DOCSLIB.ORG

Cleveland Police Monitoring Team Ninth Semiannual Report (Pdf)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cleveland Police Monitoring Team Ninth Semiannual Report (Pdf) Case: 1:15-cv-01046-SO Doc #: 345 Filed: 02/24/21 1 of 126. PageID #: 7289 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CASE NO.: 1:15-CV-01046 ) Plaintiff, ) ) JUDGE SOLOMON OLIVER, JR. vs. ) ) NOTICE SUBMITTING MONITORING CITY OF CLEVELAND ) TEAM’S NINTH SEMIANNUAL ) REPORT Defendant. ) ) ) Pursuant to paragraph 375 of the Consent Decree, the Monitoring Team respectfully submits its Ninth Semiannual Report. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Hassan Aden HASSAN ADEN Monitor The Aden Group LLC 8022 Fairfax Road Alexandria, VA 22308 Tel: (571) 274-7821 Email: [email protected] Case: 1:15-cv-01046-SO Doc #: 345 Filed: 02/24/21 2 of 126. PageID #: 7290 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 24, 2021, I served the foregoing document entitled NOTICE SUBMITTING MONITORING TEAM’S NINTH SEMIANNUAL REPORT via the court’s ECF system to all counsel of record. /s/ Ayesha Hardaway AYESHA HARDAWAY 2 Case: 1:15-cv-01046-SO Doc #: 345 Filed: 02/24/21 3 of 126. PageID #: 7291 Cleveland Police Ninth Semiannual Report Monitoring Team February 2021 Case: 1:15-cv-01046-SO Doc #: 345 Filed: 02/24/21 4 of 126. PageID #: 7292 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 2. RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................. 2 II. DEMONSTRATION REVIEW ........................................................................................... 6 1. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 6 2. TIMELINE OF MAY 30, 2020, DEMONSTRATIONS .................................................................. 7 3. CHANGES IN MODERN PROTESTING ...................................................................................... 7 4. CONSENT DECREE PROVISIONS IMPLICATED ........................................................................ 9 5. COMMUNITY EXPERIENCE .................................................................................................. 11 a. Public Feedback Provided to the Monitoring Team ...................................................... 12 i. Police Preparation and Response .................................................................................. 13 ii. Police Communication ............................................................................................... 15 iii. Protestor Behaviors ..................................................................................................... 16 iv. Police Use of Equipment and Weapons ..................................................................... 16 b. Summary of Community Experience Feedback .............................................................. 17 c. Community Police Commission ..................................................................................... 17 d. Recommendations from Community Experience ............................................................ 18 6. USE OF FORCE ..................................................................................................................... 19 a. Use of force timeline ...................................................................................................... 19 b. CDP Polices on Use of Force in a Crowd Management Context .................................. 31 c. Reported Uses of Force .................................................................................................. 33 d. Use of Force Reporting Requirements ........................................................................... 36 e. Force Reporting on May 30, 2020 ................................................................................. 38 f. Policies Regarding Review of Force .............................................................................. 39 g. Force Review .................................................................................................................. 41 h. Recommendations regarding Use of Force Policy and Procedures .............................. 43 7. USE OF BODY WORN CAMERAS .......................................................................................... 43 a. Body Worn Camera Policy ............................................................................................. 43 b. Body Worn Camera Use on May 30, 2020 ..................................................................... 44 c. Recommendation ............................................................................................................ 45 8. ACCOUNTABILITY ............................................................................................................... 45 9. DISPERSAL ORDERS ............................................................................................................ 46 a. Law and Policies Governing Dispersal Orders ............................................................. 46 b. Timeline of Justice Center dispersal order .................................................................... 47 c. Method of delivery. ......................................................................................................... 48 d. Directions given. ............................................................................................................ 49 e. Time to comply. .............................................................................................................. 