DOCSLIB.ORG

THE COAT of ARMS the Journal of the Heraldry Society

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE COAT of ARMS the Journal of the Heraldry Society THE COAT OF ARMS The journal of the Heraldry Society Fourth Series Volume II 2019 Number 236 in the original series started in 1952 The Heraldry Society is an educational charity. Its purpose is to promote greater understanding and appreciation of heraldry and its related subjects. The society organises lectures, study days, congresses, dinners and other social activities. It offers a course in heraldry leading to examination for a diploma. It publishes a range of source material at modest cost. Members receive the Coat of Arms and the quarterly Heraldry Gazette. Help to support our work and participate in our social activities by joining today via our website www.theheraldrysociety.com Registered office 53 Hitchin Street, Baldock, Hertfordshire SG7 6AQ The Society was registered in England in 1956 as registered charity no. 241456. The Coat of Arms is a non commercial, non profit making academic journal. Advertising space is sold in order to subsidise the cost of printing. The contents of this journal will be made freely available to all online via the Heraldry Society website one year following distribution of paper copy to members. Images may be subject to copyright, and should not be reproduced without permission of the originator. President His Grace The Duke of Norfolk, Earl Marshal Honorary Secretary John Tunesi of Liongam e-mai1 : honsecheraldrysociety @googlemail.com Membership Secretary Jane Tunes i of Lionga m e-mail: mem [email protected] Material appearing in The Coat of Arms does not necessarily represent the views of the Honorary Editor, of the Editorial Panel, or of the Society. Printed in Bristol by 4Word Ltd. ©The Heraldry Society ISSN 0010-003X Founding Editor † John Brooke-Little, C.V.O, M.A., F.H.S. Honorary Editor Dr Paul A Fox, M.A., F.S.A, F.H.S.,F.R.C.P., A.I.H. Editorial Panel Dr Adrian Ailes, M.A., D.PHIL., F.S.A., F.H.S., A.I.H. Dr Jackson W Armstrong, B.A., M.PHIL., PH.D. Steven Ashley, F.S.A, a.i.h. Dr Claire Boudreau, PH.D., F.R.H.S.C., A.I.H Chief Herald of Canada Prof D’Arcy J.D.Boulton, M.A., PH.D., D.PHIL., F.S.A., A.I.H. Dr Clive.E.A.Cheesman, M.A., PH.D., F.S.A. Richmond Herald Steen Clemmensen A.I.H. M.Peter D.O’Donoghue, M.A., F.S.A. York Herald Dr Andrew Gray, PH.D., F.H.S. Prof Dr Torsten Hiltmann, PH.D., a.i.h. Prof Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard, PH.D., F.S.A., F,R,Hist.S., A.I.H. Elizabeth Roads, L.V.O., LL.B., F.S.A., A.I.H. Snawdoun Herald Advertising Manager John J. Tunesi of Liongam,M.Sc., FSA Scot., Hon.F.H.S., Q.G. Guidance for authors will be found online at www.theheraldrysociety.com THE LAST SITTING OF THE COURT OF CHIVALRY: AN UNDISCLOSED CONFLICT OF INTEREST AMONGST OTHER CONFUSIONS STEPHEN HUMPHREYS LL.M, PH.D Abstract The last sitting of the Court of Chivalry in 1954 is perhaps best known for the fact that it confirmed its own legal survival. But its quarter-millennium desuetude had arguably caused it to lose something of its skill-set, for in its written judgment several areas of uncertainty were introduced in to the law. The judgment appeared to bring mottoes into the scope of the law of arms; indicated that future right of access to the Court should be restricted; created a distinction between the ‘use’ and ‘mere display’ of arms; suggested that the rightful owner of arms may not be entitled to grant permission for another to ‘bear’ those arms; and set the precedent that a dignity was a coat of arms. These sequelae to the judgment are bewildering and almost certainly arose because of the admitted ignorance of the surrogate judge, aided and abetted by his undisclosed conflict of interest. Introduction When the only court to have jurisdiction over a matter had not sat for over two centuries its determination, together with the deliberations which the court engaged in, were inevitably to be referenced whenever matters touching its competence are discussed. Furthermore, it is argued here, the judgment in the case of The Lord Mayor, Aldermen and Citizens of Manchester v the Manchester Palace of Varieties Limited 1 supplied little in the way of clarification, and instead created fresh uncertainties. That