DOCSLIB.ORG

Engineer Vs. Architect: What's the Difference?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Engineer Vs. Architect: What's the Difference? 4/30/2015 Engineer vs. Architect | RAND Engineering Architecture, DPC Home (/home) ✉ Contact (/contact) MENU Engineer vs. Architect: What's the Difference? By Stephen Varone, AIA and Peter Varsalona, PE I'm the president of a Queens co-op, and several apartments and common areas in our building have suffered serious water damage caused by long-standing leaks from the roof and parapets. An engineer we hired said the roofing system that was installed about five years ago was inferior (and probably not properly installed), and the parapet walls needed to be rebuilt. We have received proposals from this engineer and several other firms for the repair work, but the board is divided over whether an architectural firm or an engineering firm would be better suited for the project. Some members argue that because the underlying roof deck may be damaged we need a structural engineer, while another member says that "architects are for the outside of the building, engineers are for the inside." Is there such a distinction that comes into play with this type of project? We may seek damages against the roofing manufacturer and/or contractor who installed the roof, so if we need to litigate, we want to have the right professional testifying about the previous work. http://www.randpc.com/ask/construction­administration­project­management/engineer­vs­architect/ 1/6 4/30/2015 Engineer vs. Architect | RAND Engineering Architecture, DPC Exterior repair projects can be handled by either an engineer or architect depending on his or her training and experience. A commonly held view shared by not only your board but also much of the general public is that architects are primarily concerned with the design, style, and appearance of a building, while engineers attend to the nitty-gritty details of the building's function. In other words, the thinking goes, the architect cares how the building looks; the engineer cares how it works. While there may be an element of truth to the stereotypes of the two professions—the abstract, artistic architect with the trendy eyeglasses and stylish clothes versus the practical, hands-on engineer with pocket protector and dirt under his fingernails—the reality is more complicated. There are, after all, many engineers who are conceptually and aesthetically oriented and many architects adept at mechanical disciplines. http://www.randpc.com/ask/construction­administration­project­management/engineer­vs­architect/ 2/6 4/30/2015 Engineer vs. Architect | RAND Engineering Architecture, DPC The differences between engineers and architects, while they do exist, are not as great as what the two professions share—the expertise to evaluate, design, and maintain buildings and building systems and provide aesthetically pleasing, safe, well-functioning spaces to work and live. The question is, then, which one is better suited for the particular project at hand? Education and Licensing Engineers and architects receive different degrees in college and each must pass different professional examinations to be licensed. To become a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) in New York State, an engineer has to pass the Principles and Practice of Engineering examination, which is offered in a number of fields, such as civil, electrical, mechanical, and structural engineering. To become a Registered Architect, one must pass the Architect Registration Examination, which covers seven areas, such as Site Planning & Design, Building Systems, and Construction Documentation & Services. The differences between engineers and architects are not as great as what the two professions share. New York State does not specify any engineering or architectural specialty in its licensure: A licensed engineer is simply a PE, not a Structural PE or a Mechanical PE. The same holds true for Registered Architects: An architect who specializes in new building design as opposed to one who is an historic preservation expert both have the same RA title. (The one exception is a landscape architect, which has its own RA designation.) Other than certain restrictions in specialized disciplines or areas, once PE's and RA's are issued their licenses, they are entrusted by the state with the responsibility to determine which disciplines and projects they can administer. Practical Experience While education and licensing are an important part of an engineer's and architect's qualifications, over time the professional's real-world work experience becomes the most significant factor in determining who is the right person for your building's projects. After engineering and architectural students graduate and begin practicing in their disciplines, they typically receive training in the services their individual firms offer, and ideally they begin to pursue the types of projects that most closely align with their interests and skill set. As they carry out the day-to-day tasks of their work and start to become knowledgeable in their field, their experience and expertise eventually matter more than whether they are PE's or RA's. It's not that the license doesn't matter—far from it. The PE and RA credentials signify that the professional has acquired the necessary knowledge and training required to competently