Greater Soutpansberg Mopane Project Scoping

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Greater Soutpansberg Mopane Project Scoping GREATER SOUTPANSBERG MOPANE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME DMR References: LP 30/5/1/2/2/10029 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10030 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10031 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10032 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10033 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10034 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10035 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10036 MR NOVEMBER 2013 GREATER SOUTPANSBERG MOPANE PROJECT SECTION 1 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME REGULATION 50 PROJECT DETAILS Name of Project Greater Soutpansberg - Mopane Project DMR Reference Numbers LP 30/5/1/2/2/10029 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10030 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10031 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10032 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10033 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10034 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10035 MR LP 30/5/1/2/2/10036 MR Name of Applicant LP 30/5/1/2/2/10029 MR Regulus Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd LP 30/5/1/2/2/10030 MR Kwezi Mining Exploration (Pty) Ltd LP 30/5/1/2/2/10031 MR Kwezi Mining Exploration (Pty) Ltd LP 30/5/1/2/2/10032 MR Chapudi Coal (Pty) Ltd LP 30/5/1/2/2/10033 MR Coal of Africa Limited LP 30/5/1/2/2/10034 MR Coal of Africa Limited LP 30/5/1/2/2/10035 MR Kwezi Mining Exploration (Pty) Ltd LP 30/5/1/2/2/10036 MR Kwezi Mining Exploration (Pty) Ltd Responsible person Baldwin Khosa Designation Regulatory Affairs Manager Physical address The Campus, Gabba Building (2nd floor) 57 Sloane Street, Bryanston Postal Address PO Box 69517, Bryanston, 2021 Telephone 011 575 4363 Facsimile 086 562 1335 E-mail [email protected] i | P a g e Environmental Consultant Jacana Environmentals cc Responsible person Marietjie Eksteen Physical address 7 Landdros Mare Street, Polokwane Postal Address PO Box 31675, Superbia, 0759 Telephone (015) 291 4015 Facsimile (015) 291 5035 E-mail [email protected] Public Participation Consultant Naledi Development Restructured (Pty) Ltd Responsible person Lizinda Dickson Physical address 143 Zambezi Avenue, Sinoville Postal Address PO Box 13509, Sinoville, 0129 Telephone (012) 543 9093 Facsimile (012) 543 9619 E-mail [email protected] Impact specialist consultants Soils, land use and capability Gudani Consulting - EcoSoil Consortium Surface and Groundwater WSM Leshika Consulting (Pty) Ltd Biodiversity Phaki Phakanani Environmental Consultants Aquatic systems Scientific Aquatic Services Noise Gudani Consulting Air Quality Royal Haskoning DHV Heritage Resources Mbofho Consulting and Projects Socio-Economic Naledi Development Restructured (Pty) Ltd Macro-Economic Mosaka Economic Consultants cc ii | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENT 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE BASELINE ENVIRONMENT ................................................ 1 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Surface Ownership ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1.2 COMMUNITIES ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1.3 Land Claimants / Traditional Authority ................................................................................................. 5 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE BIOPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................... 11 1.2.1 Climatic Data ........................................................................................................................................ 11 1.2.1.1 Regional Climate .................................................................................................................................. 11 1.2.1.2 Temperature ........................................................................................................................................ 11 1.2.1.3 Winds ................................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.1.4 Mean Annual Precipitation and Mean Monthly Rainfall ..................................................................... 16 1.2.1.5 Run-off and Evaporation ...................................................................................................................... 