49 10. MUTUAL AID PARTNERSHIPS .......................................................................................... 50 Case: 1:15-cv-01046-SO Doc #: 345 Filed: 02/24/21 5 of 126. PageID #: 7293 11. OVERVIEW OF INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM (ICS) ........................................................ 51 a. A Brief History of Incident Management ....................................................................... 51 b. Command and Control Learning Model ........................................................................ 52 c. ICS Resources in Cleveland ........................................................................................... 53 D. Planning by the City of Cleveland .................................................................................. 54 e. Assessment of ICS Planning and Response .................................................................... 56 f. Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 56 III. UPDATE ON THE CITY OF CLEVELAND’S PROGRESS TOWARDS COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONSENT DECREE ............................................................... 63 IV. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND BUILDING TRUST ..................................... 66 a. Community Police Commission (“CPC”) ..................................................................... 66 i. Background ................................................................................................................. 67 b. District Policing Committees ......................................................................................... 68 V. COMMUNITY & PROBLEM-ORIENTED POLICING ............................................... 69 VI. BIAS-FREE POLICING ................................................................................................. 70 a. Where the Division Stands ............................................................................................. 70 VII. USE OF FORCE .............................................................................................................. 71 1. OFFICER USE OF FORCE PRINCIPLES & POLICY ................................................................... 71 2. USE OF FORCE INVESTIGATION AND REVIEW ...................................................................... 73 a. Background .................................................................................................................... 74 b. Supervisory Review Policy ............................................................................................. 75 c. Force Investigation Team Manual ................................................................................. 75 d. Progress and Tasks that Remain .................................................................................... 75 i. Officer Training and Policy Implementation .............................................................. 75 ii. Operation of FRB ....................................................................................................... 76 iii. Compliance & Adherence to New Policies ................................................................ 76 VIII. CRISIS INTERVENTION .............................................................................................. 76 a. Background .................................................................................................................... 78 b. Where the Division Stands ............................................................................................. 78 i. MHRAC Subcommittees: Training, Community Engagement, Diversion, Quality Improvement ...................................................................................................................... 79 c. Progress and Tasks that Remain ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2009 Mayor's Annual Report
    CITY OF CLEVELAND 2009 MAyor’s ANNUAL REPORT To the Citizens of Cleveland MayorRpt CVRpg wBKpg-wrkg.indd 1 2/26/2010 11:16:45 AM Photo Credit: Cover image: Donn Nottage, Chief Photographer, City of Cleveland Special thanks to Michele Whitlow and Julie Marini of the Mayor’s Operations Efficiency Program Management Office (PMO). 2009 Mayor’s Annual Report City of Cleveland Frank G. Jackson, Mayor March 2010 Table of Contents Mayor’s Letter…………………………………………………… v Introduction ………………………………………………………vii Operations Cluster Aging……………………………………….……. 4 Civil Service……………………………………… 10 Community Relations Board………………………. 14 Consumer Affairs………………….……………… 20 Personnel & Human Resources……………………. 24 Parks, Recreation & Properties…………………… 28 Public Health……………………………………… 34 Public Service…………………………………….. 40 Public Utilities…………………………………….. 46 Development Cluster Building & Housing………………………………… 54 City Planning………………………………………. 58 Community Development…………………………… 62 Economic Development……………..………………. 68 Office of Equal Opportunity………..……………… 74 Port Control………………………………………… 78 Public Safety Administration ……………………………………… 86 City Kennel ……..………………………………….. 88 Correction…………………………………………. 92 Emergency Medical Service………..………………. 96 Fire……………………………………..………….. 100 Police………………………………………………. 104 Finance ……………………………………………..………….. 110 Education ……………………………………………………. 116 Law………………………………………………….…….…… 126 Citizen’s Guide………………………….…………………… 131 Index ………………………………………………..…… 136 2009 Mayor’s Annual Report User Guide Department John Smith, Director __________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Dissell V. Cleveland, 2018-Ohio-5444.]
