Minami-Sanriku Panorama 23 Mar Minami-Sanriku Panorama 21 Sep

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Minami-Sanriku Panorama 23 Mar Minami-Sanriku Panorama 21 Sep International Recovery Platform Recoveryyg Planning Process & Related Case Studies of the Great East Japan Earthquake 200611.12.16 Yasuo Kawawaki International Reco v ery Platform 1 1.Casualties and Damages As of 12 December 2011 • 15,841 people confirmed dead and 3,490 people missing • 126,,gpy315 buildings completely destructed, approx. 228 thousand buildings half destroyed • 561 square kilometers inundated Dead and Missing • Damages to stock in 7 prefectures People by Cities estimated: 17 trillion JPY (211 billion US$) c.f. Hurricane Katrina 125 billion US$ Kobe earthquake 100 billion US$ 2 Flooded population/Municipal population Fukushima Prefecture Damaged level differs among municipalities Some municipalities are completely destroyed Miyagi Pr ef ectur e Iwate Prefecture 70%~ 50%~70% 30%~50% N 10%~ 30% ~10% Pacific Ocean Source:Population in inundated area - Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (25. April 2011) Total population - Population Census(2010) 3 Population fluctuation by municipality FY2009 Before Decreasing and aging population Centralization to capital city, Sendai Earthquake & 6 months after the disaster Tsunami (1 Mar – 31 Oct 2011) After Rapid decrease in severely damaged town Increase in inland area Source: http://www2.ttcn.ne.jp/honkawa/4364.html Data: Mainichi Shinbun Statistics Bureau, MIC 4 Number of City Office workers dead or missing Many city leaders or managers of disaster response lost their lives, making disaster response impossible in their towns. Dead/ Dead/ Disaster area Workers Disaster area Workers Missing Missing Municipal office building damaged by municipalities total municipalities total workers workers the earthquake and tsunami Iwate Prefecture Miyagi Prefecture(cont.) Total Main Rikuzentakata-C 68 261 Osaki-C 2 700 number of building relocated Ofunato-C 1 357 Watari-T 1 161 municipalities damaged Iwate Prefecture 34 22 2 Kamaishi-C 4 362 Yamamoto-T 4 97 Miyygagi Prefecture 35 32 3 OhiTOtsuchi-T 32 136 Shic higa hama- T 1 110 Fukushima Prefecture 59 36 9 Yamada-T 2 184 Onagawa-T 1 105 Miyagi Prefecture Minamisanriku-T 39 158 Sendai- C 5 9, 446 Fukushima Prefecture Ishinomaki-C 48 848 Soma-C 2 214 (For reference)Municipal officers who died or Kesennuma-C 2 529 Minamisoma-C 4 427 were not found after Hanshin‐Awaji Natori-C 5 316 Namie- T 1 128 Earthquake was 24 in the total Iwanuma-C 4 193 Total of 19 cities 226 14,732 16,550 workers of the most severely damaged C: City, T: Town cities. Note: Numbers of dead/missing workers include temporary staff in some cities. Numbers are based on hearings on 1 Aug 2011, not finalized. Source: Commemorative speech of the opening of Disaster Education Center, University of Hyogo 5 Onagawa Town Coastal Area 22 Mar Onagawa Town Coastal Area 20 Sep Minami-sanriku panorama 23 Mar Minami-sanriku panorama 21 Sep 6 Temporary Onagawa Town Office 20 Sep Temporary houses in athletic park 21 Sep Recovery market (once a month) Fish store, restaurant Kesennuma Port in Minami-sanriku town in Minami-sanriku town 7 2.Recovery Planning Process <Recovery Planning> Disaster Counter Measures Basic Act Basic Act for Reconstruction 【National level】 Basic Guidelines for Prime Minister Reconstruction June - July Central Disaster Management Council Supplementary Budget 【Prefectural level】 Iwate, Miyagi, Fukushima Governor Prefectural Recovery Plan Prefectural Disaster Management Council Aug - Sep 【Municipal level】 Mayors of Cities, Towns and Villages Municipal Recovery Plan Municipal Disaster Management Council Land use plan [Residents level] (relocation, level of dikes) Reconstruction project Municipalities are responsible to first respond to disasters Consensus building Prefectural or Central government support if the scale of among residents the disaster is bigger than the capacities of the municipalities 8 HIrono-Town 9 N Kuji-City Noda-Village Fudai-Village Tanohata-Village Iwaizumi-Town Miyako-City Yamada-Town Otsuchi-Town Iwate Prefecture Kamaishi-City Ofunato-City n Rikuzentakata-City Kesennuma-City i Prefecture plans g y a Minamisanriku-Town y yg Pacific Ocea Mi Ishinomaki-City Higashimatsushima-City Onagawa-Town Rifu-Town Shiogama-City Matsushima-Town Sendai-City Shichigahama-Town Natori-City Iwanuma-City Watari-Town Yamamoto-Town Nov) Shinchi-Town Sep) of of Status of recovery planning (as of November) Soma-City (as (as all all complete at at out Minamisoma-City out Plan Namie-Town mapped mapped Futaba-Town out municipal recover Okuma-Town g gy Tomioka-Town announcement) announcement) Naraha-Town Basic/Guideline completely completely Hirono-Town of municipalities pages on Web Documents online online : plan plan (no (no Iwaki-City decided; Fukushima Prefecture Mappin Source Goals Recovery Recovery Nothing Minami-Sanriku Town Recovery Plan Town Overview ・Pop. 17,431 (2010 National Census) (Approx. 