18 1.2.2 Soils ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 1.2.2.1 Parent Material .................................................................................................................................... 21 1.2.2.2 Land Types ........................................................................................................................................... 22 1.2.2.3 Soil Forms ............................................................................................................................................ 24 1.2.2.3.1 Red apedal soils .......................................................................................................................... 24 1.2.2.3.2 Yellow-brown apedal soils .......................................................................................................... 25 1.2.2.3.3 Neocutanic soils .......................................................................................................................... 25 1.2.2.3.4 Carbonate soils ........................................................................................................................... 25 1.2.2.3.5 Neocarbonate soils ..................................................................................................................... 25 1.2.2.3.6 Pedocutanic soils ........................................................................................................................ 25 1.2.2.3.7 Shallow rocky soils ...................................................................................................................... 26 1.2.2.3.8 Fernwood soils ........................................................................................................................... 26 1.2.3 Pre-Mining Land Capability .................................................................................................................. 28 1.2.4 Present Land Use ................................................................................................................................. 31 1.2.5 Biodiversity (Flora and Fauna) ............................................................................................................. 33 1.2.5.1 Flora ..................................................................................................................................................... 33 1.2.5.1.1 Biome ......................................................................................................................................... 33 1.2.5.1.2 Veld types ................................................................................................................................... 34 1.2.5.1.3 Vegetation communities and sensitivity mapping ..................................................................... 36 1.2.5.1.4 Protected and endemic flora ...................................................................................................... 38 1.2.5.1.5 Introduced or exotic/alien plants ............................................................................................... 40 1.2.5.2 Fauna ................................................................................................................................................... 43 1.2.5.2.1 Mammals .................................................................................................................................... 43 1.2.5.2.2 Avifauna ...................................................................................................................................... 43 1.2.5.2.3 Reptiles ....................................................................................................................................... 45 1.2.5.2.4 Amphibians ................................................................................................................................. 46 1.2.5.2.5 Invertebrates .............................................................................................................................. 47 1.2.5.2.6 Faunal sensitive areas ................................................................................................................ 52 1.2.5.3 Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes ................................................................................................ 53 1.2.5.3.1 National Biodiversity Assessment (NBA, 2011) .......................................................................... 53 1.2.5.3.2 Biodiversity Proxy ....................................................................................................................... 53 1.2.5.4 Ecosystem Services .............................................................................................................................. 53 iii | P a g e 1.2.6 Aquatic environment ........................................................................................................................... 57 1.2.6.1 Ecoregions ........................................................................................................................................... 57 1.2.6.2 Ecostatus .............................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A Review of the Species of Psammophis Boie Found South of Latitude 12° S (Serpentes: Psammophiinae)