these areas of newly introduced confusion have gone without apparent notice by the community of heraldists is surprising, but perhaps is due to attention being given to what the court did clarify. The substantial matters which the court confirmed were that it still had exclusive jurisdiction in matters armorial; that corporate bodies in possession of a grant of arms could bring an action just as natural persons could; and that the defendants in the instant case had acted contrary to the law of arms. Simultaneous with giving such judgments however the court initiated its own dismantlement and referenced other matters which 1 The Full Report of the Case of the Mayor, Aldermen and Citizens of the City of Manchester versus the Manchester Palace of Varieties Limited in the High Court of Chivalry on Tuesday, 21st December 1954. Heraldry Society (East Knoyle, 1955); hereinafter Her Soc 1955. For those with legal training the relevant law reports are as follows: P 133, [1955] 1 All ER 387, [1955] 2 WLR 440, [1954–55] 1 ALR 238. 98 The Coat of Arms 4th ser. 2 (2019), no. 236 pp. 98–108. THE COURT OF CHIVALRY Figure 1: Lord Chief Justice William Edgar Rayner Goddard, Baron Goddard (1877–1971). His portrait at Trinity College, Oxford. – and notwithstanding that they were made obiter dicta – have proven more influential than they might have been assumed at the time; even though various aspects do not withstand scrutiny. Much of the blame for all this, it is here contended, can be ascribed to the surrogate Lord Chief Justice Rayner Goddard 2 (Figure 1) who acknowledged that 2 I. De Minvielle-Devaux The Laws of Arms in England, France & Scotland (2007) p.6 notes: “it has long been customary for … [the hereditary judge, the Earl Marshall] to appoint a lawyer as his surrogate or lieutenant to perform his judicial duties”. 99 THE COAT OF ARMS he knew nothing about the law he was adjudicating on and who appears to have had a conflict of interest. The motto Let us begin with the court’s decision which found the defendants to “have displayed representations of the said arms crest motto and supporters in the manner in this case libellate … contrary to the will of the Plaintiffs and the laws and usages of arms AND WE INHIBIT AND STRICTLY ENJOIN the Defendants that they do not presume to display the said arms crest motto or supporters or any of them” (emphasis added).3 This ruling was made despite the fact that the laws and usage of arms in England had never before – over centuries of practice – taken any regard of mottoes. The judgment however is now authority for mottoes being caught under the English law of arms. Unlike other components of armorial bearings, mottoes, it is usually acknowledged, are not granted by any legal process in England. Nothing has prevented anyone at all from having – or not having – a motto and, consequently, individuals have been fully at liberty to change or discard their chosen motto as they have seen fit and without legal impediment. Nor has there been a requirement that a person’s motto be unique to them. A motto, after all, is no more, in essence, than one or more words, and as words belong to the language, usage cannot be subject to legal delimitation – a point which was made by Woodcock and Robinson,4 apparently oblivious to the fact that the High Court had indicated otherwise. The court’s decision in Manchester, “that they do not presume to display the said… motto … or any of them” casts this time-honoured understanding of English heraldic practice into doubt as it seems to suggest the law could now intervene to prevent the display of another’s motto.5 The decision on this matter made by Lord Chief Justice Goddard – who, after giving his judgment, is seen in the transcript of the case to have acknowledged to counsel for the plaintiffs: “You probably know something about the law of arms; I frankly admit that I know nothing”6 – contradicts centuries of heraldic practice, and as such has the hallmarks of being made in error. This was not the only area of confusion in which the law of arms was placed following the judgment, yet, ironically, Lord Goddard’s proposed restrictions in accessing the Court in future would serve to limit further opportunity for clarifying the relevant law: “if this Court is to sit again it should be convened only where there is some really substantial reason for the exercise of its jurisdiction.”7 3 Her Soc 1955 p.69. 