DOCSLIB.ORG

Forest Resources of the Coconino NF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forest Resources of the Coconino NF United States Department of Agriculture Forest Resources Forest Service Rocky Mountain of the Coconino Research Station May 2003 National Forest Larry T. DeBlander Mark Fleck About the author __________________________ Larry T. DeBlander is a Forester with the Interior West Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, Rocky Mountain Research Station in Ogden, Utah. Mark Fleck is an Ecologist with the Interior West Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, Rocky Mountain Research Station in Ogden, Utah. Contents __________________________________ Page Description of the Forest ........................................................................................ 1 Total forest land: highlights of our inventory ..................................................... 2 Nonreserved timberland: highlights of our inventory ...................................... 9 The inventory methods ......................................................................................... 11 Documentation ....................................................................................................... 13 For further information ......................................................................................... 13 Rocky Mountain Research Station 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 Forest Resources of the Coconino National Forest Larry T. DeBlander Mark Fleck The Interior West Forest Inventory and Analysis (IWFIA) previous estimates and summaries for this area. Additional program of the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Re- data collected for the Coconino National Forest, used search Station, as part of its national Forest Inventory and separately or in combination with IWFIA data, may pro- Analysis (FIA) duties, conducted forest resource invento- duce varying results. ries of the Southwestern Region (Region 3) National For- ests. This report presents highlights of the Coconino Na- tional Forest 1995 inventory including population Description of the Forest estimates and summaries of commonly requested vari- The Coconino National Forest administers 1,849,510 ables. Any trends or disturbances (such as, fire) that have acres (USDA 1996) of which 85 percent is classified as for- occurred after 1995 will be discussed in future reports of est land and 15 percent nonforest or water. This report de- the Coconino National Forest. scribes the characteristics of the forest land sampled on The information presented in this report is based solely the Coconino. Forest land is land that is at least 10 percent on the IWFIA inventory sample (USDA 1995). The data stocked (or formerly stocked) with live tally tree species could be summarized in other ways for different purposes and is greater than 1 acre in size and 120 feet wide. Based (see “For further information” on the inside back cover for on the tree species present, forest land can be further sub- the national FIA database and related contacts). Supple- divided into two land categories: timberland and wood- mental documentation and inventory terminology can be land (fig. 1). Timberland is forest land with mostly timber found in USDA (2002a), O’Brien (2002), or on the World species typically used in the wood products industry, such Wide Web at http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/ogden. Changes in as ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir. Woodland is forest terminology or procedures may limit comparisons with land with mostly woodland species that often have a multistem growth form and are not typically used for in- dustrial wood products, such as pinyon pine, junipers, and oaks. On the Coconino, 53 percent of the total forest land is timberland while 47 percent is woodland. Nine percent of the total forest land area administered by the Coconino is reserved land, meaning that it has been 15% 45% Timberland Woodland Nonforest/water 40% Figure 1—Percent of total area by land category, Coconino National Forest. 1 withdrawn from management for production of wood products, such as wilderness areas. The first section of this report presents summaries of timber and woodland species for all forest land, including reserved designations. The sub- sequent section addresses nonreserved lands only and includes estimates for timber species sampled on the Coconino. Total forest land: highlights of our inventory Forest type—Forest resources are often de- scribed using a forest type classification. Forest type refers to the predominant tree species in a stand, based on plurality of tree stocking. Stocking is an expression of the extent to which growing space is effectively utilized by live trees. Figure 2 presents the distribution of forest land area on the Coconino by forest type. The ponderosa pine forest type is the most common forest type, compris- by forest type for 255 plots that contained at least one for- ing nearly 48 percent of the total forest land area. Pinyon- est condition. juniper and pure juniper types comprise a combined 44 percent of the total forest land area. The remaining 8 per- Number of live trees—Forest land can also be examined cent comprises a variety of timber and woodland types in- by looking at the composition of tree species. Figure 3 cluding Douglas-fir, aspen, white fir, miscellaneous west- shows total number of live trees for all sampled tree spe- ern softwoods, and cottonwood (timber forest types), plus cies on the Coconino for three diameter classes. Ponde- deciduous woodland oak, maple woodland, mesquite, and rosa pine makes up the plurality of live trees at 45 percent. miscellaneous western hardwoods (woodland forest Gambel oak makes up 14 percent and New Mexico locust types). 