DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation Programmatic Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation Programmatic Environmental Assessment Programmatic Environmental Assessment Transportation: Bridges, Culverts, Roads, and Landslides Commonwealth of Puerto Rico November 2020 U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Region II Caribbean Area Office - Joint Recovery Office 50 Carr. 165, Guaynabo, PR 00968 Programmatic Environmental Assessment FEMA Puerto Rico Transportation PEA TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ II LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ IV LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................. V 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 8 2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ............................................................................................................ 8 3.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 9 4.0 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................... 12 4.1 ALTERNATIVE 1: NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE ..................................................................................................... 13 4.2 ALTERNATIVE 2: BRIDGE AND CULVERT REPLACEMENT ................................................................................... 13 4.3 ALTERNATIVE 3: REPAIR OF LANDSLIDES .......................................................................................................... 15 4.4 ALTERNATIVE 4: HAZARD MITIGATION AND REPAIR OF BRIDGES, CULVERTS, AND ROADWAYS ...................... 16 4.5 ALTERNATIVE 5: A COMBINATION OF ALTERNATIVES 2 THROUGH 4 ................................................................ 18 5.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ........................................... 19 5.1 GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS ................................................................................................................ 20 5.1.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 20 5.1.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation.............................................................................................. 22 5.2 AIR QUALITY ..................................................................................................................................................... 25 5.2.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 26 5.2.2 Potential Impacts and proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................. 27 5.3 WATER QUALITY ............................................................................................................................................... 29 5.3.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 30 5.3.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation.............................................................................................. 31 5.4 WETLANDS ........................................................................................................................................................ 34 5.4.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 34 5.4.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation.............................................................................................. 35 5.5 FLOODPLAIN ...................................................................................................................................................... 37 5.5.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 38 5.5.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation.............................................................................................. 39 5.6 COASTAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................................ 41 5.6.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 42 5.6.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation.............................................................................................. 43 5.7 VEGETATION ...................................................................................................................................................... 45 5.7.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 45 5.7.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation.............................................................................................. 46 5.8 WILDLIFE AND FISH ........................................................................................................................................... 47 5.8.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 48 5.8.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation.............................................................................................. 49 5.9 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES ......................................................................................................... 51 5.9.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 52 ii Programmatic Environmental Assessment FEMA Puerto Rico Transportation PEA 5.9.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation.............................................................................................. 53 5.10 CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................... 55 5.10.1 Historic (Standing) Structures ................................................................................................................ 56 5.10.2 Archaeological Resources ....................................................................................................................... 58 5.11 SOCIOECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ............................................................................................ 60 5.11.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 61 5.11.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation............................................................................................ 62 5.12 LAND USE AND PLANNING ............................................................................................................................... 63 5.12.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 63 5.12.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation............................................................................................ 65 5.13 NOISE............................................................................................................................................................... 67 5.13.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 67 5.13.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation............................................................................................ 69 5.14 TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................................................................ 70 5.14.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 70 5.14.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation............................................................................................ 71 5.15 PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES .................................................................................................................... 72 5.15.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 73 5.15.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation............................................................................................ 73 5.16 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY .......................................................................................................................... 75 5.16.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 75 5.16.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 144/Friday, July 30, 2021/Proposed
    40996 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 144 / Friday, July 30, 2021 / Proposed Rules Critical component/end Percentage of domestic Line item No. product content [List as necessary] the left side of the screen, under the the evaluation of the accuracy of the (End of clause) Document Type heading, check the current taxonomic interpretation. [FR Doc. 2021–15881 Filed 7–29–21; 8:45 am] Proposed Rule box to locate this Please include sufficient information BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P document. You may submit a comment with your submission (such as scientific by clicking on ‘‘Comment.’’ journal articles or other publications) to (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail allow us to verify any scientific or to: Public Comments Processing, Attn: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR commercial information you include. FWS–R4–ES–2020–0125, U.S. Fish and Please note that submissions merely Fish and Wildlife Service Wildlife Service, MS: PRB/3W, 5275 stating support for, or opposition to, the Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041– action under consideration without 50 CFR Part 17 3803. providing supporting information, We request that you send comments although noted, will not be considered [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2020–0125; only by the methods described above. in making a determination, as section FF09E22000 FXES11130900000 212] We will post all comments on http:// 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that RIN 1018–BE41 www.regulations.gov. This generally determinations as to whether any means that we will post any personal species is an endangered or a threatened Endangered and Threatened Wildlife information you provide us (see species must be made ‘‘solely on the and Plants; Removing Adiantum Information Requested, below, for more basis of the best scientific and vivesii From the Federal List of information).