30% over 65 years old) ・Area 164km2 ・Shizugawa Town and Utatsu Town were incorporated into Minami Sanriku Town ・19% oflkltdtfihif people work related to fishing (2005 census) ・Economic strength index 0.31 (within Miyagi Pref, ranking 34 out of 35) Planning Process ・4 town hall meetings, ・4 committee proposals, ・30 residents explanation meetings, ・End of September decision to adopt the plan Organizational Structure for Planning ・operate in temporary city office ・7li7 people in recovery sec tion (support by 3 people from municipalities in Hyogo, Nagasaki Pref, 1 from Miyagi Pref) Source:Home page of Minami Sanriku Town 10 Issue1: Relocation to higher area - ldland use pl an Less damage on higher ground Minami Sanriku Town Shizugawa Area 11 Minami-sanriku town relocation plan to higher ground Counter measures against Maximum level tsunami ・ Evacuation ・ Houses and Public Facilities on high ground (considering night time evacuation, personnel who needs support, ・・) Counter measures against Frequently occurring tsunami ・ Sea walls constructed based on the predictions of future tsunami Before Residence, Industry, Mountain Tourist facilities Sea Future Residence, Industry, Mountain Public facilities Green belt Tourist facilities Sea Evacuate to heights A: Maximum level tsunami More than 10m B: Frequently occurring tsunami 8.7m ※case of Shizugawa area 12 Yuriage district in Natori city Land Use Vision Western residential area elevated Residential Public Park IdtifInundation of Infrastructure flatland area Yuriage district Natori city Piled up rubbles which will be used for embankment 20 Sep 13 Hongo district in Kamaishi city - changes of land use After 1933 Showa-sanriku tsunami After completion of a sea wall villagers relocated to higher places villagers came back to lower places Inundation line New road Houses built before 1960 In 1974, 5-meter Village location before the Showa Sanriku Earthquake Houses built by 1974 sea walls were Village recovery location after the Showa Sanriku Earthquake Houses built by 1999 completed; In 1999 raised to Showa Sanriku Earthquake Tsunami Inundation line Houses built after 2000 11. 8 meters. Source:Map of Hongo district (Nikkei Architecture) 14 Issue2: Recovery projects Minami-Sanriku town recovery projects Main Projects Total project cost ・Land readjustment project for recovery ・160 billion yen ・Group relocation project for disaster risk reduction Budget scale of the town → residential areas relocated to safer ground ・8 billion yen /year ・Residential area ・Residential area ・Residential area ・Parks ・CilCommercial area ・Dike ・Industrial area Source:Home page of Minami Sanriku Town 15 Onagawa town Recovery Projects Main Projects Total project cost ・Land readjustment project for recovery ・~150 billion yen ・Group relocation project for disaster risk reduction Budget scale of the town ・Fishery community environmental improvement project ・6 billion yen/ year → residential area relocated to safer ground ・Residential area ・Public facilities ・Commercial ・Residential area & tourism area (Embankment) ・Memorial Parks (Dike) ・Fishery processing industry area ・Residential area 16 Minami-sanriku fishing villages recovery project A. Separate Relocation Plan B. Collective Relocation Plan C. Combination Relocation Plan 【 Features and challenges 】 【 Features and challenges 】 (Viewpoint of Life) (Viewpoint of Life) ○Live with the people who are familiar ○People from two or more villages live ○Close to the place where victims together were living for a long time ○Possibly far from a place where ○ Close to the fishing port, and easy to victims were living for a long time gggo out fishing ○Possibly far from the fishinggp port (Viewpoint of project feasibility) ○Public service facilities and stores ●Required to secure new lands close to are expected to be built the original village (Viewpoint of project feasibility) ●Required to build meeting places, ●Required to secure larger new lands parks, and so on in each district ●New facilities will be used more efficiently Source:Home page of Minami Sanriku Town ●Development cost will be reduced 17 Issue3: Residents Involvement in the Planning Process MinamiMinami--sanrikusanriku town Recovery Plan Support Miyagi University Disaster recovery planning Disaster recovery planning committee engages academic residents’ committee experts (inputs into recovery plan) (syypjmbol project selection) Community gathering (discussions on community level t own pl anni ng) Town planning meetings at Survey of all residents neighborhoods (detailed discussions on relocation and land compensation) 18 Symbol Project Project scope and main activities 1. Pass on the lessons of tsunami Project • Selected based
