Market Study

For

Proposed Rental Apartment Building at 601-605 Davis Street Evanston, IL

As of

September 2017

For

Mr. Kerry Dickson Vermilion Development 401 North Franklin Street, Suite 4 South Chicago, IL 60654.

Prepared By

Appraisal Research Counselors 400 East Randolph Street, Suite 715 Chicago, Illinois 60601

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com 400 EAST RANDOLPH STREET, SUITE 715 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60601-7388 312-565-0977 FAX 312-565-3436 www.appraisalresearch.com Eugene W. Stunard, MAI Joan A. Stunard Julie A. Kluczynski James K. Kutill, MAI Joyce A. Marquez Gail Lissner, CRE, SRA Margarita Lopez Ron DeVries, MAI, FRICS Michael W. Wingader Steven J. Kelley, MAI Jennifer A. Long Jacoub M. Hussien, SRA Gary J. Wager Ronald W. Casper, MAI Stephanie L. Doyle Peter H. Gloodt, MAI Mark A. Brenner Daniel R. Graver Kelly S. Jones Erwin C. Wirth, SRA Virginia C. Evely Alexander Jaunius, MAI Mark D. Lindsay Rebecca Franklin, MAI Brian J. Germanowski ______Patrick J. McCauley William H. Miller Patricia A. Jette Albany, New York Donald M. Livingston

Cary A. Lannin Northwest Indiana

Denise R. Navetta Central Illinois ______Betty Bogie Long (1932-2005)

October 4, 2017 Mr. Kerry Dickson Vermilion Development 401 North Franklin, Suite 4 South Chicago, IL 60654.

RE: 601-605 Davis Street, Evanston, Cook County, IL Dear Mr. Dickson:

In accordance with your request, we have prepared a market study regarding the above-referenced proposed rental apartment building.

Information for this report was researched with property inspections and conversations with brokers, developers, lenders, investors, managers, and leasing agents involved in the Suburban Chicago apartment market. On a quarterly basis since 2005, we have also researched the rental apartment market for Suburban Chicago. This ongoing work, along with our database going back 40+ years, well positions us to analyze and understand market trends specific to the proposed project.

OFFICE • RETAIL • INDUSTRIAL • MULTI-FAMILY • SENIOR CARE • HOSPITALITY • LAND • SPECIAL-USE CONDOMINIUMS • SINGLE FAMILY • COOPERATIVES • NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTIES

APPRAISALS ~ MARKET RESEARCH ~ FEASIBILITY STUDIES ~ COUNSELING

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE SINCE 1968 Mr. Kerry Dickson RE: 601-605 Davis Street, Evanston, IL October 4, 2017 – Page 2

Should you have any questions about this report or desire further consultations as you move forward with this project, please do not hesitate to call us directly.

Sincerely,

Appraisal Research Counselors

Gail L. Lissner, CRE, SRA, Vice President

3-19735B

Page 3

CERTIFICATION

We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions (see following page), and are our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved.

Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. The appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan. We are experienced and competent in appraising this property type.

To the best of our knowledge and belief, the reported analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of (1) the minimum appraisal standards effective June 7, 1994 under Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) of 1989, (2) the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), and (3) the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute.

The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to its review by duly authorized representatives. As of the date of this report, Eugene W. Stunard, MAI, Ron DeVries, MAI, FRICS, Gail Lissner, CRE, SRA, Ronald W. Casper, MAI, Jacoub M. Hussien, SRA, Peter H. Gloodt, MAI, Erwin C. Worth, SRA, Alexander Jaunius, MAI , and Rebecca Franklin, MAI have completed the requirements of the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute. No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person(s) signing this certification.

Gail Lissner, CRE, SRA inspected the site and reviewed the preliminary drawings for the apartment development.

We have provided appraisal services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment.

The professional contribution to the analyses, opinions and conclusions contained in this report is hereby acknowledged.

Gail Lissner, CRE, SRA, Vice President Illinois Certified General Real Estate Appraiser No. 553.0001842 Expires 09/30/19

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 4

ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS

The following assumptions and limiting conditions apply to our market study:

Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions

Our market study is subject to the following which may have affected the assignment results:

• None.

General

The Certification, and all analyses, opinions and conclusions are expressly subject to the following stipulations: • No responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal nature. • It is assumed that title is marketable and that the descriptive legal information furnished is correct. • Except as noted, the property is assumed in accordance with applicable local, state and federal ordinances, regulations and laws. • The physical condition of the real estate described herein was based on visual inspection, except as noted. • It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions that would render the property more or less valuable. Hidden or unapparent conditions include but are not limited to soundness of members, equipment, soil conditions or environmental contamination. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions, their effects or for arranging engineering studies that may be required to discover them. • Any plots, diagrams or drawings presented are only to facilitate and aid the reader and are not meant to be used in matters of survey or for any other purpose. • Any distribution of value applies only as presented or discussed. Value distributions include but are not limited to leased fee and leasehold and land and building allocations. • Portions of this report should not be relied upon except in the context of the whole. • All analyses, opinions and conclusions assume responsible ownership and competent management. • No persons signing or identified as contributing to this report shall be required to give testimony or appear in court by reason of this report with reference to the property herein described, unless prior arrangements have been made. • As used herein, report is defined to include both the written version and information contained in our files. • Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions, the identity of persons signing or contributing to this report or the firm with which they are connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute or to the MAI or SRA designation) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising media, public relations media, news media, sales media or any other public means of communication without prior written consent and approval. • We, however, hereby consent to your referencing this report in your company's financial statements or other required statements, provided that: 1) prior to making such reference in any publication, including any filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or other governmental agency, we are allowed to review the same so as to insure the accuracy and adequacy of such reference to our report; 2) in our sole discretion such reference is not untrue or misleading and is accurate and adequate for the purposes intended and in light of the circumstances under which it is made; and 3) any reference to such report include the following language: "In addition to setting forth our analyses, opinions and conclusions, the report contains a description of the property that is the subject of this assignment; a statement of the various facts, assumptions and conditions upon which the analyses and opinions were based; the conclusions and certain limiting conditions which relate to the report. The portions of the report referred to herein are qualified in their entireties by reference to the complete report, which will be made available upon written request, to any person who has a proper purpose in reviewing the same. The report or portions of the report should not be relied upon except in the context of the whole. The terms of our engagement are such that we have no obligation to update or revise the report or our analyses, opinions and conclusions in any manner because of events or transactions occurring subsequent to the date of the report." • The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of this property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property, together with a detailed analysis of the requirements of the ADA, could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the require- ments of the Act. If so, this fact could have a negative effect upon the value of the property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not consider non-compliance with the requirements of the ADA in estimating the value of the property, unless otherwise stated in the scope of this report.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 5

SCOPE OF WORK

Client/Intended User(s)

The client identified on the certification page is the intended user of this report.

Use of the Consulting Report

This report is prepared for exclusive use by the addressee for internal analysis and planning purposes.

Purpose of the Consulting Assignment

The purpose of this report is to provide:

• An overview of the Evanston rental apartment market

• An analysis of the market demand for new rental apartments at this location

• Survey and overview of the rental competition in the market

• Critique of the proposed project’s unit mix and unit sizes, with recommendations for the most marketable mix of unit types, sizes, finishes, and amenities

• Conclusions regarding the market rents in current dollars and at delivery along with absorption forecast for subject units at delivery

Effective Date

The effective date of the analysis and conclusions is September 2017.

Sources of Data / Extent of Research

An inspection of the neighborhood was completed along with a review of the Development Summary prepared by Solomon Cordwell Buenz dated August 28, 2017.

The following data sources were researched:

• Inspection of the site • Visual inspection of the immediate neighborhood • Ongoing discussions with brokers, developers, lenders and investors active in the suburban Chicago rental market • Inspection of the competing rental buildings in the market and discussions with management and leasing agents • Previous assignments where information was not confidential

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Certification ...... 3 Assumptions And Limiting Conditions ...... 4 Scope of Work ...... 5 Table Of Contents ...... 6 Executive Summary and Conclusions ...... 7 Suburban Chicago Apartment Market Overview ...... 24 Suburban Multi-Family Housing Supply ...... 39 Demographic Trends – Evanston ...... 44 Rental Competition Survey ...... 49 New Rental Development – Lease-up Absorption Survey ...... 81

Addenda

Qualifications ...... A

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Rendering of 601-601 Davis

Location: 601-605 Davis, Evanston, Cook County, IL

Concept: The subject property is proposed for development as a 318 unit, 33-story high-rise rental apartment building on the north side of Davis Street, just west of Chicago Avenue. The project architect is Solomon Cordwell Buenz. The project which will retain the commercial building at the corner of Davis and Chicago Avenue is proposed with the following residential unit mix:

Unit Type No. Units % SF Range Avg SF Total SF Studio/1 Bath 58 18.2% 505-515 511 29,610 Conv/1 Bath 52 16.4% 540 540 28,080 1BR/1 Bath 84 26.4% 710-750 742 62,360 2BR/2 Bath 98 30.8% 1,050-1,245 1,151 112,820 3BR/3 Bath 26 8.2% 1,490-1,515 1,502 39,040 Total/Avg 318 100.0% 505-1,515 855 271,910

There will also be 176 parking spaces, indicating a parking ratio of .55:1.

Conclusion: Based upon our review of the market, the unit mix and sizes appear well suited for the market. Market rents in current dollars have been projected to average approximately $3.03 PSF in 2017 dollars. Typically, we would anticipate annual rent increases of approximately 2%. However, with the inventory projected to be added to the market,

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 8

the rent increases may be difficult to achieve in the short term as projects lease-up. We have also projected the lease-up of the property in approximately 18 to 24 months.

Appraisal Research Counselors’ Conclusions:

Property Location: The subject property is located in the downtown area of Evanston, approximately 12 miles north of Chicago’s central business district (“The Loop”). Its location in downtown Evanston is considered to be excellent due to its proximity to Northwestern University’s lakefront campus and its proximity to a vibrant mix of restaurants, shops, and retail amenities located in the downtown area. Its location at Chicago and Davis is considered to be excellent, situated a few blocks from the lakefront, a few blocks from the Metra/CTA, a few blocks from Northwestern University, and in a core area of the downtown market which offers excellent retail facilities and restaurants. In addition, it is next to the Whole Foods store, which is considered to be extremely desirable. The other attractive component of the subject property’s location is its location close to the eastern edge of downtown, with a charming residential district to the east.

