DOCSLIB.ORG

Commissioned List of Indications 2021-2022

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Commissioned List of Indications 2021-2022 Appendix 1: Mid and South Essex CCGs Collaboration Commissioners list of indications that may be commissioned for excluded drugs and devices 2021/2022 v1 High cost drugs excluded from the 2021/2022 National Tariff are not commissioned by Mid and South Essex Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) unless the drugs and indications have approval through local processes. The table in Appendix 1 summarise the policy on the commissioning of drugs and devices. It is coded by a "traffic light" scheme as follows: Any drug and/or indication (licensed or unlicensed use) not listed In Appendix 1 is designated as NOT COMMISSIONED Not commissioned. Where provider Trusts prescribe this treatment the funding responsibility lies with the provider and not the commissioner. Approved for use in line with NICE Guidance or where NICE has been converted into a locally agreed protocol. Notification or individual or group prior approval required using proforma as per contract. Clinical evidence of outcomes may be requested by CCGs (in line with local contracts). Funding will not be authorised for patients who do not meet agreed criteria. Approved for use in line with locally agreed guidance only. Prior approval, notification proformas or electronic Blueteq® forms should be completed. Indications with other minimum dataset information must be provided on back up data to invoices. NHSE commissioning responsibility. CCGs should not consider funding requests for these drugs in these indications / group of patients. For drugs or indications where NHS England is the responsible commissioner the current version of the NHS England drug list should be refered to for the commissioning position, this is located at :- https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/spec- services/key-docs/ Please note that the enclosed information reflects the current commissioning arrangements. These arrangements are subject to change in year if commissioning responsibility for particular drugs or services change between Mid and South Essex CCGs and the NHS England and / or new local drug policies are introduced or new NICE guidance is published. The main reference sources used to produce this document were: 1. National Tariff payment system 2020 2021 Annex A: The National Tariff and national prices workbook, High cost drugs and devices available at https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/national‐tariff/ 2. East of England Priorities Advisory Commmittee (PAC) recommendations available at: http://www.prescqipp.info/ 3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guidance available at www.nice.org.uk. 4. UKMi Prescribing Outlook 2020 available from Specialist Pharmacy Services https://www.sps.nhs.uk/articles/prescribing‐outlook‐2020/ 5. UKMi New Drugs Online available from Specialist Pharmacy Services https://www.sps.nhs.uk/ 6. Indications for NHS England drugs list v15 published April 2020 available at https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/spec‐services/key‐docs Version 1 April 2021 Appendix 1: Mid and South Essex CCGs Collaboration Commissioners' list of indications that may be commissioned for excluded drugs and devices 2021/2022 High cost drugs excluded from the 2021-22 National Tariff are not commissioned by Mid and South Essex Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) unless the drugs and indications have approval through local processes. Please note that the enclosed information reflects the current commissioning arrangements. These arrangements are subject to change in year if commissioning responsibility for particular drugs or services change between Mid and South Essex CCGs and the NHS England and/or new local drug policies are introduced or new NICE guidance is published. Any drug and/or indication (licensed or unlicensed use) not listed In Appendix 1 is designated as NOT COMMISSIONED The table in Appendix 1 summarise the policy on the commissioning of drugs and devices. It is coded by a "traffic light" scheme as follows: Not commissioned. Where provider Trusts prescribe this treatment the funding responsibility lies with the provider and not the commissioner. Approved for use in line with NICE Guidance or where NICE has been converted into a locally agreed protocol or EoE CCG policy. Notification or individual or group prior approval required