AGENDA Monday, March 9, 2020

PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

5:30 pm Dinner (Committee/Staff) – Staff breakroom Customer Service Building 6:00pm Public Meeting Session - Goodpasture Rm. 3050 N. Delta Hwy., Eugene, OR 97408

PAC Meeting I. Introductions – (5 min.) II. Public Comment – (up to 10 min.) III. Assignment Review – all (5 min.) IV. Review of Meeting Summary – All (2 min.) V. Staff Updates/Reports – (40 min.) 1) Hendricks Bridge Project Update 2) Facility Condition Assessment Update 3) Willamette Confluence Preserve Update 4) Parks Funding Task Force Update 5) North Jetty Update VI. Old Business – All (10 min.) 1) Action Plan Work Group VII. New Business – All (20 min.) 1) Park Maintenance Symposium 2) Volunteer Program Planned Activities VIII. Open – All (5 min.) IX. Operations Report – (5 min.) X. Meeting Wrap-up/Assignments – (5 min.) XI. Adjourn

2020 Meeting Dates: JANUARY 13 MAY 11 SEPTEMBER 14 FEBRUARY 10 JUNE 8 OCTOBER 12 MARCH 9 JULY NO MEETING NOVEMBER 9 APRIL 13 AUGUST NO MEETING DECEMBER 14

Lane County Parks Advisory

February 10, 2020 Meeting Summary

This written indexed summary of minutes is provided as a courtesy to the reader. The recorded minutes created pursuant to ORS 192.650(1) are the official minutes of this body under Oregon law.

The recorded minutes are available on the Parks Advisory Committee website:

http://www.lanecounty.org/Departments/PW/Parks/Pages/pac.aspx

Members Present: Kevin Shanley, Jim Mayo, Wayne Lemler, Greg Hyde, Carl Stiefbold, Mike Allen Members Absent: Ashley Adelman Staff Present: Brett Henry, Charlie Conrad, Michelle Hunt, Cynthia Schlegel, Tara King Guests Present: None

Co-Chair Jim Mayo filled in for Chair and called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.

00:00:06 Public Comment – None

00:00:10 Assignment Review – None

00:03:15 Review of January 2020 Meeting Summary - Approved as written; Shanley motioned, Allen seconded, motion passed unanimously.

00:03:45 Staff Updates/Reports - Review of Parks Funding Task Force Meeting – Henry gave an overview of the first Parks Funding Task Force Meeting stating 14 of the 15 members were in attendance. The County Administrator Steve Mokrohisky and Commissioner Heather Buck were also in attendance and both expressed their support for the Task Force. Henry gave a presentation on the parks system, a history of how the parks were funded, and the current budget structure. He also talked about the deferred maintenance backlog. Bob Keefer, who facilitated the meeting, led an exercise in ranking the top funding priorities for the Task Force to focus on. Routine maintenance and deferred maintenance ranked at the top of the list followed by conservation and revenue generation. Mayo reiterated Keefer does not want to leave anything out and wants the Task Force to be wide open in exploring all ideas. Henry stated the Funding Task Force includes three at large members and three members that represent different geographical zones. Lemler asked for clarification that Task Force meeting summaries are posted online and Henry responded they are and stated the next meeting is tentatively scheduled for March 9, 2020. - Armitage Campground Expansion – Henry met with Public Works’ Engineering & Construction Services Division to develop a site plan for the Armitage Campground expansion. Henry stated that the public was in favor of adding 15 additional full-hookup campsites. Currently, only the footprint has been identified and provided to the engineers to evaluate the site configuration. An

engineering services contract will develop a 70% design and at that point Parks will have a better cost estimate for the project. Funding for the project is $230K from the SDC for construction and $100K approved by the County Administrator for infrastructure improvements. Additionally, $100K is earmarked for the engineering design. Suggestions for obtaining additional funding include a loan and an OPRD County Opportunity grant. The engineers will explore connecting with city water and sewer. Henry stated importance of preserving existing trees to ensure site privacy and overall consistent character of the campground. Mayo questioned if it would be better to hook new campsites up to a sewer system. Shanley asked for clarification that the 15 proposed sites represent capacity. Henry stated it does and in a survey conducted it indicates residents do not want to see more than 20 new sites at the campground. Allen asked if Armitage had any hiker/biker sites and if any more were going to be made. Henry said there are currently no plans to add new tent sites but may consider moving the current tent sites to a more appropriate location in the campground.

00:18:44 Old Business - 2019 Accomplishments & 2020 Goals – Lemler stated more citizen input would be beneficial and that mentioning the Armitage Campground expansion plan may illicit more public response. He also suggested conducting open houses at the parks; highlighting one a year giving Parks an opportunity to pass out literature to educate the public about the parks system. Lemler also suggested offering an incentive for citizens to attend the open house. Shanley stated the benefits of having the Volunteer Coordinator position (Michelle Hunt) and all the important work she is doing with establishing a social media presence. - Mayo stated he spoke with the county’s Public Information Officer regarding the possibility of highlighting parks and advertising them more often to the press and she responded that there is no mechanism for controlling what gets published and it is up to the Register Guard to decide what is published. Henry stated he is in agreement that annual open houses would be worth looking in to. Allen stated he attended an emergency management training provided by Patience Winningham-Melcher, Lane County Public Works’ Emergency Manager and suggested working closely with Melcher to provide awareness to park users. Henry stated he has previously reached out to Melcher and sent a response out to PAC members. Allen reiterated he would like public emergency awareness to be part of the 2020 goals. - Action Plan Follow Up – Henry stated an Action Plan Workgroup was formed to guide the PAC in executing the Parks Master Plan. It is comprised of three PAC members as well as the Parks Division Manager. Meetings will be considered public and Henry will meet with the group to formulate a scoring/ranking system for the strategies in the Master Plan. Henry will work with Park staff while defining a methodology for the scoring system and bring input back to the PAC in a future meeting. Henry stated that these 2-year plans should be used to make sure the Master Plan is being implemented. Hyde stated he has been categorizing the master plan strategies according to which are distinct actions and ongoing programs or activities. He suggested the PAC re-read the Parks Master Plan every year and focus on the strategies and prioritize the strategies that are not ongoing activities. Henry will evaluate strategies with staff regarding cost and ensure strategies don’t get deprioritized due to high cost as they can be plugged in as funding is available. Lemler suggested Hyde give an in-service presentation. Hyde agreed to present only after the findings of the Action Plan Group meeting on March 2, 2020 was brought back to the PAC.

Page 2 of 5

00:34:57 New Business - 2019 Accomplishments & Goals - Maintenance Program – Tara King, representing Parks Maintenance, reported on the following 2019 accomplishments and 2020 goals:

Park Project Accomplishments For 2019  Snow storm cleanup joint effort between staff, stakeholders, contractors and volunteers. Volunteers really did a great job, we cannot thank them enough! Lane County Parks is the only agency that opened the season on time.  Re-Rocked and installed drainage system in the Baker Bay campground, after the major snowstorm. It is now better than it was before.  Maintenance staff renovated the concessions stand at Baker Bay. The wiring was updated, added new windows, sinks, countertops and installed a ductless heat pump.  Replaced both lift station sewage pumps at the Richardson marina.  Installed Wi-Fi at Richardson Marina and Campground.  We added 9 parking spots at Heceta Beach – we now have 25 parking spots in one of our most used coastal parks.  Rolled out Passport parking signage in parks with cell reception. From January 1, 2019 to January 1,2020 we had 4,120 transactions, with our highest usage months being July and August – with a combined total of 1,540  Installed credit card only fee machines at Heceta, Perkins Peninsula, Hendricks Bridge, Richardson Park and Baker Bay. This will hopefully eliminate costly break-ins and save staff time.  Installed a webcam at Mt. Pisgah.  At the North Jetty, Dan Anderson coordinated with Department of State Lands to make improvements to the parking lots. The maintenance crew also did vegetation removal and trail improvements.  Installed new Orchard Point day use sign due to an automobile accident.  Remodeled Orchard Point house.  Repaired the Orchard Point courtesy dock.  Installing metal roofs on the Camp Lane bathrooms. They are about 90% done.  We are renovating the Camp Lane Caretaker house.  Started a rodent removal program at Armitage.  Repaired both H & J shelters at Armitage Park  Dug out the Mapleton Boat ramp for the second year in a row. We can only remove 50 yards at a time. Todd thinks 1 more year and we will be good with the dig out.

Major goals for 2020  Assist Contractors with the Facilities Condition Assessment to document the condition and location of existing above and below ground infrastructure.  Build Harbor Vista Cabins, with all 3 being ADA accesssible.  Build the Armitage Shop.  Install a new caretaker home at Baker Bay.

- Conrad stated public feedback regarding the future of the North Jetty has been provided to the Board of Commissioners for review on considering whether or not to keep maintenance agreement in place or to consider a 30 year lease. Conrad also noted that if a lease was in place,

Page 3 of 5

24 hour access would have to be eliminated and a host would have to be put in place and a fee would have to be charged. - Lemler asked how the vendor search for the Facilities Condition Assessment Study was looking and Henry reported he is happy about what he has seen coming in thus far and was anticipating selecting a vendor in the next two months. - Allen inquired if Parks will allow dogs or smoking in the new cabins at Harbor Vista when they are completed. Henry stated all parks are non-smoking and consideration of pets has not been discussed at this point. - Stiefbold asked if the N. Trailhead at HBRA is complete yet. Henry responded only the planter boxes remain to be done.

00:46:50 New Business - Volunteer Program Planned Activities – Hunt reported she met with the Friends of Zumwalt regarding collaborative efforts and is participating in an upcoming event they are having. Recognizing how critical it is to get information regarding volunteer opportunities out to the public, Hunt Is working on social media outlets such as Instagram and Facebook to help get the word out and connect them to what Parks is doing. Additionally, Hunt is updating Parks’ website, giving each Park their own profile, making information more easily assessable, adding more photos of the parks, photos of park projects, and more links to affiliates. Hunt has created a flyer to hand out for volunteering and is in the process of creating a brochure. Shanley suggested adding Instagram to social media efforts. Hunt shared Parks’ hashtag is #lanecountyparks. Allen inquired about the posting process and Hunt stated all posts have to be approved through Lane County Parks before she would post them. Lemler asked if Hunt had made any contacts with schools. Hunt reported she has contacted Kalapuya High School and has an intern that will be working at Armitage Park in the spring. Hunt will be reaching out to more high schools over time and Lemler suggested reaching out to Lane Community College as well. Lemler also inquired if interns would be able to shadow Rangers in the field. Henry stated 95% of the Ranger’s work is maintenance and repair related. Lemler also suggested working with schools could be a possible pathway to grant funding.

01:03:04 Open - Emergency Management – Allen wants to hear input from Lane County’s Emergency Manager and the new Climate & Materials Project Manager Mike Nystrom and see how they interact, with an objective to provide park users with more information. - Trails & Open Space Mobile App – Shanley reported on a mobile application called OuterSpacial. This application is used to find and map trails and other open space activities. The application works similar to Google maps and allows for two way communication between the vendor and the user. Users can use the app for trail navigation, and also look up alerts and to alert others of hazards. Shanley suggested using GIS to provide our trail maps and use the service and offer it to the public, particularly at HBRA. He also suggested collaborating with HBRA, Cities, forest trails, BLM trails, and State Parks. Visit Bend is an umbrella sponsor. Henry stated the idea falls in line with Parks’ Facilities Condition Assessment as maintenance staff will go out in the going out in the field in real time to map infrastructure repairs. Hurley questioned if Travel Lane County would be interested and also Rivers to Ridges. Shanley stated he would send links. Mayo suggested adding the use of the OuterSpacial mobile application to the PAC goals. Lemler agreed and stated the importance of connectivity. - Allen followed up on volunteer trash collection and appropriate disposal. He asked if it was allowable for him to use a county park’s dumpster while collecting for SOLVE. Henry stated that

Page 4 of 5

would be appropriate because the volunteers wear safety vests while working which should help identify them as such.

01:17:33 Operations Report - Hyde stated he is appreciative of Ed Alverson’s efforts working on small grant applications as well as his partnership efforts with other agencies. Henry stated Alverson is also working on the Kinney Park restoration. Hyde stated he attended one of Alverson’ s educational workshops and found it very valuable and he encourages members to attend.

01:21:07 Meeting Wrap-up/Assignments - Henry will follow up with Action Plan Workgroup to establish scoring criteria/methodology for Master Plan implementation.

Adjourn – Meeting ended at 7:23 p.m.

The next meeting is scheduled for March 9, 2020.