    [Cite as Dissell v. Cleveland, 2018-Ohio-5444.] RACHEL L. DISSELL Case No. 2017-00855PQ Requester Special Master Jeffery W. Clark v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CITY OF CLEVELAND, Respondent {¶1} Ohio’s Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43, provides a remedy for production of records under R.C. 2743.75 if the court of claims determines that a public office has denied access to public records in violation of R.C. 149.43(B). The policy underlying the Act is that “open government serves the public interest and our democratic system.” State ex rel. Dann v. Taft, 109 Ohio St.3d 364, 2006-Ohio-1825, 848 N.E.2d 472, ¶ 20. Therefore, the Act is construed liberally in favor of broad access, and any doubt is resolved in favor of disclosure of public records. State ex rel. Glasgow v. Jones, 119 Ohio St.3d 391, 2008-Ohio-4788, 894 N.E.2d 686, ¶ 13. {¶2} On June 26, 2017, requester Rachel Dissell, a reporter for The Plain Dealer, sent respondent City of Cleveland an email containing the following public records request: For Jan 1, 2016 – Dec. 31, 2016 and for Jan. 1, 2017 through June 1, 2017 the following electronically collected EMS and Cleveland Division of Fire information: CAD (Computer Aided Dispatch) records for calls where Cleveland EMS and/or Cleveland Fire Department units were dispatched for opioid overdose calls, including heroin, synthetic opioids, fentanyl, carfentanil or opioid mixtures that include marijuana or [sic] (Complaint at 3.) On August 9, 2017, Cleveland Public Records sent a response stating: Case No.
    [Show full text]
  • Man Agem Ment Cit T & Ef N Ty of Fficie Nove Clev Ency Embe Velan Stud Er 200 Nd Dy 09
    City of Cleveland Management & Efficiency Study November 2009 In Conjunction with: Public Financial Management Two Logan Square, Suite 1600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Enterprising Results 215 567 6100 www.pfm.com Table of Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 II. Overview of Findings and Recommendations ...................................................... 5 III. Focus Areas ....................................................................................................... 11 1 Structure of Government 2 Intergovernmental 3 Revenue 4 Capital Improvement Plan 5 Workforce & Collective Bargaining IV. Departments ....................................................................................................... 71 a. Department of Public Service ........................................................... 73 1. Division of Architecture 2. Division of Streets 3. Division of Waste Collection and Disposal 4. Division of Traffic Engineering 5. Division of Engineering and Construction 6. Division of Motor Vehicle Maintenance b. Department of Parks, Recreation and Properties .......................... 129 1. Division of Convention Center and West Side Market 2. Division of Park Maintenance and Properties 3. Division of Property Management 4. Division of Recreation 5. Division of Parking Facilities 6. Research, Planning and Development c. Department of Public Safety ........................................................... 181 1. Division of Police
    [Show full text]
  • City of Cleveland Cuyahoga County Single Audit for The
    CITY OF CLEVELAND CUYAHOGA COUNTY SINGLE AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 CITY OF CLEVELAND CUYAHOGA COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE Schedule of Federal Awards Expenditures .................................................................................................. 1 Notes to the Schedule of Federal Awards Expenditures ............................................................................. 5 Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Required by Government Auditing Standards ........................................................................................... 7 Report on Compliance with Requirements Applicable to Each Major Program and on Internal Control over Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 ............................................................................... 9 Schedule of Findings………… .................................................................................................................... 11 Schedule of Prior Year Findings ................................................................................................................. 15 This page intentionally left blank. CITY OF CLEVELAND CUYAHOGA COUNTY CASH BASIS EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 Federal Grant/ Federal Pass Through Pass Through Grantor/ CFDA Entity Federal Program Title Number Number Expenditures Department of Agriculture Direct Programs: Summer Food Service Program for Children 2002 10.559 - 142,281 Total Department of agriculture $
    [Show full text]
  • 247 Collaborative Actions and Ideas by County
