DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture 11 – Harmonic Functions 1 Harmonic Conjugate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lecture 11 – Harmonic Functions 1 Harmonic Conjugate Lecture 11 { Harmonic functions MATH-GA 2451.001 Complex Variables On several occasions in this course we pointed out close links between results obtained for analytic functions and results concerning harmonic functions we may already know from courses on Partial Differential Equations. The purpose of this lecture is to give these links a rigorous background. 1 Harmonic conjugate 1.1 Harmonic functions Definition: A function u :(x; y) 2 Ω ! R is harmonic if @2u @2u ∆u := + = 0 ; 8 (x; y) 2 Ω @x2 @y2 We already know that if f(z) = u(x; y) + iv(x; y), with z = x + iy, is analytic in Ω, then u and v satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann relations, and are therefore harmonic in Ω. @u @u Furthermore, it is easy to see that if u is harmonic in Ω, then g(z) = @x − i @y is analytic in Ω, since the real and imaginary parts of g satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann relations. Thus, the natural question which comes to mind is the following: under which conditions does a harmonic function u on Ω have a harmonic conjugate v :Ω ! R such that f = u + iv is analytic on Ω? To see that the answer to this question is not trivial, condider the function u(x; y) = ln(px2 + y2) on the set R2 n f0g. The issue in that particular case is that there does not exist a single-valued conjugate function. 1.2 Conjugate differential of u @u @u As we said before, if u is harmonic in an open connected set Ω, f(z) = @x − i @y is analytic in Ω. We may write the differential @u @u @u @u fdz = dx + dy + i − dx + dy @x @y @y @x In the real part, we recognize the differential du. If u has a conjugate harmonic function v, the imaginary part is dv. In general, however, there does not exist a single-valued v. We thus define @u @u ?du := − dx + dy @y @x ?du is called the conjugate differential of u, and ? is called the Hodge ?-operator. We may write fdz = du + i ? du Lemma: Let γ be a cycle in Ω Z ?du = 0 if γ ∼ 0 (mod Ω) γ The proof is immediate: Z Z Z f(z)dz = du + i ?du γ γ γ The integral on the left-hand side is equal to zero by Cauchy's theorem, since γ ∼ 0 (mod Ω). The first integral on the right-hand size is equal to zero since du is an exact differential and γ is a cycle. We conclude R that γ ?du = 0 if γ ∼ 0 (mod Ω). Theorem: In a simply connected open set Ω, any harmonic function u has a single-valued conjugate function v which is uniquely determined up to an additive constant. R Proof : For the proof of existence, observe that since Ω is simply connected, γ ?du = 0 for all cycles γ in Ω. ?du is therefore an exact differential on Ω, and by the theorem at the end of page 3 in Lecture 4, we know that there is a single-valued function v(x; y) such that @v @u @v @u = − ; = @x @y @y @x 1 This v is a single-valued conjugate function of u. To show uniqueness, consider two such harmonic conjugates v1 and v2. f1 = u + iv1 and f2 = u + iv2 are both analytic on Ω, so f1 − f2 = i(v1 − v2) is analytic on Ω. We thus have an analytic function g = f1 − f2 which maps Ω to the imaginary axis. By the open mapping theorem, g must be a constant: 9 K 2 C such that f1 = f2 + K 2 Mean-value property In what follows, we will often use (x; y) 2 R2 and z = x + iy 2 C interchangeably, and allow ourselves this abuse of notation for the sake of the simplicity of the expressions. 