using proforma or electronic Blueteq® forms as per contract. Clinical evidence of outcomes may be requested by CCGs (in line with local contracts). Funding will not be authorised for patients who do not meet agreed criteria. Approved for use in line with locally agreed guidance only. Prior approval, notification proformas or electronic Blueteq® forms should be completed. Indications with other minimum dataset information must be provided on back up data to invoices. NHS England commissioning responsibility. CCGs should not consider funding requests for these drugs in these indications / group of patients. For drugs or indications where NHS England is the responsible commissioner the current version of the NHS England drug list should be refered to for the commissioning position, this is located at : https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/spec-services/key-docs/ Version 1 April 2021 Page 2 of 50 Appendix 1: Mid and South Essex CCGs Collaboration Commissioners' list of indications that may be commissioned for excluded drugs and devices 2021/2022 Drug name BNF Category Licensed Indication/ NICE Guidance Indications agreed Is this commissioned? Notes section Indication for funding across What is required for EoE funding approval? Abatacept 10.1.3 Cytokine Rheumatoid arthritis NICE TA195, In line with NICE Complete proforma CCG commission adults modulators after failure of anti- August 2010 TA195. (using agreed local only. GP prescribing NOT expected. NHS England is TNF systems) responsible commissioner for paediatric use. Abatacept 10.1.3 Cytokine Rheumatoid Arthritis NICE TA375 In line with NICE Complete proforma CCG commission adults modulators not previously treated January 2016. TA375. (using agreed local only. GP prescribing NOT expected. NHS England is with DMARDs or after (partial review of systems) responsible commissioner conventional TA375, NICE for paediatric use. NICE DMARDs only have ID2710. TA375 replaced NICE failed In development TA280 [GID-TA10586] Abatacept 10.1.3 Cytokine Polyarticular juvenile NICE TA373 In line with NICE Complete proforma CCG commision adults only. modulators idiopathic arthritis December 2015 TA373. (using agreed local GP prescribing NOT expected. NHS England is (2nd line only). systems) responsible commissioner Unlicensed use in for paediatric use. adults. Abatacept 10.1.3 Cytokine Active psoriatic NICE TA568 NOT NOT COMMISSIONED modulators arthritis after March 2019 COMMISSIONED DMARDs Terminated appraisal. Abrocitinib JAK inhibitor Moderate to severe No NICE NOT NOT COMMISSIONED UK availability 2021 atopic dermatitis, in guidance COMMISSIONED adults anticipated. Actoxumab Monoclonal Prevention of No NICE NOT NOT COMMISSIONED Not licensed yet antibodies. No BNF recurrence guidance COMMISSIONED category of Clostridium anticipated. difficile infection Version 1 April 2021 Page 3 of 50 Appendix 1: Mid and South Essex CCGs Collaboration Commissioners' list of indications that may be commissioned for excluded drugs and devices 2021/2022 Drug name BNF Category Licensed Indication/ NICE Guidance Indications agreed Is this commissioned? Notes section Indication for funding across What is required for EoE funding approval? Adalimumab or 13.5.3 Cytokine Psoriasis NICE TA146 In line with NICE Complete proforma CCG commission Adults biosimilar modulators June 2008 TA146. (using agreed local only. GP prescribing NOT expected. NHS England is systems) responsible commissioner for plaque psoriasis in children NICE TA 455, paediatric use (of adult TAs), uveitis (NICE TA 460) and Hidradenitis Suppurativa (NICE TA 392) and Bechet's syndrome. Adalimumab or 1.5.3 Cytokine Crohn's Disease NICE TA187 May In line with NICE Complete proforma CCG commission Adults biosimilar modulators 2010 TA187 (using agreed local only. GP prescribing NOT expected. NHS England is systems) responsible commissioner for plaque psoriasis in children NICE TA 455, paediatric use (of adult TAs), uveitis (NICE TA 460) and Hidradenitis Suppurativa (NICE TA 392) and Bechet's syndrome. Adalimumab or 10.1.3 Cytokine Psoriatic Arthritis NICE TA199, In line with NICE Complete proforma CCG commission Adults biosimilar modulators August 2010 TA199. (using agreed local only. GP prescribing NOT expected. NHS England is systems) responsible commissioner for plaque psoriasis in children NICE TA 455, paediatric use (of adult TAs), uveitis (NICE TA 460) and Hidradenitis Suppurativa (NICE TA 392) and Bechet's syndrome. Version 1 April 