    African Journal of Herpetology, 2002 51(2): 83-119. Original article A review of the species of Psammophis Boie found south of Latitude 12° S (Serpentes: Psammophiinae) DONALD G. BROADLEY Research Associate, Natural History Museum of Zimbabwe, Bulawayo Present address: Biodiversity Foundation for Africa,P.O. Box FM 730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe [email protected] Abstract.—The status, relationships and zoogeography of the 14 taxa of Psammophis found south of Latitude 12° S are reviewed and the following taxonomic changes are proposed: 1. Psammophis trinasalis and P. namibensis, previously treated as subspecies of P. leightoni, are recognised as good evolutionary species which show ecological differences. 2. Psammophis orientalis, previously regarded as a subspecies of P. subtaeniatus, differs from the lat- ter in a suite of characters and is parapatric with it in Zimbabwe, so it is now recognised as an evolu- tionary species. 3. Psammophis brevirostris and P. leopardinus, previously regarded as subspecies of P. sibilans (Linnaeus), are recognised as relict evolutionary species. The Zambian populations previously assigned to P. leopardinus have been described as a new species (Hughes & Wade, in press). Key words.—Psammophis, morphology, taxonomy, zoogeography, southern Africa ince the last review of the genus mossambicus has subsequently been applied to SPsammophis in southern Africa (Broadley this eastern sister taxon of P. phillipsii 1977), a revision of the whole genus was the (Hallowell) by Branch (1998) and Hughes subject of a thesis by Frank Brandstätter (1999). (1995), which was subsequently published in summary form (Brandstätter 1996). The result- ing confusion with regard to the northern forms MATERIALS AND METHODS of the P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Olifants River Area, Transvaal
    REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VANSUID-AFRIKA· DEPARTMENT OF MINES DEPARTEMENT VAN MYNWESE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIESE OPNAME THE GEOLOGY OF THE OLIFANTS RIVER AREA, TRANSVAAL AN EXPLANATION OF SHEETS 2429B (CHUNIESPOORT) AND 2430A (WOLKBERG) by J. S. I. Sehwellnus, D.Se., L. N. J. Engelbrecht, B.Sc., F. J. Coertze, B.Sc. (Hons.), H. D. Russell, B.Sc., S. J. Malherbe, B.Sc. (Hons.), D. P. van Rooyen, B.Sc., and R. Cooke, B.Sc. Met 'n opsomming in Afrikaans onder die opskrif: DIE GEOLOGIE VAN DIE GEBIED OLIFANTSRIVIER, TRANSVAAL COPYRIGHT RESERVED/KOPIEREG VOORBEHOU (1962) Printed by and obtainable (rom Gedruk deur en verkrygbaar the Government Printer, B(ls~ van die Staatsdrukker, Bosman­ man Street, Pretoria. straat, Pretoria. Geological map in colour on a Geologiese kaart in kleur op 'n scale of I: 125,000 obtainable skaal van I: 125.000 apart ver­ separately at the price of 60c. krygbaar teen die prys van 60c. & .r.::-~ h'd'~, '!!~l p,'-' r\ f: ~ . ~) t,~ i"'-, i CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT ........................ ' ••• no ..........' ........" ... • • • • • • • • •• 1 I. INTRODUCTION........ •.••••••••.••••••••.....••...•.•..••••..• 3 II. PHYSIOGRAPHY................................................ 4 A. ToPOGRAPHY..... • • . • • . • . • • . • • • . • • . • . • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • ... 4 B. DRAINAGE.................................................... 6 C. CLIMATE ..........•.••••.•••••.••....................... ,.... 7 D. VEGETATION .••••.•••••.•.........•..... , ..............•... , . 7 III. GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Major Vegetation Types of the Soutpansberg Conservancy and the Blouberg Nature Reserve
