DOCSLIB.ORG

Pion Charge Radius from Pion+Electron Elastic Scattering Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pion Charge Radius from Pion+Electron Elastic Scattering Data Preprint no. NJU-INP 047/21 Pion charge radius from pion+electron elastic scattering data Zhu-Fang Cuia,b, Daniele Binosic, Craig D. Robertsa,b,, Sebastian M. Schmidtd,e a School of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093, China b Institute for Nonperturbative Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093, China c European Centre for Theoretical Studies in Nuclear Physics and Related Areas, Villa Tambosi, Strada delle Tabarelle 286, I-38123 Villazzano (TN), Italy d Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden D-01314, Germany e RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut B, Aachen D-52074, Germany Abstract With the aim of extracting the pion charge radius, we analyse extant precise pion+electron elastic scattering data on Q2 2 [0:015; 0:144] GeV2 using a method based on interpolation via continued fractions augmented by statistical sampling. The scheme avoids any assumptions on the form of function used for the representation of data and subsequent extrapolation onto Q2 ' 0. Com- bining results obtained from the two available data sets, we obtain rπ = 0:640(7) fm, a value 2:4 σ below today’s commonly quoted average. The tension may be relieved by collection and similar analysis of new precise data that densely cover a domain which reaches well below Q2 = 0:015 GeV2. Considering available kaon+electron elastic scattering data sets, our analysis reveals that they contain insufficient information to extract an objective result for the charged-kaon radius, rK. New data with much improved 2 precision, low-Q reach and coverage are necessary before a sound result for rK can be recorded. Keywords: electric charge radius, emergence of mass, lepton-hadron scattering, Nambu-Goldstone bosons, pions and kaons, strong interactions in the standard model of particle physics 1. Introduction. The pion is Nature’s lightest hadron [1], with then the radius-squared is obtained via: its mass, m , known to a precision of 0:0001%. Indeed, with a π 6 d mass similar to that of the µ-lepton, the pion can seem unnat- r2 = − F (Q2) ; (1) π 2 π urally light. Realising this fact, contemporary theory explains Fπ(0) dQ Q2=0 the pion as simultaneously both a pseudoscalar bound-state of a i.e., from the slope of the form factor at Q2 = 0. Numerous light-quark and -antiquark and, in the absence of Higgs-boson model and QCD theory calculations of rπ, fπ are available, for couplings into quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the strong both physical pions and pseudoscalar mesons built from heav- interaction sector of the Standard Model of particle physics ier current-quarks; and it has been found that the product of (SM), the massless Nambu-Goldstone boson that emerges as a radius, r0− , and leptonic decay constant, f0− , for ground-state consequence of dynamical chiral symmetry breaking (DCSB). pseudoscalar mesons is practically constant on a large domain This dichotomy is readily understood so long as a symmetry- of meson mass: preserving treatment of QCD’s quantum field equations is used [2–7]. Following upon such proofs, it has become clear that f0− r0− ≈ constant j 0 ≤ m0− . 1 GeV; (2) pion observables provide the cleanest window onto the phe- nomenon of emergent hadron mass (EHM), viz. the origin of see, e.g., Refs. [16, Fig. 1], [17, Fig. 2A]. This prediction is more than 98% of visible mass in the Universe [8–12]. a manifestation of EHM as expressed in pseudoscalar meson Bethe-Salpeter wave functions. The pion was discovered more than seventy years ago [13], The most direct available empirical means to extract rπ is twelve years after its existence was first predicted [14]. Yet, in 2 measurement of Fπ(Q ) in pion+electron (πe) elastic scattering arXiv:2108.04948v1 [hep-ph] 10 Aug 2021 all this time, very little has been revealed empirically about its at low-Q2 and subsequent use of Eq. (1). Existing estimations internal structure [15]. This is largely because pions are un- of this radius are broadly compatible, but the precision is at least stable, e.g., charged pions decay via weak interactions