GSU May Stage
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
GSU May Stage A Second Strike Administration (NLRB); (To be approved as a union by NLRB the GSU must Given 3 Weeks have 30 percent of all UCSD grad students sign pledge cards to Respond supporting GSU; then NLRB will hold an election. If a by Mark Stadler and majority of grad students voting Craig Uchida support unionization the GSU In three weeks the Graduate becomes an officially Student Union may stage recognized union.) another "work action." --hold meetings for all grad By an almost unanimous vote students, by department, to last Thursday night the GSU, discuss the conditions and with about 100 members manner in which a trike would present, decided to give the UC be carried out; ., " San Diego administration three --prepare publicity "ad ..-"'.- weeks to cere pond concretely dressed specifically" to un to" their previously stated dergraduates, faculty and staff demands. and non-GSU grad students, as Then, on November 3, the to why a "strike might be entire GSU O1embership "will necessary" and how they "can assess the quality of the support the GSU" in uch an Students gathered in &ont of the gylll to hear a Friday noon concert by "Horsefeathers," a negotiating process and the event; popular San DielO area band. (n photo: NatlMan Meyen) results which have, or are likely --prepare accurate financial to issue these from, and will and membership reports and make a decision on that basis as make "every effort to in to whether or not to engage in sure .. that every grad student SBPC Fai& to Expell .UCSB's Moran; an immediate work action." who has si gned a Union card The four GSU demands pays dues; " and include a 50070 TA com --"Take any other action 3 Reps Rumored to Have Quit pensation, or its equivalent, for necessary to prepare the campus all graduate students needing it, community and the Union for by Mark Stadler for External President last UCSB Daily Nexus. the po sibility of a strike or News Editor yearly contracts for all grad pring. No VOle for UCSB tudents is ued the spring work action." Abstaining from voting were Another vital motion pa sed The UC Student Body Dur.ing the closed meeting a before, no increase in work load UC Santa Cruz' two call was received from the or section size and fee and Thursday directed the GSU Pres ident's Council fell one representatives, who were Steering Committee to hold vote hort of expelling Neil UCSB Legislative Council, tuition waivers for all grad directed by their Committee of directing its other represen tudents. "informal di cussions" with Moran (UC Santa Barbara) for College Representatives (CCR) other labor unions about campaign violations, in a tative, Jody Graham, not to trike Organizing Committee to not vote. vote. Graham would not In addition the GSU ap honoring a po si ble strike. marathon meeting last Friday at Santa Cruz undergraduate If this could be accomplished UC San Diego. comment on this, but it was proved the formation of a repre entative Cathy Nelson Strike Organizing Committee it would make the GSU strike The vote was eight to six, presumed that this action was tola the SBPC that while she taken because of a contlict of (SOC) to: . ' much more effective than last wit h two abstentions. Nine "did not agree with CCR's --gain the GSU membership . year's action. votes, or a two-thirds majority, interest being present. request," she could not remain Glass, who was allowed in in the San Diego Labor The three-week waiting we re needed to remove Moran, involved knowing the CCR "is Council; period and SOC motions were who was formally charged with part of the closed session as a strongly opposed to any SBPC key witness, said after he had ·-have the GSU approved a introduced following nearly two violating the UC Santa Barbara intervention in campus matters certified union by the National hours of often-fiery di cus ion election code in his campaign left that the SBPC had allowed of any kind." nine of the charges to be Labor Relations Board Continued on Page 12 Resignations? dropped, leaving the stamp violations that Moran had Urey Signs It was also rumored that three already admitted to. Hamburger, Panel Explain representatives resigned from Glass, who described that as the SBPC in protest of Moran's Antirdstrology "plea bargaining," was not reinstatement. This action Discovery of Allergy Drug pleased with the vote. supposedly came during the There was a great controversy by Barry Bov how Statements three-and-a·half hour closed over closing the session to session during which the SBPC taff Reporter UC San Diego's Harold discuss Moran's case. The Urey, a professor emeritus Of considered Moran's