    Chapter 4 Major Vegetation Types of the Soutpansberg Conservancy and the Blouberg Nature Reserve (Research paper submitted for publication in Koedoe) 25 Major Vegetation Types of the Soutpansberg Conservancy and the Blouberg Nature Reserve T.H.C. Mostert1, G.J. Bredenkamp1, H.L. Klopper1, C. Verwey1, R.E. Mostert2 and N. Hahn3 1. African Vegetation and Plant Diversity Research Centre, Department of Botany, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002. 2. South African Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001. 3. Herbarium Soutpansbergensis, P.O. Box 1734, Makhado, 0920. Abstract The Major Vegetation Types and plant communities of the Soutpansberg Centre of Endemism are described in detail with special reference to the Soutpansberg Conservancy and the Blouberg Nature Reserve. Phytosociological data from 466 sample plots were ordinated using a Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DECORANA) and classified using Two–way Indicator Species Analysis (TWINSPAN). The resulting classification was further refined with table–sorting procedures based on the Braun–Blanquet floristic–sociological approach of vegetation classification using MEGATAB. Eight Major Vegetation Types were identified and described as Eragrostis lehmanniana var. lehmanniana–Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra BNR Northern Plains Bushveld, Euclea divinorum–Acacia tortilis BNR Southern Plains Bushveld, Englerophytum magalismontanum–Combretum molle BNR Mountain Bushveld, Adansonia digitata–Acacia nigrescens Soutpansberg Arid Northern Bushveld, Catha edulis–Flueggia virosa Soutpansberg Moist Mountain Thickets, Diplorhynchus condylocarpon–Burkea africana Soutpansberg Leached Sandveld, Rhus rigida var. rigida–Rhus magalismontanum subsp. coddii Soutpansberg Mistbelt Vegetation and Xymalos monospora–Rhus chirendensis Soutpansberg Forest Vegetation. 26 Introduction The Soutpansberg Conservancy (SC) and the Blouberg Nature Reserve (BNR) reveal extremely rich diversities of plant communities relative to the sizes of these conservation areas (Van Wyk & Smith 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Major Vegetation Types of the Soutpansberg Conservancy and the Blouberg Nature Reserve, South Africa
    Original Research MAJOR VEGETATION TYPES OF THE SOUTPANSBERG CONSERVANCY AND THE BLOUBERG NATURE RESERVE, SOUTH AFRICA THEO H.C. MOSTERT GEORGE J. BREDENKAMP HANNES L. KLOPPER CORNIE VERWEy 1African Vegetation and Plant Diversity Research Centre Department of Botany University of Pretoria South Africa RACHEL E. MOSTERT Directorate Nature Conservation Gauteng Department of Agriculture Conservation and Environment South Africa NORBERT HAHN1 Correspondence to: Theo Mostert e-mail: [email protected] Postal Address: African Vegetation and Plant Diversity Research Centre, Department of Botany, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002 ABSTRACT The Major Megetation Types (MVT) and plant communities of the Soutpansberg Centre of Endemism are described in detail, with special reference to the Soutpansberg Conservancy and the Blouberg Nature Reserve. Phytosociological data from 442 sample plots were ordinated using a DEtrended CORrespondence ANAlysis (DECORANA) and classified using TWo-Way INdicator SPecies ANalysis (TWINSPAN). The resulting classification was further refined with table-sorting procedures based on the Braun–Blanquet floristic–sociological approach of vegetation classification using MEGATAB. Eight MVT’s were identified and described asEragrostis lehmanniana var. lehmanniana–Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra Blouberg Northern Plains Bushveld, Euclea divinorum–Acacia tortilis Blouberg Southern Plains Bushveld, Englerophytum magalismontanum–Combretum molle Blouberg Mountain Bushveld, Adansonia digitata–Acacia nigrescens Soutpansberg
    [Show full text]
  • Early History of South Africa
    THE EARLY HISTORY OF SOUTH AFRICA EVOLUTION OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES . .3 SOUTH AFRICA: THE EARLY INHABITANTS . .5 THE KHOISAN . .6 The San (Bushmen) . .6 The Khoikhoi (Hottentots) . .8 BLACK SETTLEMENT . .9 THE NGUNI . .9 The Xhosa . .10 The Zulu . .11 The Ndebele . .12 The Swazi . .13 THE SOTHO . .13 The Western Sotho . .14 The Southern Sotho . .14 The Northern Sotho (Bapedi) . .14 THE VENDA . .15 THE MASHANGANA-TSONGA . .15 THE MFECANE/DIFAQANE (Total war) Dingiswayo . .16 Shaka . .16 Dingane . .18 Mzilikazi . .19 Soshangane . .20 Mmantatise . .21 Sikonyela . .21 Moshweshwe . .22 Consequences of the Mfecane/Difaqane . .23 Page 1 EUROPEAN INTERESTS The Portuguese . .24 The British . .24 The Dutch . .25 The French . .25 THE SLAVES . .22 THE TREKBOERS (MIGRATING FARMERS) . .27 EUROPEAN OCCUPATIONS OF THE CAPE British Occupation (1795 - 1803) . .29 Batavian rule 1803 - 1806 . .29 Second British Occupation: 1806 . .31 British Governors . .32 Slagtersnek Rebellion . .32 The British Settlers 1820 . .32 THE GREAT TREK Causes of the Great Trek . .34 Different Trek groups . .35 Trichardt and Van Rensburg . .35 Andries Hendrik Potgieter . .35 Gerrit Maritz . .36 Piet Retief . .36 Piet Uys . .36 Voortrekkers in Zululand and Natal . .37 Voortrekker settlement in the Transvaal . .38 Voortrekker settlement in the Orange Free State . .39 THE DISCOVERY OF DIAMONDS AND GOLD . .41 Page 2 EVOLUTION OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES Humankind had its earliest origins in Africa The introduction of iron changed the African and the story of life in South Africa has continent irrevocably and was a large step proven to be a micro-study of life on the forwards in the development of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Eskom Holdings SOC Limited