6 percent, with most of these less than 5 inches in diam- A field plot may sample more than one condition eter. Douglas-fir, common or twoneedle pinyon, and Utah (stand). A forest condition is generally defined as an area juniper together make up 17 percent of the live trees on the of relatively homogeneous vegetative cover that meets the Coconino; white fir and oneseed juniper, 4 percent each; criteria for forest land. Forest type is one of several attributes alligator juniper, 3 percent; and aspen and southwestern that define and separate conditions identified on the plot. white pine, 3 percent. Bigtooth maple, Arizona pinyon Table 1 presents the number of conditions and the condi- pine, singleleaf pinyon, and Rocky Mountain juniper to- tion proportions sampled on the Coconino National Forest gether make up 3 percent. The rest of the live trees, which Ponderosa pine Pinyon-juniper Juniper Douglas-fir Deciduous woodland oak Aspen Misc. western softwoods Forest type Maple woodland Mesquite White fir Misc. western hardwoods Cottonwood 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent forest land Figure 2—Percent of total forest land area by forest type, Coconino National Forest. 2 Table 1—Number of conditions and condition proportions are grouped in the other timber and other woodland spe- on forest land by forest type and land category, cies categories, are found in limited amounts on the Coconino National Forest, 1995. Coconino. Other timber species includes Arizona cypress, Engelmann spruce, corkbark fir, and narrowleaf cotton- Number of Condition a b wood; other woodland species includes western honey Forest type conditions proportions mesquite, Arizona white oak/gray oak, Emory oak, redberry Timberland juniper, and velvet mesquite. Species that are scarce may Ponderosa pine 147 120.9 not be encountered with the extensive sampling strategy Douglas-fir 6 3.7 used for this inventory. Aspen 3 2.7 Number and weight of dead trees—Standing and down White fir 1 0.9 dead trees are important to forest ecosystems because Cottonwood 1 0.5 they provide habitat for many species of wildlife, function Misc. western softwoods 4 3.0 as nutrient sinks, and protect the soil from erosion. Ap- Total timberland 162 131.7 proximately 28.1 million standing dead trees (snags) and Woodland 23.9 million down dead trees (1 inch diameter and greater) Pinyon-juniper 79 69.4 are on Coconino forest land, with 17.8 snags per acre. Dif- Juniper 43 41.1 ferent size snags provide habitat components for many Deciduous woodland oak 4 3.2 wildlife species. Figure 4 shows the number of snags by Mesquite 2 1.3 forest type for three diameter classes. Of the total num- Maple woodland 1 0.7 bers of snags , 59 percent are between 1 inch and 4.9 Misc. western hardwoods 1 0.5 inches diameter, with nearly two-thirds of these occurring Total woodland 130 116.2 within the ponderosa pine forest type. Of the total num- bers of snags, 27 percent are between 5 and 10.9 inches di- Grand total 292 *247.8 ameter, with approximately half of these occurring within aNumber of conditions by forest type that were sampled. The sum the ponderosa pine forest type. Snags 11 inches diameter of these numbers is often greater than the total number of plots or larger make up 14 percent of the total, with 2.5 snags because a plot may sample more than one forest condition. per acre. Most of these large snags are found on ponde- bSum of the condition proportions of plots by forest type that were sampled. The sum of these numbers is often less than the total rosa pine (37 percent) and pinyon-juniper (33 percent) for- number of plots because of nonforest condition proportions (from est types. No snags were sampled in the mesquite, miscel- plots containing both forest and nonforest conditions) that are not laneous western hardwoods, or cottonwood forest types. included here. The amount of dead material can contribute significantly *Number does not add to total due to rounding to forest fuel loads and fire potential. Approximately 1.8 million tons of down dead trees and 2.2 million tons of 100 90 80 70 60 1" - 4.9" 50 5" - 10.9" >=11" 40 Million trees 30 20 10 0 Aspen oneedle pinyon White fir pinyon pecies locust Mountain pine Singleleaf s her timber ambel oak pecies uniper ona pinyon Douglas-fir Tw j s white pine Utah juniper G New Mexico outhwestern gator juniper Ot cky li her woodland S onderosa pine neseed juniper Ariz Bigtooth maple Al P Ot Ro O Timber Woodland Species Figure 3—Number of live trees 1 inch diameter and greater on forest land by species and diameter-size class, Coconino National Forest.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IMBCR Report
    Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions (IMBCR): 2015 Field Season Report June 2016 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 14500 Lark Bunting Lane Brighton, CO 80603 303-659-4348 www.birdconservancy.org Tech. Report # SC-IMBCR-06 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies Connecting people, birds and land Mission: Conserving birds and their habitats through science, education and land stewardship Vision: Native bird populations are sustained in healthy ecosystems Bird Conservancy of the Rockies conserves birds and their habitats through an integrated approach of science, education and land stewardship. Our work radiates from the Rockies to the Great Plains, Mexico and beyond. Our mission is advanced through sound science, achieved through empowering people, realized through stewardship and sustained through partnerships. Together, we are improving native bird populations, the land and the lives of people. Core Values: 1. Science provides the foundation for effective bird conservation. 2. Education is critical to the success of bird conservation. 3. Stewardship of birds and their habitats is a shared responsibility. Goals: 1. Guide conservation action where it is needed most by conducting scientifically rigorous monitoring and research on birds and their habitats within the context of their full annual cycle. 2. Inspire conservation action in people by developing relationships through community outreach and science-based, experiential education programs. 3. Contribute to bird population viability and help sustain working lands by partnering with landowners and managers to enhance wildlife habitat. 4. Promote conservation and inform land management decisions by disseminating scientific knowledge and developing tools and recommendations. Suggested Citation: White, C. M., M. F. McLaren, N. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLEGUIDELINES OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 12: CONTACT INFORMATION AND MAPS 12.1 ADOT CONTACT INFORMATION……………………………………………….......122 12.2 BLM CONTACT INFORMATION…………………………………………………......123 12.3 USFS CONTACT INFORMATION………………………………………………….....124 12.4 FHWA CONTACT INFORMATION…………………………………………………....130 12.5 GIS INFORMATION..............................................................................................131 12.6 MAPS...................................................................................................................132 121 12.1 ADOT CONTACT INFORMATION ADOT web link azdot.gov/ ADOT maps azdot.gov/maps General Information 602-712-7355 OFFICE ADOT DIRECTOR 602.712.7227 Deputy Director of Transportation 602.712.7391 Deputy Director of Policy 602.712.7550 Deputy Director of Business Operations 602.712.7228 Multimodal Planning Division (MPD) Director 602.712.7431 MPD Planning and Programming Director 602.712.8140 MPD Planning and Environmental Linkages Manager 602.712.4574 Infrastructure Delivery and Operations Division (IDO) 602.712.7391 State Engineer, Sr. Deputy State Engineer and Deputy State Engineer Offices 602.712.7391 DISTRICT ENGINEERS Northcentral azdot.gov/business/district-contacts/northcentral 928.774.1491 Northeast azdot.gov/business/district-contacts/northeast 928.524.5400 Central Construction District azdot.gov/business/district-contacts/central 602.712.8965 Central Maintenance District azdot.gov/business/district-contacts/central 602.712.6664 Northwest azdot.gov/business/district-contacts/northwest 928.777.5861
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • State No. Description Size in Cm Date Location
    Maps State No. Description Size in cm Date Location National Forests in Alabama. Washington: ALABAMA AL-1 49x28 1989 Map Case US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service. Bankhead National Forest (Bankhead and Alabama AL-2 66x59 1981 Map Case Blackwater Districts). Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Side A : Coronado National Forest (Nogales A: 67x72 ARIZONA AZ-1 1984 Map Case Ranger District). Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. B: 67x63 Side B : Coronado National Forest (Sierra Vista Ranger District). Side A : Coconino National Forest (North A:69x88 Arizona AZ-2 1976 Map Case Half). Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. B:69x92 Side B : Coconino National Forest (South Half). Side A : Coronado National Forest (Sierra A:67x72 Arizona AZ-3 1976 Map Case Vista Ranger District. Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. B:67x72 Side B : Coronado National Forest (Nogales Ranger District). Prescott National Forest. Washington: US Arizona AZ-4 28x28 1992 Map Case Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Kaibab National Forest (North Unit). Arizona AZ-5 68x97 1967 Map Case Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Prescott National Forest- Granite Mountain Arizona AZ-6 67x48.5 1993 Map Case Wilderness. Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Side A : Prescott National Forest (East Half). A:111x75 Arizona AZ-7 1993 Map Case Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. B:111x75 Side B : Prescott National Forest (West Half). Arizona AZ-8 Superstition Wilderness: Tonto National 55.5x78.5 1994 Map Case Forest. Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Arizona AZ-9 Kaibab National Forest, Gila and Salt River 80x96 1994 Map Case Meridian.
