Perspectives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Perspectives PERSPECTIVES The tragic death of Terri Schiavo, mis- SCIENCE AND SOCIETY used by both ‘right-to-life’ and ‘right-to-die’ activists, recently illustrated to the world the difficulties that surround death in the Death, unconsciousness and the brain vegetative state13–15. Many uneducated commentators have inaccurately referred to Schiavo’s condition as ‘brain dead’ or Steven Laureys ‘neocortical dead’, and her gravestone reads, “Departed This Earth February 25, 1990” Abstract | The concept of death has evolved invention of the positive pressure mechanical — that is, the date on which her brain was as technology has progressed. This has ventilator by Bjorn Ibsen in the 1950s, and damaged (although this was not total, and forced medicine and society to redefine its the widespread use of high-tech intensive she was, therefore, not dead), whereas it was ancient cardiorespiratory centred diagnosis care in the 1960s that cardiac, respiratory and on March 31 2005 that her entire brain died to a neurocentric diagnosis of death. The brain function could be truly dissociated. and her heart irreversibly stopped beating. apparent consensus about the definition of Patients with severe brain damage could now This article has a broad ambit. It discu- death has not yet appeased all controversy. have their heartbeat and systemic circulation sses the medical, philosophical, legal and Ethical, moral and religious concerns provisionally sustained by artificial respira- ethical issues that are involved in the deter- continue to surface and include a prevailing tory support. Such profound unconscious mination of human death. The brain-cen- malaise about possible expansions of states had never been encountered before, tred definition of death has a whole brain, the definition of death to encompass the as, until that time, all such patients had died brainstem and neocortical formulation. At vegetative state or about the feared bias of instantly from apnoea. present, only the two former concepts have formulating criteria so as to facilitate organ The earliest steps towards a neurocentric an accepted medical basis. According to transplantation. definition of death were European5,6. In 1959, the consciousness- or personhood-centred French neurologists Mollaret and Goulon neocortical definition of death, patients in Do we have the right to stop treatment using first discussed the clinical, electrophysiologi- a vegetative state are considered dead. This criteria that pretend to know the boundary cal and ethical issues of what is now known article emphasizes that brain death equals between life and death? as brain death, using the term ‘coma dépassé’ death; focuses on the differences between P. Mollaret and M.Goulon1 (irretrievable coma)1. Unfortunately, their brain death and the vegetative state; argues paper was written in French and remained that the neocortical definition of death can- Only a very bold man, I think, would attempt largely unnoticed by the international com- not be implemented on the basis of reliable to define death. munity. In 1968, the Ad Hoc Committee of anatomical criteria or clinical tests; and H. K. Beecher2 Harvard Medical School, which included briefly discusses the law and ethics of death ten physicians, a theologian, a lawyer and a and the end of life. Throughout history, society and medicine historian of science, published a milestone have struggled with the definition and deter- paper defining death as irreversible coma7. Brain death equals human death mination of death BOX 1. In ancient Egypt The report “opened new areas of law, and Brain death means human death determined and Greece, the heart was thought to create posed new and different problems for theo- by neurological criteria. It is an unfortunate the vital spirits and the absence of a heartbeat logist and ethicist ... it has made physicians term, as it misleadingly suggests that there was regarded as the principal sign of death3. into lawyers, lawyers into physicians, and are two types of death: ‘brain’ death and The first person to consider irreversible both into philosophers”8. Some years later, ‘regular’ death4. There is, however, only one absence of brain function to be equivalent to neuropathological studies showed that dam- type of death, which can be measured in two death was Moses Maimonides (1135–1204), age to the brainstem was critical for brain ways — by cardiorespiratory or neurological the foremost intellectual figure of medieval death9. These findings initiated the concept criteria. This misapprehension might explain Judaism, who argued that the spasmodic of “brainstem death”10 and led UK physicians much of the public and professional confu- jerking observed in decapitated humans did to define brain death as complete, irrevers- sion about brain death. Bernat and colleagues not represent evidence of life as their muscle ible loss of brainstem function11,12: “if the have distinguished three levels of discussion: movements were not indicative of presence of brainstem is dead, the brain is dead, and if the definition or concept of death (a philo- central control4. However, it was not until the the brain is dead, the person is dead”10. sophical matter); the anatomical criteria of NATURE REVIEWS | NEUROSCIENCE VOLUME 6 | NOVEMBER 2005 | 899 PERSPECTIVES Timeline | Medical, philosophical, ethical and legal milestones in death, dying and permanent unconsciousness Fred Plum and Jerome Wada performed the first Nancy Cruzan ruling made no Pope Pius XII ruled that Posner (New York, USA) Japanese heart transplant and legal distinction between Victor Horsley (London) there is no obligation to introduced the term ‘locked was charged with murder. artificial hydration and nutrition published On the Mode of use extraordinary means in syndrome’ to reflect the and other medical treatments Death in Cerebral to prolong life in critically quadriplegia and anarthria Harvard Medical Robert Veatch such as ventilator support, Compression and its ill patients and that it that are brought about by the School Ad Hoc (Georgetown University, First (and only) US and confirmed that these Prevention, which reported the remains for the doctor to disruption of corticospinal Committee defined USA) introduced a Collaborative treatments could be first patients who would now give a definition of the and corticobulbar pathways irreversible coma as a higher brain formulation prospective study withdrawn in patients in an be known as brain dead160. “moment of death”147. in brainstem damage161. new criterion for death7. of death25. on brain death43. irreversible vegetative state150. 1894 1952 1957 1959 1966 1967 1968 1972 1975 1976 1977 1980 1990 1992 Bjorn Ibsen (the ‘father of Mollaret and Goulon Christiaan Barnard Bryan Jennett (Glasgow, Karen Ann Quinlan ruling in Unbalanced BBC University of intensive therapy’) invented (Claude Bernard Hospital, performed the first UK) and Fred Plum (New the USA encourages the television program entitled Pittsburgh, USA, mechanical ventilation Paris, France), coined the human to human York) introduced the term use of living wills and “Transplants — are the protocol for “non- (Copenhagen Kommune term ‘coma dépassé’ and heart transplant (Grote ‘vegetative state’ for ethics committees to donors really dead?” heart-beating Hospital, Denmark). defined death on the basis Schuur, Cape Town, patients with “wakefulness permit the removal of life- alarmed the UK public and donors”48 was of neurological criteria1. South Africa). without awareness”52. sustaining treatments from the number of kidneys established. patients in a permanent donated for transplants vegetative state150. subsequently dropped. death (a philosophical/medical matter); and death. Whole brain and brainstem death are the mutual interaction among all parts26. the practical testing, by way of clinical or both defined as the irreversible cessation of Second, he has presented at least 50 thought- complementary examinations, that death the organism as a whole, but differ in their provoking cases of children and adults with has occurred (a medical matter)16. anatomical interpretation. Because many brain death who were treated aggressively areas of the supratentorial brain (including and had their circulation maintained for The concept of death. At present, the most the neocortex, thalami and basal ganglia) many months or longer30. There have also accepted definition of death is the “perma- cannot be accurately tested for clinical func- been pregnant patients with brain death for nent cessation of the critical functions of the tion in a comatose patient, most bedside tests whom continued intensive care treatment organism as a whole”17. The organism as a for brain death (such as cranial nerve reflexes was requested until the foetus was mature whole is an old concept in theoretical biol- and apnoea testing) directly measure func- enough to be born31–34. The most exceptional ogy18 that refers to its unity and functional tion of the brainstem alone4. The neocortical of such cases was the successful maintenance integrity — not to the simple sum of its formulation of death, which was proposed of a pregnant woman with brain death from parts — and encompasses the concept of an in the early days of the brain death debate25, 17 to 32 weeks of gestation32. These cases organism’s critical system19. Critical func- advocates a fundamentally different concept have been used by Shewmon to show that the tions are those without which the organism of death: the irreversible loss of the capac- neurocentric concept of death
Recommended publications
  • Brain Death and the Cervical Spinal Cord: a Confounding Factor for the Clinical Examination
    Spinal Cord (2010) 48, 2–9 & 2010 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved 1362-4393/10 $32.00 www.nature.com/sc REVIEW Brain death and the cervical spinal cord: a confounding factor for the clinical examination AR Joffe, N Anton and J Blackwood Department of Pediatrics, Stollery Children’s Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Study design: This study is a systematic review. Objectives: Brain death (BD) is a clinical diagnosis, made by documenting absent brainstem functions, including unresponsive coma and apnea. Cervical spinal cord dysfunction would confound clinical diagnosis of BD. Our objective was to determine whether cervical spinal cord dysfunction is common in BD. Methods: A case of BD showing cervical cord compression on magnetic resonance imaging prompted a literature review from 1965 to 2008 for any reports of cervical spinal cord injury associated with brain herniation or BD. Results: A total of 12 cases of brain herniation in meningitis occurred shortly after a lumbar puncture with acute respiratory arrest and quadriplegia. In total, nine cases of acute brain herniation from various non-meningitis causes resulted in acute quadriplegia. The cases suggest that direct compression of the cervical spinal cord, or the anterior spinal arteries during cerebellar tonsillar herniation cause ischemic injury to the cord. No case series of brain herniation specifically mentioned spinal cord injury, but many survivors had severe disability including spastic limbs. Only two pathological series of BD examined the spinal cord; 56–100% of cases had upper cervical spinal cord damage, suggesting infarction from direct compression of the cord or its arterial blood supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Piercing the Veil: the Limits of Brain Death As a Legal Fiction