case. SBPC Operating Code requires Robert N. Hamburger, head of the department of immunology As of Sunday night this chem istry and a Nobel Prize that "trials" of members be and allergy at UC SanDiego, di cu ed hi development of an anti wi nner, was one of the 185 rumor has not been confirmed held in ecret. However, everal allergen last Thur day ni ght in the Revelle cafeteria. or denied. prominent scientists who signed members, led by UCSD' Irma The research leading to Hamburger' di co very began eight year Moran was charged with, and a strongly.worded letter con Muniz and Joe Roger, tried to ago. admitted to, failing to report demni ng beliefin astrology. keep the meetings open. A Fit t , Hamburger e plained allergy reaction, and how hi s the purchase of $3 worth of The letter, published in a motion to that eff~ct was di. covery of a crucial pentapeptide affect the reaction. recent special issue of postage stamps within the rejected by an 8-5 vote. The pentapeptide block the Immunoglobulin E (lgE) -- the " Humanities" magazine, has required time and inaccurately Munoz then moved that sub tance which cau e allergic reaction -- and control the rela e bee n widely criticized as Ii ting those tamps on hi people "directly involved" with of hi tamine. needle s and arrogant. campaign statement. the case be allowed in. This wa Hi tamine, inherent in the body, i found in only two blood cell . That infraction was one of six voted down 9-6. Urey told the Encinitas-based brought against Moran by Murv ontinued on Page 12 Coa t Dispatch in an interview, 8-7 on Executive ession Glass, who was one of Moran' Then a motion to move into "All my life I've been trying to opponents for ' the External fi ght ignorance and misin· Executive ession wa accepted Affairs post. Glass told the by a tense 8-7 vote. formation. I ju t don't un Triton Times Friday night that ders tand how people can believe Several student present he would begin a recall drive berated the SBPC for thi this on the basis of no evidence against Moran today at UCSB. at all." . action, saying that its tanding Moran could not be found in student eyes wa growing " Irrationalism and for comment Friday night but 'Obscurall m" lower by the minute. Otl according to a source he told Wat on, of the tudent SBPC members in the executive Cooperative, a ked UCSD The letter say" in part, that session that he favored leaving a trology contributes "to the repre entative not to follow the the maller to' the UCSB cam· other members intQ closed growth of irrationalism and pus. sc ion. ob curatism. We believe the It was announced before the lime has come to challenge Marco LiMandri, UCSD' SBPC went into executive other representative on SBP , directly, and forcefully, the session that II charges were to pretentious claims of polled UCSD tudent present be considered against Moran. on the i ue. An overwhelming a trologieal charlatans." These charges were aid to Urey said he has seen neither majority upported Watson' include the campaign contention. per.s ~asive evidence proving the violations, harming SBPC and At Iect1n Oft ....co ..ry of .1ItI·...... n ....., t,.. left, tile UCSD' representative were validity of astroloaical study Moran's own credibility and 0... 1or, II M.Itz... , Clffonl ~..... , ••rt H_..... r Con''''_ o..... 7 landering the SBPC in the , Con ..... o. Paae 7 .......rt .HtI. (n ....to: .....ft Meyen) OM'S Monday, October 13, 1915 Monday, October 13, 197~ , Paaetwo •r •••• ,f. •rhol,.lnl(~ · I 1 Letters to the Editor A Case of Guns versus Personal Autonomy • rl~ollfl OM'S . by Martin Hadwin the Constitution. The obvious Soto on Hayden: Many Inaccuracies bows and arrows, matches (for be firsf to turn them in , alo ng would be foi led in his scheme by intent of these amendments is to r:"'DIIgo Over the last few quarters, setting adversaries on fire), even with those people with the being unable to acquire a I It is inexcusable that the first It is this type of irresponsible columns in which a very small prevent the encroachment of several articles have appeared in a simple pocket knife. Should greatest respect for the law; suitable gun? Would Fromme Jolm H. Taylor Mark Woelber information the readers of the reporting which has placed the minority takes advantage of its government on the freedom and James G:Solo the Triton Times in support of the government restrict the criminals would not be about to have had to throw in the towel Edltor-iD-Cllief Managing editOl' Triton Times have received Triton Times in disfavor with position to make its opinions autonomy of individuals. Now City editor gun control, the latest one by exchange of these items as well? surrender theirs.