4 T. Woodcock and J.M. Robinson The Oxford Guide to Heraldry (Oxford, 1988). 5 In Scotland, a motto when depicted with a coat of arms can be subject to a legal grant, but there the grant only serves to associate the motto with a particular coat of arms. It does not absolutely seek to prevent anyone else from also using the same words, provided they do not attempt to associate the words – the motto – with another coat of arms; and always subject to matriculation. 6 Her Soc 1955. p.61.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Catalogue of the Earl Marshal's Papers at Arundel
    CONTENTS CONTENTS v FOREWORD by Sir Anthony Wagner, K.C.V.O., Garter King of Arms vii PREFACE ix LIST OF REFERENCES xi NUMERICAL KEY xiii COURT OF CHIVALRY Dated Cases 1 Undated Cases 26 Extracts from, or copies of, records relating to the Court; miscellaneous records concerning the Court or its officers 40 EARL MARSHAL Office and Jurisdiction 41 Precedence 48 Deputies 50 Dispute between Thomas, 8th Duke of Norfolk and Henry, Earl of Berkshire, 1719-1725/6 52 Secretaries and Clerks 54 COLLEGE OF ARMS General Administration 55 Commissions, appointments, promotions, suspensions, and deaths of Officers of Arms; applications for appointments as Officers of Arms; lists of Officers; miscellanea relating to Officers of Arms 62 Office of Garter King of Arms 69 Officers of Arms Extraordinary 74 Behaviour of Officers of Arms 75 Insignia and dress 81 Fees 83 Irregularities contrary to the rules of honour and arms 88 ACCESSIONS AND CORONATIONS Coronation of King James II 90 Coronation of King George III 90 Coronation of King George IV 90 Coronation of Queen Victoria 90 Coronation of King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra 90 Accession and Coronation of King George V and Queen Mary 96 Royal Accession and Coronation Oaths 97 Court of Claims 99 FUNERALS General 102 King George II 102 Augusta, Dowager Princess of Wales 102 King George III 102 King William IV 102 William Ewart Gladstone 103 Queen Victoria 103 King Edward VII 104 CEREMONIAL Precedence 106 Court Ceremonial; regulations; appointments; foreign titles and decorations 107 Opening of Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • “Powerful Arms and Fertile Soil”
    “Powerful Arms and Fertile Soil” English Identity and the Law of Arms in Early Modern England Claire Renée Kennedy A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History and Philosophy of Science University of Sydney 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My greatest thanks and appreciation to Ofer Gal, who supervised my PhD with constant interest, insightfulness and support. This thesis owes so much to his helpful conversation and encouraging supervision and guidance. I have benefitted immensely from the suggestions and criticisms of my examiners, John Sutton, Nick Wilding, and Anthony Grafton, to whom I owe a particular debt. Grafton’s suggestion during the very early stages of my candidature that the quarrel between William Camden and Ralph Brooke might provide a promising avenue for research provided much inspiration for the larger project. I am greatly indebted to the staff in the Unit for History and Philosophy of Science: in particular, Hans Pols for his unwavering support and encouragement; Daniela Helbig, for providing some much-needed motivation during the home-stretch; and Debbie Castle, for her encouraging and reassuring presence. I have benefitted immensely from conversations with friends, in and outside the Unit for HPS. This includes, (but is not limited to): Megan Baumhammer, Sahar Tavakoli, Ian Lawson, Nick Bozic, Gemma Lucy Smart, Georg Repnikov, Anson Fehross, Caitrin Donovan, Stefan Gawronski, Angus Cornwell, Brenda Rosales and Carrie Hardie. My particular thanks to Kathryn Ticehurst and Laura Sumrall, for their willingness to read drafts, to listen, and to help me clarify my thoughts and ideas. My thanks also to the Centre for Editing Lives and Letters, University College London, and the History of Science Program, Princeton University, where I benefitted from spending time as a visiting research student.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heraldry of the De Bohun Earls