    Eskom Holdings SOC Limited Environmen tal Impact Assessment for the Proposed 1x40 0kV Tabor-Bokmakirie (Nzhelele) and 4 X 250MVA 400kV/132kV Nzhelele Mai n Transmission Station, Limpopo Province SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT DEA EIA Reference Number: 14/12/16/3/3/2/317 NEAS Ref Number: DEA/EIA/0001132/2012 LDEDET Ref Number: 12/1/9/E-V178 Date: February 2013 Report Version: Draft 1 Lidwala Consulting Engineers (SA) (Pty) Ltd Randburg Office: Pretoria Office: 11th Church Avenue, Ruiterhof, Randburg, 2194, 1121 Hertzog Street, Office F005, Waverley, Pretoria, 0186, PO Box 4221, Northcliff, 2115. PO Box 32497, Waverley, Pretoria, 0135, Tel: 0861 543 9252 Tel/faxs: 0861 543 9252 Polokwane Office : Nelspruit Office: 128 Marshall Street, Amy Park no. 5, Polokwane 39 Emkhe Street, Nelpruit, 1200 PO Box 3558, Polokwane, 0700 PO Box 2930, Nelspruit, 1200 Tel: 0861 543 9252 Tel: 0861 543 9252 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 5 1.1. Methodology 5 2. Social impacts expected during all project stages: 5 3. Description of the socio-economic setting – demographic information regarding the area in which the proposed line will be constructed: 6 3.1 Demographic profiles 7 3.2 Economic activities, Tourism and farming: 9 3.2.2 Tourism 9 3.2.3 Farming in the MLM 10 3.3 Employment rates and livelihoods 12 3.4 Access to services 12 3.4.1 Electricity 12 3.4.2. Access to water and sanitation facilities 13 3.4.3 Waste management 14 3.4.4 Transport 14 3.4.5 Educational facilities and libraries 14 3.4.6 Health facilities 15 3.4.7 Telecommunication and Postal Services 15 3.5 Conclusions from the social and economic environment within which the new power line is planned 16 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Inventory of the Maremani Nature Reserve
    Geological Inventory Of The Maremani Nature Reserve Professor Jay Barton Department of Geology, Rand Afrikaans University (RAU) P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa Telephone: 27-11-489-2304 FAX: 27-11-489-2309 E-mail: [email protected] Introduction The Maremani Nature Reserve is presently being established and this document is intended as a summary of aspects of the geology within the boundaries of the Reserve. I have taken the liberty also to express my opinions with regard to possible roles that the Reserve might fulfill with regard to promoting geological awareness, education and research. The geology of the area covered by the Reserve was mapped in 1976 by Gunther Brandl and W. O. Willoughby of the Geological Survey of South Africa (presently the Council For Geo- science) at a scale of 1:50 000 for compilation at a scale of 1:250 000 (Brandl, 1981). The western portion to 30o 15’ east was previously mapped at a scale of 1:10 000 for compilation at scales of 1:50 000 and 1:125 000 by P. G. Söhnge (1946; Söhnge et al., 1948). Also locally within the western portion of the Reserve, maps at the scale of 1:5 000 were compiled by Messina Transvaal Development Corporation on farms and prospects investigated by the staff of the Messina Copper Mine. These maps are presently archived with me at RAU. Peter Horrocks wrote a PhD thesis on the geology of part of the western portion of what is now the Reserve (Horrocks, 1981). Charles Guerin in the late 1970’s worked on an unfin- ished MSc thesis on the calc-silicate rocks exposed in an area south of that studied by Peter Horrocks, some of which occur within the Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • HYDROGEOLOGY of GROUNDWATER REGION 7 POLOKWANE/PIETERSBURG PLATEAU JR Vegter
