Charley's Aunt Preview Programme As of June 30

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Charley's Aunt Preview Programme As of June 30 The Author P R E V I E W P R O G R A M M E BRANDON THOMAS (1848-1914) was born in Liverpool on Christmas Eve THE BMO STAGE, JULY 9 TO JULY 31 1848 into a family that had no theatrical connections (his father was a boot seller). ROYAL GEORGE THEATRE, AUGUST 8 TO OCTOBER 10 Thomas joined the Royal Marines when he was fourteen, but soon left to fi nd work in the shipbuilding industry, fi rst in Liverpool, then in Hull, while supple- menting his income with forays into journalism. He also discovered a talent for entertaining, initially as a singer and poetry reciter at temperance meetings. Hav- ing met prominent London actors William and Madge Kendal, while they were TIM CARROLL, ARTISTIC DIRECTOR | TIM JENNINGS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR touring the English provinces, Thomas moved to London in 1879 and began his acting career in a variety of minor roles, before touring the United States for nine MIKE NADAJEWSKI, PETER FERNANDES months in 1885. On his return to London, he won roles in plays by important contemporary playwrights such as Arthur Wing Pinero, and in classics such as and ANDREW LAWRIE in Sheridan’s The Rivals, in which Shaw praised him for acting “agreeably and with dignity.” On other occasions Shaw expressed admiration for Thomas’s “genuine feeling,” and defended him when “it looked as if he were killing the play, whereas the play was really killing him.” CHARLEY’S AUNT Thomas’s debut as a playwright, a domestic comedy called Comrades, which by ran at London’s Court Theatre in December 1882, was not enthusiastically re- Brandon Thomas ceived (“it is impossible that a solid structure can be built upon a foundation of sand,” said The Times), but he persevered with several other forgettable plays, with NEIL BARCLAY, PATRICK GALLIGAN, none of which foreshadowed the triumph of Charley’s Aunt in 1892. It was, said ALEXIS GORDON, CLAIRE JULLIEN, MARLA McLEAN, the Manchester Guardian, “an instant and incontestable success, keeping the audi- ence in shrieks of laughter.” Thomas was in the cast of the London premiere RIC REID and GABRIELLA SUNDAR SINGH (as Francis Chesney) and he continued to appear on the London stage in a range of other plays, including Shakespeare’s Richard II (as John of Gaunt) in 1903. In December 1888 Thomas married Marguerite Leverson, despite the objections of her Jewish family. Two of their three children became ac- tors and appeared regularly in Charley’s Aunt after their father’s death. Directed by TIM CARROLL Shaw thought more highly of Thomas’s acting than perhaps Thom- as himself did, but could not deny that his fame rested on Charley’s Aunt. Designed by CHRISTINE LOHRE When Shaw went on an ego trip in a 1924 interview about how famous he was, he used the play as a measure of his fame: “My currency,” he said, “is as universal as that of Sherlock Holmes, or Charlie Chaplin, or Charley’s Aunt.” CHARLEY’S AUNT is generously sponsored by We acknowledge and honour the land upon which we gather today as the historic and traditional territory of First Nations peoples. In particular, we recognize and thank the Neutral Nation, the Mary E. Hill Mississauga and the Haudenosaunee for their stewardship of these lands over millennia. ** The Christopher Newton Intern is generously The videotaping or other video or audio recording of this production is strictly prohibited. supported by Marilyn and Charles Baillie. Director’s Notes THE CAST In Order of Appearance by Tim Carroll Jack Chesney PETER FERNANDES This is my second time directing Charley’s Aunt. I haven’t done many plays more Brassett NEIL BARCLAY than once. Not many directors do, apart from a couple of the big Shakespeares. Charley Wykeham ANDREW LAWRIE But, for any directors reading this, I can really recommend the experience. It’s Lord Fancourt Babberley MIKE NADAJEWSKI like coming back to a great novel one read in one’s youth. The piece may not have changed, but you have. Kitty Verdun MARLA McLEAN I fi rst did this play in 1994, when I was not even thirty years old. At the time, Amy Spettigue ALEXIS GORDON I looked