Agave Chrysantha Peebles and A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agave Chrysantha Peebles and A This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Factors Affecting the Distribution, Pollination Ecology, and Evolution of Agave chrysantha Peebles and A. palmeri Engelm. (Agavaceae) Liz Slauson1 Abstract.-Taxonomy, biogeography and pollination ecology of two closely related taxa of the Madrean Archipelago, Agave chrysantha Peebles and A. palmeri Engelm. are reviewed. Several questions remain regarding the reported obligate mutualism between A. palmeri and an endangered species of bat, Leptonycteris curasorae, and the role bats and other animals may play in the pollination of A. chrysantha. Preliminary evidence suggests that diurnal visitors play an important role in pollination of A. chrysantha and A. palmeri, and bats appear to have a more faculative role in pollination than previously thought. The seasonal, variable and migratory nature of Leptonycteris seems unlikely to support a tight mutualistic relationship with agaves. Plasticity in pollinator species may be most adaptive in agaves with large geographic ranges (A. palmen) and variable habitats (A. chrysantha). "Bat-adapted" traits may be just as advantageous to insects and other animals in hot and arid climates where peak activity is near dawn and dusk. INTRODUCTION morphology was often grossly altered due to the unnatural conditions of cultivation in green­ Agaves are perennial leaf succulents consist­ houses of Europe, and as a result, most taxa ing of a basal rosette where water and described during this era are unrecognizable by carbohydrates are stored. Plants are monocarpic; their written descriptions alone (Gentry 1982). Al­ they require 10-50 years to reach maturity, then though botanists became more familiar with the initiate an'inflorescence, flower and die. Although genus during the early 1900's, they rarely ob­ the genus Agave (Agavaceae) is an important served agaves in habitat and failed to realize the vegetation component in the biotic communities large degree of leaf variability that can exist both of the Madrean Archipelago, reproductive, eco­ within and between populations. Floral characters logical and speciation processes are poorly were largely ignored, and the concentration on understood. Taxonomic problems have long con­ vegetative differences resulted in a large degree of tributed to a large degree of confusion. During the taxonomic "splitting" at the species level (Gentry early to mid-nineteenth century, agaves from the 1982). Other factors contributed to a poor under­ New World were imported to Europe as ornamen­ standing of agaves as well, Few botanists have tal novelties. Early taxonomists in Europe collected specimens due to the presence of teeth, attempting to name these cultivated species gen­ spines, caustic juices, and the difficulty in process­ erally had no information regarding their origin, ing specimens. Consequently, few specimens of provided no preserved or type specimens, no il­ each taxon have been available for study, many of lustrations, and used vegetative rather than which were poorly prepared and lacked floral or reproductive characters to diagnose species. Leaf other taxonomically significant characteristics. Numerous populations exist in rugged and inac­ cessible terrain which has resulted in limited 1Desert Botanical Garden, 1201 N. Galvin Parkway, Phoenix, AZ distributional data. The long time span required 85008. by members of this genus to reach reproductive 194 maturity makes ex-situ reproductive biology stud­ flowers with red to brownish tepal apices of A. ies or rapid evaluation of offspring difficult palmen), 4} more congested umbels, 5} shorter (Gentry 1982). Thus, large gaps in knowledge ex­ panicles, 6} broader and shorter lanceolate leaves ist with respect to ecology, reproductive biology, with large teeth, and 7} undulate to repand leaf cytology and genetics. margins (Gentry 1982). Agave chrysantha has been Gentry's (1982) more recent and comprehen­ recognized as a subspecies of A. palmeri (Little sive monograph of Agave emphasized 1943) and as a distinct species (Gentry 1982). Gentry comparative morphology, particularly with re­ (1982) has suggested that A. chrysantha may be a gard to floral characters. Species comprehension geologically young species which has not yet was greatly enhanced by his understanding of reached a stabilized or isolated condition, possibly morphological variability of populations and eco­ originating "through introgression with A. palmeri types, reproductive biology, introgression, andA. parryi." Alternatively, A. chrysantha may hybridization and polyploidy. Both polyploidy represent the northern end of a cline of A. palmeri and hybridization are common in Agave (x = 30), that has developed by primary or secondary inter­ and appear to be important mechanisms in the gradation with A. palmeri. evolution