Page 5 of 5

LANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BID TABULATION WORKSHEET ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $1,043,000.00 LOW BIDDER - DELTA CONSTRUCTION BIDDER #2 - Legacy Contracting BIDDER #3 - Knife River BIDDER #4 - Marcum & Sons BIDDER #5 - Deschutes BIDDER #6 - Cascade Civil BIDDER #7 - Brown Contracting PROJECT NAME: Launch Ramp & Parking Improvements; Hendricks Bridge Wayside; McKenzie River Hwy, Mile 24.1 CONTRACT NO: 19/20 - Parks BID DATE: February 25, 2020 - 2:00 P.M. STANDARD ITEM ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL % OVER/UND. % OVER/UND. ITEM % of UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL SPEC NO. NO. ENGR. EST. AVERAGE TOTAL BID GENERAL 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $93,090.00 $93,090.00 $19,284.00 $19,284.00 -79.28% #REF! 2.52% $72,335.00 $72,335.00 $31,455.00 $31,455.00 $90,272.00 $90,272.00 $65,457.00 $65,457.00 $102,200.00 $102,200.00 $186,000.00 $186,000.00 2 INSURANCE AND BONDING LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $7,360.00 $7,360.00 -63.20% #REF! 0.96% $21,985.00 $21,985.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $15,500.00 $15,500.00 $16,580.00 $16,580.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 3 MATERIALS TESTING & MONITORING LS 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,300.00 $6,300.00 5.00% #REF! 0.82% $7,650.00 $7,650.00 $4,900.00 $4,900.00 $5,820.00 $5,820.00 $5,526.00 $5,526.00 $28,200.00 $28,200.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 4 PROJECT LAYOUT & SURVEY VERIFICATION LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $22,970.00 $22,970.00 129.70% #REF! 3.00% $13,335.00 $13,335.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $10,944.00 $10,944.00 $18,249.00 $18,249.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 5 TREE REMOVAL & DISPOSAL LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $18,030.00 $18,030.00 -9.85% #REF! 2.35% $14,225.00 $14,225.00 $17,600.00 $17,600.00 $14,150.00 $14,150.00 $18,389.00 $18,389.00 $46,000.00 $46,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 6 ASPHALT/CONCRETE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL LS 1 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $10,094.00 $10,094.00 -57.94% #REF! 1.32% $17,235.00 $17,235.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $7,304.00 $7,304.00 $10,689.00 $10,689.00 $43,600.00 $43,600.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 7 SITE PREPARATION LS 1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $21,085.00 $21,085.00 163.56% #REF! 2.75% $15,335.00 $15,335.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $26,000.00 $26,000.00 $13,135.00 $13,135.00 $13,700.00 $13,700.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 8 SEDIMENTATION FENCE LF 970 $5.00 $4,850.00 $2.51 $2,434.70 -49.80% #REF! 0.32% $4.40 $4,268.00 $2.00 $1,940.00 $1.49 $1,445.30 $5.26 $5,102.20 $3.00 $2,910.00 $5.00 $4,850.00 9 FLOATING SILT CURTAIN LF 370 $25.00 $9,250.00 $39.60 $14,652.00 58.40% #REF! 1.91% $44.75 $16,557.50 $35.00 $12,950.00 $29.34 $10,855.80 $16.46 $6,090.20 $35.00 $12,950.00 $42.00 $15,540.00 LAUNCH RAMP IMPROVEMENTS 10 EXCAVATION - OFF SITE DISPOSAL CY 3150 $29.00 $91,350.00 $10.39 $32,728.50 -64.17% #REF! 4.27% $16.25 $51,187.50 $17.40 $54,810.00 $24.24 $76,356.00 $38.74 $122,031.00 $15.50 $48,825.00 $59.00 $185,850.00 11 EXCAVATION - STOCKPILE ON SITE CY 350 $18.00 $6,300.00 $6.19 $2,166.50 -65.61% #REF! 0.28% $12.70 $4,445.00 $9.10 $3,185.00 $11.10 $3,885.00 $16.83 $5,890.50 $17.50 $6,125.00 $52.00 $18,200.00 12 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC - SUBGRADE SF 1600 $0.25 $400.00 $0.22 $352.00 -12.00% #REF! 0.05% $0.35 $560.00 $0.27 $432.00 $0.17 $272.00 $0.25 $400.00 $0.35 $560.00 $2.00 $3,200.00 13 GEOTESXTILE FABRIC - RIPRAP SF 17000 $0.65 $11,050.00 $0.31 $5,270.00 -52.31% #REF! 0.69% $0.27 $4,590.00 $0.43 $7,310.00 $0.17 $2,890.00 $0.36 $6,120.00 $0.35 $5,950.00 $2.00 $34,000.00 14 AGGREGATE BASE TON 85 $35.00 $2,975.00 $45.96 $3,906.60 31.31% #REF! 0.51% $35.15 $2,987.75 $40.00 $3,400.00 $38.98 $3,313.30 $54.73 $4,652.05 $56.00 $4,760.00 $125.00 $10,625.00 15 AGGREGATE - OPEN GRADED TON 35 $55.00 $1,925.00 $46.53 $1,628.55 -15.40% #REF! 0.21% $36.20 $1,267.00 $76.00 $2,660.00 $115.27 $4,034.45 $77.66 $2,718.10 $68.00 $2,380.00 $130.00 $4,550.00 16 RIPRAP CLASS 2000 TON 3500 $65.00 $227,500.00 $46.66 $163,310.00 -28.22% #REF! 21.33% $50.25 $175,875.00 $52.00 $182,000.00 $41.17 $144,095.00 $56.60 $198,100.00 $62.00 $217,000.00 $85.00 $297,500.00 17 RIPRAP CLASS 700 TON 580 $45.00 $26,100.00 $44.76 $25,960.80 -0.53% #REF! 3.39% $48.00 $27,840.00 $52.00 $30,160.00 $47.25 $27,405.00 $53.89 $31,256.20 $62.00 $35,960.00 $95.00 $55,100.00 18 PLACE STOCKPILED RIVERBED MATERIAL CY 350 $15.00 $5,250.00 $12.81 $4,483.50 -14.60% #REF! 0.59% $13.95 $4,882.50 $35.00 $12,250.00 $16.65 $5,827.50 $21.44 $7,504.00 $40.00 $14,000.00 $45.00 $15,750.00 19 RAIL SYSTEM FOR PRECAST PLANKS LS 1 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $10,282.00 $10,282.00 14.24% #REF! 1.34% $6,100.00 $6,100.00 $7,300.00 $7,300.00 $9,496.00 $9,496.00 $10,220.00 $10,220.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 20 LAUNCH RAMP - PRECAST PLANKS SF 720 $25.00 $18,000.00 $26.31 $18,943.20 5.24% #REF! 2.47% $26.25 $18,900.00 $34.00 $24,480.00 $72.61 $52,279.20 $40.03 $28,821.60 $77.00 $55,440.00 $45.00 $32,400.00 21 LANUCH RAMP - CAST-IN-PLACE SF 860 $25.00 $21,500.00 $37.08 $31,888.80 48.32% #REF! 4.16% $26.75 $23,005.00 $34.00 $29,240.00 $36.99 $31,811.40 $32.12 $27,623.20 $38.00 $32,680.00 $59.00 $50,740.00 22 TIE OFF POSTS ALONG BANK EACH 5 $250.00 $1,250.00 $800.10 $4,000.50 220.04% #REF! 0.52% $625.00 $3,125.00 $1,700.00 $8,500.00 $250.00 $1,250.00 $283.00 $1,415.00 $220.00 $1,100.00 $1,500.00 $7,500.00 PARKING IMPROVEMENTS 23 EXCAVATION - OFF SITE DIPOSAL CY 3800 $24.00 $91,200.00 $8.62 $32,756.00 -64.08% #REF! 4.28% $17.85 $67,830.00 $17.00 $64,600.00 $22.32 $84,816.00 $35.23 $133,874.00 $15.50 $58,900.00 $45.00 $171,000.00 24 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC - SUBGRADE SF 38000 $0.15 $5,700.00 $0.09 $3,420.00 -40.00% #REF! 0.45% $0.15 $5,700.00 $0.12 $4,560.00 $0.10 $3,800.00 $0.24 $9,120.00 $0.25 $9,500.00 $0.50 $19,000.00 25 AGGREGATE BASE TON 2150 $35.00 $75,250.00 $15.98 $34,357.00 -54.34% #REF! 4.49% $21.95 $47,192.50 $23.00 $49,450.00 $22.70 $48,805.00 $37.10 $79,765.00 $23.00 $49,450.00 $45.00 $96,750.00 26 CONCRETE CURB - C-I-P - STANDARD LF 1420 $40.00 $56,800.00 $27.16 $38,567.20 -32.10% #REF! 5.04% $21.45 $30,459.00 $27.00 $38,340.00 $23.50 $33,370.00 $23.40 $33,228.00 $24.50 $34,790.00 $56.00 $79,520.00 27 STRUCTURAL STORMWATER PLANTER LF 290 $65.00 $18,850.00 $216.62 $62,819.80 233.26% #REF! 8.20% $114.50 $33,205.00 $150.00 $43,500.00 $223.30 $64,757.00 $139.38 $40,420.20 $105.00 $30,450.00 $105.00 $30,450.00 28 STORMWATER PLANTER STEEL SPILLWAYS EACH 5 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $681.87 $3,409.35 -31.81% #REF! 0.45% $671.00 $3,355.00 $2,500.00 $12,500.00 $588.40 $2,942.00 $803.80 $4,019.00 $950.00 $4,750.00 $1,800.00 $9,000.00 29 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE TON 700 $115.00 $80,500.00 $102.83 $71,981.00 -10.58% #REF! 9.40% $74.50 $52,150.00 $85.00 $59,500.00 $73.50 $51,450.00 $82.08 $57,456.00 $77.00 $53,900.00 $92.00 $64,400.00 30 CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND RAMP SF 1240 $16.00 $19,840.00 $16.18 $20,063.20 1.13% #REF! 2.62% $9.95 $12,338.00 $13.00 $16,120.00 $14.25 $17,670.00 $10.73 $13,305.20 $10.85 $13,454.00 $20.00 $24,800.00 31 CONCRETE STEPS SF 35 $100.00 $3,500.00 $135.72 $4,750.20 35.72% #REF! 0.62% $148.00 $5,180.00 $190.00 $6,650.00 $129.93 $4,547.55 $160.00 $5,600.00 $40.00 $1,400.00 $125.00 $4,375.00 32 HANDRAILS LF 100 $50.00 $5,000.00 $95.92 $9,592.00 91.84% #REF! 1.25% $86.50 $8,650.00 $144.00 $14,400.00 $75.40 $7,540.00 $92.20 $9,220.00 $88.00 $8,800.00 $120.00 $12,000.00 33 STORMWATER PIPE LF 80 $50.00 $4,000.00 $37.63 $3,010.40 -24.74% #REF! 0.39% $46.50 $3,720.00 $37.00 $2,960.00 $26.23 $2,098.40 $40.14 $3,211.20 $90.00 $7,200.00 $85.00 $6,800.00 34 TRENCH DRAIN LF 23 $150.00 $3,450.00 $165.43 $3,804.89 10.29% #REF! 0.50% $205.00 $4,715.00 $330.00 $7,590.00 $172.06 $3,957.38 $259.83 $5,976.09 $130.00 $2,990.00 $298.00 $6,854.00 35 IRRIGATION SYSTEM - COMPLETE LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $10,302.00 $10,302.00 -48.49% #REF! 1.35% $10,235.00 $10,235.00 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 $10,100.00 $10,100.00 $11,053.00 $11,053.00 $31,200.00 $31,200.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 36 GROWING MEDIUM CY 300 $60.00 $18,000.00 $60.64 $18,192.00 1.07% #REF! 2.38% $59.95 $17,985.00 $67.00 $20,100.00 $59.45 $17,835.00 $65.66 $19,698.00 $25.00 $7,500.00 $80.00 $24,000.00 37 SPILLWAY DRAIN ROCK TON 4 $30.00 $120.00 $84.66 $338.64 182.20% #REF! 0.04% $146.25 $585.00 $112.00 $448.00 $171.25 $685.00 $256.25 $1,025.00 $40.00 $160.00 $350.00 $1,400.00 38 PLANTINGS LS 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $11,154.00 $11,154.00 85.90% #REF! 1.46% $10,995.00 $10,995.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $13,132.00 $13,132.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 39 PAVEMENT STRIPING, SYMBOLS & TEXT - PAINTED LS 1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $4,590.00 $4,590.00 -42.63% #REF! 0.60% $4,735.00 $4,735.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,965.00 $4,965.00 $4,925.00 $4,925.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 40 SIGNS LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,552.00 $5,552.00 38.80% #REF! 0.73% $5,625.00 $5,625.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,443.00 $5,443.00 $5,388.00 $5,388.00 $800.00 $800.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00

TOTAL AMOUNT $1,043,000.00 $765,790.33 -26.58% $832,344.75 $839,090.00 $922,043.28 $1,049,079.74 $1,081,033.00 $1,856,154.00

Date: 3/6/2020 Page: 1 EXHIBIT A – SELECTION PROCEDURE AND SCORING

A.1 Selection Committee. The Selection Committee will be comprised of: Brett Henry, Parks Division Manager; Todd Bowen, Parks Maintenance Supervisor; and Charlie Conrad, Parks Supervising Analyst.

A.2 Evaluation Process. The selection process for this RFP will include the procedures identified here:  Will include evaluation and scoring of initial proposal

☒ May  Will Not (check one) include interviews of top-scored proposers

☒ May  Will Not (check one) include competitive negotiations with top-scored proposers

Notwithstanding the selection procedures identified above, the County reserves the right to terminate the evaluation process after completion of any procedural stage when, in the County's sole opinion, further evaluation procedures are not required for the County to identify the proposer whose offer will best suit the interests of the County.

A.3 Proposal Scoring. The County will score proposals according to the following criteria: Criterion Points (a) Please describe in detail your process for creating an inventory and assessment of subsurface infrastructure at our facilities (25 points). (b) Please illustrate your project schedule in a Gantt Chart or PERT chart format outlining key milestones and deliverables which allows us to clearly assess how tasks overlap over the duration of the Facilities Condition Assessment (25 points). (c) Please provide a fee-based proposal to provide the services you have outlined in response to the Scope of Services. The fees shall be broken down by field and office tasks, and shall include, at a minimum (25 points): • The number of staff assigned to the Project, along with their job titles. • The number of anticipated hours each task will take to complete; by job title. • A list of hourly rates by job title. • Not-to-exceed out-of-pocket expenses and any administrative overhead. • A not-to-exceed contract amount, including all expenses. (d) Please describe how you will minimize the disruption of county staff time while gathering data for the assessment during our busiest months stretching from February through September (25 points).

A.4 RESERVED

A.5 Oral Interviews. Proposers may be required to participate in an oral interview. Not all Proposers will be asked to interview. The oral interview will be a panel comprised of members of the selection committee.

Proposers may only ask questions that are intended to clarify the questions that they are asked to respond. Each Proposer’s time slot for oral interviews will be determined randomly. Proposers who are selected shall make every effort to attend. If representatives of the County experience difficulty on the part of any Proposer in scheduling a time for the oral interview, it may result in disqualification from further consideration.

RFP template – electronic proposals, rev. 07/01/2019 7

Lane County Parks Division Facilities Condition Assessment Request for Proposals (for Electronic Submission) Lane County, Oregon

2 March 2020

Contents

Chapter Page (a) Please describe in detail your process for creating an inventory and assessment of sub-surface infrastructure at our facilities. 5 (b) Please illustrate your project schedule in a Gantt Chart or PERT chart format outlining key milestones and deliverables which allows us to clearly assess how tasks overlap over the duration of the Facilities Condition Assessment. 6 (c) Please provide a fee-based proposal to provide the services you have outlined in response to the Scope of Services. The fees shall be broken down by field and office tasks, and shall include, at a minimum: 7 > The number of staff assigned to the Project, along with their job titles. 7 > The number of anticipated hours each task will take to complete; by job title. 7 > A list of hourly rates by job title. 7 > Not-to-exceed out-of-pocket expenses and any administrative overhead. 7 > A not-to-exceed contract amount, including all expenses. 7 (d) Please describe how you will minimize the disruption of county staff time while gathering data for the assessment during our busiest months stretching from February through September. 7

Appendices ...... 8 Appendix A. Gantt Chart Schedule 9 Appendix B. Fees 10

Notice

This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely as information for Lane County, Oregon and use in relation to Facilities Condition Assessment Request for Proposals. Faithful+Gould, Inc. assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents.