    New Release! 247 Collaborative Actions and Ideas by County The KSU Center expresses its appreciation to the Fund for our Economic Future, The Knight Foundation, and the Civic Commons for their support of this work. For more than two years, the Center for Public Administration and Public Policy at Kent State University has tracked and recorded information about collaborations among local governments in Northeastern Ohio. The Center’s goals are to identify collaborative processes, disseminate collaborative ideas, provide a foundation for developing best practices on collaboration, and en- able local governments to increase public sector efficiency and effectiveness. This collaborative summary titled “The Innovator’s Collaborative Series” provides infor- mation on the collaborative service projects the Center has identified through March 31, 2011. What should you do if you know of a Collaborative idea and it is not on the list? We are actively sharing information with the State Auditor’s office. Please go to the State Auditor’s Office Shared Services Idea Center and enter your collaborative/shared services idea at: http://www.auditor.state.oh.us/sharedservices/default.htm. For changes and corrections, please contact the Center at (330) 672-7148 or [email protected]. What are Collaborative Ideas? What are Collaborative Actions? A collaborative idea is a project involving two or more gov- A collaborative action is a project for which the Center has Ashland ernments which is in the discussion phase and for which we identified a primary source verifying collaborative activity be- have not identified primary sources verifying collaborative tween two or more government partners.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Awards Program
    EMS STAR OF LIFE PURPOSE HONOR Exceptional EMS personnel from Ohio. RECOGNIZE Ohio’s emergency medical services system and organizations for a job well done. REUNITE EMS providers with the person treated and present the actual patient scenario. GENERATE Positive media stories regarding pre-hospital care and the EMS Star of Life Awards. MAGNIFY The profile of National EMS Week in the State of Ohio. AGENDA EMS STARS 19TH ANNUAL EMS STAR OF LIFE AWARDS CEREMONY 19TH ANNUAL EMS STAR OF LIFE AWARDS CEREMONY 11:30 a.m. ..............................................................................Meet & Greet Berea Fire Department Anthony Sessin, patient 1 p.m. Welcome ............................................... Executive Director Melvin House Butler Township Fire & EMS Ohio Division of Emergency Medical Services Huber Heights Fire & EMS Ziyovaddin Azimov, patient Opening Remarks ......................................... Director Thomas J. Stickrath Ohio Department of Public Safety City of Fairfield Fire Department 1:15 p.m. ................................................................... Award Presentations Stephen Tacy, patient Executive Director Melvin House City of Middletown Division of Fire Ohio Division of Emergency Medical Services Paul Rizzo, patient EMS Agency of the Year ...................................Whitehall Division of Fire Presented by Dudley Wright, Chair Hanco EMS State Board of Emergency Medical, Fire, and Transportation Services Max Brown, patient EMS Provider of the Year .................... Asst. Chief Christopher
    [Show full text]
  • Ward 9 News ~ Winter 2019, Council Member Kevin Conwell
    Councilman Kevin Conwell | Winter 2019 The Drumbeat of the Community Councilman Conwell 2018 HIGHLIGHT • Museum of African American History Fieldtrip Opposes State Move In October, Councilman Kevin Conwell sponsored and to Loosen Gun Safety accompanied 50 Glenville High School students to the Museum of African American History in Detroit. The trip also included a tour of the Motown Museum. A great time was had by all. Ohio Statehouse in Columbus Councilman Kevin Conwell travelled to the statehouse in Columbus this month to protest against a proposed bill that would loosen gun safety standards. Councilman Conwell’s voice and the voices of hundreds of others proved to be effective as the Republican-controlled Senate backed off on a controversial provision in its original bill and instead passed a stripped-down version. “We did it,” said Councilman Conwell. “Together, we were able to back them down.” The so-called “Stand Your Ground” bill would have made it legal for an individual to shoot Ward 9 Seeing Two Major Development Projects someone in self- As part of a public/private plan by the City of Cleveland to defense without first invest millions of dollars into struggling neighborhoods, two trying to retreat to Conwell speaking at the statehouse major development projects are underway along East 105th safety. That provision, in December Street, an area represented by Councilman Kevin Conwell. which would have The Finch Group has begun construction of a mixed-use applied even to a shooting in a public place, building on East 105th Street at Ashbury Avenue near was struck down, resulting in a win for the VA Medical Center.
