Holderness Coast Erosion and the Significance of Ords

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Holderness Coast Erosion and the Significance of Ords EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, VOL. 10, 107-124 (1985) HOLDERNESS COAST EROSION AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ORDS ADA W. PRINGLE (nee PHILLIPS) Department of Geography, University of Laneaster. Laneaster LA1 4YR. U.K. Received 13 October 1983 Revised 30 June 1984 ABSTRACT A sample ord, a low section of beach characteristic of the Holderness coast, is examined as it moved southwards between 1977 and 1983 and its significant role in coast erosion is demonstrated. The reduction in beach level at the cliff foot by up to 3.9m enabled most HWN tides to reach it, as compared with only some HWS tides along the inter-ord beach, and the volume of till eroded from the cliffs increased by eight times to an annual mean of 72m3m-’. The Holderness tills are shown to be composed of 31 per cent sand and coarser sediment which is the sediment range of the beaches. Where an ord is sited the massive injection of beach sediment goes to form the ord’s most prominent constructional feature, the lower beach ridge which extends southwards from the centre of the ord. Analysis of 12 months’ observer wave data collected at Withernsea in 1969/70indicates that a net southward sand movement of l44000m~occurred. Comparison of this rate with beach sediment input rates along the whole coast backed by till cliffs suggests a sediment deficit at the northern end and a surplus towards the southern end. This conclusion is supported by an overall increase in beach sediment volume southwards from Barmston. Within this longshore sediment transport system, the ords migrate southwards from their point of origin in the Barmston-Skipsea area, without losing their identity until reaching the tip of Spurn Head. KEY WORDS Rhythmic beach feature Till cliff erosion Beach sediment input Wave analysis Longshore sediment movement INTRODUCTION The 60 km long Holderness coast, lying between the chalk promontory of Flamborough Head in the north and the sand and shingle spit of Spurn Head in the south takes the form of a zeta-cume (see Figure 1). The coast is backed by Pleistocene glacial till cliffs, which are renowned for their very rapid rate of erosion, calculated by Valentin (1954) as 1.2myr-’. This provides sand and coarser sediment for the beach, whilst silt and clay is carried away in suspension by waves and currents. The form of the beach and its response to varying wind, wave and tidal conditions was considered in an earlier paper (Pringle, 1981). It was observed that the most rapid rate of erosion occurred at the positions of low sections of beach, which form irregularly-spa& rhythmic features along the coast between Barmston in the north, and Spurn Head in the south. These features known locally as ‘ords’ migrate southwards along this coast, moving their associated zones of maximum cliff erosion with them. The characteristics of an ord are shown in Figure 2. The relationship of ords to previously described rhythmic coastal features found on a variety of coasts throughout the world (Komar, 1976) was examined earlier (Pringle, 1981) and it was concluded that the only similar feature was the low sections between ‘beach pads’ identified on St. Joseph Peninsula, Florida, U.S.A. (Entsminger, 1977). The absence of sand bars below Low Water Mark along the Holderness coast and the general absence of rip currents do not suggest the presence of cellular flows with which many other rhythmic features are associated; nor does it seem likely that ords are related to edge wave formation because of their wide, irregular spacing. 0 1 97-933 7/85/020 1 07- 1 8$0 1.80 0 1985 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 108 A. W.PRINGLE Figure 1. Location map This paper reports on the study of a selected, sample ord as it migrated along the southern part of the Holderness coast between 1977 and 1983. Its movement has been monitored since 1969, when it was centred 250m south of Withernsea and Scott (1976) studied its development as it migrated from Hollym to Holmpton between 1973 and 1976. It has subsequently continued its southerly movement to lie south of Dimlington ORDS AND COASTAL EROSION 109 1 Steep, rapidly eroding till cliff 2 Lower angled, more stable cliff 3 Upper beach of coarse sand and pebbles 4 Till shore platform with armoured mud balls 5 Water-filled channel 6 Lower beach sand ridge 7 Lower beach, sand with surface water Figure 2. The characteristic features of a Holderness ord Highland in April 1983. This