DOCSLIB.ORG

Measúnú Straitéiseach Comhshaoil Strategic Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EASTERN Rialacháin na gComhphobal Eorpach (Measúnú agus Bainistiú Priacal Tuile) 2010 agus 2015 European Communities (Assessment and Management of Flood Risks) Regulations 2010 and 2015 Dréachtphlean um Bainistiú Priacal Tuile Draft Flood Risk Management Plan Measúnú Straitéiseach Comhshaoil Strategic Environmental Assessment AB10 – Abhóca – Abhainn Fheartraí UoM10 – Avoca-Vartry I gcomhpháirtíocht le In partnership with Ná tóg as an áit an t-imleabhar seo agus ná scríobh air – chun críche comhairliúcháin amháin Please do not remove or write on this volume - for consultation purposes only Eastern CFRAM Study UoM10 Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Client OPW Project Title Eastern CFRAM Study Document Title IBE0600Rp0043_E_SEA_Environmental_Report_UoM10_D01 RPS Document No. IBE0600Rp0043 OPW Document No. E10_SEA_PART01 DCS TOC Text List of Tables List of Figures No. of This Document Appendices Comprises 1 1 130 1 1 6 Rev. Status Author(s) Reviewed By Approved By Office of Origin Issue Date R. Bingham D01 Draft Various G. Glasgow Belfast 20/07/2016 A. Gaughran Copyright Copyright - Office of Public Works. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from the Office of Public Works. LEGAL DISCLAIMER Is le haghaidh comhairliúcháin amháin atá na dréacht-Phleananna um Bainistiú Priacal Tuile ceaptha. Ní ceart iad a úsáid ná brath orthu chun críche ar bith eile ná mar chuid de phróiseas cinnteoireachta. Féadfar iad a uasdhátú, a bheachtú nó a athrú sula gcríochnófar iad. Is ceartas forchoimeádtha é ag Coimisinéirí na nOibreacha Poiblí in Éirinn athrú a dhéánamh ar an ábhar agus/nó cur i láthair d’aon chuid den bhfaisnéis atá curtha ar fáil ar na dréacht-Phleananna um Bainistiú Priacal Tuile ar a ndiscréid féin amháin. The draft Flood Risk Management Plans are intended for the purpose of consultation only. They should not be used or relied upon for any other purpose or decision-making process. They are likely to be updated, refined or changed before finalisation. The Commissioners of Public Works in Ireland reserve the right to change the content and/or presentation of any of the information provided in the draft Flood Risk Management Plans at their sole discretion. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Office of Public Works (OPW) gratefully acknowledges the assistance, input and provision of data by a large number of organisations towards the implementation of the National CFRAM Programme and the preparation of this Draft Flood Risk Management Plan, including: − RPS Consulting Engineers − WFD Local Authorities Water and Communities Office LAWCO − Cavan County Council − Dún Laoghaire - Rathdown County Council − Dublin City Council − Fingal County Council − Kildare County Council − Louth County Council − Meath County Council − Offaly County Council − South Dublin County Council − Westmeath County Council − Wexford County Council − Wicklow county Council − Mid-East Regional Authority − Dublin and Mid-Eastern Regional Authority − The Environmental Protection Agency − Met Éireann − All members of the National CFRAM Steering and Stakeholder Groups Maps in the Draft FRMP include Ordnance Survey of Ireland (OSI) data reproduced under licence. Eastern CFRAM Study – UoM10 SEA Environmental Report TABLE OF CONTENTS NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ I 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 1 2 FLOOD RISK IN IRELAND ........................................................................................................ 2 2.1 THE FLOODS DIRECTIVE ................................................................................................... 2 2.2 FLOODS DIRECTIVE APPLICATION IN IRELAND .................................................................... 2 2.3 THE EASTERN CFRAM STUDY ........................................................................................... 3 2.4 UOM10 ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.4.1 Parallel Projects ............................................................................................................ 7 3 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .................................................................... 8 3.1 RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY ................................................................................................ 9 3.2 STUDY TEAM ................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 SCREENING FOR SEA .................................................................................................... 