with 10 000-times worse than that with which mπ is known. Given a strength modulated by the pion leptonic decay constant [1]: the fundamental character of the pion, e.g., its role in binding fπ = 0:0921(8) GeV. nuclei and its connections with EHM, this is unsatisfactory. mπ A simple case in point is the electric radius of the charged and rπ are also correlated [9, Fig. 2] and a SM solution will pion. With results in hand for the charged-pion elastic form deliver values for both; hence, precise values are necessary to 2 2 factor, Fπ(Q ), where Q is the momentum-transfer-squared, set solid benchmarks for theory. Data on low-Q2 πe ! πe scattering has been collected in four experiments [18–21] and today’s commonly quoted value Email addresses: [email protected] (Zhu-Fang Cui), of the pion radius [1]: [email protected] (Daniele Binosi), [email protected] (Craig D. Roberts), [email protected] (Sebastian M. Schmidt) rπ = 0:659 ± 0:004 fm; (3) Preprint submitted to Physics Letters B August 12, 2021 is obtained from the analysis of the sets in Ref. [19–21], aug- + − ! + − ��� mented by information from analyses of e e π π reac- ��������� ���� tions [22, 23]. In the past two years, this value has dropped � ��� ± ) 1:5 σ from the value quoted earlier [24]: rπ = 0:672 0:008 fm. � Following the controversy surrounding the proton charge ra- � ��� ( dius, which began ten years ago [25, 26], it is now known that π � a reliable extraction of radii from lepton+hadron scattering and | ��� the associated electric form factor requires precise data that are ��� densely packed at very-low-Q2, e.g., with an electron beam en- ��� ergy of 1:1 GeV, the PRad collaboration collected 33 proton −4 2 2 ��������� ���� form factor data on the domain 2:1 × 10 ≤ Q =GeV ≤ 0:06 � ��� ) [27]. Moreover, in analysing that data, every conceivable effort � must be made to eliminate all systematic error inherent in the � ��� ( choice of data fitting-function [28–36]. π � | ��� Importantly, a scheme is now available that avoids any spe- �������� cific choice of fitting function in analysing form factor data. ��� Refined in an array of applications to problems in hadron phy- ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� sics, particularly those which demand model-independent in- � � terpolation and extrapolation, e.g. Refs. [37–43], and typically � / ��� described as the statistical Schlessinger point method (SPM) [44, 45], the approach produces a form-unbiased interpolation Figure 1: Pion form factor data collected at CERN by the NA7 Collaboration: upper panel – [18]; lower panel – [19]. Although these data were obtained of data as the basis for a well-constrained extrapolation and, thirty-five years ago, they remain the most dense and extensive sets of low-Q2 hence, radius determination [46]. It is therefore worth recon- data available. Concerning the 1986 set [19], our analysis uses the square- sidering available low-Q2 pion form factor data with a view to within-square data; the half-shaded data only introduce noise. employing the SPM in a fresh determination of rπ. 2. Pion form factor. The most recent πe ! πe experiment vided in Ref. [46, Sec. 3]. It is characterised by a mathemati- was performed twenty years ago [21], but the densest and most cally well-defined optimal roughness penalty, which is a self- 2 extensive sets of low-Q data were collected roughly thirty-five consistent output of the smoothing procedure. Denoting the years ago at CERN by the NA7 Collaboration [18, 19]. The sets roughness penalty by , the data are untouched by smoothing are depicted in Fig.1. Within mutual uncertainties, the radius if = 0; whereas maximal smoothing is indicated by = 1, determination published in Ref. [21] agrees with those reported which returns a linear least-squares realignment of the data. In in Refs. [18, 19]; but referred to the results quoted in Ref. [19], all pion cases described herein, ' 0. the central value in Ref. [21] is more than 2σ smaller. Becoming specific, the 1984 NA7 data set has N = 30 ele- 2 Reviewing available low-Q πe ! πe data, only the sets ob- ments on 0:015 ≤ Q2=GeV2 ≤ 0:119 [18]; and the 1986 NA7 tained by the NA7 Collaboration [18, 19] are worth consider- set has N = 45 elements on 0:015 ≤ Q2=GeV2 ≤ 0:253 [19]. 