represents an overall movement of 7 km, or on average 0.5 kmyr- between 1969 and 1983. MONITORING THE SAMPLE ORD Field surveys were carried out in April and October each year from 1977 to 1983 to measure winter and summer changes respectively, and during the first three years, two additional surveys were made during the summer. The position of the ord was surveyed relative to a datum point at Old Hive, and within the ord five cross-profiles and one linking longitudinal profile were surveyed by automatic level and related to Ordnance Datum. The most northerly and southerly cross-profiles demarcated the limits of the ord along the coast and the remaining three cross-profiles were positioned within its central part. Height variations were thus recorded throughout the ord together with the extent and form of the main elements: the upper beach towards both ends, and the till platform and lower beach sand bar which characterize the central section. A plan of the ord was constructed from the survey data and further observations, which enabled area measurement to be made (see Figure 3). Cliff top erosion measurements were taken in April 1978 and 1979 and at six-month intervals thereafter. The datum points established for these were spaced at closer intervals than those of the Holderness Borough Council from which additional data was obtained annually each autumn. From these cliff top measurements volumes of till eroded from the cliffs were calculated, and, taking the composition of the till into account, volumes of sand and coarser sediment supplied to the beach could be estimated. As it was not possible to install a wave recorder for this project, wave measurements could be taken only at survey times from the coast although this data can be compared with daily observer wave measurements taken for 12 months in 1969/70. Three-hourly wind data was obtained throughout the whole period 1977 to 1983 from the Meteorological Office for Spurn Head. MOVEMENT OF THE ORD ALONG THE COAST The average rate of movement of 0.5 km southwards per year masks considerable variation as shown in Table I. The figures were calculated from the mid-point position of the exposure of till shore platform at or 11.4.8 NWI I SE IIIII 11111111I,,IIII I11111 11 (1111 111[1111,#, 750 1ooo 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 2750 3OoO A Upper beach sand and shingle Lower beach sand ridge Lower beach sand with surface water ? 1 Till shore platform Till shore platform wlth patches 1.4.8 of upper beach sedment Upper beach sediment wlth surface water m Water A to E Cross profiles NW SE Ill 1111111111111,1,111,,~~~~~1 20oo 2250 2500 2750 3ooo 3250 3500 B metres southeast of OM Hive Datum Figure 3. Ord plans. A: Under high wave energy, northerly storm conditions, with a tidal surge on 11.04.82. B Under low wave energy conditions on 01.04.83 ORDS AND COASTAL EROSION 111 Table I. Rate of movement of Ord Per 05yr Per year Date (m) (m) 4.4.77 - 29.10.77 668 S 7.4.78 68 S 736 S 21.10.78 245 S 14.4.79 175 S 420 S 2 1.10.79 360 S 16.4.80 355 N 5s 25.10.80 197 S 18.4.8 1 368 S 565 S 30.10.8 1 287 S 1 1.4.82 190 S 417 S 23.10.82 395 s 1.4.83 380 S 715 S Total 1977-1983 2978 S Annual mean 496 S close to the cliff foot. The half-yearly rates of movement varied between 668 m southwards and 355 m northwards. The latter was the only northward movement recorded and it was produced when the ord lengthened in both directions. The annual rates varied between 5 m southwards (this including the northward six-monthly record) and 775m southwards. It is noteworthy that the mean annual movement of 496m southwards for the six years 1977 to 1983 is almost the same as that already noted for the period 1969 to 1983. CHANGING FEATURES WITHIN THE ORD Height variations The height of the beach or exposed till shore-platform controls the degree of exposure of the cliff foot to direct wave attack and is therefore very important when considering varying rates of cliff erosion. Table 11 shows variations in cliff-foot height between the ord’s northern and southern ends, where cross-profile A and E respectively were surveyed, and its lower central section surveyed by cross-profiles B, C,and D. The 19 surveys carried out between 1977 and 1983 show that the mean heights of the northern and southern ends were 3.91 m and 3.37 m OD respectively (ranging between extremes of 2.61 m and 5.37 m at the north end, and 0.97 m and 5.25 m at the south end). Within the ord the mean height was 2.56 m OD (ranging between extremes of 0.90m and 4.18m). The height range within individual surveys varied between 1.06m and 3.87m, with a mean of 2.20 m.
