DOCSLIB.ORG

Trees for Global Benefits

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trees for Global Benefits Plan Vivo Project Design Document (PDD) Trees for Global Benefits Submitted by Version 2.0 Expanded and Updated: October 2016 Plot 49 Nakiwogo Road Entebbe, P. O. Box 8986 Kampala, Uganda Contact Person: Pauline Nantongo, Executive Director Tel: +256-312266419 Email: [email protected] 1 Table of Contents List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 5 Part A: Aims and objectives ......................................................................................................................... 6 A1 Description of Project’s Aims and Objectives ................................................................................... 6 Part B: Site Information ................................................................................................................................ 7 B1 Project Location and Boundaries .......................................................................................................... 7 B2 Description of the Project Area .............................................................................................................. 8 B3 Description of Land Use ......................................................................................................................... 13 Part C: Community and Livelihoods Information .................................................................................. 20 C1 Participating communities/groups .................................................................................................... 20 C2 Socio-economic Context ......................................................................................................................... 21 C3 Existing Community Structures ........................................................................................................... 21 C4 Land Tenure & Ownership of Carbon Rights .................................................................................. 21 Part D: Project Interventions & Activities ................................................................................................ 23 D1 Summary of Project Interventions ..................................................................................................... 23 D2 Summary of Project Activities for Each Intervention ................................................................... 23 D3 Effects of activities on biodiversity and the environment ......................................................... 24 Part E: Community participation .............................................................................................................. 25 E1 Participatory project design .................................................................................................................. 25 E2 Community-led implementation.......................................................................................................... 25 E3 Community-level project governance ................................................................................................ 27 Part F: Ecosystem Services & Other Project Benefits .......................................................................... 28 F1 Carbon benefits ......................................................................................................................................... 28 F2 Livelihoods benefits ................................................................................................................................. 28 F3 Ecosystem & biodiversity benefits ..................................................................................................... 29 Part G: Technical Specifications ............................................................................................................... 30 Part H: Risk Management .......................................................................................................................... 31 Part I: Project Coordination & Management .......................................................................................... 36 I1 Project Organisational Structure ........................................................................................................ 36 I2 Relationships to national organisations .......................................................................................... 38 I3 Legal compliance ...................................................................................................................................... 39 I4 Project management ............................................................................................................................... 39 I5 Project Financial management ........................................................................................................... 40 I6 Business Development & Marketing ................................................................................................. 41 I7 Operational Costs ..................................................................................................................................... 41 I8 Project Expansion & Diversification .................................................................................................. 42 I9 Technical Support ..................................................................................................................................... 43 Part J: Benefit Sharing ................................................................................................................................ 43 J1 PES agreement .......................................................................................................................................... 43 J2 Payments & Benefit Sharing ................................................................................................................ 43 Part K: Monitoring ....................................................................................................................................... 