2021 Page 4 of 50 Appendix 1: Mid and South Essex CCGs Collaboration Commissioners' list of indications that may be commissioned for excluded drugs and devices 2021/2022 Drug name BNF Category Licensed Indication/ NICE Guidance Indications agreed Is this commissioned? Notes section Indication for funding across What is required for EoE funding approval? Adalimumab or 1.5.3 Cytokine Moderate to severe NICE TA329 In line with NICE Complete proforma CCG commission Adults biosimilar modulators active ulcerative February 2015 criteria TA329 (using agreed local only. GP prescribing NOT expected. NHS England is colitis after the failure systems) responsible commissioner of conventional for plaque psoriasis in therapy children NICE TA 455, paediatric use (of adult TAs), uveitis (NICE TA 460) and Hidradenitis Suppurativa (NICE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WO 2018/223101 Al 06 December 2018 (06.12.2018) W !P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2018/223101 Al 06 December 2018 (06.12.2018) W !P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: (71) Applicant: JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC. [US/US]; 400 A 61K 35/1 7 (20 15.0 1) A 61P 35/00 (2006 .0 1) Dexter Ave. N., Suite 1200, Seattle, WA 98109 (US). (21) International Application Number: (72) Inventor: ALBERTSON, Tina; 400 Dexter Ave. N., Suite PCT/US2018/035755 1200, Seattle, WA 98109 (US). (22) International Filing Date: (74) Agent: AHN, Sejin et al; Morrison & Foerster LLP, 1253 1 0 1 June 2018 (01 .06.2018) High Bluff Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92130-2040 (US). (25) Filing Language: English (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, (30) Priority Data: AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, 62/5 14,774 02 June 2017 (02.06.2017) US CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, 62/5 15,530 05 June 2017 (05.06.2017) US DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, 62/521,366 16 June 2017 (16.06.2017) u s HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, 62/527,000 29 June 2017 (29.06.2017) u s KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, 62/549,938 24 August 2017 (24.08.2017) u s MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, 62/580,425 0 1 November 2017 (01 .11.2017) u s OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, 62/593,871 0 1 December 2017 (01 .12.2017) u s SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 62/596,764 08 December 2017 (08.12.2017) u s TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I/II Study Evaluating the Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Temsirolimus and Bevacizumab in Patients with Chemotherapy Refra
    Investigational New Drugs (2019) 37:331–337 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-018-0687-5 PHASE II STUDIES Phase I/II study evaluating the safety and clinical efficacy of temsirolimus and bevacizumab in patients with chemotherapy refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer Pedro C. Barata1 & Matthew Cooney2 & Prateek Mendiratta 2 & Ruby Gupta3 & Robert Dreicer4 & Jorge A. Garcia3 Received: 25 September 2018 /Accepted: 16 October 2018 /Published online: 7 November 2018 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Summary Background Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway and angiogenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have been shown to play important roles in prostate cancer progression. Preclinical data in prostate cancer has suggested the potential additive effect dual inhibition of VEGF and mTOR pathways. In this phase I/II trial we assessed the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with temsirolimus for the treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods In the phase I portion, eligible patients received temsirolimus (20 mg or 25 mg IV weekly) in combination with a fixed dose of IV bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint for the phase II portion was objective response measured by either PSA or RECIST criteria. Exploratory endpoints included changes in circulating tumor cells (CTC) and their correlation with PSA response to treatment. Results Twenty-one patients, median age 64 (53–82), with pre- treatment PSA of 205.3 (11.1–1801.0), previously treated with a median of 2 (0–5) lines of therapy for mCRPC received the combination of temsirolimus weekly at 20 mg (n =4)or25mg(n = 17) with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n =21).