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Plant List 10/04/12
    FLORIDA The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time to plant a tree is today. City of Sunrise Approved Plant List 10/04/12 Appendix A 10/4/12 APPROVED PLANT LIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SG xx Slow Growing “xx” = minimum height in Small Mature tree height of less than 20 feet at time of planting feet OH Trees adjacent to overhead power lines Medium Mature tree height of between 21 – 40 feet U Trees within Utility Easements Large Mature tree height greater than 41 N Not acceptable for use as a replacement feet * Native Florida Species Varies Mature tree height depends on variety Mature size information based on Betrock’s Florida Landscape Plants Published 2001 GROUP “A” TREES Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Avocado Persea Americana L Bahama Strongbark Bourreria orata * U, SG 6 S Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum * L Black Olive Shady Bucida buceras ‘Shady Lady’ L Lady Black Olive Bucida buceras L Brazil Beautyleaf Calophyllum brasiliense L Blolly Guapira discolor* M Bridalveil Tree Caesalpinia granadillo M Bulnesia Bulnesia arboria M Cinnecord Acacia choriophylla * U, SG 6 S Group ‘A’ Plant List for Single Family Homes Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Citrus: Lemon, Citrus spp. OH S (except orange, Lime ect. Grapefruit) Citrus: Grapefruit Citrus paradisi M Trees Copperpod Peltophorum pterocarpum L Fiddlewood Citharexylum fruticosum * U, SG 8 S Floss Silk Tree Chorisia speciosa L Golden – Shower Cassia fistula L Green Buttonwood Conocarpus erectus * L Gumbo Limbo Bursera simaruba * L
    [Show full text]
  • Gumbo Limbo Final Draft.Pub
    Stephen H. Brown, Horticulture Agent Bronwyn Mason, Master Gardener Lee County Extension, Fort Myers, Florida (239) 533-7513 [email protected] http://lee.ifas.ufl.edu/hort/GardenHome.shtml Botanical Name: Bursera simaruba Family: Burseraceae Common Names: Gumbo limbo, tourist tree, turpentine tree, almácigo Synonyms (Discarded names): Bursera elaphrium, B. pistacia Origin: South Florida, Bahamas, Carib- bean, Yucatan peninsula, Central America, Northern and Western South America U.S.D.A. Zone: 9B-11 (25°F minimum) Plant Type: Medium to large-sized tree Leaf Type: Pinnately compound Growth Rate: Fast Typical Dimensions: 25’-50’ x 25’-50’ Leaf Persistence: Briefly deciduous Flowering Season: Winter, spring Light Requirements: High Salt Tolerance: High Ft Myers Beach, Florida, late July Drought Tolerance: High Wind Tolerance: High Soil Requirements: Well-drained; wide variety of soil types including alkaline Nutritional Requirements: Low Environmental Problems: Weak branches Major Potential Pests: Croton scale, rugose spiraling whitefly Propagation: Seeds, cuttings Human Hazards: None Uses: Shade, parking lot island, specimen, streetscape, wildlife Natural Geographic Distribution Bursera is a genus of about 100 species in tropical America with gumbo limbo, B. simaruba, being one of the most wide- spread species. It is native along both coasts of Florida southwards from Pinellas County on the west and Brevard County on the east. The species is widespread throughout the Caribbean and the Baha- mas. Its continental range extends from the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico to Panama, Columbia, Venezuela, Guyana, and north- ern Brazil. Ft Myers, Florida Growth and Wood Characteristics Gumbo limbo is one of the fastest growing native trees. The growth is so rapid that a six- to eight-foot tree can be produced from seed in 18 months.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/061206 Al 21 April 2016 (21.04.2016) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/061206 Al 21 April 2016 (21.04.2016) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agent: BAUER, Christopher; PIONEER HI-BRED IN C12N 15/82 (2006.01) A01N 65/00 (2009.01) TERNATIONAL, INC., 7100 N.W. 62nd Avenue, John C07K 14/415 (2006.01) ston, Iowa 5013 1-1014 (US). (21) International Application Number: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every PCT/US2015/055502 kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (22) Date: International Filing BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, 14 October 2015 (14.10.201 5) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (25) Filing Language: English HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (26) Publication Language: English MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (30) Priority Data: PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, 62/064,810 16 October 20 14 ( 16.10.20 14) US SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (71) Applicants: PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC. [US/US]; 7100 N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.44 ,L Regional Director, U.S.{Fisl1 a D Wildlife Service
    RECOVERY PLAN for Pleodendron macranthum and Eugenia haematocarpa Prepared by Kenneth W. Foote Bequerdn Field Office US. Fish and Wildlife Service Boquerbn, Puerto Rico for the US. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia 3.44 ,L Regional Director, U.S.{Fisl1 a d Wildlife Service Date: DISCLAIMER Recovery Plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect species. Plans are published by the US. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State (Commonwealth) agencies, and others. Plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to additional peer review before they are adopted by the Service. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to and other constraints the involved as as to budgetary affecting parties , well the need address other priorities- Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific tasks and may not represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in formulating the plan, other then the US. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the US. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. By approving this document, the Regional Director certifies that the data used in its development represent the best scientific and commercial data available at the time it was written. Copies of all documents reviewed in the development of the plan are available in the administrative record, located at the Boqueron Field Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 119/Thursday, June 20, 2019/Notices