Proposal Verification Item Name Initials Date Confirm fee has been verified Dean Leonard DL 2.28.2020 Anna Benicta / Technical (spell, language, format) AB / EU 2.28.2020 Evi Unterthiner Bid Manager / Executive Signoff Dean Leonard DL 2.28.2020

Faithful+Gould | RFP – Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Page 2 of 11

EXHIBIT B - PROPOSER'S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS

Proposer's Name: Faithful+Gould, Inc.

RFP Title: Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Contract LCPFCA001

PROPOSER'S STATEMENTS Proposer's Offer. Proposer offers to provide the required services in accordance with the requirements of the Request for Proposals (RFP) stated above and the enclosed proposal. The undersigned Proposer declares that the Proposer has carefully examined the above-named Request for Proposals, and that, if this proposal is accepted, Proposer will execute a contract with the County to furnish the services of the proposal submitted with this form. Proposer attests that the information provided is true and accurate to the best of the personal knowledge of the person signing this proposal, and that the person signing has the authority to represent the individual or organization in whose name this proposal is submitted. Proposer's Acceptance of Terms and Conditions. By execution of this Form, the undersigned Proposer accepts all terms and conditions of this Request for Proposals except as modified in writing in its proposal. Proposer agrees that the offer made in this proposal will remain irrevocable for a period of 60 days from the date proposals are due. Proposer's Acknowledgement of Public Records Law. By execution of this Form, the undersigned Proposer acknowledges that its entire proposal is subject to Oregon Public Records Law (ORS 192.410–192.505), and may be disclosed in its entirety to any person or organization making a records request, except for such information as may be exempt from disclosure under the law. Proposer agrees that all information included in this proposal that is claimed to be exempt from disclosure has been clearly identified either in the Proposer's Statement, or in an itemization attached hereto. Proposer further acknowledges its responsibility to defend and indemnify the County for any costs associated with establishing a claimed exemption.

ADDENDA Proposer has received and considered, in the accompanying proposal, the terms of the following addenda, if any: Addenda 1, 2, 3

CERTIFICATIONS By signing this Proposer's Certification form, Proposer certifies that: 1. Certification of Resident Bidder Status. Proposer is X is not (check one) a resident bidder, as defined in ORS 279A.120. 2. Certification of Non-Discrimination. Proposer has not discriminated and will not discriminate against a subcontractor in awarding a subcontract because the subcontractor is a disadvantaged business enterprise, minority-owned business, woman-owned business, a business that a service-disabled veteran owns, or an emerging small business that is certified under ORS 200.055. 3. Certification of Non-Collusion. This proposal is made without connection or agreement with any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity making a proposal for the same services and is in all respects fair and free from collusion or collaboration with any other proposer.

Faithful+Gould | RFP – Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Page 3 of 11

4. Certification of Compliance with Tax Laws. Proposer has, to the best of Proposer's knowledge, complied with Oregon tax laws in the period prior to the submission of this proposal, including: a. All tax laws of the State of Oregon, including but not limited to ORS 305.620 and ORS chapters 316, 317, and 318, b. Any tax provisions imposed by a political subdivision of this state that applied to Proposer or its property, goods, services, operations, receipts, income, performance of or compensation for any work performed, and c. Any rules, regulations, charter provisions, or ordinances that implemented or enforced any of the foregoing tax laws or provisions.

The undersigned, by signature here, acknowledges, accepts, and certifies to the Proposer's Statements and Certifications as stated above.

PROPOSER

Faithful+Gould, Inc. Authorized signature Proposer’s legal name

Dean Leonard, BSc (Hons), MRICS, ACIOB 12725 SW Millikan Way, Suite 230 Name of authorized signer Address

Vice President, Strategic Facility Consulting Beaverton, OR 97005 Title

February 28, 2019 41-1797617 Date Federal Tax ID number

OPTIONAL CONTACT INFORMATION REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL

Contact name

Telephone number

Email address

Faithful+Gould | RFP – Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Page 4 of 11

(a) Please describe in detail your process for creating an inventory and assessment of sub-surface infrastructure at our facilities.

Below-Grade Infrastructure Utilities and Tanks Faithful+Gould has extensive experience with below-grade infrastructure. Over the last three years we have been assessing and GIS mapping the State of Utah’s below grade infrastructure including all the State park facilities. We have teamed with a best in class below grade infrastructure assessment and GIS mapping company called Professional Pipe Services, Inc (Pro-Pipe) providing high-tech methodology and equipment to provide Lane county with the best results. Pro-Pipe will utilize Digital Pipeline Scanning using the IBAK Panoramo 3D Optoscanner. This increases the efficiency of CCTV Pipeline Inspection by incorporating the use of two high-resolution digital cameras in the front and rear sections of the housing, with 185° wide-angle lenses, with parallel-mounted xenon flashlights capable of 360° spherical images, enabling the analysis independent of the field inspection. Methodology The Pro-Pipe Panoramo system captures 100% of the entire pipeline interior (360) in less time than conventional video recordation with 6X the digital clarity (high definition) and is delivered with a virtual 3D reader that enables the reviewer or customer to see, in greater detail, 100% of the pipe interior from any angle (you can pan / tilt anywhere, anytime). The flat-view component of the reader enables the pipe interior to be reviewed in a plan view layout with the ability to perform accurate measurements. Pro-Pipe utilizes Pipelogix Software (flexi-data) for all coding, reporting and 360-viewers. 360 - High Definition Manhole Inspections are excellent for design-accurate manhole invert measuring with 3-D virtual video of the entire manhole and delivered via GIS integrated data files. The IBAK Panoramo Si enables Pro-Pipe to perform complete optical condition assessment of manholes with high efficiency. Pro-Pipe uses MACP Certified personnel for all manhole inspections. The Si has the ability to scan a manhole within a 1- minute period, capturing 100% of the entire manhole cavity for review in a virtual 3D reader, which can be utilized in flat-view for measuring inverts, defects, etc. and can be exported as a point cloud to Autocad. There are various methods of assessing the condition and lifecycle of below grade utilities which vary substantially in effort and cost. Faithful+Gould can assist the client in selecting the most appropriate option for the County park facilities. CCTV Lateral Launch and Cross Bore Prevention Pro-Pipe operates a fleet of CCTV Lateral Launch systems allowing for both a mainline inspection and a lateral inspection by the launch of a camera from the robotic transporter up a lateral, extending up to 100 feet. The lateral launcher has been instrumental for inspecting sewer service laterals where directional drilling is scheduled to install crossing utility lines and where past drilled utilities (gas / telecommunication) may have penetrated the lateral. Pro-Pipe is currently engaged for providing such lateral inspections for Sempra

Faithful+Gould | RFP – Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Page 5 of 11

Utilities, Pacific Gas & Electric and Southwest Gas Corporation. The launching camera has a transmitter which can be tracked on the surface via a sonde enabling the location and depth of a lateral line to be marked on the surface. Reporting/ GIS Mapping The visual resolution is substantially improved over traditional CCTV. The video file is a free viewer that allows the end user to virtually pan and tilt anywhere inside the pipe. The flat view enables a true comprehensive view at 3,000 lines of vertical resolution and contains an accurate measuring tool. Below is a sample snapshot from PIPELOGIX utilized in the data capture and deliverable. Manhole inspections will be conducted with the same technology (IBAK Panoramo & PIPELOGIX software). The true-digital manhole inspection system is excellent for design-accurate manhole invert measuring with 3-D virtual video of the entire manhole and delivered via GIS integrated data files. The Si has the ability to scan a manhole within a 1-minute period, capturing 100% of the entire manhole cavity for review in a virtual 3D reader, which can be utilized in flat- view for measuring inverts, defects, etc. and can be exported as a point cloud to Autocad. The data is incorporated into GIS the same as the mainline inspection along with NASSCO MACP Level-2 condition reports by MACP certified personnel. GIS Data Integration With thousands of feet of video to review, Pro-Pipe will integrate both high-definition scans and conventional CCTV recorded observations directly to your GIS program enabling you to select which observation layer to geographically view and query quantities for instant decision making. Pro-Pipe routinely integrates the accurate locations of connections, observations, defects and pipe ratings into a GIS database during inspection and can deliver via shape files or geo-databases. The data can include pipe slopes, invert elevations and any other specified information to eliminate thousands of hours spent sorting, reviewing and prioritizing critical pipeline data. Water and Irrigation Lines Faithful+Gould will review any available record drawings for the services at each location. We will meet with facility staff to provide a history of maintenance and repairs and ongoing deficiencies with the water lines and systems. We will conduct visual condition assessments where accessible of the water lines and connecting pipe material. Based on the estimated year of install and the industry standard estimated useful life and visual observation / history, we will develop an estimate of remaining useful life of the water lines and irrigation systems and provide capital expenditure recommendations. (b) Please illustrate your project schedule in a Gantt Chart or PERT chart format outlining key milestones and deliverables which allows us to clearly assess how tasks overlap over the duration of the Facilities Condition Assessment.

In Appendix A we have outlined our draft Gantt Chart schedule including all major tasks and milestones over a four-month contract period.

Faithful+Gould | RFP – Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Page 6 of 11

(c) Please provide a fee-based proposal to provide the services you have outlined in response to the Scope of Services. The fees shall be broken down by field and office tasks, and shall include, at a minimum: > The number of staff assigned to the Project, along with their job titles. > The number of anticipated hours each task will take to complete; by job title. > A list of hourly rates by job title. > Not-to-exceed out-of-pocket expenses and any administrative overhead. > A not-to-exceed contract amount, including all expenses.

Below is our team assigned to this project.

In Appendix B, we provide a full break down of our not-to-exceed out-of-pocket expenses fees including rates against each task per building.

(d) Please describe how you will minimize the disruption of county staff time while gathering data for the assessment during our busiest months stretching from February through September.

The Faithful+Gould team is experienced in performing assessments with minimal supervision. We do, however, encourage a collaborative approach to the assessment program. During the project planning phase, we will meet with facility staff to collaborate with maintenance staff to understand the history of maintenance at each facility and discuss any issues associated with them. This will provide an essential download of historic information to the assessment team prior to the physical site assessment. We will conduct the site assessment un escorted with assistance, as necessary, to access locked buildings and the roof. We understand that various issues arise working in occupied environments together with the need to minimise the disruption of agency maintenance staff. Faithful+Gould staff routinely work in occupied environments. We understand how to plan work needs around occupants to minimize disruption and to maintain a safe and orderly environment. We also understand the critical importance of well-integrated and timely communication and project planning prior to commencing site assessments. We will perform a management overview function throughout the assess-management process for activities to meet commitments and the needs of Lane County Parks. To ensure quality in the deliverable, we will utilize strict quality standards developed by International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in accordance with our ISO 9001 quality assurance practice.

Faithful+Gould | RFP – Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Page 7 of 11

Appendices

Faithful+Gould | RFP – Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Page 8 of 11

Appendix A. Gantt Chart Schedule

Faithful+Gould | RFP – Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Page 9 of 11

Lane County Parks Facility Condition Assessment ID Task Name Duration Start Finish April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 22252831 3 6 9 12151821242730 3 6 9 12151821242730 2 5 8 11141720232629 2 5 8 11141720232629 1 4 7 1013161922252831 3 6 9 121518 1 Lane County Facility Condition Assessment 95 days Mon 4/20/20 Fri 8/28/20

2 Project Planning 10 days Mon 4/20/20 Mon 5/4/20

3 Contract Signing 0 days Mon 4/20/20Mon 4/20/20 4/20

4 Assessment Planning 7 days Mon 4/20/20Tue 4/28/20

5 Client Kick Off Meeting 0 days Mon 5/4/20 Mon 5/4/20 5/4

6 Phase One 36 days Mon 5/4/20Mon 6/22/20

7 Site assessment 1 5 days Mon 5/4/20 Fri 5/8/20

8 Report Generation Period 1 20 days Mon 5/11/20 Fri 6/5/20

9 Data Analysis 3 days Mon 5/11/20Wed 5/13/20

10 Report Generation 15 days Mon 5/11/20 Fri 5/29/20

11 QC 5 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 6/5/20

12 Review and Comment Period 11 days Mon 6/8/20Mon 6/22/20

13 Client Review Period 8 days Mon 6/8/20Wed 6/17/20

14 Complete report revisions and issue final reports 3 days Thu 6/18/20Mon 6/22/20

15 Phase Two 36 days Mon 6/1/20Mon 7/20/20

16 Site Assessment 2 5 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 6/5/20

17 Report Generation Period 2 20 days Mon 6/8/20 Fri 7/3/20

18 Data Analysis 3 days Mon 6/8/20Wed 6/10/20

19 Report Generation 15 days Mon 6/8/20 Fri 6/26/20

20 QC 5 days Mon 6/29/20 Fri 7/3/20

21 Review and Comment Period 11 days Mon 7/6/20Mon 7/20/20

22 Client Review Period 8 days Mon 7/6/20Wed 7/15/20

23 Complete report revisions and issue final reports 3 days Thu 7/16/20Mon 7/20/20

24 Phase Three 36 days Mon 6/29/20Mon 8/17/20

25 Site Assessment 3 5 days Mon 6/29/20 Fri 7/3/20

Task Project Summary Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Split External Tasks Manual Task Start-only Progress Milestone External Milestone Duration-only Finish-only Deadline Summary Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks

Revised Fri 2/28/20 Page 1 Lane County Parks Facility Condition Assessment ID Task Name Duration Start Finish April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 22252831 3 6 9 12151821242730 3 6 9 12151821242730 2 5 8 11141720232629 2 5 8 11141720232629 1 4 7 1013161922252831 3 6 9 121518 26 Report Generation Period 3 20 days Mon 7/6/20 Fri 7/31/20

27 Data Analysis 3 days Mon 7/6/20 Wed 7/8/20

28 Report Generation 15 days Mon 7/6/20 Fri 7/24/20

29 QC 5 days Mon 7/27/20 Fri 7/31/20

30 Review and Comment Period 11 days Mon 8/3/20Mon 8/17/20

31 Client Review Period 8 days Mon 8/3/20Wed 8/12/20

32 Complete report revisions and issue final reports 3 days Thu 8/13/20Mon 8/17/20

33 Phase Four 25 days Mon 7/27/20 Fri 8/28/20

34 Site assessment 4 5 days Mon 7/27/20 Fri 7/31/20

35 Report Generation Period 4 20 days Mon 8/3/20 Fri 8/28/20

36 Data Analysis 3 days Mon 8/3/20 Wed 8/5/20

37 Report Generation 15 days Mon 8/3/20 Fri 8/21/20

38 QC 5 days Mon 8/24/20 Fri 8/28/20

39 Review and Comment Period 11 days Mon 8/31/20Mon 9/14/20

40 Client Review Period 8 days Mon 8/31/20 Wed 9/9/20

41 Complete report revisions and issue final reports 3 days Thu 9/10/20Mon 9/14/20

42 Presentation of Results/Close out meeting 1 day? Tue 9/15/20 Tue 9/15/20

Revised Fri 2/28/20 Page 2

Appendix B. Fees

Faithful+Gould | RFP – Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Page 10 of 11