2 ing for reanalysis using the SPM: the Q -coverage, density, and Preliminary SPM analysis of the latter data revealed that the precision of the data in Ref. [20] are too poor to contribute any- N = 34 lowest Q2 points (square-within-square data in Fig.1) thing beyond what is already available in the NA7 sets; and enable a robust radius determination. Including the remaining Ref. [21] does not provide pion form factor data, reporting a points (half-shaded squares in Fig.1) serves only to introduce radius instead by assuming a monopole form factor. noise; so, we omit them from our detailed analysis. 3. SPM method. Our procedure for radius extraction is de- To proceed with the statistical SPM method, we randomly tailed in Ref. [46]; so, we only recapitulate essentials. select 6 < M < N=2 elements from each of the two NA7 data The statistical SPM approach constructs a very large set of sets. In principle, this provides C(N; M) different interpolating continued fraction interpolations, each element of which cap- functions in each case, amounting to O(105 − 107) or O(106 − tures both local and global features of the curve the data are 109) possible interpolators, respectively.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Charge Radius of the Short-Lived Ni68 and Correlation with The
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 124, 132502 (2020) Charge Radius of the Short-Lived 68Ni and Correlation with the Dipole Polarizability † S. Kaufmann,1 J. Simonis,2 S. Bacca,2,3 J. Billowes,4 M. L. Bissell,4 K. Blaum ,5 B. Cheal,6 R. F. Garcia Ruiz,4,7, W. Gins,8 C. Gorges,1 G. Hagen,9 H. Heylen,5,7 A. Kanellakopoulos ,8 S. Malbrunot-Ettenauer,7 M. Miorelli,10 R. Neugart,5,11 ‡ G. Neyens ,7,8 W. Nörtershäuser ,1,* R. Sánchez ,12 S. Sailer,13 A. Schwenk,1,5,14 T. Ratajczyk,1 L. V. Rodríguez,15, L. Wehner,16 C. Wraith,6 L. Xie,4 Z. Y. Xu,8 X. F. Yang,8,17 and D. T. Yordanov15 1Institut für Kernphysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany 2Institut für Kernphysik and PRISMA+ Cluster of Excellence, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, D-55128 Mainz, Germany 3Helmholtz Institute Mainz, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany 4School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom 5Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany 6Oliver Lodge Laboratory, Oxford Street, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom 7Experimental Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland 8KU Leuven, Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium 9Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA 10TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2A3, Canada 11Institut
    [Show full text]
  • Muonic Atoms and Radii of the Lightest Nuclei
    Muonic atoms and radii of the lightest nuclei Randolf Pohl Uni Mainz MPQ Garching Tihany 10 June 2019 Outline ● Muonic hydrogen, deuterium and the Proton Radius Puzzle New results from H spectroscopy, e-p scattering ● Muonic helium-3 and -4 Charge radii and the isotope shift ● Muonic present: HFS in μH, μ3He 10x better (magnetic) Zemach radii ● Muonic future: muonic Li, Be 10-100x better charge radii ● Ongoing: Triton charge radius from atomic T(1S-2S) 400fold improved triton charge radius Nuclear rms charge radii from measurements with electrons values in fm * elastic electron scattering * H/D: laser spectroscopy and QED (a lot!) * He, Li, …. isotope shift for charge radius differences * for medium-high Z (C and above): muonic x-ray spectroscopy sources: * p,d: CODATA-2014 * t: Amroun et al. (Saclay) , NPA 579, 596 (1994) * 3,4He: Sick, J.Phys.Chem.Ref Data 44, 031213 (2015) * Angeli, At. Data Nucl. Data Tab. 99, 69 (2013) The “Proton Radius Puzzle” Measuring Rp using electrons: 0.88 fm ( +- 0.7%) using muons: 0.84 fm ( +- 0.05%) 0.84 fm 0.88 fm 5 μd 2016 CODATA-2014 4 μp 2013 5.6 σ 3 e-p scatt. μp 2010 2 H spectroscopy 1 0.83 0.84 0.85 0.86 0.87 0.88 0.89 0.9 Proton charge radius R [fm] ch μd 2016: RP et al (CREMA Coll.) Science 353, 669 (2016) μp 2013: A. Antognini, RP et al (CREMA Coll.) Science 339, 417 (2013) The “Proton Radius Puzzle” Measuring Rp using electrons: 0.88 fm ( +- 0.7%) using muons: 0.84 fm ( +- 0.05%) 0.84 fm 0.88 fm 5 μd 2016 CODATA-2014 4 μp 2013 5.6 σ 3 e-p scatt.