Recommended publications
  • Importance of the Inherited Memories of Great Tsunami Disasters in Natural Disaster Reduction
    Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, March 1-4, 2012, Tokyo, Japan IMPORTANCE OF THE INHERITED MEMORIES OF GREAT TSUNAMI DISASTERS IN NATURAL DISASTER REDUCTION Akenori SHIBATA Professor Emeritus, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, [email protected] ABSTRACT: The two gigantic tsunamis, the 869 Jogan tsunami and the 1611 Keicho tsunami, which had attacked the Sendai plain prior to the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake/ tsunami, are reflected. Pioneering works in the historical field by Mr. Y. Iinuma and in the scientific field by Prof. K. Minoura are introduced. To mitigate the damages by natural disaster, the knowledge on the past natural disasters occurred in an area should be properly shared by the people in that area. Necessity of the continued education on disaster reduction in schools and in regional societies is pointed out. Key Words: Great East Japan earthquake, Jogan tsunami, Keicho tsunami, disaster mitigation, disaster education INTRODUCTION The gigantic tsunami caused by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake gave enormous disaster to the wide coastal areas from Aomori Pref. to Ibaragi Pref. on the Pacific Ocean. The damages to Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima Pref. were especially large. The Sanriku ria coast areas in Iwate and in northern Miyagi have been exposed to frequent attack of large tsunamis and the people in those areas have been quite aware of tsunami disasters. On the other hand, the long flat coasts in southern Miyagi and in Fukushima had few experience of large tsunami in these several hundred years, by which reason very few people there had expected the attack of tsunami before the gigantic tsunami of 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Summit Report (English).Pdf
    Introduction The High School Students Summit on “World Tsunami Awareness Day” in Kuroshio was held for two days starting on November 25 of last year in Kuroshio Town, Kochi. It was the first time this type of summit was held in the world, and a total of 739 people, including 361 high school students from 30 countries, Minister in charge of Building National Resilience and Minister of State for Disaster Management, and ambassadors from various countries, participated in the summit. The summit was successfully brought to a close thanks to the support and cooperation of many parties, especially the authorities and organizations involved. In the summit, the participating high school students were organized into three groups, each with a different area of focus, namely “learning about natural disasters,” “preparing for natural disasters,” and “recovering from natural disasters.” Each group made a presentation on the measures that are being implemented in their respective countries. After the presentations, the students engaged in a discussion. The students also participated in a tsunami evacuation drill, which involved evacuating to high ground, and visited a tsunami evacuation tower. Through such activities, the students learned about what the Kochi Prefectural Government and the Kuroshio Municipal Government are doing to prepare for a Nankai Trough earthquake. These activities were followed by an active discussion on issues that were brought up in the presentations concerning the wonderful measures that are being implemented in each country. The discussion resulted in the adoption of the Kuroshio Declaration, which was based on the consensus of the participants. The declaration expressed the determination of the students to do everything in their power to protect the precious lives of as many people as possible from natural disasters, such as a tsunami, while inheriting the responsibility for passing on previous generations’ vision for disaster mitigation and risk reduction to future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • FONTI E DOCUMENTI STORICAMENTE.ORG Laboratorio Di Storia
