Introduction to Architecture 06.09.2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction to Architecture 06.09.2011 INTRODUCTION TO ARCHITECTURE 06.09.2011 Vitruvius: The Education Of The Architect extract from The Ten Books on Architecture written between 27 and 15 BC; translated by Morris Hicky Morgan, in 1914 1. The architect should be equipped with knowledge of many branches of study and varied kinds of learning, for it is by his judgement that all work done by the other arts is put to test. This knowledge is the child of practice and theory. Practice is the continuous and regular exercise of employment where manual work is done with any necessary material according to the design of a drawing. Theory, on the other hand, is the ability to demonstrate and explain the productions of dexterity on the principles of proportion. 2. It follows, therefore, that architects who have aimed at acquiring manual skill without scholarship have never been able to reach a position of authority to correspond to their pains, while those who relied only upon theories and scholarship were obviously hunting the shadow, not the substance. But those who have a thorough knowledge of both, like men armed at all points, have the sooner attained their object and carried authority with them. 3. In all matters, but particularly in architecture, there are these two points:- the thing signified, and that which gives it its significance. That which is signified is the subject of which we may be speaking; and that which gives significance is a demonstration on scientific principles. It appears, then, that one who professes himself an architect should be well versed in both directions. He ought, therefore, to be both naturally gifted and amenable to instruction. Neither natural ability without instruction nor instruction without natural ability can make the perfect artist. Let him be educated, skilful with the pencil, instructed in geometry, know much history, have followed the philosophers with attention, understand music, have some knowledge of medicine, know the opinions of the jurists, and be acquainted with astronomy and the theory of the heavens. www.pritzkerprize.com youtube - Charlie Rose - Pritzker Prize The Pritzker Architecture Prize is awarded annually by the Hyatt Foundation to honor "a living architect whose built work demonstrates a combination of those qualities of talent, vision and commitment, which has produced consistent and significant contributions to humanity and the built environment through the art of architecture". Founded in 1979 by Jay A. Pritzker and his wife Cindy, the award is funded by the Pritzker family and is considered to be one of the world's premier architecture prizes; it is often referred to as the Nobel Prize of architecture. The prize is awarded "irrespective of nationality, race, creed, or ideology"; the recipients receive US$100,000, a citation certificate, and since 1987, a bronze medallion. The Latin inscription on the reverse of the medallion— firmitas, utilitas, venustas (English: durability, utility, and beauty) - is inspired by Roman architect Vitruvius. The jury, each year consisting of five to nine "experts ... recognized professionals in their own fields of architecture, business, education, publishing, and culture", deliberate early the following year before announcing the winner in spring. Inaugural winner Philip Johnson was cited "for 50 years of imagination and vitality embodied in a myriad of museums, theaters, libraries, houses, gardens and corporate structures". Philip Johnson - 1979 b. USA, 1906; d. 2005 Philip Johnson was a museum director, writer, and, most notably, an architect known for his unconventional designs. His work incorporated diverse influences such as the neoclassicism and the modernism. After graduation from Harvard in 1930, Philip Johnson became the first Director of the Department of Architecture at the Museum of Modern Art, New York. He coined the term International Style and introduced the work of modern European architects such as Ludwig Mies van der Rohe and Le Corbusier to America. Johnson returned to Harvard University in 1940 to study architecture under Marcel Breuer. For his master degree thesis, he designed a residence for himself, the now famous Glass House (1949), which has been called one of the world's most beautiful and yet least functional homes. He would later collaborate with Mies van der Rohe on what is considered the most superb skyscraper in North America, the Seagram Building in New York City (1958). Philip Johnson's buildings were luxurious in scale and materials, featuring expansive interior space and a classical sense of symmetry and elegance. In 1979, Philip Johnson was honored with the first Pritzker Architecture Prize in recognition of "50 years of imagination and vitality embodied in a myriad of museums, theatres, libraries, houses, gardens and corporate structures." Peter Zumthor - 2009 b. Switzerland, 1943 Peter Zumthor is a master architect admired by his colleagues around the world for work that is focused, uncompromising and exceptionally determined. He has conceived his method of