    [Show full text]
  • Therapeutic Inhibition of VEGF Signaling and Associated Nephrotoxicities
    REVIEW www.jasn.org Therapeutic Inhibition of VEGF Signaling and Associated Nephrotoxicities Chelsea C. Estrada,1 Alejandro Maldonado,1 and Sandeep K. Mallipattu1,2 1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York; and 2Renal Section, Northport Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Northport, New York ABSTRACT Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA)/vascular endothelial with hypertension and proteinuria. Re- growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) signaling is a common therapeutic strategy in ports describe histologic changes in the oncology, with new drugs continuously in development. In this review, we consider kidney primarily as glomerular endothe- the experimental and clinical evidence behind the diverse nephrotoxicities associ- lial injury with thrombotic microangiop- ated with the inhibition of this pathway. We also review the renal effects of VEGF athy (TMA).8 Nephrotic syndrome has inhibition’s mediation of key downstream signaling pathways, specifically MAPK/ also been observed,9 with the clinical ERK1/2, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and mammalian target of rapamycin manifestations varying according to (mTOR). Direct VEGFA inhibition via antibody binding or VEGF trap (a soluble decoy mechanism and direct target of VEGF receptor) is associated with renal-specific thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Re- inhibition. ports also indicate that tyrosine kinase inhibition of the VEGF receptors is prefer- Current VEGF inhibitors can be clas- entially associated with glomerulopathies such as minimal change disease and FSGS. sifiedbytheirtargetofactioninthe Inhibition of the downstream pathway RAF/MAPK/ERK has largely been associated VEGFA-VEGFR2 pathway: drugs that with tubulointerstitial injury. Inhibition of mTOR is most commonly associated with bind to VEGFA, sequester VEGFA, in- albuminuria and podocyte injury, but has also been linked to renal-specificTMA.In hibit receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), all, we review the experimentally validated mechanisms by which VEGFA-VEGFR2 or inhibit downstream pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • JAK-Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Focus on the Present and an Outlook on the Future
    biomolecules Review JAK-Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Focus on the Present and an Outlook on the Future 1, 2, , 3 1,4 Jacopo Angelini y , Rossella Talotta * y , Rossana Roncato , Giulia Fornasier , Giorgia Barbiero 1, Lisa Dal Cin 1, Serena Brancati 1 and Francesco Scaglione 5 1 Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; [email protected] (J.A.); [email protected] (G.F.); [email protected] (G.B.); [email protected] (L.D.C.); [email protected] (S.B.) 2 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, AOU “Gaetano Martino”, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy 3 Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Pordenone, 33081 Aviano, Italy; [email protected] 4 Pharmacy Unit, IRCCS-Burlo Garofolo di Trieste, 34137 Trieste, Italy 5 Head of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Department of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, Director of Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20162 Milan, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-090-2111; Fax: +39-090-293-5162 Co-first authors. y Received: 16 May 2020; Accepted: 1 July 2020; Published: 5 July 2020 Abstract: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) belong to a new class of oral targeted disease-modifying drugs which have recently revolutionized the therapeutic panorama of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other immune-mediated diseases, placing alongside or even replacing conventional and biological drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Anticoagulants
    4/26/2018 Disclosure • Kelsey Gander, PharmD, BCACP Direct Oral Anticoagulants: – Declares no financial relationships pertinent to this session When to Use and How to Choose – Declares off-label use of medication will not be discussed during this presentation. Kelsey Gander, PharmD, BCACP Minnesota Academy of Physician Assistants Conference May 11th, 2018 Abbreviations Objectives • DOAC= direct oral anticoagulant 1) Compare and contrast the efficacy and safety • VTE= venous thromboembolism • DVT= deep vein thrombosis of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to • PE= pulmonary embolism warfarin • A-fib, AF= atrial fibrillation 2) Identify which anticoagulant would be most • ESRD= end stage renal disease appropriate for a given patient • ACC= American College of Cardiology • AHA= American Heart Association 3) Recognize