10 3.4 SCOPING FOR SEA ........................................................................................................ 11 3.4.1 Statutory Consultees for SEA ......................................................................................11 3.5 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................... 12 4 METHODOLOGY AND CONSULTATIONS ............................................................................ 13 4.1 PRELIMINARY SCREENING OF FRM METHODS ................................................................. 14 4.2 MULTI -CRITERIA ANALYIS OF FRM OPTIONS ................................................................... 16 4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF PREFERRED OPTIONS ................................................ 17 4.4 PLAN AND SEA OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................... 18 4.4.1 Development of Strategic Environmental Objectives ...................................................18 4.5 GUIDANCE ..................................................................................................................... 22 4.6 DIFFICULTIES AND DATA GAPS ....................................................................................... 22 4.7 CONSULTATIONS ............................................................................................................ 22 4.7.1 Scoping Consultations .................................................................................................22 4.7.2 Transboundary Consultations ......................................................................................23 4.7.3 Proposed Consultation on Draft Plan and Environmental Report ................................23 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLAN ................................................................................................ 24 5.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 24 5.2 UOM10 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN ...................................................................... 24 5.3 GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE ..................................................................................................... 26 5.4 TEMPORAL SCOPE ......................................................................................................... 27 6 BASELINE AND RELEVANT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ................................................... 28 6.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 28 6.2 BIODIVERSITY , FLORA & FAUNA ...................................................................................... 28 6.3 POPULATION & HUMAN HEALTH ...................................................................................... 35 6.4 GEOLOGY , SOILS & LANDUSE ......................................................................................... 37 6.5 WATER .......................................................................................................................... 42 IBE0600Rp0043 I Rev D01 Eastern CFRAM Study – UoM10 SEA Environmental Report 6.6 AIR ............................................................................................................................... 48 6.7 CLIMATE ........................................................................................................................ 48 6.8 MATERIAL ASSETS ......................................................................................................... 50 6.9 CULTURAL , ARCHAEOLOGICAL & ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE ........................................... 52 6.10 LANDSCAPE & VISUAL AMENITY ...................................................................................... 53 6.11 FISHERIES , AQUACULTURE & ANGLING ........................................................................... 55 6.12 AMENITY , COMMUNITY AND SOCIO -ECONOMICS .............................................................. 58 6.13 EVOLUTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE ABSENCE OF THE PLAN .................................... 61 7 REVIEW OF RELEVANT, PLANS, PROGRAMMES AND POLICIES ................................... 64 7.1 INTERACTION WITH OTHER RELEVANT PLANS AND PROGRAMMES ..................................... 64 8 PROPOSED OPTIONS / ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................. 67 8.1 INTRODUCTION TO PROPOSED OPTIONS / ALTERNATIVES ................................................
Recommended publications
  • Wicklow Mountains SAC (Site Code 002122) Conservation Objectives Supporting Document - Blanket Bogs and Associated Habitats

