DOCSLIB.ORG

Prospective Year 12 Making America Tasks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prospective Year 12 Making America Tasks 18th May 2020 Dear Prospective Year 12 English Literature Students Back in March, I sent out a document with a suggested reading list to prepare you for the A Level course and to help to keep you busy during this unusual period. This list is still an important resource to help you prepare for studying Literature at Sixth Form. The Literature team now have some tasks that we wish for you to complete. We would expect students beginning the course to have completed the list of tasks below, and to bring them to class when Sixth Form begins. These are incredibly important to the work on American Literature 1880-1940, one of the units on the course. American Literature 1880-1940 When we return to Farlingaye, you will be studying two novels set in this time period. The two novels we will be studying are The Great Gatsby (F. Scott Fitzgerald) and The Grapes of Wrath (John Steinbeck). In understanding these texts, you need to understand the context of America at the time, and in understanding that, we need to understand the wider context of America leading up to 1880. Your project is to study the ‘Making America’ context (the history, society, culture etc.) up until 1880. To do this, you will: 1. Create notes (in whatever form suits you best, e.g. timelines, mind maps etc.) for each century from 1600 until 1880. More information is below, including some areas to focus you on important issues. 2. Create a reference guide for key terms. Again, information is below. Optional extension: 3. Read one of the novels, carry out some research and answer the questions. More information below. 4. Watch one of the films, carry out some research and answer the questions. More information below. Task 1: Creating notes Focus on 100 years at a time, starting with 1600, and produce an information sheet for each century. For this task and for Task 2, use the internet and videos on Youtube. At the bottom is a list of useful links to Youtube videos. Presidents and politics – any major laws? How did it affect life? How did people respond? Conflicts – between whom? Where fought? Outcome? Short and long-term consequences? Key dates? Art and culture – important artists? Cultural movements? What caused them? How did they reflect American life? Key writers? What was society like? Was there a class system? Who had power? Slavery? Cultural diversity What was life like in cities and in the country? Was there a difference between the northern states and the southern states? It may help to understand the time as these (overlapping) eras: Colonial Period (1607- 1754), Puritan Times (1650-1750), The Age of Reason (1750-1800), Romanticism (1800- 1865), Realism (1850-1900). Task 2: Creating a Reference Guide Below is a list of key moments and ideas. You need to create a glossary where you give detailed information about what each term means and what happened/how it affected people. The American Civil War and emancipation Reconstruction Era Manifest Destiny The Monroe Doctrine Jeffersonian Agrarianism Gold rush The American Dream The Constitution and the Bill of Rights Migration west- pursuit of the frontier Useful Youtube videos for Tasks 1 and 2: American history from 1600 - only use up to about 20 mins (after witch trials /expansion west): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMnXJpOYRYg 1700-1860: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-history/history- survey/us-history-survey/v/us-history-overview-1-jamestown-to-the-civil-war There is lots on the Civil War. Here is a short cartoon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9v5pY9300MQ Jeffersonian Agrarianism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxQDRRNWv3c The Monroe Doctrine and Manifest Destiny (explains how America got ‘made’ - it wasn’t just always ‘there’): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ClU_kS4uiY Manifest Destiny (shorter): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=japRb6U_FuQ The Gold rush: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDkqvqqjMAA Or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxekRM5-uMU and Oregon Trail: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iquQUhja7ec Extension tasks Whilst these are extensions, we would strongly encourage reading novels and watching films to get a strong and visceral understanding of the times. Everything you do now will benefit