Recommended publications
  • Geography: Example Erosion
    The Physical and Human Causes of Erosion The Holderness Coast By The British Geographer Situation The Holderness coast is located on the east coast of England and is part of the East Riding of Yorkshire; a lowland agricultural region of England that lies between the chalk hills of the Wolds and the North Sea. Figure 1 The Holderness Coast is one of Europe's fastest eroding coastlines. The average annual rate of erosion is around 2 metres per year but in some sections of the coast, rates of loss are as high as 10 metres per year. The reason for such high rates of coastal erosion can be attributed to both physical and human causes. Physical Causes The main reason for coastal erosion at Holderness is geological. The bedrock is made up of till. This material was deposited by glaciers around 12,000 years ago and is unconsolidated. It is made up of mixture of bulldozed clays and erratics, which are loose rocks of varying type. This boulder clay sits on layer of seaward sloping chalk. The geology and topography of the coastal plain and chalk hills can be seen in figure 2. Figure 2 The boulder clay with erratics can be seen in figure 3. As we can see in figures 2 and 3, the Holderness Coast is a lowland coastal plain deposited by glaciers. The boulder clay is experiencing more rapid rates of erosion compared to the chalk. An outcrop of chalk can be seen to the north and forms the headland, Flamborough Head. The section of coastline is a 60 kilometre stretch from Flamborough Head in the north to Spurn Point in the south.
    [Show full text]
  • HOLDERNESS COAST FISHERY LOCAL ACTION GROUP DRAFT STRATEGY May 2011
    Sustainable Seas - Better Businesses - Closer Communities HOLDERNESS COAST FISHERY LOCAL ACTION GROUP DRAFT STRATEGY May 2011 1 Contents 1. Introduction Page 3 2. A Coastal Area with a Distinctive Identity Page 4 3. The Holderness Coast Fishery Page 11 4. SWOT Analysis Page 18 5. Key Issues Affecting the Fishing Industry and its Communities Page 20 6. The Role of the FLAG Page 22 7. Development of the Strategy Page 23 8. Strategic Objective Page 24 9. Priority Themes and Programmes Page 24 10. Delivery of the Strategy Page 36 11. Measuring Success Page 41 Appendix 1 Consultation List Appendix 2 Summary of Key Projects Appendix 3 FLAG Board Members Appendix 4 Partnership Agreement Appendix 5 FLAG Co-ordinator Job Description Appendix 6 Expression of Interest Form Appendix 7 Project Application Form Appendix 8 Application Process Appendix 9 Project Selection Criteria 2 1 Introduction The Holderness Coast Fishery Local Action Group (FLAG) area covers all of the coastal parishes in the East Riding of Yorkshire from Bempton and Flamborough in the north to Easington in the south. The area encompasses the main fishing communities and resort towns of Bridlington, Hornsea and Withernsea, together with smaller landings at Flamborough, Tunstall and Easington (see map 1). The area has a coastline of over 40 miles, from the chalk cliffs of Flamborough Head, by way of the brown sea-washed cliffs of Bridlington Bay to the sand and shingle banks of Spurn Point. The FLAG area has a population of 63,761, the largest settlement and principal fishing town being Bridlington which has a population of 35,192 while the remainder of this relatively remote coastal area has a low density of population.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Council Meeting 8 March 2017
    Beswick Parish Council Meeting of the Council held at 7 pm on Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at Kilnwick Village Hall DRAFT MINUTES 1 Apologies for Absence: Apologies received from Cllr Plowman. Present: Parish Councillors Reid (Chair), Scaife, Feasby, Quinn, Julia Bugg (Clerk) and 2 members of the parish. 2 Declarations of pecuniary and non-pecuniary interests: None. 3 Minutes: Minutes of the meeting held on 11 January 2017 were approved as an accurate record. 4 Matters Arising from the Minutes: 4 Tuesday Club/Club for Retirees. Cllr Reid reported that attendance at the meetings on 31 January and 28 February were heartening (25 and 28 persons, respectively). At the next meeting (28 March), guest speakers Ron and Helen Chambers will be giving a presentation on Bees and Flowers. A trip to Lincoln Castle has been organised for 27 April. 4 Damage to Bench in Beswick. Cllr Scaife reported that the bench has been repaired and is now back in place. An invoice has been submitted and payment requested. Action: Clerk to inform ERYC that the repair has been carried out. Additionally, the Beswick South bus shelter guttering has been repaired and a request made for payment. 5 Proposed Storage Development at LKAB Minerals. Cllr Reid reported on correspondence with LKAB on possible contributions by LKAB to the Council for community projects. John Wallace has passed our request on to senior managers; awaiting decision. 9 Appointment of Internal Auditor. Cllr Quinn reported that Kate Johnson has once again agreed to act as IA. 10.1 Copy for Newsletter. Cllr Reid stated that, following the distribution of a draft version, the preparation was almost complete.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Appointments to Outside Bodies 2021/22