perform his or her work. New York State also has ongoing educational requirements to make sure PE's and RA's stay up to date on the http://www.randpc.com/ask/construction­administration­project­management/engineer­vs­architect/ 3/6 4/30/2015 Engineer vs. Architect | RAND Engineering Architecture, DPC latest products, technologies, and regulations affecting their practices. And, of course, New York State and City allow only licensed engineers or registered architects to perform certain tasks, such as signing and sealing design plans filed with the Buildings Department or filing New York City Local Law 11/98 facade inspection reports. But when deciding who's the best qualified person for a particular project at your building, the professional's first-hand knowledge and on-the-job experience probably outweigh whether the initials after his or her name are PE or RA. The professional's practical experience outweighs whether he or she is a PE or an RA. This is not to say that certain projects don't call for specific skill sets that an engineer is more likely to have than an architect, or vice-versa. For example, upgrading a heating plant or re-piping a domestic water system would almost certainly be better handled by a mechanical engineer than by an architect—or for that matter, than by a structural engineer. Designing the aesthetics elements of a lobby renovation or an apartment combination, on the other hand, is much more of an assignment for an interior design-oriented architect than for an engineer—or an architect who specializes in exterior work. Other types of projects, however, such as roofing replacement, window replacement, facade restoration, leakage investigation, or exterior repair in general could be handled by either an engineer or an architect with the right background. Engineers and architects, after all, don't acquire degrees in roofing, or in concrete repairs, or in finding the source of leaks. But while all engineers and architects have a general knowledge of roofing systems, building construction, and construction materials, not all of them have worked extensively on those types of projects. In deciding which company to engage on your roofing replacement project, your board should consider not only each firm's experience on similar jobs, but also the project manager who would be assigned to the project and his or her familiarity with the particular roofing system at your building. Also keep in mind that a firm with a staff of professionals with expertise in multiple disciplines will have the ability to handle different aspects of the project if required—for example, after ripping up the existing roof and finding the underlying roof deck has structural damage. Expert Witness Testimony Should your Board take legal action against the manufacturer of your previous roof or the contractor who installed it, you will want to hire the most qualified person for the job—both in practice and on paper—in case he or she has to testify on behalf of the Cooperative. Specifically, the person should be a licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Architect in New York State and have extensive experience with roofing systems, especially the kind installed at your building. If the roof suffered structural damage, it's best that the person also be a practicing structural engineer in addition to a roofing expert. http://www.randpc.com/ask/construction­administration­project­management/engineer­vs­architect/ 4/6 4/30/2015 Engineer vs. Architect | RAND Engineering Architecture, DPC A Registered Architect could very well be qualified to make a structural assessment of a roof, but given the misconception (as expressed even by some on your board) that architects are not suited for structural work, it's best to play it safe and have an engineer testify to maximize the Cooperative's chances for a favorable legal outcome. Whether you engage an engineer or an architect for this or other projects, the main thing to keep in mind is that the person's (and his or her firm's) skills and expertise should match what's needed for the job. So interview the candidates, ask for references, and select the professional—PE or RA—with your building's best interests in mind. Stephen Varone, AIA is president and Peter Varsalona, PE is principal of RAND Engineering & Architecture, DPC. This column was originally
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alternative Contracting Methods
    ALTERNATIVE CONTRACTING METHODS • Conventional Design-Bid-Build • Design/Build • Negotiated General Contractor By Jeff Warner, AIA, LEED AP Principal, ALSC Architects CONVENTIONAL DESIGN-BID-BUILD The most traditional method of delivery of a construction PROS project is where the Architect, after selection by the Client, 1. Costs may be lower due to competition. totally completes the design documents which are then 2. Project design is typically complete prior to start of distributed to General Contractors for bidding. Usually, the construction. low bidder is selected to construct the project and enters 3. Owner receives a single lump sum proposal for the entire into a lump sum type contract agreement directly with the project not subject to cost escalation. Owner. During construction, the Architect typically maintains 4. This approach conforms most directly to public bidding a strong administrative role and is the focal point of most laws. communication