2.1 The mean-value property Theorem: Consider an open connected set Ω and a harmonic function u :Ω ! R. Let DR(z0) ⊂ Ω be a closed disk. Then Z 2π 1 iθ u(z0) = u(z0 + Re )dθ 2π 0 Proof : From the previous section, we know that u has a harmonic conjugate v on the disk DR(z0). We can then consider f = u + iv, which is analytic, and use the Cauchy integral formula to write Z 2π 1 iθ f(z0) = f(z0 + Re )dθ 2π 0 Taking the real part of this equality yields the desired theorem. Corollary: A nonconstant harmonic function has neither a maximum nor a minimum in any open connected set in which it is defined. Consequently, if a nonconstant harmonic function is defined on a closed bounded set E, its maximum and minimum are taken on the boundary of E. Proof : Suppose u reaches a maximum M at a point z0 in the interior of Ω. There exists R > 0 such that DR(z0) ⊂ Ω and 8z 2 DR(z0), u(z) ≤ u(z0). Suppose there exists a 2 DR(z0) such that u(a) < u(z0) = M. Consider the circle with radius r centered in z0 and going through a, By the mean-value theorem, Z 2π 1 iθ M = u(z0) = u(z0 + re )dθ < M 2π 0 This is a contradiction. To obtain the result regarding the minimum, apply the same proof to the harmonic function w = −u Corollary: If u1 and u2 are two continuous functions on a closed bounded set E which are harmonic in the interior of E and such that u1 = u2 on the boundary of E, then u1 = u2 in E. In other words, functions satisfying the conditions above are uniquely determined by their values on the boundary. 2.2 Poisson's formula Theorem: Suppose that u is harmonic on DR(0) and continuous on DR(0). Then, 8a 2 DR(0), 1 Z R2 − jaj2 u(a) = 2 u(z)dθ (1) 2π jzj=R jz − aj Proof : The idea is that the mean-value theorem gives us a formula for u(0). All we need to do is apply a linear transformation which moves the point a to the center. This is done as follows. Let us assume first that u is harmonic on DR(0). The linear transformation Rζ + a S : ζ 7! z = R R + aζ 2 maps D1(0) onto DR(0), and is such that S(0) = a. Now, the function ζ 2 D1(0) 7! u(S(ζ)) is harmonic on D1(0). By the mean value property, we can write i Z dζ u(S(0)) = u(a) = − u(S(ζ)) 2π jζj=1 ζ We know that S can be inverted, with inverse R(z − a) ζ = S−1(z) = R2 − az Hence, dζ 1 a = + dz ζ z − a R2 − az When jζj = 1, jzj = R, so introducing the argument θ of z on jzj = R, we have dζ iz iza iz ia R2 − jaj2 = + dθ = + = i dθ ζ z − a R2 − az z − a z − a jz − aj2 so that 1 Z R2 − jaj2 u(a) = 2 u(z)dθ 2π jzj=R jz − aj as desired. This formula is known as Poisson's formula. We may get an alternate form for it by observing that R2 − jaj2 R2 − jaj2 z a 1 z + a z + a z + a = < = < + = + = < jz − aj2 jz − aj2 z − a z − a 2 z − a z − a z − a We have shown that Poisson's formula could also be written as 1 Z z + a u(a) = < u(z)dθ 2π jzj=R z − a which may yet again be rewritten as follows: ! 1 Z z + a u(z) 8a 2 DR(0) ; u(a) = < dz (2) 2πi jzj=R z − a z The function in parenthesis in (2) is an analytic function of a for jaj < R, so the expression above gives us the conjugate function of u: u is the real part of the analytic function 1 Z ζ + z u(ζ) f(z) = dζ + iK ; K 2 R (3) 2πi jζj=R ζ − z ζ This result is sometimes called Schwarz's formula. The careful reader will have noticed that we still have not proved that Poisson's formula holds even if u is harmonic in the open disk only, and continuous in the closed disk. To address that case, consider δ such that 0 < δ < 1 andu ~ := u(δz). u~ is harmonic in DR(0) so we can write 8a 2 DR(0), 1 Z R2 − jaj2 u(δa) = 2 u(δz)dθ 2π jzj=R jz − aj Now, u is continuous on the compact set DR(0), so it is uniformly continuous on that set by the Heine-Cantor theorem. Taking the limit δ ! 1 in the modified Poisson's formula above, we find by uniform continuity that Poisson's formula holds for the closed disk as well. 3 2.3 Schwarz's theorem Poisson's formula can be viewed as a way to define a function inside a disk from the values u(z) on the circle jzj = R of a function u which may only be defined on that circle. We have seen that a function defined in this way is harmonic, as the real part of an analytic function. A natural question then is: does this function have boundary value u(z) on jzj = R? Schwarz's theorem, given below, answers this question. Theorem (Schwarz's theorem): Given a piecewise continuous function u on [0; 2π], the Poisson integral 1 Z 2π eiθ + z Pu(z) = < iθ u(θ)dθ 2π 0 e − z is harmonic for jzj < 1, and lim P (z) = u(θ ) if u is continuous at θ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Best Subordinant for Differential Superordinations of Harmonic Complex-Valued Functions
