DOCSLIB.ORG

7 Review of Diadromous Fish Distribution in the Upper Thomson River System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
7 Review of Diadromous Fish Distribution in the Upper Thomson River System 7 Review of diadromous fish distribution in the upper Thomson River system W. Koster and T.A. Raadik 2010 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Client Report Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Client Report Review of diadromous fish distribution in the upper Thomson River system W. Koster and T.A. Raadik Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 2010 Arthur Rylah Inst itute for Environmental Research Department of Sustainability and Environment Heidelberg, Victoria Report produced by: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Sustainability and Environment PO Box 137 Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Phone (03) 9450 8600 Website: www.dse.vic.gov.au/ari © State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment 2010 This publication is copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , no part may be reproduced, copied, transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical or graphic) without the prior written permission of the State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment. All requests and enquiries should be directed to the Customer Service Centre, 136 186 or email [email protected] Citation: Koster, W. and Raadik, T.A. 2010. Review of diadromous fish distribution in the upper Thomson River system. Report to West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Heidelberg, Victoria (unpublished). Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Front cover photo: Australian Grayling (Tarmo A. Raadik) and upper Thomson River (Wayne Koster). Authorised by: Victorian Government, Melbourne Printed by: Snap Printing, Heidelberg Contents Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................v Summary............................................................................................................................................1 1 Background .............................................................................................................................3 2 Distribution of Australian Grayling and other diadromous fish in the upper Thomson River system.......................................................................................................................................4 Australian Grayling ( Prototroctes maraena ) ......................................................................................5 Lampreys ( Mordacia mordax and Geotria australis ) ........................................................................5 Eels ( Anguilla australis and A. reinhardtii )........................................................................................6 Broad-finned Galaxias ( Galaxias brevipinnis )....................................................................................6 Common Galaxias ( Galaxias maculatus ) ...........................................................................................7 Australian Bass ( Macquaria novemaculeata ).....................................................................................7 Tupong ( Pseudaphritis urvillii )...........................................................................................................8 3 Factors impeding the distribution of Australian Grayling and other diadromous fish in the upper Thomson River system ....................................................................................................9 4 Restoring connectivity of fish passage for Australian Grayling and other diadromous fish in the upper Thomson River system.......................................................................................12 5 Conclusions and recommendations.....................................................................................15 iii iv Acknowledgements The West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority (WGCMA) funded this project. Thanks to David Stork from WGCMA for his role in the coordination of the project. David Crook, Jason Lieschke, Jeremy Hindell and Matthew Jones from the Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research (ARI) provided valuable comments on an earlier version of this document. Thanks to David Dawson from ARI for his assistance in collating fish distribution data. v vi Review of diadromous fish distribution in the upper Thomson River system Summary This report documents the findings of a review of the distributions of diadromous fish in the upper Thomson River system in West Gippsland. Diadromous fish undertake migrations between freshwater and marine environments and comprise about 70% of the native freshwater fish species in the Thomson River system. They are currently considered to be confined largely to the lower and mid reaches (Hall 1989, Raadik 1996, Koster and Crowther 2003). Specifically, the