practice almost as carefully as each of his projects. For 30 years, he has been based in the remote village of Haldenstein in the Swiss mountains, removed from the flurry of activity of the international architectural scene. There, together with a small team, he develops buildings of great integrity—untouched by fad or fashion. Declining a majority of the commissions that come his way, he only accepts a project if he feels a deep affinity for its program, and from the moment of commitment, his devotion is complete, overseeing the project‟s realization to the very last detail. His buildings have a commanding presence, yet they prove the power of judicious intervention, showing us again and again that modesty in approach and boldness in overall result are not mutually exclusive. Humility resides alongside strength. While some have called his architecture quiet, his buildings masterfully assert their presence, engaging many of our senses, not just our sight but also our senses of touch, hearing and smell. Zumthor has a keen ability to create places that are much more than a single building. His architecture expresses respect for the primacy of the site, the legacy of a local culture and the invaluable lessons of architectural history. The Kolumba Museum in Cologne, for example, is not only a startling contemporary work but also one that is completely at ease with its many layers of history. Here, Zumthor has produced a building that emerges from the remains of a bombed church in the most inevitable and lyrical of ways, intertwining place and memory in an entirely new palimpsest. This has always been the compelling character of this architect‟s work, from the singular yet universal breath of faith inscribed in the tiny field chapel in the village of Wachendorf, Germany, to the mineral mist in the thermal baths at Vals, Switzerland. For him, the role of the architect is not just to construct a fixed object but also to anticipate and choreograph the experience of moving through and around a building. In Zumthor‟s skillful hands, like those of the consummate craftsman, materials from cedar shingles to sandblasted glass are used in a way that celebrates their own unique qualities, all in the service of an architecture of permanence. The same penetrating vision and subtle poetry are evident in his writings as well, which, like his portfolio of buildings, have inspired generations of students. In paring down architecture to its barest yet most sumptuous essentials, he has reaffirmed architecture‟s indispensable place in a fragile world. For all of these reasons, Peter Zumthor is the recipient of the 2009 Pritzker Architecture Prize. "I believe that architecture today needs to reflect on the tasks and possibilities which are inherently its own. Architecture is not a vehicle or a symbol for things that do not belong to its essence. In a society that celebrates the inessential, architecture can put up a resistance, counteract the waste of forms and meanings, and speak its own language. I believe that the language of architecture is not a question of a specific style. Every building is built for a specific use in a specific place and for a specific society. My buildings try to answer the questions that emerge from these simple facts as precisely and critically as they can." Thinking Architecture by Peter Zumthor 1998 The 34th and most recent winners Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa were cited for "architecture that is simultaneously delicate and powerful, precise and fluid, ingenious but not overly or overtly clever". SANAA - 2010 Kazuyo Sejima (born in Japan 1956) and Ryue Nishizawa (born in Japan 1966) For more than 15 years, architects Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa have worked together in their collaborative partnership, SANAA, where it is virtually impossible to untangle which individual is responsible for what aspect of a particular project. Each building is ultimately a work that comes from the union of their two minds. Together they have produced major commissions, such as the O-Museum in Nagano and the 21st Century Museum of Contemporary Art in Kanazawa (both in Japan), the Glass Pavilion at the Toledo Museum (Ohio), De Kunstline Theater and Cultural Center (Almere, the Netherlands), the New Museum of Contemporary Art (New York, NY), and the recent Rolex Learning Center (Lausanne, Switzerland). The buildings by Sejima and Nishizawa seem deceptively simple. The architects hold a vision of a building as a seamless whole, where the physical presence retreats and forms a sensuous background for people, objects, activities, and landscapes. They explore like few others the phenomenal properties of continuous space, lightness, transparency, and materiality to create a subtle synthesis. Sejima and Nishizawa‟s architecture stands in direct contrast with the bombastic and rhetorical. Instead, they seek the essential qualities of architecture that result in a much-appreciated straightforwardness, economy of means, and restraint in their work. This economy of means, however, does not become a simple reductive operation in the architects‟ hands.