    [Show full text]
  • The MITP Proton Radius Puzzle Workshop
    Report on The MITP Proton Radius Puzzle Workshop June 2–6, 2014 in Waldthausen Castle, Mainz, Germany 1 Description of the Workshop The organizers of the workshop were: • Carl Carlson, William & Mary, [email protected] • Richard Hill, University of Chicago, [email protected] • Savely Karshenboim, MPI fur¨ Quantenoptik & Pulkovo Observatory, [email protected] • Marc Vanderhaeghen, Universitat¨ Mainz, [email protected] The web page of the workshop, which contains all talks, can be found at https://indico.mitp.uni-mainz.de/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=14 . The size of the proton is one of the most fundamental observables in hadron physics. It is measured through an electromagnetic form factor. The latter is directly related to the distribution of charge and magnetization of the baryon and through such imaging provides the basis of nearly all studies of the hadron structure. In very recent years, a very precise knowledge of nucleon form factors has become more and more im- portant as input for precision experiments in several fields of physics. Well known examples are the hydrogen Lamb shift and the hydrogen hyperfine splitting. The atomic physics measurements of energy level splittings reach an impressive accuracy of up to 13 significant digits. Its theoretical understanding however is far less accurate, being at the part-per-million level (ppm). The main theoretical uncertainty lies in proton structure corrections, which limits the search for new physics in these kinds of experiment. In this context, the recent PSI measurement of the proton charge radius from the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen has given a value that is a startling 4%, or 5 standard deviations, lower than the values ob- tained from energy level shifts in electronic hydrogen and from electron-proton scattering experiments, see figure below.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics Has a Core Problem
    Physics Has a Core Problem Physicists can solve many puzzles by taking more accurate and careful measurements. Randolf Pohl and his colleagues at the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics in Garching, however, actually created a new problem with their precise measurements of the proton radius, because the value they measured differs significantly from the value previously considered to be valid. The difference could point to gaps in physicists’ picture of matter. Measuring with a light ruler: Randolf Pohl and his team used laser spectroscopy to determine the proton radius – and got a surprising result. PHYSICS & ASTRONOMY_Proton Radius TEXT PETER HERGERSBERG he atmosphere at the scien- tific conferences that Ran- dolf Pohl has attended in the past three years has been very lively. And the T physicist from the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics is a good part of the reason for this liveliness: the commu- nity of experts that gathers there is working together to solve a puzzle that Pohl and his team created with its mea- surements of the proton radius. Time and time again, speakers present possible solutions and substantiate them with mathematically formulated arguments. In the process, they some- times also cast doubt on theories that for decades have been considered veri- fied. Other speakers try to find weak spots in their fellow scientists’ explana- tions, and present their own calcula- tions to refute others’ hypotheses. In the end, everyone goes back to their desks and their labs to come up with subtle new deliberations to fuel the de- bate at the next meeting. In 2010, the Garching-based physi- cists, in collaboration with an interna- tional team, published a new value for the charge radius of the proton – that is, the nucleus at the core of a hydro- gen atom.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Charge Density: a Clue from Quantum Chemistry for Quantum Foundations
    Electron Charge Density: A Clue from Quantum Chemistry for Quantum Foundations Charles T. Sebens California Institute of Technology arXiv v.2 June 24, 2021 Forthcoming in Foundations of Physics Abstract Within quantum chemistry, the electron clouds that surround nuclei in atoms and molecules are sometimes treated as clouds of probability and sometimes as clouds of charge. These two roles, tracing back to Schr¨odingerand Born, are in tension with one another but are not incompatible. Schr¨odinger'sidea that the nucleus of an atom is surrounded by a spread-out electron charge density is supported by a variety of evidence from quantum chemistry, including two methods that are used to determine atomic and molecular structure: the Hartree-Fock method and density functional theory. Taking this evidence as a clue to the foundations of quantum physics, Schr¨odinger'selectron charge density can be incorporated into many different interpretations of quantum mechanics (and extensions of such interpretations to quantum field theory). Contents 1 Introduction2 2 Probability Density and Charge Density3 3 Charge Density in Quantum Chemistry9 3.1 The Hartree-Fock Method . 10 arXiv:2105.11988v2 [quant-ph] 24 Jun 2021 3.2 Density Functional Theory . 20 3.3 Further Evidence . 25 4 Charge Density in Quantum Foundations 26 4.1 GRW Theory . 26 4.2 The Many-Worlds Interpretation . 29 4.3 Bohmian Mechanics and Other Particle Interpretations . 31 4.4 Quantum Field Theory . 33 5 Conclusion 35 1 1 Introduction Despite the massive progress that has been made in physics, the composition of the atom remains unsettled. J. J. Thomson [1] famously advocated a \plum pudding" model where electrons are seen as tiny negative charges inside a sphere of uniformly distributed positive charge (like the raisins|once called \plums"|suspended in a plum pudding).