Lane County Assessments

Picknic areas,with utilities boat ramp, trailer parking, sports courts, horseshoe pits and dog park. 310 3 1 8 16 2 1 28 $135 $135 $145 $3,790 $21,285 $25,075 parking spaces 38 site camp ground with RV hookup Armitage 7.1 restroom and shower, laundry. Park trail he U.S. Army Corps of Engineers leases Baker Bay to Lane County. The park includes a 53 site campground, playground, 27 slip marina with accommodations for some dry moorage, designated swimming area, boat ramp, two large group day use facilities with 6 1 16 32 2 1 52 $135 $135 $145 $7,030 $43,280 $50,310 electricity and water features, and a concession building with connected caretaker residence that sells food and offers watercraft rentals. Baker Bay has Baker Bay 80.4 Theparking park for has 183 five cars different and 51 trailheads car/trailer. for Campground the public to access the trail system: at Trail 1, at the North Trailhead (Trail 3/7), at Trail 38, at the East Trailhead (Trail 2), and at Trail 5. The main parking lot is compacted gravel and has parking for 437 cars and 70 car\trailers and provides parking/access for Trail 1 and Trail 5. There is a flushing restroom available at this trailhead. There are also picnic areas, Mt. Pisgah Arboretum Visitors Center, and Mt. Pisgah Arboretum’s administrative offices. HBRA offers 28 miles of multiuse pathways and trails which provide recreational opportunities for hikers and equestrians within the park. The park also features the Mt. Pisgah Arboretum which is a 209 leased area that includes some of the last remaining, sizable contiguous native 3 1 16 32 2 1 52 $135 $135 $145 $7,030 $7,030 oak savanna prairie in Lane County. The White Oak Pavilion and its corresponding amenities: namely; 6 space parking lot, flushing restroom, dressing room, paved outdoor porches, and storage area is managed by The Mount Pisgah Arboretum (MPA) and located in their leased area of the park. An old silo and Quonset hut are also located in the MPA leased area. The park has many historical attributes such as the Seavey-Kienzle homestead farmhouse and barn within the park boundaries. In addition the park includes a horse arena managed by the Sheriff’s Mounted Posse for practicing and hosting regional Howard Buford Recreation Area2212 (HBRA)equestrian events. Lane County Assessments

This park offers paved parking for 437 cars and 70 car/trailers. The primary feature of the park is the access it provides to Fern Ridge Reservoir. The park offers a large marina with 160 slips, two unsupervised swimming areas, paved motorized boat ramp, courtesy dock, sail hoist system, three flushing 3 1 16 24 2 1 44 $135 $135 $145 $5,950 $19,057 $25,007 restrooms, concessions building, caretaker residence, marina host site and marina building, park host site, multiple group picnic areas with grills, a playground, volleyball courts, horseshoe pits, footbridge, picnic shelter, lakefront paved pathways, and public art displays. This park also provides a staff maintenance yard and maintenance building. This park is Orchard Point 57.7 identified to accommodate large events.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers leases Perkins Peninsula to Lane County. This park offers paved parking for 129 cars and 32 car/trailers and two flushing restrooms. The primary feature of this park is 3 1 8 16 2 1 28 $135 $135 $145 $3,790 $9,900 $13,690 access to Fern Ridge Reservoir. The park has a boat ramp, courtesy dock, and a designated swimming area, multiple picnic areas with grills, a baseball field, 0.5 miles of paved lakefront pathways, forested Perkins Peninsula 41.6 areas, and open space

This park offers paved parking for 572 cars and 85 car/trailers. The primary features of the park include access to Fern Ridge Reservoir, an 88-site RV campground, 212 slip marina, and large day use areas. The park also offers two paved motorized boat ramps, two courtesy docks, a sail hoist system, and an unsupervised swimming area. The park has multiple picnic sites with grills, three picnic shelters with two 3 1 16 24 2 1 44 $135 $135 $145 $5,950 $42,130 $48,080 of those shelters offering a full-service outdoor kitchen, three playgrounds, volleyball courts, and amphitheater. The park has three flushing restrooms in the day use area, one of which offers showers, and a sanitation sewage lagoon. There are also two full service restrooms/showers in the campground, a caretaker residence, and park office. A 400 amp electrical service is available to power a stage or Richardson 114.8 other equipment suitable for events. Lane County Assessments

This park offers paved parking for 26 cars, a portable restroom, picnic areas with grills, open space, an oak tree on the Oregon Travel Experience Heritage Tree 3 1 4 16 2 1 24 $135 $135 $145 $3,250 $3,250 registry, and pedestrian access to Fern Ridge Reservoir and lake beach area. The majority of maintenance at this park is performed by the Friends Zumwalt 58 of Zumwalt Park. - Blue Mountain Park is the largest Lane County Park in the Coast Fork of the Willamette watershed. It includes picnic tables, 0.8 miles of hiking trails and 6 1 4 8 2 1 16 $135 $135 $145 $2,170 $2,170 access to Mosby Creek. The park is otherwise Blue Mountain 242.8 undeveloped.

This park has a gate at the entrance and only permits park users to walk in. This park does not have any official trails or pathways, but there are very distinct 3 1 4 8 2 1 16 $135 $135 $145 $2,170 $2,170 trails that are used by the public to access different areas within the park. The park features man side channels and ponds that were once actively Hileman 45.4 connected to the Willamette River. Water Access Park - parking lot; restroom; picnic area, and Paved boat 1 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Ada 33 ramp Provides non-motorized boat access to the Siuslaw River at the confluence of the Siuslaw River and Wildcat Creek. Gravel parking is limited to a 2 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 maximum of ten cars. A portable restroom is Austa Boat Ramp 0.5 maintained onsite. his park offers access to the lower McKenzie River by a concrete boat ramp. Parking for 4 cars or 3 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Bellinger Landing 0.6 car/trailer and a single vault restroom

his park offers parking for 3 cars and 11 car/trailer spaces. Designated ADA parking spaces are available 1 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $734 $2,634 and an ADA restroom. There are picnic tables with grills, and a fishing platform. A paved boat ramp Bender Landing 0.5 provides access to the North Fork of the Siuslaw River

This park offers a gravel parking lot for 2 car/trailer 3 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Deadmonds Ferry Landing 0.1 and a boat slide to access the McKenzie River

This park offers gravel parking for 4 car/trailers. There 2 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 is a portable restroom onsite, picnic areas and a non- Deadwood Landing 0.5 motorized gravel boat ramp. Lane County Assessments

This park offers a picnic area non-motorized boaters and other park users on the McKenzie River. The park offers parking for 6 gravel parking spaces and 1 4 1 4 8 2 1 16 $135 $135 $145 $2,170 $2,170 portable restroom, a developed park host site (electricity, water, sewer), a covered garage area, and Eagle Rock 13.3 horseshoe pits. This park offers paved parking for 7 cars and 10 car/trailers and is a designated roadside safety rest area. This park also has a picnic area with grills, an 2 1 4 8 2 1 16 $135 $135 $145 $2,170 $2,170 ADA restroom, and a non-motorized boat slide for Farnham Landing 0.7 access to the Siuslaw River. This park offers gravel parking for 10 car/trailers at the 1.9 acre park, is a designated roadside safety rest 4 1 4 8 2 1 16 $135 $135 $145 $2,170 $2,170 area, includes three boat ramps, and a restroom Forest Glen Landing 1.9 facility. This park offers paved parking for 4 cars and 4 car/trailers, a single vault restroom, a paved boat 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Greenwood Landing 0.4 ramp, and interpretive signage. This park offers parking for 3 car/trailer, a portable restroom and two gravel boat ramps that provide 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Hamlin 0.2 access to the McKenzie River. This park has paved parking for 27 cars and is a designated roadside safety rest area. The park has a 1 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 picnic area, double vault restroom, and offers access Heceta Beach 2.8 to the beach.

This park offers paved parking for 3 cars and 10 car/trailers, interpretive signage, and a double vault 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 restroom. The primary feature of the park is the two Helfrich Landing 1 boat ramps providing access to the McKenzie River. This park offers paved parking for 10 cars and 6 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Lasells Stewart 14 pedestrian access to the Row River This park offers gravel parking and a portable restroom. The main feature of this park is access to 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 the McKenzie River below Leaburg dam via the boat Leaburg Dam Boat Slide 0.1 slide.

This park offers parking 6 cars and a portable 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 restroom. The main feature of the park is access to Leaburg Landing 0.5 the McKenzie River and a gravel boat ramp.

This park offers parking for 15 cars and 2 car/trailers and is a designated roadside safety rest area. The 2 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $917 $2,817 parks primary features are a picnic area with grills, a double vault and a non-motorized boat ramp that Linslaw 26.9 provides access to the Siuslaw River.

This park offers gravel parking for 40 car/trailers and a double vault restroom. The main feature of this 2 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 park is the paved motorized boat ramp that provides Mapleton Landing 1.8 access to the Siuslaw River. Lane County Assessments

Site FCA QC Assessor F+G net Below Grade Region Travel PM Total Hrs QC Rate PM Rate Total Fee Assessment Report Report Rate fee Infrastructure Name Acres Notes Lane County Parks (Owned or Leased) Regional Parks This park offers parking for 10 car/trailers, and an ADA single vault restroom. The main feature of the 1 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 park is the paved motorized boat ramp that provides Mercer Lake Landing 1 access to Mercer Lake This park offers paved parking for 20 cars and 7 car/trailers and a portable restroom The main feature of this park is the paved motorized boat ramp that 1 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 provides the public access to Munsel Lake and a Munsel Lake Landing 1.8 courtesy dock.

This park offers parking for 6 cars and 9 car/trailers and a single vault restroom. The primary feature of 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 the park is the motorized boat ramp that provides Rodakowski Landing 0.5 access to the McKenzie River.

This park offers paved parking for 4 cars 2 car/trailers and is a designated roadside safety rest area. The 2 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Park has a portable restroom and picnic areas. The park’s main feature is a non-motorized boat ramp Schindler Landing 0.3 that provides water access to Lake Creek.

This park offers gravel parking for 2 cars and 8 car/trailers and is a designated roadside safety rest area. The park also has a double vault restroom and 2 1 4 8 2 1 16 $135 $135 $145 $2,170 $2,170 a picnic area with grills. The main feature of the park is the paved non-motorized boat ramp that provides Tide Wayside 1.8 access to the Siuslaw River. This park offers access to the Siuslaw River by a concrete boat ramp and parking for four cars and 2 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Tiernan Boat Ramp 2 twelve car/trailer on a gravel parking lot.

This park offers parking for 3 cars and 20 car/trailers and is a designated roadside safety rest area. The park features a double vault restroom, picnic areas 2 1 3 8 2 1 15 $135 $135 $145 $2,035 $2,035 with grills, a paved motorized boat ramp, and a courtesy dock. An additional courtesy dock was removed in 2013. The primary feature of the park is Triangle Lake 0.6 water access to Triangle Lake. This park offers paved parking for 4 cars and 35 car/trailers, a double vault restroom, picnic areas with grills, a paved motorized boat ramp, courtesy 1 1 3 8 2 1 15 $135 $135 $145 $2,035 $2,035 dock and fishing pier, and interpretive signage. The primary feature of the park is water access to Siltcoos Westlake 1.3 Lake. This park offers paved parking for 20 cars and a single vault restroom. The Park features picnic areas and a 3 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 paved motorized boat ramp that provides access to Whitely 1.4 the Willamette River. This park offers gravel parking for 6 cars and a portable restroom The parks primary features are the 6 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 picnic area with grills and access to Row River and Wildwood Falls 3.4 Wildwood Falls. Lane County Assessments

Site FCA QC Assessor F+G net Below Grade Region Travel PM Total Hrs QC Rate PM Rate Total Fee Assessment Report Report Rate fee Infrastructure Name Acres Notes Lane County Parks (Owned or Leased) Regional Parks Special Use Park - Archie Knowles 4.5 RV Hookup, parking, restroom 9 campsites 2 1 4 16 2 1 24 $135 $135 $145 $3,250 $734 $3,984 This park offers parking for 5 cars, a 0.7 mile hiking 6 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Bohemia Saddle 12.4 trail and historic goldmine

The lodge has a commercial kitchen, a 160 person capacity dining hall and a large fireplace. There is a two story A-frame building that has dormitory style sleeping quarters upstairs which sleeps approximately 20-25 people, plus a fireside room, nurse’s room, and restrooms. Camp Lane also has two Adirondacks shelters that are three-sided shelters with portable bed frames and sleep approximately 15-18 people in each. Five tree houses 2 1 16 24 2 1 44 $135 $135 $145 $5,950 $8,426 $14,376 offer sleeping accommodations for up to seven people each, or 35 total people. A yurt is also available onsite and can provide sleeping accommodations for 12 people. There are two large restroom facilities that also provide warm showers and heated dressing rooms. Camp Lane includes a variety of recreational facilities including a large covered multi-use court, outdoor amphitheater, volleyball court, horseshoe pits (3 regulation pits), tetherball, open fields, swimming in the river, multiple fire rings for camp fires, and open fields. The Camp Lane 15.6 facility has parking for up to 52 vehicles.

Currin Covered Bridge offers parking for 10 cars and 6 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Currin Covered Bridge 1 pedestrian access to this historic structure This park offers paved parking for 14 cars and is a designated roadside safety rest area. The park 6 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 includes a double vault restroom and vehicle access Dorena Covered Bridge 1.1 across Dorena Covered Bridge. This park offers gravel parking for 15 cars, a portable restroom available picnic tables with grills, horseshoe 6 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Fall Creek pits, and riverfront access. This park offers gravel parking for 8 car/trailers and a 6 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Finn Rock boat ramp. Lane County Assessments

This park offers year-round camping with 38 RV sites (electricity and water, with a dump station) and a small day use area featuring swings, an open field, a webcam directed towards mouth of Siuslaw River, and a viewing platform for the mouth of the Siuslaw River and Pacific Ocean. This park offers paved parking for 20 cars. The restroom facilities are ADA 1 1 8 16 2 1 28 $135 $135 $145 $3,790 $3,790 accessible and include an ADA shower facility. Park structures include a caretaker residence and full hookup host site (electricity, water, sewer). A day use paved parking lot located at the entrance of the park provides ocean views. Direct pedestrian access to the Siuslaw River is provided through a long-term lease agreement with the An Army Corps of Harbor Vista 14.2 Engineers. This park offers gravel parking for 4 cars, picnic tables, and a short 0.1 mile hiking trail along the 3 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Howard J. Morton 14.9 McKenzie River.