Recommended publications
  • “Shall We Compete?”
    5th International Conference on Competitions 2014 Delft “Shall We Compete?” Pedro Guilherme 35 5th International Conference on Competitions 2014 Delft “Shall we compete?” Author Pedro Miguel Hernandez Salvador Guilherme1 CHAIA (Centre for Art History and Artistic Research), Universidade de Évora, Portugal http://uevora.academia.edu/PedroGuilherme (+351) 962556435 [email protected] Abstract Following previous research on competitions from Portuguese architects abroad we propose to show a risomatic string of politic, economic and sociologic events that show why competitions are so much appealing. We will follow Álvaro Siza Vieira and Eduardo Souto de Moura as the former opens the first doors to competitions and the latter follows the master with renewed strength and research vigour. The European convergence provides the opportunity to develop and confirm other architects whose competences and aesthetics are internationally known and recognized. Competitions become an opportunity to other work, different scales and strategies. By 2000, the downfall of the golden initial European years makes competitions not only an opportunity but the only opportunity for young architects. From the early tentative, explorative years of Siza’s firs competitions to the current massive participation of Portuguese architects in foreign competitions there is a long, cumulative effort of competence and visibility that gives international competitions a symbolic, unquestioned value. Keywords International Architectural Competitions, Portugal, Souto de Moura, Siza Vieira, research, decision making Introduction Architects have for long been competing among themselves in competitions. They have done so because they believed competitions are worth it, despite all its negative aspects. There are immense resources allocated in competitions: human labour, time, competences, stamina, expertizes, costs, energy and materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Serpentine Pavilion 2014, Designed by Smiljan Radić 26 June – 19 October 2014 Serpentine Gallery
    Serpentine Pavilion 2014, designed by Smiljan Radić 26 June – 19 October 2014 Serpentine Gallery Press images at serpentinegalleries.org/about/press-page Smiljan Radić is the fourteenth architect to accept the Serpentine’s invitation to design a temporary Pavilion outside the entrance to the Serpentine Gallery in Kensington Gardens. The commission is one of the most anticipated events in the cultural calendar and has become one of London’s leading summer attractions since launching in 2000. Smiljan Radić’s design follows Sou Fujimoto’s cloud-like structure, which was visited by almost 300,000 people in 2013 and was one of the most visited Pavilions to date. Previous Pavilions have been designed Herzog & de Meuron and Ai Weiwei, 2012; Peter Zumthor, 2011; Jean Nouvel, 2010; Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa, SANAA, 2009; Frank Gehry, 2008; Olafur Eliasson and Kjetil Thorsen, 2007; Rem Koolhaas and Cecil Balmond, with Arup, 2006; Álvaro Siza and Eduardo Souto de Moura with Cecil Balmond, Arup, 2005; MVRDV with Arup, 2004 (un-realised); Oscar Niemeyer, 2003; Toyo Ito and Cecil Balmond - with Arup, 2002; Daniel Libeskind with Arup, 2001; and Zaha Hadid, who designed the inaugural Pavillion in 2000. Occupying a footprint of some 541 square metres on the lawn of the Serpentine Gallery, Radić’s plans depict a semi-translucent, cylindrical structure, resting on large quarry stones. Radić’s Pavilion has its roots in his earlier work, particularly the studio model for The Castle of the Selfish Giant, inspired by the Oscar Wilde story, and the Restaurant Mestizo, part of which is supported by large boulders.
