheets H.H. Howelland W. Topley,and published on NZ15, NZ25, NZ26 and NZ27. NorthumberlandOldMeridian County maps duringthe years 1871 and 1879. Aresurvey by G.A. Burnett, V.A. Eylesand A. Fowlerbetween 1925 and 1949 waspublished onthe New Meridian. NOTES The present survey, whichwas commissioned AllNational Grid references in this report lie and financedtheDepartmentby theof withinthe 100 km square NZ. Gridreferences Environment,represents thesecond phase of a are given to eithereight figures (accurate to program m e of work in south-east in workprogramme of within 10m), or six figuresfor more extensive Northumberland.Its objectives are toprovide locations.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, September 1, 1893
    4990 THE LONDON GAZETTE, SEPTEMBER 1, 1893. with justice to all parties interested and we do from Choppington guide post to Sheepwash Bridge hereby submit the same to your Grace together as the same is more particularly delineated on the with the consents in writing of the said patrons plan hereto annexed and thereon coloured round and incumbents and in case you shall on full con- with a pink verge line. sideration and enquiry be satisfied therewith, we "PART III. request that your Grace will be pleased to certify " All that portion of the parish of Bedlington the same and the consents aforesaid by your in the county of Northumberland and diocese of report to Her Majesty in Council. Newcastle bounded on or towards the north partly " Given under our hand tbis first day of May, by a stream known as ' The Willow Burn' and in the year of our Lord one thousand eight partly by buildings known as ' The Choppington hundred and ninety-three. Cottages' and partly by the boundary of the " E. B. Newcastle." Willow Bridge Farm on or towards the east by And whereas the said scheme drawn up by the lands in the occupation of the Barringtou Colliery said Bishop, and the consents referred to in the Company on or towards the south by the Blyth said representation, are as follows :— and Tyne branch of the North Eastern Railway Company and on or towards the west partly by " The SCHEME. the boundary of the township of Hepscott and " 1. It is proposed to separate a certain district partly by the boundary of Puce Bush Farm which now part of the parish of Choppington in the said portion of the parish of Bedlington is more county of Northumberland and diocese of New- particularly delineated in the plan hereto annexed castle more particularly described in the first part and thereon coloured round with a blue verge line.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Students Taking AS/A-Level Geography at Latymer
    Information for students taking AS/A-level Geography at Latymer Thinking synoptically Preparing for an A-level in Geography shouldn’t be restricted to subscribing to the Geographical Association or Royal Geographical Society! The most successful Geographers are those that appreciate the subject for its synoptic qualities. Be mindful of the interconnectivity between different units of work in Geography, but also make use of the other subjects that you are studying. Don’t be afraid to bring into Geography lessons articles from The Economist or British Medical Journal, as well as regular snippets from Geography Review..! The following exercise gives you an opportunity to demonstrate your synoptic thinking skills whilst offering an insight into the level of work expected at A-level Geography. Task 1 Watch the BBC documentary 'Inside Out' (click here for YouTube link). Make notes on (a) examples of successful responses to the flood (b) examples of poor/lack of responses (c) socio-economic impacts of the flood (d) could more have been done to defend Morpeth? Task 2 Download the information booklet on flooding in Morpeth (See attached Documents) and print off the first seven pages. Construct an annotated diagram to explain how human and physical factors have contributed to flooding in Morpeth. Marks at A-level are award for annotating the arrows that link one box to another (avoid drawing a simple table of ‘human’ vs. ‘physical’ factors). Task 3 Looking back at the video clip and the information booklet, to what extent were human factors more important than physical factors in explaining why Morpeth was flooded? Discuss (250 words max.) You will be required to bring the completed tasks to show your teacher in the first Geography lesson.