45 K1 Ecosystem services benefits ................................................................................................................ 45 K2 Socio-economic impacts ........................................................................................................................ 47 K3 Environmental and biodiversity impacts ......................................................................................... 47 K4 Other monitoring ....................................................................................................................................... 48 Annexes .............................................................................................................................................. 49 2 Annex 1. List of key staff involved......................................................................................................... 49 Annex 2. Information about funding sources ..................................................................................... 50 Annex 3. Producer/group agreement template ................................................................................. 51 Annex 4. Database template .................................................................................................................. 53 Annex 5. Examples of plan vivos ........................................................................................................... 56 Annex 6. Permits and legal documentation ........................................................................................ 57 Annex 7. Community participation ....................................................................................................... 58 Annex 8. Intent To Purchase .................................................................................................................. 59 Annex 9. Socio-Economic Baseline Survey .......................................................................................... 60 List of Tables Table 1: Location and Boundaries of the Project in Northern Uganda .................................................... 11 Table 2: Changes by Vegetation Cover Classification Using 1995 as Base Year ................................... 16 Table 3: 2010 Land Use/ Land Cover Stratification for the Project Areas .............................................. 17 Table 4: Description of Project Activities ................................................................................................... 23 Table 5: Summary of Baseline and Project Carbon Uptake ..................................................................... 28 Table 6: Livelihoods Benefits ..................................................................................................................... 28 Table 7: Summary of Expected Impacts of Project Activities on Key Environmental Services .............. 29 Table 8: Factors that Put the Delivery or Maintenance of Climate Benefits at Risk ............................... 32 Table 9: Project
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ending CHILD MARRIAGE and TEENAGE PREGNANCY in Uganda
    ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA Final Report - December 2015 ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA 1 A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA Final Report - December 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) gratefully acknowledges the valuable contribution of many individuals whose time, expertise and ideas made this research a success. Gratitude is extended to the Research Team Lead by Dr. Florence Kyoheirwe Muhanguzi with support from Prof. Grace Bantebya Kyomuhendo and all the Research Assistants for the 10 districts for their valuable support to the research process. Lastly, UNICEF would like to acknowledge the invaluable input of all the study respondents; women, men, girls and boys and the Key Informants at national and sub national level who provided insightful information without whom the study would not have been accomplished. I ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................I
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda 2015 Human Rights Report
    UGANDA 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Uganda is a constitutional republic led since 1986 by President Yoweri Museveni of the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) party. Voters re-elected Museveni to a fourth five-year term and returned an NRM majority to the unicameral Parliament in 2011. While the election marked an improvement over previous elections, it was marred by irregularities. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control over the security forces. The three most serious human rights problems in the country included: lack of respect for the integrity of the person (unlawful killings, torture, and other abuse of suspects and detainees); restrictions on civil liberties (freedoms of assembly, expression, the media, and association); and violence and discrimination against marginalized groups, such as women (sexual and gender-based violence), children (sexual abuse and ritual killing), persons with disabilities, and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) community. Other human rights problems included harsh prison conditions, arbitrary and politically motivated arrest and detention, lengthy pretrial detention, restrictions on the right to a fair trial, official corruption, societal or mob violence, trafficking in persons, and child labor. Although the government occasionally took steps to punish officials who committed abuses, whether in the security services or elsewhere, impunity was a problem. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life There were several reports the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. On September 8, media reported security forces in Apaa Parish in the north shot and killed five persons during a land dispute over the government’s border demarcation.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Decentralization: Governance Adrift | 3