    [Show full text]
  • A ARQUITETURA DO LUGAR NA SEGUNDA METADE DO SÉCULO XX Os Casos Da Europa Latina E Do Brasil
    UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA FACULDADE DE ARQUITETURA E URBANISMO PROGRAMA DE PESQUISA E PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO Mário Eduardo Pereira de Araujo A ARQUITETURA DO LUGAR NA SEGUNDA METADE DO SÉCULO XX Os Casos da Europa Latina e do Brasil Brasília 2008 2 MÁRIO EDUARDO PEREIRA DE ARAUJO A ARQUITETURA DO LUGAR NA SEGUNDA METADE DO SÉCULO XX Os Casos da Europa Latina e do Brasil Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada ao Programa de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação da Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de Brasília como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Arquitetura e Urbanismo Orientador: Prof. Dr. Gabriel Dorfman Brasília 2008 3 MÁRIO EDUARDO PEREIRA DE ARAUJO A ARQUITETURA DO LUGAR NA SEGUNDA METADE DO SÉCULO XX Os Casos da Europa Latina e do Brasil Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada ao Programa de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação da Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de Brasília como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Arquitetura e Urbanismo Aprovado em 21 de julho de 2008 BANCA EXAMINADORA ________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Gabriel Dorfman Orientador – Universidade de Brasília ________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Claudio José Pinheiro Vilar de Queiroz Universidade de Brasília ________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Sylvio Jantzen Universidade Federal de Pelotas Brasília 2008 4 À Lidinha, minha esposa, com imenso amor e gratidão. 5 AGRADECIMENTOS É certo que em uma lista (ainda que pequena) de agradecimentos vêm subentendidos alguns nomes que de uma maneira ou de outra colaboraram nesta caminhada. E mais certamente ainda há nomes que jamais poderiam faltar. A Deus, agradeço pelas oportunidades dadas, em especial esta, com a esperança de tê-la aproveitado a contento.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation
    COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND PRESERVATION Spring 2019 ARCHA4349 Modernization and the Modern Project Instructor: Kenneth Frampton Teaching Fellows: Alireza Karbasioun (ak3936), Ife Salema Vanable (isv2104) Teaching Assistant: Taylor Zhai Williams (tzw2111) Class Meeting: Wednesday 11:00am-1:00pm, AVH Ware Lounge Building and architecture are cosmogonic arts; that is to say, they involve the creation of artificial worlds to stand against the chaos of nature and the erosive forces of time. In that sense, architecture is a material culture close to the necessities of food production and the practice of medicine. Irrespective of whether we have in mind the idiosyncrasies of vernacular architecture or the embodiment of power, building culture like all culture entails a mediation between innovation and tradition. At the same time, modernization as an ever-accelerating instrumental process continues relentlessly to such an extent that we are on the verge of losing our former capacity to assimilate in cultural terms the volatility of constantly changing conditions. Modern architecture since its inception has been continuously challenged to find modes of spatial, structural and material organization capable of responding adequately to new and often unprecedented circumstances. This lecture course has been devised in order to convey to young architects the way in which the Modern Movement may be perceived retrospectively as a series of wave-like formations which come into being, rise to their maturity and then fall away as they are overtaken by new impulses responding to totally different conditions. As the following brief history of the Modern Movement attempts to demonstrate, one may look at the past as a sequence of discernable impulses that each have had their own life span.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Congressional Leaders Transmitting Designations Under the Kingpin Act June 1, 2011
    May 30 / Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 The President. Thank you. NOTE: The President spoke at 1:27 p.m. in the Secretary of Commerce Gary F. Locke. Thank State Dining Room at the White House. In his you, Mr. President. remarks, he referred to Julia, Jane, Ruth, and The President. Thank you, everybody. Kathleen Bryson, daughters of Secretary- designate Bryson. Letter to Congressional Leaders Transmitting Designations Under the Kingpin Act June 1, 2011 Dear __________: ranking member, Senate Committee on Armed Services; Max S. Baucus, chairman, and This report to the Congress, under section Orrin G. Hatch, ranking member, Senate 804(a) of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Des- Committee on Finance; John F. Kerry, chair- ignation Act, 21 U.S.C. 1901–1908 (the “King- man, and Richard G. Lugar, ranking member, pin Act”), transmits my designations of the fol- Senate Committee on Foreign Relations; Pat- lowing seven foreign individuals as appropriate rick J. Leahy, chairman, and Charles E. Grass- for sanctions under the Kingpin Act and re- ports my direction of sanctions against them ley, ranking member, Senate Committee on under the Act: the Judiciary; Dianne Feinstein, chairman, and C. Saxby Chambliss, vice chairman, Senate Se- Manuel Torres Felix (Mexico) lect Committee on Intelligence; Howard P. Gonzalo Inzunza Inzunza (Mexico) “Buck” McKeon, chairman, and Adam Smith, Haji Lal Jan Ishaqzai (Afghanistan) ranking member, House Committee on Armed Kamchybek Asanbekovich Kolbayev (Kyr- Services; Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, chairman, and gyzstan) Howard L. Berman, ranking member, House John Harun Mwau (Kenya) Committee on Foreign Affairs; Lamar S. Naima Mohamed Nyakiniywa (Kenya) Smith, chairman, and John J.
