Naval and Maritime Workshop Rino Pivirotto Director, Technology Security & Cooperative Programs Navy International Programs Office 25 February 2003

UK-US Defense Industry Seminar

1 What We Do Navy IPO Develops and Implements DoN International Policy and Manages International Efforts in Research, Development and Acquisition for DoN IAW SECNAV Instruction 5430.103 of 23 Dec 92. Security Assistance Customer • Foreign Military Sales DoN • Excess Defense Article (EDA) Transfers Foreign Countries • International Training • Presidential Drawdowns • Direct Commercial Sales Stakeholders Technology Security Regional Commanders • Disclosure Policy/Oversight (TTSARBs) OSD • Export Licensing Secretariat Cooperative Programs OPNAV • International Agreements (MOUs) State Dept. • Foreign Comparative Testing (FCT) Industry • Data and Personnel Exchange PEOs/SYSCOMs (DEAs/ESEP) Commerce Dept.

2 Tracking Business Opportunities

Major Domestic Programs

Milestones (RFIs, RFPs, etc.)

Larger Companies

3 Tracking Business Opportunities

Major Domestic Programs

Milestones (RFIs, RFPs, etc.)

Larger Companies

4 Tracking Business Opportunities Large Major Domestic Programs

Milestones (RFIs, RFPs, etc.)

Larger Companies

Small Smaller Domestic Programs

Smaller Milestones Companies (RFIs, RFPs, etc.)

5 Tracking Business Opportunities Large Major Domestic Programs

Milestones (RFIs, RFPs, etc.) strategic relationships past working relationship Larger engage the prime prior to contract Companies award engage the prime after contract award Small Smaller Domestic Programs

Smaller Milestones Companies (RFIs, RFPs, etc.)

6 Tracking Business Opportunities Large Domestic Large Foreign

Major Major Domestic Foreign Programs Programs Strategic Partnership Milestones with Foreign Milestones (RFIs, RFPs, Company (RFIs, RFPs, etc.) etc.)

Larger Companies Small Small Foreign Domestic Smaller Strategic Smaller Domestic Partnership Foreign Programs with Foreign Programs Company Smaller Milestones Milestones Companies (RFIs, RFPs, (RFIs, RFPs, etc.) etc.)

7 Agenda

• Deepwater • Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) • Foreign Comparative Test (FCT) • Defense Acquisition Challenge Program • US-UK Government-to- Government Agreements

8 Foreign Comparative Test

Goes Unfulfilled

Outstanding US New Development Requirement Program

Allied production equipment MAY meet requirement

• FCT Program provides funds to test allied equipment • Budgeted funds for production of item is a key criteria

9 Foreign Comparative Test Process US Program Manager drafts FCT project OSD reviews proposal all Service proposals and selects project IAW criteria and funding constraints

Foreign contractor sells idea to US Program Manager

Navy IPO ranks all DoN proposals

10 InternationalInternational ParticipationParticipation inin DoN’sDoN’s ForeignForeign ComparativeComparative TestingTesting (FCT)(FCT) ProgramProgram

Italy Denmark Norway 4 2 Netherlands 5 Russia Others 6 4 3 United Kingdon Belgium 65 7 Austrailia 9

Sweden 12

Israel 13 France Germany 14 Canada 19 17 11 UK Companies Participating in FCT Program Since 1980