when it would not be appropriate • HRS= Heart Rhythm Society to use a DOAC • BID= twice daily Appropriate Abbreviations Patient Case JJ is a 66 y/o male who was hospitalized for pulmonary • NOAC embolism and initiated on anticoagulant therapy one week – Novel Oral Anticoagulant ago. – Chief complaint: – Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulant • Presents to clinic today for INR check, post-hospital discharge follow- up • TSOAC – Past medical history: • Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, osteoarthritis, erectile dysfunction, – Target Specific Oral Anticoagulant BPH, type 2 diabetes, peripheral artery disease – Home medications • DOAC • Acetaminophen 650mg po every 6 hours PRN – Direct Oral Anticoagulant • Diazepam 5mg po at bedtime PRN anxiety
    [Show full text]
  • Study Protocol
    (rJ GI LEAi) Galapagos CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL Study Title: A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in the Treatment of Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease (SBCD) Sponsor: Gilead Sciences, Inc. 333 Lakeside Drive Foster City, CA 94404, USA IND Number: 129646 EudraCT Number: 2016-003179-23 Clinical Trials.gov NCT03046056 Identifier: Indication: Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease Protocol ID: GS-US-419-4015 Contact Information: The medical monitor name and contact information will be provided on the Key Study Team Contact List. Protocol Original: 12 September 2016 Version/Date: Amendment 1: 16 December 2016 Amendment 2: 26 June 2017 Amendment 3: 04 February 2020 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT The information contained in this document, particularly unpublished data, is the property or under control of Gilead Sciences, Inc., and is provided to you in confidence as an investigator, potential investigator, or consultant, for review by you, your staff, and an applicable Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee. The information is only to be used by you in connection with authorized clinical studies of the investigational drug described in the protocol. You will not disclose any of the information to others without written authorization from Gilead Sciences, Inc., except to the extent necessary to obtain informed consent from those persons to whom the drug may be administered. Filgotinib Protocol GS-US-419-4015 Final Gilead Sciences, lnc. Amendment3 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations from York and Scarborough Medicines
    Recommendations from York and Scarborough Medicines Commissioning Committee March 2021 Drug name Indication Recommendation, rationale and place in RAG status Potential full year cost impact therapy CCG commissioned Technology Appraisals 1. TA672: Brolucizumab for Brolucizumab is recommended as an option for treating wet Listed as RED Discussed and approved at Feb 2021 MCC meeting. treating wet age-related age-related macular degeneration in adults, only if, in the eye drug macular degeneration to be treated: the best-corrected visual acuity is between 6/12 and Commissioning: CCG, 6/96 tariff excluded there is no permanent structural damage to the central fovea the lesion size is less than or equal to 12 disc areas in greatest linear dimension and there is recent presumed disease progression (for example, blood vessel growth, as shown by fluorescein angiography, or recent visual acuity changes). It is recommended only if the company provides brolucizumab according to the commercial arrangement. If patients and their clinicians consider brolucizumab to be one of a range of suitable treatments, including aflibercept and ranibizumab, choose the least expensive (taking into account administration costs and commercial arrangements). Only continue brolucizumab in people who maintain an adequate response to therapy. Criteria for stopping should include persistent deterioration in visual acuity and identification of anatomical changes in the retina that indicate inadequate response to therapy. 2. TA675: Vernakalant for NICE is unable to make a recommendation about the Not listed No cost impact to CCGs as appraisal terminated by the rapid conversion of use in the NHS of vernakalant for the rapid conversion NICE and insufficient evidence to approve use.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPARISON of the WHO ATC CLASSIFICATION & Ephmra/Intellus Worldwide ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION
    COMPARISON OF THE WHO ATC CLASSIFICATION & EphMRA/Intellus Worldwide ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION: VERSION June 2019 2 Comparison of the WHO ATC Classification and EphMRA / Intellus Worldwide Anatomical Classification The following booklet is designed to improve the understanding of the two classification systems. The development of the two systems had previously taken place separately. EphMRA and WHO are now working together to ensure that there is a convergence of the 2 systems rather than a divergence. In order to better understand the two classification systems, we should pay attention to the way in which substances/products are classified. WHO mainly classifies substances according to the therapeutic or pharmaceutical aspects and in one class only (particular formulations or strengths can be given separate codes, e.g. clonidine in C02A as antihypertensive agent, N02C as anti-migraine product and S01E as ophthalmic product). EphMRA classifies products, mainly according to their indications and use. Therefore, it is possible to find the same compound in several classes, depending on the product, e.g., NAPROXEN tablets can be classified in M1A (antirheumatic), N2B (analgesic) and G2C if indicated for gynaecological conditions only. The purposes of classification are also different: The main purpose of the WHO classification is for international drug utilisation research and for adverse drug reaction monitoring. This classification is recommended by the WHO for use in international drug utilisation research. The EphMRA/Intellus Worldwide classification has a primary objective to satisfy the marketing needs of the pharmaceutical companies. Therefore, a direct comparison is sometimes difficult due to the different nature and purpose of the two systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Value Assessment and Market Access of Innovative Biologics in China
    Value assessment and market access of innovative biologics in China Jinxi Ding Professor of China Pharmaceutical University 2018.9.11 Tokyo 1 Background 2 Value Assessment 3 Reimbursement Management 2 1 I. Innovative Biologics Industry Flourishes CDE has established Priority Review and Conditional Approval to speed up the market launching of clinically urgent and effective drugs The number of innovative biologics approved by CDE is increasing, and exceeded 20 in 2017 Opdivo、Keytruda • Blockbuster PD-1 drugs nivolumab Table. 2013-2017 The Number of Innovative Biologics Approved by CDE and pembrolizumab both were approved through Priority Review. • Nivolumab marketing approval takes 226 days • Pembrolizumab marketing approval takes 164 days 3 II. The Importance of Innovative Biologics is Prominent 10 of 15 are Innovative Table. Top 15 best-Severeselling drugs disease of 2017 such as cancer Biologics Generic Name Sales Ranking Manufacturer Indications Classification （Brand Name） （10^9$） 1 adalimumab（Humira®） AbbVie Rheumatoid arthritis Biologics 184.27 Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 2 ® Roche、Biogen Biologics 92.38 rituximab（ Mabthera ） CML, etc. 3 Lenalidomide（Revlimid®） CELG Multiple myeloma Chemical 81.87 4 etanercept（Enbrel®） Amgen、Pfizer Rheumatoid arthritis Biologics 78.85 5 trastuzumab（ Herceptin®） Roche HER2 breast cancer Biologics 74.41 Deep vein thrombosis and 6 apixaban（Eliquis®） Pfizer、BMS Chemical 73.95 pulmonary embolism 7 infliximab（Remicade®） Johnson、Merk Crohn's disease Biologics 71.52 8 bevacizumab（Avastin®） Roche Metastatic rectal cancer Biologics 70.96 9 rivaroxaban（Xarelto®） Bayer、Johnson Venous thrombosis Chemical 65.89 Macular degeneration, 10 aflibercept（Eylea®） REGN、Bayer Biologics 60.34 macular edema, etc. 11 insulin glargine（Lantus®） Sanofi Diabetes Chemical 57.32 12 Prevnar13® Pfizer Pneumonia vaccine Biologics 56.01 13 pregabalin（Lyrica®） Pfizer Neuropathic pain Chemical 50.65 14 nivolumab （Opdivo®） BMS Melanoma, NSCL Biologics 49.48 chemotherapy-induced 15 pegfilgrastim（Neulasta®） Amgen Biologics 45.34 neutropenia, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Promising Therapeutic Targets for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
    REVIEW published: 09 July 2021 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.686155 Promising Therapeutic Targets for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis † † Jie Huang 1 , Xuekun Fu 1 , Xinxin Chen 1, Zheng Li 1, Yuhong Huang 1 and Chao Liang 1,2* 1 Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China, 2 Institute of Integrated Bioinfomedicine and Translational Science (IBTS), School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic poly-articular chronic autoimmune joint disease that mainly damages the hands and feet, which affects 0.5% to 1.0% of the population worldwide. With the sustained development of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), significant success has been achieved for preventing and relieving disease activity in RA patients. Unfortunately, some patients still show limited response to DMARDs, which puts forward new requirements for special targets and novel therapies. Understanding the pathogenetic roles of the various molecules in RA could facilitate discovery of potential therapeutic targets