This park offers paved parking for 28 cars. The park has an ADA restroom and picnic areas. The main feature of this park is the Lowell Covered Bridge itself 5 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 and the Interpretive Center that provides interpretive signs about covered bridges, area history and Lowell Covered Bridge 1.6 attractions. There is a 0.2 mile ADA paved pathway.

This park features paved parking for 17 cars and 4 oversized parking spaces and is a designated roadside safety rest area. There is a portable restroom in the parking lot. This park’s main features are the visitor’s 4 1 4 16 2 1 24 $135 $135 $145 $3,250 $2,200 $5,450 center, a 0.2 mile paved trail leading around the old hatchery’s main pond, viewing platforms, a caretaker’s house, hatchery building, and storage Old McKenzie Hatchery 45.2 facilities. This parking lot and restroom area of this park is owned and operated by the United States Forest Service (USFS). The dock is owned by Lane County with access and maintenance standards managed 1 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 through agreement. This park offers paved parking for 15 cars and a double vault restroom (not county assets). The dock is primarily used for fishing and Rock Dock 0.7 crabbing. This park offers gravel parking for 10 cars. The primary feature of this park is access and to view the 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Stewart Covered Bridge 0.1 historic Stewart Covered Bridge. Local Park - Lane County Assessments

This park offers parking for 16 car/trailers and is designated as a roadside safety rest area. There is a single vault restroom, picnic areas with grills, play 4 1 6 16 2 1 26 $135 $135 $145 $3,520 $3,520 area with swings, and a basketball court. The major feature of this park is access to the McKenzie River by the mixed use boat ramp. A 0.2 mile trail runs along Deerhorn Landing 6.5 the perimeter of the park

his park offers parking for 56 cars, and 11 car/trailers and is a designated roadside safety rest area. The park has flushing restrooms that a compliant with current ADA guidelines and offers picnic areas with 4 1 6 16 2 1 26 $135 $135 $145 $3,520 $1,465 $4,985 grills. In addition the park features interpretive signage, a volleyball court, a 0.2 mile of trail, and an area for unsupervised swimming in the McKenzie River. The main feature of this park is the boat ramp Hendricks Bridge 17.8 which provides access to the McKenzie River. Unity 11.3 5 1 8 16 2 1 28 $135 $135 $145 $3,790 $3,790 Natural Area - This park is undeveloped parkland offering highly valued natural landscapes including old growth 6 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Big River 156 forests and wildflower prairies.

No existing development. This park features large lake front and sand dunes and is zoned within the 1 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Clear Lake Watershed Protection District. Due to the restrictive nature of the current zoning little to no Clear Lake Dunes 156.3 development is permitted.

This park is undeveloped. The Park boast excellent oak savanna habitat and includes many rare plants 3 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 within its boundaries. There is 0.2 miles of hiking Kinney 18.5 trails that weave through the park. This park offers gravel parking for 4 cars, picnic areas, 0.2 mile trail. The park’s main feature is access to the 6 1 2 16 2 1 22 $135 $135 $145 $2,980 $2,980 Siuslaw River and views of Siuslaw Falls and a fish Siuslaw Falls 78.9 ladder. Features: This park is currently undeveloped, but exhibits highly valued natural resources of coastal 1 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 South Beach 299.8 dune areas, wetlands, and marshes.

This park is currently undeveloped, but exhibits highly 1 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 valued natural resources of timber, dunes, wetlands, Three Mile Prarie 160.8 marshes, and sensitive habitat. Lane County Assessments

This park has undeveloped parking for 4 cars and features a 0.8 mile hiking trail that goes from the parking area to the top of the butte. The parks main 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 feature is the unique oak and douglas fir forests that flank the butte. The park features a high diversity of Vickery 91.3 native plant species. Undeveloped/Closed Park - Oakhurst Comm. Recreation Area0.5 This park is undeveloped. 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 This park offers a gravel parking area, forested areas, and open space. This park is identified to 3 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 Peaceful Valley 9.8 accommodate large events. Land Bank - Blue Mountain Park is the largest Lane County Park in the Coast Fork of the Willamette watershed. It includes picnic tables, 0.8 miles of hiking trails and 6 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 access to Mosby Creek. The park is otherwise Blue Mountain Property 266 undeveloped. Myers Tract 3.3 This park has no development or public access. 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 `` - Maintained Parks (Contractual) -

This park includes several picnic areas, a asphalt boat 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,834 $3,734 ramp, an asphalt path, and flushing restrooms. The Ben and Kay Dorris 86 majority of the park is undeveloped.

This park offers parking for 8 car/trailers, a portable restroom, and a boat ramp for access to the 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 McKenzie River. This park is under Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) ownership. Public access and Hayden Bridge 3 operations are managed through agreement. This park offers parking for 10 cars and a portable restroom and is a designated roadside safety rest area. The park’s primary feature includes many 4 1 2 8 2 1 14 $135 $135 $145 $1,900 $1,900 picnic areas with grills and pedestrian access to the Jennie B. Harris 4.2 McKenzie River. Portfolio Acres 4454 227 67 256 712 134 67 1236 $167,530 $151,962 $319,492

FCA $167,530 Below Grade $151,962 Expenses $5,000 Total NTE Fee $324,492

Dean Leonard, MRICS, MCIOB Faithful+Gould, Inc. 12725 SW Millikan Way Suite 230 Beaverton, OR 97005

Mobile: +1 480.286.5705

Faithful+Gould | RFP – Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Page 11 of 11

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROPOSAL

LANE COUNTY PARKS DIVISION LANE COUNTY PARKS FACILITIES CONDITION ASSESSMENT PROPOSAL LCPFCA001

March 2, 2020

Submitted by:

Hue Architecture

Hue Architecture 20 NW Third Street  Gresham, Oregon 97030  503.343.4242 Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Proposal March 2, 2020

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

Mr. Brett Henry Parks Division Manager Lane County Parks Division 3050 N Delta Highway Eugene, Oregon 97408

Dear Selection Committee:

Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal for professional Architectural and Engineering services for the Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Project. We have thoroughly reviewed the scope and requirements identified in RFP #LCPFCA001. I feel we have an in-depth understanding of the requirements for this project and are uniquely qualified to assist the Lane County Parks Division with your facilities condition assessment.

Hue Architecture is an assumed business name (dba) of Hue Design, Inc which is an Oregon Corporation. Not only are we an Equal Opportunity Employer, but Hue Design, Inc. is an Oregon COBID certified Woman Owned, and Emerging Small Business (Certificate #11785). Our consultant partners proposed for this project are also local Oregon businesses, and our Civil Engineering team is located in Eugene.

Our proposed process includes bringing together a multi-disciplinary team of Architects and Engineers that are experienced not only in facility assessments, but in designing solutions for facility deferred maintenance projects. Our team has worked together to develop a combined schedule and work plan to maximize our efficiency and minimize our impact on Lane County Parks personnel.

This project’s scope will include Architectural, Landscape, Structural, Civil, Mechanical, and Electrical engineering services as appropriate for each of the 69 sites per Lane County Parks Facilities Spreadsheet. Included within our evaluation, based upon facilities and locations provided, will be the evaluation of above-ground infrastructure including buildings, pavilions, kiosks, cabins and other structures for architectural, civil, structural, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems. We will also evaluate play equipment, parking lots, roads, hard and soft trails, camping spaces, picnic areas, docks and marinas as well as other given assets.

Our approach to reviewing sub-surface infrastructure is included on the following pages and includes reviewing and evaluating the conditions and providing recommendations for targeted (invasive) investigation. Our design team has the capability to provide or coordinate additional survey, locate, and invasive access (demolition/excavation) as needed.

We commit to providing the services requested in the RFP and outlined in our proposal. Our team is highly qualified, motivated, and immediately available. We are capable of meeting the requested 24-month schedule. We have the staffing capacity to propose a shorter 13-month schedule that minimizes our impact on LCP staff, if that is acceptable to LCP.

I (Brad Dehle) am the authorized representative of Hue Architecture. I will be the contract/document signing authority for this project. Please feel free to contact me for any questions or comments regarding this proposal.

Sincerely,

Brad Dehle, AIA Hue Architecture 20 NW Third Street Gresham, Oregon 97030 503-490-8933 [email protected]

Hue Architecture 20 NW Third Street  Gresham, Oregon 97030  503.343.4242 Page 1 Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Proposal March 2, 2020

A.3 (a) SUBSURFACE INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT

We understand the Facilities Condition Assessment will be based on general guidelines outlined in ASTM E2018-08 for the existing buildings and improvements located on the property.

Subsurface Utilities expected to be present at most parks include the following: 1. Water 2. Electricity 3. Natural Gas 4. Sanitary Sewer 5. Storm Drainage 6. Underground Tanks 7. Special Utility Systems (wells, water or wastewater treatment, or power generation)

Our specific approach to subsurface utility inventory and assessment will be a collaborative effort between the team of professional designers who have a long track record of designing site facilities, both on new and rehabilitative projects and the Lane County Parks staff who have the “boots on the ground” experience and familiarity with the systems in question.

Local Presence and Access Several team members (Peter Miller, Anna Backus, Taylor Hood, Stephanie Bell) working on the project live in Eugene, OR and we use these parks for our own recreation. Most of these parks are within 1 hour of our office so we have great flexibility to access the sites. We have also worked extensively with most of the local franchise utility providers and we can leverage those relationships to potentially get further information about specific sites as needed.

Document Reviews and Interviews We will request and review records or documents provided by Lane County Parks to identify existing systems known at the sites. This information may include record drawings, as-builts, historical photos, inspection records, sketches, known repair projects, or permits issued. In addition, we may ask Lane County to complete a Pre-Walk-Through Survey Questionnaire to ascertain the extent of available information and to “zero in” on potential problem areas during the coordination phase of each zone.

Perhaps the most important step in determining what facilities exist at a particular site is the face to face interaction with maintenance staff. Finding “the person” that has the historical knowledge of the site, has maintained the system, knows where all the valves and manholes are, and knows what works and what doesn’t work is paramount to the success of the investigation.

Walk Through Survey Once the Document Review/Interview process is completed, the next step is the Walk-through-survey. Team members will visually observe all of the sites to document as much information as possible. It is extremely helpful to walk the site with Parks Maintenance staff to review in real time the information discovered leading up to this point. Parks staff can also highlight areas of concern that will be key components of the Facilities Condition Assessment. During the site visits, team members will take photographs, record notes and observations, and create sketches to document to the best of our abilities the existing conditions. Specific to each utility, will expect to document: 1. Water – fire hydrant, fire protection standpipes, tanks, valves, backflow devices. 2. Electricity – Overhead poles, transformers, guy wires, meters. 3. Natural Gas – gas meters, valves, tanks. 4. Sanitary Sewer – manholes, cleanouts, building connections, drain field locations, septic tanks. 5. Storm Drainage – inlets, manholes, tanks, culverts, discharge points, headwalls, erosion areas, general topography as it affects stormwater conveyance and discharge. 6. Underground Tanks – water, sewer, stormwater 7. Special Utility Systems (wells, water or wastewater treatment, or power generation)

Hue Architecture 20 NW Third Street  Gresham, Oregon 97030  503.343.4242 Page 2 Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Proposal March 2, 2020

We will document and assess the above items based upon visual observations at the site, interviews from parks staff, and existing document review. The above items will be georeferenced by a hand-held GPS unit for entry into the County’s GIS system. It is not anticipated this information needs to be documented at a licensed surveyor level.

It is our experience that performing intensive subsurface investigation and analysis over a significantly large area is cost prohibitive and the results are often less than desired given the gross uncertainty of certain methods including: Infrared Thermography (IR), Impact-eco (IE), Ground Microwave Penetrating Radar (GPR), Flow Monitoring, Water Sampling, & Closed-Circuit Television to assess structural defects.

Given the broad range of facilities to be reviewed, we propose to target problem areas for further analyses as an additional service to the base contract. By narrowing the scope to the areas that are truly in need of deeper investigation is a better use of public funds. At the specific sites with utilities of concern we could potentially utilize an underground utility locate service or use a camera to scope a specific sewer or storm drain line. We will work closely with Parks staff to identify areas that need intensive review and then move forward with an understanding of the cost and the expected deliverable. This way, everyone’s expectations are met, and the County will achieve maximum value.

Hue Architecture 20 NW Third Street  Gresham, Oregon 97030  503.343.4242 Page 3 Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Proposal March 2, 2020

A.3 (b) PROJECT SCHEDULE

The project schedule on the following page coordinates with the level of effort chart in the fee proposal section. We have divided the schedule into four primary sections:

Preparation (May-September): Project initiation kick off meetings, contracts, full wall scheduling, database set-up, establish/approve survey template, conduct initial site assessment (test). The test site will be reviewed with the LCP steering committee and if approved, we will then continue the cycle with the remaining parks within our outlined zones.

Assessment (October-February): We have identified 6 separate zones to sub-divide and organize the project to maximize our on-site efficiency. Each zone is approximately 4 weeks with a one-week overlap. The first and last week of each zone will be in-office prep and data input time.

Data Input (November-March): We will be overlapping tasks from the field to our offices to better utilize our time. Data input will happen in the field, but also continue in-office once the site assessments are complete. Technical staff will assist with final data entry in our asset database spreadsheet, survey templates, and LCP’s VUEWorks asset management software. We will also produce a preliminary draft of all deliverables.

Analysis (April-May): The analysis phase will include reviewing all information, quantifying each assets FCI, reviewing life cycle costs, energy efficiency, utilization, evaluating sites for code and accessibility compliance, finalizing drafts of all deliverables, and reviewing the assessments with LCP staff.

One final County Parks Executive Report will then be prepared and issued. It will contain structured spreadsheets with all capital asset inventory data, cross-referenced digital photos in support of the deficiencies noted during the assessment, assessment methodologies, life cycle budgets, scope and definitions requested and used.

Hue Architecture 20 NW Third Street  Gresham, Oregon 97030  503.343.4242 Page 4 Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Proposal March 2, 2020

Hue Architecture 20 NW Third Street  Gresham, Oregon 97030  503.343.4242 Page 5 Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Proposal March 2, 2020

A.3 (c) FEE PROPOSAL

Project: Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment

Scope of Work: The scope of work includes Architectural and Engineering services to evaluate, assess, and report the current conditions of structures, infrastructure, utilities, trails, and outdoor furnishings/signage of approximately 69 sites as described in the Request for Proposals for Contract LCPFCA001.

In general, the grounds and facilities identified in the RFP will be reviewed based on ANSI standard E2018-15 and any additional specific requirements described in this proposal. Investigation will include observation and assessment of visual elements accessible to view and sub-surface utility evaluation as described in the attached narrative.