    [Show full text]
  • MA Dissertatio
    Durham E-Theses Northumberland at War BROAD, WILLIAM,ERNEST How to cite: BROAD, WILLIAM,ERNEST (2016) Northumberland at War, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11494/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk ABSTRACT W.E.L. Broad: ‘Northumberland at War’. At the Battle of Towton in 1461 the Lancastrian forces of Henry VI were defeated by the Yorkist forces of Edward IV. However Henry VI, with his wife, son and a few knights, fled north and found sanctuary in Scotland, where, in exchange for the town of Berwick, the Scots granted them finance, housing and troops. Henry was therefore able to maintain a presence in Northumberland and his supporters were able to claim that he was in fact as well as in theory sovereign resident in Northumberland.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Visit River Wansbeck and Hart Burn, Northumberland 30Th
    Advisory Visit River Wansbeck and Hart Burn, Northumberland 30th March, 2010 1.0 Introduction This report is the output of a site visit undertaken by Tim Jacklin of the Wild Trout Trust to the Hart Burn and River Wansbeck, Northumberland on 30th March 2010. Comments in this report are based on observations on the day of the site visit and discussions with James Cookson (the landowner), Tim Stafford and Gareth Pedley (Environment Agency Fisheries Officer). Normal convention is applied throughout the report with respect to bank identification, i.e. the banks are designated left hand bank (LHB) or right hand bank (RHB) whilst looking downstream. 2.0 Catchment / Fishery Overview The River Wansbeck rises above Sweethope Lough on the edge of Forelaws Forest and runs through the towns of Morpeth and Ashington before discharging into the North Sea near Newbiggin-by-the-Sea. The Hart Burn is a tributary of the Wansbeck, flowing in a south-easterly direction from the Scot’s Gap area to the confluence near Meldon Park. During this visit, the river was inspected from the upstream limit on the Hart Burn down to the area downstream of Mill House Farm on the Wansbeck (Figure 1). These rivers flow through the Border Uplands Natural Area and more specifically the mid-Northumberland area, a plateau of undulating farmland which falls gradually towards the south underlain by sedimentary limestones, sandstones, siltstone rock and glacial till deposits (www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/jca12_tcm6-5248.pdf). The approximately 8-km section of river visited is owned by James Cookson and is very lightly fished.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast England – a History of Flash Flooding
    Northeast England – A history of flash flooding Introduction The main outcome of this review is a description of the extent of flooding during the major flash floods that have occurred over the period from the mid seventeenth century mainly from intense rainfall (many major storms with high totals but prolonged rainfall or thaw of melting snow have been omitted). This is presented as a flood chronicle with a summary description of each event. Sources of Information Descriptive information is contained in newspaper reports, diaries and further back in time, from Quarter Sessions bridge accounts and ecclesiastical records. The initial source for this study has been from Land of Singing Waters –Rivers and Great floods of Northumbria by the author of this chronology. This is supplemented by material from a card index set up during the research for Land of Singing Waters but which was not used in the book. The information in this book has in turn been taken from a variety of sources including newspaper accounts. A further search through newspaper records has been carried out using the British Newspaper Archive. This is a searchable archive with respect to key words where all occurrences of these words can be viewed. The search can be restricted by newspaper, by county, by region or for the whole of the UK. The search can also be restricted by decade, year and month. The full newspaper archive for northeast England has been searched year by year for occurrences of the words ‘flood’ and ‘thunder’. It was considered that occurrences of these words would identify any floods which might result from heavy rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Anticipated Acquisition by Arriva Northumbria Limited of the Bus Operations of Go North East Limited in Ashington, Northumberland
    Anticipated acquisition by Arriva Northumbria Limited of the bus operations of Go North East Limited in Ashington, Northumberland ME/4289/09 The OFT’s decision on reference under section 33(2)(a) given on 11 February 2010. Full text of decision published 26 May 2010. Please note that the square brackets indicate figures or text which have been deleted or replaced in ranges at the request of the parties or third parties for reasons of commercial confidentiality. PARTIES 1. Arriva Northumbria Limited (ANL) operates commercial and tendered local bus services in the North East of England. ANL is controlled by Arriva plc (Arriva), one of the five largest bus and train operators in the UK. 2. The target comprises the local bus business that Go North East Limited (GNE) operates mostly out of its depot in Ashington, in Northumberland, which is north east of Newcastle (the GNE Ashington assets). GNE is controlled by the Go-Ahead Group plc (Go-Ahead), another of the five largest bus and train operators in the UK. TRANSACTION 3. ANL intends to acquire the GNE Ashington assets which include: 25 buses; 17 commercial and tendered services;1,2 staff; some residual stock at GNE's Ashington depot; and a six month rent-free licence for the use of Go-Ahead's Ashington depot. The bus services comprise three routes into 1 Services number 30C, 32, 32B, X41, X42, X43, X44, X45, 144, 308, 322, 419, 438, 445, 873, 562 and 563. Most of these routes are either partially or totally subsidised. The OFT understand that at most four routes are entirely commercial.