on the project between the Contractor and Owner. While proponents of this method of contracting feel that CONS the lowest overall initial costs are obtained through pure 1. If bids exceed budget, the project may require re-design. competitive bidding, an adversarial relationship between 2. Difficult to fast-track or pre-order materials, resulting in principal parties can develop; making the administration of later Owner occupancy. changes more difficult, time consuming and costly. Perhaps 3. The General Contractor may be in an adversarial the biggest potential problem with this approach to a major, relationship with the Owner and Architect/Engineer. complex construction project is that the Owner does not 4. Prices for change order work are typically higher and obtain a firm handle on construction costs until the project has more difficult to control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Definition of Structural Engineering by Jon A
    InFocus thoughts from a member of the Editorial Board The Definition of Structural Engineering By Jon A. Schmidt, P.E., SECB n the September 2008 issue of STRUCTURE® magazine Art of moulding materials we do not wholly ® (“Philosophy and Engineering”), I quoted a definition of understand into shapes we cannot precisely Istructural engineering that I have seen attributed to various analyse, so as to withstand forces we cannot individuals and speculated that no one knows for sure who actually really assess, in such a way that the community at large has no reason originated it. As it turns out, this was the third time that a different to suspect the extent of our ignorance.” version of the same quote has appeared in STRUCTURE – John Some websites attribute the quote to James E. Amrhein, former Mercer mentioned it in the August 2006 issue (“The ‘Art’ of Structural executive director of the Masonry Institute of America and author of Engineering”), crediting Doug Loos; and Horst Berger invoked it in the Reinforced Masonry Engineering Handbook. When I contacted him the November 2007 issue (”Structural Form in Architecture”), citing about it, he confirmed that he frequently uses it in his lectures and “a leading structural engineer” several decades ago. Prompted by a almost always gets a good response to it. However, he said that he reader comment, I decided to research the matter furtherCopyright and report found the quote many years ago and would like to acknowledge its my findings. author, but unfortunately, he does not know who that was. I first came across the quote in an article by Sharon Beder entitled Ultimately, the earliest example of the quote that I could find was “The Fallible Engineer,” which appeared in the November 2, 1991 in a 1967 British textbook, Structural Analysis Volume One, by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) to the Real Estate Development Process Using Modular Construction Methods
    Application of the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) to the Real Estate Development Process using Modular Construction Methods By Steven V. Bonelli AND Adrian M. Gonzale z Gue rra B.S., Business Administration, 2000 B.S., Industrial Engineering, 2006 University of Vermont Northwe stern University Maste r of Business Administration, 2011 University of Michigan Submitted to the Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September, 2012 ©2012 Steven V. Bonelli, Adrian M. Gonzalez Guerra All rights reserved The authors hereby grant to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author_________________________________________________________ (Steven V. Bonelli) Center for Real Estate July 30, 2012 Signature of Author_________________________________________________________ (Adrian M. Gonzale z Gue rra) Ce nter for Real Estate July 30, 2012 Certified by_______________________________________________________________ Steven D. Eppinger Professor of Management Science and Innovation Sloan School of Management Thesis Supervisor Accepted by______________________________________________________________ David Ge ltne r Chair, MSRED Committee Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development This page intentionally left
    [Show full text]
  • Design/Build and the Structural Engineer
    A look at advantages and disadvantages Design/Build and the Structural Engineer By Joseph P. Watson III, P.E. Design/build definitely presents many advantages to participants in a project. First of all, design/build offers the owner a single source of responsibility—one contact point for all questions, conflicts, and revisions. Conflicts, questions, and problems can be addressed more easily because all of the players are on the same team. As an engineer, one of the things I like best about design/build is the problem-solving aspect. When a problem arises at job site, there is no finger-pointing to determine who’s at fault, which, under other project delivery systems, can take months of accusations and digging back through design files— even legal action in some cases—to determine. With design/build, the question is not “Whose fault is it?” but rather “O.K., we’ve got a prob- lem; what do we do to solve it”. Revisions can be handled much more smoothly under design/build, again because all affected parties – architect, engineers, and contractor – The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office selected The Haskell Company especially for its design-build experience for the Falkenburg Road Jail in Tampa. The project is a five-building campus, consisting of a 44,000 s.f. reception are on the same team. Preliminary and operations center, two 50,000 s.f. dormitories with 256 beds each, a two-story 71,000 s.f. special management analysis can be worked up easily, housing facility with 256 beds, and an 8,000 s.f.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Structural & Aesthetic Developments in Tall Buildings