Proposed Values: Part of our Philosophy at Hue Design is to work with our clients and team members to develop a fee value that represents the effort associated with a project scope that meets the needs of the client. We work with the whole project team to define roles, responsibilities, scope, and required effort, with the ultimate goal to bring the best value to our clients.

The following chart reflects our teams requested compensation for the proposed services. Services will be billed monthly, based on our percentage of project completion related to the agreed project schedule. We have divided the project sites into 6 proposed “zones” to consolidate travel and maximize our on-site time. The following fee schedule is listed by discipline broken down by the general project phases:

Prep/Meeting (office) : preparing survey documents, coordinating team, scheduling access, meetings, research. Assessment (field): Travel to locations, in-field condition assessment. Data Input (office): Compiling field data, input to collaboration site, and input to LCP VUEWorks database. Analysis (office): Evaluation of the conditions encountered, recommendations (FCI), estimates, and final reports.

Proposed Fee by Discipline Reimb. Prep/Meeting Assessment Data Input Analysis Total Architectural $6,000 $32,800 $47,040 $23,920 $46,480 $150,240 Structural $3,600 $25,895 $28,000 $11,160 $21,825 $86,880 Civil $2,600 $6,680 $56,860 $27,335 $48,030 $138,905 Landscape $14,400 $12,340 $43,810 $18,000 $41,270 $115,420 Mechanical/Plumbing $3,600 $8,955 $33,280 $13,850 $73,570 $129,655 Electrical $3,600 $8,955 $33,280 $13,850 $73,570 $129,655 Total $750,755 Reimbursables: The “Reimb.” column shown above is an estimate for reimbursable expenses anticipated for the project. Reimbursables will be billed at our cost plus 10%. These costs may include travel (mileage to project sites), food, and lodging if an overnight stay is required. Expenses are included to accommodate the printing and distribution of review documents for each review meeting (10 total), and 2 hard copies of both draft and final reports if required.

Total Fee: Our total proposed fee, including the reimbursable budget of $750,755 . However, we are willing to work with LCP to fine tune the scope of work and fee to meet the project requirements.

Hue Architecture 20 NW Third Street  Gresham, Oregon 97030  503.343.4242 Page 6 Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Proposal March 2, 2020

Hours/Level of Effort: For the sake of brevity, we have consolidated our project effort plan into the following chart. We evaluated each site for level of effort, location, and required disciplines needed for assessment. The chart identifies our proposed staff, role/title, hourly rate, and hours by task/phase for the project.

Hours by Task Discipline/Staff Role Rate Prep/Meeting Assessment Data Entry Analysis Total Hours Architecture - Hue Architecture Total 1508 Brad Dehle PIC/PA 120 80 312 16 204 612 Tracey Joslin PM 100 160 40 160 360 Jonathan Jonas TD 80 48 120 120 40 328 Kelsey Plucar PC 70 48 120 40 208 Structural - KPFF Engineers Total 542 Craig Totten PIC 235 10 8 18 Stuart Finney PM 185 51 17 17 85 Matt Hoffman PE 160 68 175 40 105 388 Gina Kim PC 95 34 17 51 Civil - KPFF Engineers Total 921 Pete Miller PE/PM 195 2 63 65 Anna Backus PE 180 27 183 137 347 Taylor Hood TD 130 11 184 85 149 429 Steph Bell PC 100 40 40 80 Landscape Total 1064 Gill Williams PIC 170 2 12 14 Jason King LA 160 16 69 85 Andrew Holder PM 110 44 141 109 294 Nadja Quiroz TD 100 46 283 180 162 671 Mechanical/Plumbing - R&W Engineering Total 940 Edward Carlisle PE 160 32 104 206 342 Mark Jones PE/PM 160 16 104 206 326 Greg Kienle TD 100 95 95 Tamara Philips PC 75 17 58 102 177 Electrical - R&W Engineering Total 940 Sam Russum PE 160 32 104 206 342 Jonathan Lilly PE/PM 160 16 104 206 326 Michael Foster TD 100 95 95 Samantha Kurilo PC 75 17 58 102 177

PIC= Principal-in-Charge PA= Project Architect LA= Landscape Architect PE= Project Engineer PM= Project Manager TD= Technical engineering/architectural staff PC = Project Coordinator

Hue Architecture 20 NW Third Street  Gresham, Oregon 97030  503.343.4242 Page 7 Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Proposal March 2, 2020

A.3 (d) LANE COUNTY STAFF INVOLVEMENT

Hue Architecture’s approach to minimizing staff disruption is a multi-prong approach to maximize effect while minimizing impact. This is accomplished utilizing the following steps. 1) Create a clear schedule with all stakeholders input, in advance. 2) Consolidate timelines, conduct assessments at off-peak times. 3) Multi-discipline Approach 4) Be Prepared 5) Plan the work and work the Plan

Schedule in advance: If we are chosen to assist you with the condition assessment, we will work with all project stake holders to refine our proposed schedule and detail out the timelines for visiting each asset in each zone. Our plan sub-divides all the sites into 6 zones. By planning all the visits in advance, LCP will be able to decide the sequence and availability that works best.

Consolidate field work to off-peak times: We propose to conduct most of the field work for the site assessments between October of 2020 and February of 2021 . Our project team is scalable with many experienced staff available to handle a shorter assessment timetable.

Multi-disciplinary: Our multi-disciplinary team allows us to provide the range of expertise required, along with the staffing capacity to scale our work plan to the desired schedule. Both on-site and in-office work will be a coordinated effort between various disciplines including architecture, structural engineering, civil engineering, mechanical/electrical engineering, and landscape. By incorporating all team members, we can coordinate all disciplines to be on site together, minimize time on site at each facility, reduce effort, streamline meetings and pull together conclusions in a more effective and efficient manner thereby curtailing staff disruption.

Be Prepared: We schedule meetings and field assessment times at the beginning of the project so all effected parties can be present. Ahead of these meetings Lane County Parks staff will receive an overview of the meeting agenda fully detailing what will be discussed. Imbedded within the agenda will be any questions, concerns, issues and ideas that need to be addressed. Lane County Park staff are then able to come to the meetings or site evaluations prepared - having had an opportunity to have discussions before stepping into meetings to give direction or make decisions. This allows our meeting time to be focused on verification, outcome, and answers, rather than questions and indecisions. This will shorten meetings into more manageable and productive use of time for LCP staff.

Plan the work and work the Plan. Our plan is to put together the back-end database/spreadsheets, on-site inspection templates, and schedules ahead of time during the busy summer months. This means little to no impact on Lane County Park staff during the 2020 summer season. Once into October 2020 we will start the on-site field work. The field work will be completed in a timely fashion and give us 4 months to do site visitations to park facilities requiring interaction with staff members. Starting February 2021, we will have completed our inspections requiring LCP staff and will move onto sites where staff participation is not required, and re- visit and sites that require additional review. By establishing a clear plan and schedule ahead of time, and actively managing the project through effective communications, we will increase our efficiency in engaging LCP staff.

Hue Architecture 20 NW Third Street  Gresham, Oregon 97030  503.343.4242 Page 8 EXHIBIT B - PROPOSER'S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS Hue Design, Inc (dba Hue Architecture) Proposer's Name:

RFP Title: Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment

ADDENDA Proposer has received and considered, in the accompanying proposal, the terms of the following addenda, if any: Addenda 1,2,3

CERTIFICATIONS By signing this Proposer's Certification form, Proposer certifies that:

1. Certification of Resident Bidder Status. Proposer is _____isx not _____ (check one) a resident bidder, as defined in ORS 279A.120. 2. Certification of Non-Discrimination. Proposer has not discriminated and will not discriminate against a subcontractor in awarding a subcontract because the subcontractor is a disadvantaged business enterprise, minority-owned business, woman-owned business, a business that a service-disabled veteran owns, or an emerging small business that is certified under ORS 200.055. 3. Certification of Non-Collusion. This proposal is made without connection or agreement with any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity making a proposal for the same services, and is in all respects fair and free from collusion or collaboration with any other proposer.

RFP template – electronic proposals, rev. 07/01/2019 8 Page 9 4. Certification of Compliance with Tax Laws. Proposer has, to the best of Proposer's knowledge, complied with Oregon tax laws in the period prior to the submission of this proposal, including: a. All tax laws of the State of Oregon, including but not limited to ORS 305.620 and ORS chapters 316, 317, and 318, b. Any tax provisions imposed by a political subdivision of this state that applied to Proposer or its property, goods, services, operations, receipts, income, performance of or compensation for any work performed, and c. Any rules, regulations, charter provisions, or ordinances that implemented or enforced any of the foregoing tax laws or provisions.

The undersigned, by signature here, acknowledges, accepts, and certifies to the Proposer's Statements and Certifications as stated above.

PROPOSER

Hue Design, Inc.

Authorized signature Proposer’s legal name

Brad Dehle 20 NW Third Street Name of authorized signer Address

Director of Architecture Gresham, Oregon 97030 Title

March 02, 2020 47- 4150548 Date Federal Tax ID number

OPTIONAL CONTACT INFORMATION REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL

Tracey Joslin

Contact name

503-343-4242 Telephone number

[email protected] Email address

RFP template – electronic proposals, rev. 07/01/2019 9 Page 10 DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 6/18/2019 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: Renee Cleveland LaPorte & Associates, Inc. PHONE FAX (A/C, No, Ext): 503-239-4116 (A/C, No): 503-231-9021 5515 SE MILWAUKIE AVENUE E-MAIL Portland OR 97202 ADDRESS: [email protected] INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #

INSURER A : Hanover American Insurance Company HUEDESI-01 INSURED INSURER B : Allmerica Financial Benefit Hue Design, Inc 20 NW 3rd Street INSURER C : Axis Insurance Co 37273 Gresham OR 97030 INSURER D : National Fire Ins Co of Hartford 20478 INSURER E :

INSURER F : COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 610490904 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS A COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY OZ2D62825700 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2,000,000 DAMAGE TO RENTED CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ 300,000 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 10,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 4,000,000 PRO- POLICY JECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 4,000,000 OTHER: $ B AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT AW2D62825300 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 (Ea accident) $ 1,000,000 X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $

A X UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR OZ2D62825700 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ 1,000,000

DED RETENTION $ $ D WORKERS COMPENSATION PER OTH- WC621344402 12/5/2018 12/5/2019 X STATUTE ER AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 500,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N / A (Mandatory in NH) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 500,000 If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000 C Errors & Omissions AEA002633022018 7/3/2018 7/3/2019 Per Claim 2,000,000

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) Certificate Holder and all required entities are additional insured when required by written contract. Endorsements attached.

CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE EXAMPLE CERTIFICATE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. ORIGINALSouth Peninsula TO BEHospital MAILED 4300 Bartlett St DIRECTLYHomer AK FROM99603 CARRIER AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

Proposal to Conduct Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment Contract LCPFCA001 02 March 2020

Prepared by: Submitted to: Cardno GS, Inc. Mr. Brett Henry 801 Second Ave Parks Division Manager Suite 700 Lane County Public Works Seattle, WA 98104 3050 N. Delta Highway Rick Unruh, PE Eugene, Oregon 97408 [email protected] [email protected] 206.999.9579 541.682.2001

Proposal to Conduct Facility Condition Assessment for Lane County Parks

1. Process for Creating an Inventory and Assessment of Subsurface Infrastructure The project team is experienced with inventorying and assessing sub-surface infrastructure including water lines, sewer lines, septic systems, underground storage tanks, irrigation systems, pumping systems, and other utilities. . The approach that Cardno uses to gather and quantify existing subsurface utility information within the project limits relies on the risk-based standard published by the American Society of Civil Engineers as guideline ASCE 38-02. ASCE 38 sets forth an investigative procedure which delivers data that clearly indicates the source and the reliability of the information. Additionally all data will be reviewed by a Registered Professional Engineer to assure the client that the standard of care for utility investigations was met.

Based on Cardno’s understanding of the needs of the client, we propose providing Quality Level C data on subsurface utilities per ASCE 38-02. This approach utilizes client provided as built and record drawings, staff interviews, GIS data, publicly available information, and surface investigation to best inventory and assess these systems. The systems will be assessed by civil, electrical and landscape assessors, as appropriate. We will perform a visual assessment of all systems, as accessible from the surface. If County staff are available to open catch basins, vaults and other access points, the assessors will use flashlights and cameras to make observations from those vantage points, as well. We are confident this methodology will provide the County with the desired information regarding location, quantity and condition of subsurface utilities.

Should the surface investigations find evidence of potential problems needing further investigation (such as GPR, water sampling, flow monitoring, etc.), a rough order-of-magnitude cost estimate with scope will be developed and submitted for consideration by the County. If desired, the consultant team will prepare and submit a proposal for a contract modification to perform the additional scope.

In general, all assessments will follow a similar approach. ADA and life safety assessments, will be performed using standardized checklists with assessor noting readily visible concerns or items that may require additional investigation. Code compliance is a highly complex issue, which at a minimum involves identifying the code in effect at the time of original construction or latest renovation. Because of this, and to maximize cost and time-efficiency, the Cardno review for code compliance also will be based on only readily visible issues and conditions, as opposed to an in-depth assessment. Areas of potential concern will be noted for repair or further investigation, as appropriate. This includes playground equipment, buildings and all other systems.

2. Project Schedule with Key Milestones and Deliverables The schedule, attached at the end of this proposal, begins with a notice to proceed, followed by a kick-off meeting and team mobilization shortly thereafter. During the planning and preparation phase, the team will collect and review available field data, conduct interviews with County staff and configure Paragon to the County’s assets. Additionally, this time will be used to develop a project-specific health and safety plan, confirm communication and site-access protocols, and finalize the list of assets to be assessed. The schedule will be reviewed during the planning phase and adjusted, to accommodate County constraints on access and staff availability and to execute the work in an efficient manner. The anticipated duration of the project is approximately 32 weeks. This can be accelerated or extended, if desired by adding additional staff or adjusting the time between field assessment cycles. The schedule generally involves cycles of approximately two weeks of fieldwork, followed by two weeks of office time to finalize data and prepare reports. Once the report format and content are approved following the calibration site, draft reports will be submitted as completed after each phase of work. Each report will be finalized following receipt of comments from the County. The final, County-Wide Parks Executive Report,

Proposal to Conduct Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment

along with the presentation to be made to the County Parks stakeholders group, will be developed following submission of the last draft park report and submitted for review and comment. The presentation will be scheduled with the County as the field work nears completion to ensure adequate preparation and coordination time.

3. Fee-based Proposal The Number of Staff Assigned to the Project along with their Job Titles The proposed team consists of 17 staff members, as well as three (3) supporting and backup staff. Names, titles, general responsibilities and billing rates are below.

