Environmental Assessment Report for the Lokichar Oil Fields in Turkana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Assessment Report for the Lokichar Oil Fields in Turkana Environmental Baseline Assessment in Lokichar and Lamu Marine Terminal Environmental Assessment Report for the Lokichar Oil Fields in Turkana County and Lamu Marine Crude Oil Terminal Environmental Assessment Report for the Lokichar Oil Fields in Turkana County and Lamu Marine Crude Oil Terminal 1 Environmental Assessment Report for the Lokichar Oil Fields in Turkana County and Lamu Marine Crude Oil Terminal ACKNOWLEDGMENT We would like to thank all those who have contributed to this Environmental and health baseline study in Lokichar oil fields and Lamu marine crude terminal study. In particular, we acknowledge the area chiefs, Kenya Wildlife Service, Kenya Forest Research Institute, Lamu Referral hospital, Health centres, Kenya Maritime Authority, Kenya Forest Service, who have actively participated as key informants and provided information during the study. We would also like to thank Nancy Githaiga – Head of Conservation Programmes, WWF-Kenya for her review and input to the report. 2 Environmental Assessment Report for the Lokichar Oil Fields in Turkana County and Lamu Marine Crude Oil Terminal List of Authors Sumaya Mohamed-Project officer, Oil for development, WWF Kenya Muturi Kamau-National Coordinator-Kenya Oil and Gas Working Group Jackson Kiplagat-Regional Sustainable Investment Manager, WWF Kenya Prof. Jacob Kithinji-Consultant Vitalis Too-Consultant Stanley Chasia- Consultant Enock Osoro- Consultant Design Layout: Anthony Diang’a - Digital Marketing and Design, WWF-Kenya Front-page photo: ©Judy Kosgei / WWF-Kenya This report was supported by the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation – (Norad) through WWF Norway. Views in the document do not necessarily reflect those of Norad or WWF-Norway World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), is one of the world´s largest independent environmental organisations with more than 5 million supporters, as many as 25 million followers in social media, offices in more than 100 countries, over 6,000 employees and more than 1.000 active conservation projects. WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by conserving the world’s biological diversity, ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable, promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. Publishing office A WWF-Kenya Production WWF-Kenya Production Published in October 2020 by World Wide Fund for Nature - Kenya (WWF-Kenya). Reproduction of this report, partially or in whole, must refer to the report´s title and to WWF-Kenya. This work was carried out in cooperation with local communities and local organisations. Any potential errors and/or deficiencies in the report are the authors own responsibility. © 2020 WWF-Kenya All rights reserved 3 Environmental Assessment Report for the Lokichar Oil Fields in Turkana County and Lamu Marine Crude Oil Terminal TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgment 2 Abbreviations and Acronym 5 Units of Measurement 5 List of Tables 6 Table of Figures 6 Executive Summary 7 1. Introduction 11 1.1 Background 11 1.2 Objectives and Scope Of The Work 11 1.3 Approach and Methodology 11 2. Regulatory Framework 13 2.1 The Constitution of Kenya, 2010 13 2.2 The Environmental Management and Coordination Act (Emca), Cap 387 13 2.3 Wildlife Conservation and Management Act, 2013 14 3. Site Description And Baseline Information 15 3.1 Study Area 15 3.2 Physical Environmental Conditions 15 3.3 Biological Environment 20 3.4 Socio-Economic and Cultural Environment 24 4. Air Quality, Noise, Water and Soil Quality Measurements 28 4.1 Sample Sites 28 4.2 Air Quality Measurements 30 4.3 Noise Levels Measurement 36 4.4 Water Quality 37 4.5 Soil Quality Test 40 5. Effects of Environmental Pollution 42 5.1 Impacts of Increased Noise Levels to Human Health 42 5.2 Impacts of Increased Particulate Matter to Human Health 42 5.3 Health Effects of Sulphur Dioxide (So2) 42 5.4 Health Effects of Nitrogen Dioxide (No2) 43 5.5 Disease Caused by Water Pollution 43 5.6 Soil Pollution 43 Conclusions and Recommendations 45 6.1 Conclusions 45 6.2 Recommendations 47 References 49 Appendices 50 4 Environmental Assessment Report for