Metric and Morphological Comparison Between the Arago (France) and Atapuerca-Sima De Los Huesos (Spain) Dental Samples, and the Origin of Neanderthals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Metric and Morphological Comparison Between the Arago (France) and Atapuerca-Sima De Los Huesos (Spain) Dental Samples, and the Origin of Neanderthals Quaternary Science Reviews xxx (2018) 1e17 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Metric and morphological comparison between the Arago (France) and Atapuerca-Sima de los Huesos (Spain) dental samples, and the origin of Neanderthals * Jose María Bermúdez de Castro a, b, , María Martinon-Torres a, b, Marina Martínez de Pinillos a, Cecilia García-Campos a, Mario Modesto-Mata a, c, Laura Martín-Frances d, Juan Luis Arsuaga e a Centro Nacional de Investigacion sobre la Evolucion Humana, CENIEH, Avenida de la Sierra de Atapuerca 3, 09002, Burgos, Spain b Department of Anthropology, University College London, 14 Taviton Street, London, WC1H 0BW, UK c Equipo Primeros Pobladores de Extremadura (EPPEX), Casa de la Cultura Rodríguez Moniino,~ Av. Cervantes s/n, Caceres 10003, Spain d Universite de Bordeaux, CNRS, MCC, PACEA, UMR 5199 F_33615, Pessac Cedex, France e Centro Mixto UCM-ISCIII de Evolucion y Comportamiento Humanos, Madrid, Spain article info abstract Article history: The variability observed in the growing Middle Pleistocene hominin fossil record of Europe continues to Received 20 February 2018 trigger much debate on taxonomic issues and the biological processes that gave rise to Neanderthals. Received in revised form Here we present a metric and morphological comparative study of the dental samples recovered from 3 April 2018 the sites of Arago (southeast France) and Sima de los Huesos (SH) in the Sierra de Atapuerca (northern Accepted 3 April 2018 Spain). These sites are key to providing answers to these questions since they have yielded the largest Available online xxx hominin samples so far recovered for this time period. Despite the geographical proximity of the two sites and the contemporaneity of their hominin assemblages, we have observed remarkable metric and Keywords: Human evolution morphological differences between the teeth at Arago and SH. Whereas the SH teeth present an almost Europe morphological identity with European Neanderthals, the Arago teeth exhibit a combination of plesio- Pleistocene morphic as well as some Neanderthal-derived features. In addition, the Arago crown dimensions are Neanderthals remarkably larger than those from SH, the differences being statistically significant for most variables. Teeth We hypothesize that during the Middle Pleistocene the European continent was settled at different points in time by hominin groups coming from Southwest Asia, probably from a common mother population evolving in this latter region. These first settlers can be identified by their more plesiomor- phic morphology, whereas the most recent settlers are closer in appearance to Neanderthals. In addition, genetic processes such as isolation, genetic drift, directional adaptation or hybridization would have given rise to the puzzle we observe in the current fossil record. © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 1. Introduction palaeogenetics. Therefore, presenting an exhaustive history of research on human evolution in Europe during the Pleistocene is Over the years, the interpretation of the European Pleistocene beyond the scope of this work. It is nonetheless interesting, and fossil record has increasingly captured the attention of many spe- relevant to our present discussion to refer back to the main hy- cialists. This interpretation has undergone substantial changes as potheses that were proposed during the second half of the twen- the number of human fossils has increased, the dating of many sites tieth century, and during this century, on the origins of the has improved, and new lines of research have been opened, such as Neanderthals. 1.1. Theories about the settlement of Europe during the Middle * Corresponding author. Centro Nacional de Investigacion sobre la Evolucion Pleistocene: an overview Humana, CENIEH, Avenida de la Sierra de Atapuerca 3, 09002, Burgos, Spain. E-mail address: [email protected] (J.M. Bermúdez de Castro). The so-called presapiens theory, proposed by Vallois (1954), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.04.003 0277-3791/© 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Please cite this article in press as: Bermúdez de Castro, J.M., et al., Metric and morphological comparison between the Arago (France) and Atapuerca-Sima de los Huesos (Spain) dental samples, and the origin of Neanderthals, Quaternary Science Reviews (2018), https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.04.003 2 J.M. Bermúdez de Castro et al. / Quaternary Science Reviews xxx (2018) 1e17 attempted to show a primary bifurcation into two distinct lines: H. erectus species led Stringer (1983, 1985) to postulate that spec- “Neanderthal” and “sapiens”. This hypothesis was criticized by imens like those from Mauer, Vertesz oll€ os,€ Bilzingsleben, Arago, Howell (1960), who did not find significant differences between and Petralona, together with Broken Hill, Bodo, and Dali would Steinheim and Swanscombe, two key specimens in the presapiens represent the stem species (H. heidelbergensis) for Neanderthals theory. Moreover, Howell (1960) was very clear in his separation of and modern humans. This hypothesis was further developed by the Pleistocene populations found in the European fossil record and other colleagues (e.g. Rightmire, 1996; Rightmire, 1998; Tattersall, those found in eastern Asia and northern Africa, which today have 1996). Arsuaga et al. (1997a) also included the SH hominins been attributed by many to H. erectus. Howell (1960) divided within this species. However, these last authors believe that temporally the European hominin fossil record in two phases: “(1) H. heidelbergensis ought to be considered as an exclusive European the pre- Great Interglacial range (early Middle Pleistocene) and (2) chronospecies of the Neanderthal lineage. Later Arsuaga et al. the Great Interglacial and subsequent early phase of the Penulti- (2014) left the SH hominins out of the H. heidelbergesis species, mate Glacial range (later Middle Pleistocene)”. After his detailed particularly because of the lack of cranial features like those found study of the limited fossil record of that time, Howell (1960, p. 223) in other European Middle Pleistocene fossils, such as Ceprano (see conclude that “ The evidence would suggest that two distinctive below) and Arago, and the clear differences between the Mauer and hominid lineages were differentiated within the Middle Pleisto- the SH mandibular samples. The high degree of morphological di- cene, one represented by eastern Asian and northwest African versity in the European Middle Pleistocene fossil record had begun populations, and the other by European populations”. to suggest a more complex view, especially after the discovery of Aguirre et al. (1976) and Aguirre and de Lumley (1977) studied the Ceprano calvaria (Ascenzi et al., 1996), the Mala Balanica the fossil hominins recovered from the Atapuerca-SH site. These mandible (Roksandic et al., 2011), and the Aroeira 3 cranium (Daura authors included these fossils alongside those of Arago and Mauer et al., 2017). in the so-called ‘Anteneanderthal population’. This term, which has The Ceprano calvaria was first included in H. erectus, given its dominated the scientific literature for decades, alludes to the clear primitive morphology and its presumed early Pleistocene chro- phylogenetic relationship between the human populations of the nology (Ascenzi et al., 1996). However, new dating points provided Middle Pleistocene and the Neanderthals of the Late Pleistocene. an age range between 0.43 and 0.38 million years ago (Ma) (Manzi Aguirre and de Lumley (1977) were also not comfortable with the et al, 2010). Given this age and the observation that the morphology idea of including any other Pleistocene remains from Europe in the of the specimen has no equivalent in Europe, its taxonomic status H. erectus taxon which, according to these authors, “should be remains controversial. This specimen has been also included in restricted to the fossils from Java”. Nevertheless, the idea that H. cepranensis (Mallegni et al., 2003), whereas new analyses led anteneaderthals (or at least some of them) represent a particular Mounier et al. (2011) and Manzi (2016) to initially include the lineage of H. erectus has persisted for decades (e.g. Jelinek, 1986; De Ceprano calvaria in the H. heidelbergensis species. The Mala Balanica Lumley, 2015 , but see Howell, 1986). mandibular fragment lacks Neanderthal features, and has been Although Thoma (1966) revived the presapiens hypothesis, the described as Homo sp (Roksandic et al., 2011). This specimen has idea that in Europe there was a great biodiversity of human pop- been dated to the Middle Pleistocene (Rink et al., 2013). The Aroeira ulations, and all of them were related to Neanderthals, appears 3 cranium shows an interesting combination of cranial features clearly in the review carried out by Howells (1980). In the same present in the Atapuerca-SH, Arago, and Ceprano specimens, thus sense, Brauer€ (1984) presented evidence against the hypothesis of confirming the complexity that lies behind the interpretation of the the origin of H. sapiens in Europe. This author proposed the “Afro- European Middle Pleistocene fossil record (Daura et al., 2017). European sapiens hypothesis” and considered that all European Finally, the analysis of the impressive cranial sample recovered Middle Pleistocene specimens represent a very variable Ante- from the SH hominins (Arsuaga et al., 2014) confirms the remark- neanderthal population. According to this hypothesis,