    St�rica L A B O R A T O R I O D I S T O R I A ALMA MATER STUDIORUM Università di Bologna Dipartimento di Storia Culture Civiltà FONTI E DOCUMENTI STORICAMENTE.ORG Laboratorio di Storia Florian Coulmas 3.11 From one Disaster to another: Japan’s Earthquake Numero 17 - 2021 ISSN: 1825-411X Art. 1 pp. 1-18 DOI: 10.12977/stor819 Editore: BraDypUS Data di pubblicazione: 05/03/2021 Sezione: Fonti e documenti 3.11 From one Disaster to another: Japan’s Earthquake FLORIAN COULMAS Univ. of Duisburg-Essen. IN-EAST Institute for East Asian Studies This paper recounts the experience of the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake on 11th March 2011 and offers an assessment of reactions to it on personal, social and policy levels. Almost a decade after the event, it looks at traces of the disaster, discussing in particular the following questions. What were the consequences if any for Japan’s energy policy? What other conse- quences were there, for example, concerning crisis management? How did people integrate the earthquake into their view of history? How did the earthquake affect people’s life satisfaction? And how does it relate to current events? It argues that despite its for all concerned unpre- cedented severity the disaster led to gradual improvements, rather than fundamental change. Recollection: a personal view Is ten years ago “history”? To me it is the recent past. In a sense it’s the extended present; it is still with me. Just like the majority of the books of my library I then had, the Japanese porcelain cup of my morning coffee, even the car that I drive.
    [Show full text]
  • E Great East Japan Earthquake
    e Great East Japan Earthquake A story of a devastating natural disaster, a tale of human compassion 11 March 2011 The Great East Japan Earthquake A story of a devastating natural disaster, A tale of human compassion 11 March 2011 WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data The great east Japan earthquake: a story of devastating natural disaster, a tale of human compassion 1. Disasters. 2. Earthquakes. 3. Emergency medical services. 4. Japan. 5. Relief work. 6. Risk assessment. I. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific. ISBN 978 92 9061 568 2 (NLM Classification: WA295) © World Health Organization 2012 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce WHO publications, in part or in whole, or to translate them – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). For WHO Western Pacific Regional Publications, request for permission to reproduce should be addressed to Publications Office, World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, P.O. Box 2932, 1000, Manila, Philippines, fax: +632 521 1036, e-mail: [email protected] The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Paleo-Tsunami Deposits During the Last 4000 Years and Their
    Ishimura and Miyauchi Progress in Earth and Planetary Science (2015) 2:16 DOI 10.1186/s40645-015-0047-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Historical and paleo-tsunami deposits during the last 4000 years and their correlations with historical tsunami events in Koyadori on the Sanriku Coast, northeastern Japan Daisuke Ishimura1* and Takahiro Miyauchi2 Abstract Large tsunamis occurring throughout the past several hundred years along the Sanriku Coast on the Pacific coast of northeastern Japan have been documented and observed. However, the risk of large tsunamis like the tsunami generated by the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake could not be evaluated from previous studies, because these studies lacked evidence of historical and paleo-tsunami deposits on the coastline. Thus, we first identified event deposits, which are candidates for tsunami deposits, from excavating surveys conducted on the coastal marsh in Koyadori on the Sanriku Coast, northeastern Japan. Second, we determined the physicochemical sediment properties of the deposits (roundness of grains, color, wet and dry densities, and loss on ignition) and established their geochronology by radiocarbon dating and tephra analysis. Third, we identified event deposits as tsunami deposits, based on their sedimentary features and origin, sedimentary environment, paleo-shoreline, and landowner interviews. In this study, we report 11 tsunami deposits (E1–E11) during the past 4000 years, of which E1, E2, E3, and E4 were correlated with the 2011 Tohoku-oki tsunami, the 1896 Meiji Sanriku tsunami, the 1611 Keicho Sanriku tsunami, and the 869 Jogan tsunami, respectively. From age data and the number of tsunami deposits in the trench, we estimated that tsunamis larger than the 1896 Meiji Sanriku tsunami occur and hit the study area on average every 290–390 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Fish Specimens Collected from the Tohoku District by the Saito Ho-On Kai Museum of Natural History
    Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. A, 35(1), pp. 9–54, March 22, 2009 Historical Fish Specimens Collected from the Tohoku District by the Saito Ho-on Kai Museum of Natural History Keiichi Matsuura1, Gento Shinohara2 and Masanori Nakae1 1 Collection Center, National Museum of Nature and Science, 3–23–1 Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169–0073 Japan E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 3–23–1 Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169–0073 Japan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The fish collection of the Saito Ho-on Kai Museum of Natural History was transferred to the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo in February 2006. Ninety percent of the fish collection contains specimens collected from the Tohoku District during the period from 1930 to 1933 when natural environments of Japan were in good condition for various groups of fishes. The fish specimens from the Tohoku District were classified into 361 species/subspecies of 273 genera belonging to 131 families of 31 orders. A list of the species is shown with remarks on distribution. Key words: Fish specimens, Saito Ho-on Kai Museum, Tohoku District, inventory. stead of natural sicence. The museum has tried to Introduction keep its activity at the level before the war, but it The Saito Ho-on Kai Museum was established failed to do so because of financial difficulties. In in November 1933 in Sendai City, Miyagi Pre- 2005, the Saito Ho-on Kai Museum of Natural fecture, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • English Language: J …Japanese E …English Organizer:Org
    Transmitting Practical Disaster Prevention Studies from Tohoku to the World Information Transmitted by IRIDeS The institute holds periodic meetings for the purpose of transmitting information and achieving cooperation and integration. 1 Expanded general meeting ●IRIDeS Now Shares information inside IRIDeS. ●Information on the IRIDeS Friday Forum Shares information on the content of research activities. ●Great East Japan Earthquake Watcher Follows the various activities in disaster sites and inside and outside of Japan, and social movements. 2 IRIDeS Friday Forum This forum is held on the evening of the 4th Friday of each month as a place for periodic announcements and discussions for the purpose of sharing information related to the research and other activities conducted at IRIDeS and to foster cooperation and integration in research. For details, 020153.03 see the website (http://irides.tohoku.ac.jp/event/irides-forum.html). Information is also published on the IRIDeS website. ●Activity announcements http://www.irides.tohoku.ac.jp/topics/index.html ●Future plans http://shinrokuden.irides.tohoku.ac.jp/ A three year journey traveled together with disaster affected areas Evolving disaster prevention and reduction. Creating a society prepared for large-scale disasters. IRIDeS Report 03 Issued on March 7, 2015 Edited and issued by the Tohoku University Name: IRIDeS International Research Institute of Disaster Science Symbolizes the Iris sanguinea, Iris laevigata, and Iris ensata, For queries regarding this document, as well as hope and nobility contact the following: Meaning of the logo: Reverses the Chinese character for ●Phone: 022-752-2049 “disaster”, to symbolize the determination for overcoming ●E-mail: [email protected] Close Up disasters by promoting recovery and reconstruction, and (Ask for Shosuke Sato or Kiyoshi Ito) creating a society that can intelligently handle disasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Minamisanriku Section Minamisanriku San San Shopping District Pedestrians, Or Have Roads with Heavy Traffic