    Wicklow Mountains SAC (Site Code 002122) Conservation Objectives Supporting Document - Blanket Bogs and Associated Habitats

    Wicklow Mountains SAC (site code 002122) Conservation objectives supporting document - blanket bogs and associated habitats NPWS Version 1 July 2017 Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Wicklow Mountains SAC..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Mapping methodology ....................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Potential for habitat restoration ......................................................................................... 3 2 Conservation objectives ............................................................................................................. 3 3 Area ........................................................................................................................................... 4 4 Range ........................................................................................................................................ 5 5 Structure and functions ............................................................................................................. 5 5.1 Ecosystem function ............................................................................................................ 6 5.1.1 Ecosystem function: soil nutrients .............................................................................. 6 5.1.2 Ecosystem function: peat formation
  • 12 Archaeology, Architectural and Cultural Heritage

    12 Archaeology, Architectural and Cultural Heritage

    Irish Water Arklow Wastewater Treatment Plant Project EIA Report 12 Archaeology, Architectural and Cultural Heritage 12.1 Introduction This chapter describes the likely significant effects of the proposed development on archaeology, architectural and cultural heritage. Chapter 4 provides a full description of the proposed development whilst Chapter 5 describes the Construction Strategy. The following aspects are particularly relevant to the archaeology, architectural and cultural heritage assessment: • Design: • Likely significant effects of the proposed development on architectural heritage and setting; and • Likelihood of encountering archaeological remains associated with the footprint of the proposed development. • Operation: • Likely significant effects of the proposed development on architectural heritage and setting during operation. • Construction: • Likelihood of encountering archaeological remains during intrusive works including subsurface construction and open cut construction of the outfalls and interceptor sewers; and • Underpinning works to Arklow Bridge. It should be noted that this assessment has had regard to the ongoing data gathering and assessment of the archaeology, architectural and cultural heritage as part of the proposed Arklow Flood Relief Scheme. This work is currently being carried out by Courtney Deery and ADCO on behalf of the Office of Public Works and Wicklow County Council. As such, references to this ongoing assessment are made, where relevant, within this assessment chapter. 12.2 Assessment Methodology 12.2.1 General This assessment determines, as far as reasonably possible from existing records, the nature of the cultural heritage resource within the footprint and a defined vicinity of the proposed development using appropriate methods of study. 247825/EIA/EIAR/1 | Issue | September 2018 | Arup Ch 12 - Page 1 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\DUBLIN\JOBS\247000\247825-00\4.
  • RESTRICTED Report No

    RESTRICTED Report No

    -0,AJ1o ~~ F7 p RESTRICTED Report No. PU-5a Public Disclosure Authorized This report was prepared for use within the Bank and its affiliated organizations. They do not accept responsibility for its accuracy or completeness. The report may not be published nor may it be quoted as representing their views. INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION Public Disclosure Authorized IRELAND ELECTRICITY SUPPLY BOARD APPRAISAL OF THE PUMPED STORAGE POWER PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized February 7, 1969 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Utilities Projects Department CURRENCY EQUIVAIENTS Irish £l US$2.40 US$1 = £ -/8/4 1 Shilling(s) US$0.12 1 Penny (d) = one US cent (US$0.01) ESB's fiscal year ends March 31 W3EJHTS AND MEASURES EQUIVALENTS One kilometer (km) n 0.622 miles One megawatt (NW) - 1,000 kilowatts One gigawatt hour (GWh) - One million kilowatt hours (kWh) One kilovolt (kV) - 1,000 volts One mega-voltampere (MVA) - 1,000 kilovoltanperes (kVa) ACRONYN AND ABBREVIATIDNS "ESB" or "Board" - Electricity Supply Board nERIn - Economic Research Institute, (now the Econaoic and Social Research Institute), Dublin tcjEn - Cdras Iompafr Eireann (Irish Transport Co.) IRELAND ELECTRICITY SUPPLY BOARD TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUHiA1f i 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. ENERGY USE IN IRELAND 2 Turf 2 The Power Sector 3 Interconnection 4 Rural Electrification 5 Tariff Structure 5 3. THE ESB PROGRAhU 6 4. THE PROJECT 8 Status of Engineering and Procurement 8 Construction Schedule 9 Cost Estimate 9 Disbursements 10 Operating Cost 10 5. JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT 10 Load Forecasts 10 Required Generating Capacity 11 Size of the Project 11 Alternatives 12 6.
  • Race Booklet Date: 22Nd AUGUST 2020

    Race Booklet Date: 22Nd AUGUST 2020

    Race Booklet Date: 22nd AUGUST 2020 (last updated 11.08.2020) 1 Table of Contents Race Outline .................................................................................................................................. 3 Race Entry ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Race Day Itinerary ......................................................................................................................... 4 Race Location & Parking ............................................................................................................... 5 Race-Day Registration …………………............................................................................................... 6 Facilities at Start / Finish Line (Fenton’s Bar) ............................................................................... 7 Littering .........................................................................................................................................7 Withdrawal from the Race ........................................................................................................... 7 Important Contact Details ............................................................................................................ 8 Mandatory & Recommended Kit/Equipment .............................................................................. 8 Prize Giving...………………………………...............................................................................................
  • EIS Chapter 4