    EAST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE COUNCIL List of appointments to Outside Bodies 2021/22 NB -All appointments are made at the Council AGM for the period of the municipal year unless otherwise stated. National, Regional and Sub-Regional Organisations Outside Body Representatives CATCH Board Cllr Evison County Councils Network Cllr Owen Cllr Holtby Cllr Aitken Cllr V Walker Hull & East Riding Unitary Leaders’ Board Cllr Owen Cllr Holtby Humber Coast and Vale Chairs and Members Group Cllr V Walker Humber Leadership Board Cllr Owen Cllr Holtby Humber Strategy Comprehensive Review Elected Members Cllr Matthews Forum Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust – Council of Cllr Wilkinson Governors Humberside Crimestoppers Cllr Padden Humberside Fire Authority Cllr Chadwick Cllr Dennis Cllr Fox Cllr Green Cllr Healing Cllr Smith Cllr Davison Cllr Jefferson LEP - Hull & East Yorkshire LEP Board Cllr Owen - Sub-Boards to be confirmed Local Government Association Cllr Owen Cllr Holtby Cllr Lee Cllr Nolan (observer) - Coastal Special Interest Group Cllr Matthews - Rural Services Network Cllr Evison v1_FINAL 07/07/21 WEB Outside Body Representatives North Eastern IFCA Cllr Matthews Cllr Copsey Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust Vacancy Council of Governors Police and Crime Panel Cllr Gateshill Cllr Nickerson Cllr Abraham Substitutes - Cllr Weeks/Cllr Birch Rail North Committee Cllr McMaster Reserved Forces and Cadets Association for Yorkshire and Cllr Elvidge the Humber Cllr Wilkinson SWAP Internal Audit Partnership Members’ Board Cllr Temple Substitute
    [Show full text]
  • Paying for the Party
    PX_PARTY_HDS:PX_PARTY_HDS 16/4/08 11:48 Page 1 Paying for the Party Myths and realities in British political finance Michael Pinto-Duschinsky edited by Roger Gough Policy Exchange is an independent think tank whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas which will foster a free society based on strong communities, personal freedom, limited government, national self-confidence and an enterprise culture. Registered charity no: 1096300. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development. We work in partnership with aca- demics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy out- comes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Tru, stees Charles Moore (Chairman of the Board), Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Camilla Cavendish, Robin Edwards, Richard Ehrman, Virginia Fraser, Lizzie Noel, George Robinson, Andrew Sells, Tim Steel, Alice Thomson, Rachel Whetstone PX_PARTY_HDS:PX_PARTY_HDS 16/4/08 11:48 Page 2 About the author Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky is senior Nations, the European Union, Council of research fellow at Brunel University and a Europe, Commonwealth Secretariat, the recognised worldwide authority on politi- British Foreign and Commonwealth cal finance. A former fellow of Merton Office and the Home Office. He was a College, Oxford, and Pembroke College, founder governor of the Westminster Oxford, he is president of the International Foundation for Democracy. In 2006-07 he Political Science Association’s research was the lead witness before the Committee committee on political finance and politi- on Standards in Public Life in its review of cal corruption and a board member of the the Electoral Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rural Economy of Holderness Medieval
    !. ii' i ~ , ! The Rural Economy of Medieval i li i Holderness h i By D. J. SIDDLE HE student of the medieval landscape The plain of Holderness is the triangular is often confronted by apparently con- peninsula which forms the south-eastern ex- T flicting evidence. This fact is nowhere tremity of Yorkshire. The region is bounded better illustrated than in the plain of Holder- to the west and north by the dip slopes of the ness, one of England's smallest and most dis- Yorkshire Wolds, and to the south and east tinctive regions. The chronicler of the Cister- by the Humber estuary and the North Sea. cian monastery of Meaux (in the Hull valley), In the case of Holderness, the use of the word recording the partition