about twelve, so it was strange to be directing actors thirty years older Colonel Sir Francis Chesney PATRICK GALLIGAN than me. They tended to look at me as though they thought it was Bring Your Stephen Spettigue RIC REID Child to Work Day. That, I suppose, is one advantage of getting old and grey: people assume you know what you’re doing. In rehearsal I do my best to correct Donna Lucia D’Alvadorez CLAIRE JULLIEN that notion as soon as possible. Ela Delahay GABRIELLA SUNDAR SINGH It’s a mark of a great play when reading it is completely unlike watching it. Walking Covers KALEB ALEXANDER Chekhov has this quality: on the page, you don’t realize how many reactions each OLIVIA SINCLAIR-BRISBANE** line might be provoking, or how signifi cant a stage direction can be. Then you watch it in the theatre, and it’s the reaction that breaks your heart, or the entrance of that person at just that moment that makes you want to hide your eyes. Char- The play takes place during Commemoration Week, Oxford, 1892. ley’s Aunt is like that. When you read it, it seems so simple. When you try to stage ACT I: Jack Chesney’s rooms in College. Morning. it, you realize that those old theatre pros knew what they were doing. Every new event or revelation is perfectly timed to take our protagonists from a perfectly INTERMISSION reasonable starting point into the heart of confusion and chaos. ACT II: Garden outside Jack Chesney’s rooms. Afternoon. Like all farces, Charley’s Aunt happens in no real time or place. Its setting is Oxford, and its time is 1892, but it is no Oxford that ever existed, and its period INTERMISSION is only helpful in that it imposes certain social rules which intensify the problems ACT III: Drawing room at Spettigue’s house. Evening. to be solved. Otherwise, it is a fairy-tale place, created only for the duration of the play, melting into nothing as soon as the curtain falls. And yet, within that artifi cial world, the people are recognizable and their desires and fears all too Stage Manager DIANE KONKIN human. It’s a delightfully daft confection, but it’s also a kind and humane play. Assistant Stage Manager ASHLEY IRELAND The sort of play that is worth doing twice. Production Stage Manager MEREDITH MACDONALD Production History Assistant Designer BEYATA HACKBORN Charley’s Aunt opened at the Theatre Royal in Bury St Edmunds on February Assistant Lighting Designer NICK ANDISON 29, 1892, and toured the English provinces before the London premiere at the Voice and Dialect Coach JEFFREY SIMLETT Royalty Theatre on December 21, 1892. It transferred to the larger Globe The- atre on January 30, 1893. The total London run was 1,466 performances. In the many British stage revivals, Lord Fancourt Babberley has been played by such For Artist photo and bio information, please go to shawfest.com/charleys-aunt stars as Leslie Phillips, John Mills, Tom Courtenay and Griff Rhys Jones. BBC Special thanks to Sharry Flett and Alexis Milligan. television revivals have featured Bernard Cribbins, Donald Wolfi t, Danny La Additional costumes by Jennifer Wonnacott of Kipper Tailoring. Rue and Ronnie Barker. In the U.S., Charley’s Aunt opened on Broadway at the Standard Theatre on October 2, 1893, and ran for four years. A 1940 revival headlined by José Ferrer as Babberley ran for over six months, but managed only UNDERSTUDIES fi fteen performances when Ferrer reprised the role in 1953. A live CBS television KALEB ALEXANDER, Jack Chesney, Brassett, Charley Wykeham; production in 1957 starred Art Carney (Babberley), Orson Bean (Charley) and NEIL BARCLAY, Stephen Spettigue; PETER FERNANDES, Lord Fancourt Babberley; Jeanette MacDonald (Donna Lucia). The Canadian premiere was at Toronto’s RIC REID, Colonel Sir Francis Chesney; OLIVIA SINCLAIR-BRISBANE, Kitty Verdun, Grand Opera House on December 12, 1906, starring Etienne Girardot. Charley’s Amy Spettigue, Ela Delahay; DONNA SOARES, Donna Lucia D’Alvadorez Aunt has been performed world-wide and translated into over twenty languages. The best-known of several fi lm versions was made by 20th Century Fox in Running time is approximately 2 hours and 35 minutes including two intermissions 1941. Directed by Archie Mayo, it featured Jack Benny as Babberley..