the Lokichar Oil Fields in Turkana County and Lamu Marine Crude Oil Terminal ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYM UNITS OF MEASUREMENT µg Microgram G Grams Ph Negative log10 of the hydrogen ion concentration expressed in mol/L Kg Kilograms TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons µg Microgram Ga Gallium ng Nanogram As Arsenic nm Nanometre Ag Silver ml Millilitre Cd Cadmium L Litre Cs Cesium µL Microlitre Ti Titanium µS Micro Siemens Pb Lead ppm Parts per million EA Environmental Audit M3 Meters cubed EIA Environmental Impact Assessment µg/m3 Micrograms per meter cubed EMP Environmental Management Plan?? DB Decibels EN Endangered Species GPS Global Positioning System IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature KFS Kenya Forest Service KWS Kenya Wildlife Service Leq Equivalent Continuous Noise Level / Sound Level NEMA National Environmental Management Authority NGO Non-Governmental Organization PM Particulate Matter PPM Parts per Million TCU True Color Unit TDS Total Dissolved Solids TH Total Hardness TON Threshold Odor Number 5 Environmental Assessment Report for the Lokichar Oil Fields in Turkana County and Lamu Marine Crude Oil Terminal LIST OF TABLES Table E0 2. Noise levels measurements 10 Table E0 1. Air quality results 11 Table E0 3. Results of water sample analysis from Lokichar oil fields in Turkana County 12 Table 1 1. Stakeholder list in Lamu and Lokichar 15 Table 2 1. Description of the subsidiary legislation under the EMCA Cap 387 17 Table 3 1. Vegetation classification in Lokichar 26 Table 3 2. A summary of fauna in both Lamu and Lokichar basins 29 Table 3 3. Prevalent diseases in Lokichar and Lamu areas 32 Table 4 1. Sampling sites, GPS coordinates and the main economic activity 36 Table 4 2. Air quality exposure levels 37 Table 4 3. Noise levels measurements 45 Table 4 4. Results of water sample analysis from Lokichar oil fields in Turkana County 45 Table 4 5. Result of water quality analysis from Lamu crude oil terminal site 46 Table 4 6. Result of soil analysis from Lokichar oil fields in Turkana County 48 Table 4 7. Result of soil analysis from Lamu marine crude oil terminal site in Lamu County 49 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 3 1. Project site location - Lamu 19 Figure 3 2. Location of Lokichar oil fields study site 20 Figure 3 3.soil characteristics in Lamu study area 22 Figure 3 4. Soil characteristics of Lokichar oil fields study area 23 Figure 3 5.5 - (a) Mangrove trees near the Lamu port terminal, (b) Palm trees and shrubs near Hindi 24 Figure 3 6. Land use/cover - Lamu crude oil terminal 24 Figure 3 7. Vegetation characteristic - Lokichar basin 25 Figure 3 8. Vegetation characteristics study area - Lokichar 26 Figure 3 9. Vegetation characteristics in the Lamu study area 28 Figure 3 10. Settlement patterns and population distribution - Lamu and surroundings 31 Figure 3 11. Settlement patterns and population distribution around Lokichar basin 32 Figure 3 12. Disease prevalent in Lamu County for a period of nine years 33 Figure 3 13. Diseases prevalent in Lokichar, Turkana County for a period of nine years 33 Figure 4 1. Distribution of sampled sites in the Lamu crude oil terminal study area 35 Figure 4 2. Sample sites at Lokichar oil fields study area 36 6 Environmental Assessment Report for the Lokichar Oil Fields in Turkana County and Lamu Marine Crude Oil Terminal EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WWF Kenya and KOGWG commissioned an environmental assessment for the Lokichar oil fields in Turkana and the Lamu marine terminal in Hindi, Lamu County. The objectives of the study were to conduct baselines for water quality, air quality and soil quality. Similarly, the study focused to document the current status of noise, population and settlement patterns, wildlife, vegetation cover and forest cover. It also aimed at establishing the baselines on health and documented the effects of air pollution as well as impacts of increased level of particulate matter to human health. The report provides a tracking tool for environmental quality audits for monitoring changes in the environment over time. A total of 18 sites were sampled in Lamu area within the project site composed on soil, air, water, vegetation, health centers and schools. Wildlife corridors were also