    African Studies Quarterly | Volume 11, Issue 4 | Summer 2010 Decentralization and Conflict in Uganda: Governance Adrift TERRELL G. MANYAK & ISAAC WASSWA KATONO Abstract: This study examines the challenges that threaten one of Africa’s most ambitious experiments in political, administrative and fiscal decentralization. Based on extensive interviews with local government leaders throughout Uganda, the research uncovered a complex interplay of conflicts that impact decision-making effectiveness. The sources of these conflicts center around (a) the impact of national politics on local government as the country approaches the 2011 election, (b) the inability to meet rising citizen demand for services as the tax base of local governments continues to erode, (c) the corrosive impact of social conflicts stemming mostly from poverty and illiteracy complicated by tribal and ethnic differences, and (d) the challenges of developing honest and effective leadership in local government. Can Uganda unravel this web of conflicts to bring meaningful governance to this young nation? Indeed, many countries within the developing world are watching this experiment with a great deal of interest. Introduction The Uganda experiment in local government was born out of a blend of idealism and practical necessity. The idealism arose from a nation that dedicated itself to building democracy after years of brutal despotism. The practical necessity came from the need to provide basic services in an environment where local government had essentially disintegrated. The result was a multilayered system of directly elected district and lower local councils with significant responsibilities for delivering basic services. The international community strongly supported this action and hailed it as an example of how other developing countries should proceed with nation-building.1 While the local government system was initially well accepted, Ugandans now appear increasingly disenchanted with the corruption, mismanagement, and bitter political conflicts that are regularly reported in local newspapers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sironko District
    National Population and Housing Census 2014 Area Specific Profiles Sironko District April 2017 National Population and Housing Census 2014 Area Specific Profiles – Sironko District This report presents findings of National Population and Housing Census (NPHC) 2014 undertaken by the Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). Additional information about the Census may be obtained from the UBOS Head Office, Statistics House. Plot 9 Colville Street, P. O. Box 7186, Kampala, Uganda; Telephone: +256-414 706000 Fax: +256-414 237553; E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.ubos.org Cover Photos: Uganda Bureau of Statistics Recommended Citation Uganda Bureau of Statistics 2017, The National Population and Housing Census 2014 – Area Specific Profile Series, Kampala, Uganda. FOREWORD Demographic and socio-economic data are useful for planning and evidence-based decision making in any country. Such data are collected through Population Censuses, Demographic and Socio-economic Surveys, Civil Registration Systems and other Administrative sources. In Uganda, however, the Population and Housing Census remains the main source of demographic data, especially at the sub-national level. Population Census taking in Uganda dates back to 1911 and since then the country has undertaken five such Censuses. The most recent, the National Population and Housing Census 2014, was undertaken under the theme ‘Counting for Planning and Improved Service Delivery’. The enumeration for the 2014 Census was conducted in August/September 2014. The Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) worked closely with different Government Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) as well as Local Governments (LGs) to undertake the census exercise. The 2014 census provides several statistics on different aspects of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN
    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 eHEALTH MONTHLY BULLETIN Welcome to this 1st issue of the eHealth Bulletin, a production 2015 of the WHO Country Office. Disease October November December This monthly bulletin is intended to bridge the gap between the Cholera existing weekly and quarterly bulletins; focus on a one or two disease/event that featured prominently in a given month; pro- Typhoid fever mote data utilization and information sharing. Malaria This issue focuses on cholera, typhoid and malaria during the Source: Health Facility Outpatient Monthly Reports, Month of December 2015. Completeness of monthly reporting DHIS2, MoH for December 2015 was above 90% across all the four regions. Typhoid fever Distribution of Typhoid Fever During the month of December 2015, typhoid cases were reported by nearly all districts. Central region reported the highest number, with Kampala, Wakiso, Mubende and Luweero contributing to the bulk of these numbers. In the north, high numbers were reported by Gulu, Arua and Koti- do. Cholera Outbreaks of cholera were also reported by several districts, across the country. 1 Visit our website www.whouganda.org and follow us on World Health Organization, Uganda @WHOUganda WHO UGANDA eHEALTH BULLETIN February 2016 Typhoid District Cholera Kisoro District 12 Fever Kitgum District 4 169 Abim District 43 Koboko District 26 Adjumani District 5 Kole District Agago District 26 85 Kotido District 347 Alebtong District 1 Kumi District 6 502 Amolatar District 58 Kween District 45 Amudat District 11 Kyankwanzi District
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2020/21 Vote:552 Sironko District