Recommended publications
  • Linley Sambourne's Diary 1889
    LINLEY SAMBOURNE'S DIARY 1889 Notes on preliminary pages: (Red ink: Store ticket for 1889 61061) Candles for reading lamp, Vegetable wax S.S.6's 3/9 per packet. No good, sperm wanted. Miss Gill, 2 King's Road, Brownswood Park, N. George Finlay Esq, General Manager's Office, L & NW Rly, Euston. G.M.Rich Esq, Station Master, Euston. Fred Dougall Esq, The Highland Railway, General Manager's Office, Inverness. Models: Miss Etty Pettigrew, 7 Musgrave Crescent, Walham Green Miss Lily Pettigrew. Grove, 174 Brompton Road, S.W. Mrs Stephenson, 34 Jervis Road, Lillie Road, West Kensington S.W. Meg Dartrey, 109 Eaton Terrace S.W. Miss L Price, 2 Goodson Road, Lillie road, West Brompton S.W. Nellie Hall, 3 Dartmouth Road, Forest Hill, S.W. Tall & slight, good figure. Adah Fletcher, 18 Goldsmith Residences, Goldsmith Road, Peckham S.E. (Crossed out in red ink.) No good (added in red ink.) (Red ink: Abbey's housekeeper, Martha Keevil.) Hamilton Bruce, 4 Eccleston St, Chester Sq. Archibald McGregor, 126 Campden Houses, Pell St, Kensington. P.C. 305. F. Weldon, 108 Victoria Street S.W. Charles A Howell, 91 Southampton Row, Russell Sq, next Bedford Hotel W.C. E.Coleman Esq, Veterinary Surgeon, Tooting. Iodine charges. Caron D'Ache, 59 Rue de la Tour, Passy. Address for boots in Paris: Coquillot, 10 Rue de la Bourse, Paris. Book on South Seas from Curacoa Wiseman: A ride through the disturbed districts of New Zealand, together with some account of the South Sea Islands, being reflections from the journals & letters of Lieut the Hon Herbert Meade R.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Drake Plays 1927-2021.Xls
    Drake Plays 1927-2021.xls TITLE OF PLAY 1927-8 Dulcy SEASON You and I Tragedy of Nan Twelfth Night 1928-9 The Patsy SEASON The Passing of the Third Floor Back The Circle A Midsummer Night's Dream 1929-30 The Swan SEASON John Ferguson Tartuffe Emperor Jones 1930-1 He Who Gets Slapped SEASON Miss Lulu Bett The Magistrate Hedda Gabler 1931-2 The Royal Family SEASON Children of the Moon Berkeley Square Antigone 1932-3 The Perfect Alibi SEASON Death Takes a Holiday No More Frontier Arms and the Man Twelfth Night Dulcy 1933-4 Our Children SEASON The Bohemian Girl The Black Flamingo The Importance of Being Earnest Much Ado About Nothing The Three Cornered Moon 1934-5 You Never Can Tell SEASON The Patriarch Another Language The Criminal Code 1935-6 The Tavern SEASON Cradle Song Journey's End Good Hope Elizabeth the Queen 1936-7 Squaring the Circle SEASON The Joyous Season Drake Plays 1927-2021.xls Moor Born Noah Richard of Bordeaux 1937-8 Dracula SEASON Winterset Daugthers of Atreus Ladies of the Jury As You Like It 1938-9 The Bishop Misbehaves SEASON Enter Madame Spring Dance Mrs. Moonlight Caponsacchi 1939-40 Laburnam Grove SEASON The Ghost of Yankee Doodle Wuthering Heights Shadow and Substance Saint Joan 1940-1 The Return of the Vagabond SEASON Pride and Prejudice Wingless Victory Brief Music A Winter's Tale Alison's House 1941-2 Petrified Forest SEASON Journey to Jerusalem Stage Door My Heart's in the Highlands Thunder Rock 1942-3 The Eve of St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contributions of James F. Neill to the Development of the Modern Ameri­ Can Theatrical Stock Company
    This dissertation has been 65—1234 microfilmed exactly as received ZUCCHERO, William Henry, 1930- THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF JAMES F. NEILL TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODERN AMERI­ CAN THEATRICAL STOCK COMPANY. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1964 Speech—Theater University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Copyright by William Henry Zucchero 1965 THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF JAMES F. NEILL TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODERN AMERICAN THEATRICAL STOCK COMPANY DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By William Henry Zucchero, B.S., M.A. * * * * * $ The Ohio State University 1964 Approved by PLEASE NOTE: Plates are not original copy. Some are blurred and indistinct. Filmed as received. UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS, INC. PREFACE Appreciation is extended to the individuals, named below, for the aid each has given in the research, prepara­ tion, and execution of this study. The gathering of pertinent information on James F. Neill, his family, and his early life, was made possible through the efforts of Mrs. Eugene A. Stanley of the Georgia Historical Society, Mr. C. Robert Jones (Director, the Little Theatre of Savannah, Inc.), Miss Margaret Godley of the Savannah Public Library, Mr. Frank Rossiter (columnist, The Savannah Morning News). Mrs. Gae Decker (Savannah Chamber of Commerce), Mr. W. M. Crane (University of Georgia Alumni Association), Mr. Don Williams (member of Sigma Alpha Epsilon— Neill’s college fraternity), and Mr. Alfred Kent Mordecai of Savannah, Georgia. For basic research on the operation of the Neill company, and information on stock companies, in general, aid was provided by Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Report