of the genus (Pinkava and Baker 1985). The pollination ecology of the Ditepalae is of This trend towards reticulate evolution appears to interest as several recent studies have suggested be due to a lack of complete reproductive isola­ that bats of the genus Leptonycteris are obligate tion between taxa recognized at the species level pollinators of A. palmeri (Howell 1979, Schaffer (Gentry 1967, Burgess 1979, 1985). The climatic and Schaffer 1979, Howell and Roth 1981). Howell fluctuations in the southwestern U.S. during the and Roth (1981) proposed that reported declines glacial-interglacial cycle of the Pleistocene may in Leptonycteris popUlations could potentially se­ have resulted in repeated periods of range expan­ verely impact sexual reproduction in paniculate sion and genetic interchange between species, agaves. This hypothesis was based on a decline in followed by periods of range contraction and iso­ seed set of herbarium specimens over a 30 year lation in small, disjunct populations (Burgess period and low fruit and seed set (approximately 1985). This repeated contact may have been suffi­ 25% and 20% respectively) in A. palmeri popUla­ cient to prevent development of reproductive tions where bats were absent. Fruit and seed set barriers. were high (81% and 700/0) where bats were pre­ The genus Agave is generally thought to have sent. No data were presented documenting visitor evolved in the mesic habitats of central" Mexico or visitation rates. Sutherland (1982, 1987) has (Gomez Pompa 1963), however, many species documented that mean fruit set for paniculate have successfully radiated northward into the agaves is generally low (20-25%), however, fruit more arid environments of northern Mexico and and seed set may be highly variable between the southwestern United States. The Group branches. The high fruit set reported by Howell Ditepalae within the genus Agave is composed of and Roth in bat-pollinated popUlations may be a 13 taxa primarily centered in the Sierra Madre Oc­ result of inadequate sample size, while the "low" cidental of Mexico, but two closely related results may be more representative of normal fruit members of this group, A. chrysantha Peebles and set. Cockrum and Petryszyn (1991) have ques­ A. palmeri Engelm., extend into central and tioned reported declines in Leptonycteris southern Arizona respectively, representing the numbers based on the fact that few observers northernmost distribution of the group. Agave have understood the variability and seasonality of palmeri occupies grama grasslands and oak Leptonycteris movement in the northern part of woodlands of northern Mexico and southern por­ its range (resulting in reports of absent, declining tions of Arizona and New Mexico, whereas Agave and low popUlation numbers). Herbarium speci­ chrysantha is found in desertscrub, chaparral, ju­ mens cited by Howell and Roth were reviewed by niper woodland and the fringes of pine-oak Cockrum and Petryszyn who obtained different woodland communities of central and southern estimates of fruit and seed set. They also noted Arizona. Both species may be found on granitic, that specimens cited by Howell and Roth were volcanic and limestone mountain slopes. Agave from localities which were either near the edge or chrysantha appears to be the nearest relative of A. beyond the known range of Leptonycteris. palmeri based on floral and other morphological Gentry (1982) postulated that other members characteristics, and differs from A. palmeri by 1) of the Ditepalae may have mutualistic associa­ its smaller flower size, 2) shallower tube, 3) clear tions with nectar-feeding bats due to their similar yellow perianth (versus the pale greenish-yellow flower structure. He proposed that a "wave of 195 nectar flow" exists from spring to winter, pro­ tance. Nectar production in bat-pollinated species viding food for bats as they migrate south. such as A. palmeri is nocturnal with peak pro­ Starting in the south with the March bloom of A. duction from 2000-2200 hours (Howell 1979). colorata in Sonora, this "nectar flow" moves Pollen protein content of bat-pollina'ted agaves north to Arizona for the summer with the flow­ tends to be high (44% in A. palmerl) while nec­ ering of A. palmeri, then extends south through tar sugar concentration is relatively low the Sierra Madre Occidental via A. shrevei in (11-20%) (Howell 1972). Bee-pollinated species southern Sonora, to A. durangensis in Chihua­ generally exhibit the opposite trend. Pollen pro­ hua, and finally to A. wocomahiin Durango and tein content is generally low (8-16%) (Howell Zacatecas which bloom into December. Arita 1972),
Recommended publications
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Patagonia Mountains and Adjoining Areas, Santa Cruz County, Arizona
    Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Patagonia Mountains and Adjoining Areas, Santa Cruz County, Arizona GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 658-E Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Patagonia Mountains and Adjoining Areas, Santa Cruz County, Arizona By FRANK S. SIMONS MESOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY IN SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 658-E Descriptive stratigraphy of Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous rocks that are mainly rhyolites but that include some sedimentary rocks and intermediate volcanic rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS G. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 40 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1205 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract El Cretaceous rocks . E13 Introduction 1 Bisbee Formation . .. 13 Triassic and Jurassic rocks... ... ... ... 2 Fossils and age. _....... 16 Canelo Hills Volcanics. ... ... 2 Volcanic rocks of lower Alum Gulch 16 Triassic or Jurassic rocks ._- . 3 Volcanic rocks of Dove Canyon.. 17 Volcanic rocks in the southern Patagonia Trachyandesite of Meadow Valley 18 Mountains ... __ __ . .... 3 Tuff and shale.... ... ..... 18 UX Ranch block . 3 Thin lava flows 19 Duquesne block.........._ ..... .. ...... 3 Thick lava flows 20 Corral Canyon block..... _ . .. 6 Chemical composition 20 Volcaniclastic sequence . .._ . 6 Alteration of trachyandesitic lavas. ... 20 Volcanic sequence.. .._. 7 Age .. - - 21 American Mine block. .._ 8 Cretaceous or Tertiary rocks ... ......... 21 Thunder Mine block _ 9 Volcanic rocks of the Humboldt Chemical composition... ....... ....... 9 mine-Trench Camp area ... ... 21 Age and correlation.. 10 Volcanic rocks of Red Mountain 22 Volcanic and sedimentary rocks References cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Granite Peak Stock Area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona
    Geology of the Granite Peak stock area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors DeRuyter, Vernon Donald Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 05:09:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555132 GEOLOGY OF THE GRANITE PEAK STOCK AREA, WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS, COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA by Vernon Donald DeRuyter A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 9 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of require­ ments for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Re­ quests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major de­ partment or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the pro­ posed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Geologic Structures Between Lordsburg, New Mexico, and Tucson, Arizona Harald D
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/29 Major geologic structures between Lordsburg, New Mexico, and Tucson, Arizona Harald D. Drewes and C. H. Thorman, 1978, pp. 291-295 in: Land of Cochise (Southeastern Arizona), Callender, J. F.; Wilt, J.; Clemons, R. E.; James, H. L.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 29th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 348 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1978 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of the Sky Islands: Exhibit Development Resource Guide for Biology and Geology at Chiricahua National Monument and Coronado National Memorial
    Stories of the Sky Islands: Exhibit Development Resource Guide for Biology and Geology at Chiricahua National Monument and Coronado National Memorial Prepared for the National Park Service under terms of Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement H1200-05-0003 Task Agreement J8680090020 Prepared by Adam M. Hudson,1 J. Jesse Minor,2,3 Erin E. Posthumus4 In cooperation with the Arizona State Museum The University of Arizona Tucson, AZ Beth Grindell, Principal Investigator May 17, 2013 1: Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona ([email protected]) 2: School of Geography and Development, University of Arizona ([email protected]) 3: Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona 4: School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona ([email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................3 Beth Grindell, Ph.D. Ch. 1: Current research and information for exhibit development on the geology of Chiricahua National Monument and Coronado National Memorial, Southeast Arizona, USA..................................................................................................................................... 5 Adam M. Hudson, M.S. Section 1: Geologic Time and the Geologic Time Scale ..................................................5 Section 2: Plate Tectonic Evolution and Geologic History of Southeast Arizona .........11 Section 3: Park-specific Geologic History – Chiricahua
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Mineralization in the Guindani Canyon Area of the Northern Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona
    Uranium mineralization in the Guindani Canyon area of the northern Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona by Russell M. Corn, Richard Ahern, and Jon Spencer Arizona Geological Survey Contributed Report CR-08-B version 1.0 June 2008 21 page text Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Arizona Geological Survey. 1 Arizona Geological Survey Contributed Report CR-08-B Proposed Mineral Withdrawal, Guindani Basin Area Northern Whetstone Mts., Cochise County, AZ Russell M. Corn (Registered Geologist) ______________________________________ The Coronado National Forest proposed a mineral withdrawal of approximately 2,600 acres covering all of the Guindani Basin drainage as shown on the attached copy of a topographic map. The proposed withdrawal includes virtually all of the Northern Whetstone Mining District, an area with numerous old small mines, prospects, known occurrences and past production of uranium, tungsten, fluorite and silica. It also includes the entire surface exposures of unusual alaskitic altered granite that contains disseminated fluorite and uranium minerals. Attached are copies of gamma logs and uranium assay logs fro three drill holes in the alaskite and a copy of a summary of Rocky Mountain Energy’s drilling results for uranium in shear and fracture zones on claims north of the alaskite exposures. The uranium exploration effort was carried out between 1973 and 1976 and the effort was terminated when the bottom dropped out of the uranium market.
    [Show full text]
  • Geodatabase of Post-Wildfire Study
    Geodatabase of Post-Wildfire Study Basins Assessing the predictive strengths of post-wildfire debris-flow models in Arizona and defining rainfall intensity-duration thresholds for initiation of post-fire debris flow Ann Youberg DIGITAL INFORMATION DI-44 July 2015 Arizona Geological Survey www.azgs.az.gov | repository.azgs.az.gov Arizona Geological Survey M. Lee Allison, State Geologist and Director Manuscript approved for publication in July 2015 Printed by the Arizona Geological Survey All rights reserved For an electronic copy of this publication: www.repository.azgs.az.gov Printed copies are on sale at the Arizona Experience Store 416 W. Congress, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520.770.3500) For information on the mission, objectives or geologic products of the Arizona Geological Survey visit www.azgs.az.gov. This publication was prepared by an agency of the State of Arizona. The State of Arizona, or any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the State of Arizona. ___________________________ Suggested Citation: Youberg A., 2015, Geodatabase of Post-Wildfire Study Basins: Assessing the predictive strengths of post-wildfire debris-flow models inArizona, and defining rainfall intensity-duration thresholds for
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation of Volcanic Rocks in Santa Cruz County, Arizona
    87 CORRELATION OF VOLCANIC ROCKS IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, ARIZONA By Otner J. Taylor A study of the volcanic rocks in Santa Cruz County, Arizona, has been tnade through cotnpilation of previous work together with new investigations. These cotnpilations indicate that there are tnany sitnilarities of sequence and structure in the volcanic rocks of the Atascosa Mountains, Tutnacacori Mountains, Santa Rita Mountains, Patagonia Mountains, and Mustang Mountains of Santa Cruz County. The volcanic rocks of the Tucson Mountains to the north of Pitna County also show sitnilarities to the volcanic rocks in the ranges of Santa Cruz County. Previous studies were tnade in the Atascosa and Tutnacacori Mountains by Webb and Coryell (1954). The regional geology of the Santa Rita and Patagonia Mountains was tnapped by Schraeder (1915) although tnany localized studies have since been tnade by various authors. The geology of the Mustang Mountains was tnapped by Bryant (1951). The Tucson Mountains have been studied principally by Brown (1939) and Kinnison (1958). A stratigraphic colutnn of the volcanic rocks of each range has been construc­ ted. These colutnns are shown on Plate 1. The generalized sequence in each case is: Cretaceous (?) andesite and rhyolite; Tertiary andesite, rhyolite, tuff, rhyolite-latite, and andesite; and Quaternary (?) basalt. The rocks were dated by using the principle of superposition as well as the following hypotheses: the rocks thought to be Cretaceous also are badly faulted and tilted and a pre-Laratnide age is suggested; the rocks thought to be Tertiary are thick and only gently tilted so that a post-Laratnide age is suggested; the upper andesites of this Tertiary sequence are not tilted, and they are probably post-Lower Miocene since they have structural and sequential sitnilarities with the andesites associated with the Lower Miocene Minetta beds and their probable equivalent, the Pantano fortnation; the rocks thought to be Quaternary are rela­ tively undisturbed and they overlie gravels and lake beds thought to be late Pliocene and Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis and Dissertation Index of Arizona Geology to December 1979