    HYDROGEOLOGY OF GROUNDWATER REGION 7 POLOKWANE/PIETERSBURG PLATEAU Prepared for the Water Research Commission by JR Vegter Hydrogeological Consultant WRC Report No. TT 209/03 October 2003 Obtainable from: Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 GEZINA 0031 Pretoria The publication of this report emanates from a project entitled: Hydrogeology of groundwater region 7 Pietersburg Plateau (WRC Consultancy No. K8/466) DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ISBN No. 1-77005-027-2 ISBN Set No. 1-86845-645-5 Printed in the Republic of South Africa EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The more important findings of this study are summarised below under “Statistical analyses”, “Role of geophysical methods” and “Hydrogeological control of drilling operations” General Groundwater Region 7, a rectangular area of about 12 000 km2, is located in the Limpopo Province. Its eastern boundary is the watershed between the Sand River and its tributaries and the eastward draining Letaba and Pafuri Rivers. Its northern boundary is formed by Formations of the Soutpansberg Group that built the mountain range of that name. The western boundary consists from north to south firstly of Waterberg Group sedimentary rocks, followed by mafic Bushveld rocks and lastly by strata of the Wolkberg Group including the Black Reef Formation. These strata build the Highlands Mountains and the east- northeasterly trending Strydpoort Mountains that form the southern boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Origins of Cyanobacteria at Musina Water Treatment Plant Using Dna Fingerprints
    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ORIGINS OF CYANOBACTERIA AT MUSINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT USING DNA FINGERPRINTS Murendeni Magonono (11573449) Supervisor: Prof JR Gumbo Co-supervisor: Prof PJ Oberholster A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Ecology & Resources Management, University of Venda, for the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Earth Sciences in Hydrology & Water Resources August 2017 i DECLARATION ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate my thesis to my parents Mr A.N Ma gonono and Mrs A.S Magonono who supported me throughout my studies. This thesis is also dedicated to all other people who helped in the success of this project. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Prof Gumbo for the continuous support and influence he showed during this Master’s program. It will never be enough by words to show how much I appreciate his efforts; he was involved in sponsorship attraction, progress and supply of knowledge to the author without giving up. I would also like to thank everyone for the laboratory assistan ce as well as Prof Shonai and Prof Gitari for allowing me the access to their laborat ies. I would also take this moment to thank Dr Gachara, Mr Glen Mr B Ogola and Mr S Makumere for their energy and time used in analyzing my results, and the influence they gave to me without giving up. I would like to also give a thank you to Mr E Matamba who spent his time reanalyzing my results and reading my thesis, his influence is very much appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • National Water Resource Strategy First Edition, September 2004 ______
    National Water Resource Strategy First Edition, September 2004 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ FOREWORD The National Water Policy (1997) and the National Water Act (1998) are founded on Government’s vision of a transformed society in South Africa, in which every person has the opportunity to lead a dignified and healthy life and to participate in productive economic activity. The First Edition of the National Water Resource Strategy (NWRS) describes how the water resources of South Africa will be protected, used, developed, conserved, managed and controlled in accordance with the requirements of the policy and law. The central objective of managing water resources is to ensure that water is used to support equitable and sustainable social and economic transformation and development. Because water is essential for human life the first priority is to ensure that water resources management supports the provision of water services - potable water and safe sanitation - to all people, but especially to the poor and previously disadvantaged. But water can do much more than that: water can enable people to make a living. The NWRS seeks to identify opportunities where water can be made available for productive livelihoods, and also the support and assistance needed to use the water effectively. Water is of course central to all economic activity. The NWRS provides a platform for the essential collaboration and co-operation among all departments in all spheres of government involved in economic development. It is an important input to the evolving National Spatial Development Framework, helping to provide a better understanding of the contribution that water can make to development in all departments’ areas of activity.