    [Show full text]
  • Play with Me – the Pritzker Prize As a Game in Ecology
    KAROLINA MAZURKIEWICZ* PLAY WITH ME – THE PRITZKER PRIZE AS A GAME IN ECOLOGY ZAGRAJ ZE MNĄ – NAGRODA PRITZKERA JAKO GRA W EKOLOGIĘ A b s t r a c t The most prestigious architectural prize is the Pritzker Prize. However, competing for it there is an awareness of participation. In recent years, the award has been given to architects who in their work referred to ecology, sustainable development, regional- ism, and natural and cultural values. Has this architectural game explained the prin- ciples and aimed towards highlighting those whose work concerns cooperation with nature rather than negation? Keywords: Pritzker Prize, sustainable development, traditional architecture, modern architecture S treszczenie Najbardziej prestiżową nagrodą architektoniczną jest Nagroda Pritzkera. Jednak konkurując o nią nie ma się świadomości uczestnictwa. W ostatnich latach nagroda przyznawana była architektom, którzy w swojej twórczości odnosili się do ekolo- gii, zrównoważonego rozwoju, regionalizmu i wartości przyrodniczo-kulturowych. Czyżby ta gra architektoniczna klarowała zasady i zmierzała w kierunku wyróżniania tych, których praca dotyczy współpracy z naturą a nie negacji? Słowa kluczowe: Nagroda Pritzkera, zrównoważony rozwój, architektura tradycyjna, architektura nowoczesna * M.Sc. Eng. Karolina Mazurkiewicz, Department of Architecture of Housing, Industrial, Interior, Ruralistics, Landscape, Visual Arts and Structural Systems, Faculty of Architecture, Wroclaw University of Technology. 197 Progress begins from fun. Antoni Kępiński What do the participants in the largest architectural game play? What are “the judges of Architects’ World Cup” playing? How to select the card to be noticed in the hand of “Architectural Nobel Prize”? Analysing the portfolios and biographies of the architects who for the past five years were awarded the Pritzker Prize, it is difficult to discern the rules of managing this most prestigious of awards.
    [Show full text]
  • Serpentine Gallery Pavilion Commission
    José Selgas & Lucía Cano There is no budget for the Serpentine Gallery Pavilion commission. It is paid for by sponsorship, sponsorship help-in-kind, and the sale of the finished structure, which does not cover more than 40% of its cost. The Serpentine Gallery collaborates with a range of companies and individuals whose support makes it possible to realise the Pavilion. Serpentine Gallery Pavilion Commission The Serpentine Gallery Pavilion commission was conceived by Serpentine Gallery Director, Julia Peyton-Jones, in 2000. It is an ongoing programme of temporary structures by internationally acclaimed architects and designers. It is unique worldwide and presents the work of an international architect or design team who, at the time of the Serpentine Gallery's invitation, has not completed a building in England. Each Pavilion is sited on the Gallery’s lawn for three months and the immediacy of the process – a maximum of six months from invitation to completion – provides a peerless model for commissioning architecture. Park Nights, the Gallery’s acclaimed programme of public talks and events, will take place in Sejima and Nishizawa’s (SANAA’s) Pavilion, and will culminate in the annual Marathon event that takes place in October. In 2006 the Park Nights programme included the now legendary 24-hour Serpentine Gallery Interview Marathon, convened by Hans Ulrich Obrist and architect Rem Koolhaas, which was followed, in 2007, by the Serpentine Gallery Experiment Marathon presented by artist Olafur Eliasson and Obrist, which featured experiments performed by leading artists and scientists. In 2008, Obrist led over 60 participants in the Serpentine Gallery Manifesto Marathon.