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: An Overview of Structural & Aesthetic Developments in Tall Buildings Using Exterior Bracing & Diagrid Systems Authors: Kheir Al-Kodmany, Professor, Urban Planning and Policy Department, University of Illinois Mir Ali, Professor Emeritus, School of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Subjects: Architectural/Design Structural Engineering Keywords: Structural Engineering Structure Publication Date: 2016 Original Publication: International Journal of High-Rise Buildings Volume 5 Number 4 Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Kheir Al-Kodmany; Mir Ali International Journal of High-Rise Buildings International Journal of December 2016, Vol 5, No 4, 271-291 High-Rise Buildings http://dx.doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2016.5.4.271 www.ctbuh-korea.org/ijhrb/index.php An Overview of Structural and Aesthetic Developments in Tall Buildings Using Exterior Bracing and Diagrid Systems Kheir Al-Kodmany1,† and Mir M. Ali2 1Urban Planning and Policy Department, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60607, USA 2School of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA Abstract There is much architectural and engineering literature which discusses the virtues of exterior bracing and diagrid systems in regards to sustainability - two systems which generally reduce building materials, enhance structural performance, and decrease overall construction cost. By surveying past, present as well as possible future towers, this paper examines another attribute of these structural systems - the blend of structural functionality and aesthetics. Given the external nature of these structural systems, diagrids and exterior bracings can visually communicate the inherent structural logic of a building while also serving as a medium for artistic effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Inspector Ii
    July 1, 1999 CLASS SPECIFICATION SAN DIEGO CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION STRUCTURAL INSPECTOR II DEFINITION: Under general supervision, to perform skilled and difficult structural inspection work on new structures, repair or renovation work; and to perform related work. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS: This is the fully experienced or journey-level class in the Structural Inspector series. Employees in this class are expected to perform the full range of duties with only occasional instruction or assistance as new or unusual situations occur. Positions classified at this level may be underfilled with Structural Inspectors I in accordance with the City’s Career Advancement Program. * EXAMPLES OF DUTIES: ! Inspects multi-family residential, commercial and industrial structures for compliance to local, State, and Federal structural codes and regulations; ! Checks and enforces field conformance to approved plans and specifications; ! Investigates complaints of code violations; ! Prepares reports; ! Maintains records; ! Prepares correction notices to property owners, tenants and contractors; ! Meets with property owners, tenants and contractors to discuss or explain specific corrections; ! Reviews construction, repair, replacement, installation, and repair plans; ! Inspects sites for practicability of plans. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Please note: the minimum qualifications stated below are a guide for determining the education, training, experience, special skills, and/or license which may be required for employment in the class. These are re-evaluated each time the position is opened for recruitment. Please refer to the most recent Job Announcement for updated minimum qualifications. Four years of experience as Inspector or a licensee of a regulating agency performing structural inspections of multi- family residential and commercial structures to require compliance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC), two years of which must be at a level equivalent to the City of San Diego=s classification of Structural Inspector I.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Guide: Real Estate Development Designing and Developing Real Estate and Community