Recent construction in the immediate neighborhood has included the renovation and addition to the Merion, a luxury retirement community at 1611-19 Chicago Avenue, along with the construction of a Hyatt House (hotel) at 1515 Chicago Avenue. In addition, Fountain Square is currently undergoing renovation, ½ block west of the subject property at Davis and Orrington/Sherman.

Renter Profile: The subject property will attract a diverse group of renters, with demand expected to be strong due to its desirable locational attributes. Evanston has a major demand generator – Northwestern University. This provides a need for housing by faculty, staff, graduate students, and undergraduate students. Because of the presence of the university, downtown Evanston is able to command the highest rents in the metropolitan suburban region while also experiencing an expansion of its downtown housing inventory. Leasing and management personnel in the competing buildings in the downtown market report a strong presence of Northwestern-related renters (particularly graduate students) providing sustained demand for rental apartments including luxury rental units.

Evanston is also able to attract young professionals who are employed in the suburbs, as it is situated close to the border with Chicago, has a less suburban and more “youthful” image, and offers good accessibility and proximity to the city. Downtown Evanston is also a popular location for couples who commute in opposite directions, as this becomes a convenient midpoint location for those working both north and south of Evanston.

Divorcing or divorced persons are also expected to comprise a portion of the renter profile, as parents often way to stay in the same area as their families, particularly when they are in the process of obtaining a divorce.

Empty nesters also comprise a segment of the market demand which could potentially be more significant. This will include both persons who are downsizing from the immediate area along with persons relocating from outside the region to be closer to their children and grandchildren who live in the North Shore area. It is expected that a portion of these empty-nester residents may only be part- time residents, as they may have a second/winter home in a warmer climate. With its established, core location in the downtown market adjacent to residential areas to the east, this location is expected to be very desirable to the empty nester demographic. It is basically a “walk to everything”, very convenient downtown Evanston location. Some of the newer properties in the market have been developed on the

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 9

fringes of the downtown area while the subject property has a very established location which will greatly enhance its desirability to the empty nesters.

Thus, there is a diverse renter profile that is expected to be attracted to the subject property.

Competition Overview: Eleven properties with approximately 1,800 units were identified as providing potential competition to the subject units. These developments are all located in Evanston, extending from Central Street on the north to Main Street on the south, with one additional property which is located in downtown Wilmette and beginning occupancy in the fall of 2017. Nine of the 11 properties were developed post-2000 while two were developed in the 1990s. The average unit sizes range from 799 to 1,105 SF, with several of the buildings having an overall average unit size which is similar to the subject property. These projects also range in size from approximately 50 to 350 units, with the subject building being one of the largest buildings in its competitive set.

The following is a summary of the units which comprise the existing competition to the subject property:

Rent Survey Summary

Unit Type No. Units % Avg SF Quoted Avg PSF Net Effec Avg PSF Rent Rent Studio 132 7.3% 541 $1,772 $3.28 $1,757 $3.25 Convertible 33 1.8% 632 $1,984 $3.14 $1,947 $3.08 One Bedroom 904 50.1% 750 $2,134 $2.84 $2,118 $2.82 1BR+Den 71 3.9% 952 $2,746 $2.88 $2,712 $2.85 Two Bedroom 532 29.5% 1,109 $2,914 $2.63 $2,887 $2.60 2BR+Den 28 1.6% 1,237 $3,869 $3.13 $3,807 $3.08 Three Bedroom 105 5.8% 1,453 $3,907 $2.69 $3,875 $2.67 Total 1805 100.0%

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 10

Buildings Comprising the Existing Competition to the Subject Property © 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors, All Rights Reserved Total Date Avg Size Quoted Effective Name Address Suburb Submarket Units Built (SF) Rent PSF Rent PSF Occup. Subject 601-605 Davis Evanston Downtown 318 Proposed 855

1717 1717 Ridge Evanston Downtown 175 2013 835 $2.81 $2.81 98.30% Centrum Evanston 1590 Elmwood Evanston Downtown 101 2017 910 $3.00 $3.00 in lease-up E2 1890 Maple Evanston Downtown 356 2015 799 $3.24 $3.24 94.90% Evanston Place 1715-1735 Chicago Ave Evanston Downtown 190 1991 864 $2.88 $2.88 96.84% Park Evanston 1630 Chicago Avenue Evanston Downtown 283 1997 923 $2.67 $2.67 98.90% The Reserve at Evanston 1930 Ridge Avenue Evanston Downtown 193 2003 839 $2.32 $2.32 98.40%

1620 Central 1620 Central Evanston North of DT 47 2017 1,105 $2.42 $2.42 in lease-up Central Station Apts. 1720 Central Street Evanston North of DT 80 2013 965 $2.63 $2.41 92.50% Residences of Wilmette 617 Green Bay Road Wilmette North of DT 75 2017 1,013 $2.98 $2.98 in lease-up

AMLI at Evanston 737 Chicago Avenue Evanston South of DT 195 2013 1,042 $2.31 $2.31 91.80% The Main 847 Chicago Evanston South of DT 112 2016 889 $2.70 $2.48 in lease-up Total 1807

Red: Appraisal Research Counselors’ projected average rent for the subject property

Evanston has experienced a large amount of new rental apartment development activity in the past five years, as evidenced by the fact that 8 of the 11 properties comprising competition have been built since 2013. While there were over 2,000 new unit deliveries in the overall suburban market during 2013, 450 of these units were located in Evanston alone, with one in downtown (1717), one on Central Street in north Evanston (Central Station) and one in the Chicago and Main/south Evanston corridor (Amli Evanston). Again in 2015, 356 units were delivered in the E2 building, with 112 units delivered at the Main in 2016 and two buildings delivered in 2017 (Centrum Evanston and 1620 Central).

The new and existing Class A buildings in the Evanston market are currently commanding rents ranging from approximately $2.31 PSF outside of the Downtown area to $3.24 PSF in Downtown Evanston. These downtown premiums are representative of how desirable renters find the downtown Evanston location.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 11

Clearly, full amenity buildings situated in downtown Evanston are able to command rent premiums in the market. Evanston Place and the Park Evanston, both developed in the 1990s, are commanding rents averaging between $2.67 and $2.84 PSF for buildings which are now 20 to 25 years old. While Evanston Place has undergone some renovations over time, neither building has been updated to the level to compete with the new construction properties in the market. Regardless, these buildings are still able to command very strong rents for 20 to 25 year old units. Thus, the excellent location of these two properties is reflected in its strong rent levels.

The two newer downtown buildings are Centrum Evanston and E2 which are renting between $3.00 to $3.24 PSF. Centrum Evanston is the newest addition to the Downtown Evanston market, starting occupancy in late August 2017 in time for the 2017/2018 academic year. Its lobby and common area spaces appear to be more oriented towards a student/grad student tenant profile while the subject property will be more luxurious and designed to appeal to a broader mix of residents, including empty nesters. E2 clearly represents the top of the rental market in downtown Evanston at the present time and has an amenity package which surpasses all of the competition. With amenities including an indoor basketball court, its amenities have contributed significantly to its popularity in the market.

The one downtown building which appears to be lagging the market is the 193-unit Reserve which was constructed in 2003. It consists of a series of 4-story buildings located along the Metra tracks. The unit finishes are more dated, lacking amenities like stainless steel appliances although the units are very nice and the complex has good amenities (fitness center and outdoor swimming pool).

In addition to the downtown market, we have also included the Class A buildings which have been developed in the Chicago and Main corridor along with the Central Street corridor. Both of these locations have good access to transit, but lack downtown Evanston locations. Situated just north of the Central Street corridor is the Residences of Wilmette which was included because it is the newest luxury North Shore building to be added to the market. This building will not appeal to a student population but will provide some secondary competition, particularly for the empty nesters in the market. Due to their lack of proximity to Northwestern University, these secondary locations are not able to command the premiums which are generated by downtown locations which are a short walk from the University. Due to the location difference, these buildings are considered to provide only secondary competition to the subject property.

In addition to the existing competition, there are also additional buildings which are in proposed for construction in Downtown Evanston along with the subject property. These projects have the potential to add 999 units to the Downtown market, including the 318 units in the subject building.

Total Date Name Address Suburb Submarket Units Built

Proposed Downtown Competition 601-05 Davis 601-05 Davis Evanston Downtown 318 proposed 831 Emerson 831 Emerson Evanston Downtown 242 zoning approved 1450-1508 Sherman 1450-1508 Sherman Evanston Downtown 287 proposed Northlight Theatre 1700 blk Sherman Evanston Downtown 152 proposed Subtotal 999

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 12

Critique of the Unit Mix and Sizes: The subject property is proposed with units ranging from studio to three bedroom units and sizes of 505 to 1,515 sf. Overall, the building provides a good balance of unit types. With a large component (34.59%) of studio/convertible units which will attract renters desirous of living in a luxury building but at a lower chunk rent, its studio/convertible component actually is larger than its one bedroom units which represent only 26.42% of the units. We concur with this mix as it provides the opportunity to target what appears to be more under- served segment of the market. In terms of its larger unit sizes, there are 30.82% two bedroom units and 8.18% three bedroom units. It is expected that the two and three bedroom units will be marketable to roommates, couples, and empty nesters.

The floor plans which were provided with this assignment delineated the overall layouts, with few details. The 505 to 515 SF studio units appear to be rather deep units, and it does not appear that any bedroom alcove areas have been provided. Thus, these will be typical sized studios with standard layouts. The convertible units which are labelled as junior one bedrooms on the floor plans have 540 SF and appear to have outstanding layouts. These are very shallow units with broad window expanses, especially considering that they have only 540 SF, which is a mere 25 to 35 SF more than the studio units in the building. Although they have only a small amount of additional square footage, their utility is far superior to the studio layouts due to their separate bedroom alcoves with a partial partition. These will be extremely popular and will be able to generate top rents on a per square foot basis. In addition, they are expected to lease up more rapidly than the other layouts in the building.

The one bedroom units range in size from 710 to 750 SF. Similar to the studio units, they appear to be deep units but with rather traditional layouts.

On floors 7 to 23, the two bedroom units are located on three corners of the building and have a split bedroom arrangement. They range in size from 1,050 to 1,160 SF and appear to have layouts which are very functional and provide excellent expanses of glass. However, on floors 24 to 32, there are additional two bedroom units with 1,175 SF which are located on the north side of the building in non-corner locations. The Park Evanston, situated to the north of the subject property, is a 24 story building, so it is assumed that the north views on the 24th floor will clear this building. While these interior two bedroom units will also have split bedroom layouts, they will lack the drama of the corner locations.

