AIA COD Final Book Layout for United.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rainier Square Development DRAFT
Rainier Square Development University of Washington Metropolitan Tract Addendum to Final Environmental Impact Statement Downtown Height and Density Changes January 2005 Master Use Permit Project No. 3017644 City of Seattle Department of Planning and Development February 11, 2015 DRAFT FOR CITY STAFF REVIEW 0NLY Prepared by: Parametrix Inc. Environmental Impact Statement Addendum Addendum to ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for the Downtown Height and Density Changes January 2005 Addressing Environmental Impacts of Rainier Square Development University of Washington Metropolitan Tract Rainier Square Redevelopment Master Use Permit # 3017644 City of Seattle Department of Planning and Development This Environmental Impact Statement Addendum has been prepared in compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) of 1971 (Chapter 43.21C, Revised Code of Washington); the SEPA Rules, effective April 4, 1984, as amended (Chapter 197-11 Washington Administrative Code); and rules adopted by the City of Seattle implementing SEPA – Seattle’s Environmental Policies and Procedures Code (Chapter 25.05, Seattle Municipal Code). The Seattle Department of Planning and Development (DPD). DPD has determined that this document has been prepared in a responsible manner using appropriate methodology and DPD has directed the areas of research and analysis that were undertaken in preparation of this DSEIS. This document is not an authorization for an action, nor does it constitute a decision or a recommendation for an action. Date of Issuance of this EIS Addendum .............................................DATE Rainier Square Development i University of Washington Metropolitan Tract Environmental Impact Statement Addendum Cite as: City of Seattle Department of Planning and Development University of Washington Metropolitan Tract Rainier Square Redevelopment February 2015 Addendum to Final Environmental Impact Statement Downtown Height and Density Proposal, January 2005 Prepared by Parametrix Inc., Seattle, WA. -
High Performance Design
HIGH-PERFORMANCE ENVIRONMENTS Corporate Practice NBBJ’S CORPORATE PRACTICE What we can do for you Best Practices Corporate Environments & Campus Planning: We understand that corporate environments are constantly changing and we recognize that effective design must enable flexibility, and fresh Our Services ideas. Your space is both an asset fostering discovery and an integral business strategy tool, Design linking people and technology to learning, innovation and collaboration. We believe that form Architecture follows human need. Our process differs from other firms’ in that we measure the performance Branding of people, not space. We understand that designing a campus requires thoughtful planning and Environmental Graphics innovative problem-solving tailored to your business and unique culture. Interior Design Landscape Design Visioning: This very effective method engages all the key stakeholders early in a project and Lighting Design provides an outlet for identifying each of these individuals’ ideas and visions for the new Tenant Improvements work environment. NBBJ has developed several visioning activities that can be customized Planning depending on your culture and goals of the project. Feasibility Studies Who we are Establishing Design Principles: Building upon the principles of your already established Master Planning workplace guidelines, early engagement with the user group or user representatives to establish Facility Planning We Embrace and Empower Meaningful Change Workplace Strategy project-specific design principles provides everyone, including the future occupants, with a NBBJ is a different kind of design practice, one that helps baseline understanding and guide for the goals and intentions of the new office environment. Consulting our clients drive innovation by creating highly productive, Throughout design, these principles serve as the compass and allow for consistent reasoning Change Management sustainable spaces that free people to live, learn, work and in the decision-making process. -
The Things They've Done : a Book About the Careers of Selected Graduates
The Things They've Done A book about the careers of selected graduates ot the Rice University School of Architecture Wm. T. Cannady, FAIA Architecture at Rice For over four decades, Architecture at Rice has been the official publication series of the Rice University School of Architecture. Each publication in the series documents the work and research of the school or derives from its events and activities. Christopher Hight, Series Editor RECENT PUBLICATIONS 42 Live Work: The Collaboration Between the Rice Building Workshop and Project Row Houses in Houston, Texas Nonya Grenader and Danny Samuels 41 SOFTSPACE: From a Representation of Form to a Simulation of Space Sean tally and Jessica Young, editors 40 Row: Trajectories through the Shotgun House David Brown and William Williams, editors 39 Excluded Middle: Toward a Reflective Architecture and Urbanism Edward Dimendberg 38 Wrapper: 40 Possible City Surfaces for the Museum of Jurassic Technology Robert Mangurian and Mary-Ann Ray 37 Pandemonium: The Rise of Predatory Locales in the Postwar World Branden Hookway, edited and presented by Sanford Kwinter and Bruce Mau 36 Buildings Carios Jimenez 35 Citta Apperta - Open City Luciano Rigolin 34 Ladders Albert Pope 33 Stanley Saitowitz i'licnaei Bell, editor 26 Rem Koolhaas: Conversations with Students Second Editior Sanford Kwinter, editor 22 Louis Kahn: Conversations with Students Second Edition Peter Papademitriou, editor 11 I I I I I IIII I I fo fD[\jO(iE^ uibn/^:j I I I I li I I I I I II I I III e ? I I I The Things They've DoVie Wm. -