aim of this project was to determine the distributions of the nationally threatened Australian Grayling ( Prototroctes maraena ) and other diadromous fish species in the upper Thomson and Aberfeldy rivers, and identify, where possible, any factors potentially impeding diadromous fish distribution, based on a review of fish survey data and published and grey literature (including technical reports). The results of this review indicate that Australian Grayling and most other diadromous fish species in the Thomson River system are confined to the lower and mid reaches. Exceptions include eels and lampreys, which are capable of climbing over barriers. Based on historic, current and potential distributions of diadromous fish species, including comparisons with the fish communities present in nearby catchments (e.g. Mitchell, Tambo, Snowy), Australian Grayling and several other diadromous fish species should be found in the upper reaches of the system. A range of factors are potentially impacting diadromous fish distribution in the mid to upper Thomson River. The Thomson Dam has modified the hydrology and water temperature of the river, which could result in the loss or disruption of important biological cues (e.g. high flows) for fish migrating into the system or throughout the river (TMEFT 2004). Issues with coldwater releases have been alleviated to some degree by the use of a multi-level offtake to maintain release water temperatures within target levels. The presence in the upper Thomson River of the diadromous Short-finned Eel ( Anguilla australis ), Long-finned Eel (Anguilla reinhardtii ) and lampreys ( Mordacia mordax , Geotria australis ) suggests that suitable migration/attraction cues (i.e. flows) exist in the upper reaches. The presence of self-sustaining populations of non- migratory native fish species (e.g. Southern Pygmy Perch Nannoperca australis , River Blackfish Gadopsis marmoratus , Australian smelt Retropinna semoni ) in the Thomson River below the dam also indicates that water temperature and flow are not preventing the establishment of fish populations in the upper Thomson River and that native fish are able to survive in this reach. The degree of impact of recent fires on fish habitat in the upper Thomson River catchment is unknown, but is not likely to be a major cause of the lack of diadromous fish species in that part of the system. Given that diadromous fishes in south-eastern Australia typically undertake annual upstream migrations from marine environments into rivers, and different species migrate at different times, at least some diadromous fish species should be present at any given time. Even if habitat was extremely unsuitable, small numbers of fish would be present, replaced by new recruits (Lyon and O’Connor 2008). Surveys conducted in the Thomson River since the fires have collected the diadromous species Australian Grayling, Tupong (Pseudaphritis urvillii ) and Common Galaxias (Galaxias maculatus ) at various sites in areas that were burnt (e.g. Coopers Creek, C5 Track, Bruntons Bridge), but not from sites upstream of the Horseshoe Bend Tunnel. The Horseshoe Bend Tunnel on the upper Thomson River has been identified in the Victorian State Fishway Program as a barrier to fish movement (McGuckin and Bennett 1999). The tunnel was constructed in 1911–12 with most of the river flow diverted through the tunnel and bypassing the one kilometre reach of the Thomson River known as Horseshoe Bend (LCC 1991). Opportunities for fish to migrate through the old river channel are limited, as the flow in the channel is estimated to occur about 3% of the time (Koster and Crowther 2003). In contrast, diadromous fishes in south-eastern Australia migrate over an extensive time frame encompassing Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Client Report 1 Review of diadromous fish distribution in the upper Thomson River system much of the year (Koehn and O’Connor 1990). Migration of fish through the tunnel would also be impeded, particularly by steep gradients and sudden drops in height. Water velocities within the tunnel (1.2–6.2 m/sec) are also known to far exceed the swimming capabilities of small diadromous fishes (Saddlier and O’Connor 1997, Boubee et al. 1999). Natural light within
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rivers Monitoring and Evaluation Plan V1.0 2020