    [Show full text]
  • (OD2A) Yearly Evaluation Report September 1
    Cuyahoga County Board of Health Cuyahoga County Overdose Data to Action Initiative (OD2A) Yearly Evaluation Report September 1, 2019 – August 31, 2020 Funded by: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Grant Number: CDC-RFA-CE19-1904 Evaluated by: The Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research and Education Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences Case Western Reserve University 11402 Bellflower Road Cleveland, Ohio 44106 1 | P a g e Acknowledgements The Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research and Education, Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University promotes social justice and community development by conducting applied, community-based and interdisciplinary research on the causes and prevention of violence, and by educating and training social workers, teachers, law enforcement and other professionals in the principles of effective violence prevention. The Center also develops and evaluates the impact of evidence- based best practices in violence prevention and intervention, and seeks to understand the influence of mental health, substance use, youth development and related issues on violent behavior and public health. This publication was supported by grant, 5-NU17CE925005-02-00, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Department of Health and Human Services. We
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Five Year Capital Improvement JANUARY2011 Program
    2011 Five Year Capital Improvement JANUARY2011 Program REBUILDING Cleveland Photo Credits: City of Cleveland Photographic Bureau (Donn Nottage, Steve Gusky and Clare Russell) Special Thanks To: Brian Wopershall, Office of Cleveland Enterprise GIS Tarra Seifullah, Office of the Mayor Sonja Smith, Graphic Design Intern Beth Zietlow-DeJesus, Office of the Mayor 2011 Five Year Capital Improvement Program A Letter From Mayor Frank G. Jackson In January 2007, my administration re-instituted a Five Year Capital Improvement Program for the City of Cleveland and linked the Program to Connecting Cleveland 2020, the Citywide Plan. This year, we are proposing to issue $31.2 million in additional debt, which is slightly more than the amount of prior debt we will retire during the year. In developing our 2011 capital spending plan, I instructed my Cabinet officials to consider the following priorities. Reorganize for Efficiencies Our most significant expenditures in 2011— $4 million for an 800 mHZ radio system, $4.27 million for a new East Side Maintenance Facility, and $2.5 million for recycling containers—are all focused on improving the City’s operations through enhanced efficiencies. The 800 mHZ investment will address one of the City’s biggest needs for homeland security, emergency and day-to-day operations- that is the need for interoperability amongst City employees in various departments and partnering emergency response agencies. The East Side Maintenance Facility will allow the newly-formed Department of Public Works to consolidate service delivery, similar to the approach we’ve used to clean vacant lots and rights-of-way in our “Clean Cleveland” program.
    [Show full text]
  • Ogolo V. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., 2013-Ohio-4921.]