• AARDVARK CLEAR MINE • COMPTON-WEBB, CATALFA • MARCONI • ROYAL ORDNANCE • ADVANCED POWER HOUSE • MARCONI AVIONICS • SCHERMULY SOURCES • COSSOR ELECTRONICS • MARCONI DEFENCE SYSTEM • SENSOR ELECTRONICS, LTD. • AEROTECH/DERA • COSSOR, PLESSEY • MARCONI SPACE AND DEFENCE • SIEBE GORMAN, PROTECTOR • AIRBORNE INDUSTRIES • DATA SCIENCES • MARK INDUSTRIES SAFETY • AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE • DEFENCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS • MARLOWE ROPES • SMITHS INDUSTRIES SUPPORT SVCS. • DOWTY MAGNETICS • MATRA-MARCONI • SOS LTD. • AIRCRAFT MATERIALS, LTD • IRVIN G.B. • MEGGITT • STANDARD TEL., MARCONI • ALVIS W/SCHEIBEL OF • IRVIN INDUSTRIES • METALITE AVIATION LIGHTING UNDERWATER AUSTRIA • ISTECH • MID-WEST ENGINES • STELLA-META FILTERS • ARMAMENT EXPERIMENTAL • E.P. BARRUS • STONEFIELD-OMICRON ELEC ESTABLISHMENT • ML AVIATION • ELETTRONICA UK, LTD. • ML WALLOP DEFENCE SYSTEMS • STRACHEN AND HENSHAW • AVON INDUSTRY • SURREY SATELLITE TECHNOLOGY POLYMERS • EML • MODULAR DIST. (EX-JOLODA) • THALES • BAE SYSTEMS • ENGLANDS, LTD. • MONARFLEX • EPS LOGISTICS TECH • MULTI-FAB • THALES DEFENCE (NEE RACAL), • BAE-ROYAL ORDNANCE QINETIQ • BAE-ROYAL ORDNANCE- • FAIREY ALLDAY MARINE • NORMALAIR-GARRETT • FERRANTI COMPUTER SYSTEMS • THALES UNDERWATER SYS (NEE THOMSON THORN • OCTEC LTD THOMSON MARCONI SONAR) • FERRANTI • BDL SYSTEMS • PAINS-WESSEX • THOMSON MARCONI SONAR, LTD. • FILTRONICS COMPONENTS AND • BEAUFORT AIR-SEA • PEARSON ENGINEERING • THOMSON-MARCONI • BRIDPORT GUNDRY SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS • PERKINS • FLIGHT REFUELING LTD. • THORN EMI • BRITISH AEROJET • PILKINGTON OPTRONICS • THORN EMI ELECTRONICS • BRITISH AEROJET, VICKERS • GEC MARCONI • PLESSEY MARINE • GKN • UK METEOROLOGICAL OFFICE • BRITISH AEROSPACE CORP • PLESSEY NAVAL SYSTEMS • ULTRA ELECTRONICS • C&S ANTENNA • GLOSTER SARIO • PLESSEY RADAR COMPANY • GQ PARACHUTES • ULTRA ELECTRONICS (DOWTY FUEL • CAMBRIDGE CONSULTANTS • PLESSEY RADIO SYSTEMS) • GRASEBY DYNAMICS, LTD. • CHEM-BIO DEFENCE • PORTSMOUTH AVIATION • UMC INTERNATIONAL • GRASEBY IONICS ESTABLISHMENT (PW • PTARMIGAN SWITCH • VICKERS DEFENCE SYSTEMS DEFENCE LTD, NEE PAINS- • HEYWOOD WILLIAMS • PURIFICATION PRODUCTS LTD. • W.L. GORE WESSEX) • HUNTING ENGINEERING • TQINETIQ • WALLOPS INDUSTRIES • CHEMRING LTD • IMPERIAL METAL INDUSTRIES • RACAL • WAVETEK • CLOGWYLN • INMOS • RACAL ACOUSTICS • WESTLAND HELICOPTER • COLEBRAND • LAURENCE SCOTT DEFENCE • RAYTHEON SYSTEMS LTD. OF THE • WIDNEY AISH, CORRINTEC SYSTEMS UK • REDIFFUSION RADIO SYSTEMS • ROLLS ROYCE 12 Foreign Comparative Test Process

Total Program FY 2003 $33M (OSD PE) Management/POC: OSD (AT&L/AS&C/FCT) COL Linda Palmer email: [email protected] phone: (703)602-3740 Navy/POC: Navy International Programs Office Mr. Michael Locke email: [email protected] phone: (202)764-2448 Key Dates 15 December Summary proposal submission deadline for following fiscal year

1 May Final proposal submission deadline for following fiscal year 1 July Project selection announcement for following fiscal year "Typical" Project Funding $200K - $4M

13 Defense Acquisition Challenge Program

• Provides increased opportunities to insert innovative and cost-saving technologies into acquisition programs of the Department of Defense. • For current acquisition programs, funds the test and evaluation of technologies and products that have the potential to improve • performance • affordability • manufacturability • operational capability 14 Challenge Program Process

US or Foreign contractor BAA projected to be out by 15 March. submits, i.a.w. Broad Area Announcement, Response time for 2003 likely to be 15 Summary Proposal to days. (To be 30 days in out years.) OSD Comparative Testing Office

OSD selects proposals that meet preliminary criteria, then forwards to the Services for consideration

Contractor selected above sells idea to US Program Manager

US Program Manager drafts Full Proposal and submits to OSD

OSD reviews all Service proposals and selects project i.a.w. criteria and funding constraints 15 Defense Acquisition Challenge Program

Total Program FY 2003 $12.8M (OSD PE) Management/POC: OSD (AT&L/AS&C/FCT) COL Linda Palmer email: [email protected] phone: (703)602-3740 Navy/POC: Navy International Programs Office Mr. Michael Locke email: [email protected] phone: (202)764-2448 Key Dates 15 December Summary proposal submission deadline for following fiscal year