    DESIGN GUIDE: REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT DESIGNING AND DEVELOPING REAL ESTATE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN DEVELOPMENT HOW DESIGN SUPPORTS DESIGNING ACCESSIBLE, DEVELOPMENT WELCOMING, & SUSTAINABLE PLACES 2 DESIGN GUIDE: REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT DESIGNING AND DEVELOPING REAL ESTATE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN DEVELOPMENT HOW DESIGN SUPPORTS DESIGNING ACCESSIBLE, DEVELOPMENT WELCOMING, & SUSTAINABLE PLACES 4 SECTION 1 WHAT IS DESIGN? 12 Design Disciplines 15 What a Designer Does 16 Design Principles 18 Design Solutions 19 Design Should Inspire 20 Beyond Aesthetics 10-33 24 Hiring the Right Designer SECTION 2 REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT 37 Who Is a Developer? 37 Types of Projects 42 Policy Shapes Development 44 Development Shapes a City’s Identity 34-55 49 Prioritizing Development Outcomes SECTION 3 HOW DESIGN SUPPORTS DEVELOPMENT 59 The People Involved 60 Setting Yourself Up for Success 62 Phases of the Development Journey 56-93 63 How Designers Support the Development Process Design Core Detroit 5 SECTION 4 DESIGNING ACCESSIBLE, WELCOMING, & SUSTAINABLE PLACES 97 Universal Design 103 Inclusive Design 94-111 110 Sustainable Design SECTION 5 Estate Guide: Real Design CASE STUDIES 115 Grace in Action 118 Allied Media Projects “LOVE” Building 121 Core City Developments 124 Commonwealth Single-Family House Infill 126 B. Siegel Building 112-129 128 Foundation Hotel 130 Conclusion 134 Glossary 142 Appendices 155 Resources 160 Acknowledgments 162 References 130-162 6 Strengthening the Built Environment Through Design This Guide was produced by Design Core Detroit as one of a series of Guides to help people understand design and how it can help them be more successful in their endeavors. It seeks to inspire, inform, and advise.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Engineer Vs Architect- Differents in Job, Salary
    Civil engineer vs Architect- Differents in Job, Salary If you are a civil engineer or an architectural engineer then I think I need not describe about Civil engineer vs Architect to you. Right?. You should already have some knowledge about them. Don’t you? Not to worry even you don’t know, I am here to explain it to you. But, if you are choosing to be graduate among civil engineering and architectural engineering, then you are at the right place to know “Civil engineer vs Architect” In any construction work or creation of structure like a bridge, building, airport, etc there require good knowledge and understanding of civil and architecture engineers. The skill of both professions is most required for the aesthetic and stable structure to be made. If the structure is attractive in look but not safe for landing or using, then there is no point in constructing a structure or if the structure is safe but not well manage for efficient work then also there is no point in constructing the structure. So, in short, you can understand the work of an architectural engineer is to manage and give an aesthetic look to the structure and the work of a civil engineer is to analyze and make a safe structure. However, there are some considerable differences between Civil engineer vs Architect. Let us discuss this. Civil engineer vs Architect S.N Architecture Engineer Civil Engineer Architecture engineers initialize the construction through their design. The After that the remaining designing of structure for 1 work for civil engineers aesthetic purpose means to give to proceed.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Engineering Education in the Twentyfirst Century
    Seventh LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI’2009) “Energy and Technology for the Americas: Education, Innovation, Technology and Practice” June 2-5, 2009, San Cristóbal, Venezuela. Structural Engineering Education in the Twentyfirst Century D. S. Prakash Rao The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago The unceasing quest of the society to enhance the quality and standards of living invariably culminates at the plans for the development of infrastructure. The prosperity of any country can be judged by its structures, be it buildings, bridges or towers. A vibrant economy and poor infrastructure rarely co-exist. A nation invests in the infrastructure not only for day-to-day needs but also for commerce, trade, defence, recreation and future development. Structural engineering is in the forefront of development wherever civilisation flourished. The challenges of structural engineers have increased enormously through centuries particularly in the current century with the dreams of multi-kilometre high towers and long bridges besides of establishing colonies on far off planets. Some of the aspects of structural engineering, its education and future trends are discussed in this brief article. Keywords: computer applications, development, education, infrastructure, structural engineering 1. INTRODUCTION The developments in infrastructure parallel the fiscal growth of a country, and reflect the standards of living as well as the vision and courage of engineers. Recent strides in globalisation and liberalisation led to extensive development of infrastructure all over the world. In general, infrastructure includes a wide range of systems such as roads, buildings, bridges, flyovers, communications, transportation, airports, harbours, storage, water supply, services and industry.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Building Delivery Process