    EIS Chapter 4

    ECOLOGY 4 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 Background ............................................................................................................. 1 Location and Setting ................................................................................................ 1 Purpose of the Ecological Impact Assessment ........................................................ 1 LEGISLATIVE and POLICY CONTEXT ...................................................................... 2 Legislative Context .................................................................................................. 2 Planning Policies ..................................................................................................... 3 Biodiversity Plans .................................................................................................... 5 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 5 Area of Study ........................................................................................................... 6 Desk-based Study ................................................................................................... 6 Field Survey ............................................................................................................ 6 Constraints and Uncertainty of Data ........................................................................ 7 Assessment
  • Wicklow Future Forest Woodland Green Infrastructure of Wicklow

    Wicklow Future Forest Woodland Green Infrastructure of Wicklow

    WICKLOW FUTURE FOREST WOODLAND GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE OF WICKLOW SIQI TAN 2021 DRAFT MASTER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL THESIS-2020/2021 UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN CONTENTS 1. WICKLOW OVERVIEW 4 2. RIVERS AND WOODLANDS 28 3. WOODLAND MANAGEMENT 56 4. WICKLOW LANDUSE 60 PROGRAMME MTARC001 - MASTER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MODULE LARC40450-LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL THESIS 2020-2021 FINAL REPORT 5. DEVELOPING NEW WOODLAND X TUTOR MS SOPHIA MEERES AUTHOR 6. CONCLUSIONS X SIQI TAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GRADUATE STUDENT STUDENT №: 17211085 TELEPHONE +353 830668339 7. REFERENCES 70 E-MAIL [email protected] 1. WICKLOW OVERVIEW Map 1.1 Wicklow and Municipal District Dublin Map 1.2 Wicklow Main towns and Townland Bray 6.5 km² POP.: 32,600 Kildare Bray 123.9 km² Greystones Greystones 64.9 km² 4.2 km² POP.: 18,140 Wicklow 433.4 km² Co. Wicklow Wicklow 2025 km² 31.6 km² Baltinglass Population: 142,425 POP.: 10,584 915.1 km² Arklow 486.7 km² Carlow Arklow 6.2 km² POP.: 13,163 County Wicklow is adjacent to County Dublin, Kildare, Carlow and Wexford. There are 1356 townlands in Wicklow. The total area of Wicklow is 2025 km², with the pop- Townlands are the smallest land divisions in Ire- Wexford ulation of 142,425 (2016 Census). land. Many Townlands are of very old origin and 4 they developed in various ways – from ancient 5 Nowadays, Wicklow is divided by five municipal clan lands, lands attached to Norman manors or districts. Plantation divisions. GIS data source: OSI GIS data source: OSI 1.1 WICKLOW LIFE Map 1.3 Wicklow Roads and Buildings Map 1.4 Housing and Rivers Bray Bray Greystones Greystones Wicklow Wicklow Arklow Arklow Roads of all levels are very dense in the towns, with fewer main roads in the suburbs and only a A great number of housings along rivers and lakes few national roads in the mountains.
  • River Dargle Valley