    [Show full text]
  • Usfs-Fy-2021-Budget-Justification.Pdf
    2021 USDA EXPLANATORY NOTES – FOREST SERVICE 1 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum-Fire Closure-Order Order-Number 03-04-20-02F-2019 12 23-W-Map
    Order Number: 03-04-20-02 F UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE COCONINO NATIONAL FOREST FLAGSTAFF RANGER DISTRICT TEMPORARY CLOSURE DUE TO THE MUSEUM FIRE (For Public Safety) PROHIBITIONS Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 551 and 36 C.F.R. § 261.50(a), the following acts are prohibited within the area described in this Order (the “Restricted Area”), and as depicted on the attached map, hereby incorporated into this order as Exhibit A, all within the within the boundaries of the Flagstaff Ranger District of the Coconino National Forest, Coconino County, Arizona (AZ): 1. Going into or being upon the Restricted Area. 36 C.F.R. § 261.53(e) EXEMPTIONS Pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 261.50(e), the following persons are exempt from this Order: 1. Persons with a written Forest Service authorization specifically exempting them from the effect of this Order. 2. Any Federal, State, or local officer, or member of an organized rescue or fire fighting force in the performance of an official duty. RESTRICTED AREA The Restricted Area includes all National Forest System lands, roads, and trails (unless otherwise indicated below) within the boundary starting at the intersection of the Lower Oldham Trail (# 1), Rocky Ridge Trail (#153) and Forest Road (FR) 557 (Elden Lookout Road) (located in the southwestern quarter section of Township 22 North and Range 7 East, Section 26), then following Rocky Ridge Trail west to the section line between Sections 33 and 34 in Township 22 North and Range 7 East, then following the section line north to the junction
    [Show full text]
  • Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2020 to 12/31/2020 Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Nancy Rusho 228, subpart A. Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 202-731-9196 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 11/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. More Information is available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/science-technology/geology/minerals/locatable-minerals/current-revisions. R3 - Southwestern Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) 4FRI Rim Country Project - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants In Progress: Expected:07/2021 08/2021 Mike Dechter EIS - Forest products DEIS NOA in Federal Register 928-527-3416 [email protected] *UPDATED* - Vegetation management 10/18/2019 (other than forest products) Est. FEIS NOA in Federal - Fuels management Register 03/2021 - Watershed management - Road management Description: Landscape-scale restoration on the Coconino, Apache-Sitgreaves, and Tonto National Forests of ponderosa pine ecosystems, designed to maintain, improve, and restore ecosystem structure, pattern, function, and resiliency.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency Administrator Workshop Participants FY2014 Thru FY2016
    Agency Administrator Workshop Participants FY2014 thru FY2016 Benson Teresa FS Sequoia National Forest FY14 Briscoe Caren FS National Forests in Mississippi FY14 Carlson Ann FS Lassen National Forest FY14 Christiansen Donn FS Cleveland National Forest FY14 Donald Michael FS Plumas National Forest FY14 Ewing Rebecca FS Mark Twain National Forest FY14 Gosse Michael FS Ocala National Forest FY14 Herrera Macario FS Allegheny National Forest FY14 Hutchins Michael FS Olympic National Forest FY14 Jackson William FS Green Mountain National Forest FY14 Kelley Keith FS Cherokee National Forest FY14 Maercklein Mary FS Ozark-St. Francis National Forest FY14 McCombs Matthew FS Pisgah National Forest FY14 McCoy Jim FS Ozark-St. Francis National Forest