1 May Final proposal submission deadline for following fiscal year 1 July Project selection announcement for following fiscal year "Typical" Project Funding $500K - $3M 16 Contrasting the FCT and Challenge Programs

FCT Challenge Open to Non-US firms only Open to US or Non-US firms

Requirement for prior No requirement for prior notification requirement to notification requirement to Congress Congress

Scope - test and evaluation of Scope - test and evaluation of non-development items from technologies and products that allied and friendly nations to have the potential to improve satisfy U.S. defense performance, affordability, requirements, manufacturability, or operational capability of current acquisition programs

17 MOUs with the UK

The U.K. is the Largest International Cooperative Partner for the U.S. Department of the Navy (Measured by number of MOUs)

• 65 Active MOUs • 18 New In-Process MOUs

Highlights of Potential MOUs Follows

18 Harrier Post-Production Support Project Summary Project Status • U.S. has two separate cooperative • 1st Negotiation session held MOUs for the Harrier program with UK on 22-23 January 2003. and with Italy and Spain. • Anticipated Efforts under the • New Framework MOU among Italy, Framework MOU will cost Spain, UK, and U.S. will allow identification and investigation of approximately $11M and last collaborative opportunities related to 10 years. post-production support of Harriers. • Objectives include: • Promote interoperability and systems safety. • Identify and pursue cooperative cost- effective post-production support. • Identify and implement upgrades to enhance warfighting effectiveness and improve readiness. • Project Arrangements (PA) may be established to carry out specific projects identified under the Framework MOU. 19 Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (UUV) Technology

Project Summary Project Status • Potential U.S.-UK project to develop • Project proposal in pre- and demonstrate advanced negotiation national staffing in capabilities and mature technologies the U.S. for UUVs to support development of a large UUV (>21 inch diameter) while • Anticipate PA signature in mid- also benefiting elements of existing 2003. UUV programs: • PA cost approximately $30M, • Autonomous operations shared equally by U.S. and UK. • Remote communications • Sensing and integration • Autonomous deployment of advanced sensor arrays • Project will be a Project Arrangement (PA) under U.S.-UK Research and Development umbrella MOU.

20 Advanced Radar Technology Integrated System Testbed (ARTIST) PA

Project Summary Project Status • R&D of advanced maritime active • Technical Discussions phased array radars to support future completed maritime radars and/or upgrades to existing systems. • PA is awaiting ASN(RDA) approval to negotiate • Lead to an advanced digital phased array baseline design for maritime • Approx. $88M project cost TBMD application as an upgrade to the U.S. Navy SPY-1 radar or as a new development forward-fit radar to U.S. SOLID STATE SPY and UK SAMPSON. Three tasks: • Specification of common digital Multi- Functional Radar control system; • Joint testing; and • Integration of high power solid state active phased array antenna in an open digital array architecture.

21 Standoff High-Speed Option for Counterproliferation (SHOC) ACTD PA

Project Summary Project Status • Potential UK participation in parts of • ACTD proposal in Navy staffing overall U.S. ACTD for Supersonic • Technical Discussions ongoing Cruise Missile known as SHOC. pending Navy decision on ACTD • Proposed SHOC ACTD is to design, integrate, demonstrate and deliver a • ACTD cost (cooperative project weapon system capable of: cost will be a subset – yet to be • Defeating hard and deeply buried discussed) approx. $120M chem-bio targets • Defeating time sensitive targets • Shorten sensor-to-shooter cycle • Improving weapon survivability through high-altitude/high speed

22 Anti-Ship Missile MOU

Project Summary Project Status • Potential multilateral • NAVAIR/OPNAV conducting project analysis of alternatives study • Proposed project IOC • Technical Discussions ongoing, 2010 or later next round week of 24 FEB 2003 • Efforts expected to cost approx. • Areas being studied: $195M • Improved Target Selectivity • Coastal Target Suppression Improvements • Extending Missile Range • Mission Planning System & Launch System Improvements

23 Submarine Communications PA

Project Summary Project Status • Potential project for Submarine • U.S./UK Technical Discussions Satellite Information Exchange ongoing System (SSIXS) Transition to • SPAWAR developing staffing Internet Protocol (IP) Format package for Navy IPO to get • Will enhance communications approval to negotiate the PA interoperability & compatibility • PA to supplement activities • Will facilitate communications ongoing under DEAs and FMS during operations when one Navy is under the Operational Control (OPCON) of the other

24 Conclusion

• FCT and Challenge programs provide opportunities for large and small, US and UK contractors alike. • Many MOUs are in work, and if consummated, a mixture of US and UK content is expected.