DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 32 Evaluation Report Consideration of Alternatives, Benefits and Costs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 32 Evaluation Report Consideration of Alternatives, Benefits and Costs Section 32 Evaluation Report Consideration of alternatives, benefits and costs Proposed Otago Regional Policy Statement 2021 This Section 32 Evaluation Report should be read in conjunction with the Proposed Otago Regional Policy Statement 2021 May 2021 Section 32 Evaluation Report – Proposed Otago Regional Policy Statement 2021 May 2021 Table of contents Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Structure ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.3. Background ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.4. Requirements of section 32 of the RMA ............................................................................ 6 2. Development and consultation ........................................................................................... 8 2.1. Iwi involvement .................................................................................................................. 8 2.2. Phases 1 and 2: January to March 2020 ........................................................................... 11 2.3. Phase 3: June – August 2020 ............................................................................................ 12 2.4. Phase 4: Freshwater visions consultation ........................................................................ 13 2.5. Phase 5: RMA pre-notification consultation .................................................................... 14 3. Issues ............................................................................................................................... 17 3.1. Significant resource management issues for the region .................................................. 17 3.2. Resource management issues of significance to iwi authorities...................................... 18 4. Evaluation of objectives .................................................................................................... 22 4.1. Methodology .................................................................................................................... 22 4.2. Status quo ......................................................................................................................... 22 4.3. Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 23 4.4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 61 5. Evaluation of provisions.................................................................................................... 63 5.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 63 5.2. Limitations ........................................................................................................................ 63 5.3. MW – Mana whenua ........................................................................................................ 64 5.4. IM – Integrated management .......................................................................................... 69 5.5. AIR – Air ............................................................................................................................ 80 5.6. CE – Coastal environment ................................................................................................ 89 5.7. LF – Land and fresh water .............................................................................................. 104 5.8. ECO – Ecosystems and indigenous biodiversity ............................................................. 126 5.9. EIT – Energy, infrastructure, and transport .................................................................... 138 5.10. HAZ – Hazards and risks .............................................................................................. 163 5.11. HCV – Historical and cultural values ........................................................................... 177 5.12. NFL – Natural features and landscapes ...................................................................... 188 5.13. UFD – Urban form and development .......................................................................... 195 Section 32 Evaluation Report – Proposed Otago Regional Policy Statement 2021 May 2021 6. Planning context ............................................................................................................ 207 6.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 207 6.2. Resource Management Act 1991: Part 2 (Purpose and Principles) .............................. 207 6.3. Resource Management Act 1991: Functions of ORC ..................................................... 209 6.4. New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 2010 (NZCPS) ................................................... 210 6.5. National policy statements ............................................................................................. 212 6.6. National planning standards .......................................................................................... 223 6.7. Regulations (including National Environmental Standards)........................................... 223 6.8. Water Conservation (Kawarau) Order 1997 (Kawarau WCO) ........................................ 