    The Antiquaries Journal, , ,pp– © The Society of Antiquaries of London, doi:./S. First published online June THE HERALDRY OF THE DE BOHUN EARLS Lucia Diaz Pascual Lucia Diaz Pascual, Baronsmead Road, London SW13 9RR, UK. Email: [email protected] This paper analyses the evidence relating to the heraldry used by the patriarchs of the de Bohun family (1066–1373) as preserved in seal impressions, rolls of arms, manuscripts, wills, inventories and personal objects held in private collections. It traces the development of the family’scoatofarms, as well as the adoption and use by the de Bohun earls of various heraldic symbols (such as the swan, the trefoil, the leopard and the wyvern) to serve as a reminder of the family’s glorious ancestry and its many royal and noble marital alliances. By analysing the unique heraldry adopted by each de Bohun earl, this paper concludes that the family’s noble identity evolved over several generations and that the choice of heraldic symbols by each earl was highly individual, providing a unique insight into their sense of identity and personal values, as well as their desire to ensure family memory. Keywords: Medieval history; sigillography; heraldry; lineage and identity; nobility INTRODUCTION Heraldry, defined by Anthony Wagner as ‘the systematic use of hereditary devices centred upon the shield’, developed in England during the twelfth century. The earliest extant example of a coat of arms, the decorated shield given by Henry I to his son-in-law, Geoffrey of Anjou, when he was knighted, dates from . Originally used to identify the heavily armed knight, by the second quarter of the twelfth century shield designs had become hereditary, being used consistently to associate their owners with certain lands, titles and offices.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Days at the Inns of Court
    STUDENT DAYS AT THE INNS OF COURT.* Fortescue tells us that when King John fixed the Court of Common Pleas at Westminster, the professors of the municipal law who heretofore had been scattered about the kingdom formed themselves into an aggregate body "wholly addicted to the study of the law." This body, having been excluded from Oxford and Cambridge where the civil and canon laws alone were taught, found it necessary to establish a university of its own. This it did by purchasing at various times certain houses between the City of Westminster, where the King's courts were held, and the City of London, where they could obtain their provisions. The nearest of these institutions to the City of London was the Temple. Passing through Ludgate, one came to the bridge over the Fleet Brook and continued down Fleet Street a short distance to Temple Bar where were the Middle, Inner and Outer Temples. The grounds of the Temples reached to the bank of the Thames and the barges of royalty were not infrequently seen drawn up to the landing, when kings and queens would honor the Inns with their presence at some of the elaborate revels. For at Westminster was also the Royal Palace and the Abbey, and the Thames was an easy highway from the market houses and busi- ness offices of London to the royal city of Westminster. Passage on land was a far different matter and at first only the clergy dared risk living beyond the gates, and then only in strongly-walled dwellings. St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Visitation of London Begun in 1687. by Jacob Field
    Third Series Vol. II part 1. ISSN 0010-003X No. 211 Price £12.00 Spring 2006 THE COAT OF ARMS an heraldic journal published twice yearly by The Heraldry Society THE COAT OF ARMS The journal of the Heraldry Society Third series Volume II 2006 Part 1 Number 211 in the original series started in 1952 The Coat of Arms is published twice a year by The Heraldry Society, whose registered office is 53 High Street, Burnham, Slough SL1 7JX. The Society was registered in England in 1956 as registered charity no. 241456. Founding Editor † John Brooke-Little, C.V.O., M.A., F.H.S. Honorary Editors C. E. A. Cheesman, M.A., PH.D., Rouge Dragon Pursuivant M. P. D. O'Donoghue, M.A., Bluemantle Pursuivant Editorial Committee Adrian Ailes, B.A., F.S.A., F.H.S. Andrew Hanham, B.A., PH.D Advertizing Manager John Tunesi of Liongam GENTRY AT THE CENTRE Jacob Field The Visitation of London begun in 1687, edd. T. C. Wales and C. P. Hartley. Harleian Society publications new series, 16-17 (2003-4). 