Project Team Staff Member Job Title Responsibilities Rate/hr Robin St. Charles, PMP, LEED QC Director Authority and overall responsibility for client satisfaction $220.00 AP Rick Unruh, PE Overall project management, scheduling, client OR 95093PE, WA 46435, Project Manager coordination, progress reporting, resource management, $210.00 AACE Certifed Cost presentations, deliverables, non-fleet owned equipment Technician Brian Rich, AIA, LEED BD&C, Interior finishes; walls, doors, flooring, ceilings, windows, PMP permanently installed fixtures, building envelope, Lead Architect $160.00 RA: IL 001016681; WA building accessibility, ADA requirements, historic 9108 elements Roadways, parking lots, pavements, sidewalks, site Matt Lewis, PE drainage, sewer lines and systems, water lines and Lead Civil $219.00 OR 78628PE; WA 44063 systems, revetments, underground tanks, pumping systems Paul Kluvers, PE, SE Substructure, framing, floor slabs, structural exterior wall OR 11722PE; WA 21628 Lead Structural systems, seismic assessment, seismic risk, foundation $217.50 AK AELC6579; HI PE12492 integrity, revetments, life safety Trent Grantham, PLA, ASLA Lead Landscape Trails, sports fields, play equipment, irrigation, fencing $135.00 OR LA634; WA 943; NV 838 HVAC, major mechanical systems, equipment William Luthie, PE, CEM, identification and classification, plumbing systems, LEED AP Lead Mechanical backflow prevention, fire protection systems, exhaust $185.00 VA: 0402012212; TX 135126 and ventilation, control systems, conveyance systems, underground storage tanks Andrew Fulton, PE Marinas, floating docks, transient docks, boat slides, Lead Waterfront $175.00 DE 21283; MD 55018 piers, boat ramps Electrical infrastructure including electrical distribution, Lead Electrical/Site lighting, automation, specialized electrical and power Eric Hartwig, Master Electrical & Mechanical systems, emergency power, security systems, equipment $160.00 Electrician Assessor identification/classification, site electrical systems and lighting, fire/life safety, campsite RV hookups Reporting and Data Data quality, data analysis and management, report Kelly Gunn $165.00 Analysis production

Proposal to Conduct Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment

Staff Member Job Title Responsibilities Rate/hr Field Team Coordinates field assessment teams, primary field client Jan Shawyer Lead/Electrical & contact, electrical and mechanical/plumbing assessments $165.00 Mechanical Assessor for buildings Architectural/ADA Alejandra Monterrosa Architectural and ADA assessments for buildings $120.00 Asssessor Principal Landscape Chris Overdorf, PLA Trails, sports fields, play equipment, irrigation, fencing $165.00 Architect Joyelaine Sherman-Lewis Structural Assessor Structural assessments for all buildings and structures $88.00 Marinas, floating docks, transient docks, boat slides, Kevin Wilson, EIT Waterfront assessor $125.00 piers, boat ramps Roadways, parking lots, pavements, sidewalks, site Becky Strickler, PLA Site Civil Assessor drainage, sewer lines and systems, water lines and $129.00 systems, revetments, underground tanks Administrative Kim St. Charles Coordinator/Technical Coordinate travel arrangements, edit reports $95.00 Editor Roadways, parking lots, pavements, sidewalks, site Jeff Vanderdasson Civil Engineer drainage, sewer lines and systems, water lines and $135.00 systems, revetments, underground tanks Backup Structural Jade McDaniel $101.00 Assessor Backup Site Civil Mary Wiser $107.00 Assessor Backup Landscape Colin Owen $115.00 Assessor

The work will be conducted as multiple tasks, including field work and office work. The tasks include: • Project Start-up and Calibration (office and field work, including developing protocols, finalizing asset list, completing pilot assessment and developing report template). • Field Work (completing all remaining assessments) • Project Management/Quality Control (office work, including over-all management of the project, data and report quality control and assurance, client communication and team resource management). • Data management and Reporting (office work including paragon set-up and management, data checks, data analysis, cost estimating and report development). Estimated hours for each role in each task are shown in the tables on the following pages.

Proposal to Conduct Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment

Field Tasks

Field Task Hours to Complete Job Title Task 1: Project Start-Up/Calibration 80 Project Manager 80 Lead Architect 80 Lead Civil 80 Lead Structural 64 Lead Landscape 80 Lead Mechanical 64 Lead Waterfront 64 Lead Electrical 50 Field Team Lead 24 Arch/ADA Assessor 24 Structural Assessor 24 Waterfront Assessor 24 Site Civil Assessor 40 Backup Structural Assessor 40 Backup Civil Assessor 40 Backup Landscape Assessor 40 Principal Landscape Architect 40 Civil Engineer 60 Data/Reporting Manager 30 Admin. Coord. TASK 2: Field Work 160 Field Team Lead 160 Arch/ADA Assessor 160 Structural Assessor 280 Lead Landscape 280 Site Civil Assessor 280 Lead Electrical 160 Lead Waterfront 160 Waterfront Assessor

Proposal to Conduct Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment

Office Tasks

Office Task Hours to Complete Job Title Task 1: Project Management/Quality Control 20 QC Director 80 Project Manager 40 Lead Architect 40 Lead Civil 50 Lead Structural 40 Lead Landscape 40 Lead Mechanical 40 Lead Waterfront 40 Lead Electrical 30 Field Team Lead 40 Admin Coord.

Task 2: Data Management & Reporting 160 Field Team Lead 280 Lead Landscape 280 Lead Electrical 280 Site Civil Assessor 160 Arch/ADA Assessor 160 Structural Assessor 160 Lead Waterfront 160 Waterfront Assessor 660 Data/Reporting Manager 80 Admin. Coord.

Total Price – Not-to-Exceed – Including all Expenses

Out-of-Pocket Expenses $ 115,800.00 Administrative Overhead $ 60,120.00 Field Tasks Total Price $ 395,010.00 Office Tasks Total Price $ 428,755.00 Contract Amount (all-inclusive – Not-to-Exceed) $ 999,685.00

4. Minimizing Disruption of County Staff while Obtaining Data for the Assessment Our team of experienced assessors is adept at minimizing disruptions to normal operations. Our typical practice is to consult with a building point of contact in advance to review the scope of the assessment and our proposed plan and timing for completing it. We will discuss potential sensitive areas and access/security issues to ensure our team is aware of these concerns. Our standard procedures include avoiding conversation in occupied spaces, avoiding capturing people in photos, posting someone at the door for bathrooms and other sensitive areas, and not entering living spaces without an escort. Most of the assets to be visited can be assessed with minimal disruption, particularly trails, fields, marinas and other open areas. Occupied buildings, including living quarters,

Proposal to Conduct Lane County Parks Facilities Condition Assessment restrooms, and meeting spaces will be carefully reviewed during project start-up to determine the least disruptive times of day to visit and to coordinate access requirements, such as keys or escorts in advance. With 61 Parks and open areas to assess (parks with no improvements will not be assessed), we will remain flexible to accommodate the County’s staff and operations. We will coordinate assessment schedules around operating hours and schedule work during late afternoons, nights, and/or weekends as needed. Cardno has additional professional engineers and architects proficient in FCAs to accelerate scheduling needs if requested by the County. Our facility and asset management expertise stretches worldwide and provides exceptional depth to meet County requirements.

5. Exceptions to the Lane County Services Contract Template If awarded this contract Cardno would like to request the following alterations to the standard contract language. Requested deletions are indicated with strikeS -through,S and requested additions are underlinedU .U Comments are in Bold Italics.

2.5 Indemnification. To the extent permitted by the Oregon Constitution and by the Oregon Tort Claims Act, and to the extent otherwise provided for in private contracts of insurance, Contractor agrees to

indemnify, defend,S S and hold County, officers, agents, and employees, harmless from all damages, losses

and expenses, including but not limited to attorney fees, andS to defend all claims, proceedings, lawsuits,

and judgments S arising out of or resulting from,U and to the extent caused by U Contractor's neU gligent

performanceU of or failure to perform under this Contract. However,S ContractorS will not be required to indemnify or defend County for any liability arising solely out of wrongful acts of County's own officers,

agents, or employees. NotwithstandiU ng any other provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to limit the liability of the other related to this agreement under any theory of law to the maximum of their respective insurance coverage. Neither party shall be liable for the actions nor inactions of the other party. Neither party shall be liable for consequential damages, and no claim related to this agreement may be brought in contract or tort more than two (2) years after the cause of action arose. Cardno is insured to provide the above indemnification in case of a claim. We cannot provide up front defense, but can reimburse defense costs related to our proportionate share of the fault. We request a limitation of liability. Cardno carries $7.5M in professional liability coverage.

3. CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATIONS

3.1 Contractor must meet the highestS S standards prevalent in the industry or business most closely involved in providing the goods or services or personal services covered by this Contract, unless County has good cause and the Contract provides otherwise. Cardno will exercise the same degree of care and skill customarily exercised in our profession.

ID Task Task Name M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 Mode W-1 W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W11 W12 W13 W14 W15 W16 W17 W18 W19 W20 W21 W22 W23 W24 W25 W26 W27 W28 W29 W30 W31 W32 W 1 Contract Award 2 Contract Execution, Subcontract execution & Project Set up 3 Kickoff call 4 Project Startup 5 Document Review 6 Maintenance Staff interviews 7 Develop Safety Plan, finalize asset list, Paragon set up, etc. 8 Calibration 9 Pilot Site (Richardson) 10 Data/Office work 11 Pilot Report Draft 12 Review/Comments 13 Final Pilot Report 14 Field Work Round 1 15 Building Team 16 Site Team 17 Waterfront Team 18 Data/Office work 19 Reporting 20 Field Work Round 2 21 Building Team 22 Site Team 23 Waterfront Team 24 Data/Office work 25 Reporting 26 Field Work Round 3 27 Site Team 28 Data/Office work 29 Reporting 30 Field Work Round 4 31 Site Team 32 Data/Office work 33 Reporting 34 Review/Comments 35 Final Reports Submitted

36 Presentation to Lane County Parks stakeholders

Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Project: Lane County parks sche Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Date: Fri 2/28/20 Milestone Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress

Summary Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone

Page 1 EXHIBIT B - PROPOSER'S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS

Proposer's Name: Cardno GS, Inc.

RFP Title: Lane County Parks Facility Condition Assessment, Contract LCPFCA001

ADDENDA Proposer has received and considered, in the accompanying proposal, the terms of the following addenda, if any: Addenda 1, 2 and 3

CERTIFICATIONS By signing this Proposer's Certification form, Proposer certifies that:

1. Certification of Resident Bidder Status. Proposer is _____is not _____X (check one) a resident bidder, as defined in ORS 279A.120. 2. Certification of Non-Discrimination. Proposer has not discriminated and will not discriminate against a subcontractor in awarding a subcontract because the subcontractor is a disadvantaged business enterprise, minority-owned business, woman-owned business, a business that a service-disabled veteran owns, or an emerging small business that is certified under ORS 200.055. 3. Certification of Non-Collusion. This proposal is made without connection or agreement with any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity making a proposal for the same services, and is in all respects fair and free from collusion or collaboration with any other proposer.

RFP template – electronic proposals, rev. 07/01/2019 8

The undersigned, by signature here, acknowledges, accepts, and certifies to the Proposer's Statements and Certifications as stated above.

PROPOSER

Cardno GS, Inc. Authorized signature Proposer’s legal name

Steve Clonts 2496 Old Ivy Road, Suite 300 Name of authorized signer Address

Director of Contracts Charlottesville, VA 22903 Title

02/28/20 54-1524820 Date Federal Tax ID number

OPTIONAL CONTACT INFORMATION REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL

Rick Unruh Contact name

206-999-9579 Telephone number

[email protected] Email address

RFP template – electronic proposals, rev. 07/01/2019 9

Memorandum Date: February 11, 2020

Meeting Date: February 25, 2020

TO: Board of County Commissioners

DEPARTMENT: Public Works, Parks Division

PRESENTED BY: Brett Henry, Parks Division Manager

AGENDA ITEM TITLE: WORK SESSION/ Update on the Willamette Confluence Preserve Transfer Process

I. MOTION

None. Discussion only.

II. AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

III. The purpose of this work session is to update the Board on the ownership transfer process for The Nature Conservancy’s (“TNC”) 1,305 acre Willamette Confluence Preserve (“WCP”). Following a Work Session presentation to the Board on May 22, 2019, Lane County Parks’ (“Parks”) submitted a non-binding response to the questionnaire that TNC had released for prospective future owners. The response was submitted on June 14, 2019 with support from the Board of Commissioners.

IV. BACKGROUND/IMPLICATIONS OF ACTION

A. Board Action and Other History In the early 1970’s, the community’s vision for the park now known as Howard Buford Recreation Area (“HBRA”) was to encompass all of the land in the vicinity of Mount Pisgah located between the Coast Fork and Middle Fork of the Willamette. However, funding was only available at the time to purchase the 2,214 acres now known as HBRA. Additional land in the area remained in the ownership of the Wildish Land Company (“Wildish”). In November 2006, Wildish approached the Board of County Commissioners with an offer to sell their holdings located on the south side of the Middle Fork.

Page 1 of 6 This property possesses important open space and conservation values, including six miles of riverfront along the Middle Fork and Coast Fork of the Willamette. Subsequently, Lane County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with TNC, to negotiate with Wildish in cooperation and consultation with Lane County, as well as undertake the necessary steps in the acquisition process, including a real estate appraisal and identifying sources of funds for the acquisition. This process was described in the board packet and approved Board Order from the May 23, 2007, Board meeting. In 2010, TNC was successful in negotiating with Wildish for purchase of 1,207 acres of land and obtaining funding for the acquisition. This property has been named the “Willamette Confluence Preserve”. TNC’s intention was to own the property for the habitat restoration phase, which was anticipated to last for 10 to 15 years. The restoration of the property is now complete. On March 18, 2019, TNC released a non-binding questionnaire to solicit information from parties interested in owning and managing the Preserve and perpetuating its conservation values into the future. On June 11, 2019, the Board, through Board Order # 19-06-11-07, authorized Parks to submit a questionnaire response. The questionnaire response is included in this packet. No other responses were submitted by Parks or any other agency. B. Policy Issues As referenced in 2019, the May 23, 2007 Board Memo noted that acquisition of the Wildish property would be “consistent with a variety of parks and open space plans and policies for Lane County and for the State of Oregon.” Specifically, the Wildish property was identified as a “Potential Open Space Anchor” in the 2003 Rivers to Ridges Open Space Study, which was endorsed by the Lane County Board of Commissioners as well as Eugene, Springfield, and the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. More recently, the Lane County Parks Master Plan, adopted on December 18, 2018, contains the recommendation to “evaluate options to acquire the Willamette Confluence Preserve (Chapter 5, p. 55).”