Recommended publications
  • An Early Modern Human from the Pes¸Tera Cu Oase, Romania
    An early modern human from the Pes¸tera cu Oase, Romania Erik Trinkaus*†, Oana Moldovan‡,S¸ tefan Milota§, Adrian Bıˆlga˘r¶, Laurent¸iu Sarcina§, Sheela Athreyaʈ, Shara E. Bailey**, Ricardo Rodrigo††, Gherase Mircea§, Thomas Higham‡‡, Christopher Bronk Ramsey‡‡, and Johannes van der Plicht§§ *Department of Anthropology, Campus Box 1114, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130; ‡Institutul de Speologie ‘‘Emil Racovit¸a˘ ,’’ Clinicilor 5, P.O. Box 58, 3400 Cluj, Romania; §Pro Acva Grup, Strada˘Surduc 1, 1900 Timis¸oara, Romania; ¶Strada˘Decebal 1, 1500 Drobeta Turnu Severin, Romania; ʈDepartment of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843; **Department of Anthropology, George Washington University, 2110 G Street, Washington, DC 20052; ††Centro Nacional da Arqueologia Na´utica e Subaqua´tica, Instituto Portugueˆs de Arqueologia, Avenida da India 136, 1300 Lisboa, Portugal; ‡‡Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, United Kingdom; and §§Centrum voor Isotopen Onderzoek, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands Contributed by Erik Trinkaus, August 8, 2003 The 2002 discovery of a robust modern human mandible in the Pes¸tera cu Oase, southwestern Romania, provides evidence of early modern humans in the lower Danubian Corridor. Directly accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon (14C)-dated to 34,000– 36,000 14C years B.P., the Oase 1 mandible is the oldest definite early modern human specimen in Europe and provides perspec- tives on the emergence and evolution of early modern humans in the northwestern Old World. The moderately long Oase 1 mandi- ble exhibits a prominent tuber symphyseos and overall proportions that place it close to earlier Upper Paleolithic European specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cochlea of the Aroeira 3 Middle Pleistocene Cranium-A Comparative
    Journal of Human Evolution 148 (2020) 102887 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Human Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol Short Communications The cochlea of the Aroeira 3 Middle Pleistocene craniumda comparative study * Mercedes Conde-Valverde a, , Ignacio Martínez a, Rolf Quam a, b, c, d, Juan-Luis Arsuaga a, c, e, Joan Daura f, g, Montserrat Sanz f, g,Joao~ Zilhao~ g, h, i a Catedra de Bioacústica Evolutiva y Paleoantropología (HM Hospitales e Universidad de Alcala), Area de Antropología Física, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad de Alcala, 28871 Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain b Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University (SUNY) Binghamton, NY, 13902-6000, USA c Centro Mixto (UCM-ISCIII) de Evolucion y Comportamiento Humanos, Av. Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain d Division of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West-79th St., New York, NY, 10024, USA e Departamento de Geodinamica, Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias Geologicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain f Grup de Recerca del Quaternari (GRQ)-SERP, Departament d'Historia i Arqueologia, C/ Montalegre 6-8, 08001 Barcelona, Spain g UNIARQ-Centro de Arqueologia da Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidades, 1600-214, Lisbon, Portugal h Department d’Historia i Arqueologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08007, Barcelona, Spain i Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Passeig Lluís
    [Show full text]
  • Do Nuclear DNA and Dental Nonmetric Data Produce Similar Reconstructions of Regional Population History? an Example from Modern Coastal Kenya
    American Journal of Physical Anthropology View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LJMU Research Online Do nuclear DNA and dental nonmetric data produce similar reconstructions of regional population history? An example from modern coastal Kenya Journal: American Journal of Physical Anthropology Manuscript ID: AJPA-2014-00343.R1 Wiley - Manuscript type: Research Article Date Submitted by the Author: 12-Dec-2014 Complete List oF Authors: Hubbard, Amelia; Wright State University, Anthropology and Sociology Guatelli-Steinberg, Debbie; The Ohio State University, Anthropology; Irish, Joel; Liverpool John Moores University, Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology nuclear microsatellite, dental morphology, coastal Kenya, East AFrica, Key Words: biological distance SubField: Please select your Bioarchaeology [including Forensics], Genetics [primate and human] first choice in the first field.