    i Rivers Monitoring and Evaluation Plan V1.0 2020 Contents Acknowledgement to Country ................................................................................................ 1 Contributors ........................................................................................................................... 1 Abbreviations and acronyms .................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 Background and context ........................................................................................................ 3 About the Rivers MEP ............................................................................................................. 7 Part A: PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................... 18 Habitat ................................................................................................................................. 24 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................ 29 Engaged communities .......................................................................................................... 45 Community places ................................................................................................................ 54 Water for the environment ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thomson River-Rainbow Creek
    WEST GIPPSLAND CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY Thomson River-Rainbow Creek Waterway Management Plan 2020 Acknowledgements The Thomson Rainbow Waterway Management Plan was co-developed through the collective effort of a number of individuals and organisations, including: • Project Working Group members: Cr. Carolyn Crossley (Chair), Trevor Astbury, Norm Drew, Beverly Hookey, Merv Whittaker, Phil Taylor, Malcolm Stewart and representatives from Gippsland Water, Wellington Shire Council, Gunaikurnai Land and Waters Aboriginal Corporation, Southern Rural Water and the West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority • Project Steering Committee members: Southern Rural Water and the West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority • Project Team: Natural Decisions (Geoff Park and Anna Roberts), Blue Sense Consulting (Michelle Dickson), Professor Ian Rutherfurd, and Water Technology (consulting support) • Interested community members and landholders who participated in community forums and the supporting studies for this plan. Acknowledgement of Country The West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority would like to acknowledge and pay our respects to the Traditional Land Owners of the Thomson – Rainbow Creek area, the Gunaikurnai people. We also recognise the contribution of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and organisations in land and natural resource management. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority (WGCMA) and its consultants and employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purpose. The mapping and modelling outputs represented in this Plan are not definitive and provided for indicative purposes only. It therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Reintroduction Plan for the Purple- Spotted Gudgeon in the Southern Murray–Darling Basin
    Reintroduction plan for the Purple- spotted Gudgeon in the southern Murray–Darling Basin Photo: Arthur Mostead Authors - Michael Hammer, Thomas Barnes, Leanne Piller & Dylan Sortino Aquasave Consultants, Adelaide Published by Murray–Darling Basin Authority. MDBA Publication No 45/12 ISBN 978-1-922068-54-5 (online) © Murray–Darling Basin Authority for and on behalf of the Commonwealth of Australia, 2012. With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the MDBA logo, all photographs, graphics and trademarks, this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au The MDBA’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Title: Reintroduction Plan for the Southern Purple-spotted Gudgeon in the southern Murray— Darling Basin Source: Licensed from the Murray–Darling Basin Authority, under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. Authors: Michael Hammer, Thomas Barnes, Leanne Pillar and Dylan Sortino. Editor: Jane Tuckwell The MDBA provides this information in good faith but to the extent permitted by law, the MDBA and the Commonwealth exclude all liability for adverse consequences arising directly or indirectly from using any information or material contained within this publication. Cover Image: Lower Murray Southern Purple-spotted Gudgeon in captivity–adults, eggs and juveniles. Photos by Michael Hammer i Reintroduction plan for the Southern Purple-spotted Gudgeon in the southern Murray—Darling Basin. Summary The Southern Purple-spotted Gudgeon is a small, colourful freshwater fish with a distinct genetic conservation unit in the southern Murray–Darling Basin (MDB).
    [Show full text]
  • Snowy River National Park Visitor Guide