2 vols. London: The Harleian Society, 2005. The 1687 visitation of London was the last held in England and Wales. It has recent• ly been published in two parts by the Harleian Society, edited by Tim Wales and Carol Hartley. London was easily the largest city in the nation, and the centre of pol• itics, culture and economy.1 As such, the 1687 visitation of London holds a dual his• torical importance as both the last visitation in English history, but also an account of the gentry who inhabited England's wealthiest and most important centre of pop• ulation.2 The edition draws on the visitation pedigrees, as well as various other ancil• lary sources, including two notebooks; one from the College of Arms, and one from the Guildhall.3 Henry VIII inaugurated the system of visitations in 1530, making two senior heralds, Clarenceux and Norroy Kings of Arms, responsible for making periodic vis• its to the counties to ensure all arms were borne with proper authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund Plowden, Master Treasurer of the Middle Temple
    The Catholic Lawyer Volume 3 Number 1 Volume 3, January 1957, Number 1 Article 7 Edmund Plowden, Master Treasurer of the Middle Temple Richard O'Sullivan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Catholic Studies Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EDMUND PLOWDEN' MASTER TREASURER OF THE MIDDLE TEMPLE (1561-1570) RICHARD O'SULLIVAN D ENUO SURREXIT DOMUS: the Latin inscription high on the outside wall of this stately building announces and records the fact that in the year 1949, under the hand of our Royal Treasurer, Elizabeth the Queen, the Hall of the Middle Temple rose again and became once more the centre of our professional life and aspiration. To those who early in the war had seen the destruction of these walls and the shattering of the screen and the disappearance of the Minstrels' Gallery; and to those who saw the timbers of the roof ablaze upon a certain -midnight in March 1944, the restoration of Domus must seem something of a miracle. All these things naturally link our thought with the work and the memory of Edmund Plowden who, in the reign of an earlier Queen Elizabeth, devoted his years as Treasurer and as Master of the House to the building of this noble Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Archdeacon's Marriage Bonds
    Oxford Archdeacons’ Marriage Bond Extracts 1 1634 - 1849 Year Groom Parish Bride Parish 1634 Allibone, John Overworton Wheeler, Sarah Overworton 1634 Allowaie,Thomas Mapledurham Holmes, Alice Mapledurham 1634 Barber, John Worcester Weston, Anne Cornwell 1634 Bates, Thomas Monken Hadley, Herts Marten, Anne Witney 1634 Bayleyes, William Kidlington Hutt, Grace Kidlington 1634 Bickerstaffe, Richard Little Rollright Rainbowe, Anne Little Rollright 1634 Bland, William Oxford Simpson, Bridget Oxford 1634 Broome, Thomas Bicester Hawkins, Phillis Bicester 1634 Carter, John Oxford Walter, Margaret Oxford 1634 Chettway, Richard Broughton Gibbons, Alice Broughton 1634 Colliar, John Wootton Benn, Elizabeth Woodstock 1634 Coxe, Luke Chalgrove Winchester, Katherine Stadley 1634 Cooper, William Witney Bayly, Anne Wilcote 1634 Cox, John Goring Gaunte, Anne Weston 1634 Cunningham, William Abbingdon, Berks Blake, Joane Oxford 1634 Curtis, John Reading, Berks Bonner, Elizabeth Oxford 1634 Day, Edward Headington Pymm, Agnes Heddington 1634 Dennatt, Thomas Middleton Stoney Holloway, Susan Eynsham 1634 Dudley, Vincent Whately Ward, Anne Forest Hill 1634 Eaton, William Heythrop Rymmel, Mary Heythrop 1634 Eynde, Richard Headington French, Joane Cowley 1634 Farmer, John Coggs Townsend, Joane Coggs 1634 Fox, Henry Westcot Barton Townsend, Ursula Upper Tise, Warc 1634 Freeman, Wm Spellsbury Harris, Mary Long Hanburowe 1634 Goldsmith, John Middle Barton Izzley, Anne Westcot Barton 1634 Goodall, Richard Kencott Taylor, Alice Kencott 1634 Greenville, Francis Inner
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Wootton Bassett and Cricklade Area Board Place: Access the Online Meeting Here