sampled and mapped where many giraffe families were spotted grazing near Msanga area. Both soil and water samples were collected concurrently from nearby wells and water distribution points i.e. Hindi at the jetty in Mkowe and inside the Lamu port harbor. Air samples were collected in Mkowe, inside Lamu Port harbor and at the Chief’s office in Hindi/Magogoni Location. While in Lokichar oil fields, a total of six (6) sites were sampled for water, soil, air and health data from the nearby Lokichar dispensary. All samples were picked concurrently for soil and water samples. The parameters were measured using the WHO and NEMA guidelines and standards. The development of the Lokichar oil fields, the Lokichar-Lamu crude oil pipeline as well as the Lamu marine terminal is expected to bring social and economic development at the local and national level, but if not properly managed, can result into lasting impacts to the environment and the people. In order to assess the environment, WWF and partners conducted the assessment and identified the following issues; 1. Inefficient Pollution Prevention Mechanism. High Carbon Dioxide concentration have been noted in Ngamia 1, Ngamia 3 and Amosing fields in Lokichar which was high at 532 ppm. The effects of environmental pollution considered in this study revealed - 2. Increasing levels of Respiratory Tract Infections. Both in Lamu and Lokichar, respiratory tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection has been reported.
Recommended publications
  • ESIA Terms of Reference ESIA for the Lokichar to Lamu Crude Oil Pipeline Project
    REPORT ESIA Terms of Reference ESIA for the Lokichar to Lamu Crude Oil Pipeline Project Submitted to: NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (NEMA) Popo Road, South C, off Mombasa Road P.O.BOX 67839-00200, Nairobi Kenya Submitted by: Golder Associates (UK) Ltd and ESF Consultants Woodlands Office Park, 1C Suite 1st Floor, Woodlands road, Off Lenana Road. P.O. Box, 7745-00100, Nairobi, Kenya Cavendish House, Bourne End Business Park, Cores End Road, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire, SL8 5AS, UK Kenya: +254 736100205 UK: +44 0 1628 851851 1772867.523.A.1 3 October 2018 3 October 2018 1772867.523.A.1 Distribution List NEMA - 3 print copy; 1 copy pdf PPMT / Tullow Oil K.V. - 1 copy pdf ESF Consultants - 1 copy pdf Golder Associates (UK) Limited - 1 copy i 3 October 2018 1772867.523.A.1 Glossary of Terms AGI Above Ground Infrastructure AOI Area of Interest BAT Best Available Technology Bopd Barrels of oil per day CBO Community Based Organisation CPF Central Processing Facility CSO Civil Society Organisation ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan FEED Front End Engineering Design GIS Geographic Information System HDD Horizontal Directional Drilling HG Hunter - gatherer ICP Informed Consultation and Participation JDA Joint Development Agreement LAPSSET Lamu Port, South Sudan, Ethiopia Transport Corridor LCDA LAPSSET Corridor Development Authority LLCOP Lokichar to Lamu Crude Oil Pipeline LLTS Long Line Trace System LOF Load- Out Facility NEMA National Environment Management Authority NGO Non
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Mapping & Context Analysis
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA TURKANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT FINAL REPORT NATURAL RESOURCE MAPPING AND CONTEXT ANALYSIS JUNE 2015 Natural Resource Mapping – Turkana County – April – May 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................. 8 Preface .................................................................................................................... 10 Forward ................................................................................................................... 11 Acknowledgement .................................................................................................... 12 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 14 Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................... 15 Chapter 2: Rationale for Natural Resource Mapping in Turkana County ................... 19 Chapter 3: The Natural Resource Mapping Process .................................................. 24 Chapter 4: Water Resources ..................................................................................... 26 Chapter 4: Water Resources ..................................................................................... 26 4.0 Water Resources Availability and Potential ...................................................... 26 4.1 Groundwater Resources .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Acts/Miningact No12of2016.Pdf on May, 20 2017 26