On the southeast corner of the building is a tier of three bedroom units which extends the full height of the building. These units range in size from 1,490 to 1,515 SF and are similar to the corner two bedrooms in layout.

Overall, the units appear to be functional and in line with current design trends and demand trends seen in the rental market.

Critique of the Unit Finishes: While we were not provided with a list of finishes for the subject unit, it is anticipated that the units will contain the standard finishes found in new luxury rental buildings in the market. These include the following:

Kitchens: a contemporary cabinet, stainless steel appliances, granite or quartz counter tops, tile backsplash and undermount sink.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 13

In-unit washer dryer: Each unit will need a washer and dryer, a necessity in the market. Typically, this will be a full-size, stacked unit although side-by-side units could be considered for the larger units.

Flooring: The current trend is some sort of wood-look flooring, whether hardwood or a laminate/vinyl plan flooring (faux wood) that has the appearance of wood. Residents are now preferring the continuity of this flooring throughout the residence, including the bedrooms.

Baths: Bath finishes should be upgraded ceramic tile/stone floor and tub/shower surrounds with contemporary finishes, which is what is standard in the market. Mirrors, vanities, and accessories etc. should be good quality and good design.

HVAC: HVAC, water, sewer, and trash costs will be passed on to the residents through a RUBS system or separate billing.

Ceiling: Ceilings should have drywall finishes and be at least 9’ in height.

Overall, these finishes will meet the expectations of luxury renters in the market.

Recommendations for the Common Area Amenities: The common area amenities will be located on two floors of the building: the 6th floor and the 33rd floor. The 6th floor will contain the fitness center, yoga room, golf simulator room, game lounge, tech lounge, and club room with a “social kitchen”. There will also be an outdoor swimming pool with a large deck area and barbecue area plus a dog run on the opposite site of the building. There will be a tiny outdoor fitness area accessed from the fitness center. On the 33rd floor, there will be a club room with kitchen, private dining room, and outdoor deck. The one amenity that appears to be missing from this plan is a conference room. In fact, conference rooms have become so popular and well utilized that many developers are now adding multiple, small conference rooms in rental buildings. With this amenity particularly marketable to persons who work from home, we suggest that this amenity be added to the property.

The property will also have a parking garage at the base of the building which will accommodate 176 cars, indicating a parking ratio of .55:1. With the subject property’s core downtown location along with consideration of its 34.59% studio/convertible unit mix, it is anticipated that parking demand will be accommodated in the building.

Recommended Units and Rents (average): Based upon our survey of rental properties which provide alternatives to the subject units, we have recommended an average rental rate which equates to approximately $3.03 PSF in 2017 dollars. Typically, we would anticipate annual rent increases of approximately 2%. However, with the inventory projected to be added to the market, the rent increases may be difficult to achieve in the short term as projects lease-up.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 14

601-605 Davis – Projected Rents (2017)

Unit Type No. Units % SF Range Avg SF Total SF Avg Est. Rent Total Rent Rent PSF Studio/1 Bath 58 18.2% 505-515 511 29,610 $1,800 $104,400 $3.53 Conv/1 Bath 52 16.4% 540 540 28,080 $2,000 $104,000 $3.70 1BR/1 Bath 84 26.4% 710-750 742 62,360 $2,200 $184,800 $2.96 2BR/2 Bath 98 30.8% 1,050-1,245 1,151 112,820 $3,200 $313,600 $2.78 3BR/3 Bath 26 8.2% 1,490-1,515 1,502 39,040 $4,500 $117,000 $3.00 Total/Avg 318 100.0% 505-1,515 855 271,910 $2,591 $823,800 $3.03

It is also assumed that the utility charges will be paid by the residents, as is typical of newer properties in the overall market. Parking is estimated at an additional $160 per space per month. Estimated Absorption: Downtown Evanston continues to exhibit strong lease-up absorption although the market may be more competitive at the time when the subject property is engaged in lease-up due to the active pipeline of proposed projects. Overall, we are projecting a lease-up pace of approximately 15 to 20 units per month, which would indicate a lease-up in approximately 18 to 24 months. Because of the seasonal nature of leasing in general, it will be beneficial to time unit deliveries which coincide with the spring/summer leasing season which is the strongest time period for leasing.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 15

Neighborhood Map

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 16

Aerial view (subject rendering shown with arrow)

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 17

Summary of Proposed Development

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 18

First Floor

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 19

6th Floor Amenities

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 20

Typical Floor Plans

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 21

Floors 24-32

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 22

Level 33 Amenity Floor

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 23

Unit Matrix

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 24

SUBURBAN CHICAGO APARTMENT MARKET OVERVIEW

Market area defined. The Suburban Chicago market is defined as including Cook, Lake, McHenry, Kane, Kendall, DuPage and Will counties. Properties located within the city of Chicago are of course excluded from the survey.

Submarkets Cook County-Northwest Cook County-South DuPage County Kane-Kendall Counties Lake County McHenry County Naperville-Aurora North Shore Waukegan-Gurnee Will County

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 25

Survey property profile. The database for the Suburban Chicago survey includes 300+ complexes with a total of over 95,000 dwelling units indicating an average development size of just over 300 units. Our survey includes virtually every major apartment community developed since 1995 plus older developments (primarily post-1970) throughout the MSA. The data was gathered by direct contact with on-site staff and/or ownership.

Rent Trends & Concessions. Median net rent per square foot is at $1.45 which is up 3.3 percent from a year ago and accompanied by a drop in occupancy. One bedroom units have a median net rent of $1,209 per month while two bedrooms are at $1,432. Compared to two years ago, net rent growth has amounted to a positive 8.5 percent. We expect rent growth to continue trending upward in the near term for the overall suburban market due to demand fundamentals, occupancy levels and limited new supply in most markets.

Concessions are a marketing tool used to react to current demand without the need for continually adjusting “market” rents. The percent of complexes offering concessions is over 20 which is fairly steady over the last several quarters. The amount of the concession, currently offered at just less than one month per lease year, has been flat over the past two years. Concessions are expected to remain in the market over the next year.

Occupancy. Physical occupancy is at 95.5 percent for the entire market – down 160bps from a year ago as well as two years ago. At just 95+ percent occupancy, the suburban market overall is considered “full” indicating pricing will continue to escalate in spite of the modest amount of new supply being added. We expect occupancy to remain steady in the near term with owners continuing to push rents in spite of the downward trend in occupancy.

Market Revenue Performance. Market revenue performance is a function of the product of net rent and occupancy.

Market Revenue Performance Net Rent PSF x Occupancy 1.50 (c) 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors

1.40

1.30

1.20

MRP Index 1.10

1.00

0.90 2q07 4q07 2q08 4q08 2q09 4q09 2q10 4q10 2q11 4q11 2q12 4q12 2q13 4q13 2q14 4Q14 2Q15 4Q15 2Q16 4Q16 2Q17

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 26

Market revenue performance for the overall suburban market remains strong. The modest downward trends in the last quarters of the year are seasonal.

New construction/Communities in Lease-up.

There are a number of projects under construction throughout the MSA. Details are presented in the Submarket and the Housing Supply sections.

Several of the projects we are tracking are mid-rise buildings on in-fill sites rather than traditional walk up complexes. These have been favored in redeveloping downtown areas where transit oriented development is needed but the all in costs of construction at over $300 per square foot or $300,000+ per unit (wrap product) require fairly high rent levels for project feasibility. Walk up product cost is in the $125,000-$135,000 per unit range (not including soft costs or land).

In response to the inability to add new product to the market, owners are undertaking renovation projects in order to capitalize on demand for higher end product. Renovations often include replacing cabinetry, counters, fixtures and floor coverings.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 27

All Suburban Apartments - 2q17 Showing median trend lines

Net Rent PSF - $1.45 Snapshot & Trends

$1.50 Suburban Metro

$1.45 Complexes 316 Units 96,247 SF/unit 906 $1.40 Yr Built 1986 Net PSF $1.45  $1.35 Occupancy 95.5%  Pct W/concessions 20.3%  $1.30 Concession Amt 7.7%  One Bdrm/Mo $1,209  $1.25 2q15 3q15 4q15 1q16 2q16 3q16 4q16 1q17 2q17 Two Bdrm/Mo $1,432 

Median $ 1.34 1.33 1.34 1.39 1.41 1.38 1.39 1.44 1.45

Occupancy - 95.5% Net One Bdrm - $1,209/mo

$1,240$3.50 98% $1,220 $3.00 97% $1,200 $2.50 $1,180 96% $1,160$2.00 95% $1,140$1.50 $1,120 94% $1.00 $1,100 93% $0.50 $1,080 92% $1,060$0.00 2q15 3q15 4q15 1q16 2q16 3q16 4q16 1q17 2q17 2q152q153q153q154q154q151q161q162q162q163q163q164q164q16 1q171q17 2q172q17

Median % 96.7 96.7 95.4 96.3 97.1 96.1 95.3 94.5 95.5 Median $ 1,104 1,100 1,084 1,130 1,162 1,142 1,135 1,188 1,209

Concessions - 7.7% when offered Net Two Bdrm - $1,432/mo  11% Complexes offering concessions 65% $1,460$3.50 10% $1,440 55% $3.00 9% $1,420 $2.50 45% $1,400 8% $1,380$2.00 7% 35% $1,360$1.50 6% 25% $1,340 $1.00 5% $1,320 15% $0.50 4% $1,300 3% 5% $1,280$0.00 2q15 3q15 4q15 1q16 2q16 3q16 4q16 1q17 2q17 2q152q153q153q154q154q151q161q162q162q16 3q163q16 4q164q16 1q171q17 2q172q17

Median % 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 Median $ 1,318 1,321 1,314 1,362 1,368 1,355 1,357 1,400 1,432

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 28

Performance by Property Class

The suburban survey dataset includes has the following characteristics:

Class A Class B Class C

Distribution (units) 25% 35% 40%

Median Year Built 2006 1987 1972

Median Unit Size (sf) 975 884 839

Average Complex Size 257 342 311

Property Classes are generally defined as follow:

Class A - Newer properties that have generally been constructed since the early 1990s. Amenities often include open layout floor plans, 9 foot ceilings, in-unit washer and dryer, high quality cabinetry and potentially granite counters and stainless steel appliances. Some communities have direct entry garages. The complex typically has a clubhouse, fitness center and swimming pool.