    [Show full text]
  • S Ince the Brilliant Insights and Pioneering
    The secret life of quarks ince the brilliant insights and pioneering experiments of Geiger, S Marsden and Rutherford first revealed that atoms contain nuclei [1], nuclear physics has developed into an astoundingly rich and diverse field. We have probed the complexities of protons and nuclei in our laboratories; we have seen how nuclear processes writ large in the cosmos are key to our existence; and we have found a myriad of ways to harness the nuclear realm for energy, medical and security applications. Nevertheless, many open questions still remain in nuclear physics— the mysterious and hidden world that is the domain of quarks and gluons. 44 ) detmold mit physics annual 2017 The secret life by William of quarks Detmold The modern picture of an atom includes multiple layers of structure: atoms are composed of nuclei and electrons; nuclei are composed of protons and neutrons; and protons and neutrons are themselves composed of quarks—matter particles—that are held together by force- carrying particles called gluons. And it is the primary goal of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva, Switzerland, to investigate the tantalizing possibility that an even deeper structure exists. Despite this understanding, we are only just beginning to be able to predict the properties and interactions of nuclei from the underlying physics of quarks and gluons, as these fundamental constituents are never seen directly in experiments but always remain confined inside composite particles (hadrons), such as the proton. Recent progress in supercomputing and algorithm development has changed this, and we are rapidly approaching the point where precision calculations of the simplest nuclear processes will be possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Rpp2020-List-Pi-Plus-Minus.Pdf
    Citation: P.A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020) G P − − π± I (J ) = 1 (0 ) We have omitted some results that have been superseded by later experiments. The omitted results may be found in our 1988 edition Physics Letters B204 1 (1988). ± π± MASS The most accurate charged pion mass measurements are based upon x- − ray wavelength measurements for transitions in π -mesonic atoms. The observed line is the blend of three components, corresponding to different K-shell occupancies. JECKELMANN 94 revisits the occupancy question, with the conclusion that two sets of occupancy ratios, resulting in two dif- ferent pion masses (Solutions A and B), are equally probable. We choose the higher Solution B since only this solution is consistent with a positive mass-squared for the muon neutrino, given the precise muon momentum measurements now available (DAUM 91, ASSAMAGAN 94, and ASSAM- AGAN 96) for the decay of pions at rest. Earlier mass determinations with pi-mesonic atoms may have used incorrect K-shell screening corrections. Measurements with an error of > 0.005 MeV have been omitted from this Listing. VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 139..57039±0..00018 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.8. 139..57039±0..00017 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below. ± 1 + → + 139.57021 0.00014 DAUM 19 SPEC π µ νµ 139.57077±0.00018 2 TRASSINELLI 16 CNTR X-ray transitions in pionic N2 139.57071±0.00053 3 LENZ 98 CNTR − pionic N2-atoms gas target − 139.56995±0.00035 4 JECKELMANN94 CNTR − π atom, Soln.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleus Nucleus the Massive, Positively Charged Central Part of an Atom, Made up of Protons and Neutrons