    University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 48 2015 Piercing the Veil: The Limits of Brain Death as a Legal Fiction Seema K. Shah Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Health Law and Policy Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Seema K. Shah, Piercing the Veil: The Limits of Brain Death as a Legal Fiction, 48 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 301 (2015). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol48/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PIERCING THE VEIL: THE LIMITS OF BRAIN DEATH AS A LEGAL FICTION Seema K. Shah* Brain death is different from the traditional, biological conception of death. Al- though there is no possibility of a meaningful recovery, considerable scientific evidence shows that neurological and other functions persist in patients accurately diagnosed as brain dead. Elsewhere with others, I have argued that brain death should be understood as an unacknowledged status legal fiction. A legal fiction arises when the law treats something as true, though it is known to be false or not known to be true, for a particular legal purpose (like the fiction that corporations are persons).
    [Show full text]
  • Consciousness and Unconsciousness: Cross-Cultural Experience
    Consciousness and Unconsciousness: Cross-Cultural Experience . In the West, consciousness was a topic of considerable interest in 19th-century philosophy and the early development of psychology. The philosopher John Locke, in his Essay Concerning Human Understanding, defined consciousness as "the perception of what passes in a man's own mind." William James in The Principles of Psychology, spoke of the "stream of consciousness," emphasizing the continuous and variable nature of mental content, thus viewing consciousness as a process. James also distinguished "normal, waking" or "rational" consciousness from other types. To study consciousness, 19th-century psychologists proceeded by means of "introspection." This method, deemed unscientific and unreliable because it produced inconsistent findings, was rejected by J. B. Watson and other American psychologists of the behaviorist school in the early 1900s. Consciousness was not a topic of psychological study in the United States for more than forty years. In the 1950s diverse factors emerged in American life and science that made consciousness again a significant area of research in psychology, neurobiology, and philosophy. These factors included the development of psychoactive drugs in psychiatry and in the counterculture; experiments in psychological warfare and brainwashing as a result of the Korean War and the Cold War; studies in cybernetics and artificial intelligence; and developments in brain and sleep research, as well as interest in Eastern religions (Yoga, Zen Buddhism and others). Intensive comparative and experimental research, some under secret governmental auspices, was carried on for some years, beginning in the 1950s. This included work with hallucinogens, particularly LSD-25, also sensory deprivation, biofeedback, sleep research, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Determining Death Based on Neurological Criteria
    GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING DEATH BASED ON NEUROLOGICAL CRITERIA New Jersey 2014 1 These guidelines have been drafted by the New Jersey Ad Hoc Committee on Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria, under the leadership of Dr. John Halperin, M.D. and William Reitsma, RN. We are grateful for the hard work and knowledgeable input of each of the following medical, legal and health care professionals. The authors gratefully acknowledge the work of the New York State Department of Health and the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, and the guidelines for Brain Death Determination they promulgated in 2011. This document provides the foundation for these guidelines. John J. Halperin, M.D., FAAN, FACP Medical Director, Atlantic Neuroscience Institute Chair, Department of Neurosciences Overlook Medical Center Summit, NJ Alan Sori, M.D., FACS Director of Surgical Quality, Saint Joseph's Regional Medical Center Paterson, NJ Bruce J. Grossman, M.D. Director of Pediatric Transport Services Pediatric Intensivist K. Hovnanian Children’s Hospital at Jersey Shore University Medical Center Neptune, NJ Gregory J. Rokosz, D.O., J.D., FACEP Sr. Vice President for Medical and Academic Affairs/CMO Saint Barnabas Medical Center Livingston, NJ Christina Strong, Esq. Law Office of Christina W. Strong Belle Mead, NJ 2 GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING DEATH BASED ON NEUROLOGICAL CRITERIA BACKGROUND This document provides guidance for determining death by neurological criteria (commonly referred to as “brain death”), aims to increase knowledge amongst health care practitioners about the clinical evaluation of death determined by neurological criteria and reduce the potential for variation in brain death determination policies and practices amongst facilities and practitioners within the State of New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    IAPDD 2018 ABSTRACTS A Fate Worse Than Death Todd Karhu ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Ancient Lessons on the Norms of Grief Emilio Comay del Junco ........................................................................................................................ 4 Beyond Morality and the Clinic: Contemplating End-Of-Life Decisions Yael Lavi .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Brainstem Death, Cerebral Death, or Whole-Brain Death? Personal Identity and the Destruction of the Brain Lukas Meier ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Choosing Immortality Tatjana von Solodkoff ............................................................................................................................ 7 Death and Grief Piers Benn ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Death and Possibility Roman Altshuler .................................................................................................................................... 9 Does Death Render Life Absurd? Joshua Thomas ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Death and the Philosophical Significance of the Process Of
    The Linacre Quarterly Volume 68 | Number 1 Article 3 February 2001 Brain Death and the Philosophical Significance of the Process of Development of, and Cessation of, Consciousness in Arousal and Awareness in the Human Person Theodore Gillian Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended Citation Gillian, Theodore (2001) "Brain Death and the Philosophical Significance of the Process of Development of, and Cessation of, Consciousness in Arousal and Awareness in the Human Person," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 68: No. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol68/iss1/3 Brain Death and the Philosophical Significance of the Process of Development of, and Cessation of, Consciousness in Arousal and Awareness in the Human Person. by Theodore Gillian, OFM The author is a priest ofthe Order ofFriars Minor in the Province of the Holy Spirit, residing in Sydney, Australia. Before entering the priesthood, he was a pharmacist I am arguing that the human person, as the human identity from conception to death, links death with the beginnings of life and vice versa. This challenges us to identify the human person as one in a unitary development, physical and spiritual, that is sundered only at death. In approaching the matter from this angle I bring into focus the problem of identifying what happens at death and the problem of identifying what happens at the " beginning of personal life. This requires seeing through our psychological states to discover the necessary substratum that actually is the human person. At the outset, death is taken as the demarcation between the "process of dying and disintegration" (1 Garcia, 37).
    [Show full text]
  • 2. the Diagnosis of Brain Death Applied to the Brainstem Death Concept and the Whole Brain Death Concept
    BRAIN DEATH DIAGNOSIS Index: • 1. The concepts and definitions of brain death • 2. The diagnosis of brain death applied to the brainstem death concept and the whole brain death concept 1 Subject 1. The concepts and definitions of brain death. Section 1: Introduction At present, the main difficulty involved in the development of organ transplant programs is the insufficient amount of organs available for transplantation. Organ supply still proceeds mainly from brain dead deceased. For this reason, the brain death diagnosis is an essential step for the procurement of organs for transplantation. Brain death diagnosis is not only the responsibility of transplant co-coordinators. Therefore all health professionals involved in the donation-transplantation process must have enough knowledge of all the ethical and social aspects besides the concepts of brain death. This information will help them to: 1. Improve the information on brain death, needed to increase transplant programs, 2. Improve the approach towards the potential donors' relatives, giving accurate answers to the questions that they may have concerning brain death, 3. Assess all health professionals not acquainted with the diagnostic methods of brain death, 4. Collaborate logistically (instrument management, serum drug levels, etc.) in difficult cases that may need more atypical methods of diagnosis, and 5. Comprehend the ethical aspects of death diagnosis, since nowadays brain death is synonymous of death; therefore all patients diagnosed with brain death must not be underwent to any further measures to prolong their lives. Section 2: Death. Death as a process Biologically, the death of a human being is not an instantaneous but an evolutionary process through which the different organ functions are gradually extinguished, ending when all the body's cells irreversibly cease to function.