    River Dargle Valley

    WICKLOW - COUNTY GEOLOGICAL SITE REPORT NAME OF SITE River Dargle Valley Other names used for site Dargle Gorge, Lover’s Leap IGH THEME IGH7 Quaternary, IGH14 Fluvial\Lacustrine Geomorphology TOWNLAND(S) Tinnehinch, Cookstown, Kilcroney, Newtown NEAREST TOWN/VILLAGE Enniskerry SIX INCH MAP NUMBER 7 ITM CO-ORDINATES 723380E 716400N (centre of feature) 1:50,000 O.S. SHEET NUMBER 56 GSI BEDROCK 1:100,000 SHEET NO. 16 Outline Site Description A stretch of the River Dargle meandering from a wide and flat valley into cascades in a deep, steep-sided rocky gorge. Geological System/Age and Primary Rock Type The River Dargle gorge is a Quaternary feature, formed during deglaciation towards the end of the last glaciation (after 22,000 years ago). The river course flows over glaciofluvial drift, underlain by Ordovician slates (from Tinnehinch Bridge to gorge) into a rocky gorge cut into Cambrian quartzite and greywacke bedrock (from the gorge to Dargle Bridge near the N11). Main Geological or Geomorphological Interest The River Dargle gorge is one of several spectacular subglacial meltwater channels cut into solid bedrock in north Wicklow (see also Glen of the Downs, the Scalp, Glencullen River). This deeply incised landscape feature was formed when high pressure waters, flowing at the base of the overlying ice sheet, cut into and eroded solid bedrock. The gorge is up to 60m deep below Lovers Leap. The Dargle River rises in granite uplands between War Hill (686m) and Tonduff North (642m) and flows 3km eastwards to Powerscourt Waterfall (120m high), where it descends to the floor of a wide and flat valley (between Maulin and Great Sugar Loaf).
  • Irish Landscape Names

    Irish Landscape Names

    Irish Landscape Names Preface to 2010 edition Stradbally on its own denotes a parish and village); there is usually no equivalent word in the Irish form, such as sliabh or cnoc; and the Ordnance The following document is extracted from the database used to prepare the list Survey forms have not gained currency locally or amongst hill-walkers. The of peaks included on the „Summits‟ section and other sections at second group of exceptions concerns hills for which there was substantial www.mountainviews.ie The document comprises the name data and key evidence from alternative authoritative sources for a name other than the one geographical data for each peak listed on the website as of May 2010, with shown on OS maps, e.g. Croaghonagh / Cruach Eoghanach in Co. Donegal, some minor changes and omissions. The geographical data on the website is marked on the Discovery map as Barnesmore, or Slievetrue in Co. Antrim, more comprehensive. marked on the Discoverer map as Carn Hill. In some of these cases, the evidence for overriding the map forms comes from other Ordnance Survey The data was collated over a number of years by a team of volunteer sources, such as the Ordnance Survey Memoirs. It should be emphasised that contributors to the website. The list in use started with the 2000ft list of Rev. these exceptions represent only a very small percentage of the names listed Vandeleur (1950s), the 600m list based on this by Joss Lynam (1970s) and the and that the forms used by the Placenames Branch and/or OSI/OSNI are 400 and 500m lists of Michael Dewey and Myrddyn Phillips.
  • 2016 – 2022 Record of Protected Structures

    2016 – 2022 Record of Protected Structures

    COUNTY Record of Protected Structures 2016 – 2022 WICKLOW COUNTY DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comhairle Contae Chill Mhantáin DECEMBER 2016 Wicklow County Council - Record of Protected Structures Each development plan must include policy objectives to protect structures or parts of structures of special interest within its functional area under Section 10 of the Planning and Development Act, 2000. The primary means of achieving this objective is for the planning authority to compile and maintain a record of protected structures to be included in the development plan. A planning authority is obliged to include in the Record of Protected Structures every structure which, in its opinion, is of special architectural, historical, archaeological, artistic, cultural, scientific, social or technical interest. A ‘protected structure’ is defined as any structure or specified part of a structure, which is included in the Record of Protected Structures. A structure is defined by the Planning and Development Act, 2000 as ‘any building, structure, excavation, or other thing constructed or made on, in or under any land, or any part of a structure’. In relation to a protected structure, the meaning of the term ‘structure’ is expanded to include: (a) the interior of the structure; (b) the land lying within the curtilage of the structure; (c) any other structures lying within that curtilage and their interiors, and (d) all fixtures and features which form part of the interior or exterior of the above structures. Where indicated in the Record of Protected Structures, protection may also include any specified feature within the attendant grounds of the structure which would not otherwise be included.
  • Treetops Daycare & Afterschool Club Sea