    An Overview of the Building Delivery CHAPTER Process 1 (How Buildings Come into Being) CHAPTER OUTLINE 1.1 PROJECT DELIVERY PHASES 1.11 CONSTRUCTION PHASE: CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 1.2 PREDESIGN PHASE 1.12 POSTCONSTRUCTION PHASE: 1.3 DESIGN PHASE PROJECT CLOSEOUT 1.4 THREE SEQUENTIAL STAGES IN DESIGN PHASE 1.13 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: DESIGN- BID-BUILD METHOD 1.5 CSI MASTERFORMAT AND SPECIFICATIONS 1.14 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: 1.6 THE CONSTRUCTION TEAM DESIGN-­NEGOTIATE-BUILD METHOD 1.7 PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE: THE BIDDING 1.15 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS MANAGEMENT-RELATED METHODS 1.8 PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE: THE SURETY BONDS 1.16 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: DESIGN-BUILD METHOD 1.9 PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE: SELECTING THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND PROJECT 1.17 INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD DELIVERY 1.18 FAST-TRACK PROJECT SCHEDULING 1.10 CONSTRUCTION PHASE: SUBMITTALS AND CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DOCUMENTATION Building construction is a complex, significant, and rewarding process. It begins with an idea and culminates in a structure that may serve its occupants for several decades, even centuries. Like the manufacturing of products, building construction requires an ordered and planned assembly of materials. It is, however, far more complicated than product manufacturing. Buildings are assembled outdoors by a large number of diverse constructors and artisans on all types of sites and are subject to all kinds of weather conditions. Additionally, even a modest-sized building must satisfy many performance criteria and legal constraints, requires an immense variety of materials, and involves a large network of design and production firms. Building construction is further complicated by the fact that no two buildings are identical; each one must be custom built to serve a unique function and respond to its specific context and the preferences of its owner, user, and occupant.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Design Authority
    BUILDING DESIGN AUTHORITY Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors 2535 Capitol Oaks Drive, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95833 1-866-780-5370 www.bpelsg.ca.gov [email protected] STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS may design any building of any type. CIVIL ENGINEERS may design any building of any type EXCEPT public schools and hospitals. ARCHITECTS may design any building of any type EXCEPT the structural portion of a hospital. UNLICENSED INDIVIDUALS may design only the following types of buildings: Single-family dwellings of not more than two stories and basement in height. Multiple dwellings containing not more than four dwelling units of woodframe construction of not more than two stories and basement in height and no more than four dwelling units per lot. Garages or other structures appurtenant to the dwellings described above of woodframe construction not more than two stories and basement in height. NOTE: If any portion of the structures described above does not meet the conventional woodframe requirements described in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations or in the building codes of the local jurisdiction, then the building official having jurisdiction shall require the plans, calculations, and specifications for that portion of the structure to be prepared and signed and sealed by a licensed engineer or a licensed architect. Agricultural and ranch buildings of wood frame construction, unless the building official having jurisdiction determines that an undue risk to the public health, safety, or welfare is involved. Store fronts, interior alterations or additions, fixtures, cabinetwork, furniture, or other appliances or equipment, including any work necessary to install these items, or any alterations or additions to any building necessary to install these items, as long as the alterations do not affect the structural safety of the building.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bridge & Structural Engineer
    The Bridge & Structural Engineer Indian National Group of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering ING - IABSE Contents : Volume 46, Number 4 : December 2016 Editorial ● From the Desk of Chairman, Editorial Board : Mr. Alok Bhowmick iv ● From the Desk of Guest Editor : Mr. P Surya Prakash vi Special Topic : Challenges Facing the Civil & Structural Engineering Industry 1. Challenges Facing the Civil & Structural Engineering Fraternity in India 1 Elattuvalapil Sreedharan, Mahesh Tandon 2. Role of Civil and Structural Engineers in Sustainable Built Environment 4 Subramanian Narayanan 3. Civil/Structural Engineering Education & Professional Practice in India : An Introspection 19 Manoj Mittal 4. Challenges for the Consulting Engineering Fraternity 23 Sayona Philip 5. Civil Engineers – Establishing Their Role 27 R. Gogia 6. Let’s Continue to Practice without Legislation for Engineers 32 Sudhir Dhawan 7. Engineering Design Services in India - Challenges Ahead 35 Amitabha Ghoshal 8. Challenges Facing Structural Engineers & Engineering Organizations 39 Alpa Sheth, Rajendra Gill 9. Ethics and Structural Design of Buildings 44 Sangeeta Wij 10. India’s Vision 2030 What Engineers & Technologists Can Do? 49 Ajit Sabnis CONTENTS 11. Developing the Next Generation of Civil Engineers – A Challenging Task Ahead 53 Alok Bhowmick Panorma ● Highlights of the ING-IABSE Seminar on “Urban Transport Corridors” held at 58 Visakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh) on 21st and 22nd October, 2016 ● Message from Vice President of India 61 ● Message
    [Show full text]