    28850 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2019 / Notices or speech-impaired individuals may status reviews of 53 species under the Relay Service at 800–877–8339 for TTY access this number through TTY by Endangered Species Act, as amended. A assistance. calling the toll-free Federal Relay 5-year review is an assessment of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Service at 800–877–8339. best scientific and commercial data Dated: June 14, 2019. available at the time of the review. We Why do we conduct 5-year reviews? are requesting submission of Brian D. Montgomery, Under the Endangered Species Act of Acting Deputy Secretary. information that has become available since the last reviews of these species. 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 [FR Doc. 2019–13146 Filed 6–19–19; 8:45 am] et seq.), we maintain lists of endangered BILLING CODE 4210–67–P DATES: To allow us adequate time to and threatened wildlife and plant conduct these reviews, we must receive species in title 50 of the Code of Federal your comments or information on or Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.11 (for DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR before August 19, 2019. However, we wildlife) and 17.12 (for plants: List). will continue to accept new information Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the ESA requires us Fish and Wildlife Service about any listed species at any time. to review each listed species’ status at least once every 5 years. Our regulations [FWS–R4–ES–2019–N037; ADDRESSES: For instructions on how to FXES11130900000C2–190–FF09E32000] submit information and review at 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish a notice in the Federal Register Endangered and Threatened Wildlife information that we receive on these species, see Request for New announcing those species under active and Plants; Initiation of 5-Year Status review.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Density of Cebus Imitator, Honduras
    Neotropical Primates 26(1), September 2020 47 POPULATION DENSITY ESTIMATE FOR THE WHITE-FACED CAPUCHIN MONKEY (CEBUS IMITATOR) IN THE MULTIPLE USE AREA MONTAÑA LA BOTIJA, CHOLUTECA, HONDURAS, AND A RANGE EXTENSION FOR THE SPECIES Eduardo José Pinel Ramos M.Sc. Biological Sciences, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Cra. 27 a # 67-14, barrio 7 de agosto, Bogotá D.C., e-mail: <[email protected]> Abstract Honduras is one of the Neotropical countries with the least amount of information available regarding the conservation status of its wild primate species. Understanding the real conservation status of these species is relevant, since they are of great importance for ecosystem dynamics due to the diverse ecological services they provide. However, there are many threats that endanger the conservation of these species in the country such as deforestation, illegal hunting, and illegal wild- life trafficking. The present research is the first official registration of the Central American white-faced capuchin monkey (Cebus imitator) for the Pacific slope in southern Honduras, increasing the range of its known distribution in the country. A preliminary population density estimate of the capuchin monkey was performed in the Multiple Use Area Montaña La Botija using the line transect method, resulting in a population density of 1.04 groups/km² and 4.96 ind/km² in the studied area. These results provide us with a first look at an isolated primate population that has never been described before and demonstrate the need to develop long-term studies to better understand the population dynamics, ecology, and behaviour, for this group in the zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee
    Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories Compiled by S. Oldfield Edited by D. Procter and L.V. Fleming ISBN: 1 86107 502 2 © Copyright Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1999 Illustrations and layout by Barry Larking Cover design Tracey Weeks Printed by CLE Citation. Procter, D., & Fleming, L.V., eds. 1999. Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Disclaimer: reference to legislation and convention texts in this document are correct to the best of our knowledge but must not be taken to infer definitive legal obligation. Cover photographs Front cover: Top right: Southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome (Richard White/JNCC). The world’s largest concentrations of southern rockhopper penguin are found on the Falkland Islands. Centre left: Down Rope, Pitcairn Island, South Pacific (Deborah Procter/JNCC). The introduced rat population of Pitcairn Island has successfully been eradicated in a programme funded by the UK Government. Centre right: Male Anegada rock iguana Cyclura pinguis (Glen Gerber/FFI). The Anegada rock iguana has been the subject of a successful breeding and re-introduction programme funded by FCO and FFI in collaboration with the National Parks Trust of the British Virgin Islands. Back cover: Black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris (Richard White/JNCC). Of the global breeding population of black-browed albatross, 80 % is found on the Falkland Islands and 10% on South Georgia. Background image on front and back cover: Shoal of fish (Charles Sheppard/Warwick
    [Show full text]
  • Reporton the Rare Plants of Puerto Rico