    mathematics Article Best Subordinant for Differential Superordinations of Harmonic Complex-Valued Functions Georgia Irina Oros Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Faculty of Informatics and Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania; [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 17 September 2020; Accepted: 11 November 2020; Published: 16 November 2020 Abstract: The theory of differential subordinations has been extended from the analytic functions to the harmonic complex-valued functions in 2015. In a recent paper published in 2019, the authors have considered the dual problem of the differential subordination for the harmonic complex-valued functions and have defined the differential superordination for harmonic complex-valued functions. Finding the best subordinant of a differential superordination is among the main purposes in this research subject. In this article, conditions for a harmonic complex-valued function p to be the best subordinant of a differential superordination for harmonic complex-valued functions are given. Examples are also provided to show how the theoretical findings can be used and also to prove the connection with the results obtained in 2015. Keywords: differential subordination; differential superordination; harmonic function; analytic function; subordinant; best subordinant MSC: 30C80; 30C45 1. Introduction and Preliminaries Since Miller and Mocanu [1] (see also [2]) introduced the theory of differential subordination, this theory has inspired many researchers to produce a number of analogous notions, which are extended even to non-analytic functions, such as strong differential subordination and superordination, differential subordination for non-analytic functions, fuzzy differential subordination and fuzzy differential superordination. The notion of differential subordination was adapted to fit the harmonic complex-valued functions in the paper published by S.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonic Functions
    Lecture 1 Harmonic Functions 1.1 The Definition Definition 1.1. Let Ω denote an open set in R3. A real valued function u(x, y, z) on Ω with continuous second partials is said to be harmonic if and only if the Laplacian ∆u = 0 identically on Ω. Note that the Laplacian ∆u is defined by ∂2u ∂2u ∂2u ∆u = + + . ∂x2 ∂y2 ∂z2 We can make a similar definition for an open set Ω in R2.Inthatcase, u is harmonic if and only if ∂2u ∂2u ∆u = + =0 ∂x2 ∂y2 on Ω. Some basic examples of harmonic functions are 2 2 2 3 u = x + y 2z , Ω=R , − 1 3 u = , Ω=R (0, 0, 0), r − where r = x2 + y2 + z2. Moreover, by a theorem on complex variables, the real part of an analytic function on an open set Ω in 2 is always harmonic. p R Thus a function such as u = rn cos nθ is a harmonic function on R2 since u is the real part of zn. 1 2 1.2 The Maximum Principle The basic result about harmonic functions is called the maximum principle. What the maximum principle says is this: if u is a harmonic function on Ω, and B is a closed and bounded region contained in Ω, then the max (and min) of u on B is always assumed on the boundary of B. Recall that since u is necessarily continuous on Ω, an absolute max and min on B are assumed. The max and min can also be assumed inside B, but a harmonic function cannot have any local extrema inside B.