    1 An Assessment of Social Investments in the Extractives Sector in Kenya; Case Study of Turkana County August 2017 2 An Assessment of Social Investments in the Extractives Sector in Kenya; A Case Study of Turkana County All rights reserved. LDGI encourages the reproduction and dissemination of material in this study report. These Non-commercial uses will be authorized by LDGI free of charge upon request. The Reproduction of this report for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate LDGI copyright materials, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] © LDGI, 2017 For copies of this publication, contact LDGI. Email: [email protected] ISBN 978-9966-107-62-6 This publication was produced by LDGI with support from the Ford Foundation. The views expressed herein represent the findings of the study, and interpretation by the research team, and do not necessarily represent those of LDGI 3 Acknowledgement The Land Development & Governance Institute (LDGI) would like to acknowledge the contribution of, and support from various individuals and institutions during the design and implementation of this study: The researchers and the LDGI staff for providing technical and logistical support throughout the course of the study. Community members drawn from within Lokichar Basin in Turkana County (Turkana South and Turkana East sub- counties), for taking time off their daily activities to engage with the researchers and contribute in focus group discussions and key informant interviews. The information provided by community members informed the greater part of the study and without the information obtained from them, the study would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Tullow Oil Company in Lokichar Location of Turkana South Sub-County
    UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL WORK The Influence of Oil Exploration on the Livelihoods of the Turkana Community: A Study of Tullow Oil Company in Lokichar Location of Turkana South Sub-County. JACOB OMONDI OBONGO C50/69004/2013 A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF MASTER OF ARTS DEGREE IN SOCIOLOGY (RURAL SOCIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT), UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI. DECEMBER, 2018 i DECLARATION I hereby declare that this project is my original work and has not been presented for an award in any other University. Name: JACOB OMONDI OBONGO Signature: ……………………………………………………………… Date: ……………………………………………………….. This project has been submitted for examination with my approval as the University Supervisor Name: DR. JAMES GICHURU KARIUKI Signature: ………………………………………………… Date: ……………………………………………………….. ii DEDICATION This paper is dedicated to my late grandparents- Ephraim Obong’o, Rebecca Obong’o, Festus Ochieng’ and Olisa Ochieng’ for seeing the best in me even in my lowest moment. I thank my family and acknowledge their strong support, most importantly this is dedicated to My wife Esther Gathoni, my children George Ogaji, Peter Mwangi and Bilha Achieng’ and my parents George Ogaji Obong’o and Bilha Achieng’ Obong’o for their strong support, positive encouragement and endurance during the trying moments when I was busy with the field work and writing my paper. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank the Almighty Jehovah God for the grace of life, strength, knowledge wisdom and the financial endowment that has enabled me to do and finalize this study. Secondly, recognize and appreciate the guidance, support and positive criticism by my Supervisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • OCC Asio Nal Pa PER