    141°22′ 23′ 24′ 25′ 26′ 27′ 28′ 29′ 30′ 31′ 32′ 33′ 34′ 35′ From mid- to late May, see 50,000 azaleas in full bloom Toilet closed from December to mid-April Toilet closed from December to mid-April True Kesennuma City North 45’ 45’ 2 “Gyoja no Michi” Religious Path Magnetic 7°50′ 3 Mt. Tatsugane 行者の道 North 田束山 Cross stream, careful during high water Grave of Mankai Shonin Wooden sign with white lettering for “ふるさと緑の道” hiking course. 1 Arasawa Fudo Temple 荒沢不動尊 4 Thousand Branch Katsura Tree Hinokuchi Assembly Hall 千本桂 44’ 44’ 45 Magnetic North (Magnetic North Line) Snow builds up during winter, Sign: 巨石 (Giant rock) careful walking from here to Mt. Tatsugane The north as indicated by a magnetic compass is approximately 7º50' to the 6 west of true north(Shizugawa Standard.) Giant Boulders at Foot of Mt. Shingyodo Haraikawa Assembly Hall 神行堂山麓の巨石 Kamisawa Assembly Hall Isatomae Fukko Shopping District 伊里前福幸商店街 Go up steep slope 5 Sangan no Sato Viewpoint Utatsu Jr. High School Gym. 山がんの里遠望台 JR Utatsu Station (BRT) 43’ 43’ Cross concrete bridge Hayashigiwa Bus Stop See ice gobies swim upstream in late April to mid-May 8 Iriya Yes Studio Dojishita Community Center Shiki no Sato 入谷 Yes 工房 7 Iriya Hachiman-jinja Shrine 入谷八幡神社 398 Iriya Elem. School Gym. Minami Sanriku Town Minamisanriku Manabi no Sato Iriyado 42’ 42’ 9 Hikoro no Sato (Edo-era Dwelling) 【Iriya Walk】 Great view of rice paddies Try this program walking around ひころの里 the village. Visit the checkpoints Sign for Hikoro no Sato “ひころの里”in Japanese as a team to have lovely Sakurazawa Community Center 45 encounters with Iriya’s rich nature and friendly people.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Incidence of Tuberculosis Infection in the Coastal Region of Northern Miyagi After the Great East Japan Earthquake
    Tohoku J. Exp. Med., 2016, 238, 187-195Increasing Incidence of TB Infection after Tohoku Disaster 187 Increasing Incidence of Tuberculosis Infection in the Coastal Region of Northern Miyagi after the Great East Japan Earthquake Masahiro Sakurai,1 Tatsuya Takahashi,1 Miyako Ohuchi,1 Yuki Terui,1 Kouji Kiryu2 and Kazuo Shikano1 1Division of Health and Welfare, Miyagi Prefectural Government, Ishinomaki, Miyagi, Japan 2Division of Health and Welfare, Metropolitan Government, Tokyo, Japan On March 11, 2011, the Great East Japan Earthquake struck off the northeast coast of Japan. Within an hour of the earthquake, devastating tsunamis swept over the coastal region of the Miyagi Prefecture, facing Pacific Ocean. Accordingly, more than 400,000 residents were forced to stay at evacuation shelters. We investigated the changes in tuberculosis prevalence after the disaster. Annual data for all tuberculosis patients between April 1, 2009 and March 31, 2013 were extracted from the database of the Miyagi Prefectural Government. In the coastal region of Northern Miyagi, the number of tuberculosis patients increased in the post-disaster period (p < 0.001, 9.6 vs.19.1 per 100,000 people), compared to the pre-disaster period. In contrast, its prevalence did not change in the inland region of Northern Miyagi and the coastal and inland regions of Southern Miyagi. Importantly, in the inland and coastal regions of Northern Miyagi, the number of patients with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) increased in the post- disaster period (p < 0.001). Furthermore, in the coastal shelters, 11 evacuees with the history of contacting tuberculosis patients were diagnosed with LTBI, whereas no cases of LTBI patients were observed in the inland shelters.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Earthquake Reconstruction Continues to Blaze Trail Into
    lakyara vol.190 Special Edition Post-earthquake reconstruction continues to blaze trail into uncharted territory - Interview with Shinya Endo, General Manager, Miyagi Prefecture Civil Engineering Department - 18.March 2014 Special Edition Post-earthquake reconstruction continues to blaze trail into uncharted territory vol.190 Executive Summary Miyagi Prefecture was particularly hard-hit by the catastrophic Great East Japan Earthquake of March 2011. It is now implementing a ten-year reconstruction plan in three phases. The first phase (three years) is restoration to the pre-earthquake status quo. In the second phase (four years), the Prefecture plans to revitalize (upgrade) its infrastructure to where it would have been if the earthquake had never occurred. In the third phase (three years), the Prefecture aims to better fortify itself against future natural disasters. With no model to follow for any of the three phases, Miyagi Prefecture is grappling with difficult challenges on a daily basis. NRI's Fumihiko Kamio spoke to Shinya Endo, head of Miyagi Prefecture's reconstruction