of lands which fol- plain is deceptive. Within the limits of its lowed the Norman conquest, noted that the subdued relief, the region contains consider- new earle of Holderness inherited a land; able topographical variety. In the east are a "... which was exceedingly barren and in- series of arcuate moraines, extending from fertile at this time, so that it produced nothing north-east to south-east, representing various but oats. ''1 In his recent study of the Domes- stages in the glacial retreat. They often rise day material, Maxwell summarizes the Hol- to 25 ft, but are rarely above 5° ft. Much dis- derness returns in this way, "... in spite of its sected by post-glacial stream erosion, these marshy nature, Holderness was the most areas of boulder clay display little continuity, prosperous part of the East Riding in the especially in south Holderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England
    If LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES FURTHER REVIEW OF THE COUNTY OF HUMBERSIDE NORTH YORKSHIRE EAST YORKSHIRE HUMBERSIDE EAST YORKSHIRE _J \\HOLDERNESS BOROUGH OF BEVERLEY ^KINGSTON UPON HU SOUTH YORKSHIRE LINCOLNSHIRE REPORT NO. 604 I I I I I I I • LOCAL GOVERNMENT I BOUNDARY COMMISSION I FOR ENGLAND iI REPORT NO. 604 i i i i i i i i i I I I • LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND I I CHAIRMAN MR G J ELLERTON I MEMBERS MR K F J ENNALS MR G R PRENTICE I MRS H R V SARKANY I MR C W SMITH I PROFESSOR K YOUNG I I I I I I I I I I I CONTENTS The Making of Numberside The Progress of the Humberside Reviews 2.1 The Commission's Initial Review i 2.2 The Secretary of State's Direction 2.3 The Commission's Further Review 2.4 The Commission's Interim Decision 2.5 The Commission's Draft Proposal i 2.6 The Response to the Commission's Draft Proposal i The Commission's Approach to the Further Review and its Consideration of the Case For and Against Change i 3.1 The Criteria for Boundary Changes 3.2 The Wishes of the People 3.3 The Pattern of Community Life 3.4 The Effective Operation of Local Government and i Associated Services i The Commission's Conclusions and Final Proposal 4.1 The Commission's Conclusions 4.2 The Commission's Final Proposal i 4.3 Electoral Consequences 4.4 Second Order Boundary Issues 4.5 Unitary Authorities i 4.6 Publication i i Annexes 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Census Report for Parliamentary Constituencies
    Reference maps Page England and Wales North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 42 North West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 43 Yorkshire & The Humber: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 44 East Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 45 West Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 46 East of England: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 47 London: County & Parliamentary Constituencies 48 South East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 49 South West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 50 Wales: Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 51 Scotland Scotland: Scottish Parliamentary Regions 52 Central Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 53 Glasgow Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 54 Highlands and Islands Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 55 Lothians Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 56 Mid Scotland and Fife Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 57 North East Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 58 South of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 59 West of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 60 Northern Ireland Northern Ireland: Parliamentary Constituencies 61 41 Reference maps Census 2001: Report for Parliamentary Constituencies North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies Key government office region parliamentary constituencies counties
    [Show full text]
  • Holderness Coast (United Kingdom)