    KENYA’s Regional Diplomacy: PERIPHERAL OR ADAPTIVE PRAGMATISM? KISIANGANI EMMANUEL PER 248 A e 36° 37° 38° 39° 40° Guenal 41° 42° SOUTH Negēlē P Konso SUDAN Administrative 5° Boundary 5° Yabelo KENYA Houdat D Kelem aw a Ch'ew Bahir Todenyang ETHIOPIA Banya Sabarei Lokichokio Mega Dolo Odo Sibiloi National Park 4 4 ° Lake Turkana Banissa ° Ramu Mandera Kakuma (Lake Rudolf) Kaabong Lokwa Kangole Central I. Central Island N. P. Moyale Takaba North Horr NAL Lodwar 3 3 ° l ° e El Wak w Buna k Loiyangalani El Beru Hagia r u South I. T Moroto South Island N. P. Lokichar Marsabit O Marsabit National Park UGANDA Tarbaj 2° Lokori EASTERN Girito 2° South Turkana Nat. Reserve L. Bisinga Baragoi Wajir L. Oputa Losai National Reserve m a Laisamis u S RIFT VALLEY L aga B o r Tot Mbale Mount Elgon N. P. Maralal Game Sanctuary Maralal Log Dif 1 Kitale o a 1 ° ir Habaswein Bo ° Archer's g' g Kisima a SOMALIA Post o N l Lorule Ewas Tororo WESTERN L. Baringo Mado Gashi ASI Webuye Eldoret Busia Marigat Shaba Nat. Res. NORTH- Kinna Liboi Butere Kakamega Nyahururu Isiolo EASTERN Bisanadi a (Thomson's Falls) Meru er Bilis Qooqaani Nanyuki Nat. Res. Rahole Nat. Lak D Meru Nat. Reserve Solai Hagadera L 0° Kisumu Mt. Kenya Park 0° a Londiani 5199 m k T e Nakuru Mt. Kenya Nat. Park North Kora National a na Aberdares Kericho Molo Kitui Reserve Nyeri N. P. Mfangano I. Nat. Garissa V Homa Bay Gilgil Res. i CENTRAL Embu c Kisii t Naivasha o NYANZA Murang'a r L.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Development Plan 2015-2016
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA TURKANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT TURKANA COUNTY SECOND ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2015/16 COUNTY VISION AND MISSION County Vision A prosperous, peaceful and just county with an empowered community enjoying equal opportunities. County Mission To facilitate socio-economic transformatoion of Turkana through sustainanble use of resources to ensure a high quality of life for all residents. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES AND MAPS .....................................................................................................................................V ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................... VI MAP OF TURKANA COUNTY ................................................................................................................................VIII FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................................... IX PREAMBLE AND ACKNOW LEDGEMENTS......................................................................................................... X EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................ XI CHAPTER ONE ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Block 10Bb Seismic Eia Turkana Drilling Consortium
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROJECT REPORT FOR PROPOSED EXPLORATORY OIL AND NATURAL GAS WELL DRILLING PROGRAMME IN BLOCK 10BB: TURKANA SOUTH AND TURKANA CENTRAL BLOCK 10BB SEISMIC EIA TURKANA DRILLING CONSORTIUM (K) LTD Prepared by EarthView GeoConsultants Limited P.O. BOX 10366-00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: 254-20-2496208 Email: [email protected] Earthview Geoconsultants Ltd. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Turkana Drilling Consortium (K) Limited (TDCK) was established in Kenya in 2007 for the purpose of carrying out detailed seismic exploration surveys for oil and gas prospecting in Kenya. As per the Mining Act Cap 309, the company identified block 10BB which is partly located in Turkana south and Turkana central districts in northern Kenya and obtained exclusive prospecting rights (EPR) for oil and gas exploration in this block. The company further signed a production sharing contract (PSC) with the Government of The Republic of Kenya on 25th October 2007 and has subsequently been granted a prospecting license for oil and gas exploration in block 10BB. On the basis of the foregoing, the Company is proposing to carry out 2D and 3D seismic exploration surveys in parts of the assigned block so as to assess its potential for oil and gas reserves and to locate traps where such reserves may be occurring. Block 10BB, as demarcated by National Oil Corporation of Kenya (NOCK) for the purpose of oil and gas exploration, and herein referred to as the project area or study area is partly located in Turkana south and partly in Turkana central districts in northern Kenya. The project area covers Lokichar/Loperat Mesozoic sedimentary basin which is bound by NNW trending lineaments associated with mobile belts at depth.