Class B - Typically constructed in the 1980s but may include older product that has been significantly renovated. Amenities often include open layout floor plans, 8 foot ceilings, in-unit washer and dryer, good quality cabinetry and laminate counters. The complex typically has a clubhouse, fitness center and swimming pool.

Class C - Typically constructed in the 1970s with limited renovations, if any. Units typically have older style floor plans (such as galley style, closed kitchens), average quality cabinetry and laminate counters. The complex may have a clubhouse and swimming pool but the quality is generally average. Laundry facilities are typically limited to a laundry room in the complex.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 29

Net Rent PSF by Property Class $1.80 $1.70 $1.60 $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.20 $1.10 $1.00 $0.90 Class A Class B Class C $0.80 2004.4 2005.2 2005.4 2006.2 2006.4 2007.2 2007.4 2008.2 2008.4 2009.2 2009.4 2010.2 2010.4 2011.2 2011.4 2012.2 2012.4 2013.2 2013.4 2014.2 2014.4 2015.2 2015.4 2016.2 2016.4 2017.2

There was a clear bifurcation in performance by property class in 2010 with gains in net rent achieved primarily in the Class A and B markets while Class C properties lagged. The Class C market turned in 2011 with product gaining momentum primarily due to the rising cost of A and B product. On a year over year basis, rents psf increased 2.8%, 0.6% and 3.6% for A, B and C product respectively. The monthly “chunk” rent spread is shown below. Class A product chunk pricing averages a 25.5% premium over B and B product is 19.0% over C.

Monthly Rent by Property Class $1,800

$1,600

$1,400

$1,200

$1,000

$800 Class A Class B Class C $600 2004.4 2005.2 2005.4 2006.2 2006.4 2007.2 2007.4 2008.2 2008.4 2009.2 2009.4 2010.2 2010.4 2011.2 2011.4 2012.2 2012.4 2013.2 2013.4 2014.2 2014.4 2015.2 2015.4 2016.2 2016.4 2017.2

After tracking fairly consistent for years, a 100 basis point spread in occupancy between A/B versus C product emerged in 2010 and continued through 2q13. Starting in 3q13 the spread moved back to

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 30 traditional patterns. Occupancy for all classes declined in 4q15 in part due to seasonality of the rental market but strengthened in 1q16. The 3q16 numbers showed another dip in the market which continued into 1Q17. The trend reversed in 2Q17.

Occupancy by Property Class

98.0%

96.0%

94.0%

92.0%

90.0%

88.0% Class A Class B Class C 86.0% 2004.4 2012.4 2005.2 2005.4 2006.2 2006.4 2007.2 2007.4 2008.2 2008.4 2009.2 2009.4 2010.2 2010.4 2011.2 2011.4 2012.2 2013.2 2013.4 2014.2 2014.4 2015.2 2015.4 2016.2 2016.4 2017.2

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 31

Summary of Rent, Occupancy & Concession Trends by Submarket

The following trends by submarket are based on our quarterly survey of over 90,000 units. Detailed analysis of the data is contained within the submarket reports.

Net Rent PSF by Submarket

Submarket 2q13 3q13 4q13 1q14 2q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Y/Y Chng 2 Yr Chng Cook NW $1.29 $1.30 $1.31 $1.32 $1.33 $1.35 $1.36 $1.38 $1.41 $1.43 $1.41 $1.46 $1.49 $1.46 $1.46 $1.50 $1.50 0.5% 6.1% Cook South $1.14 $1.17 $1.17 $1.17 $1.17 $1.20 $1.21 $1.21 $1.23 $1.23 $1.19 $1.22 $1.27 $1.27 $1.25 $1.29 $1.30 2.8% 6.3% DuPage $1.22 $1.23 $1.23 $1.24 $1.26 $1.25 $1.28 $1.31 $1.32 $1.31 $1.31 $1.34 $1.37 $1.37 $1.36 $1.40 $1.42 3.6% 7.6% Kane/Kendall $1.14 $1.16 $1.16 $1.15 $1.17 $1.17 $1.18 $1.20 $1.22 $1.22 $1.23 $1.26 $1.27 $1.29 $1.27 $1.29 $1.29 2.2% 6.5% Lake $1.24 $1.30 $1.32 $1.31 $1.34 $1.39 $1.36 $1.40 $1.49 $1.46 $1.45 $1.44 $1.48 $1.47 $1.43 $1.48 $1.54 4.7% 3.4% McHenry $1.01 $1.07 $1.01 $1.01 $1.03 $1.01 $1.04 $1.08 $1.08 $1.07 $1.09 $1.12 $1.13 $1.13 $1.13 $1.13 $1.13 0.1% 5.3% Naperville/Aurora $1.27 $1.26 $1.26 $1.26 $1.28 $1.29 $1.30 $1.35 $1.35 $1.35 $1.38 $1.41 $1.44 $1.41 $1.43 $1.47 $1.47 2.2% 8.5% North Shore $2.07 $2.22 $2.11 $2.06 $2.20 $2.19 $2.19 $2.16 $2.16 $2.17 $2.13 $2.18 $2.19 $2.27 $2.22 $2.20 $2.40 9.8% 11.3% Waukegan/Gurnee $1.01 $1.05 $1.06 $1.08 $1.03 $1.09 $1.05 $1.05 $1.04 $1.07 $1.06 $1.10 $1.12 $1.12 $1.09 $1.11 $1.15 2.6% 9.9% Will $1.14 $1.16 $1.15 $1.14 $1.15 $1.15 $1.20 $1.22 $1.25 $1.27 $1.20 $1.23 $1.23 $1.28 $1.28 $1.30 $1.34 8.7% 6.5% All Suburban $1.22 $1.23 $1.23 $1.24 $1.25 $1.27 $1.29 $1.32 $1.34 $1.33 $1.34 $1.39 $1.41 $1.38 $1.39 $1.44 $1.45 3.3% 8.5% Note: Quarterly net rent values are rounded for display purposes but not for Yr/Yr Change calculations.

One Bedroom Median Rent by Submarket

Submarket 2q13 3q13 4q13 1q14 2q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Y/Y Chng 2 Yr Chng Cook NW $1,007 $1,016 $1,052 $1,035 $1,086 $1,093 $1,098 $1,125 $1,131 $1,127 $1,131 $1,183 $1,207 $1,150 $1,187 $1,211 $1,212 0.4% 7.1% Cook South $810 $810 $830 $843 $877 $877 $872 $893 $908 $908 $919 $930 $1,010 $990 $955 $978 $1,006 -0.3% 10.9% DuPage $980 $975 $975 $972 $1,020 $1,027 $1,013 $1,039 $1,059 $1,037 $1,036 $1,089 $1,105 $1,100 $1,086 $1,111 $1,148 3.8% 8.4% Kane/Kendall $838 $863 $875 $879 $908 $908 $930 $908 $885 $885 $910 $967 $930 $942 $949 $1,000 $981 5.5% 10.9% Lake $1,086 $1,020 $1,043 $1,138 $1,132 $1,177 $1,155 $1,142 $1,153 $1,134 $1,143 $1,148 $1,199 $1,182 $1,115 $1,176 $1,273 6.2% 10.4% McHenry $790 $829 $793 $813 $804 $794 $818 $831 $835 $835 $866 $877 $885 $885 $885 $884 $874 -1.3% 4.7% Naperville/Aurora $1,082 $1,081 $1,077 $1,094 $1,136 $1,123 $1,151 $1,162 $1,203 $1,203 $1,188 $1,251 $1,249 $1,240 $1,259 $1,252 $1,283 2.7% 6.7% North Shore $1,799 $1,750 $1,739 $1,754 $1,829 $1,752 $1,725 $1,782 $1,776 $1,728 $1,701 $1,754 $1,842 $1,858 $1,828 $1,799 $1,922 4.3% 8.2% Waukegan/Gurnee $790 $763 $795 $840 $823 $843 $839 $854 $812 $825 $823 $820 $845 $812 $790 $798 $810 -4.1% -0.2% Will $900 $900 $795 $803 $804 $887 $970 $935 $978 $993 $965 $1,015 $1,015 $1,035 $1,008 $1,050 $1,050 3.4% 7.4% All Suburban $984 $991 $998 $998 $1,033 $1,040 $1,049 $1,085 $1,104 $1,100 $1,084 $1,131 $1,162 $1,142 $1,135 $1,188 $1,209 4.0% 9.5% Note: Quarterly net rent values are rounded for display purposes but not for Yr/Yr Change calculations.

Two Bedroom Median Rent by Submarket

Submarket 2q13 3q13 4q13 1q14 2q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Y/Y Chng 2 Yr Chng Cook NW $1,255 $1,255 $1,280 $1,271 $1,281 $1,275 $1,278 $1,334 $1,343 $1,340 $1,348 $1,394 $1,408 $1,375 $1,390 $1,419 $1,446 2.8% 7.7% Cook South $1,060 $1,148 $1,148 $1,143 $1,143 $1,148 $1,148 $1,158 $1,168 $1,168 $1,168 $1,193 $1,210 $1,210 $1,202 $1,278 $1,279 5.7% 9.5% DuPage $1,263 $1,260 $1,245 $1,228 $1,276 $1,230 $1,278 $1,293 $1,278 $1,309 $1,305 $1,340 $1,374 $1,355 $1,315 $1,385 $1,430 4.1% 11.9% Kane/Kendall $1,058 $1,096 $1,075 $1,102 $1,089 $1,116 $1,184 $1,185 $1,225 $1,250 $1,183 $1,270 $1,363 $1,246 $1,246 $1,288 $1,345 -1.3% 9.8% Lake $1,186 $1,184 $1,206 $1,298 $1,273 $1,308 $1,416 $1,292 $1,441 $1,405 $1,406 $1,420 $1,412 $1,381 $1,396 $1,404 $1,441 2.1% 0.1% McHenry $946 $956 $933 $963 $963 $963 $942 $958 $980 $980 $988 $1,010 $1,003 $990 $995 $1,010 $1,025 2.2% 4.6% Naperville/Aurora $1,310 $1,286 $1,281 $1,325 $1,344 $1,321 $1,330 $1,389 $1,408 $1,407 $1,418 $1,429 $1,445 $1,432 $1,435 $1,479 $1,491 3.2% 5.9% North Shore $2,419 $2,529 $2,466 $2,550 $2,657 $2,405 $2,518 $2,603 $2,625 $2,522 $2,441 $2,603 $2,533 $2,481 $2,446 $2,465 $2,675 5.6% 1.9% Waukegan/Gurnee $930 $918 $938 $968 $988 $1,007 $1,015 $988 $990 $988 $1,003 $1,008 $1,035 $1,040 $1,000 $1,030 $1,063 2.7% 7.4% Will $1,027 $1,029 $1,001 $1,051 $986 $993 $1,034 $1,080 $1,099 $1,155 $1,099 $1,125 $1,116 $1,180 $1,185 $1,200 $1,206 8.1% 9.8% All Suburban $1,200 $1,214 $1,221 $1,225 $1,225 $1,230 $1,261 $1,306 $1,318 $1,321 $1,314 $1,364 $1,368 $1,355 $1,357 $1,400 $1,432 4.7% 8.6% Note: Quarterly net rent values are rounded for display purposes but not for Yr/Yr Change calculations. © 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 32