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Death Panel Slides
    SUPPORTING THE BRAIN DEATH DECLARATION THE ROLE OF PALLIATIVE CARE May Ronci, RN, CHPN Lori Carlton-Mowry, MSW, ACSW Frequently What is brain death? Asked Questions Brain death occurs when a person has an irreversible, catastrophic brain injury, which causes total cessation of all What Tests can be used to brain function (the upper brain structure and brain stem). evaluate brain death? Brain death is not a coma or persistent vegetative state. Brain death is determined in the hospital by two physicians. • Apnea Test: The apnea test looks for a patient’s effort to breathe on their own. If • Some causes of brain death include, but are not limited to: someone cannot breath on • Trauma to the brain (i.e. severe head injury caused by a motor vehicle crash, gunshot wound, fall or blow to the head) their own, this is considered a very strong • Cerebrovascular injury (i.e. stroke or aneurysm) confirmatory test for brain • Anoxia (i.e. drowning or heart attack when the patient is revived, but not before a lack of blood flow/oxygen to the brain death. has caused brain death) • Brain tumor • Electroencephalogram (EEG): An EEG measures If my loved one is brain dead, what does that mean? electrical activity in the When someone is brain dead, it means that the brain is no brain. An EEG can help longer working in any capacity and never will again. When caregivers evaluate the brain death is declared, it means your loved one has died. presence of electrical activity of the brain and the Your loved may not appear dead because the chest will type of electrical activity continue to rise and fall with the ventilator providing breaths, that is occurring.
    [Show full text]
  • Locked-In' Syndrome, the Persistent Vegetative State and Brain Death
    Spinal Cord (1998) 36, 741 ± 743 ã 1998 International Medical Society of Paraplegia All rights reserved 1362 ± 4393/98 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/sc Moral Dilemmas Moral dilemmas of tetraplegia; the `locked-in' syndrome, the persistent vegetative state and brain death R Firsching Director and Professor, Klinik fuÈr Neurochirurgie, UniversitaÈtsklinikum, Leipziger Str. 44; 39120 Magdeburg, Germany Keywords: tetraplegia; `locked-in' syndrome; persistent vegetative state; brain death Lesions of the upper part of the spinal cord, the persistent vegetative state (PVS) stand on less safe medulla oblongata or the brain stem have dierent grounds and greater national dierences may be neurological sequelae depending on their exact location discerned: The causes may be variable, ranging from and extent. trauma to hemorrhage, hypoxia and infection. The High tetraplegia with a lesion at the level of the C3 pathomorphology is a matter of debate.5 Findings segment will leave the patient helpless but fully from the most famous PVS patient, KA Quinlan, conscious of his situation, and communication is revealed severe destruction of the thalamus,6 also usually possible. destruction of white matter and extensive destruction The patient who is `locked in' suers from a lesion of the cerebral cortex has been reported. The level of of the pyramidal tract, mostly at the upper pontine ± consciousness in these patients cannot be clari®ed, as cerebral peduncle ± level.1 Communication is reduced they are unresponsive. They are certainly not to vertical eye movements and blinking. comatose, as they open their eyes, and the kind of The persistent vegetative state is a quite hetero- pain perception that these patients have is similarly genous entity, and the underlying lesions are variable.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Deal with Brain Death: Legal and Ethical Considerations] [Jessica Robinson] James Madison University Lexia Ÿ Volume V Ÿ 2
    Lexia: Undergraduate Journal in Writing, Rhetoric & Technical Communication Volume V 2016–2017 [How to Deal with Brain Death: Legal and Ethical Considerations] [Jessica Robinson] James Madison University Lexia Volume V 2 Approximately 3,000 people are diagnosed as brain dead every year. This leads to about 3,000 families fighting to continue treatment, and 3,000 doctors trying to inform those families that their loved ones are gone and cannot come back to life. Brain death can be difficult to deal with because of the varying legal and ethical considerations that must be considered when diagnosing someone as brain dead. There is no distinction between what patients can and can’t do, which makes it difficult for doctors to accurately do their job. Through researching the definition of death, the rights of a patient, and the ethical responsibilities of the doctor and the patient, I noticed a gap between the ethical responsibilities of the doctor and the impact the law has on how the doctor does their job. Following a tonsillectomy in 2013, an eighth-grade girl, Jahi McMath, suffered rare complications which led to severe neurological damage. McMath was pronounced brain dead and doctors recommended the removal of ventilation. McMath’s parents, however, did not believe their daughter was dead; she was breathing, her heart was beating, and her skin was warm and moist. They refused to let the doctors remove McMath from ventilation because they believed their daughter still had a chance at regaining consciousness. The doctors could not refuse her parents’ wishes despite the fact that they knew that McMath would not regain consciousness, and unnecessarily keeping her alive would be wasting scarce hospital resources and the family’s money on a dead body.