    Madan Mohan Malaviya Univ. of Technology, Gorakhpur MPM: 203 NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS UNIT –I: Nuclei And Its Properties Lecture-4 By Prof. B. K. Pandey, Dept. of Physics and Material Science 24-10-2020 Side 1 Madan Mohan Malaviya Univ. of Technology, Gorakhpur Size of the Nucleus Nucleus the massive, positively charged central part of an atom, made up of protons and neutrons • In his experiment Rutheford observed that the light nuclei the distance of closest approach is of the order of 3x10−15 m. • The distance of closest approach, at which scattering begins to take place was identified as the measure of nuclear size. • Nuclear size is defined by nuclear radius, also called rms charge radius. It can be measured by the scattering of electrons by the nucleus. • The problem of defining a radius for the atomic nucleus is similar to the problem of atomic radius, in that neither atoms nor their nuclei have definite boundaries. 24-10-2020 Side 2 Madan Mohan Malaviya Univ. of Technology, Gorakhpur Nuclear Size • However, the nucleus can be modelled as a sphere of positive charge for the interpretation of electron scattering experiments: because there is no definite boundary to the nucleus, the electrons “see” a range of cross-sections, for which a mean can be taken. • The qualification of “rms” (for “root mean square”) arises because it is the nuclear cross-section, proportional to the square of the radius, which is determining for electron scattering. • The first estimate of a nuclear charge radius was made by Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden in 1909, under the direction of Ernest Rutherford.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1809.06478V2 [Nucl-Th] 13 Dec 2018 Zp 2 P 2 N 2 S 2 4GE (Q ) = Qpge(Q ) + Qnge(Q ) − GE(Q )
    Weak radius of the proton C. J. Horowitz1, ∗ 1Center for Exploration of Energy and Matter and Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA (Dated: December 14, 2018) The weak charge of the proton determines its coupling to the Z0 boson. The distribution of weak charge is found to be dramatically different from the distribution of electric charge. The proton's weak radius RW = 1:545 ± 0:017 fm is 80% larger than its charge radius Rch ≈ 0:84 fm because of a very large pion cloud contribution. This large weak radius can be measured with parity violating electron scattering and may provide insight into the structure of the proton, various radiative corrections, and possible strange quark contributions. The distributions of charge and magnetization provide one has, crucial insight into the structure of the proton. Hofs- tadter in the 1950s determined that the charge distribu- 2 2 Qn 2 1 2 RW = Rch + Rn − Rs : (4) tion in the proton has a significant size ≈ 0:8 fm [1], while Qp Qp experiments at Jefferson Laboratory have shown that the 2 Here the neutron charge radius squared is Rn = magnetization is distributed differently from the charge 2 2 [2{4]. More recently, an experiment with muonic hydro- −0:1148 ± 0:0035 fm [11]. Note that this Rn value is gen has found a surprising value for the charge radius of a somewhat old result that could be improved with a modern experiment. The nucleon's strangeness radius the proton Rch [5] that is smaller than previous determi- 2 nations with electron scattering or conventional hydro- squared Rs is defined, gen spectroscopy [6].