your A Level and will prepare you for the new term. Task 3: Book review Read one (or more!) of the following. These are from 1880-1940 time period, so just after the point you have been researching. These 60 years are the main focus of the unit. We would recommend you read a few summaries to see which novel might interest you the most. The Portrait of a Lady by Henry James (1881) The Turn of the Screw by Henry James (1898) The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain (1884) The Red Badge of Courage by Stephen Crane (1895) The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton The Call of the Wild by Jack London (1903) The Golden Bowl by Henry James (1904) The House of Mirth by Edith Wharton (1905) The Jungle by Upton Sinclair (1906) Three Lives by Gertrude Stein (1909) My Antonia by Willa Cather (1918) The Magnificent Ambersons by Booth Tarkington (1918) Winesburg, Ohio by Sherwood Anderson (1919) Main Street by Sinclair Lewis (1920) Autobiography of an Ex-Coloured Man by James Weldon Johnson (1921) Cane by Jean Toomer (1923) An American Tragedy by Theodore Dresier (1925) The Sun Also Rises by Ernest Hemingway (1926) The Bridge of the San Luis Rey by Thornton Wilder (1927) Home to Harlem by Claude McKay (1928) The Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner (1929) Look Homeward, Angel by Thomas Wolfe (1929) The Maltese Falcon by Dashiell Hammett (1930) Flowering Judas and Other Stories by Katherine Porter (1930) The Good Earth by Pearl S. Buck (1931) Call It Sleep by Henry Roth (1934) The Tropic of Cancer by Henry Miller (1934) Appointment in Samarra by John O’Hara (1934) The USA Trilogy by John Dos Passos (1936) Gone with the Wind by Margaret Mitchell (1936) Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston (1937) Day of the Locust by Nathaniel West (1939) The Big Sleep by Raymond Chandler (1939) Native Son by Richard Wright (1940) The Heart is a Lonely Hunter by Carson McCullers (1940) Carry out some research into: The novel’s time and geographical settings and relevant context The author’s life Answer these questions: When was the novel written/set? Who is narrating? If it is first person, what are their views? How is the text structured? Is it chronological or is the narrative interrupted? Why? What is the writer’s language like? Do they use any repeated images or motifs? How are different types of characters presented? E.g. Are there different expectations for the behaviour of men and women? What about wealth or class? Are any characters prejudiced against? What hardships are there? What about technology? Can you see any similarities or differences to anything else you have read? How has context affected the novel? Can you explain why a character behaves a certain way or how ideas or beliefs have come about? Task 4: Film Review Watch one (or more!) of the following… (The brackets show the era the film roughly covers) The New World (1607 ‘onwards’) The Scarlet Letter (1660s) The Crucible (1690s) The Last Of The Mohicans (1757 ‘onwards’) 12 Years A Slave (1841) Gone With The Wind (1861 ‘onwards’) Amistad (1839 ‘onwards’) Harriet (1840s) Lincoln (1860s) Gettysburg (1860s) Glory (1860s) The Age Of Innocence (1870s) Far and Away (1890s) The Untouchables (1930s) Of Mice and Men (1930s) On The Waterfront (Late 1940s –early 1950s) Malcolm X (1940s onwards) Wall Street (1980s) Do The Right Thing (1989/1990) Boyhood (2000 onwards) Carry out some research: The film’s time and geographical settings and relevant contexts. Answer these questions: When was the film set/made? Who is the main character? What is their life like and are we encouraged to empathize with them? How is the film structured? Is it chronological or is the narrative interrupted? Why? How are different types of characters presented? E.g. Are there different expectations for the behaviour of men and women? What about wealth or class? Are any characters prejudiced against? What hardships are there? What about technology? Can you see any similarities or differences to anything else you have read/watched? How has context affected the film? Can you explain why a character behaves a certain way or how ideas or beliefs have come about? We hope you enjoy these tasks and that you feel like your understanding of this country and its culture is growing. Best wishes Miss Kerridge and the Literature Team .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unraveling Native Son: Propagating Communism) Racial Hatred) Societal Change Or None of the Above??