    COLLECTION FINDING AID John McCallum, AO, CBE (1918–2010) Performing Arts Programs and Ephemera (PROMPT) Australian Collection Development In collecting materials relating to prominent Australians, programs and ephemera documenting all aspects of John McCallum stage acting career in Australia and overseas. Material on McCallum’s film and television screen career is not generally collected by the Library. The list is based on imperfect holdings and is updated as gaps in the Library’s holdings for this artist are filled. Content Printed materials in the PROMPT collection include programs and printed ephemera such as brochures, leaflets, tickets, etc. Theatre programs are taken as the prime documentary evidence of a performance by McCallum. In a few cases however, the only evidence of a performance is a piece of printed ephemera. In these cases the type of piece is identified, eg, brochure. The list is based on imperfect holdings and is updated as gaps in the Library’s holdings for this artist are filled. Unless otherwise stated, all entries are based on published programs in the PROMPT collection. Access The John McCallum PROMPT files may be accessed through the Library’s Petherick Reading Room by eCallslip request: http://nla.gov.au/nla.cat‐vn3529350. Arrangement The McCallum material in the PROMPT Collection is in the chronological order of his Australian and overseas performance and this list reflects this arrangement. Entries identify the city and the venue. All the information is taken from programs, flyers and ephemera. www.nla.gov.au Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.1 Australia June 2010 PROMPT Collection Finding Aid John McCallum, AO, CBE (1918–2010) Entries for each program are arranged as follows: Year, day/s and month; Venue/Theatre (Location) Company Name of production / Creator McCallum’s role or other involvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Frohman: Manager and Man, by Isaac 1
    Charles Frohman: Manager and Man, by Isaac 1 Charles Frohman: Manager and Man, by Isaac The Project Gutenberg eBook, Charles Frohman: Manager and Man, by Isaac Frederick Marcosson and Daniel Frohman, et al This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Charles Frohman: Manager and Man Author: Isaac Frederick Marcosson and Daniel Frohman Release Date: July 29, 2008 [eBook #26146] Charles Frohman: Manager and Man, by Isaac 2 Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CHARLES FROHMAN: MANAGER AND MAN*** E-text prepared by Robert Cicconetti, Chuck Greif, and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net) Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this file which includes the original illustrations. See 26146-h.htm or 26146-h.zip: (http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/2/6/1/4/26146/26146-h/26146-h.htm) or (http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/2/6/1/4/26146/26146-h.zip) CHARLES FROHMAN: MANAGER AND MAN by ISAAC F. MARCOSSON and DANIEL FROHMAN With an Appreciation by James M. Barrie Illustrated with Portraits New York and London Harper & Brothers M.C.M.X.V.I Charles Frohman: Manager and Man Copyright, 1916, by Harper & Brothers Copyright, 1915, 1916, by International Magazine Company (Cosmopolitan Magazine) Printed in the United States of America Published October, 1916 To The Theater Charles Frohman: Manager and Man, by Isaac 3 That Charles Frohman Loved and Served Nought I did in hate but all in honor! HAMLET Contents CHARLES FROHMAN: AN APPRECIATION I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Staging of Oscar Wilde and His Contemporaries at the St
    Responding to the ‘power of attraction’: the staging of Oscar Wilde and his contemporaries at the St. James’s Theatre, 1892-1895. Lucie Sutherland Keywords: Actor-manager, George Alexander, Treasury Book, West End, Matinée, Repertoire William Archer, a cultural commentator most often associated with the promotion of dramatic naturalism, did not solely concern himself with dramatic form. He was also alert to the necessity for profit in professional theatre making, often demonstrating a concern with the economic viability of theatrical production in his writing. For example: It would of course be idle to suppose that the comparative popularity of two plays is exactly indicated by the length of their respective runs […] It is impossible, in short, without access to the books of the management, to measure with absolute precision the power of attraction exercised by any particular play.1 Archer states what theatre industry professionals and scholars of that industry know; only box office receipts can truly confirm the economic success of a production. Length of run and audience figures may be indicative, but accurate business records detailing the income generated by fee paying audience members will be the only way to ascertain the ‘power of attraction’ exercised by a piece of theatre. When Archer was writing, in the final decade of the nineteenth century, it was the role of the actor-manager to market a production as successful for the longest duration possible, frequently sustaining that production to demonstrate the ongoing prestige of the