228 6.9. Lake Wanaka Preservation Act 1973 .............................................................................. 229 6.10. Iwi Management Plans ................................................................................................ 229 6.11. Planning document prepared under the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 231 6.12. Other Management Plans and Strategies ................................................................... 231 6.13. Relevant entry on the New Zealand Heritage List/Rārangi Kōrero ............................. 232 6.14. Regulations relating to fisheries resources ................................................................. 232 6.15. Adjacent regional policy statements .......................................................................... 232 6.16. Exclusive Economic Zone regulations ......................................................................... 233 7. References ..................................................................................................................... 234 8. Appendices .................................................................................................................... 237 Section 32 Evaluation Report – Proposed Otago Regional Policy Statement 2021 May 2021 Abbreviations Air Plan Regional Plan: Air for Otago CDC Clutha District Council CMA Coastal marine area Coast Plan Regional Plan: Coast for Otago FMU Freshwater Management Unit HSNO Act Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 HSW Act Health and Safety at Work 2015 LWRP Land and Water Regional Plan NES National Environmental Standard NESAQ National Environmental Standards for Air Quality 2004 NESCS National Environmental Standards for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health 2011 NESETA National Environmental Standard for Electricity Transmission Activities 2009 NESF National Environmental Standards for Freshwater 2020 NESMA National Environmental Standards for Marine Aquaculture 2020 NESPF National Environmental Standards for Plantation Forestry 2017 NESHDW National Environmental Standard for Sources of Human Drinking Water 2007 NESTF National Environmental Standards for Telecommunication Facilities 2008 NOF National Objectives Framework NPS National Policy Statement NPSET National Policy Statement on Electricity Transmission 2008 NPSFM National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020 NPSREG National Policy Statement for Renewable Electricity Generation 2011 NPSUD National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 NTCSA Ngāi Tahu Claims Settlement Act 1998 NZCPS New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 2010 ORC Otago Regional Council PORPS 2019 Partially Operative Regional Policy Statement 2019 PORPS 2021 Proposed Otago Regional Policy Statement 2021 RLAA Resource Legislation Amendment Act 2017 RPS Regional Policy Statement 1 RPS 1998 Regional Policy Statement for Otago 1998 RMA Resource Management Act 1991 TAs Territorial authorities: Central Otago District Council, Clutha District Council, Dunedin City Council, Queenstown-Lakes District Council and Waitaki District Council Waste Plan Regional Plan: Waste for Otago Water Plan Regional Plan: Water for Otago Section 32 Evaluation Report – Proposed Otago Regional Policy Statement 2021 May 2021 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose 1. The Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) requires councils, when proposing new plans or policy statements, or changes to plans or policy statements, to prepare an evaluation report in accordance with section 32 of the RMA. The purpose of this report is to set out the evaluation that ORC has undertaken of the Proposed Otago
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Te Runanga 0 Ngai Tahu Traditional Role of the Rona!Sa
    :I: Mouru Pasco Maaka, who told him he was the last Maaka. In reply ::I: William told Aritaku that he had an unmerried sister Ani, m (nee Haberfield, also Metzger) in Murihiku. Ani and Aritaku met and went on to marry. m They established themselves in the area of Waimarama -0 and went on to have many children. -a o Mouru attended Greenhills Primary School and o ::D then moved on to Southland Girls' High School. She ::D showed academic ability and wanted to be a journalist, o but eventually ended up developing photographs. The o -a advantage of that was that today we have heaps of -a beautiful photos of our tlpuna which we regard as o priceless taolsa. o ::D Mouru went on to marry Nicholas James Metzger ::D in 1932. Nick's grandfather was German but was o educated in England before coming to New Zealand. o » Their first son, Nicholas Graham "Tiny" was born the year » they were married. Another child did not follow until 1943. -I , around home and relished the responsibility. She Mouru had had her hopes pinned on a dainty little girl 2S attended Raetihi School and later was a boarder at but instead she gave birth to a 13lb 40z boy called Gary " James. Turakina Maori Girls' College in Marton. She learnt the teachings of both the Ratana and Methodist churches. Mouru went to her family's tlU island Pikomamaku­ In 1944 Ruruhira took up a position at Te Rahui nui almost every season of her life. She excelled at Wahine Methodist Hostel for Maori girls in Hamilton cooking - the priest at her funeral remarked that "she founded by Princess Te Puea Herangi.