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 1 of 35 American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1 2 3 4 5 Do nuclear DNA and dental nonmetric data produce similar reconstructions of regional 6 population history? An example from modern coastal Kenya 7 8 Amelia R. Hubbard1, Debbie Guatelli-Steinberg2, Joel D. Irish3 9 10 1Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA 11 2 12 Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA 3 13 Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, Liverpool John Moores 14 University, Liverpool, UK 15 16 INSTITUTION: Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA 45435 17 18 19 TEXT: 28 pages 20 21 FIGURES: 2 22 23 24 TABLES: 4 25 26 ABBREVIATED TITLE: Biological distance among regional populations 27 28 KEY WORDS: nuclear microsatellites, dental morphology, coastal East Africa 29 30 31 CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: 32 33 Amelia R.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology
    CALIFOR!:HA STATE UNIVERSI'fY, NO:R'l'HRIDGE 'l'HE EVOLUTIONARY SCHENES 0!.'' NEANDER.THAL A thesis su~nitted in partial satisfaction of tl:e requirements for the degree of Naste.r of A.rts Anthropology by Sharon Stacey Klein The Thesis of Sharon Stacey Klein is approved: Dr·,~ Nike West. - Dr. Bruce Gelvin, Chair California s·tate University, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ·There are many people I would like to thank. Firs·t, the members of my corr.mi ttee who gave me their guidance and suggestions. Second, rny family and friends who supported me through this endea7cr and listened to my constant complaining. Third, the people in my office who allowed me to use my time to complete ·this project. Specifically, I appreciate the proof-reading done by my mother and the French translations done by Mary Riedel. ii.i TABLE OF' CONTENTS PAGE PRELIMINA:H.Y MATEIUALS : Al")stra-:-:t vi CHAP'I'ERS: I. Introduction 1 II. Methodology and Materials 4 III. Classification of Neanderthals 11 Species versus Subspecies Definitions of Neanderthals 16 V. The Pre-sapiens Hypothesis .i9 VI. The Unilinear Hypothesis 26 Horphological Evidence Transi tiona.l Sp.. ::;:cimens T'ool Complexes VII. The Pre-Neanderthal Hypothesis 58 Morphological Evidence Spectrum Hypothesis "Classic'1 Neanderthal's Adaptations Transitional Evidence Tool Complexes VIII. Sumnary and Conclusion 90 Heferences Cited 100 1. G~<ological and A.rchaeoloqical 5 Subdivisions of the P1eistoce!1e 2. The Polyphyletic Hypothesis 17 3. The Pre-sapiens Hypothesis 20 4. The UnilinPar Hypothesis 27 iv FIGUHES: P.Z\GE 5. Size Comparisons of Neanderthal 34 and Australian Aborigine Teeth 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Volume 32, Issue 01, 2019 ISSN 1096-9411 Dental Anthropology A Publication of the Dental Anthropology Association Dental Anthropology 2019 │ Volume 32 │ Issue 01 2 Dental Anthropology Volume 32, Issue 01, 2019 Dental Anthropology is the Official Publication of the Dental Anthropology Association. Editors: Marin A. Pilloud and G. Richard Scott Editor Emeritus: Christopher W. Schmidt Editorial Board (2016-2019) Debbie Guatelli-Steinberg Grant Townsend Simon Hillson Chris Stojanowski Leslea Hlusko Cathy M. Willermet Yuji Mizoguchi Officers of the Dental Anthropology Association Heather J.H. Edgar (University of New Mexico) President (2016-2019) Daniel Antoine (British Museum) President-Elect (2016-2019) Amelia Hubbard (Wright State University) Secretary-Treasurer (2017-2020) Katie Zejdlik (Western Carolina University) Executive Board Member (2018-2021) Scott Burnett (Eckerd College) Past President (2012-2016) Contact for Manuscripts Dr. Marin A. Pilloud Dr. G. Richard Scott Department of Anthropology University of Nevada, Reno E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] Website: journal.dentalanthropology.org Address for Book Reviews Dr. Greg C. Nelson Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon Condon Hall, Eugene, Oregon 97403 U.S.A. E-mail address: [email protected] Published at University of Nevada, Reno Reno, Nevada 89557 The University of Nevada, Reno is an EEO/AA/Title IX/Section 504/ADA employer Editorial Assistant Rebecca L. George Production Assistant Daniel E. Ehrlich Dental Anthropology 2019 │ Volume 32 │ Issue 01 3 Case Study: Expression of Two Near Absent Dental Traits, Lingual Cuspule and Paraconid, on One Archaic Period Modern Human from the Ohio Valley Erin C. Blankenship-Sefczek* The Ohio State University, USA Keywords: Dental variation, dental evolution, rare trait ABSTRACT Dental anomalies in modern humans are used to discuss biological variation and evolutionary changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Erik Trinkaus