The Parks Master Plan identifies six goals which support the long-term Vision and Mission of Lane County Parks. Acquisition of the Willamette Confluence Preserve comports with four of these goals.

Goals:

1. Collaborate – The acquisition and potential development process would engage residents and stakeholders in a coordinated effort to “…expand, enhance, interpret, provide and protect parks, natural areas, trails and recreation opportunities across Lane County.”

2. Connect – The Preserve is located in the center of and vitally important to the 4,700 acre area of conserved open space located on the edge of the Eugene- Springfield metro area in the vicinity of Mount Pisgah and the confluence of

Page 2 of 6 the Coast and Middle Forks of the Willamette River. The 4,700 acres are managed for conservation and recreation values by a set of stakeholders that includes, in addition to Lane County Parks and The Nature Conservancy: Friends of Buford Park and Mt. Pisgah, Mount Pisgah Arboretum, Willamalane Park and Recreation District, and the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department. Lane County owns the Howard Buford Recreation Area that contains 2,214 acres situated between the southern boundary of the Preserve and the Coast Fork of the Willamette River.

3. Protect resources – Keeping the Preserve in public ownership ensures that the natural areas would be sustained and managed so as to be protected for future generations.

4. Reflect our values – By focusing on the outdoor recreation character of Lane County Parks, opportunities exist to enhance our volunteer stewardship and partner with other agencies to share in the management of the property.

C. Board Goals

Acquiring the Willamette Confluence Preserve would support Lane County’s strategic priorities. Specifically, this project would address Initiative 2b, “Protect and enhance our natural and built environments” and Activity Area (3), “Develop action plans and funding to implement the Parks Master Plan”. This would be accomplished by completing the long-term vision for the Mount Pisgah area; an acquisition which also fulfills the Master Plan goals.

D. Financial and/or Resource Considerations The recipient of the property will need to have sufficient resources (funding, partnerships, and volunteers) to steward the restored habitats, potentially implement future habitat restoration work, and manage any public use of the property.

TNC estimates ongoing annual maintenance of $100,000 in contract costs and 0.5 FTE in personnel costs. Actual ownership costs for LCP would likely be higher, factoring in managing recreational access and the possibility of additional habitat management activities needed to achieve the desired future conditions.

TNC will transfer a $1 million endowment to the new owner of the property. This endowment may be sufficient to meet ongoing habitat maintenance costs but not the cost of additional park management costs. These costs may include: infrastructure improvements, ongoing management of visitor use, additional habitat restoration, and possible unknown costs such as possible future repairs to the constructed inlets to the restored ponds. Some of the future stewardship and maintenance work will be implemented through partnerships with stakeholders such as Friends of Buford Parks and Mt. Pisgah, the Mount Pisgah Arboretum, and the Oregon Parks & Recreation Department. If the WCP comes into County ownership , Lane County Parks would play a lead role in overseeing and funding the ongoing costs.

Page 3 of 6

E. Health Implications

1. Education – Acquisition of the Willamette Confluence Preserve would expand environmental educational opportunities beyond those currently available on existing park lands.

2. Employment & Livelihood – Adding a significant recreational area adjacent to the metropolitan area would support employment by increasing livability in Lane County and would support the health of Lane County residents by expanding opportunities for active recreation in the Mount Pisgah area.

3. Environmental Quality – The property would need to be managed in accordance with terms of the conservation easements. The habitat restoration was designed to support a natural floodplain and upland habitats that support ecosystem services, such as flood retention and improvement of air and water quality.

4. Parks & Natural Space – The acquisition would add 1,305 acres to parks, open spaces, and natural habitats.

5. Transportation – There is a potential transportation benefit if it becomes possible to construct an extension of the existing off-street bike path network from Springfield to Mount Pisgah.

F. Analysis As noted previously, the 1,305 acre Willamette Confluence Preserve borders the entire northern boundary of Howard Buford Recreation Area and also abuts land owned by Friends of Buford Park and Mt. Pisgah and the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department. Dorris Ranch Park and Clearwater Park are two Willamalane Parks located on the opposite bank of the Middle Fork directly to the north.

Conservation easements held by OWEB and BPA are a key element of the short and long-term management of the Preserve. The easements define the conservation values, define the rights of the easement holders, and identify activities that are prohibited under the terms of the easements. The easements identify the Preserve Management Plan as the document that describes how the land owner will preserve, protect, restore, and enhance the conservation values of the Preserve.

There are a number of issues and concerns that the future owner of the Willamette Confluence Preserve must address. The Questionnaire response was the initial effort in starting the dialogue with TNC and the conservation easement holders. This Questionnaire response is included as an attachment to this memo. Subsequent to submitting the questionnaire, during the time interval when TNC and the review

Page 4 of 6 committee were evaluating the response, Parks organized three site visits to continue the dialogue with TNC, the easement holders, and other stakeholders. These site tours included a June 29, 2019, site visit with the Lane Count Parks Advisory Committee and an August 5, 2019, site visit with TNC staff, representatives from OWEB and BPA, and other partners. This site visit included staff from the University of Oregon Institute for Policy Research and Engagement (IPRE), who we discussed contracting to assist with some of the planning work required with the acquisition process. A third site visit was made on October 31, 2019, with Public Works staff, the City of Springfield, and other partners.

On October 30, 2019, TNC and the questionnaire review committee completed their review and sent Parks a response letter. The response letter is included as an attachment to this memo. The response letter identified concerns that the review committee had about Lane County’s ability to address the long-term stewardship of the property.

Specifically, the letter stated:

“The consensus of The Nature Conservancy and the review team is that we have significant concerns about the viability of a transfer to Lane County at this time. We are considering not moving any further with a proposed transfer to Lane County at this time; however, before making a final decision, we want to share our concerns and offer Lane County and partners an opportunity to discuss and respond.” As a follow-up to receipt of this letter, Parks organized a meeting with TNC and the review committee members on November 25, 2019, to further discuss the concerns that arose in the review and identify agreed-upon steps to take to move forward. These steps included the following: (1) Parks and TNC update the Rivers to Ridges Executive Team with the status of the transfer at the annual meeting on December 6, 2019, (2) TNC establish a work plan for a baseline and habitat management plan for review from the easement holders, (3) Parks update their partners on the outcome of the meeting, (4) TNC contact McKenzie River Trust (MRT) about their interest in a management role for the property, (5) Parks share the scope of work with the Parks Funding Task Force project, (6) TNC share the University of Oregon research project scope of work looking into the impacts that visitors have on trails and wildlife, and (7) Parks share a link to the recently adopted Howard Buford Recreation Area (HBRA) Habitat Management Plan. Subsequent to the November 25th meeting, Parks had no further communication with TNC on substantive issues. However, Parks was notified on January 30, 2020, that TNC discussed a possible transfer of ownership with MRT. Subsequently, Parks learned that the MRT Board approved a resolution on January 22, 2020, that gave their staff authority to perform due diligence and discuss further with TNC what role they might play as a future owner of the Preserve. During that Board meeting, MRT was discussed as a potential long-term owner or another interim owner, with options for transfer to another group at a later date. Parks reached out to MRT who assured that if they

Page 5 of 6 PARKS FUNDING TASK FORCE

AGENDA Wednesday, April 1, 2020

5:30 pm Dinner (Task Force/Staff) – Lowell Room Willamette Building 6:00pm Public Meeting Session - Goodson Room 3040 N. Delta Hwy., Eugene, OR 97408

PFTF Meeting I. Call Meeting to Order and Introductions – (5 min)

II. Public Comment – (10 min)

III. Review and Consider Approval of Minutes of the February 5, 2020 Task Force Meeting – (5 min)

IV. Presentation and Discussion of Lane County Discretionary Funding Sources – Christine Moody, Lane County Budget & Financial Planning Manager (20 min)

V. Presentation and Discussion of Deferred Maintenance and Preferred Level of Service – Brett Henry, Parks Division Manager; Todd Bowen, Parks Maintenance Supervisor (25 min)

VI. Facilitate Discussion Regarding Scope of Services & Prioritize Services – Bob Keefer, Sr. Consultant (30 min)

VII. Facilitate Brainstorm Session on Additional Funding Mechanisms – Bob Keefer, Sr. Consultant (20 min)

VIII. Establish Meeting Calendar for 2020 – (5 min)

IX. Adjourn

ACTION PLAN WORKGROUP

AGENDA Monday, March 2, 2020

5:00 – 6:30 pm Public Meeting Session - Wildcat Room Customer Service Building 3050 N. Delta Hwy., Eugene, OR 97408

ACTION PLAN WORKGROUP Meeting

I. Introductions – (2 min.)

II. Public Comment – (up to 10 min.)

III. Overview of Assignment – all (5 min.)

IV. Evaluation Criteria (30 min.)

V. Scoring Matrix Methodology (30 min.)

VI. Meeting Wrap-up/Assignments – (5 min.)

VII. Adjourn

Agenda

Park Maintenance Symposium Date: February 27th Time: 8:30am-12:30pm Location: Adult Activity Center, 215 W. ‘C’ Street, Springfield

Attending Agencies: City of Eugene Parks and Open Space, Lane County Parks, Willamalane Park and Recreation District

Schedule 1. 8:30-9am – Welcome, Coffee and Breakfast Goodies

2. 9-9:15am – Introductions

3. 9:15-11:15am – Discussion Topic Sessions

4. 11:15-11:30am – Break/Travel to Site Visit

5. 11:30am-12:30pm – Site Visit Lunch & Learn (Island Park) Volunteer Program Update for Parks Advisory Committee – March 2020

 Work party event scheduling o SOLVE Spring Beach Clean Up at Heceta Beach and North Jetty o Save the Dunes wants to do a scotch broom clean up at the North Jetty in the coming weeks o A local business work party at Zumwalt Park for late March early April o Hileman Park Work Party with McKenzie River Trust for a watershed Wednesday, date is TBD o FOPM Work party scheduled for 3/21 at 9 am o Crilly Nature Trail clean up with McKenzie Watershed Council and Coburg Community Charter School – planning phases o McKenzie River Clean up scheduled for June 27th will be based out of Armitage Park, last year it was based out of Hendricks Bridge. The idea is to make the location more centrally located in a bigger park.  Adopt a Park Program o Agreement is approved and ready for use by County Counsel. I will now begin to review the agreements and write them for Friends of Zumwalt Park, Friends of Orchard Point Marina and Fall Creek Friends Association o The union review process does not have an update as of now. I have sent part of my Volunteer Management Policy to Labor Relations and we are waiting to hear the next steps. An MOU will need to be created for the program which will take time, hoping to have it implemented by summer.  Friends of Orchard Point Marina work party planning for March 21st o Flyers were placed at Orchard Point and in the surrounding area. I have heard from people who have seen the flyers and provided positive feedback. Carl sent an email to the group and I believe had some positive responses. The event is advertised on Facebook as well.  Tools purchased for program – starter tools, more to come.  Social media update o Instagram and Facebook have been live one month as of March 7th. We have done some paid promotions so far which have done really well and are getting more followers by the day which is positive.  Brochures and Flyers and other graphic material o Created one brochure and one flyer, waiting on quotes for printing. Plan to print brochures in large quantity and flyers for kiosks in parks and events. o Stickers are in the process of being ordered, plan to give these to volunteers and park goers at the County Fair.  Website is under construction and will be unveiled by April 1st

Lane County Parks Operations Report for February

The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of operational highlights for the month.

Maintenance Staff:

Coast Zone  Replaced roofs on Camp Lane buildings  Remodeled Camp Lane house  Pruned trees at North Jetty Park  Worked on North Jetty parking lots  Mowing at all Coastal parks

Valley Zone  Removed corroded storm water culvert at Richardson Park swim bay  Repaired public restroom #3 doors at Richardson Park  Vandalism repair of Armitage hilltop restroom showers  Baker Bay footbridge replacement  Swim bay repair at Richardson  Installed card reader machines at Richardson. Baker Bay and Hendricks  Tree clean up and removal at Baker Bay campground  Mowing at all valley parks

Natural Areas Program:

Lane County Parks Natural Areas Operations Report for February 2020 - Ed Alverson

 During Winter Quarter 2020, Bart Johnson from the University of Oregon Landscape Architecture Dept. is teaching a studio that is considering design questions around the summit area of Mt. Pisgah. I was an official project reviewer of student’s designs at the mid-term review session on 2/10. A brief story on the studio was aired on KLCC radio on 2/17, and is archived at: https://www.klcc.org/post/uo-students-re-imagine-mt-pisgah-summit

 I organized and facilitated the 2020 Willamette Valley Habitat Management and Restoration Meeting, which was held at the ODFW Headquarters in Salem on February 26th, 2020, and attended by 75-100 habitat management professionals, public land managers, and private land owners.

Lane County Parks • 3050 N. Delta Hwy. • Eugene, Oregon 97408 • 541.682.2000 • FAX 541.682.2009 Information: www.lanecounty.org/parks Reservations: http://ecomm.lanecounty.org/parks

Recreate With Us…You’ll Be Glad You Did!

 Implementation of an OWEB small grant for wet prairie restoration at Kinney Park continued this month. We had a crew from Northwest Youth Corps in the park working on the project during the week of 2/17-22.

 I participated in a meeting (2/24) of the Lane County Community Wildfire Prevention Plan Fuels Subcommittee, and prepared a draft list of “fire prone” plants that are problematic for planting within the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI).

 I was involved in the 2/25 presentation to the Board of County Commissioners to update them on the Willamette Confluence Preserve and the response we received to our questionnaire response submittal. I wrote the board memo and participated in the presentation.

 I co-led a field trip on 2/12 to the 2019 wildfire area at HBRA with students from the University of Oregon Environmental Leadership Program.

 I attended and participated in the first Parks Funding Task Force meeting on 2/5

 I organized and facilitated the HBRA Quarterly Stakeholder meeting on 2/6

 On 2/24, I participated in the Friends of Buford Park Trails Committee meeting and a 2/20 field trip by the Trails Committee to review and discuss adjustments to the alignment of the mowed path in the North Bottomlands.

Administration:

 Attended, presented, and participated in the first Parks Funding Task Force meeting on 2/5

 Manager’s ride along with Parks maintenance staff on 2/12

 Participated in the Hendricks Bridge Project bid opening and bid recap on 2/25

 Presented an update to the Willamette Confluence Preserve to the Board of County Commissioners on 2/25

 Assisted Willamalane and City of Eugene Parks with facilitating Parks Maintenance Symposium on 2/26

 Facilitated the Action Plan Workgroup meeting on 3/2

 Armitage Park tree survey preparation and mapping

 FY 21 Budget prep