Occupancy by Submarket

Submarket 2q13 3q13 4q13 1q14 2q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Y/Y Chng 2 Yr Chng Cook NW 96.4 96.1 95.5 95.8 95.5 96.6 95.8 96.9 96.9 97.3 95.1 96.0 97.2 96.0 95.4 94.1 95.2 -2.1% -1.8% Cook South 94.3 93.0 93.8 94.5 94.5 95.3 95.0 95.1 96.4 96.5 95.5 96.1 96.9 96.9 95.9 94.9 95.8 -1.1% -0.6% DuPage 95.7 95.5 95.0 94.8 95.1 95.8 95.3 96.1 96.3 96.6 95.3 96.7 97.2 96.1 95.7 94.4 95.4 -1.8% -0.9% Kane/Kendalll 94.6 93.9 93.8 95.0 94.6 95.2 95.0 96.3 95.7 95.8 96.0 96.7 97.6 96.4 95.2 95.1 96.2 -1.4% 0.5% Lake 96.1 95.1 97.6 97.7 96.3 96.9 96.9 97.7 98.3 98.0 96.6 97.0 97.5 96.9 95.5 95.0 95.5 -2.0% -2.9% McHenry 92.1 96.6 95.4 95.4 95.5 95.3 95.3 96.1 96.4 96.1 95.4 96.2 97.9 96.1 95.6 93.9 95.1 -2.9% -1.3% Naperville/Aurora 97.3 94.6 96.0 95.5 95.8 96.0 96.1 97.1 97.6 96.9 96.0 96.4 97.1 95.1 95.0 94.4 95.6 -1.5% -2.1% North Shore 94.7 96.4 94.1 94.6 91.9 94.8 95.3 96.8 96.4 96.1 94.2 95.4 95.7 95.4 93.8 92.9 94.6 -1.2% -1.9% Waukegan/Gurnee 94.0 96.5 95.5 96.4 95.3 95.4 94.6 95.6 95.8 96.0 95.2 96.5 96.6 96.8 96.9 95.8 96.0 -0.7% 0.2% Will 94.4 94.9 93.5 94.2 95.4 95.4 94.7 95.4 95.6 96.4 94.1 95.4 96.1 96.5 95.5 96.7 96.9 0.8% 1.4% All Suburban 95.6 95.2 95.1 95.4 95.2 95.9 95.3 96.3 96.7 96.7 95.4 96.3 97.1 96.1 95.3 94.5 95.5 -1.6% -1.2% Note: Quarterly occupancy values are rounded for display purposes but not for Yr/Yr Change calculations.

Concessions by Submarket

Submarket 2q13 3q13 4q13 1q14 2q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 Y/Y Chng Cook NW 8.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.0 4.5 5.4 6.1 6.0 2.5 5.9 7.7 6.2 6.3 7.7 5.6 7.7 23.6% Cook South 8.3 4.2 8.3 8.0 8.0 5.9 6.1 5.9 4.8 7.7 5.0 7.7 8.0 7.7 8.0 8.0 7.7 -4.0% DuPage 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 8.3 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 8.0 8.3 7.7 7.7 7.7 6.7 -20.1% Kane/Kendalll 7.7 5.0 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 6.7 7.7 8.3 4.7 -38.4% Lake 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 7.2 7.2 8.3 5.6 2.8 8.0 7.1 7.2 8.3 7.6 7.6 6.2 -13.9% McHenry 8.1 7.7 5.7 8.5 8.3 6.2 5.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! Naperville/Aurora 6.7 4.2 8.7 7.8 8.3 1.7 8.6 4.2 7.5 8.0 5.5 3.5 4.3 6.0 8.3 3.2 6.3 48.3% North Shore 5.2 4.5 6.4 4.8 8.3 8.3 6.0 4.2 8.3 4.7 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.0 7.7 8.3 0.0% Waukegan/Gurnee 8.3 4.3 8.3 8.3 5.6 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 7.3 5.5 8.3 6.0 7.5 8.3 8.3 0.0% Will 4.2 8.3 8.3 6.3 7.0 4.2 6.3 4.2 8.3 8.0 8.3 2.5 5.6 3.7 3.0 7.6 6.3 12.2% All Suburban 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 0.0% Note: Numbers shown are percentages - 1 month free rent on 12 month lease equals 8.3%. © 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 33

Demand Generators

The apartment market is influenced by a number of factors including employment, homeownership trends and a desire to maintain flexibility.

The unemployment rate for the Chicago MSA is 4.9 percent (National, 4.4 percent) as of June 2017. The national unemployment rate for 25+ year olds with a bachelor’s degree has been holding proximate to 2.4 percent.

Chicago vs. National Unemployment Rate – BLS Data

14.0% Chicago National 25+ College 12.0%

10.0%

8.0%

6.0%

4.0%

2.0%

0.0% Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul

Jan 04 Jan 05 Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10 Jan 11 Jan 12 Jan 13 Jan 14 Jan 15 Jan 16 Jan 17 Jan

The Chicago market generated an annual average of 75,000 new jobs from 1992-2000 – a trough to peak period. Employment declined from 2000-2003 with peak post-recession employment achieved in 2007 which did not even match the 2000 employment level. Economy.com forecasts indicate a return to 2000 employment levels will not occur until at least 2020 – 20 years later.

By looking at the month over month comparisons to prior year employment, the trends in employment become more evident. The rate of growth in employment has declined precipitously over the past year.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 34

125 100 75 50 25 0 -25 -50 -75 -100 -125 -150 -175 -200 -225 -250 -275 -300 -325 Jul-09 Jul-10 Jul-16 Jul-17 Jul-07 Jul-08 Jul-11 Jul-12 Jul-13 Jul-14 Jul-15 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17

Chicago MSA Employment - Non Farm (000s) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 4397.8 4411.7 4445.1 4492.2 4529.9 4572.7 4544.3 4547.6 4553.9 4555.2 4570.3 4573.1 2007 4449.3 4447.5 4487.3 4529.2 4577.6 4610.6 4583.9 4584.5 4579.1 4588.4 4603.8 4601.7 2008 4469.7 4467.3 4487.8 4533.2 4572.4 4588.8 4563.2 4558.4 4536.0 4533.5 4511.2 4480.1 2009 4313.0 4291.2 4282.8 4292.0 4317.4 4321.7 4280.8 4267.6 4265.5 4276.7 4278.1 4264.1 2010 4137.3 4146.0 4167.3 4220.2 4274.8 4288.9 4246.1 4255.1 4264.3 4298.8 4311.2 4302.4 2011 4181.1 4190.8 4222.3 4280.6 4313.5 4339.2 4324.0 4332.2 4346.4 4358.4 4372.1 4363.0 2012 4250.0 4261.2 4295.8 4343.1 4385.5 4417.5 4390.6 4403.3 4416.8 4427.2 4446.6 4440.7 2013 4313.5 4334.9 4363.7 4400.3 4456.8 4489.6 4462.5 4477.0 4480.6 4494.1 4511.3 4513.2 2014 4373.4 4387.6 4420.1 4474.2 4531.1 4560.5 4533.6 4541.8 4539.0 4568.6 4580.2 4583.4 2015 4448.2 4464.3 4492.7 4559.6 4618.8 4649.6 4630.1 4629.1 4629.9 4662.4 4668.3 4674.1 2016 4542.4 4551.8 4577.2 4629.7 4664.3 4689.5 4686.1 4685.1 4687.2 4710.1 4705.6 4683.8 2017 4574.2 4585.4 4610.8 4647.0 4701.4 4745.6 4719.2

Revised BLS numbers indicate a deceleration in employment growth as follows:

Employment Change Year Annual Change 2007 37,425 2008 (28,442) 2009 (237,558) 2010 (44,875) 2011 59,267 2012 71,225 2013 68,267 2014 66,333 2015 86,133 2016 57,142

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 35

Homeownership Trends

Rental demand is being driven by instability in the for-sale housing market, the inability to obtain a mortgage due lack of down payment, debt to income ratios (including the impact of student loans) and/or credit issues. Homeownership rates throughout the region had been on a decline through year end 2011 but rose through 2013 – seemingly pointing to a turn in the market. With the Dodd Frank lending rules starting in January 2014, obtaining a loan has become even more difficult due to increased underwriting requirements. Nationally, the rate continues to show a decline but with an upward bump in 3Q16. Each percentage point change equates to roughly 30,000 households in the Chicago MSA.

Homeownership Rate – Chicago MSA

72.0 71.0 70.0 69.0 68.0 67.0 66.0 65.0 64.0 63.0 62.0 61.0 Chicago National 60.0

2Q06 4Q06 2Q07 4Q07 2Q08 4Q08 2Q09 4Q09 2Q10 4Q10 2Q11 4Q11 2Q12 4Q12 2Q13 4Q13 2Q14 4Q14 2Q15 4Q15 2Q16 4Q16 2Q17

The rental market is most heavily influenced by demographic trends in the 25-35 age cohort. This age group is less concerned about owning a home than maintaining flexibility for potential job related moves. The prospect of tying up funds for a down payment on a home and then worrying about the ability to “cash out” for a move in a timely manner (not to mention getting whole relative to the initial purchase) have weighed on the for-sale market. Renting provides options. While price levels of for sale product have been increasing, it has been overall at a modest rate. There has been pressure on interest rates which will motivate some to act on homeownership. There are few compelling reasons to act now on the purchase of a residence.

From a household formation standpoint, there is pent up demand in the 25-34 year old cohort as many in this category remain living with parents.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 36

North Shore Apartment Submarket Overview

Market area defined. The North Shore sub market is defined by Lake Michigan to the east, the city of Chicago on the south, 294 to the west and Lake County to the north. Evanston is the primary rental market.