    [Show full text]
  • Centrality, Orthodoxy and Self-Reflexivity In
    Prague Journal of English Studies Volume 1, No. 1, 2012 '2,SMHV ISSN: 1804-8722 “Our Little Parish of St. James‘s”: Centrality, Orthodoxy and Self-Reflexivity in the 1890s London Theatre Rudolf Weiss In the 1890s the London theatre was governed by the idea of centrality. is most representative and most prestigious theatrical territory was ruled by the actor-manager, the monocratic director who also played the leading roles. Moreover, he was the arbiter in matters of dramatic aesthetics, in matters of dramatic ethics as well as audience reception. Henry Arthur Jones and Arthur Wing Pinero, the most popular playwrights of the period, provided them with leading parts which reflect their managerial functions in the dramatic world: the raisonneurs in their society dramas manipulate the action, advise the other characters and represent social and moral orthodoxy. e article explores the concept of centrality in the London theatre of the 1890s on various interconnected levels – theatre management, dramatic technique, functions of the raisonneur and ideological implications of the scène à faire as well as audience structure and audience taste. A special focus is placed on the essential (self)reflexivity of this “little parish”, where the managerial structures of the mainstream theatre are mirrored in the conventional dramatic aesthetics of society drama, the predominant genre in the repertoire, which echoes the mind-set of the majority of the spectators. 1. Introduction: the authority of the actor-manager In her introductory chapter to e Cambridge Companion to Victorian and Edwardian eatre Nina Auerbach claims that all the contributions in this volume “insist on the centrality of the theatre in nineteenth-century culture; until the end of the century, its broad popularity gave its conventions the aura of universality” (4).
    [Show full text]
  • Stages of Subscription, 1880–1930
    Stages of Subscription, 1880–1930 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37944972 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Stages of Subscription, 1880–1930 A dissertation presented by Matthew Scott Franks to The Department of English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of English Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts December 2016 © 2016 Matthew Scott Franks All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Leah Price Matthew Scott Franks Stages of Subscription, 1880–1930 Abstract Subscription redistricted turn-of-the-century British and Irish theater audiences in seemingly contradictory ways, alternately appealing to coteries or crowds. At a time when women, the working classes, and the Irish were advocating for greater political representation outside the theater, subscribers circumvented the Lord Chamberlain and London commercial theater managers in order to legislate repertoires and policies on the rest of the public’s behalf. Printed subscription ephemera created virtual stages on which subscribers could enact and reimagine their social relationships, whether by pinning their tickets together in order to secure adjoining seats, or by crowding newspaper columns with letters protesting unfair treatment from theater managers, or simply by reading their name—or a name—next to others on a list.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise:And Fall of the Theatrical Syndicate In
    The rise and fall of the Theatrical Syndicate in America Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Greer, LeAnn Horn, 1935- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 02/10/2021 04:40:04 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555109 THE RISE:AND FALL OF THE THEATRICAL SYNDICATE IN AMERICA by LeAnn Horn Greer A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF DRAMA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manu­ script in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: WILLIAM A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Doll's House Conquered Europe
