Kosuda, K. Viability of Drosophila Melanogaster Female Flies Carrying Melanotic Tumours
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Drosophila Information Service Number 102 December 2019 Prepared at the Department of Biology University of Oklahoma Norman, OK 73019 U.S.A. ii Dros. Inf. Serv. 102 (2019) Preface Drosophila Information Service (often called “DIS” by those in the field) was first printed in March, 1934. For those first issues, material contributed by Drosophila workers was arranged by C.B. Bridges and M. Demerec. As noted in its preface, which is reprinted in Dros. Inf. Serv. 75 (1994), Drosophila Information Service was undertaken because, “An appreciable share of credit for the fine accomplishments in Drosophila genetics is due to the broadmindedness of the original Drosophila workers who established the policy of a free exchange of material and information among all actively interested in Drosophila research. This policy has proved to be a great stimulus for the use of Drosophila material in genetic research and is directly responsible for many important contributions.” Since that first issue, DIS has continued to promote open communication. The production of this volume of DIS could not have been completed without the generous efforts of many people. Except for the special issues that contained mutant and stock information now provided in detail by FlyBase and similar material in the annual volumes, all issues are now freely-accessible from our web site: www.ou.edu/journals/dis. For early issues that only exist as aging typed or mimeographed copies, some notes and announcements have not yet been fully brought on line. But we intend to fill in those gaps for historical purposes in the future. If you would pdf copies of material missing from the on-line issues, please contact Jim Thompson. We continue to encourage all researchers to consider submitting articles that use Drosophila for teaching as well as articles that report new techniques, research results, and interesting new mutations. In the interests of honoring the long-standing philosophy of open exchange of ideas, we sometimes accept articles that have unusual or limited perspectives. We thank the many contributors from around the world who sent material for this issue, and we invite your submissions for future annual issues as well as any suggestions you have for maintaining this as a useful Drosophila research community resource. James N. Thompson, jr., Editor David Ross Boyd Professor of Biology Department of Biology University of Oklahoma, Norman Jenna J. Hellack, Associate Editor Department of Biology, Emeritus University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond Department of Biology, Adjunct Professor University of Oklahoma, Norman Contributions and Inquiries should be sent to: James N. Thompson, jr., Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019; Phone: (405) 325-2001, FAX (405) 325-6202, email: [email protected] Printed copies of some recent volumes can be ordered from lulu.com. Dros. Inf. Serv. 102 (2019) iii List of Contributions General Announcements Guide to Authors 78 Printed copies of Drosophila Information Service from lulu.com 82 Historical Perspective Kass, L.B. It’s the reason they call it a Memoir: H.J. Muller (1890-1967), Records and Recollections 93 Research Notes Del Pino, F., J. Arriagada, P. Espinoza, F. Gonzalez, C. Pozo, M. Zamora, and E. Alvarez. Reversion of the negative effects of social isolation on morphological, physiological, and conductual development in Drosophila melanogaster larvae. 53 Goldstein, S., R. Sohn, B. Possidente, and J.A. Seggio. Circadian activity rhythms in mutant strains for alcohol dehydrogenase Fast, Slow, and Null alleles. 21 Gupta, A.P. Experimental revelation on the Total Phenotypic Variance Equation based on the Reaction Norm Curve using Drosophila pseudoobscura. 22 Gupta, A.P., and A.A. Felton. Egg density effect on individual reaction norm of genotype in Drosophila pseudoobscura population from Strawberry Canyon, California. 15 Hasan, A., and B.E. Staveley. Altered expression of Rbf in the Drosophila eye alleviates the characteristic foxo phenotype. 65 Hegge, M., H. Hansen, A. Akyatan, L. Ophel, G. Edelstein, and B. Possidente. Skeleton photoperiods shed light on sex-differences in Drosophila circadian activity patterns in wild-type and radish mutant strains. 68 Jain, D., and S. Mohanty. Constraints in pupation site selection: insight from Drosophila. 74 Kizilet, H., and H. Uysal. Induced somatic mutation during chronic exposure of chlorfenson on Drosophila melanogaster Oregon R (wild type). 4 Li, M., S. Wilensky, and B. Possidente. Lithium and caffeine interact to alter circadian activity rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster. 1 iv Dros. Inf. Serv. 102 (2019) Mendes, M.F., D.R. Machado, F.R.M. Garcia, M.L. Blauth, and M.S. Gottschalk. The use of the trophic resource by exotic and native species Drosophilidae: fruit colonization on the plant. 18 Nasir, S.B., B. Madiha, and Durr-e-Samin Tahir. Drosophila as a model in major neurological disorders and cancer. 39 Rojo, E., M. Selles, C.E. Arboleda-Bustos, and F. Mestres. Autumnal fauna of drosophilids at Font Groga site (Barcelona, Spain). 