    IUSB Graduate Journal Ill 1 Unraveling Native Son: Propagating Communism) Racial Hatred) Societal Change or None of the Above?? by:jacqueline Becker Department of English ABSTRACT: This paper explores the many different ways in which Communism is portrayed within Richard Wright's novel Native Son. It also seeks to illustrate that regardless of the reasoning behind the conflicted portrayal of Communism, within the text, it does serve a vital purpose, and that is to illustrate to the reader that there is no easy answer or solution for the problems facing society. Bigger and his actions cannot be simply dismissed as a product of a damaged society, nor can Communism be seen as an all-encompassing saving grace that will fix all of societies woes. Instead, this novel, seeks to illustrate the type of people that can be produced in a society divided by racial class lines. It shows what can happen when one oppressed group feels as though they have no power over their own lives. I have attempted to illustrate that what Wright ultimately achieved, through his novel Native Son, is to illuminate to readers of the time that a serious problem existed within their society, specifically in Chicago within the "Black Belt" and that the solution lies not with one social group or political party, not through senseless violence, but rather through changes in policy. ~Research~ 2 lll Jacqueline Becker Unraveling Native Son: Propagating Communism) Racial Hatred) Societal Change or None of the Above?? ichard Wright's novel, Native Son, presents Communism in many different lights. On the one hand, the pushy nature R of Jan and Mary, two white characters trying to share their beliefs about an equal society under Communism, by forcing Bigger, the black protagonist, to dine and drink with them, is ultimately what leads to Mary's death.
    [Show full text]
  • How Bigger Was Born Anew
    Fall 2020 29 ow Bier as Born new datation Reuration and Double Consciousness in Nambi E elle’s Native Son Isaiah Matthew Wooden This essay analyzes Nambi E. Kelley’s stage adaptation of Native Son to consider the ways tt Aicn Aeicn is itlie by n constitte to cts o etion t sharpens particular focus on how Kelley reinvigorates Wright’s novel’s searing social and cil cities by ctiely ein te oisin etpo o oble consciosness n iin ne o, enin, n se to te etpo, elleys Native Son extends the debates about “the problem of the color line” that Du Bois’s writing helped engender at te beinnin o te tentiet centy into te tentyst n, in so oin, opens citicl space to reckon with the persistent and pernicious problem of anti-Black racism. ewords adaptation, refguration, double consciousness, Native Son, Nambi E. Kelley This essay takes as a central point of departure the claim that African American drama is vitalized by and, indeed, constituted through acts of refguration. It is such acts that endow the remarkably capacious genre with any sense or semblance of coherence. Retion is notably a word with multiple signifcations. It calls to mind processes of representation and recalculation. It also points to matters of meaning-making and modifcation. The pref re does important work here, suggesting change, alteration, or even improvement. For the purposes of this essay, I use etion to refer to the strategies, practices, methods, and techniques that African American dramatists deploy to transform or give new meaning to certain ideas, concepts, artifacts, and histories, thereby opening up fresh interpretive and defnitional possibilities and, when appropriate, prompting much-needed reckonings.
    [Show full text]
  • Organizing Thoughts Through Notetaking Part 2 – Reading
    Summer Reading Assignment 2021-2022 Honors American Literature | Oakland Catholic High School Introduction* For your summer reading assignment, you will have the chance to explore diverse ideas through a variety of texts and to respond to your reading and thinking through creative notetaking. You will need to purchase print copies (no ebooks) of three texts, listed in the assignment below. You may purchase these texts from a variety of sources, including traditional and online booksellers. Next to the text required texts (The Joy Luck Club and Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother) the appropriate ISBN number is listed. Please purchase that particular copy of the text to streamline page numbers. All the parts of this assignment are due the first week of school. Please bring all three purchased texts to school the first day of class. Part 1 – Organizing thoughts through notetaking Text – The StudyTee video on YouTube, “How I take notes (neat and effective)”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amVHBIhWwCo. Assignment: - Think about how organizing notes can help your study of literature. Get a notebook or binder of your choice with the style of paper that you prefer (lined, graph, blank, bullet point, etc.) You will use this notebook to create notes for your summer reading books as well as the major works that we study, so find one that you really like. Why it is important – Often, we can feel disorganized when we learn something new. We may feel “lost” or overwhelmed by seemingly unconnected details. To combat this, notetaking consolidates new information into organized, categorized, visually-appealing formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Wright and Ralph Ellison: Conflicting Masculinities