    [Show full text]
  • 23. Harmonic Functions Recall Laplace's Equation
    23. Harmonic functions Recall Laplace's equation ∆u = uxx = 0 ∆u = uxx + uyy = 0 ∆u = uxx + uyy + uzz = 0: Solutions to Laplace's equation are called harmonic functions. The inhomogeneous version of Laplace's equation ∆u = f is called the Poisson equation. Harmonic functions are Laplace's equation turn up in many different places in mathematics and physics. Harmonic functions in one variable are easy to describe. The general solution of uxx = 0 is u(x) = ax + b, for constants a and b. Maximum principle Let D be a connected and bounded open set in R2. Let u(x; y) be a harmonic function on D that has a continuous extension to the boundary @D of D. Then the maximum (and minimum) of u are attained on the bound- ary and if they are attained anywhere else than u is constant. Euivalently, there are two points (xm; ym) and (xM ; yM ) on the bound- ary such that u(xm; ym) ≤ u(x; y) ≤ u(xM ; yM ) for every point of D and if we have equality then u is constant. The idea of the proof is as follows. At a maximum point of u in D we must have uxx ≤ 0 and uyy ≤ 0. Most of the time one of these inequalities is strict and so 0 = uxx + uyy < 0; which is not possible. The only reason this is not a full proof is that sometimes both uxx = uyy = 0. As before, to fix this, simply perturb away from zero. Let > 0 and let v(x; y) = u(x; y) + (x2 + y2): Then ∆v = ∆u + ∆(x2 + y2) = 4 > 0: 1 Thus v has no maximum in D.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonic Forms, Minimal Surfaces and Norms on Cohomology of Hyperbolic 3-Manifolds
    Harmonic Forms, Minimal Surfaces and Norms on Cohomology of Hyperbolic 3-Manifolds Xiaolong Hans Han Abstract We bound the L2-norm of an L2 harmonic 1-form in an orientable cusped hy- perbolic 3-manifold M by its topological complexity, measured by the Thurston norm, up to a constant depending on M. It generalizes two inequalities of Brock and Dunfield. We also study the sharpness of the inequalities in the closed and cusped cases, using the interaction of minimal surfaces and harmonic forms. We unify various results by defining two functionals on orientable closed and cusped hyperbolic 3-manifolds, and formulate several questions and conjectures. Contents 1 Introduction2 1.1 Motivation and previous results . .2 1.2 A glimpse at the non-compact case . .3 1.3 Main theorem . .4 1.4 Topology and the Thurston norm of harmonic forms . .5 1.5 Minimal surfaces and the least area norm . .5 1.6 Sharpness and the interaction between harmonic forms and minimal surfaces6 1.7 Acknowledgments . .6 2 L2 Harmonic Forms and Compactly Supported Cohomology7 2.1 Basic definitions of L2 harmonic forms . .7 2.2 Hodge theory on cusped hyperbolic 3-manifolds . .9 2.3 Topology of L2-harmonic 1-forms and the Thurston Norm . 11 2.4 How much does the hyperbolic metric come into play? . 14 arXiv:2011.14457v2 [math.GT] 23 Jun 2021 3 Minimal Surface and Least Area Norm 14 3.1 Truncation of M and the definition of Mτ ................. 16 3.2 The least area norm and the L1-norm . 17 4 L1-norm, Main theorem and The Proof 18 4.1 Bounding L1-norm by L2-norm .
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Analysis
    Complex Analysis Andrew Kobin Fall 2010 Contents Contents Contents 0 Introduction 1 1 The Complex Plane 2 1.1 A Formal View of Complex Numbers . .2 1.2 Properties of Complex Numbers . .4 1.3 Subsets of the Complex Plane . .5 2 Complex-Valued Functions 7 2.1 Functions and Limits . .7 2.2 Infinite Series . 10 2.3 Exponential and Logarithmic Functions . 11 2.4 Trigonometric Functions . 14 3 Calculus in the Complex Plane 16 3.1 Line Integrals . 16 3.2 Differentiability . 19 3.3 Power Series . 23 3.4 Cauchy's Theorem . 25 3.5 Cauchy's Integral Formula . 27 3.6 Analytic Functions . 30 3.7 Harmonic Functions . 33 3.8 The Maximum Principle . 36 4 Meromorphic Functions and Singularities 37 4.1 Laurent Series . 37 4.2 Isolated Singularities . 40 4.3 The Residue Theorem . 42 4.4 Some Fourier Analysis . 45 4.5 The Argument Principle . 46 5 Complex Mappings 47 5.1 M¨obiusTransformations . 