    [Show full text]
  • Data and Information Committee Agenda 9 June 2021 - Agenda
    Data and Information Committee Agenda 9 June 2021 - Agenda Data and Information Committee Agenda 9 June 2021 Meeting is held in the Council Chamber, Level 2, Philip Laing House 144 Rattray Street, Dunedin Members: Hon Cr Marian Hobbs, Co-Chair Cr Michael Laws Cr Alexa Forbes, Co-Chair Cr Kevin Malcolm Cr Hilary Calvert Cr Andrew Noone Cr Michael Deaker Cr Gretchen Robertson Cr Carmen Hope Cr Bryan Scott Cr Gary Kelliher Cr Kate Wilson Senior Officer: Sarah Gardner, Chief Executive Meeting Support: Liz Spector, Committee Secretary 09 June 2021 02:00 PM Agenda Topic Page 1. APOLOGIES No apologies were received prior to publication of the agenda. 2. PUBLIC FORUM No requests to address the Committee under Public Forum were received prior to publication of the agenda. 3. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Note: Any additions must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting. 4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Members are reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have. 5. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 3 Minutes of previous meetings will be considered true and accurate records, with or without changes. 5.1 Minutes of the 10 March 2021 Data and Information Committee meeting 3 6. OUTSTANDING ACTIONS OF DATA AND INFORMATION COMMITTEE RESOLUTIONS 8 Outstanding actions from resolutions of the Committee will be reviewed. 6.1 Action Register at 9 June 2021 8 7. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 9 1 Data and Information Committee Agenda 9 June 2021 - Agenda 7.1 OTAGO GREENHOUSE GAS PROFILE FY2018/19 9 This report is provided to present the Committee with the Otago Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory FY2018/19 and report.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission from the Canterbury District Health Board on The
    CDHB Consultation Submission to Hurunui draft Local Alcohol Policy 2013 Submission from Canterbury District Health Board (Community and Public Health (CPH) Division on behalf of the whole of Canterbury DHB) And incorporating the submission from the Medical Officer of Health for Canterbury, Dr. Alistair Humphrey July 2013 Hurunui District Council’s draft Local Alcohol Policy 2013 1 CDHB Consultation Submission to Hurunui draft Local Alcohol Policy 2013 SUBMISSION DETAILS This document covers the Canterbury District Health Board’s (CDHB) written submission on Hurunui’s District Council’s (HDC) draft Local Alcohol Policy and it is the combination of multiple inputs from across the service including the Medical Officer of Health for Canterbury, Dr. Alistair Humphrey. The CDHB as a whole represents over 8300 employees across a diverse range of services. Every division of the CDHB is affected by alcohol misuse and alcohol-related harm. The CDHB response is based on extensive evidence for alcohol-related harm. It is important that evidence-based submissions are given a higher weighting than those based on opinion or hearsay in the final formulation of the Local Alcohol Policy. There are important evidence based issues, clinical issues and public health issues which need to be articulated by the CDHB and therefore requests two slots at the hearings . Name: Alistair Humphrey Organisation Name: Canterbury District Health Board Organisation Role: Medical Officer of Health for Canterbury Contact Address: Community & Public Health, PO Box 1475, Christchurch Postcode: 8140 Note: Please contact Stuart Dodd for correspondence (same physical address) as followss ee over for full contact details Phone Number (day): 03 379 6852 (day/evening): 027 65 66 554* preferred number Email: [email protected]* preferred email continued over….
    [Show full text]
  • To View the Digital Edition of Waterlines for Spring 2020
    White background Rural Otago’s update Spring 2020 What's inside? Lake Dunstan Update on EPA Everyday water heroes notified plan A joined-up approach to catchment groups in Otago Catchment groups new and old will soon have more organisational and administrative support, which means more time for their members to do great things for Otago waterways. Catchment group leaders in Otago are Group made up of staff and councillors, “This initiative will support engaged establishing an umbrella organisation to catchment group representatives and a landowners to achieve environmental support existing catchment groups and regional coordinator from NZ Landcare outcomes specific to their area. help new ones get off the ground. Trust. “Providing coordination and The initiative will provide organisational The Advisory Group’s goal is to create administrative support, along with support for catchment groups and and support an Otago-wide network of information sharing and connecting with volunteers, help groups secure catchment groups