    9/2014 Curriculum Vitae Erik Trinkaus Education and Degrees 1970-1975 University of Pennsylvania Ph.D 1975 Dissertation: A Functional Analysis of the Neandertal Foot M.A. 1973 Thesis: A Review of the Reconstructions and Evolutionary Significance of the Fontéchevade Fossils 1966-1970 University of Wisconsin B.A. 1970 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Primary Academic Appointments Current 2002- Mary Tileston Hemenway Professor of Arts & Sciences, Department of Anthropolo- gy, Washington University Previous 1997-2002 Professor: Department of Anthropology, Washington University 1996-1997 Regents’ Professor of Anthropology, University of New Mexico 1983-1996 Assistant Professor to Professor: Dept. of Anthropology, University of New Mexico 1975-1983 Assistant to Associate Professor: Department of Anthropology, Harvard University MEMBERSHIPS Honorary 2001- Academy of Science of Saint Louis 1996- National Academy of Sciences USA Professional 1992- Paleoanthropological Society 1990- Anthropological Society of Nippon 1985- Société d’Anthropologie de Paris 1973- American Association of Physical Anthropologists AWARDS 2013 Faculty Mentor Award, Graduate School, Washington University 2011 Arthur Holly Compton Award for Faculty Achievement, Washington University 2005 Faculty Mentor Award, Graduate School, Washington University PUBLICATIONS: Books Trinkaus, E., Shipman, P. (1993) The Neandertals: Changing the Image of Mankind. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Pub. pp. 454. PUBLICATIONS: Monographs Trinkaus, E., Buzhilova, A.P., Mednikova, M.B., Dobrovolskaya, M.V. (2014) The People of Sunghir: Burials, Bodies and Behavior in the Earlier Upper Paleolithic. New York: Ox- ford University Press. pp. 339. Trinkaus, E., Constantin, S., Zilhão, J. (Eds.) (2013) Life and Death at the Peştera cu Oase. A Setting for Modern Human Emergence in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Relationships Between Human Adaptive Responses and Ecology Via Eco-Cultural Niche Modeling William E
    Assessing relationships between human adaptive responses and ecology via eco-cultural niche modeling William E. Banks To cite this version: William E. Banks. Assessing relationships between human adaptive responses and ecology via eco- cultural niche modeling. Archaeology and Prehistory. Universite Bordeaux 1, 2013. hal-01840898 HAL Id: hal-01840898 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01840898 Submitted on 11 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Thèse d'Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches Université de Bordeaux 1 William E. BANKS UMR 5199 PACEA – De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie Assessing Relationships between Human Adaptive Responses and Ecology via Eco-Cultural Niche Modeling Soutenue le 14 novembre 2013 devant un jury composé de: Michel CRUCIFIX, Chargé de Cours à l'Université catholique de Louvain, Belgique Francesco D'ERRICO, Directeur de Recherche au CRNS, Talence Jacques JAUBERT, Professeur à l'Université de Bordeaux 1, Talence Rémy PETIT, Directeur de Recherche à l'INRA, Cestas Pierre SEPULCHRE, Chargé de Recherche au CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette Jean-Denis VIGNE, Directeur de Recherche au CNRS, Paris Table of Contents Summary of Past Research Introduction ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeolithic Continental Europe
    World Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: A Characterization edited by Dan Hicks and Alice Stevenson, Archaeopress 2013, page 216-239 10 Palaeolithic Continental Europe Alison Roberts 10.1 Introduction The collection of Palaeolithic material from Continental Europe in the Pitt Rivers Museum (PRM) is almost of equivalent size to the collection from the British Isles (see Chapter 9), but is not nearly as well known or as well published. It consists mainly of material from France that seems to have been an under-acknowledged highlight of the PRM archaeological collections for most of the 20th century. Despite the obvious care with which French Palaeolithic material was acquired by the museum, especially during the curatorship of Henry Balfour, the collection has mainly been used for teaching and display, rather than as a research resource. Due to the historic lack of work on the collection so far, this chapter presents a preliminary overview, to orient and inform future research, rather than a full account of the collections. The exact numbers of Palaeolithic objects from Europe are difficult to state with certainty due to factors such as unquantified batch registration of groups of objects in the past, and missing or incorrect cultural attributions in the documentation. However, it is estimated that there are c. 3,760 Palaeolithic objects from continental Europe in the PRM, c. 534 of which are from the founding collection of the PRM (PRMFC)(1). The majority of the material comprises c. 3,585 objects from France (Figure 10.1), with smaller collections from Belgium (c. 63 objects), Italy (c.