FY14 Morgan Leslie FS National Forests in Mississippi FY14 Morris JaSal FS Cherokee National Forest FY14 Moynihan Megan FS Ouachita National Forest FY14 Napper Carolyn FS Shasta-Trinity National Forest FY14 Nedlo Jason FS Daniel Boone National Forest FY14 Pentecost Mark FS Superior National Forest FY14 Petersen Brittany FWS Bon Secour NWR FY14 Russell Scott FS Coconino National Forest FY14 Schroyer Karen FS Dixie National Forest FY14 Shinn Jeffrey FS Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests FY14 Skustad Carl FS Superior National Forest FY14 Steele Kurtis FS Superior National Forest FY14 Stresser Susan FS Shoshone National Forest FY14 Walker Erick FS Idaho Panhandle National Forest FY14 Watson Alfred FS Sequoia National Forest FY14 Yoshina Dean FS Olympic National Forest FY14 Alfred Roderick FS Inyo National
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Condition Framework: 2011-2017
    United States Department of Agriculture Watershed Condition Framework: 2011–2017 Forest Service FS-1114 December 2018 Cover photo: The Cabinet Mountains are a part of the Rocky Mountains and located in northwest Montana and the panhandle of Idaho. The mountains cover more than 2 million acres. USDA Forest Service photo. Completed bridge on Farmer Creek in Siuslaw National Forest, Oregon. The Farmer Creek-Nestucca River Watershed serves as a critical spawning and rearing habitat for the stocks of Oregon Coast coho salmon that are listed as threat- ened under the Endangered Species Act. Among other restoration efforts in this watershed, 11 Federal, State, and local partners worked with the Forest Service to reconnect 7.5 miles of habitat through projects such as reconstruction of this bridge. USDA Forest Service photo. INTRODUCTION Our Nation’s forests and grasslands produce created a foundational tool in achieving USDA and abundant, clean water to sustain ecosystems and Forest Service strategic goals. Although the WCF is communities. As stewards of more than 193 national in scope, prioritization of watersheds and million acres of land and the waters arising from implementation of restoration activities are done those lands, the Forest Service, an agency of the regionally and locally. Local-level decision making U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), pro- and implementation enables individual communities tects, conserves, maintains, and restores a variety to determine how to best steward their forests and of biologically diverse ecosystems to provide for capitalize on the benefits from their restoration ef- resilience and adaptation to changes in land use, forts. The local nature of these efforts can be seen climate, and user demands.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 50000000 Forest Service 2 01000000 Northern Region R1 3
    Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: FS000 Lvl Org Code and Description 1 50000000 Forest Service 2 01000000 Northern Region R1 3 01000009 Fire, Aviation & Air 3 0100GNC Great Northern Crew R1 3 0100MTDC Missoula Tech and Development 3 01020000 Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest 4 01020001 Dillon Ranger District 4 01020002 Wise River Ranger District 4 01020003 Wisdom Ranger District 4 01020004 Butte Ranger District 4 01020006 Madison Ranger District 4 01020007 Jefferson Ranger District 4 01020008 Pintler Ranger District 3 01030000 Bitterroot National Forest 4 01030001 Stevensville Ranger District 4 01030002 Darby Ranger District 4 01030003 Sula Ranger District 4 01030004 West Fork Ranger District 4 010300AD Bitterroot NF ADs 4 0103HELI Bitterroot Helitack Crew 4 0103IHC2 Bitterroot IHC 3 01040000 Idaho Panhandle National Forests 4 01040001 Coeur d'Alene River Ranger District 5 0104IHC Idaho Panhandle IHC 4 01040004 St. Joe Ranger District 4 01040006 Sandpoint Ranger District 4 01040007 Bonners Ferry Ranger District 4 01040008 Priest Lake Ranger District 4 0104AD Idaho Panhandle AD Employee 4 0104HELI IPNF Helitack 3 01100000 Flathead National Forest 4 01100001 Swan Lake Ranger District 4 01100004 Spotted Bear Ranger District 4 01100006 Hungry Horse Ranger District 4 01100008 Tally Lake Ranger District 4 0110FIHC Flathead Hotshot Crew 4 0110HELI Flathead NF Helitack 3 01110000 Custer Gallatin National Forest 4 01110003 Gardiner Ranger District 4 01110004 Yellowstone Ranger District 4 01110006 Bozeman