program, about the challenges that lie ahead in 2014, the first year of the ten-year plan's revitalization phase. Shinya Endo General Manager, Miyagi Prefecture Civil Engineering Department Hired by Miyagi Prefecture in 1979. Has worked at prefecture's Ishinomaki Civil Engineering Office, Urban Planning Section, Sendai-Higashi Civil Engineering, Kessennuma Civil Engineering, Road Construction Section, Civil Engineering General Affairs Section, Tokyo Office, and Planning Department's Policy Section. Promoted to Deputy General Manager of Civil Engineering Department in April 2011 after managing Urban Planning Section and Roads Section. Assumed current post in April 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to the Great East Japan Earthquake in the Three Years from March 2011
    Response to the Great East Japan Earthquake in the Three Years from March 2011 JICA has continued related supportive activities during Yolanda in the Philippines), which struck the middle part of the three years from the right after the earthquake of the Philippines on November 8 and 9, 2013, JICA provided March 11, 2011, to the present. In the beginning, the main information on the study of reconstruction processes from activity was direct support, including shelter for evacuees, large-scale disasters, and officials from Higashimatsushima dispatch of JICA staff and former volunteers, coordination of City, Miyagi Prefecture, visited the damage area and gave international organizations from overseas, and cooperation advice based on the experiences of the Great East Japan with NGOs, which played a central part in people’s support Earthquake. to the damage area. At the present time JICA engages JICA uses Japan’s experience of recovery and recon- in information-sharing and submission, compilation of struction from large-scale disasters, including the Great lessons learned from reconstruction efforts, and support to East Japan Earthquake, for international cooperation to international conferences. developing countries. Regarding the damage by Typhoon Haiyan (called (1) Accommodation of people unable to return home, shelter for evacuees, provision of disaster 1. prevention supplies and storage space, and donation of money collected Tohoku Earthquake (2) Dispatch of JICA staff to NGOs, municipalities, and universities, offering of office space
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Tsunami Flood Situation from the Great East Japan Earthquake 55
    Assessment of Tsunami Flood Situation from the Great East Japan Earthquake 55 Assessment of Tsunami Flood Situation from the Great East Japan Earthquake Hidetoshi NAKAJIMA and Mamoru KOARAI Abstract The massive tsunami from the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake (hereinafter referred to as the “Tohoku Pacific Coast Earthquake”) that occurred on March 11, 2011, caused devastating damages along the Pacific Coast. The GSI immediately formed an emergency team and started investigating to uncover the situation of tsunami damage. We emphasized on promptness in the beginning of the survey, created the "Tsunami flood area overview map" with a purpose of improving the accuracy in our best effort over time, and kept on distributing the maps to the municipalities of the affected areas, the national disaster response headquarters etc, while also releasing this information on the GSI website. In addition to calculating the areas of inundation by the municipalities and by land use, an attempt was made to analyze the distance and elevation reached by tsunami in coastal Miyagi Prefecture. Furthermore, elevation was measured precisely by aerial laser survey mainly on areas where ground subsidence occurred due to the earthquake, and high precision elevation data and the digital elevation topographic map have been prepared/provided. 1. Creating an inundation area overview map There are two types of error cause which are 1.1 Method of creation "interpretation error" and "error in transferring onto Immediately after the tsunami disasters triggered by topographic map". Since single (aerial) photographs are the Tohoku Pacific Coast Earthquake on March 11th, the used for the interpretation, difference in landform GSI decided to create an "Tsunami flood area overview interpretation skills has little effect on the former, whereas map" to find out the situation of tsunami damage, and landform interpretation skills would be required to minimize created a damage overview map and also discussed about the latter.
    [Show full text]