    Snowy River National Park Visitor Guide Reserved as a national park in 1979, Snowy River National Park now covers 114,505 ha. Named after the Snowy River, which bisects the park as it cuts through Tulloch Ard Gorge on its way from the alps to the sea, the park features spectacular river scenery, magnificent deep gorges, old growth forests dominated by towering Alpine Ash and rain‐shadow Cypress Pine woodlands and pristine wilderness areas. Welcome to Country Raymond Creek Falls – 1km, 30 minutes one way In 2010 the Federal Government recognised the Gunaikurnai’s native title rights over much of Gippsland. This included much of the These picturesque falls in the south of the park can be reached all Snowy River National Park, west of the Snowy River. At the same year round from Orbost along Moorsford Road. A short walking time the Victorian Government entered into legal agreements under track leads to a view of Raymond Creek Falls plunging 20 metres into the Traditional Owner Settlement Act in acknowledgement of a deep, clear pool. To get another perspective, continue further Gunaikurnai’s traditional owner rights, known as Joint Management 300m to the bottom of the falls. of ten parks and reserves in Gippsland. Through Joint Management, the State has created an equal Tulloch Ard Gorge Lookout – 1.6km, 1.5hours return partnership with the Gunaikurnai people. The benefits of this partnership are many and include: the knowledge and culture of This walk takes you through diverse vegetation culminating in the Traditional Owners incorporated into natural resources (land) observation lookout offering spectacular views of the Snowy River management, cultural awareness and knowledge of local history, country and Tulloch Ard Gorge.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Updates 21 January 2020
    KEY UPDATES 21 JANUARY 2020 We currently have 79 customers who are experiencing outages as a result of the bushfires. Yesterday we restored power to 30 customers. We have no life support customers without power supply available. 9 customers requested individual generators. However, network power was successfully restored to 7 customers. The ADF are delivering a generator kit to one customer in Combienbar today and one customer from Club Terrace is collecting a generator kit in Bairnsdale. Today we are releasing details of the special measures we have put in place to support bushfire impacted customers. IN THE NORTH IN THE EAST Last 24 hours Last 24 hours • Returned supply to areas of Colac Colac, Nariel • Attempted access to restore power to Valley, Corryong and Tintaldra. communications tower at Cann River. No access Next 24 hours due to trees on the road. • 27 customers remain off supply. Next 24 hours • Crews are aiming to restore 6 customers in • 52 customers remain off supply (Goongerah, Bonang, Wheelers spur today. Cann River, Genoa, Double Creek, Noorinbee, Club Terrace and Combienbar), but no access available. • Generators at Corryong and Walwa will be DELWP and ADF will meet tomorrow to plan access removed today. to these areas. • Vegetation assessment and clearing of immediate • Crews are commencing 5 pole replacements in risk trees is ongoing. Crews are currently Genoa, pending access. No additional customers will sweeping areas that have been energised to be restored. continue clearing and clean up. Mt Mittamatite is still to be assessed and cleared. • Helicopter assessment of Cann River communications tower damage today, following no • Asset inspection is now complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Environmental Flows Monitoring and Assessment Program (VEFMAP) Stage 6
    Victorian Environmental Flows Monitoring and Assessment Program (VEFMAP) Stage 6 Project Update – 2018 Southern Victorian Rivers - Fish Background 2017/18 Survey Sites and Timing The Victorian Environmental Flows Monitoring and In 2017/18, surveys were undertaken to investigate Assessment Program (VEFMAP) was established by processes associated with KEQ 1 and 2 in the following the Victorian Government in 2005 to monitor and sites: assess ecosystem responses to environmental watering in priority rivers across Victoria. The program’s results • Immigration - the lower reaches of the Barwon, help inform decisions for environmental watering by Bunyip, Glenelg, Tarwin and Werribee rivers and Victoria’s Catchment Management Authorities (CMAs), Cardinia Creek (Sept-Dec 2017). Melbourne Water and the Victorian Environmental • Dispersal - the Glenelg and Moorabool rivers Water Holder (VEWH). Over the past 12 years, the (Jan-Feb 2018). information collected through VEFMAP has provided valuable data and informed significant changes to the • Distribution and recruitment - the Glenelg and program. VEFMAP is now in its sixth stage of delivery Thomson rivers (Feb-Mar 2018). and includes a strong focus on “intervention” or “flow event” type questions, for vegetation and fish. Fish Monitoring - Southern Victorian Rivers The core objective for fish monitoring in VEFMAP Stage 6 for coastal rivers is to examine the importance of environmental flows in promoting immigration, dispersal and subsequent recruitment of diadromous fish. There are two key evaluation questions for fish in coastal Victorian rivers, which were developed in collaboration with CMAs. KEQ 1 Do environmental flows enhance immigration of diadromous fishes in coastal streams? Figure 1: A juvenile (top) and adult (bottom) Tupong KEQ 2 Do environmental flows enhance dispersal, (Photo: ARI) distribution and recruitment of diadromous fishes in coastal streams? delwp.vic.gov.au VEFMAP Stage 6 Southern Victorian Rivers - Fish Methods January following a rain event in late December.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine National Park ‐ Around Heyfield, Licola and Dargo Visitor Guide