    [Show full text]
  • Lord Palumbo 2011 Laureate Eduardo Souto De Moura Ceremony Speech
    Lord Palumbo 2011 Laureate Eduardo Souto de Moura Ceremony Speech Thirty-three years ago, in 1979, in the City of Chicago, Jay and Cindy Pritzker breathed life for the very first time into the Prize that bore their name, and ‘the Pritzker’, as it has been affectionately known ever since, was well and truly on its way. Like a child prodigy, it just couldn’t wait to get going, moving forward in leaps and bounds and vaulting across continents in spectacular fashion like unearthed electric current, to such an extent that it became an article of faith with the family to tether it to a global platform. This was achieved by virtue of the nature of the Prize itself, but also by the masterly decision to alternate the location of these annual Award Ceremonies between the United States as the mother country and selected capital cities overseas. Widespread international recognition generated by this initiative was a major factor in endowing the Prize with the almost mythical status that it has enjoyed until today when that qualifying adverb ‘almost’ finally vanished into the ether as a result of the generosity of the President and First Lady, in attending and participating tonight in the presentation of this most coveted Award. The Prize represents an astonishing record of long term enlightened patronage by the Pritzker family, and in particular by Cindy Pritzker, who has been a tower of strength and a dynamic driving force throughout its history, and who is with us this evening, together with her son Tom (as we have seen) and his wife Margot.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture for Landscape the Natural Environment As the Stage for Design
    YACADEMY HIGH-LEVEL TRAINING COURSE EDITION 2019 ARCHITECTURE FOR LANDSCAPE THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AS THE STAGE FOR DESIGN 1 SUMMARY 03 YACADEMY 05 THE COURSE Overview Structure Calendar 09 PROGRAM Lessons Workshop 17 INTERNSHIPS 24 PAST EDITIONS 29 RULES 2 THE GREATEST INNOVATION IN POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION YAC is an association which promotes archi- tectural competitions aimed at fostering culture and design research. Over the years, YAC has broadened its experience of work and collaboration with the main architectural firms of contemporary archi- tecture, dealing with diverse and numerous topics of architectural design. Nowadays, YAC’s expertise can serve young designers better, providing them with the creation of high-level educational programs aimed at polishing the skills of the students and offering them a valuable connection to the labour market. Thanks to the close relationship with internationally renowned professional and academic actors, YAC is the perfect frame within which complete or specialize one’s skills, and create a significative link with the most internationally-renowned architectural practices. 3 WHERE Via Borgonuovo, 5 Bologna, Italy In the heart of Bologna’s historical city center, close city located at a short distance from Rome, Florence, to the Two Towers and next to Piazza Santo Stefano, Venice and Milan. From Bologna Central Sta tion, it is YACademy is located in a prestigious medieval building just a brief bus ride or a short pleasant walk under which has been renovated to welcome an educational the marvellous porticos to get to YACademy’s head center of excellence which can also count on an ar- quarters: here, among history, innovation and interna- chitectural library of more than 3.000 books donated tionality, the young designer will be able to meet some by Sapienza University.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Tom Pritzker's Ceremony Speech
    Thomas J. Pritzker 2011 Laureate Eduardo Souto de Moura Ceremony Speech The Pritzker Prize was inaugurated in Washington, D.C., at Dumbarton Oaks, back in 1979. While the Prize ceremony has been in dozens of cities around the world, we seem to keep gravitating back to Washington so I have asked myself why. Why Washington? Great architecture serves the people and presents great ideas in a built form. In Washington what we experience is the great idea of democracy, which is embodied in the simplest of phrases: “We the People.” Architecture is the most public of art forms. No other art form serves as many people as architecture. There is hardly a human being on the planet untouched by the designs and the dreams of our architects. Sadly, architecture can also be the handmaiden of