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1994 Richard Wright and Ralph Ellison: Conflicting Masculinities H. Alexander Nejako College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the American Literature Commons Recommended Citation Nejako, H. Alexander, "Richard Wright and Ralph Ellison: Conflicting Masculinities" (1994). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625892. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-nehz-v842 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RICHARD WRIGHT AND RALPH ELLISON: CONFLICTING MASCULINITIES A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of English The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by H. Alexander Nejako 1994 ProQuest Number: 10629319 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10629319 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Son (Questions)
    Native Son (Questions) 1 Wright writes of Bigger Thomas: “these were the rhythms of his life; indifference and violence; periods of abstract brooding and periods of intense desire; moments of silence and moments of anger” … Does Wright intend us to relate to Bigger as a human being – or has he deliberately made him an embodiment of oppressive social and political forces? Is there anything admirable about Bigger? Does he change by the end of the book? 2 James Baldwin, an early protégé of Wright’s, later attacked the older writer for his self-righteousness and reliance on stereo-types… In his famous essay “Everybody’s Protest Novel” Baldwin compared Bigger to Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom, and dismissed Native Son as “protest” fiction. Do you agree? 3 When Bigger stands confronted by his family in jail, he thinks… they ought to be glad he was a murderer; “had he not taken on himself the crime of being black?” Talk about Bigger as a victim and sacrificial figure. If Wright wanted us to pity Bigger, why did he portray him as so brutal? 4 How dated does this book seem in its depiction of racial hatred and guilt? Have we as a society moved beyond the rage and hostility that Wright depicts between blacks and whites? Or are we still living in a culture that could produce a figure like Bigger Thomas? https://www.litlovers.com/reading-guides/fiction/719-native-son-wright?start=3 Native Son (About the Author) Author: Richard Wright Born: September 4, 1908 Where: near Natchez, MS Education: Smith-Robertson Junior High, Jackson MS Died: November 28, 1960 Where: Paris, France Richard Wright was the first 20th century African-American writer to command both critical acclaim and popular success.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Green Foundation
    Paul Green Foundation NEWS – October 2017 Native Son’s New Adaptation PAUL GREEN ANNUAL MEETING Playwright Nambi Kelley NOVEMBER 4, 2017 has written plays for NC BOTANICAL GARDEN Steppenwolf, Goodman Theatre and Lincoln Center CHAPEL HILL, NC and most recently was named playwright-in-residence at The 2017 the National Black Theatre in New York. Kelley’s adaptation of Native Son was National Theatre Conference presented to critical acclaim for the premiere December 1-3 in New York City production at the Court Theatre/American Blues Each year the National Theatre Conference Festival. Since that first production it has been Person of the Year names the Paul Green produced in New York, California, Georgia and Award winner. This year’s Person of the Year – Arizona, and published by Samuel French in 2016. Molly Smith selected June Schreiner, a highly The Green Foundation joined with the Wright acclaimed young actor. Since 1989, the Paul Estate to sanction these productions. Green Foundation has honored a “young theatre professional” with this Paul Green Award. A bit of history: Paul Green and Richard Wright’s Native Son that opened on March 24, Founded in 1925, the National Theatre 1941, at the St. James Theatre in New York City, Conference is a not-for-profit organization made was produced by Orson Welles and John up of distinguished members of the American Houseman. Of the very serious disagreement that Theatre Community; Green was instrumental in ensued between Green and Wright, Dr. Laurence the founding the organization and served as Avery, Professor Emeritus, UNC-Chapel Hill president in the early years.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture and Society in Edith Wharton's the Age of Innocence
    "The Intolerable Ugliness of New York": Architecture and Society in Edith Wharton's The Age of Innocence Cynthia G. Falk Edith Wharton's novel The Age of Innocence was written in and about an era characterized in the United States by immense political, economic, and cul­ tural change, which led many Americans to reevaluate how they defined their country and themselves. As an expatriate, Wharton worked on the manuscript in France in the years just after World War I amidst ongoing debates about the Treaty of Versailles, wartime reparations, and the creation of the League of Nations. The work was received by the American public first in the summer of 1920, when it appeared in serial form in the magazine Pictorial Review, and again later that fall, when it was published as a novel. The story was set almost fifty years earlier in the New York and Newport, Rhode Island, of Wharton's youth. Through her descriptions of that earlier period's built environment and social conventions, Wharton drew conclusions about American society that car­ ried added weight in her own day. Wharton's assessment of architecture, inte­ rior design, and codes of conduct in late-nineteenth-century America distanced her from many of her American contemporaries by demonstrating her disillu­ sionment with her increasingly influential homeland. From the conclusion of the Civil War to the conclusion of World War I, Americans saw their country transformed. At the beginning of the period, the United States was still recovering from the destruction and division that resulted from sectional crisis. Violent conflicts with American Indians regularly threat- 0026-3079/2001/4202-019$2.50/0 American Studies, 42:2 (Summer 2001): 19-43 19 20 Cynthia G.