Survey property profile. The database for the North Shore submarket survey consisted of 4,781 dwelling units. Median unit size for the submarket is 932 square feet which is just below the median for the overall suburban market. The median year built was 2013 compared to the overall suburban market having a median of 1986. While there are numerous rental alternatives in the market for pre- WWII buildings on a much smaller scale, the survey properties represent some of the larger and newer product in the market.

Demand drivers. While some tenants commute daily to the Chicago CBD given the proximity to Metra trains providing access, the employment centers of Evanston, and further north in the office markets along the North Shore, generate significant demand. Evanston’s base of education and medical related employment remains resilient. Kraft announced in July 2015 a move of its corporate headquarters in Northfield to downtown Chicago which could include roughly 1,000 employees. On the other hand, Caterpillar announced in April 2017 it will be relocating its global headquarters from Peoria to Deerfield, affecting roughly 300 employees.

Rent Trends & Concessions. Median net rent per square foot currently stands at $2.40 – up 9.8 percent compared to a year ago. Rents are up 11.3 percent from two years ago. Delivery of new product over the past two years has abated rent pressure on Class A product with gains posted reflective of the 2Q17 performance.

With one bedroom’s having a median rent of $1,922 and two bedroom’s at $2,675, the dichotomy with the rest of the suburban market becomes apparent.

The actual value of the concession (when offered) is at one month free. Concessions will remain in the market as a marketing tool until the added supply gets absorbed.

Occupancy. Occupancy is at 94.6 percent compared to 95.7 percent a year ago. We project occupancy will remain stable in the near term given new supply in the market.

Market Revenue Performance. Market performance is a function of the product of net rent and occupancy.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 37

Market Revenue Performance Net Rent PSF x Occupancy 2.50 (c) 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors 2.30 2.10 1.90 1.70 1.50 MRP Index 1.30 1.10 0.90 2q07 4q07 2q08 4q08 2q09 4q09 2q10 4q10 2q11 4q11 2q12 4q12 2q13 4q13 2q14 2Q17 4Q14 2Q15 4Q15 2Q16 4Q16

Suburban Overall North Shore

The North Shore submarket has outperformed the overall suburban market primarily due to its significantly higher rental rates rather than occupancy trends. A steady trend was apparent in 2011 with growth in 2012 that had deteriorated in part due to new product in the market. Recent rent trends show a flat market given additions to supply with a recent rent spike causing 2Q17 performance to rise.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 38

North Shore Apartments - 2q17 Showing (a) median trend line and (b) middle 2/3rds surveyed (thick bars).

Net Rent PSF - $2.40 Snapshot & Trends

$3.10 North Shore Suburban Metro

$2.60 26 Complexes 316 4,781 Units 96,247 932 SF/unit 906 $2.10 2013 Yr Built 1986 $2.40  Net PSF $1.45  $1.60 94.6%  Occupancy 95.5%  26.9%  Pct W/concessions 20.3%  $1.10 8.3%  Concession Amt 7.7%  $1,922  One Bdrm/Mo $1,209  $0.60 2q15 3q15 4q15 1q16 2q16 3q16 4q16 1q17 2q17 $2,675  Two Bdrm/Mo $1,432 

Median $ 2.16 2.17 2.13 2.18 2.19 2.27 2.22 2.20 2.40

Occupancy - 94.6% Net One Bdrm - $1,922/mo

$3.50$2,300 99% $2,100 $3.00 97% $1,900 $2.50 95% $1,700 $2.00 93% $1,500 $1,300 91% $1.50 $1,100 89% $1.00 $900 $0.50 87% $700 85% $0.00$500 2q15 3q15 4q15 1q16 2q16 3q16 4q16 1q17 2q17 2q152q153q153q154q154q15 1q161q16 2q162q16 3q163q16 4q164q16 1q171q17 2q17

Median % 96.4 96.1 94.2 95.4 95.7 95.4 93.8 92.9 94.6 Median $ 1,776 1,728 1,701 1,754 1,842 1,858 1,828 1,799 1,922

Concessions - 8.3% when offered Net Two Bdrm - $2,675/mo  25% Complexes offering concessions 60% $3.50$3,600

50% $3.00$3,100 20% $2.50 40% $2,600 15% $2.00 30% $2,100 10% $1.50 20% $1,600 $1.00 5% 10% $0.50$1,100

0% 0% $0.00$600 2q15 3q15 4q15 1q16 2q16 3q16 4q16 1q17 2q17 2q152q153q153q154q154q15 1q161q16 2q162q16 3q163q16 4q164q16 1q171q17 2q17

Median % 8.3 4.7 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.0 7.7 8.3 Median $ 2,625 2,522 2,441 2,603 2,533 2,481 2,446 2,465 2,675

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 39

SUBURBAN MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING SUPPLY

Appraisal Research Counselors has been tracking rental apartment construction on an annual basis since 1996. Since that time, there have been over 24,600 units delivered to the suburban market plus an additional 2,400 unit which are currently under construction.

History of Recent Deliveries: 2016-2017

The most recent additions to the suburban market include the following along with the buildings which are currently under construction for 2018 delivery.

© 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors Multi-Family Development - Suburban Chicago Property Submarket City Developer Uni ts Delivered Station Boulevard Aurora - Naperville Aurora Goel/TCCI 417 2016 Metro 59 Aurora - Naperville Aurora Next Gen/Avgeris 232 2016 Northgate Crossing Cook NW Wheeling Reva 300 2016 Wheaton Courthouse Square DuPage Wheaton Focus 149 2016 Elmhurst 255 DuPage Elmhurst Morningside 192 2016 A p e x 41 DuPage Lombard Glenstar 181 2016 Walnut Ridge McHenry Woodstock Cunat 108 2016 Northshore 770 North Shore Northbrook Morningside 347 2016 The Main North Shore Evanston O'Donnell 112 2016 Residences of Orland Park Crossing South Cook Orland Park Reva 231 2016 Vantage Oak Park South Cook Oak Park LSI/Golub/Wood 270 2016 Springs at Weber Will Romeoville Continental Properties 292 2016 2,831

North 680 Cook NW Schaumburg UrbanStreet 192 2017 The Residences at Hamilton Lakes DuPage Itasca M&R/Hamilton 297 2017 Springs at Orchard Rd Kane North Aurora Continental Properties 300 2017 The Residences at Wilmette/611 Green Bay North Shore Wilmette M&R 75 2017 Centrum Evanston/Davis & Maple North Shore Evanston Centrum 101 2017 1620 Central/Central & McGovern North Shore Highland Park Merdinger 73 2017 Uptown LaGrange South Cook LaGrange Opus 254 2017 The Emerson/Colt Site - Lk/Wstgt/Nrth South Cook Oak Park Clark Street/Lennar 271 2017 The Brook on Janes Will Bolingbrook Lennar 280 2017 1,843

Property Submarket City Developer Uni ts Developments Currently Under Construction NWC Laurel & Western North Shore Lake Forest Focus 111 Deer Park Crossing/Field Pkwy Lake Deer Park Reva 236 322 Hough Lake Barrington Monroe Residential 64 Wheeling Town Center/Dundee & Northgate Cook NW Wheeling Urban R2 301 Buckingham Place/Littelfuse site/800 E NW Hwy Cook NW Des Plaines Dearborn-Buckingham 270 Marq on Main/Main St & Burlington DuPage Lisle Marquette 201 Lakeside Village/200 Royce DuPage Oak Brook Terr Interforum 315 Main & Maple DuPage Downers Grove Trammel Crow 115 Burlington Station DuPage Downers Grove Holladay 89 The Atworth at Melody Farms/Milw & Town Ln Lake Vernon Hills Focus 260 SEC Harlem & South Blvd South Cook Oak Park Lincoln 250 Grande Park Apts/SWC 127th & Ridge Will Plainfield Wilmette RE 200 2,412

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 40

While there was a large amount of development activity which occurred in the late 1990s, there has been a surge of new development activity since 2013, with the deliveries in 2016 actually the peak of the market for the past 20 years. However, it should be noted that suburban projects often comprise multiple buildings which are delivered over time, so some of the buildings in the 2016 projects did not actually get completed until 2017.

Deliveries by Submarket Most of the construction that has occurred since 1996 has been in DuPage County – specifically, the Aurora- Naperville submarket. Following is a delivery distribution by submarket for the developments which will have delivered through 2017, excluding the 2018 deliveries.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 41

More recently, the North Shore submarket has seen a large surge of activity. Given the size of the submarket, this has been a substantial increase in the base with absorption in the newer product slowing notably in the latter half of 2015. Concessions are prevalent in the market, although Evanston has continued to outperform the other suburbs in this submarket.

The remaining submarkets have added relatively few units. Of particular note is the small amount of new development activity which has occurred in the Northwest Cook submarket. This market has a high concentration of Class B and C buildings with pent up demand for Class A product.

Current Status - Selected Projects/Sites

We are tracking a number of development sites where new product is being proposed. Locations range from the North Shore markets out to Kane and the South Cook submarkets. A few sites have been approved for development by the local municipalities; however, several projects have not moved forward either due to rents not being high enough to support construction costs or the inability to obtain either the equity or a construction loan. Some projects classified as “confidential” are consulting assignments for which we have been retained but are not yet public.