    [Cite as Ogolo v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., 2013-Ohio-4921.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99675 PETER OGOLO PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY DEFENDANT-APPELLEE JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED Civil Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CV-782057 BEFORE: Celebrezze, J., Stewart, A.J., and S. Gallagher, J. RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: November 7, 2013 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Ronald A. Apelt Apelt Law Firm, L.L.C. 20600 Chagrin Boulevard Suite 400 Shaker Heights, Ohio 44122 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE Kathleen M. Minahan Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Root-McBride Building 6th Floor 1240 West 6th Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.: {¶1} Plaintiff-appellant, Peter Ogolo, appeals from the judgment of the common pleas court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (“GCRTA”). After a careful review of the record and relevant case law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. I. Factual and Procedural History {¶2} On September 17, 2008, appellant was a passenger on a bus owned and operated by GCRTA that was traveling on Euclid Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio, when it struck a cement barrier in the road. Appellant was seated in the rear bench seat on the bus and alleges that when the bus impacted the barrier, the collision caused his head to strike the back of the plastic seat, and he subsequently tumbled forward into the aisle of the bus, landing on his left shoulder and again striking his head on the floor of the bus.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Five Year Capital Improvement Program REBUILDING Cleveland
    2015 Five Year Capital Improvement Program REBUILDING Cleveland CITY OF CLEVELAND JANUARY 2015 Mayor Frank G. Jackson Photo Credits: City of Cleveland Photographic Bureau Special Thanks To: Xander Mavrides, Cleveland | GIS Office Tarra Seifullah Petras | Office of the Mayor Annette Williams | Division of Printing and Reproduction A Letter From Mayor Frank G. Jackson This 2015 Five Year Capital Improvement Program represents our ninth annual installment since I took office in 2006. We are proposing to issue $100 million in additional bond debt in 2015: This dollar amount represents about four times the debt the City retires in an average year, and is largely driven by four major initiatives: $25 million for targeted neighborhoods, $20 million to restore the condition of the City’s vehicle fleet, over $34 million for roads and bridges, and over $20 million to repair existing facilities. In developing our capital spending plan for 2015, I have set the following priorities. Pavement Management for Roads Last year I initiated an aggressive program for the repair of the City’s worst-rated streets as measured by our pavement management ratings. Using $2 million from our 2014 bond issue, we leveraged an additional $10 in federal monies from the Northeast Ohio Area Coordinating Agency (“NOACA”) and commenced resurfacing nearly 17 miles on eight streets with a 61 average pavement condition rating. We have an equally aggressive program planned for 2015, and we are also attempting to leverage State and County monies for resurfacing projects. By 2016, we hope to have achieved resurfacing on all streets with below-70 pavement condition ratings.
    [Show full text]
  • CIVITISM Cleveland City Council’S Policy Agenda 2015 - 2017 City of Cleveland | Office of the Council Kevin J
    CIVITISM Cleveland City Council’s Policy Agenda 2015 - 2017 CITY OF CLEVELAND | Office of the Council Kevin J. Kelley Patricia J. Britt Phyllis E. Cleveland Terrell H. Pruitt Council President City Clerk, Clerk of Council Majority Leader Majority Whip Cleveland City Council Committees OF COUNCIL Development, Planning Municipal Services and Utilities and Sustainability Properties Terrell H. Pruitt - Chair Anthony Brancatelli - Chair Kenneth L. Johnson - Chair Dona Brady - Vice Chair Phyllis E. Cleveland - Vice Chair TJ Dow - Vice Chair Anthony Brancatelli Joe Cimperman Anthony Brancatelli Brian Cummins Brian Cummins Brian Cummins Martin J. Keane TJ Dow Jeffrey D. Johnson Mamie J. Mitchell Terrell H. Pruitt Brian Kazy Michael D. Polensek Matthew Zone Zachary Reed Finance Safety Workforce and Community Kevin J. Kelley - Chair Matthew Zone - Chair Benefits Phyllis E. Cleveland - Vice Chair Kevin Conwell - Vice Chair Phyllis E. Cleveland - Chair Dona Brady Joe Cimperman Matthew Zone - Vice Chair Anthony Brancatelli Brian Kazy Jeffrey D. Johnson Kevin Conwell Martin J. Keane Brian Kazy Martin J. Keane Mamie J. Mitchell Michael D. Polensek Mamie J. Mitchell Michael D. Polensek Terrell H. Pruitt Terrell H. Pruitt Zachary Reed Matthew Zone Health and Human Transportation Services Martin J. Keane - Chair Joe Cimperman - Chair TJ Dow - Vice Chair Mamie J. Mitchell - Vice Chair Kevin Conwell Dona Brady Jeffrey D. Johnson Phyllis E. Cleveland Kenneth L. Johnson Kevin Conwell Brian Kazy Brian Cummins Zachary Reed Jeffrey D. Johnson The following Committees meet at the Call of the Chair: Mayor’s Appointment TJ Dow - Chair, Dona Brady, Phyllis E. Cleveland, Kevin J. Kelley Operations Terrell H. Pruitt - Chair, Mamie J.
    [Show full text]