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Nuclear Properties with Muonic Atoms
    EPJ manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Study of nuclear properties with muonic atoms A. Knecht1a, A. Skawran1;2b, and S. M. Vogiatzi1;2c 1 Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland 2 Institut f¨urTeilchen- und Astrophysik, ETH Z¨urich, Switzerland Received: date / Revised version: date Abstract. Muons are a fascinating probe to study nuclear properties. Muonic atoms can easily be formed by stopping negative muons inside a material. The muon is subsequently captured by the nucleus and, due to its much higher mass compared to the electron, orbits the nucleus at very small distances. During this atomic capture process the muon emits characteristic X-rays during its cascade down to the ground state. The energies of these X-rays reveal the muonic energy level scheme, from which properties like the nuclear charge radius or its quadrupole moment can be extracted. While almost all stable elements have been examined using muons, probing highly radioactive atoms has so far not been possible. The muX experiment has developed a technique based on transfer reaction inside a high pressure hydrogen/deuterium gas cell to examine targets available only in microgram quantities. PACS. 14.60. Ef Muons { 36.10.Dr Positronium, muonium, muonic atoms and molecules { 32.30.Rj X-ray spectra { 21.10.-k General and average properties of nuclei 1 Introduction Muons are fascinating particles with experiments being conducted in the context of particle, nuclear and atomic physics [1]. Additionally, also applied research is possible by measuring the spin precession and dynamics of muons inside materials through the µSR technique [2] thus probing the internal magnetic fields of the sample under study.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamb Shift in Muonic Hydrogen the Proton Radius Puzzle Muonic News Muonic Deuterium and Helium Muonic Hydrogen and Deuterium
    Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen The Proton Radius Puzzle Muonic news Muonic deuterium and helium Muonic hydrogen and deuterium Randolf Pohl Randolf Pohl Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Quantenoptik Garching 1 7.9 p 2013 electron avg. scatt. JLab p 2010 scatt. Mainz H spectroscopy 0.83 0.84 0.85 0.86 0.87 0.88 0.89 0.9 Proton charge radius R [fm] There is the muon g-2 puzzle. RandolfPohl LeptonMoments,July222014 2 ––––––––––––––––There is the muon g-2 puzzle. RandolfPohl LeptonMoments,July222014 2 There are TWO muon puzzles. RandolfPohl LeptonMoments,July222014 2 Two muon puzzles • Anomalous magnetic moment of the muon ∼ 3.6σ J. Phys. G 38, 085003 (2011). RandolfPohl LeptonMoments,July222014 3 Two muon puzzles • Anomalous magnetic moment of the muon ∼ 3.6σ • Proton radius from muonic hydrogen RandolfPohl LeptonMoments,July222014 3 Two muon puzzles • Anomalous magnetic moment of the muon ∼ 3.6σ • Proton radius from muonic hydrogen ∼ 7.9σ The measured value of the proton rms charge radius from muonic hydrogen µ p is 10 times more accurate, but 4% smaller than the value from both hydrogen spectroscopy and elastic electron proton scattering. 7.9 σ µp 2013 electron avg. scatt. JLab µp 2010 scatt. Mainz H spectroscopy 0.83 0.84 0.85 0.86 0.87 0.88 0.89 0.9 Proton charge radius R [fm] ch RP et al., Nature 466, 213 (2010); Science 339, 417 (2013); ARNPS 63, 175 (2013). RandolfPohl LeptonMoments,July222014 3 Two muon puzzles • Anomalous magnetic moment of the muon ∼ 3.6σ • Proton radius from muonic hydrogen ∼ 7.9σ • These 2 discrepancies may be connected.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics SPA5302, 2019 Chris Clarkson, School of Physics & Astronomy [email protected]
    Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics SPA5302, 2019 Chris Clarkson, School of Physics & Astronomy [email protected] These notes are evolving, so please let me know of any typos, factual errors etc. They will be updated weekly on QM+ (and may include updates to early parts we have already covered). Note that material in purple ‘Digression’ boxes is not examinable. Updated 16:29, on 05/12/2019. Contents 1 Basic Nuclear Properties4 1.1 Length Scales, Units and Dimensions............................7 2 Nuclear Properties and Models8 2.1 Nuclear Radius and Distribution of Nucleons.......................8 2.1.1 Scattering Cross Section............................... 12 2.1.2 Matter Distribution................................. 18 2.2 Nuclear Binding Energy................................... 20 2.3 The Nuclear Force....................................... 24 2.4 The Liquid Drop Model and the Semi-Empirical Mass Formula............ 26 2.5 The Shell Model........................................ 33 2.5.1 Nuclei Configurations................................ 44 3 Radioactive Decay and Nuclear Instability 48 3.1 Radioactive Decay...................................... 49 CONTENTS CONTENTS 3.2 a Decay............................................. 56 3.2.1 Decay Mechanism and a calculation of t1/2(Q) .................. 58 3.3 b-Decay............................................. 62 3.3.1 The Valley of Stability................................ 64 3.3.2 Neutrinos, Leptons and Weak Force........................ 68 3.4 g-Decay...........................................
    [Show full text]