    Alpine National Park ‐ around Heyfield, Licola and Dargo Visitor Guide The Alpine National Park stretches from central Gippsland all the way to the New South Wales border where it adjoins Kosciuszko National Park. In this south‐western section of the park you will find pleasant Snow Gum woodlands, sprawling mountain vistas, spectacular rivers and gorges, as well as rich cultural heritage ‐ from the rock scatters of the Gunaikurnai people on lofty vantage points, to grazier’s huts nestling in protected folds of the high country. Hut is a further 3 km though groves of snow gums. Built in 1940, the Getting there hut is an excellent example of bush architecture. Continue 1 km This area of the Alpine National Park is situated approximately 250‐ south east from the hut to the carpark. 320 km east of Melbourne. To get to Heyfield take Princes Highway to Traralgon, then take Traralgon‐Maffra Road. Alternatively, stay on First Falls and Moroka Gorge – 6km, 3 hours return Princes Highway to Sale and continue onto A1 to Dargo From Horseyard Flat the track crosses a footbridge over the Moroka The main access is from Licola via the Tamboritha Road, which leads River before meandering through snow gum woodland and crossing to the Howitt and Moroka Roads. wetlands on boardwalks. It follows the river downstream to the First Falls. A rock platform is an ideal viewing point to see the rushing Mountain roads are often unsealed, narrow and winding. Take care Moroka River plunging into a deep pool. as roads may be slippery and surface condition poor.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Name + Length by State
    TRAIL NAME + LENGTH BY STATE STATE ROAD_NAME LENGTH_IN_KILOMETERS NEW SOUTH WALES GALAH 0.66 NEW SOUTH WALES WALLAGOOT LAKE 3.47 NEW SOUTH WALES KEITH 1.20 NEW SOUTH WALES TROLLEY 1.67 NEW SOUTH WALES RED LETTERBOX 0.17 NEW SOUTH WALES MERRICA RIVER 2.15 NEW SOUTH WALES MIDDLE 40.63 NEW SOUTH WALES NAGHI 1.18 NEW SOUTH WALES RANGE 2.42 NEW SOUTH WALES JACKS CREEK AC 0.24 NEW SOUTH WALES BILLS PARK RING 0.41 NEW SOUTH WALES WHITE ROCK 4.13 NEW SOUTH WALES STONY 2.71 NEW SOUTH WALES BINYA FOREST 12.85 NEW SOUTH WALES KANGARUTHA 8.55 NEW SOUTH WALES OOLAMBEYAN 7.10 NEW SOUTH WALES WHITTON STOCK ROUTE 1.86 NORTHERN TERRITORY WAITE RIVER HOMESTEAD 8.32 NORTHERN TERRITORY KING 0.53 NORTHERN TERRITORY HAASTS BLUFF TRACK 13.98 NORTHERN TERRITORY WA BORDER ACCESS 40.39 NORTHERN TERRITORY SEVEN EMU‐PUNGALINA 52.59 NORTHERN TERRITORY SANTA TERESA 251.49 NORTHERN TERRITORY MT DARE 105.37 NORTHERN TERRITORY BLACKGIN BORE‐MT SANFORD 38.54 NORTHERN TERRITORY ROPER 287.71 NORTHERN TERRITORY BORROLOOLA‐SPRING 63.90 NORTHERN TERRITORY REES 0.57 NORTHERN TERRITORY BOROLOOLA‐SEVEN EMU 32.02 NORTHERN TERRITORY URAPUNGA 1.91 NORTHERN TERRITORY VRDHUMBERT 49.95 NORTHERN TERRITORY ROBINSON RIVER ACCESS 46.92 NORTHERN TERRITORY AIRPORT 0.64 NORTHERN TERRITORY BUNTINE 5.63 NORTHERN TERRITORY HAY RIVER 335.62 NORTHERN TERRITORY ROPER HWY‐NATHAN RIVER 134.20 NORTHERN TERRITORY MAC CLARK PARK 7.97 NORTHERN TERRITORY PHILLIPSON STOCK ROUTE 55.84 NORTHERN TERRITORY FURNER 0.54 NORTHERN TERRITORY PORT ROPER 40.13 NORTHERN TERRITORY NDHALA GORGE 3.49 NORTHERN TERRITORY
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the Yarra
    the future of the Yarra ProPosals for a Yarra river Protection act the future of the Yarra A about environmental Justice australia environmental Justice australia (formerly the environment Defenders office, Victoria) is a not-for-profit public interest legal practice. funded by donations and independent of government and corporate funding, our legal team combines a passion for justice with technical expertise and a practical understanding of the legal system to protect our environment. We act as advisers and legal representatives to the environment movement, pursuing court cases to protect our shared environment. We work with community-based environment groups, regional and state environmental organisations, and larger environmental NGos. We also provide strategic and legal support to their campaigns to address climate change, protect nature and defend the rights of communities to a healthy environment. While we seek to give the community a powerful voice in court, we also recognise that court cases alone will not be enough. that’s why we campaign to improve our legal system. We defend existing, hard-won environmental protections from attack. at the same time, we pursue new and innovative solutions to fill the gaps and fix the failures in our legal system to clear a path for a more just and sustainable world. envirojustice.org.au about the Yarra riverkeePer association The Yarra Riverkeeper Association is the voice of the River. Over the past ten years we have established ourselves as the credible community advocate for the Yarra. We tell the river’s story, highlighting its wonders and its challenges. We monitor its health and activities affecting it.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations
    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL RIVERS AND STREAMS SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS June 1991 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 7 July 1992, and subsequent formal amendments. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origins of the changes. MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL D.H.F. Scott, B.A. (Chairman) R.W. Campbell, B.Vet.Sc., M.B.A.; Director - Natural Resource Systems, Department of Conservation and Environment (Deputy Chairman) D.M. Calder, M.Sc., Ph.D., M.I.Biol. W.A. Chamley, B.Sc., D.Phil.; Director - Fisheries Management, Department of Conservation and Environment S.M. Ferguson, M.B.E. M.D.A. Gregson, E.D., M.A.F., Aus.I.M.M.; General Manager - Minerals, Department of Manufacturing and Industry Development A.E.K. Hingston, B.Behav.Sc., M.Env.Stud., Cert.Hort. P. Jerome, B.A., Dip.T.R.P., M.A.; Director - Regional Planning, Department of Planning and Housing M.N. Kinsella, B.Ag.Sc., M.Sci., F.A.I.A.S.; Manager - Quarantine and Inspection Services, Department of Agriculture K.J. Langford, B.Eng.(Ag)., Ph.D , General Manager - Rural Water Commission R.D. Malcolmson, M.B.E., B.Sc., F.A.I.M., M.I.P.M.A., M.Inst.P., M.A.I.P. D.S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director - National Parks and Public Land, Department of Conservation and Environment K.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Walk-Issue14-1963.Pdf
    1963 Terms and Conditions of Use Copies of Walk magazine are made available under Creative Commons - Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike copyright. Use of the magazine. You are free: • To Share- to copy, distribute and transmit the work • To Remix- to adapt the work Under the following conditions (unless you receive prior written authorisation from Melbourne Bushwalkers Inc.): • Attribution- You must attribute the work (but not in any way that suggests that Melbourne Bushwalkers Inc. endorses you or your use of the work). • Noncommercial- You may not use this work for commercial purposes. • Share Alike- If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitations on Liability. Melbourne Bushwalkers Inc. makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any content of this work. Melbourne Bushwalkers Inc. disclaims any warranty for the content, and will not be liable for any damage or loss resulting from the use of any content. ----···············------------------------------· • BUSHWALKING • CAVING • ROCK CLIMBING • CAMPING • SKI TOURING PROVIDE A CHALLENGE TO MAN AND HIS EQUIPMENT, FOR OVER 30 YEARS, PADDYMADE CAMP GEAR HAS PROVED ITS WORTH TO THOUSANDS OF WALKERS AND OUT-OF-DOORS ADVEN­ TURERS. MAKE SURE YOU, TOO, HAVE THE BEST OF GEAR. From- PADDY PALLIN Py. ltd. 201 CASTLEREAGH STREET, SYDNEY - Phone BM 2685 Ask for our Latest Price List Get your copy of "Bushwalking - --- and Camping," by Paddy Pallin -5/6 posted --------------------------------------------------· CWalk A JOURNAL OF THE MELBOURNE BUSHW ALKERS NUMBER FOURTEEN 1963 CONTENTS: * BY THE PEOPLE 'l ...
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Harbour Docklands Conservation Management
    VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS Conservation Management Plan Prepared for Places Victoria & City of Melbourne June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi PROJECT TEAM xii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and brief 1 1.2 Melbourne Docklands 1 1.3 Master planning & development 2 1.4 Heritage status 2 1.5 Location 2 1.6 Methodology 2 1.7 Report content 4 1.7.1 Management and development 4 1.7.2 Background and contextual history 4 1.7.3 Physical survey and analysis 4 1.7.4 Heritage significance 4 1.7.5 Conservation policy and strategy 5 1.8 Sources 5 1.9 Historic images and documents 5 2.0 MANAGEMENT 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Management responsibilities 7 2.2.1 Management history 7 2.2.2 Current management arrangements 7 2.3 Heritage controls 10 2.3.1 Victorian Heritage Register 10 2.3.2 Victorian Heritage Inventory 10 2.3.3 Melbourne Planning Scheme 12 2.3.4 National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 12 2.4 Heritage approvals & statutory obligations 12 2.4.1 Where permits are required 12 2.4.2 Permit exemptions and minor works 12 2.4.3 Heritage Victoria permit process and requirements 13 2.4.4 Heritage impacts 14 2.4.5 Project planning and timing 14 2.4.6 Appeals 15 LOVELL CHEN i 3.0 HISTORY 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Pre-contact history 17 3.3 Early European occupation 17 3.4 Early Melbourne shipping and port activity 18 3.5 Railways development and expansion 20 3.6 Victoria Dock 21 3.6.1 Planning the dock 21 3.6.2 Constructing the dock 22 3.6.3 West Melbourne Dock opens
    [Show full text]