that are addressing all stakeholders, will allow landowners funding, provide administration and water quality and waterway health, now to concentrate on achieving on-the- communication support, and facilitate and for generations to come. ground outcomes. access to experts, information and Using the money, ORC is helping the “Lyndon Strang from North Otago technology. catchment groups to establish an Sustainable Land Management (NOSLaM) Over time, it will also look to establish incorporated society. The incorporated is the establishment chairperson long-term funding pipelines to support society will employ a fulltime regional and there is representation across changing needs, and act as a conduit coordinator and contract more localised all of Otago.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanmer Springs
    Survey of business owner/managers’ perceptions of outdoor smokefree areas: Hanmer Springs July 2017 Survey and report prepared by: Cancer Society, Canterbury-West Coast division Information Team, Community & Public Health, Canterbury District Health Board Executive summary Introduction Community support for smokefree outdoor areas is well documented, however, there is little local data on tourism-related business owner/manager’s perceptions of smoking, smokefree policy and smokefree outdoor areas. The aim of this survey was to gauge tourism industry views on these issues to guide the Cancer Society’s advocacy work with the Hurunui District Council (HDC). Methods A survey of owner/managers of tourism-related businesses in Hanmer Springs was conducted in February and March 2017. Forty-two owner/managers representing 44 businesses completed a face- to-face or telephone interviewer-administered questionnaire. Main findings More than three-quarters of respondents thought that outdoor dining/seating areas should be smokefree. Forty-six percent of respondents thought that smokefree outdoor dining should be introduced using a voluntary policy, while the remaining 54 percent thought that it should be introduced using a regulated local policy. Most respondents stated that they would be more likely to support smokefree outdoor areas if there was evidence of success where smokefree outdoor areas were in place, and customer, community and council support for smokefree outdoor areas. Forty-one percent of respondents thought that introducing more smokefree outdoor areas in Hanmer Springs would have a positive impact on tourism, and 43% thought that it would make no difference. Most respondents (88.1%) stated that they would support a smokefree main street in Hanmer Springs.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Tai O Arai Te Uru (The Otago Coast)
    Te Tai o Arai Te Uru (The Otago Coast) An environmental education resource kit for schools planning a visit to: • Katiki (Moeraki peninsula) • Matakaea (Shag Point) • Huriawa (Karitane peninsula) 1 2 CONTENTS Using this resource 4 Tradition of the Arai Te Uru 7 Katiki: site information 10 Matakaea (Shag Point): site information 13 Huriawa: site information 15 Site Activities 17 Activity 1: Charting movements 20 Activity 2: Preserving food 22 Activity 3: All at sea 23 Activity 4: Nature awareness treasure hunt 24 Activity 5: Signs ans seals 25 Activity 6: Global threats, local environments 26 Activity 7: Selecting a site 27 Related Resources (including websites) 28 3 USING THIS RESOURCE This resource kit is part of a Department of Conservation and Kai Tahu ki Araiteuru initiative to encourage teachers to plan exciting and educational learning experiences on three key sites on the Otago coast (Te Tai o Arai Te Uru) that have special cultural and conservation values to all New Zealanders. The sites are all prominent headlands – Katiki (Moeraki peninsula), Matakaea (Shag Point) and Huriawa (Karitane Peninsula) – strategic strongholds occupied by Maori for hundreds of years. Archaeological evidence of occupation dates back to the 12th Century. Since the Käi Claims Settlement Act of 1998, all three sites are managed in partnership between the Department of Conservation and Te Runanga o Käi Tahu. The Crown also formally recognised Matakaea’s special cultural, spiritual and historic significance of matakaea for Käi Tahu, by designating it as a topuni. In the southern Kai Tahu dialect, The concept derives from the Käi Tahu tikanga (custom) of rangatira (chiefs) ‘ng’ is often replaced by ‘k’.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Meeting Agenda - 25 November 2020 - Agenda