    [Show full text]
  • Edith Wharton. the Age of Innocence
    EDITH WHARTON I ventured to choose The Age oflnnocence as a kind of retrospectíve prologue to our discussions. Edith Wharton, bom in 1862, belonged to a middle generation between, on the one hand, Henry James and William Dean Howells, and on the other, most of the novelists of the twenties whom we shall be discussing. The Age of Innocence won the Pulitzer Prize in 1921, the year after it appeared, in competition with Sinclair Lewis' Main Street. And even then it was of course very much of a period piece. Most of it takes place during the 1870's, with the last chapter, the epilogue, taking place just after the tum of the century. Edith Wharton had gone through the various stages of her upper- class girlhood in oíd New York; had made her social debut, and then liberated herself to begin her career, to Uve abroad mostly and to become in her later years a Grande Dame of American letters. She had been alerted to her subject by Henry James, and let me read you the advice from James' letter. The Jamesian characteristics that you notice in his literary style are even more prominent when he writes in his own person: Let it suffer the wrong of being crudely hinted at as my desire [he doesn't say "I want," and you'll notice he uses the passive tense: very impersonal, but he's talking about himself] eamestly, tenderly, intelligently [he piles up the words as if he were groping] to admonish you while you are young, free, expert, exposed (to illumination) -by which I mean while you're in full command of the situation- admonish you, I say, in favor of the American subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting Unhappy Women in Edith Wharton's Novels Min-Jung Lee
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2008 Interpreting Unhappy Women in Edith Wharton's Novels Min-Jung Lee Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES INTERPRETING UNHAPPY WOMEN IN EDITH WHARTON‟S NOVELS BY MIN-JUNG LEE A Dissertation submitted to the Department of English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2008 The members of the Committee approve the Dissertation of Min-Jung Lee defended on October 29, 2008. ____________________________ Dennis Moore Professor Directing Dissertation ____________________________ Jennifer Koslow Outside Committee ____________________________ Ralph Berry Committee Member ____________________________ Jerrilyn McGregory Committee Member Approved: Ralph Berry, Chair, Department of English ii ACKNOWLEGMENTS I embarked on writing this dissertation with fear, excitement, and a realization of the discipline that was going to be needed. While there were difficulties and mistakes made along the way, there are many people whose help has been instrumental. Without the support and guidance of my major professor, Dennis Moore, completion of this dissertation would not be possible. I will always be indebted for his keen insight into my project. Prof. Ralph Berry provided a critical eye and also a generous heart during the early stage of this work and challenged me to make this project worthwhile. He was always aware of my weaknesses and strengths and guided me in making this dissertation into the one that I wanted it to be. I am also very grateful for the commentary and the warm heart of Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Black Male's Quest for Identity As Illustrated Through
    Understanding the Black Male’s Quest for Identity as Illustrated through Native Son Martez Files The history of African-American writing merger will make them quest their own real is a complex subject. Since the foregrounding of identity, because they have become the emptied this literary canon there have been writers who out shell.” He contends that because Blackness is have attempted to present African-Americans as so diverse and Whiteness is so sovereign that Black agents of their social realities. These writers have people are becoming lost in the White world literally had to write Black people into history because their various character traits are because societal norms, historically, dehumanized suppressed by the oppressive presence of this group into anonymity. Some of the first Whiteness. His argument is one in which he writings of African-Americans that gained national presents Blacks as an “emptied-out shell” and attention are the ex-slave narratives which offer the another in which he echoes the sentiment that reader some clues as to what the human experience Whites are “sovereign,” meaning they reign of suffering was like for these people. In many supreme, even in Black literature. ways Black writers have mimicked the tradition of One might contend that Nejad does not take depicting Black characters battling human into account that this “emptied-out shell” to which experiences. Richard Wright is no different in he refers is not influenced first by White these literary pursuits as he also, expressly, sovereignty but by that of a Black parental figure. humanizes his characters. Nonetheless, some This is true in many African-American writings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Communist Propaganda Towards American Black