    [Show full text]
  • African Butterfly News, All Came from the ABRI Collection in Nairobi
    SEPTEMBER 2019 EDITION: AFRICAN ABN 2019 - 5 (JULY AND AUGUST 2019) BUTTERFLY THE LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA NEWS LATEST NEWS Welcome to September’s newsletter! A reminder that this year’s LepSoc Africa Conference will be held in Knysna on Sat 16 and Sun 17 November. Please contact Dave Edge ([email protected]) to confirm your attendance. For those of you looking for accommodation in Knysna, Dave forwarded the flowing link: Places to stay in Knysna We have found, at recent LepSoc Africa Conferences, that presentation of the annual reports of various LSA officers takes up most, if not all, of the three-hours that have traditionally been allocated to the Annual General Meeting. At last year’s conference in Hermannsburg, there was dissatisfaction about the time available for general discussion among members present at the meeting. This year, we are going to do it differently! Using the approach that has been adopted by the Entomological Society of Southern Africa (Entsocsa), the reports of office bearers will be circulated to the entire LepSoc Africa membership at least two weeks before the AGM. At the AGM, a condensed summary of the various reports will be presented for ratification, following which there will be a brief discussion. Significant issues, that require resolution at the AGM, should be raised by LSA members prior to the meeting and the salient points submitted for discussion under Matters Arising. Missing Links… A few people pointed out that a couple of the links in July’s newsletter didn’t work. I’ve corrected this below: Colotis ungemachi Arnold Schultze Steve Collins noted that, in July’s newsletter, I’d correctly captioned a photo from Sudheer Kommana as Baliochila hildegarda, but that this species is not found in Ghana as I’d indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Flat Mite (Brevipalpus Acadiae Ryke & Meyer, Tenuipalpidae, Acarina): Doringboomplatmyt
    Creepie-crawlies and such comprising: Common Names of Insects 1963, indicated as CNI Butterfly List 1959, indicated as BL Some names the sources of which are unknown, and indicated as such Gewone Insekname SKOENLAPPERLYS INSLUITENDE BOSLUISE, MYTE, SAAMGESTEL DEUR DIE AALWURMS EN SPINNEKOPPE LANDBOUTAALKOMITEE Saamgestel deur die MET MEDEWERKING VAN NAVORSINGSINSTITUUT VIR DIE PLANTBESKERMING TAALDIENSBURO Departement van Landbou-tegniese Dienste VAN DIE met medewerking van die DEPARTEMENT VAN ONDERWYS, KUNS EN LANDBOUTAALKOMITEE WETENSKAP van die Taaldiensburo 1959 1963 BUTTERFLY LIST Common Names of Insects COMPILED BY THE INCLUDING TICKS, MITES, EELWORMS AGRICULTURAL TERMINOLOGY AND SPIDERS COMMITTEE Compiled by the IN COLLABORATION WiTH PLANT PROTECTION RESEARCH THE INSTITUTE LANGUAGE SERVICES BUREAU Department of Agricultural Technical Services OF THE in collaboration with the DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ARTS AND AGRICULTURAL TERMINOLOGY SCIENCE COMMITTEE DIE STAATSDRUKKER + PRETORIA + THE of the Language Service Bureau GOVERNMENT PRINTER 1963 1959 Rekenaarmatig en leksikografies herverwerk deur PJ Taljaard e-mail enquiries: [email protected] EXPLANATORY NOTES 1 The list was alphabetised electronically. 2 On the target-language side, ie to the right of the :, synonyms are separated by a comma, e.g.: fission: klowing, splyting The sequence of the translated terms does NOT indicate any preference. Preferred terms are underlined. 3 Where catchwords of similar form are used as different parts of speech and confusion may therefore
    [Show full text]