47 5.2 Conformal Mappings . 47 5.3 The Riemann Mapping Theorem . 47 6 Riemann Surfaces 48 6.1 Holomorphic and Meromorphic Maps . 48 6.2 Covering Spaces . 52 7 Elliptic Functions 55 7.1 Elliptic Functions . 55 7.2 Elliptic Curves . 61 7.3 The Classical Jacobian . 67 7.4 Jacobians of Higher Genus Curves . 72 i 0 Introduction 0 Introduction These notes come from a semester course on complex analysis taught by Dr. Richard Carmichael at Wake Forest University during the fall of 2010. The main topics covered include Complex numbers and their properties Complex-valued functions Line integrals Derivatives and power series Cauchy's Integral Formula Singularities and the Residue Theorem The primary reference for the course and throughout these notes is Fisher's Complex Vari- ables, 2nd edition.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMPACT of RIEMANN's MAPPING THEOREM in the World
    THE IMPACT OF RIEMANN'S MAPPING THEOREM GRANT OWEN In the world of mathematics, scholars and academics have long sought to understand the work of Bernhard Riemann. Born in a humble Ger- man home, Riemann became one of the great mathematical minds of the 19th century. Evidence of his genius is reflected in the greater mathematical community by their naming 72 different mathematical terms after him. His contributions range from mathematical topics such as trigonometric series, birational geometry of algebraic curves, and differential equations to fields in physics and philosophy [3]. One of his contributions to mathematics, the Riemann Mapping Theorem, is among his most famous and widely studied theorems. This theorem played a role in the advancement of several other topics, including Rie- mann surfaces, topology, and geometry. As a result of its widespread application, it is worth studying not only the theorem itself, but how Riemann derived it and its impact on the work of mathematicians since its publication in 1851 [3]. Before we begin to discover how he derived his famous mapping the- orem, it is important to understand how Riemann's upbringing and education prepared him to make such a contribution in the world of mathematics. Prior to enrolling in university, Riemann was educated at home by his father and a tutor before enrolling in high school. While in school, Riemann did well in all subjects, which strengthened his knowl- edge of philosophy later in life, but was exceptional in mathematics. He enrolled at the University of G¨ottingen,where he learned from some of the best mathematicians in the world at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Laplace's Equation and Harmonic Func- Tions
    21 Laplace's Equation and Harmonic Func- tions 21.1 Introductory Remarks on the Laplacian operator Given a domain Ω ⊂ Rd, then r2u = div(grad u) = 0 in Ω (1) is Laplace's equation defined in Ω. If d = 2, in cartesian coordinates @2u @2u r2u = + @x2 @y2 or, in polar coordinates 1 @ @u 1 @2u r2u = r + : r @r @r r2 @θ2 If d = 3, in cartesian coordinates @2u @2u @2u r2u = + + @x2 @y2 @z2 while in cylindrical coordinates 1 @ @u 1 @2u @2u r2u = r + + r @r @r r2 @θ2 @z2 and in spherical coordinates 1 @ @u 1 @2u @u 1 @2u r2u = ρ2 + + cot φ + : ρ2 @ρ @ρ ρ2 @φ2 @φ sin2 φ @θ2 We deal with problems involving most of these cases within these Notes. Remark: There is not a universally accepted angle notion for the Laplacian in spherical coordinates. See Figure 1 for what θ; φ mean here. (In the rest of these Notes we will use the notation r for the radial distance from the origin, no matter what the dimension.) 1 Figure 1: Coordinate angle definitions that will be used for spherical coordi- nates in these Notes. Remark: In the math literature the Laplacian is more commonly written with the symbol ∆; that is, Laplace's equation becomes ∆u = 0. For these Notes we write the equation as is done in equation (1) above. The non-homogeneous version of Laplace's equation, namely r2u = f(x) (2) is called Poisson's equation. Another important equation that comes up in studying electromagnetic waves is Helmholtz's equation: r2u + k2u = 0 k2 is a real, positive parameter (3) Again, Poisson's equation is a non-homogeneous Laplace's equation; Helm- holtz's equation is not.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Complex Analysis