    [Show full text]
  • New Middle Pleistocene Hominin Cranium from Gruta Da Aroeira (Portugal)
    New Middle Pleistocene hominin cranium from Gruta da Aroeira (Portugal) Joan Dauraa, Montserrat Sanzb,c, Juan Luis Arsuagab,c,1, Dirk L. Hoffmannd, Rolf M. Quamc,e,f, María Cruz Ortegab,c, Elena Santosb,c,g, Sandra Gómezh, Angel Rubioi, Lucía Villaescusah, Pedro Soutoj,k, João Mauricioj,k, Filipa Rodriguesj,k, Artur Ferreiraj, Paulo Godinhoj, Erik Trinkausl, and João Zilhãoa,m,n aUNIARQ-Centro de Arqueologia da Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade de Lisboa, 1600-214 Lisbon, Portugal; bDepartamento de Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias Geológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain; cCentro Universidad Complutense de Madrid-Instituto de Salud Carlos III de Investigación sobre la Evolución y Comportamiento Humanos, 28029 Madrid, Spain; dDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; eDepartment of Anthropology, Binghamton University-State University of New York, Binghamton, NY 13902; fDivision of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024; gLaboratorio de Evolución Humana, Universidad de Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain; hGrup de Recerca del Quaternari - Seminari d’Estudis i Recerques Prehistòriques, Department of History and Archaeology, University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain; iLaboratorio de Antropología, Departamento de Medicina Legal, Toxicología y Antropología Física, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain; jCrivarque - Estudos de Impacto e Trabalhos Geo-Arqueológicos Lda,
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    palevolcomptes rendus 2021 20 1 est rthw Iber o ia f N an o d ic b h e t y i l o o n e d a : l t a h P e L — a s t e e i t Q e u i c a o t e s r r n e a r r e y h t h a u g n - r t e DIRECTEURS DE LA PUBLICATION / PUBLICATION DIRECTORS : Bruno David, Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle Étienne Ghys, Secrétaire perpétuel de l’Académie des sciences RÉDACTEURS EN CHEF / EDITORS-IN-CHIEF : Michel Laurin (CNRS), Philippe Taquet (Académie des sciences) ASSISTANTE DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITOR : Adeline Lopes (Académie des sciences ; [email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Fariza Sissi (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle ; [email protected]) ÉDITEURS ASSOCIÉS / ASSOCIATE EDITORS (*, took charge of the editorial process of the article/a pris en charge le suivi éditorial de l’article) : Amniotes du Mésozoïque/Mesozoic amniotes Hans-Dieter Sues (Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington) Lépidosauromorphes/Lepidosauromorphs Hussam Zaher (Universidade de São Paulo) Métazoaires/Metazoa Annalisa Ferretti (Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena) Micropaléontologie/Micropalaeontology Maria Rose Petrizzo (Université de Milan) Palaeoanthropology R. Macchiarelli (Université de Poitiers, Poitiers) Paléobotanique/Palaeobotany Evelyn Kustatscher (The Museum of Nature South Tyrol, Bozen/Bolzano) Paléoichthyologie/Palaeoichthyology Philippe Janvier (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Académie des sciences, Paris) Palaeomammalogy (small mammals) L. van den Hoek Ostende (Naturalis Biodiversity Center, CR Leiden) Palaeomammalogy (large and mid-sized mammals) L. Rook (Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze) Prehistorical archaeology Marcel Otte* (Université de Liège, Liège) Tortues/Turtles Juliana Sterli (CONICET, Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio, Trelew, Argentine) COUVERTURE / COVER : Examples of quartzite handaxes found in the terrace T3 (+21-29 m) at Gándara site (A Guarda, Pontevedra).