The proposed projects are typically 150 to 300 units and are fairly widely distributed throughout the region. There are numerous additional sites in the region proposed for multi-family.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 42

Projects in Planning/Pipeline Property Submarket City Developer Uni ts North Shore 601 Davis/NWC Davis & Chicago North Shore Evanston Vermillion 318 1454-1508 Sherman North Shore Evanston Albion 298 831 Emerson North Shore Evanston Focus & CA 242 824 Noyes North Shore Evanston Greg DeStefano 44 Northlight Theatre, 1700 blk Sherman North Shore Evanston Farpoint Devel 152 The Winn/Elm & Lincoln North Shore Winnetka Stonestreet/Trandel 40 1000 Skokie Blvd/Sunset Ridge North Shore Northbrook Finger 304 87 Hundred/8700 Waukegan North Shore Morton Grove Equibase/Heartland 184 Confidential North Shore Confidential TBD 150-200 Confidential North Shore Confidential TBD <100

Lake County Metra/Village Hall site Lake Mundelein Mega Realty 130 The Commons II/Town Center site Lake Vernon Hills Taxman 80 444 Social/SWC Aptakisic & Pkwy/Regal site Lake Lincolnshire ECD/Greenberg 302 Station Square/Trimm Property Lake Libertyville Swanson 92 Former Kmart/225 S Rand Lake Lake Zurich Garden Homes 162

Cook NW Wheeling Station/501 W Dundee Cook NW Wheeling DAC/Atlas 230 Bryn Mawr/Delphia/O'Hare Cook NW/Chicago Chicago TBD 200/194 Marriott/Host site/8535 W Higgins Cook NW/Chicago Chicago Glenstar 299 The Delamore/E of Barrington Rd S of Golf Cook NW Hoffman Estates Vintage Design & Dev 600 Sim's Bowl site/1555-65 Ellinwood Cook NW Des Plaines Opus 108 Covington Lexington Woods/Golf & E River Rd Cook NW Des Plaines Lexington 236 Plum Farms/NWC Rts 59 & 72 Cook NW Hoffman Estates Iatarola/Urban Street 253 NWC Lake & Church Cook NW Hanover Park Monroe Residential 127 Sigwalt St Apts/Sigwalt, Highland, Chestnut Cook NW Arlington Heights CA Ventures 86 Arlington Downs - multiple phases Cook NW Arlington Heights Springbank/Trandel 443 Confidential Cook NW Confidential Confidential 200+/- Confidential Cook NW Confidential Confidential 150

Kane/Kendall Vistas of Mill Creek Kane/Kendall Geneva Shodeen 268 Prairie Centre/St Charles Mall/E of Randall/Rt 38 Kane/Kendall St Charles Shodeen 670 Prairie Winds/NS Bricher W of Randall Rd Kane/Kendall St Charles Big Rock 250 Charlestown Mall site/E of K NS E Main Kane/Kendall St Charles Krausz Companies 256 Watermark at the Grove//WS Randall Kane/Kendall Elgin Interstate Partners 276 Springs at South Elgin/Gyorr Rd & Sterns Kane/Kendall South Elgin Continental Properties 300 Springs at Canterfield/ES Rt 31 N of I-90 Kane/Kendall West Dundee Continental Properties 240 Utopia of East Dundee/NS Main W of Dundee Ave Kane/Kendall East Dundee Oehlerking 64 One Washington Place/NWC Wash. & Wilson Kane/Kendall Batavia Shodeen 186 Former Alexander Lumber/Washington&Adams Kane/Kendall Oswego Shodeen TBD Randall Oaks/WS Randall N of Randall Comm Kane/Kendall North Aurora Shodeen 261

McHenry County Rt 14 near Illinois McHenry Fox River Grove Gart Partners 300

DuPage County Woodmoor on Finley Road/frmr Ken-Loch DuPage Uninc/Lombard Donven Homes 388 Yorktown DuPage Lombard AIMCO 78 McChesney & Miller site DuPage Glen Ellyn Springbank/Trandel 245 Giesche site/400 N Main DuPage Glen Ellyn TBD 110 NWC Addison & First DuPage Elmhurst Opus 164 Oak Brook Hilton site DuPage Westmont Harp Group 250 Downers Grove Civic Center site DuPage Downers Grove Next Gen 234 Yorktown Commons DuPage Lombard Continuum 295

South Cook County NWC Lake & Forest South Cook Oak Park Albion 265

Will County Highlands of Lockport/143rd & 355 Will Lockport Equibase/Heartland 248 Lincoln Station/NS Rt 30 at Prairie & RR Will New Lenox Gammonly/TBD 208 Normantown E of Brunswick Will Romeoville Rose/S.R. Jacobsen 216 Highpoint Town Square Will Romeoville HPTS 72

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 43

Conclusions

We are aware of several additional projects being planned throughout the metro area, focused on transit oriented development in downtown markets. Projects are generally under 250 units but face significant challenges for necessary rental rates for feasibility along with financing.

With an average delivery of roughly 1,175 units per year in the suburban market since 1996, the addition to overall supply has been minimal for the suburbs comprising the Chicago Metropolitan Area. While certain submarkets are adequately supplied with rental units at this time, we believe opportunities exist to create additional rental product. The diverse employment base for the MSA and our direct surveys of buildings in the market indicates a strong long term picture for multi-family rental product.

Difficulties remain however in securing large enough sites suitable for development and obtaining the necessary zoning approvals in light of general community opposition to rental development. As shown, these factors are contributing to a shift in development to more high density sites – potentially in redeveloping downtown markets as transit oriented developments. The costs of construction remain high ($250+/- psf) for these mid-rise structures (concrete construction) and while demand may certainly exist, the feasible rent levels will be catering to the upper end of the market. While adding supply of substance appears improbable at this point in the MSA overall, we note a significant increase in activity.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 44

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS – EVANSTON

In researching the demographics of the target market area, we have provided Environics Analytics data from the Nielsen Company for the demographics of the residents located within the city of Evanston.

We fully recognize that while the demographics provide insights into the existing population, demand for the subject units will come from both the immediate market area and from outside this market area. Discussions with leasing agents and the apartment project managers in the primary market area indicate a diverse renter profile with residents coming from outside the area to attend Northwestern University, relocating for job-related reasons, along with a more local base of residents (i.e. empty nesters downsizing). Thus, the existing residents in the region will provide a segment of the market demand, but we also expect that the subject property will attract renters currently located outside the market area.

Boundary Map

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 45

Evanston, IL Count % Population 2000 Census 74,260 2010 Census 74,486 2017 Estimate 76,187 2022 Projection 77,147

Population Growth Percent Change: 2000 to 2010 0.30 0.30 Percent Change: 2010 to 2017 2.28 2.28 Percent Change: 2017 to 2022 1.26 1.26

2017 Est. Population by Sex Male 36,426 47.81 Female 39,761 52.19

2017 Est. Population by Age Age 0 - 4 4,056 5.32 Age 5 - 9 4,192 5.50 Age 10 - 14 4,130 5.42 Age 15 - 17 2,523 3.31 Age 18 - 20 6,023 7.91 Age 21 - 24 5,672 7.45 Age 25 - 34 10,578 13.88 Age 35 - 44 9,871 12.96 Age 45 - 54 9,279 12.18 Age 55 - 64 8,868 11.64 Age 65 - 74 6,107 8.02 Age 75 - 84 2,972 3.90 Age 85 and over 1,916 2.52 Age 16 and over 62,997 82.69 Age 18 and over 61,286 80.44 Age 21 and over 55,263 72.54 Age 65 and over 10,995 14.43

Median Age -- 35.90 Average Age -- 38.40

Households 2000 Census 29,664 2010 Census 30,047 2017 Estimate 31,430 2022 Projection 32,195

Household Growth Percent Change: 2000 to 2010 1.29 Percent Change: 2010 to 2017 4.60 Percent Change: 2017 to 2022 2.43

Households by Household Income Income Less Than $15,000 3,831 12.19 Income $15,000 - $24,999 2,378 7.57 Income $25,000 - $34,999 2,231 7.10 Income $35,000 - $49,999 3,408 10.84 Income $50,000 - $74,999 4,450 14.16 Income $75,000 - $99,999 3,291 10.47 Income $100,000 - $124,999 2,633 8.38 Income $125,000 - $149,999 2,089 6.65 Income $150,000 - $199,999 2,553 8.12 Income $200,000 - $249,999 1,400 4.45 Income $250,000 - $499,999 2,072 6.59 Income $500,000 or more 1,094 3.48

Source: Environics Analytics

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 46

Evanston, IL Count % Average Household Income -- 112,108.00 Median Household Income -- 71,277.30

2017 Est. Households by Household Size 1-Person Household 12,216 38.87 2-Person Household 9,586 30.50 3-Person Household 4,276 13.61 4-Person Household 3,233 10.29 5-Person Household 1,370 4.36 6-Person Household 451 1.44 7-or-more-person 298 0.95

2017 Est. Average Household Size -- 2.20

2017 Est. Households by Number of Vehicles No Vehicles 5,211 16.58 1 Vehicle 15,107 48.07 2 Vehicles 9,522 30.30 3 Vehicles 1,280 4.07 4 Vehicles 190 0.60 5 or more Vehicles 120 0.38

2017 Est. Average Number of Vehicles -- 1.30

2017 Est. Workers Age 16+ by Transp. to Work 2017 Est. Workers Age 16+ by Transp. to Work 36,112 100.00 Drove Alone 16,912 46.83 Carpooled 1,989 5.51 Public Transport 8,238 22.81 Walked 4,366 12.09 Bicycle 1,286 3.56 Other Means 337 0.93 Worked at Home 2,984 8.26

2017 Est. Workers Age 16+by Travel Time to Work Less than 15 Minutes 7,952 12.62 15 - 29 Minutes 8,933 14.18 30 - 44 Minutes 6,642 10.54 45 - 59 Minutes 5,421 8.61 60 or more Minutes 4,267 6.77 2017 Est. Avg Travel Time to Work in Minutes -- 34.00

2017 Est. Occupied Housing Units by Tenure Housing Units, Owner-Occupied 17,262 54.92 Housing Units, Renter-Occupied 14,168 45.08

2017 Owner Occ. HUs: Avg. Length of Residence 2017 Owner Occ. HUs: Avg. Length of Residence -- 16.20

2017 Renter Occ. HUs: Avg. Length of Residence 2017 Renter Occ. HUs: Avg. Length of Residence -- 6.20 Source: Environics Analytics