    Chapter 2 Complex Analysis In this part of the course we will study some basic complex analysis. This is an extremely useful and beautiful part of mathematics and forms the basis of many techniques employed in many branches of mathematics and physics. We will extend the notions of derivatives and integrals, familiar from calculus, to the case of complex functions of a complex variable. In so doing we will come across analytic functions, which form the centerpiece of this part of the course. In fact, to a large extent complex analysis is the study of analytic functions. After a brief review of complex numbers as points in the complex plane, we will ¯rst discuss analyticity and give plenty of examples of analytic functions. We will then discuss complex integration, culminating with the generalised Cauchy Integral Formula, and some of its applications. We then go on to discuss the power series representations of analytic functions and the residue calculus, which will allow us to compute many real integrals and in¯nite sums very easily via complex integration. 2.1 Analytic functions In this section we will study complex functions of a complex variable. We will see that di®erentiability of such a function is a non-trivial property, giving rise to the concept of an analytic function. We will then study many examples of analytic functions. In fact, the construction of analytic functions will form a basic leitmotif for this part of the course. 2.1.1 The complex plane We already discussed complex numbers briefly in Section 1.3.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonic and Real Analysis Herbert Koch Universit¨Atbonn Wintersemester 2014-2015
    Notes for Harmonic and real analysis Herbert Koch Universit¨atBonn Wintersemester 2014-2015 Recommended literature: [10, 7, 14, 13, 15] 1 Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 5 1. An example 5 Chapter 2. Fourier series 9 1. Definitions 9 2. The convolution and Young's inequality 10 3. Lp convergence of partial sums 15 4. Regularity and Fourier series 16 5. Complex Interpolation 17 6. The Hardy-Littlewood maximal function and real interpolation 21 7. Higher dimensions 30 Chapter 3. Harmonic functions and the Poisson kernel 31 1. Basic properties and the Poisson kernel 31 2. Boundary behaviour of harmonic functions 36 3. Almost everywhere convergence 37 4. Subharmonic functions 38 5. The theorems of Riesz 40 6. Conjugate functions 41 7. The Hilbert transform 43 n Chapter 4. The Fourier transform on R 47 1. Definition and first properties 47 2. The Fourier transform of Schwartz functions 48 3. The Fourier transform on tempered distributions 51 4. Oscillatory integrals and stationary phase 58 5. Quantization 64 6. Cotlar's Lemma and the Theorem of Calder´on-Vaillancourt 70 Chapter 5. Singular integrals of Calder´on-Zygmund type 75 1. The setting 75 2. The Calder´on-Zygmund theorem 77 3. Examples 81 Chapter 6. Hardy and BMO 87 1. More general maximal functions and the Hardy space Hp 87 2. The atomic decomposition 91 3. Duality and BMO 95 4. Relation to harmonic functions 98 5. Div-curl type results 100 6. Application to elliptic PDEs 101 7. Pointwise estimates and perturbations of elliptic equations 107 3 4 CONTENTS Chapter 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonic Functions
    6 HARMONIC FUNCTIONS This chapter is devoted to the Laplace equation. We introduce two of its important properties, the maximum principle and the rotational invariance. Then we solve the equation in series form in rectangles, circles, and related shapes. The case of a circle leads to the beautiful Poisson formula. 