    [Show full text]
  • ESIA Nginyang-Lokichar Road Revesed Report-Final
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTSTUDY REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED UPGRADING OF THE NGINYANG’-LOKORI-LOKICHAR ROAD (C113 /C46 ) TO BITUMEN STANDARDS August 2016 Submitted By : Submitted to: Environmental Department Director General Otieno Odongo & Partners Kenya National Highway Authority Consulting Engineers P.O. Box 49712-00100 P.O. Box 54021-00200, Nairobi Nairobi, Kenya Fax 254 020 38701 Email: info@kenh a.co.ke Email:info@ coo pafrica.com 1 Document Authentication: This report is prepared for and on behalf of: Kenya National Highway Authority (KENHA) P.O. Box 49712-00100 NAIROBI-KENYA Signed by:…………………… Position............................................ Signature: …………………………. Date ……………………………. Otieno Odongo & Partners Consulting Engineers (a registered firm of experts with the National Environment Management Authority bearing license No. 1596 confirm that the contents of this report are a true representation of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the proposed upgrading of the Ng’inyang-Lokori-Lokichar Road (C113/C46) to bitumen standard. Signed by: Firm of Environmental Experts: Otieno Odongo & Partners Consulting Engineers Signature ………………………………………………………… Date: ............................................. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The Government of the Republic of Kenya (GoK) through the Development vote has assigned Otieno Odongo & Partners Consulting Engineers to undertake Preliminary and Detailed Engineering Design for upgrading the Ng’inyang – Lokori – Lokichar Road (C113/C46) to bitumen standards. The Project Road is under the management of the Kenya National Highways Authority (KeNHA). The road is an existing alignment and it traverses several sub counties namely East Pokot, Turkana Central, Turkana East and Turkana South located in two Counties namely Baringo and Turkana County of the Rift Valley Region. The road which is currently an earth road in some sections and narrowing to a path in others due to over grown bushes measures approximately 200km.
    [Show full text]
  • ESIA) Foundation Stage Development (FSD
    ANNEX II Foundation Stage Development (FSD) Upstream oil production in South Lokichar Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Submitted to: National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) Submitted by: Golder Cavendish House, Bourne End Business Park, Cores End Road Bourne End, Buckinghamshire, SL8 5AS, UK +44 (0) 1628 851851 Ecologic Consultants Ltd P.P. Box 55533, City Square, Nairobi, Kenya June 2020 1433956.637.A2 ANNEX II Signature Page DRAFT DRAFT Philip Abuor Andrew Morsley NEMA EIA Lead Expert Project Director (Registration No. 9709) Ecologic Consultants Ltd Golder Associates (UK) Ltd 12 June 2020 June 2020 1433956.637.A2 ANNEX II A Stakeholder Engagement Plan B Stakeholder Engagement Consultation Material (Pending) C Stakeholder Engagement Consultation Report (Pending) June 2020 1433956.637.A2 ANNEX II Stakeholder Engagement Plan A June 2020 1433956.637.A2 REPORT Foundation Stage Development ESIA Stakeholder Engagement Plan Submitted to: Tullow Kenya BV Building 9 Chiswick Park 566 Chiswick High Road London W4 5XT Submitted by: Golder Associates (UK) Ltd Cavendish House, Bourne End Business Park, Cores End Road, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire, SL8 5AS, UK +44 0 1628 851851 1433956.616/A.2 September 2019 September 2019 1433956.616/A.2 Distribution List Tullow Kenya B.V. - 1 copy (pdf) Golder Associates (UK) - 1 copy (pdf) i September 2019 1433956.616/A.2 Glossary of terms Environmental and Social Baseline: A component of an ESIA process undertaken to develop an understanding of the existing environmental and socio-economic conditions in the areas that may be affected by a Project. Baseline studies provide a basis for analysis of potential positive and negative impacts of a Project in the ESIA and, where possible, provides information for monitoring and measuring impact throughout implementation of the ESMP (see below).
    [Show full text]