    EUROSION Case Study HOLDERNESS COAST (UNITED KINGDOM) Contact: Paul SISTERMANS Odelinde NIEUWENHUIS DHV group 57 Laan 1914 nr.35, 3818 EX Amersfoort PO Box 219 3800 AE Amersfoort The Netherlands Tel: +31 (0)33 468 37 00 Fax: +31 (0)33 468 37 48 [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] 1 EUROSION Case Study 1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA 1.1 Physical process level 1.1.1 Classification One of the youngest natural coastlines of England is the Holderness Coast, a 61 km long stretch of low glacial drift cliffs 3m to 35m in height. The Holderness coast stretches from Flamborough Head in the north to Spurn Head in the south. The Holderness coast mainly exists of soft glacial drift cliffs, which have been cut back up to 200 m in the last century. On the softer sediment, the crumbling cliffs are fronted by beach-mantled abrasion ramps that decline gradually to a smoothed sea floor. The Holderness coast is a macro-tidal coast, according to the scoping study the classification of the coast is: 2. Soft rock coasts High and low glacial sea cliffs 1.1.2 Geology About a million years ago the Yorkshire coastline was a line of chalk cliffs almost 32 km west of where it now is. During the Pleistocene Ice Age (18,000 years ago) deposits of glacial till (soft boulder clay) were built up against these cliffs to form the new coastline. The boulder clay consists of about 72% mud, 27% sand and 1% boulders and large Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Holderness Borough Council Election Results 1973-1991
    Holderness Borough Council Election Results 1973-1991 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Roll Back'
    1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The purpose of this policy guidance is to provide a proactive and consistent approach within the planning system to enable the ‘roll back’ of permanent residential and agricultural dwellings/farmsteads that are at risk from coastal erosion. This policy guidance is proposed as an interim measure, to be used primarily as a development control tool, until it can be incorporated into the Council’s Local Development Framework (LDF)1. This guidance is not a statutory document and therefore does not carry the same weight as a policy contained within the LDF. 1.2 The LDF is in its preliminary stages, and will contain a number of statutory Development Plan Documents (DPDs) on specific planning topics such as housing, employment and the environment. It is intended that this policy guidance is included in the ‘Preferred Options’ version of the Housing DPD, scheduled to be published in June 2006 for public consultation. The weight attached to the policy will therefore increase throughout this process leading up to formal adoption. The full time-scale for the LDF is set out in the Council’s Local Development Scheme (LDS)2. 1.3 ‘Roll back’ is a term used to describe relocating property and infrastructure further inland from the eroding coast. The concept of ‘roll back’ stems from policy aims set out in the East Riding Integrated Coastal Zone Management Plan3, which seek to manage coastal change by promoting alternatives to hard-engineered coastal protection works. 1.4 Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) is a relatively new approach to coastal management, promoted by the European Commission as a means of involving the local community in addressing environmental, social and economic challenges that arise in coastal areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartogram [1883 WORDS]
    Vol. 6: Dorling/Cartogram/entry Dorling, D. (forthcoming) Cartogram, Chapter in Monmonier, M., Collier, P., Cook, K., Kimerling, J. and Morrison, J. (Eds) Volume 6 of the History of Cartography: Cartography in the Twentieth Century, Chicago: Chicago University Press. [This is a pre-publication Draft, written in 2006, edited in 2009, edited again in 2012] Cartogram A cartogram can be thought of as a map in which at least one aspect of scale, such as distance or area, is deliberately distorted to be proportional to a variable of interest. In this sense, a conventional equal-area map is a type of area cartogram, and the Mercator projection is a cartogram insofar as it portrays land areas in proportion (albeit non-linearly) to their distances from the equator. According to this definition of cartograms, which treats them as a particular group of map projections, all conventional maps could be considered as cartograms. However, few images usually referred to as cartograms look like conventional maps. Many other definitions have been offered for cartograms. The cartography of cartograms during the twentieth century has been so multifaceted that no solid definition could emerge—and multiple meanings of the word continue to evolve. During the first three quarters of that century, it is likely that most people who drew cartograms believed that they were inventing something new, or at least inventing a new variant. This was because maps that were eventually accepted as cartograms did not arise from cartographic orthodoxy but were instead produced mainly by mavericks. Consequently, they were tolerated only in cartographic textbooks, where they were often dismissed as marginal, map-like objects rather than treated as true maps, and occasionally in the popular press, where they appealed to readers’ sense of irony.
    [Show full text]