less pleasant ideas, as we have seen in the 20th century. In some cases, governments built towering, imposing and often menacing public and governmental structures to overwhelm their citizens. Even these bad ideas leave commentary about the times and the life of the people who lived in those places and in those times. This city demonstrates that there is architecture of the people, an architecture that pulses with democracy. They are about We the People. Here, we see buildings that are welcoming, that nurture the human potential, and that celebrate the human spirit. Indeed, when Washington and Jefferson first laid the plans for our nation’s capitol they went to great lengths to ensure that its designers and architects understood that the capitol had to be imbued with our values.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture
    The Single-family House of Twentieth Century in Nordic Countries and in Portugal: a condition for the housing quality Beatriz Alcoforado Farinha Freire Brinco Thesis to obtain the Master of Science Degree in Architecture Extended Abstract Supervisor: Prof. Doutor Francisco Manuel Caldeira Pinto Teixeira Bastos Examination Committee Chairperson: Prof. Doutora Maria Alexandra de Lacerda Nave Alegre Supervisor: Prof. Doutor Francisco Manuel Caldeira Pinto Teixeira Bastos Members of the Committee: Prof. Doutora Teresa Frederica Tojal de Valsassina Heitor May 2016 2 The main objective of the current dissertation is to establish a condition for quality in single-family housing during the twentieth century, with reference to the Nordic (Finnish, Danish, Swedish and Norwegian) and Portuguese architects. For the fulfillment of all the goals, the thesis is organized as follows. Besides the introduction and the final conclusion, there are three chapters - "A Basis for Architecture Quality", "The Housing Theme in Recent History" and "The Quality of Housing". The theoretical basis of this study is the oldest definition of architectural quality, the one of Vitruvius, who argued that a work has quality when it is at the same time, solid (Firmitas), useful (Utilitas) and beautiful (Venustas). This investigation searched to understand how these principles have evolved over time and their contributions to the theme of architectural quality in general. The principle of solidity corresponds to the constructive nature of architecture and it is associated with the techniques and materials used in the construction of a building. Throughout history, this principle has suffered major changes, however with Critical Regionalism, won his biggest concern with architectural quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Beauty the Scandalous Revolutionary Force of the Past
    Università Iuav di Venezia -W.A.Ve. 2018 Italian Beauty The scandalous revolutionary force of the past Workshop Architettura Venezia 2018 June 25th - July 13th www.wave2018iuav.com www.facebook.com/wave2018iuav/ [email protected] UNIVERSITÀ IUAV DI VENEZIA Iuav is located in One of the first Architecture Schools in Italy (established " in 1926), the Università Iuav di Venezia is a ‘themed’ the most beautiful university totally focusing on design. It is a dedicated place for teaching, specialisation and field research university campus in design of living space and environments such as buildings, cities, landscapes, regions as well as design in the world: the of every-day use objects, cultural, theatrical, multimedia city of Venice events, fashion and graphics. About 5,000 students attend this University. International Exchange Programmes are currently being offered " in cooperation with 130 European universities for the promotion of students’, researchers’ and faculty’s mobility, with a view to developing a common European citizenship, exchange of good practices and sharing of researches. Furthermore, Università Iuav di Venezia has also established cooperation and exchange relationships with non-EU institutions and universities with which has entered into over 60 agreements aiming at students’ mobility. Studying at Iuav means living in an environment that is open to what is happening throughout the world. It means coming face-to-face with authoritative voices in the fields of architecture, regional planning, arts and design: Le Corbusier, Louis Kahn, Frank Lloyd Wright, Carlo Scarpa, Carlo Aymonino, Manfredo Tafuri, Vittorio Gregotti, Gino Valle, Aldo Rossi, Giovanni Astengo, Giancarlo De Carlo, Tadao Ando and Richard Serra have all been part of our school’s history.
    [Show full text]