    Arizona Geological Society Digest, Volume XII, 1980 261 Thesis and Dissertation Index of Arizona Geology to December 1979 From The University of Arizona, Arizona State University, and Northern Arizona University compiled by 1 Gregory R. Wessel Introduction This list is a compilation of all graduate theses and dissertations completed at The University of Arizona, Arizona State University, and Northern Arizona University concerning the geology of Arizona. The list is complete through December 1979. To facilitate the use of this list as a reference, papers are arranged alphabetically into five sec­ tions on the basis of study area. Four sections cover the four quadrants of the state of Arizona us­ ing the Gila and Salt River Meridian and Base Line (Fig. 1), and the fifth section contains theses that pertain to the entire state. A thesis or dissertation that includes work in two quadrants is listed under both sections. Those covering subjects or areas outside of the geology of Arizona are omitted. This list was compiled from tabulations of geology theses graciously supplied by each university. Although care was taken to include all theses, some may have been inadvertently overlooked. It is hoped that readers will report any omissions so they may be included in Digest XIII. Digest XIII will contain an update of work 114 113 112 III 110 I 9 completed at Arizona universities, as well as a 37 list of theses and dissertations on Arizona geol­ ogy completed at universities outside of the state. Grateful acknowledgment is made of the assist­ 36 ance of Tom L. Heidrick, who inspired the pro- N£ ject and who, with Joe Wilkins, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • FACT SHEET Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Cienega Creek Basin: a 2000-2001 Baseline Study – November 2012
    FACT SHEET Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Cienega Creek Basin: A 2000-2001 Baseline Study – November 2012 INTRODUCTION A baseline groundwater quality study of the Cienega Creek basin was conducted in 2000-2001 by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) Ambient Groundwater Monitoring Program. ADEQ conducted this monitoring pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes §49-225 that mandates ongoing monitoring of waters of the state including its aquifers. The fact sheet is a synopsis of the ADEQ Open File Report 12-02.1 The Cienega Creek groundwater basin includes approximately 606 square miles in southeastern Arizona within Cochise, Pima, and Santa Cruz counties (Map 1).2 The Cienega Creek basin is a narrow, northwest-trending alluvial valley surrounded by fault-block mountains with- in the basin and range physiographic province. The basin is bounded on the west by the Santa Rita and Empire Mountains, on the north by the Rincon Mountains, on the east by the Whetstone and Mustang Mountains, and on the south by the Canelo Hills and Patagonia Mountains. In 2000, the basin had a population of 4,355 which includes the town of Patagonia and the community of Sonoita.2 The basin predominantly consists of federal land (53 percent) including the Coronado National Forest managed by the Forest Service (41 percent) and the Las Cienegas National Conservation Area administered by the Bureau of Land Management (12 percent). State Trust Figure 1 - Windmills are a popular method of pumping ground- lands (24 percent) and private holdings (23 percent) water in the Cienega Creek basin. This well is located near the constitute the remainder of the basin.2 town of Sonoita in grasslands made verdant by monsoon precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Depositional History of Southeastern Arizona Philip T
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/29 Mesozoic depositional history of southeastern Arizona Philip T. Hayes and Harold Drewes, 1978, pp. 201-207 in: Land of Cochise (Southeastern Arizona), Callender, J. F.; Wilt, J.; Clemons, R. E.; James, H. L.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 29th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 348 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1978 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(S): T
    Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(s): T. H. Kearney Source: Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Oct., 1964), pp. 94-103 Published by: Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40022366 Accessed: 21/05/2010 20:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=anas. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. http://www.jstor.org ARIZONA LOCALITIESOF INTEREST TO BOTANISTS Compiled by T.
    [Show full text]