14 Salceda, V.M. Relative frequencies of deleterious genes in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster originating from the nucleoelectric plant of Laguna Verde, Veracruz. 25 Singh, G., and A.K. Singh. Microsatellite variants in two closely related species of Drosophila: D. bipectinata and D. malerkotliana. 46 Souza, E.L., R.P. Sousa, L.M. Sousa, and F. Roque. Diversity of Brazilian savanna drosophilids in two forest fragments with contrasting degrees of conservation. 49 Srinath, B.S., and N. Shivanna. First report of Chymomyza vaidyai Okada (Diptera: Drosophilidae) from South India. 43 Tahir, D. Description of a Drosophila species of subgenus Pholadoris, and replacement of phylogenetic rank to genus Scaptodrosophila (Drosophilidae-Diptera). 31 Tahir, D. Drosophila – A highly potent research tool, neglected in Pakistan as compared to other Asian countries. 34 Uysal, H., C. Kasimoglu, and A. Ayar. Protective role of rosehip fruit extracts against longevity toxicity of the insecticides ‘Profenofos’ on Drosophila melanogaster. 8 Waddell, P.J. Taxon F of the Drosophila nasuta subgroup and its mating behavior. 54 Waddell, P.J., J. Wang, and C.D. Jones. Stock mislabeling and its impact on phylogenomic analysis in the Drosophila nasuta subgroup/species complex. 59 Teaching Notes Borowski, N.M., B.E. Keating, D.M. Miller, M.A. Balinski, and R.C. Woodruff. Influence of stress on the somatic movement of the mariner DNA element in Drosophila simulans: I. Temperature. 83 Covell, E.A., and R.C. Woodruff. Examining the impacts of inbreeding and temperature on sex ratios of Drosophila melanogaster: A test of the impact of anthropogenic global climate change on population and species conservation. 89 Dros. Inf. Serv. 102 (2019) v Covell, E.A., D.M. Miller, M.A. Balinski, and R.C. Woodruff. Interaction of inbreeding and temperature on viability of Drosophila melanogaster: A test of the impact of inbreeding in future global warming conditions. 79 Miller, D.M., M.A. Balinski, and R.C. Woodruff. The effect of interspecific crowding of Drosophila simulans on the viability of Drosophila melanogaster. 81 Stewart, M.J. Play-doh activity to enhance student understanding of restriction enzymes and plasmid cloning. 85 Thompson, J.N., jr., K. Faria, C.A. Delgado, A.W. Douglas, N.M. Henning, I. Jhingan, M.F. LaPorte, L.E. Longoria, J.R. McKinney, H.S. Park, S. Sowdagar, W. Xie, S. Zhang, and B. Safiejko-Mroczka. Symmetry of developmental cell death in wings of Drosophila melanogaster. 91 Other Reports 60th Annual Drosophila Research Conference, Dallas, TX 96 The North American Drosophila Board 98 vi Dros. Inf. Serv. 102 (2019) Dros. Inf. Serv. 102 (2019) 1 Research Notes Lithium and caffeine interact to alter circadian activity rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster. Li, M., S. Wilensky, and B. Possidente. Biology Department, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 USA; email: [email protected]. Bipolar disorder (BPD) is a psychiatric disorder associated with disrupted rest/activity cycles and cyclical expression of symptoms, hence circadian clock function has been investigated as a mechanism underlying bipolar cycles of mania and depression (Logan and McClung, 2016). Lithium is a focal point of research on BPD since it is a widely used treatment (Sawai et al., 2019). Drugs that interact with lithium, therefore, are of interest because they may alter lithium’s therapeutic effects, and BPD patients have high rates of substance use disorder comorbidity (Nascimento et al., 2015). An increase in manic episodes and suicide risk has been associated with coffee consumption in bipolar patients on lithium (Baethge et al., 2009), though caffeine is generally associated with positive effects on health (Poole et al., 2017). While studies of lithium's effects on circadian rhythmicity have been conducted using mice as a model (e.g., Li et al., 2012; Nascimento et al., 2015; Logan and McClung, 2016), few studies have used Drosophila (Dokucu et al., 2005; Padiath et al., 2009). Drosophila melanogaster has great potential to be used as a model system for studying mechanisms mediating drug interactions because of its short life cycle, high efficiency and convenience in vivo, low cost, and extensive homology with the human genome (Mackay and Anholt, 2006). Padiath et al. (2004) and Dokucu et al. (2005) showed that lithium lengthens the free-running circadian period in male Drosophila, and caffeine has been shown to lengthen circadian clock period in Drosophila (Wu et al., 2009) and in mice (Oike et al., 2011). We present evidence that lithium and caffeine interact to alter the distribution of circadian locomotor activity between the light and dark phases of a 12:12 LD photoperiod in both male and female fruit flies. Male and female Drosophila melanogaster from wild type strain Oregon-R were obtained from Carolina Biological Supply (Burlington, North Carolina, USA) and maintained at Skidmore College for 37 years. Four males and four females were placed in each of 20 plastic vials (65 mm long and 23.5 mm diameter) with Carolina Instant Drosophila Medium (Carolina Biological Supply) and incubated at 25°C in a 12:12 LD photoperiod.