    REPORTON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO tii:>. CENTER FOR PLANT CONSERVATION ~ Missouri Botanical Garden St. Louis, Missouri July 15, l' 992 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Center for Plant Conservation would like to acknowledge the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the W. Alton Jones Foundation for their generous support of the Center's work in the priority region of Puerto Rico. We would also like to thank all the participants in the task force meetings, without whose information this report would not be possible. Cover: Zanthoxy7um thomasianum is known from several sites in Puerto Rico and the U.S . Virgin Islands. It is a small shrub (2-3 meters) that grows on the banks of cliffs. Threats to this taxon include development, seed consumption by insects, and road erosion. The seeds are difficult to germinate, but Fairchild Tropical Garden in Miami has plants growing as part of the Center for Plant Conservation's .National Collection of Endangered Plants. (Drawing taken from USFWS 1987 Draft Recovery Plan.) REPORT ON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements A. Summary 8. All Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands Species of Conservation Concern Explanation of Attached Lists C. Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [8] species D. Blank Taxon Questionnaire E. Data Sources for Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [B] species F. Pue~to Rico\Virgin Islands Task Force Invitees G. Reviewers of Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [8] Species REPORT ON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO SUMMARY The Center for Plant Conservation (Center) has held two meetings of the Puerto Rlco\Virgin Islands Task Force in Puerto Rico.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Expenditure Report (1998)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Federal and State Endangered and Threatened Species Expenditures Fiscal Year 1998 January 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... ii What is the purpose of this report? ....................................................................................................... ii What expenditures are reported?.......................................................................................................... ii What expenditures are not included?.................................................................................................... ii What are the expenditures reported for FY 1998?................................................................................ ii How does the 1998 expenditure report compare to other years? ......................................................... ii ENDANGERED SPECIES EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR 1998...................................................1 PURPOSE.............................................................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................1 What does "Reasonably Identifiable Expenditures" mean? .........................................................1 What is not included in the report? ...............................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • US EPA-Pesticides; Dodine
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDESDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES PC Code: 044301 DP Barcode: D338148 Date: January 22, 2008 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Ecological Risk Assessment for the Dodine Section 3 New Use on Peanuts and Bananas TO: Robert Westin, Product Manager Mary Waller, Team Leader Registration Division (7505P) FROM: Christopher J. Salice, P.h.D, Biologist Marietta Echeverria, Envronmental Scientist Environmental Risk Branch IV Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) REVIEWED BY: Thomas Steeger, Ph.D., Senior Biologist R. David Jones, Ph.D., Senior Agronomist Environmental Risk Branch IV Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) APPROVED BY: Elizabeth Behl, Branch Chief Environmental Risk Branch IV Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) The Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED) has reviewed the proposed label for the use of dodine (n-dodecylguanidine monoacetate; CAS 2439-10-3) and its end-use product SYLLIT® FL (39.6% dodine) fungicide on peanuts and bananas. The results of this screening-level risk assessment indicate that the proposed new uses of dodine on peanuts and bananas have the potential for direct adverse effects on listed and non-listed freshwater and estuarine/marine invertebrates, listed and non-listed vascular and non-vascular plants, and listed and non-listed birds and mammals. Major data gaps are listed below. Without these data potential risk to the associated taxa can not be precluded: • Aquatic vascular plant toxicity data (850.4400) There is uncertainty regarding the potential chronic effects of dodine to saltwater invertebrates and fish since there are no toxicity data. Using acute-to-chronic ratios (ACR) from freshwater species to calculate chronic endpoints for the saltwater species, however, suggests that risks may be low.
    [Show full text]
  • Culinary Entertainment, Creative Labor, and the Reterritorialization of White Masculinity
    This is a repository copy of Culinary Entertainment, Creative Labor, and the Reterritorialization of White Masculinity. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/150181/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Negra, D and Tasker, Y orcid.org/0000-0001-8130-2251 (2019) Culinary Entertainment, Creative Labor, and the Reterritorialization of White Masculinity. Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, 59 (1). pp. 112-133. ISSN 1527-2087 © 2019 University of Texas Press. This is a pre-copyedited version of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Cinema and Media Studies following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available through the University of Texas Press. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Culinary Entertainment, Creative Labor and the Re-Territorialization of White Masculinity Abstract This article explores popular cultural themes of masculinity and mobility in the context of post-race and “end of men” discourses.
    [Show full text]