    Council Meeting Agenda - 25 November 2020 - Agenda Council Meeting Agenda - 25 November 2020 Meeting will be held in the Council Chamber, Level 2, Philip Laing House 144 Rattray Street, Dunedin Members: Cr Andrew Noone, Chairperson Cr Carmen Hope Cr Michael Laws, Deputy Chairperson Cr Gary Kelliher Cr Hilary Calvert Cr Kevin Malcolm Cr Michael Deaker Cr Gretchen Robertson Cr Alexa Forbes Cr Bryan Scott Hon Cr Marian Hobbs Cr Kate Wilson Senior Officer: Sarah Gardner, Chief Executive Meeting Support: Liz Spector, Committee Secretary 25 November 2020 01:00 PM Agenda Topic Page 1. APOLOGIES Cr Deaker and Cr Hobbs have submitted apologies. 2. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Note: Any additions must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting. 3. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Members are reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have. 4. PUBLIC FORUM Members of the public may request to speak to the Council. 4.1 Mr Bryce McKenzie has requested to speak to the Council about the proposed Freshwater Regulations. 5. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 4 The Council will consider minutes of previous Council Meetings as a true and accurate record, with or without changes. 5.1 Minutes of the 28 October 2020 Council Meeting 4 6. ACTIONS (Status of Council Resolutions) 12 The Council will review outstanding resolutions. 7. MATTERS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 14 1 Council Meeting Agenda - 25 November 2020 - Agenda 7.1 CURRENT RESPONSIBILITIES IN RELATION TO DRINKING WATER 14 This paper is provided to inform the Council on Otago Regional Council’s (ORC) current responsibilities in relation to drinking water.
    [Show full text]
  • North and Coastal Otago
    North and Coastal Otago NorthWater quality,and macroinvertebrates, Coastal Otago algae, Waterfish, quality, instream macroinvertebrates, habitat and river algae,flow fish, instream habitat and river flow July 2009 to June 2010 July 2009 to June 2010 Key points Between July 2009 and June 2010, the Water quality Otago Regional Council (ORC) monitored • Half the sites were classified 14 river and stream sites in the northern as very good and none as and coastal areas of Otago to assess the poor. current state of water quality. Sites were classified using a water quality index, and • Dunedin’s urban streams the results are shown in the map below. had high concentrations of nutrients and bacteria. • Fish species diversity averaged 7.2 species per site, which was higher than the Otago average of 5.96 species per site • Mean annual low flows were up to 80% lower than normal. • Macroinvertebrate diversity was highest in the Catlins River Water quality index ORC uses a water quality index (WQI) to report water quality. The index is derived from median values of six indicator variables: turbidity, dissolved oxygen (% saturation), ammoniacal nitrogen (NH4), nitrite-nitrate Very All six values comply nitrogen (NNN), dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP), Good with guideline values Good Five median and Escherichia coli (E.coli) values comply bacteria. Fair Three or four median values comply Median values of the six Poor Two or fewer values are compared with median ANZECC (2000) and MfE/MoH values comply with (2003) guidelines, enabling guideline values classification of water quality into one of the four groups. Water quality references Water quality • Australian and New Zealand Selected water quality indicators are displayed in the graphs and discussed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Karitane's Contribution to Public Health in New
    INTRODUCTION: KARITANE’S CONTRIBUTION TO PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW SOUTH WALES 1923-2000 Karitane is a society incorporated in NSW that commenced operation as the Australian Mothercraft Society (AMS) Plunket System in 1923, and become the Karitane Mothercraft Society (KMS) in 1970. Like the Plunket Society in New Zealand that it was modelled after, Karitane’s activities have always been connected with assisting mothers in the care and feeding of their babies. Karitane is an unusual name for an organisation in New South Wales (NSW); not immediately identifiable with either Australia’s British heritage or its Aboriginal culture. Some people in New South Wales will know that the name hails from a small peninsula on the coast of Otago in New Zealand’s South Island and may even identify it with Sir Truby King. The King family had a holiday cottage at Karitane and the name was adopted for the mothercraft homes set up by New Zealand’s Plunket Society in the main towns.1 Thesis and rationale This thesis is about Karitane’s part in the history of public health in NSW from the perspective of the development of mother and baby welfare services, an area of concern for the State’s public health authorities throughout the twentieth century. It examines how and why Karitane, a voluntary organisation, developed its services in NSW from 1923 to 2000; what did Karitane contribute to mother and baby welfare in that period? The main justification for the study was a paucity of information about Karitane in the literature on the development of mothercraft services in NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolating Madness: Photographs from Seacliff Lunatic Asylum, 1887-1907