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Metric Dental Traits and Hominin Phylogeny’ by Carter
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LJMU Research Online News and views: Response to ‘Non-metric dental traits and hominin phylogeny’ by Carter et al. (2013), with additional information on the Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System and phylogenetic ‘place’ of Australopithecus sediba Joel D. Irisha*, Debbie Guatelli-Steinbergb, Scott S. Leggec, Darryl J. de Ruiterd,e, Lee R. Bergere aResearch Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF UK bDepartment of Anthropology and Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA cDepartment of Anthropology, Macalester College, St. Paul, MN 55105 USA dDepartment of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 USA eEvolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa *Corresponding author: Joel D. Irish Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF UK [email protected] 1 Introduction Here we respond to Carter and colleagues’ (2013) remarks concerning our Science article (Irish et al., 2013). The goals for that article were to: 1) further characterize Australopithecus sediba by describing 22 Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System (ASUDAS) traits, 2) compare the traits in A. sediba with those previously recorded in other hominin samples, and 3) present initial phylogenetic analyses using these data. Given the subset of traits, out of 125 possible (below), and small A. sediba sample, our conclusion was that the results “further define [the species’] position relative to other genera,” but that “the phylogenetic place of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11334-3 — the Archaeology of the Iberian Peninsula Katina T
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11334-3 — The Archaeology of the Iberian Peninsula Katina T. Lillios Index More Information INDEX Page numbers in italics indicate figures. 4.2 kya event, 227–228, 278 natural resources, 184–185, 189–190 8.2 kya event, 107, 110–111, 134 pit sites, 249 stelae, 251 Abauntz, 66, 94, 95 Upper Paleolithic sites, 95–97 Åberg, N., 159 Algar do Bom Santo, 108, 145–146, 147 Abric Romaní, 35, 51–52 Algarve, 4 Abrics de l’Ermita, 108, 150 Beakers, 246 Abrigo de los Oculados, 108, 153 Estácio da Veiga, 21 Abrigo del Molino, 35, 48 geology, 190 Academia Portuguesa da Historia, 23–24 Gravettian sites, 69 Academia Real de Historia Portuguesa, 20 menhirs, 141, 144 Acebuchal, El, 229, 246 salt processing, 189 Acequión, El, 229, 278 subsistence practices, 73, 139 Acheulean, 44 Alicante, 150, 212 Excalibur hand axe, 45–46, 45 Allerød oscillation, 107 acoustics, of caves and rock-shelters, 98, 155 Alloru, El, 108, 125 Africa pick axe, 125 Beaker sites, 234 Almagro Basch, Martín, 17–18, 152 demographic movement from, 42–43, 60, 111, Almeida, Francisco, 1 138–139 Almendres, 108, 141–144, 143 and Iberian Neolithic, 134, 158 Almería, 150, 254 agriculture see animals, domestication of; farming; Almería culture, 202, 208 plants, domestication of Almizaraque, 172, 202–203, 206–207, 229, 251 Agroal, 229, 249 Almoloya, La, 229, 253, 254, 257–258, 298 Águas Frías, 172, 195–196 Almonda, 35, 47, 53, 59, 108, 137 Aguilera y Gamboa, Enrique de (Marqués de Alsius (i Torrent), Pere, 53 Cerralbo), 33, 46, 154 Altamira, 33, 35, 56, 65, 66, 78–82 Aguirre, Emiliano, 39 Polychrome Room, 80 Ain Hanech, 35, 42–43 Altamira Research Centre, 81 tools from, 44 Alto de la Huesera, 172, 217, 229 Aitzbitarte, 66, 92 Alto de Leião, 35 Alapraia, 24, 229, 243–244 Alto del Reinoso, 108 Albalate, 248 Alto del Romo, 229, 230 Alcácer Grau, José, 158 Altuna, Jesús, 65 Alcaide, 229, 250 Altxerri, 66, 91 Alcalar, 172, 186, 229, 246 Amalda, 35, 50 Alcalde del Río, Hermilio, 33, 82–83, 87 Amaro, G.
    [Show full text]