    AGENDA Meeting: Royal Wootton Bassett and Cricklade Area Board Place: Access the online meeting here Date: Wednesday 25 November 2020 Time: 6.00 pm Including the Parishes of Braydon, Broad Town, Clyffe Pypard, Cricklade, Latton, Lydiard Millicent, Lydiard Tregoz, Lyneham & Bradenstoke, Marston Meysey, Purton, Tockenham and Royal Wootton Bassett The Area Board welcomes and invites contributions from members of the public in this online meeting If you wish to participate in the discussion, please contact Kev Fielding (Democratic Services Officer), direct line 01249 706612 or email [email protected] You will be provided with a link to participate in the meeting online Registrations to speak should be made no later than 5pm on the day of the meeting. If possible, please indicate the item(s) you wish to speak on, to assist the Chairman to manage requests Guidance on how to access this meeting online is available here Any member of the public who wishes to watch the meeting only, can do so via the link at the top of this agenda All the papers connected with this meeting are available on the Council’s website at www.wiltshire.gov.uk Press enquiries to Communications on direct lines (01225) 713114 /713115 ______________________________________________________________________ Wiltshire Councillors Cllr Allison Bucknell - Lyneham (Chairman) Cllr Mollie Groom - Royal Wootton Bassett East Cllr Mary Champion - Royal Wootton Bassett North Cllr Jacqui Lay - Purton Cllr Chris Hurst - Royal Wootton Bassett South Cllr Bob Jones MBE - Cricklade and Latton Page 1 Recording and Broadcasting Information Wiltshire Council may record this meeting for live and/or subsequent broadcast on the Council’s website at http://www.wiltshire.public-i.tv.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom of Atlantia Scribal Handbook
    Kingdom of Atlantia Scribal Handbook TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to 2016 Revision 4 Scribal Arts Primer Analysing a Style—Kingdom of Lochac 6 Layout and Design of Scrolls—Kingdoms of the Middle & Atlantia 9 Contemporary Techniques for Producing Scrolls and Advice for 11 Choosing Tools and Materials—Kingdom of the Middle Illumination The Ten Commandments to Illuminators—Kingdom of the West 19 Advice on Painting—Kingdom of the Middle 20 Design and Construction of Celtic Knotwork—Kingdom of the West 27 Calligraphy The Ten Commandments to Calligraphers—Kingdom of the West 31 Advice on Calligraphy—Kingdom of the Middle 32 The Sinister Scribe—Kingdom of the Middle 34 How to Form Letter—Kingdom of the Middle 36 Calligraphy Exemplars—Kingdom of the Middle 38 Heraldry and Heraldic Display Interpreting a Blazon 51 Heraldry for Scribes—Kingdom of the West 52 Blazoning of Creatures—Kingdom of Atlantia 66 Achievements in Heraldic Display—Kingdom of Atlantia 73 Some Helms and Shields Used in Heraldic Art—Kingdom of the Middle 83 Atlantian Scroll Conventions Artistic Expectations for Kingdom scrolls 87 Typographical Conventions for scroll texts 87 Kingdom Policy Regarding the College of Scribes 88 Kingdom Law Regarding the College of Scribes 90 How to Receive a Kingdom Scroll Assignment 90 Kingdom Law pertaining to the issuance of scrolls 88 Scroll Text Conventions in the Kingdom of Atlantia 89 Mix and Match Scroll Texts 91 List of SCA Dates 94 List of Atlantian Monarchs 95 Scroll Texts by Type of Award 97 Non-Armigerous Awards Fountain 101 Herring 102 King’s Award of Excellence (KAE) 103 Nonpariel 104 Queen’s Order of Courtesy (QOC) 105 Shark’s Tooth 106 Silver Nautilus 107 Star of the Sea 108 Undine 109 Vexillum Atlantia 110 Order of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Church, Inner Temple Lane, London
    case study 10 Temple Church, Inner Temple Lane, London Norman in origin Church of Inner and Middle Temple, Inns of Court Architect of refurbishment: Christopher Wren (1632–1723) See St Peter Cornhill (CS9) for information on Sir Christopher Wren Historical note The Temple consists of two societies established for the study and practice of law: the Inner Temple and the Middle Temple. Although both communities function separately and have their own buildings on the site, they both use the same church, known as Temple Church, a reference to its Templar origin. The church was “repaired, adorned and beautified at the joynt expense of the two honourable societies” as praised by John Standish in his sermon after the reopening