    Isolating Madness: Photographs from Seacliff Lunatic Asylum, 1887-1907 Elizabeth Laing For my mum, thank you for taking me to the museum. A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History Victoria University of Wellington 2014 For my mum, thank you for taking me to the museum. Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the access granted by the Southern District Health Board, and the assistance of staff from the Archives New Zealand branch in Dunedin. I would particularly like to acknowledge Vivienne Cuff, who ably facilitated my research during my visits to the reading room, and patiently responded to all of my subsequent enquiries. As an agreed condition of access, I have concealed the identities of the patients discussed by using pseudonyms. I would like to sincerely thank my supervisor, Geoffrey Batchen, whose conversations and steadfast support inspired this thesis in countless ways. I hope that it meets with his approval. Abstract Frederic Truby King (1858-1938) is an eminent figure in New Zealand history. His name continues to flourish in contemporary society, due in part to its affiliation with the Royal New Zealand Plunket Society. However, the general populace is still relatively unaware of the time that King spent employed as the medical superintendent of Seacliff Lunatic Asylum, on the remote outskirts of Dunedin. The prevailing image of King during this period is of a single-minded physician, whose career was in a state of acceleration towards the establishment of Plunket.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission on Hurunui District Council Draft Long Term Plan 2018-2028
    Submission on Hurunui District Council Draft Long Term Plan 2018-2028 To: Hurunui District Council Submitter: Community & Public Health A division of the Canterbury District Health Board Attn: Kirsty Peel Community and Public Health C/- Canterbury District Health Board PO Box 1475 Christchurch 8140 Proposal: Hurunui District Council is consulting on their long-term plan to ascertain views on how best to manage infrastructure and services in the district over the next 10 years. Page 1 of 7 Template File Pathway: Y:\CFS\CPHGroups\RMC\HDC\LTP\2018\HurunuiLTPSubmissionFINAL180503.docx SUBMISSION ON HURUNUI DISTRICT COUNCIL DRAFT LONG TERM PLAN Details of submitter 1. Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB) 2. The CDHB is responsible for promoting the reduction of adverse environmental effects on the health of people and communities and to improve, promote and protect their health pursuant to the New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act 2000 and the Health Act 1956. 3. These statutory obligations are the responsibility of the Ministry of Health and, in the Canterbury District, are carried out under contract by Community and Public Health under Crown funding agreements on behalf of the Canterbury District Health Board. General comments 4. Health and wellbeing (overall quality of life) is influenced by a wide range of factors beyond the health sector. These influences can be described as the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age, and are impacted by environmental, social and behavioural factors. They are often referred to as the ‘social determinants of health1. Barton and Grant’s Health Map2 shows how various influences on health are complex and interlinked.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Hazards of the Dunedin City District
    Coastal hazards of the Dunedin City District Review of Dunedin City District Plan—Natural Hazards Otago Regional Council Private Bag 1954, Dunedin 9054 70 Stafford Street, Dunedin 9016 Phone 03 474 0827 Fax 03 479 0015 Freephone 0800 474 082 www.orc.govt.nz © Copyright for this publication is held by the Otago Regional Council. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part, provided the source is fully and clearly acknowledged. ISBN 978-0-478-37678-4 Report writers: Michael Goldsmith, Manager Natural Hazards Alex Sims, Natural Hazards Analyst Published June 2014 Cover image: Karitane and Waikouaiti Beach Coastal hazards of the Dunedin City District i Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Overview ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Scope ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3. Describing natural hazards in coastal communities .......................................................... 2 1.4. Mapping Natural Hazard Areas ........................................................................................ 5 1.5. Coastal hazard areas ...................................................................................................... 5 1.6. Uncertainty of mapped coastal hazard areas ..................................................................
    [Show full text]