Library Board Approves Architect for Major Building Project
PRESS RELEASE Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2014 CONTACTS: Gregg Dodd, Marketing Director Columbus Metropolitan Library (614) 849-1043 office, (614) 205-7816 cell [email protected] www.columbuslibrary.org Ben Zenitsky, Marketing & Communications Specialist Columbus Metropolitan Library (614) 849-1045 office, (614) 315-3766 cell [email protected] www.columbuslibrary.org Library Board approves architect for major building project COLUMBUS—Columbus Metropolitan Library’s (CML) Board of Trustees today unanimously approved the selection of NBBJ as the architect for the design of the new Northside Branch. The building currently housing the Northside Branch will be demolished, and a new building will be constructed in its place. Work is expected to begin in 2015 and be completed in 2016. CML intends to identify a temporary location to serve Northside Branch customers during construction. The current Northside Branch, located at 1423 N. High St., was constructed in 1990 and has 7,728 square feet of space. The new branch is expected to be more than triple in size, with approximately 27,000 square feet once completed. NBBJ was previously hired to design CML’s new Driving Park Branch, which opened to the public on July 12, and its new Dublin Branch, expected to open in 2016. NBBJ creates innovative places and experiences for organizations worldwide, and designs communities, buildings and environments that enhance people's lives. Founded in 1943, NBBJ is an industry leader in healthcare and corporate facilities and has a strong presence in the commercial, civic, science, education and sports markets. It has won numerous awards and has been recognized as one of the “greenest” architecture firms in the U.S. -
AAR Magazine Spring Summer 2021`
AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME MAGAZINE SPRING/ SUMMER 2021 A Message from the Chair of the Board of Trustees It’s hard to believe it’s been over a year since the world paused. Thank you for your continued com- mitment to AAR in what I’m sure we will remember as one of society’s most challenging moments. Your time, expertise, guidance, and financial support have all been instrumental in seeing the Academy through this period. I’d also like to thank Mark Robbins and the whole team, especially those on the ground in Rome, for their incredible dedication to navigating the ups, downs, and surprises this past year has brought. Turning to today, the Academy has successfully reopened and the selection process for next year’s fellowship class is complete. AAR is in a much stronger position than I could have imagined when the full pandemic crisis became clear in March 2020. Our finances are stable and (with vaccinations) we believe that by the fall our activities will be close to fully restored. One of the many downsides of this past year has been the lack of direct connection, and we look for- ward to future gatherings in person, here and in Rome. With appreciation and gratitude, Cary Davis Chair, AAR Board of Trustees SPRING/SUMMER 2021 UP FRONT FEATURES 2 20 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT SEEING THE ANCIENT WORLD AAR receives major gift of photographs 4 by Carole Raddato FAR AFIELD Checking in with past Fellows and Residents 24 GIVING FOR THE AGES 6 Richard E. Spear and Athena Tacha INTRODUCING underwrite a new Rome Prize The 2020–2021 Rome Prize winners -
Amazon Feature-2017Q4.Pdf
AMERESCO MICROGRIDS: Amazon system delivers data center waste heat The e-commerce giant will achieve net-zero energy at its Seattle headquarters RELIABLE, through an innovative partnership with a downtown neighbor. Tom Marseille, PE, Hon. AIA, LEED Fellow, Senior Vice President and Director of Built Ecology, WSP USA SECURE ENERGY. Photo Shutterstock. Amazon headquarters campus, Seattle. chieving net-zero energy on providing the data center building owner, of this otherwise wasted heat can be Ameresco develops flexible, scalable microgrids, building projects is becoming an Clise Properties, with a way to utilize its transferred to the online retailer’s district increasingly realistic goal given excess heat. energy system. providing secure energy systems that utilize a Acurrent and emerging building technologies, design approaches and A CREATIVE COLLABORATION combination of renewable power generation, more engaged and educated occupants. Amazon’s new 1.1 million-sq-ft UP TO 5 MW OF OTHERWISE WASTED energy conservation and load reduction measures But even with a well-charted and proven Doppler building was occupied in late HEAT CAN BE TRANSFERRED TO AMAZON’S road map, the majority of projects face 2015 as the first phase of a planned DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM. tailored to each customer’s individual needs. inherent constraints that hinder the buildout on the three-block Denny Tri- aggressive pursuit of net zero at scale. angle campus. It will ultimately comprise Fortunately, new district paradigms are three high-rise towers, each at approxi- Amazon has contracted to purchase emerging that are practical and achiev- mately 37 stories with its own meeting this data center waste heat through a able. -