    Article “A Doll’s House Conquered Europe”: Ibsen, His English Parodists, and the Debate over World Drama Mary Christian Department of English, Middle Georgia State University, 1100 SE 2nd St. Cochran, Macon, GA 31014, USA; [email protected] Received: 14 March 2019; Accepted: 18 April 2019; Published: 22 April 2019 Abstract: The London premieres of Henrik Ibsen’s plays in the late 1880s and 1890s sparked strong reactions both of admiration and disgust. This controversy, I suggest, was largely focused on national identity and artistic cosmopolitanism. While Ibsen’s English supporters viewed him as a leader of a new international theatrical movement, detractors dismissed him as an obscure writer from a primitive, marginal nation. This essay examines the ways in which these competing assessments were reflected in the English adaptations, parodies, and sequels of Ibsen’s plays that were written and published during the final decades of the nineteenth century, texts by Henry Herman and Henry Arthur Jones, Walter Besant, Bernard Shaw, Eleanor Marx and Israel Zangwill, and F. Anstey (Thomas Anstey Guthrie). These rewritings tended to respond to Ibsen’s foreignness in one of three ways: Either to assimilate the plays’ settings, characters, and values into normative Englishness; to exaggerate their exoticism (generally in combination with a suggestion of moral danger); or to keep their Norwegian settings and depict those settings (along with characters and ideas) as ordinary and familiar. Through their varying responses to Ibsen’s Norwegian origin, I suggest, these adaptations offered a uniquely practical and concrete medium for articulating ideas about the ways in which art shapes both national identity and the international community.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Personal Relationships in the Plays of Henrik Ibsen and Arthur
    INTER-PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE PLAYS OF HENRIK IBSEN AND ARTHUR WING PINERO A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in English in the University of Canterbury by N. E. Peters University of Canterbury 1987 i CONTENTS ABSTRACT ii REFERENCES iii INTRODUCTION 1 PART ONE INTER-PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS: A TEXTUAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 1 FAMILIAL RELATIONSHIPS :i CHAPTER 2 INTER-SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS 32 CHAPTER 3 FRIENDSHIP RELATIONS 60 CHAPTER 4 INTER-CLASS RELATIONSHIPS 83 PART TWO CONVERGENCE VERSUS DIVERGENCE: THE REASONS WHY CHAPTER 5 HUMAN NATURE 100 CHAPTER 6 THE COLLECTIVE VERSUS THE INDIVIDUAL 127 CONCLUSION 158 NOTES 161 BIBLIOGRAPHY 167 ii ABSTRACT Henrik Ibsen is widely accepted as being one of the most important influences on the Modern Drama, while Arthur Wing Pinero, the most successful English playwright of the l880's, has been almost forgotten. Ibsen criticism has become repetitive, while criticism of Pinero's work is both superficial and sporadic. There is no comparative study of Ibsen with the English dramatists of the 1880's. The study of Inter-personal Relationships in the plays of Ibsen and Pinero not only provides further insight into the work of each, but also a starting point for just such a comparison. Part One involves a close textual analysis. For the purposes of this study, Inter-personal Relationships are divided into four main types: Familial, Inter-sexual, Friendship and Inter-class. Part One concludes that Convergence, the mutual union of individuals, predominates in Pinero, while Divergence is paramount in Ibsen. Part Two considers possible reasons for this dichotomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Twentieth Century British Drama
    CONTEXTS IN LITERATURE Twentieth Century British Drama John Smart Series Editor: Adrian Barlow PUBLISHED BY THE P RESS S YNDICATE OF THE U NIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE U NIVERSITY P RESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011–4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org © Cambridge University Press 2001 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2001 Reprinted 2004 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typefaces: Clearface and Mixage System: QuarkXPress® 4.1 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0 521 79563 X paperback Prepared for publication by Gill Stacey Designed by Tattersall Hammarling & Silk Cover photograph: Photostage/Donald Cooper. Still from Look Back in Anger, Lyttleton Theatre 15.7.99 (Jason Hughes, Michael Sheen, Emma Fielding) Contents Introduction 6 1 Approaching 20th-century British drama 8 The Edwardian age 8 The Edwardian theatre 10 The new theatre: the influence of Ibsen and Shaw 11 The growth of the new theatre 14 The Great War and after 16 Noel Coward 18 The 1930s 19 Workers’ theatre 20 The commercial theatre 21 W.H. Auden and the Group Theatre 21 T.S.
    [Show full text]