    [Show full text]
  • Northumberland County Council Notice of Poll
    NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ELECTION OF COUNTY COUNCILLOR(S) ALNWICK COUNTY DIVISION NOTICE OF POLL Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of COUNTY COUNCILLORS for the COUNTY DIVISION of ALNWICK will be held on THURSDAY 4 MAY 2017, between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM 2. The Number of COUNTY COUNCILLORS to be elected is TWO 3. The names, addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated and the names of all the persons signing the Candidates nomination papers are as follows: Name of Candidate Address Description Names of Persons who have signed the Nomination Paper Lydia Heather Vicarage Liberal Democrats Kenneth Gray Maureen Fortune CAIRNS Ellingham Clare M Mills John C Ash Chathill Philip D Angier Philip J Turner NE67 5EX Elizabeth Angier Susan M Frater Margaret R Dobbie Molly Cooper Gordon 18 Blakelaw Road Conservative Party Peter J Hately Daniel W Robinson CASTLE Alnwick Candidate Claire Christie Rachael S Fraser Northumberland Thomas N Bloom David Ge Taylor NE66 1AZ George A Dourish Gordon T Castle Diane I Dourish Elizabeth Castle Andrew Eoin The Coach House Liberal Democrats Kenneth Gray Maureen Fortune DUFF 20a Bondgate Clare M Mills John C Ash Within Philip D Angier Philip J Turner Alnwick Elizabeth Angier Susan M Frater NE66 1TD Margaret R Dobbie Molly Cooper Bill 1 Hope Terrace Labour Party Henry P Gormally Karina J Biggers GRISDALE Alnwick Susan L Patience John M Hobrough Northumberland Peter D Ballan Samantha M Hobrough NE66 1AJ Veronica B Ballan Lynn Welch Peter D Biggers Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Multi Let Industrial Investment & Land for Sale
    Multi Let Industrial Investment & Land For Sale 13 Castle Island Way, Ashington, Northumberland, NE63 0XL A L N W I C K | D U R H A M | G O S F O R T H | M O R P E T H | N E W C A S T L E | SUNDERLAND INVESTMENT SUMMARY DESCRIPTION • Three industrial units with adjacent land The subject property comprises three industrial units which form a terrace. Each of the units benefit • Total size of 605.9m² (6,522ft²) from roller shutter door access and an open external yard area which is partly utilised for parking. The units were constructed in 2012 and are of brick construction to the bottom portion with a steel • Additional land comprising approx. 0.226 acres roof and top portion. • May be suitable for development STPP • Current passing rent of £25,600 per annum. There is also additional hardstanding land adjacent to the site with perimeter palisade fencing, • We are instructed to seek offers in excess of £325,000 equating to which may be suitable for development subject to planning permission. a net initial yield of 7.61% assuming purchasers costs at 3.47%. • Based on an ERV of £31,200 per annum, this would reflect a ACCOMMODATION 13a Castle Island Way 198.9m² 2,141ft² reversionary yield of 9.27%. 13b Castle Island Way 198.9m² 2,141ft² 13c Castle Island Way 208.1m² 2,240ft² LOCATION Total 605.9m² 6,522ft² The subject properties are located on Castle Island Way in North Seaton, External yard 0.226 acres 9,786ft² Ashington.
    [Show full text]