    A COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA TOWARDS AMERICAN BLACK SOCIETY THROUGH RICHARD WRIGHT’S NATIVE SON Skripsi Disusun dalam Rangka Menyelesaikan Studi Strata 1 untuk memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Pendidikan Oleh Nama : Erik Harninta Putra NIM : 2250402039 Program Studi : S1 Jurusan : Sastra Inggris FAKULTAS BAHASA DAN SASTRA UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG 2006 APPROVAL The final project was approved by the Board of Examiners of the English Department of the Faculty of Languages and Arts of Semarang State University on………………… Board of Examiners 1. Chairman, Drs. Triyanto, M. A. NIP. 131281218 2. Secretary, Dra. Dwi Anggani L. B, M.Pd. NIP. 131813665 3. First Examiner, Dra. Indrawati, M. Hum. NIP. 131568990 4. Second Examiner as Second Adviser, Hendrikus Joko Yulianto, S. S, M. Hum. NIP. 132233485 5. Third Examiner as First Adviser, Dra. Rahayu Puji H., M. Hum. NIP. 132158715 Approved by Dean of the Faculty of Languages and Arts, Prof. Dr. Rustono, M. Hum NIP. 131281222 iii PERNYATAAN Dengan ini saya: Nama : Erik Harninta Putra NIM : 2250402039 Prodi/Jurusan : Sastra Inggris , Jurusan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris FBS UNNES menyatakan dengan sesungguhnya bahwa final project yang berjudul: A COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA TOWARDS AMERICAN BLACK SOCIETY THROUGH RICHARD WRIGHT’S NATIVE SON yang saya tulis dalam rangka memenuhi salah satu syarat memperoleh gelar sarjana ini benar-benar merupakan karya saya sendiri yang saya hasilkan setelah melalui penelitian, pembimbingan, diskusi, dan pemaparan/ujian. Semua kutipan, baik yang langsung maupun tidak langsung, baik yang diperoleh dari sumber keperpustakaan, maupun sumber lainnya, telah disertai keterangan mengenai identitas sumbernya dengan cara sebagaimana yang lazim dalam penulisan karya ilmiah. Dengan demikian, walaupun tim penguji dan pembimbing penulisan final project ini membubuhkan tandatangan sebagaimana keabsahannya, seluruh karya ilmiah ini tetap menjadi tanggung jawab saya sendiri.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Beware of Elites Bearing Theories': Clarence Thomas on Race And
    Journal of Education & Social Policy Vol. 2, No. 1; March 2015 ‘Beware of Elites Bearing Theories’: Clarence Thomas on Race and Education William S. New, PhD Department of Education and Youth Studies Beloit College Beloit, WI 53511 Michael S. Merry, PhD Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands Abstract No matter one's political loyalties, it seems worthwhile to take seriously Clarence Thomas’s ideas about education because over the past twenty-five years most have acquired the force of law. This article explains Thomas’ views on the legitimacy and efficacy of affirmative action as a remedy to educational segregation. It also addresses his views on integration/segregation and diversity, the developments of which are intimately tied to affirmative action. Each is related to ever-shifting definitions and deployments of the notion of colorblindness. Understanding Clarence Thomas with respect to education requires an examination of his biography, as paradigmatic of many black male experiences in the second half of the 20th century. The article argues that it is unproductive to claim that Thomas’ conservatism in the realm of racial politics is either irrational or exceptional. That does not equate, however, to championing Thomas’ positions on affirmative action, diversity, and integration. Keywords: supreme court, affirmative action, segregation, educational law, colorblindness "There is nothing you can do to get past black skin ... I don't care how educated you are, how good you are at what you do – you'll never have the same contacts or opportunities, you'll never be seen as equal to whites." – Clarence Thomas, quoted by Juan Williams (1987) It would be fair to say that no black public figure in the past thirty years has been the target of more unapologetically racial slurs by liberals than Clarence Thomas.
    [Show full text]