in 1683. The round church is exemplar for the Templars and is Norman in architec- ture, while the choir is early English. The church underwent subsequent re- pairs and escaped destruction in several fires in 1666, 1677, 1678.1 In 1682 the church was beautified according to “The New View of London” following the reconstruction of many city churches after the Great Fire. A negative descrip- tion of the seventeenth-century alterations is given by Thornbury in 1878. In the reign of Charles II the body of the church was filled with formal pews, which concealed the bases of the columns, while the walls were encumbered, to the height of eight feet from the ground, with oak wain- scoting, which was carried entirely around the church, so as to hide the elegant marble piscine, the interesting almeries over the high altar and the sacrarium on the eastern side of the edifice.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Template
    Item No: 1 MOUNTEVANS, MAYOR COURT OF COMMON COUNCIL 3rd March 2016 MEMBERS PRESENT ALDERMEN Nicholas Anstee Timothy Russell Hailes JP Julian Henry Malins QC Sir Michael David Bear Gordon Warwick Haines The Rt Hon the Lord Mayor, The Lord Sheriff Charles Bowman Peter Lionel Raleigh Hewitt, JP Mountevans, Jeffrey Evans Peter Estlin Sir Paul Judge Dr Andrew Charles Parmley John Garbutt Vincent Thomas Keaveny William Anthony Bowater Russell Sir Roger Gifford Ian David Luder JP The Rt Hon the Baroness Patricia Scotland of Alison Gowman Professor Michael Raymond Mainelli Asthal, QC COMMONERS George Christopher Abrahams Emma Edhem Gregory Alfred Lawrence Henrika Johanna Sofia Priest John David Absalom, Deputy Anthony Noel Eskenzi, CBE, Vivienne Littlechild JP Chris Punter Randall Keith Anderson Deputy Oliver Arthur Wynlayne Lodge, TD Delis Regis Alex Bain-Stewart JP Sophie Anne Fernandes Edward Lord, OBE, JP Adam Fox McCloud John Alfred Barker, OBE, Deputy John William Fletcher Professor John Stuart Penton Richardson Douglas Barrow, Deputy William Barrie Fraser, OBE, Lumley Elizabeth Rogula John Bennett, Deputy Deputy Paul Nicholas Martinelli Virginia Rounding Nicholas Michael Bensted-Smith, JP Stuart John Fraser, CBE Jeremy Mayhew James de Sausmarez Christopher Paul Boden Marianne Bernadette Fredericks Catherine McGuinness, Deputy John George Stewart Scott, JP Mark Boleat Lucy Frew Andrew Stratton McMurtrie, JP Ian Christopher Norman Keith David Forbes Bottomley George Marr Flemington Gillon Wendy Mead, OBE Seaton Revd Dr William Goodacre
    [Show full text]
  • An Exchange of Letters
    AN EXCHANGE OF LETTERS Heraldry Gazette - December 2007 After the Birmingham International Heraldry Conference this year, the following letters were exchanged between Mr Ralph Brocklebank and Garter Principal King of Arms, Mr Peter Gwynn-Jones. Both correspondents were keen to share their thoughts with readers of the Heraldry Gazette and the editor hopes that they will inspire some lively and interesting debate through this publication’s correspondence columns. From Ralph Brocklebank to Garter King of Arms: The Birmingham International Heraldry Conference held earlier this month was rated a great success by those who attended, and finished with a debate on the Future of Heraldry. I thought you might be interested to hear some of the concerns and points that were discussed. It was generally felt that if heraldry is to have a prosperous and flourishing future, it needs to take greater account of changes in society, such as the increasing emancipation of women and the disappearance of class barriers. There is a large number of worthy people who have a nascent interest in heraldry as something belonging to our English heritage, but are given to believe that it is only for the rich and famous, or else of purely historic value. They need to be encouraged to think that heraldry is something that they can embrace personally, to have a family asset that can be passed down to their children and successive descendants. One of the deterrents to getting involved was seen to be the high cost of a Grant of Arms. It was asked whether it would not be possible to institute a form of Certificate of Arms that would confirm the legality of a Grant without incurring the expense of a luxurious Letters Patent, to be offered as an alternative.
    [Show full text]