    Treetops Daycare & Afterschool Club Sea

    KILCOOLE EXPO 2017 The Committee of the Kilcoole Community Centre would like to welcome everyone to the Kilcoole Business Expo 2017. We are delighted to be in a position to provide a forum, once again, for our local businesses to showcase their goods and services. Hopefully, heightened awareness of the great variety of commerce in our community, will encourage more of us to “think local” and look to our neighbourhood businesses first. Spending locally in the community creates local wealth, local jobs and studies show that money spent in the community has a multiplier effect throughout the local economy. Please take the time to visit all of the displays and review the adverts in the booklet. We’re sure there are services and offers of interest to everyone. The Committee, would also like to remind everyone that rooms are available for rent for a variety of functions, clubs, classes etc. CONTACT US Contact details are available on our Kilcoole Community Centre Facebook page or by sending an email to [email protected]. We also have launched our new website page www.kilcoole.ie How can we help you? Local Employment Service to help you get a job Enterprise service to help you set up your own business Free courses and workshops Family support projects Upcoming free courses: Cook Eat Share Healthy Cooking Fáilte Isteach Conversational English Parenting: adolescents; 6-11 Manual Handling years; parenting when separated Start Your Own Business Safe Pass You have to live in Greater Bray or Greystones areas and meet certain criteria to qualify. Contact us on 01-286 8266 www.brayareapartnership.ie Opening Hours: Mon-Sat.
  • Republic of Ireland (EI)

    Republic of Ireland (EI)

    Summits on the Air – ARM for Republic of Ireland (EI) Summits on the Air Republic of Ireland (EI) Association Reference Manual Issue Number 1.10 Date of Issue 01-Mar-2003 Participation start date 15-Mar-2003 Authorised John Linford G3WGV Date 03-Feb-2003 Association Manager Joe Ryan EI7GY Regional Managers Joe Fadden EI3IX, John Desmond EI7GL, Joe Ryan EI7GY, Tom Rea EI2GP Management Team G0HJQ, G3CWI, G3WGV, M5EVT Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. The source data used in the Marilyn lists herein is copyright of E D Clemens and Dave Hewitt and is used with their permission. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 26 Issue 1.10 Summits on the Air – ARM for Republic of Ireland (EI) Table of contents 1 CHANGE CONTROL.................................................................................................................................3 2 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA......................................................................................................4 2.1 PROGRAMME DERIVATION .....................................................................................................................4 2.2 PURPOSE OF THE SOTA PROGRAMME ...................................................................................................5 2.3 RULES FOR ACTIVATORS .......................................................................................................................5 2.4 RULES FOR
  • Irish Hill and Mountain Names

    Irish Hill and Mountain Names

    Irish Hill and Mountain Names The following document is extracted from the database used to prepare the list where Stradbally on its own denotes a parish and village); there is usually no of peaks included on the „Summits‟ section and other sections at equivalent word in the Irish form, such as sliabh or cnoc; and the Ordnance www.mountainviews.ie The document comprises the name data and key Survey forms have not gained currency locally or amongst hill-walkers. The geographical data for each peak listed on the website as of May 2010, with second group of exceptions concerns hills for which there was substantial some minor changes and omissions. The geographical data on the website is evidence from alternative authoritative sources for a name other than the one more comprehensive. shown on OS maps, e.g. Croaghonagh / Cruach Eoghanach in Co. Donegal, marked on the Discovery map as Barnesmore, or Slievetrue in Co. Antrim, The data was collated over a number of years by a team of volunteer marked on the Discoverer map as Carn Hill. In some of these cases, the contributors to the website. The list in use started with the 2000ft list of Rev. evidence for overriding the map forms comes from other Ordnance Survey Vandeleur (1950s), the 600m list based on this by Joss Lynam (1970s) and the sources, such as the Ordnance Survey Memoirs. It should be emphasised that 400 and 500m lists of Michael Dewey and Myrddyn Phillips. Extensive revision these exceptions represent only a very small percentage of the names listed and extra data has been accepted from many MV contributors including Simon and that the forms used by the Placenames Branch and/or OSI/OSNI are Stewart, Brian Ringland, Paul Donnelly, John FitzGerald, Denise Jacques, Colin adopted here in all other cases.