    LG Draft Budget Estimates Vote:552 Sironko District FY 2020/21 Part I: Local Government Budget Estimates A1: Revenue Performance and Plans by Source Current Budget Performance Uganda Shillings Thousands Approved Budget for Cumulative Receipts by Draft Budget for FY FY 2019/20 End Dec for FY 2019/20 2020/21 Locally Raised Revenues 382,010 191,005 638,793 o/w Higher Local Government 382,010 191,005 262,480 o/w Lower Local Government 0 0 376,313 Discretionary Government Transfers 4,803,712 2,674,814 4,729,133 o/w Higher Local Government 3,390,648 1,849,055 3,475,655 o/w Lower Local Government 1,413,064 825,759 1,253,477 Conditional Government Transfers 25,140,060 13,766,324 26,567,214 o/w Higher Local Government 25,140,060 13,766,324 26,567,214 o/w Lower Local Government 0 0 0 Other Government Transfers 2,449,749 489,335 2,381,228 o/w Higher Local Government 2,449,749 489,335 2,381,228 o/w Lower Local Government 0 0 0 External Financing 280,092 161,936 280,098 o/w Higher Local Government 280,092 161,936 280,098 o/w Lower Local Government 0 0 0 Grand Total 33,055,622 17,283,415 34,596,465 o/w Higher Local Government 31,642,558 16,457,655 32,966,676 o/w Lower Local Government 1,413,064 825,759 1,629,790 A2: Expenditure Performance by end December 2019/20 and Plans for the next FY by Programme Approved Budget for FY Cumulative Receipts by Draft Budget for FY Uganda Shillings Thousands 2019/20 End Dec for FY 2019/20 2020/21 Administration 6,433,868 4,365,344 6,236,256 o/w Higher Local Government 6,116,177 4,273,976 4,982,779 o/w Lower Local
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Decentralization and the Management of Forest Resources in Masindi District, Uganda
    ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE IN AFRICA WORKING PAPERS: WP #8 COMMERCE, KINGS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN UGANDA: DECENTRALIZING NATURAL RESOURCES TO CONSOLIDATE THE CENTRAL STATE by Frank Emmanuel Muhereza Febuary 2003 EDITORS World Resources Institute Jesse C. Ribot and Jeremy Lind 10 G Street, NE COPY EDITOR Washington DC 20002 Florence Daviet www.wri.org ABSTRACT This study critically explores the decentralizing of forest management powers in Uganda in order to determine the extent to which significant discretionary powers have shifted to popularly elected and downwardly accountable local governments. Effective political or democratic decentralization depends on the transfer of local discretionary powers. However, in common with other states in Africa undergoing various types of “decentralization” reforms, state interests are of supreme importance in understanding forest-management reforms. The analysis centers on the transfer of powers to manage forests in Masindi District, an area rich in natural wealth located in western Uganda. The decentralization reforms in Masindi returns forests to unelected traditional authorities, as well as privatizes limited powers to manage forest resources to licensed user-groups. However, the Forest Department was interested in transferring only those powers that increased Forest Department revenues while reducing expenditures. Only limited powers to manage forests were transferred to democratically elected and downwardly accountable local governments. Actors in local government were left in an uncertain and weak bargaining position following the transfer of powers. While privatization resulted in higher Forest Department revenues, the tradeoff was greater involvement of private sector actors in the Department’s decision making. To the dismay of the Forest Department, in the process of consolidating their new powers, private-sector user groups were able to influence decision making up to the highest levels of the forestry sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty Map Report
    Poverty Maps of Uganda Mapping the Spatial Distribution of Poor Households and Child Poverty Based on Data from the 2016/17 Uganda National Household Survey and the 2014 National Housing and Population Census Technical Report October 2019 1 Acknowledgement This technical report presents the results of the Uganda poverty map update exercise, which was conducted by the Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) in close collaboration with UNICEF and the World Bank. The core task team at UBOS consisted of Mr. James Muwonge (Director of Socio-Economic Surveys), Mr. Justus Bernard Muhwezi (Manager of Geo-Information Services), Mr. Stephen Baryahirwa (Principal Statistician and Head of the Household Surveys Unit), Mr. Vincent Ssennono (Principal Statistician and Head of the Methodology and Analysis Unit), and Mr. Adriku Charles (Senior Geo-Information Officer). The core task team at the World Bank consisted of Dr. Nobuo Yoshida (Lead Economist), Dr. Carolina Mejia-Mantilla (Uganda Country Poverty Economist), Dr. Minh Cong Nguyen (Senior Economist) and Ms. Miyoko Asai (Consultant). Dr. Nobuo Yoshida and Dr. Minh Cong Nguyen supervised the exercise and ensured that the latest international experience and technical innovations were available to the team. The core task team in UNICEF consisted of Dr. Diego Angemi (Chief Social Policy and Advocacy), Mr. Arthur Muteesasira (Information Management and GIS Officer), and Ms. Sarah Kabaija (Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist). The team benefited from the support and guidance provided by Dr. Robin D. Kibuka(Chairman of the Board, UBOS), Ms. Doreen Mulenga (Country Representative, UNICEF), Mr. Antony Thompson (Country Manager, World Bank), and Dr. Pierella Paci (Practice Manager, World Bank).
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Going To
    % Funding going to Funding Country Name KP‐led Timeline Partner Name Sub‐awardees SNU1 PSNU MER Structural Interventions Allocated Organizations HTS_TST Quarterly stigma & discrimination HTS_TST_NEG meetings; free mental services to HTS_TST_POS KP clients; access to legal services PrEP_CURR for KP PLHIV PrEP_ELIGIBLE Centro de Orientacion e PrEP_NEW Dominican Republic $ 1,000,000.00 88.4% MOSCTHA, Esperanza y Caridad, MODEMU Region 0 Distrito Nacional Investigacion Integral (COIN) PrEP_SCREEN TX_CURR TX_NEW TX_PVLS (D) TX_PVLS (N) TX_RTT Gonaives HTS_TST KP sensitization focusing on Artibonite Saint‐Marc HTS_TST_NEG stigma & discrimination, Nord Cap‐Haitien HTS_TST_POS understanding sexual orientation Croix‐des‐Bouquets KP_PREV & gender identity, and building Leogane PrEP_CURR clinical providers' competency to PrEP_CURR_VERIFY serve KP FY19Q4‐ KOURAJ, ACESH, AJCCDS, ANAPFEH, APLCH, CHAAPES, PrEP_ELIGIBLE Haiti $ 1,000,000.00 83.2% FOSREF FY21Q2 HERITAGE, ORAH, UPLCDS PrEP_NEW Ouest PrEP_NEW_VERIFY Port‐au‐Prince PrEP_SCREEN TX_CURR TX_CURR_VERIFY TX_NEW TX_NEW_VERIFY Bomu Hospital Affiliated Sites Mombasa County Mombasa County not specified HTS_TST Kitui County Kitui County HTS_TST_NEG CHS Naishi Machakos County Machakos County HTS_TST_POS Makueni County Makueni County KP_PREV CHS Tegemeza Plus Muranga County Muranga County PrEP_CURR EGPAF Timiza Homa Bay County Homa Bay County PrEP_CURR_VERIFY Embu County Embu County PrEP_ELIGIBLE Kirinyaga County Kirinyaga County HWWK Nairobi Eastern PrEP_NEW Tharaka Nithi County Tharaka Nithi County