6.1 LAPLACE’S EQUATION If a diffusion or wave process is stationary (independent of time), then ut 0 ≡ and utt 0. Therefore, both the diffusion and the wave equations reduce to the Laplace≡ equation: uxx 0 in one dimension = u u uxx u yy 0 in two dimensions ∇·∇ = = + = u u uxx u yy uzz 0 in three dimensions ∇·∇ = = + + = A solution of the Laplace equation is called a harmonic function. In one dimension, we have simply uxx 0, so the only harmonic functions in one dimension are u(x) A Bx. But=this is so simple that it hardly gives us a clue to what happens =in higher+ dimensions. The inhomogeneous version of Laplace’s equation u f (1) = with f a given function, is called Poisson’s equation. Besides stationary diffusions and waves, some other instances of Laplace’s and Poisson’s equations include the following. 152 6.1 LAPLACE’S EQUATION 153 1. Electrostatics. From Maxwell’s equations, one has curl E 0 and div E 4πρ, where ρ is the charge density. The first equation implies= E grad= φ for a scalar function φ (called the electric potential). Therefore,=− φ div(grad φ) div E 4πρ , = =− =− which is Poisson’s equation (with f 4πρ ). =− 2. Steady fluid flow.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Laplace's Equation
    3 Laplace’s Equation We now turn to studying Laplace’s equation ∆u = 0 and its inhomogeneous version, Poisson’s equation, ¡∆u = f: We say a function u satisfying Laplace’s equation is a harmonic function. 3.1 The Fundamental Solution Consider Laplace’s equation in Rn, ∆u = 0 x 2 Rn: Clearly, there are a lot of functions u which satisfy this equation. In particular, any constant function is harmonic. In addition, any function of the form u(x) = a1x1 +:::+anxn for constants ai is also a solution. Of course, we can list a number of others. Here, however, we are interested in finding a particular solution of Laplace’s equation which will allow us to solve Poisson’s equation. Given the symmetric nature of Laplace’s equation, we look for a radial solution. That is, we look for a harmonic function u on Rn such that u(x) = v(jxj). In addition, to being a natural choice due to the symmetry of Laplace’s equation, radial solutions are natural to look for because they reduce a PDE to an ODE, which is generally easier to solve. Therefore, we look for a radial solution. If u(x) = v(jxj), then x u = i v0(jxj) jxj 6= 0; xi jxj which implies 1 x2 x2 u = v0(jxj) ¡ i v0(jxj) + i v00(jxj) jxj 6= 0: xixi jxj jxj3 jxj2 Therefore, n ¡ 1 ∆u = v0(jxj) + v00(jxj): jxj Letting r = jxj, we see that u(x) = v(jxj) is a radial solution of Laplace’s equation implies v satisfies n ¡ 1 v0(r) + v00(r) = 0: r Therefore, 1 ¡ n v00 = v0 r v00 1 ¡ n =) = v0 r =) ln v0 = (1 ¡ n) ln r + C C =) v0(r) = ; rn¡1 1 which implies ½ c1 ln r + c2 n = 2 v(r) = c1 (2¡n)rn¡2 + c2 n ¸ 3: From these calculations, we see that for any constants c1; c2, the function ½ c1 ln jxj + c2 n = 2 u(x) ´ c1 (3.1) (2¡n)jxjn¡2 + c2 n ¸ 3: for x 2 Rn, jxj 6= 0 is a solution of Laplace’s equation in Rn ¡ f0g.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of the Cauchy Theory
    Chapter 4 Applications Of The Cauchy Theory This chapter contains several applications of the material developed in Chapter 3. In the first section, we will describe the possible behavior of an analytic function near a singularity of that function. 4.1 Singularities We will say that f has an isolated singularity at z0 if f is analytic on D(z0,r) \{z0} for some r. What, if anything, can be said about the behavior of f near z0? The basic tool needed to answer this question is the Laurent series, an expansion of f(z)in powers of z − z0 in which negative as well as positive powers of z − z0 may appear. In fact, the number of negative powers in this expansion is the key to determining how f behaves near z0. From now on, the punctured disk D(z0,r) \{z0} will be denoted by D (z0,r). We will need a consequence of Cauchy’s integral formula. 4.1.1 Theorem Let f be analytic on an open set Ω containing the annulus {z : r1 ≤|z − z0|≤r2}, 0 <r1 <r2 < ∞, and let γ1 and γ2 denote the positively oriented inner and outer boundaries of the annulus. Then for r1 < |z − z0| <r2, we have 1 f(w) − 1 f(w) f(z)= − dw − dw. 2πi γ2 w z 2πi γ1 w z Proof. Apply Cauchy’s integral formula [part (ii)of (3.3.1)]to the cycle γ2 − γ1. ♣ 1 2 CHAPTER 4. APPLICATIONS OF THE CAUCHY THEORY 4.1.2 Definition For 0 ≤ s1 <s2 ≤ +∞ and z0 ∈ C, we will denote the open annulus {z : s1 < |z−z0| <s2} by A(z0,s1,s2).
    [Show full text]