AIA Seattle 2016 Annual Report
AIA Seattle 2016 Annual Report Contents Letter from the Executive Director + President 2 Vision I: Society 4 Vision II: Profession 7 Vision III: Membership 10 Vision IV: Organization + Financials 13 Corporate Allied Parners 14 Staff + Board of Directors 15 AIA Seattle Executive Director Lisa Richmond and 2015-2016 President Mary Johnston 2 A year of transformation AIA Seattle illustrates the power we have to make positive change in our profession, our city and the nation when we come together with shared purpose. 3 2016 was a year of transformation for An elevated public profile aided our the lowering of dues for all members in AIA Seattle. With the opening of the advocacy efforts in 2016 on a range of our state. As a part of the restructuring, new Center for Architecture & Design, issues from affordable housing to design AIA Northwest Washington merged we have entered a new era of public review to carbon taxes. We successfully to become a section of AIA Seattle, engagement, demonstrating the value defeated an initiative to undo plans for streamlining overhead and combining of architectural thinking to our thriving our central waterfront, and engaged resources, while allowing members in community. public officials in conversations about the Northwest section to host their own urban design. Hiring a new staff position programs, awards and member events. When the Center opened in early dedicated to advocacy will grow this 2016, we hoped to create a place of work in 2017. As we move into the uncertainty of 2017, engagement, learning and influence, we are poised to make an impact and where members and the public would Our robust peer-to-peer professional prepared to adapt and thrive. -
Theodore B. Wells and the Firm of Wells-Denbrook Architects in North Dakota; 1923-1978
Theodore B. Wells and the firm of Wells-Denbrook Architects in North Dakota; 1923-1978 historic context study prepared by Steve C. Martens; Architect Architectural Historian (August 29, 2015 Revised Final version with GF HPC comments and State Review Board comments addressed) for the Grand Forks Historic Preservation Commission and the State Historic Preservation Office, State Historical Society of North Dakota Executive summary/Abstract: Theodore B. (Burfield) Wells had established his architectural practice in Grand Forks by 1923. He was joined in practice soon after World War II by Myron Denbrook. In approximately 1949, Denbrook was offered a full partnership. The firm completed extensive work throughout the Upper Red River Valley and in northeastern North Dakota. To a lesser extent, their work is found throughout North Dakota and in the northwestern corner of Minnesota. Wells retired from active practice in about 1964 and Denbrook associated briefly with Edward Adams at about that time. This context focuses on North Dakota work designed by the firm of Theodore B. Wells and later as Wells-Denbrook, from the firm’s inception until Wells, Denbrook, Adams, Wagner Architects merged to form EAPC (engineers and architects) in 1978. Required components of the context study: 1. Context narrative 2. Research methodology for review of archival resources 3. Research methodology for evaluating extant buildings on-site 4. Criteria for evaluating a property’s merit for future inclusion in the National Register 5. Defined scope of work for a future intensive level survey of extant Wells-Denbrook buildings in the state of North Dakota Part 1: 1. Archival research and review of archival collections of work by Theodore B. -
Robert George Reichert, Architect Jeffrey Scott Murdock a Thesis
Robert George Reichert, Architect Jeffrey Scott Murdock a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, Architecture University of Washington 2019 Committee: Brian McLaren Jeffrey Ochsner Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Architecture ©2019 Jeffrey Scott Murdock University of Washington ABSTRACT Robert George Reichert, Architect Jeffrey Scott Murdock Supervisory Committee: Brian McLaren and Jeffrey Ochsner Department of Architecture Robert George Reichert, Seattle architect, practiced as a sole proprietor in the city from 1952 until his death in 1996. He learned both to design and to play the organ at a very young age, and developed strong ideas about the meaning of architecture, notions that would guide his practice throughout his career. He studied under Walter Gropius at Harvard during a period of rationalist education and practice. Practicing in a vibrant architectural culture in post-World War II Seattle, Reichert chose a solitary path in which he believed the meaning of his work was romantic and spiritual, and his individual projects could be described in terms of their affective content rather than purely functionalist design. This thesis tells the story of Reichert’s life and career, drawing primarily on original documents in the Reichert Collection at the University of Washington Libraries Special Collections. The thesis places this iconoclastic artist-architect in the context of his time and place and seeks to frame his architecture and thought in a wider context. TOC.1 Robert George Reichert. (Robert Reichert Collection, UW Libraries Special Collections UW39850). Contents Preface 7 1. Introduction 19 2. An Architectural Education 25 3. -