    [Show full text]
  • Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County
    Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County State Congressional District County Unit NFS Acreage Alabama 1st Escambia Conecuh National Forest 29,179 1st Totals 29,179 2nd Coffee Pea River Land Utilization Project 40 Covington Conecuh National Forest 54,881 2nd Totals 54,921 3rd Calhoun Rose Purchase Unit 161 Talladega National Forest 21,412 Cherokee Talladega National Forest 2,229 Clay Talladega National Forest 66,763 Cleburne Talladega National Forest 98,750 Macon Tuskegee National Forest 11,348 Talladega Talladega National Forest 46,272 3rd Totals 246,935 4th Franklin William B. Bankhead National Forest 1,277 Lawrence William B. Bankhead National Forest 90,681 Winston William B. Bankhead National Forest 90,030 4th Totals 181,988 6th Bibb Talladega National Forest 60,867 Chilton Talladega National Forest 22,986 6th Totals 83,853 2018 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/13/2018 Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County State Congressional District County Unit NFS Acreage 7th Dallas Talladega National Forest 2,167 Hale Talladega National Forest 28,051 Perry Talladega National Forest 32,796 Tuscaloosa Talladega National Forest 10,998 7th Totals 74,012 Alabama Totals 670,888 Alaska At Large Anchorage Municipality Chugach National Forest 248,417 Haines Borough Tongass National Forest 767,952 Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Tongass National Forest 1,974,292 Juneau City and Borough Tongass National Forest 1,672,846 Kenai Peninsula Borough Chugach National Forest 1,261,067 Ketchikan Gateway Borough Tongass
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Restrictions to Begin Friday on Four Arizona National Forests
    NEWS RELEASE Coconino National Forest – www.fs.usda.gov/coconino Kaibab National Forest – www.fs.usda.gov/kaibab Prescott National Forest – www.fs.usda.gov/prescott Tonto National Forest – www.fs.usda.gov/tonto For Immediate Release Jacqueline Banks, 928-635-8314 April 15, 2014 Heather Noel, 928-527-3490 Debbie Maneely, 928-443-8130 David Albo, 602-525-1042 Fire Restrictions To Begin Friday On Four Arizona National Forests ARIZONA – Campfire and smoking restrictions will be implemented at 8 a.m. Friday, April 18, on the Coconino, Kaibab, Prescott and Tonto National Forests in order to protect public health and reduce preventable human-caused fires. On the Kaibab National Forest, restrictions will apply only to the Williams and Tusayan Ranger Districts. Fire restrictions will not yet be implemented on the North Kaibab Ranger District due to different weather and fuels conditions. Under the restrictions, fires, campfires, charcoal, coal and wood stoves are allowed in developed campgrounds only. The restrictions also limit smoking to within enclosed vehicles or buildings or in developed campgrounds. Using a device that is solely fueled by liquid petroleum or LPG fuels that can be turned on and off is allowed in areas that are clear of flammable materials. Fireworks are always prohibited on all national forest lands. On the Prescott National Forest, campfires are not allowed at the designated dispersed sites within the Prescott Basin. Metal posts identify designated dispersed sites with a number. Implementation of fire restrictions is especially important this year given the dry winter and impacts of long-term drought on the forests.
    [Show full text]