    [Show full text]
  • Forests, Livelihoods and Poverty Alleviation: the Case of Uganda Forests, Livelihoods and Poverty Alleviation: the Case of Uganda
    Forests, livelihoods and poverty alleviation: the case of Uganda Forests, livelihoods and poverty alleviation: the case of Uganda G. Shepherd and C. Kazoora with D. Mueller Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2013 The Forestry Policy and InstitutionsWorking Papers report on issues in the work programme of Fao. These working papers do not reflect any official position of FAO. Please refer to the FAO Web site (www.fao.org/forestry) for official information. The purpose of these papers is to provide early information on ongoing activities and programmes, to facilitate dialogue and to stimulate discussion. The Forest Economics, Policy and Products Division works in the broad areas of strenghthening national institutional capacities, including research, education and extension; forest policies and governance; support to national forest programmes; forests, poverty alleviation and food security; participatory forestry and sustainable livelihoods. For further information, please contact: Fred Kafeero Forestry Officer Forest Economics, Policy and Products Division Forestry Department, FAO Viale Delle terme di Caracalla 00153 Rome, Italy Email: [email protected] Website: www.fao.org/forestry Comments and feedback are welcome. For quotation: FAO.2013. Forests, Livelihoods and Poverty alleviation: the case of Uganda, by, G. Shepherd, C. Kazoora and D. Mueller. Forestry Policy and Institutions Working Paper No. 32. Rome. Cover photo: Ankole Cattle of Uganda The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression af any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Councils' Performance and Public
    Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment Plot 96, Kanjokya Street, Kamwokya P. O. Box 29836, Kampala Tel: +256 312 812150 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Website: http://www.acode-u.org LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS’ PERFORMANCE AND PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY IN UGANDA Masindi District Council Score-Card Report FY 2013/2014 Authors: Micah Asiku, Esther Obwona and OVERVIEW OF MASINDI DISTRICT Patrick Mwesigwa DURING FY2013/14 Masindi district was managed by the political and BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE technical leadership which complement each other. The political leadership was headed by Hon. M. K. This policy brief presents findings from the 2013/14 Wilson Isingoma assisted by 19 councilors including assessment of Masindi District Local Government the speaker who provided an oversight role and under the Local Government Councils’ Score-card monitored development projects to ensure quality Initiative (LGCSCI), an evidence based project service delivery. The technical leadership on the other implemented by ACODE in partnership with ULGA with hand was led by Mr. Abdallah Musobya Kiganda as the support from DGF. It seeks to enhance the effectiveness Chief Administrative officer, together with a team of of elected leaders in fulfilling their mandate and build heads of departments provided technical guidance the citizens’ capacity to demand better services. The and implemented lawful council resolutions to provide initiative is implemented in 30 districts, including services to the citizens. Masindi which was being assessed for the first time. The initiative uses the score-card – an assessment Part of Masindi district (within Murchison Falls tool - to facilitate annual performance assessments on National Park) is endowed with oil deposits where the district council, district chairperson, speaker and currently Total E&P is conducting exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda: Floods & Landslides
    UGANDA: FLOODS & LANDSLIDES Flash Update No. 1 As of 19 December 2019 HIGHLIGHTS • Torrential rains are being experienced across Uganda. According to the Uganda National Meteorological Department (UNMA), above- normal rains will continue until the end of the year. • At least 38 people have died due to floods and landslides in Bundibugyo, Bududa and Sironko districts, and over 150 people have been injured. At least 300,000 have been affected and an estimated 65,000 people are displaced, according to Government sources. • The floods and landslides have left a trail of destruction, including damaged homes, infrastructure, agriculture and livelihoods. • The Government of Uganda, with the support of humanitarian partners, is responding to the most urgent needs of people affected. SITUATION OVERVIEW Due to heavier than normal rains since September—enhanced by the positive Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD)—several districts in Uganda have been experiencing flash floods (mostly in urban areas) and landslides (in rural/hilly areas). According to preliminary estimates from a rapid assessment conducted by the Office of the Prime Minister in the most affected sub-regions of Mount Elgon and South Western Uganda in early December, at least 300,000 people have been affected, including 65,000 people reportedly displaced by the impact of heavy rains since September 2019. Over 21,500 hectares of crop and plantations are reportedly damaged in these areas. As of 17 December, 38 people have reportedly lost their lives, including in the mountainous Bundibugyo district in the western region and the Mount Elgon area in eastern Uganda. Water systems in Bundibugyo have been destroyed, exacerbating the risk of outbreaks of water-borne diseases.
    [Show full text]