    [Show full text]
  • Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Brain Death
    Neurocritical Care Society Neurocrit Care DOI 10.1007/s12028-009-9231-y REVIEW ARTICLE Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Brain Death Katharina M. Busl Æ David M. Greer Ó Humana Press Inc. 2009 Abstract Since the establishment of the concept of death, i.e., brain death. The criteria included unrespon- declaring death by brain criteria, a large extent of variability siveness, absence of movement or breathing, and absence in the determination of brain death has been reported. There of brainstem reflexes. In addition, an isoelectric EEG was are no standardized practical guidelines, and major differ- recommended, and hypothermia and drug intoxication ences exist in the requirements for the declaration of were to be excluded [2]. brain death throughout the USA and internationally. The In 1981, the President’s Commission for the Study of American Academy of Neurology published evidence- Ethical Problems in Medicine and Behavioral Research based practice parameters for the determination of brain issued a landmark report on ‘‘Defining Death’’ and rede- death in adults in 1995, requiring the irreversible absence of fined the criteria for the diagnosis of brain death in adults, clinical brain function with the cardinal features of coma, encompassing the complete cessation of all functions of the absent brainstem reflexes, and apnea, as well as the exclu- entire brain (i.e., ‘‘whole brain concept’’), and its irre- sion of reversible confounders. Ancillary tests are versibility [3]. The Uniform Determination of Death Act, recommended in cases of uncertainty of the clinical diag- which was subsequently adopted as federal legislation by nosis. Every step in the determination of brain death bears most states in the USA, is based on these recommenda- potential pitfalls which can lead to errors in the diagnosis of tions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetative State: Guidance on Diagnosis and Management
    n CLINICAL GUIDANCE The vegetative state: guidance on diagnosis and management A report of a working party of the Royal College of Physicians contrasts with sleep, a state of eye closure and motor Clin Med 1INTRODUCTION quiescence. There are degrees of wakefulness. 2003;3:249–54 Wakefulness is normally associated with conscious awareness, but the VS indicates that wakefulness and Background awareness can be dissociated. This can occur because 1.1 This guidance has been compiled to replace the brain systems controlling wakefulness, in the the recommendations published by the Royal College upper brainstem and thalamus, are largely distinct of Physicians in 1996, 1 in response to requests for from those which mediate awareness. 6 clarification from the Official Solicitor. The guidance applies primarily to adult patients and older children Awareness in whom it is possible to apply the criteria for diagnosis discussed below. 1.6 Awareness refers to the ability to have, and the having of, experience of any kind. We are typically aware of our surroundings and of bodily sensations, Wakefulness without awareness but the contents of awareness can also include our 1.2 Consciousness is an ambiguous term, encom- memories, thoughts, emotions and intentions. passing both wakefulness and awareness. This dis- Although understanding of the brain mechanisms of tinction is crucial to the concept of the vegetative awareness is incomplete, structures in the cerebral state, in which wakefulness recovers after brain hemispheres clearly play a key role. Awareness is not injury without recovery of awareness. 2–5 a single indivisible capacity: brain damage can selectively impair some aspects of awareness, leaving others intact.
    [Show full text]