Spotlight on NBBJ Seattle
Ideate Software Presents: Spotlight on NBBJ Seattle Solution Toolkit: Autodesk® Revit® Architecture, Autodesk® AutoCAD,® Studies in Success Microsoft® Excel,® Ideate BIMLink, and Ideate Explorer for Revit Ideate Software customer NBBJ faces daily challenges in its complex and sophisticated design work. The firm is maximizing its BIM advantage with Ideate Software – Revit tools that improve information flow, facilitate collaboration and make managing BIM data faster and easier. Ideate BIMLink Advantages n Saves Valuable Time n Enhances Revit Workflow n Reaches needed Revit data n Frees talented staff from data entry – because it is automated and accurate “ …labeling and schedul- via Microsoft Excel ing 9,000 curtain panels… n Complements the features of Autodesk Revit Architecture, Autodesk Revit Structure, impossible to do without and Autodesk Revit MEP Ideate BIMLink.” Challenges Answered With Ideate BIMLink — Richard Sachs, Labeling and Scheduling Project BIM Coordinator, Richard Sachs, Project BIM Coordinator, NBBJ, Seattle, Washington, has been in the NBBJ, Seattle, WA, USA process of sequentially labeling and scheduling 9,000 curtain panels. As he says, “It would have been impossible to do without Ideate BIMLink. “We needed to schedule the host wall cardinal direction, the host wall Type and unique ID, all data that Autodesk Revit does not allow you direct access to in schedule or tags. I could only push this information in to the curtain panels with Ideate BIMLink. “Revit failed to properly schedule the floor level of the panel -
Landmark NOMINATION Application Name: Year Built: 1965-67 (Phase O
Landmark NOMINATION Application Name: Year Built: 1965-67 (Phase One); 1970-71 (Phase Two) (Common, present or historic) Historic – Battelle Memorial Institute Seattle Research Center Present – Talaris Conference Center Street and Number: 4000 NE 41st Street, Seattle, Washington 98105 Assessor’s File No. 1525049010 ________________________________ Legal Description: See attached _________________________________ Plat Name: Town of Yesler Block: n/a Lot: Government Lot 2 Present Owner: 4000 Property, LLC. Present Use: Conference Center Address: 4000 NE 41st Street , Seattle, WA 98105 __________________ Original Owner: Battelle Memorial Institute (BMI) ___________________ Original Use: Research/Institutional Campus __________________________ Architect: NBBJ, Inc.; Rich Haag Associates, Landscape Architect _____ Builder: Farwest Construction Company Description: Present and original (if known) physical appearance and characteristics See attached Landmark Nomination Report Statement of significance: See attached Landmark Nomination Report Photographs: See attached Landmark Nomination Report for graphics—maps, plans and photographs Submitted by: Friends of Battelle/Talaris, contact: Janice Sutter Phone 206.683.9280 Address 4616 25th Ave NE, #146, Seattle, WA 98105 Date March 28, 2013 (revised August 5, 2013) Reviewed Date Historic Preservation Officer Legal Description for Battelle Memorial Institute/Talaris (attachment to Landmark Nomination Application Form) That portion of Government Lot 2 and of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter -
Download Transcript (PDF)
1. Modern Talk: NW Mid-Century Modern Architects Oral History Project 2. Fred Bassetti interview 3. Track 1 4. Fred Bassetti 5. Eugenia Woo 6. Eugenia: Today is Wednesday, January 30th, 2008 and we’re here with Mr. Fred Bassetti, architect. The interviewer is Eugenia Woo from Docomomo WEWA, and we’re at Jack Straw Studios in Seattle. Mr. Bassetti, thank you so much for taking the time today to talk with us. 7. Fred: Not at all, glad to do so. (soft laughter) 8. Eugenia: I was wondering, can you tell me a bit about what led you to study architecture? Did you have family members or mentors that led you to that? 9. Fred: No, unlike so many things in life, it was an accident. I had enrolled at the University of Washington in engineering. This is way back in the 30s last year, right in the middle of the depression—1936. It had never occurred to me to do architecture; I had always thought I’d be an engineer. And so I enrolled in 1936, but the end of the first quarter, my grades were all at the bottom of the alphabet. There weren’t any A, B, A’s, B’s, and C’s. They were, all my grades were X’s, Y’s, and Z’s. And after a quarter like that and I saw those terrible grades, I wondered “What on earth?! What am I doing in engineering? I’m not adapted to this.” But I didn’t know what else to do. And a friend of mine from high school had invited me over to the architecture building (he was a sophomore in architecture by then) but I’d never been over there before, and as I was waiting in the lobby to see him, I looked around and saw all these great, large watercolor drawings on the walls.