and approaches. In this review, both Edited by: existing and emerging targets, including the proteins, small molecular metabolites, and Trine N. Jorgensen, epigenetic regulators related to RA, are discussed, with a focus on the mechanisms that Case Western Reserve University, result in inflammation and the development of new drugs for blocking the various United States modulators in RA. Reviewed by: Åsa Andersson, Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, targets, proteins, small molecular metabolites, epigenetic regulators Halmstad University, Sweden Abdurrahman Tufan, Gazi University, Turkey *Correspondence: INTRODUCTION Chao Liang [email protected] Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is classified as a systemic poly-articular chronic autoimmune joint † disease that primarily affects hands and feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Treat-And-Extend Therapy Using Aflibercept for Neovascular Age
    Treat-and-Extend Therapy Using Aflibercept for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Prospective Clinical Trial FRANCIS CHAR DECROOS, DAVID REED, MURTAZA K. ADAM, DAVID SALZ, OMESH P. GUPTA, ALLEN C. HO, AND CARL D. REGILLO PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and durability of HOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION (CNV) CAUSES aflibercept used in a treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen the vast majority of severe visual loss from for neovascular age-related macular degeneration neovascular age-related macular degeneration C 1 (NVAMD). (NVAMD). Intravitreal vascular endothelial growth fac- DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, open label, noncom- tor (VEGF) blockade has revolutionized the treatment of parative, interventional study. NVAMD. Ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, Inc) and METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 patients with treatment- bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, Inc) are anti-VEGF naı¨ve NVAMD were managed with a TAE regimen of agents that have been extensively studied.2–7 intravitreal aflibercept. The main endpoints were the Ranibizumab is currently approved by the U.S. Food and change in mean and median best-corrected visual acuity Drug Administration for treatment of NVAMD, while from baseline at years 1 and 2. Other endpoints included bevacizumab is used in an off-label fashion. mean number of annual injections and treatment More recently, the fully human, soluble recombinant intervals. VEGF receptor decoy aflibercept (Eylea; Regeneron Phar- RESULTS: Thirty-five (87.5%) and 31 patients maceuticals, Inc) was approved for treatment of NVAMD. (77.5%) completed year 1 and year 2, respectively. Aflibercept is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of The mean letter gain was 7.2 (P < .001) and 2.4 the extracellular domain of the human VEGF receptors 1 (P [ .269) letters at 1 and 2 years, respectively, (Ig2 domain) and 2 (Ig3 domain) fused to the Fc domain from a mean baseline of 58.9 letters (20/63 Snellen of human IgG1.
    [Show full text]
  • 76. Which of the Following Is Incorrect Based on the 2018 ASRA Checklist for Managing Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity?
    76. Which of the following is incorrect based on the 2018 ASRA Checklist for managing Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity? A. The upper limit of lipid emulsion dosing is 12mL/kg B. Monitoring should be at least 4-6 hours after a cardiovascular event or at least 2 hours after a limited CNS event C. 20% lipid emulsion should be used as the initial drug at the first sign of a serious LAST Event D. Epinephrine doses of > 1mcg/kg are recommended 77. Which of the following statements is NOT true with regard to the management of new oral anticoagulants? A. Rivaroxaban (Xarelto) and Apixaban (Eliquis) should be held for at least 72 hours prior to neuraxial block B. Dabigatran (Pradaxa) should be held for 24 to 48 hours prior to neuraxial block in a patient with a compromised GFR C. Dabigatran can be reversed by the monoclonal antibody idarucizumab D. Factor Xa inhibitors, Rivaroxaban and Apixaban, can be effectivelY reversed with andexanet alfa 78. Which answer the correct spread of local anesthetic for an Erector Spinae Plane Block performed at the T5 level? A. Spread between the erector spinae muscle and rhomboid muscle B. Spread lateral to the transverse process, superficial to the erector spinae muscle C. Spread deep to the erector spinae muscle at the transverse process D. Spread deep to the costotransverse ligament, pushing the pleura ventrallY 79. When assessing the lungs with ultrasound, which of the following signs are suggestive a pneumothorax: A. Absence of lung sliding B. Presence of “comet tails” C. Absence of a “lung point” D.
    [Show full text]