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 47

2017 Household Income by Age of Householder Evanston, IL

Age 15-24 % Age 25-34 % Age 35-44 % Age 45-54 % Age 55-64 % Age 65-74 % Age 75-84 % Age 85+ % 2000 Household Totals Household Totals 2,262 7.63 6,815 22.97 6,223 20.98 5,585 18.83 3,632 12.24 2,402 8.10 1,924 6.49 821 2.77 2000 Census Age/Income Income Less than $15,000 1,045 3.52 699 2.36 387 1.30 338 1.14 304 1.02 303 1.02 482 1.63 173 0.58 Income $15,000 - $24,999 365 1.23 614 2.07 414 1.40 314 1.06 225 0.76 312 1.05 362 1.22 103 0.35 Income $25,000 - $34,999 200 0.67 656 2.21 502 1.69 406 1.37 210 0.71 268 0.90 293 0.99 70 0.24 Income $35,000 - $49,999 215 0.72 1,100 3.71 976 3.29 700 2.36 500 1.69 419 1.41 229 0.77 50 0.17 Income $50,000 - $74,999 166 0.56 1,552 5.23 1,263 4.26 942 3.18 672 2.27 352 1.19 312 1.05 70 0.24 Income $75,000 - $99,999 93 0.31 832 2.81 787 2.65 747 2.52 493 1.66 263 0.89 170 0.57 33 0.11 Income $100,000 - $124,999 18 0.06 470 1.58 706 2.38 623 2.10 321 1.08 180 0.61 138 0.47 23 0.08 Income $125,000 - $149,999 0 0.00 346 1.17 368 1.24 350 1.18 252 0.85 107 0.36 88 0.30 26 0.09 Income $150,000 - $199,999 22 0.07 319 1.07 271 0.91 536 1.81 320 1.08 77 0.26 35 0.12 8 0.03 Income $200,000 or more 4 0.01 161 0.54 586 1.98 676 2.28 351 1.18 187 0.63 118 0.40 21 0.07 Median HH Income -- 15,399.15 -- 54,366.76 -- 65,764.69 -- 78,532.41 -- 71,332.99 -- 47,279.43 -- 34,047.69 -- 26,497.31 2017 Household Totals Household Totals 1,924 6.12 5,309 16.89 5,668 18.03 5,585 17.77 5,572 17.73 4,077 12.97 2,034 6.47 1,261 4.01 2017 Estimate Age/Income Income Less than $15,000 1,059 3.37 796 2.53 399 1.27 321 1.02 455 1.45 282 0.90 288 0.92 231 0.73 Income $15,000 - $24,999 208 0.66 535 1.70 335 1.07 252 0.80 352 1.12 237 0.75 255 0.81 204 0.65 Income $25,000 - $34,999 216 0.69 421 1.34 291 0.93 283 0.90 358 1.14 250 0.80 227 0.72 185 0.59 Income $35,000 - $49,999 233 0.74 761 2.42 588 1.87 455 1.45 516 1.64 423 1.35 281 0.89 151 0.48 Income $50,000 - $74,999 153 0.49 915 2.91 839 2.67 660 2.10 704 2.24 699 2.22 305 0.97 175 0.56 Income $75,000 - $99,999 27 0.09 567 1.80 600 1.91 691 2.20 651 2.07 464 1.48 185 0.59 106 0.34 Income $100,000 - $124,999 15 0.05 424 1.35 562 1.79 539 1.72 475 1.51 412 1.31 118 0.38 88 0.28 Income $125,000 - $149,999 6 0.02 296 0.94 427 1.36 496 1.58 441 1.40 291 0.93 87 0.28 45 0.14 Income $150,000 - $199,999 4 0.01 260 0.83 585 1.86 598 1.90 515 1.64 427 1.36 126 0.40 38 0.12 Income $200,000 or more 3 0.01 334 1.06 1,042 3.31 1,290 4.10 1,105 3.52 592 1.88 162 0.52 38 0.12 Median HH Income -- 13,054.99 -- 53,235.73 -- 90,348.66 -- 105,593.64 -- 89,810.13 -- 82,056.44 -- 47,955.84 -- 35,774.93 2022 Household Totals Household Totals 1,836 5.70 4,695 14.58 5,882 18.27 5,783 17.96 5,504 17.10 4,771 14.82 2,446 7.60 1,278 3.97 2022 Projection Age/Income Income Less than $15,000 974 3.02 712 2.21 434 1.35 299 0.93 404 1.25 298 0.93 332 1.03 228 0.71 Income $15,000 - $24,999 193 0.60 430 1.34 330 1.02 235 0.73 316 0.98 265 0.82 297 0.92 201 0.62 Income $25,000 - $34,999 190 0.59 360 1.12 272 0.84 253 0.79 324 1.01 285 0.89 255 0.79 188 0.58 Income $35,000 - $49,999 218 0.68 640 1.99 588 1.83 433 1.34 483 1.50 457 1.42 325 1.01 143 0.44 Income $50,000 - $74,999 182 0.56 780 2.42 844 2.62 632 1.96 700 2.17 805 2.50 378 1.17 179 0.56 Income $75,000 - $99,999 36 0.11 483 1.50 607 1.89 695 2.16 635 1.97 525 1.63 204 0.63 103 0.32 Income $100,000 - $124,999 17 0.05 376 1.17 582 1.81 543 1.69 468 1.45 485 1.51 148 0.46 91 0.28 Income $125,000 - $149,999 15 0.05 278 0.86 435 1.35 521 1.62 453 1.41 361 1.12 117 0.36 60 0.19 Income $150,000 - $199,999 7 0.02 257 0.80 598 1.86 649 2.02 517 1.61 507 1.57 164 0.51 41 0.13 Income $200,000 or more 4 0.01 379 1.18 1,192 3.70 1,523 4.73 1,204 3.74 783 2.43 226 0.70 44 0.14 Median HH Income -- 13,742.81 -- 55,647.13 -- 94,147.81 -- 115,467.99 -- 95,250.34 -- 87,202.98 -- 50,740.77 -- 36,707.72 Source: Environics Analytics

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 48

There is also a large component of small households in the area, which is the target market for multi- family housing: • Single person households comprise 38.87% of the households in Evanston. • Two person households comprise 30.50% of the households in this same defined market area. • Thus, the one and two person households comprise 69.37 % of the households in this market area.

As already discussed, the drawing area for the project will actually be much wider than these geographic boundaries, as additional renters will also be drawn from outside the area due to Northwestern University student/staff, job relocations, or older parents moving to be closer to their children and grandchildren.

Qualifying Income

Our recommendations for the subject units result in average monthly rents as shown below, along with the minimum income to qualify, utilizing both 30% and 35% rent/income ratios:

S tudio Conv 1BR 2BR 3BR Monthly Rent $1,800 $2,000 $2,200 $3,200 $4,500 12 months 12 12 12 12 12 Annual Rent $21,600 $24,000 $26,400 $38,400 $54,000 Rent/Income Ratio 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Minimum Income $72,000 $80,000 $88,000 $128,000 $180,000

S tudio Conv 1BR 2BR 3BR Monthly Rent $1,800 $2,000 $2,200 $3,200 $4,500 12 months 12 12 12 12 12 Annual Rent $21,600 $24,000 $26,400 $38,400 $54,000 Rent/Income Ratio 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Minimum Income $61,714 $68,571 $75,429 $109,714 $154,286

In Evanston, the average household income is $112,108 with a median household income of $71,277. While these income levels are generally in line with the proposed development, it is more likely that the building will attract a significant student/grad student tenant profile who will not already reside in the area along with empty nesters who will be moving from other affluent north suburban communities in addition to Evanston.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 49

RENTAL COMPETITION SURVEY

In this section of the report, we have included a survey of the competitive rental apartment units located in the Evanston market. Due to the quantity and quality of this data, it was not necessary or particularly relevant to go outside the community for additional alternatives.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 50

Existing Competition Map

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 51

Existing Competition Overview

© 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors, All Rights Reserved Total Date Avg Size Quoted Effective Monthly Name Address Suburb Submarket Units Built (SF) Rent PSF Rent PSF Occup. Parking Subject 601-605 Davis Evanston Downtown 318 Proposed 855

1717 1717 Ridge Evanston Downtown 175 2013 835 $2.81 $2.81 98.30% $140-$250 Centrum Evanston 1590 Elmwood Evanston Downtown 101 2017 910 $3.00 $3.00 in lease-up $85 off site E2 1890 Maple Evanston Downtown 356 2015 799 $3.24 $3.24 94.90% $145-$195 Evanston Place 1715-1735 Chicago Ave Evanston Downtown 190 1991 864 $2.88 $2.88 96.84% $90 Park Evanston 1630 Chicago Avenue Evanston Downtown 283 1997 923 $2.67 $2.67 98.90% $115-$135 The Reserve at Evanston 1930 Ridge Avenue Evanston Downtown 193 2003 839 $2.32 $2.32 98.40% $140

1620 Central 1620 Central Evanston North of DT 47 2017 1,105 $2.42 $2.42 in lease-up $160 Central Station Apts. 1720 Central Street Evanston North of DT 80 2013 965 $2.63 $2.41 92.50% $160 Residences of Wilmette 617 Green Bay Road Wilmette North of DT 75 2017 1,013 $2.98 $2.98 in lease-up $160-$180

AMLI at Evanston 737 Chicago Avenue Evanston South of DT 195 2013 1,042 $2.31 $2.31 91.80% $135 The Main 847 Chicago Evanston South of DT 112 2016 889 $2.70 $2.48 in lease-up $165-$215 Total 1807

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 52

Unit Mix (Number of Units)

Number of Units Name Address Suburb Submarket St/Conv. 1BR 1BR+Den 2BR 2BR+Den 3BR Total Subject 601-605 Davis Evanston Downtown 110 84 98 26 318

1717 1717 Ridge Evanston Downtown 14 101 4 42 14 175 Centrum Evanston 1590 Elmwood Evanston Downtown 21 36 38 6 101 E2 1890 Maple Evanston Downtown 48 204 81 23 356 Evanston Place 1715-1735 Chicago Ave Evanston Downtown 16 94 32 24 22 2 190 Park Evanston 1630 Chicago Avenue Evanston Downtown 28 115 19 106 15 283 The Reserve at Evanston 1930 Ridge Avenue Evanston Downtown 7 101 77 8 193

1620 Central 1620 Central Evanston North of DT 11 28 8 47 Central Station Apts. 1720 Central Street Evanston North of DT 8 32 12 18 6 4 80 Residences of Wilmette 617 Green Bay Road Wilmette North of DT 4 29 4 32 6 75

AMLI at Evanston 737 Chicago Avenue Evanston South of DT 5 134 44 12 195 The Main 847 Chicago Evanston South of DT 14 49 42 7 112 Total 165 906 71 532 28 105 1,807

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 53

Unit Mix (% of Total) © 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors, All Rights Reserved Unit Mix Name Address Suburb Submarket St/Conv. 1BR 1BR+Den 2BR 2BR+Den 3BR Subject 601-605 Davis Evanston Downtown 34.59% 26.42% 30.82% 8.18%

1717 1717 Ridge Evanston Downtown 8.00% 57.70% 2.30% 24.00% 8.00% Centrum Evanston 1590 Elmwood Evanston Downtown 20.80% 35.60% 37.60% 5.90% E2 1890 Maple Evanston Downtown 13.50% 57.30% 22.80% 6.50% Evanston Place 1715-1735 Chicago Ave Evanston Downtown 8.42% 49.47% 16.84% 12.63% 11.58% 1.05% Park Evanston 1630 Chicago Avenue Evanston Downtown 9.90% 40.60% 6.70% 37.50% 5.30% The Reserve at Evanston 1930 Ridge Avenue Evanston Downtown 3.60% 52.30% 39.90% 4.10%

1620 Central 1620 Central Evanston North of DT 20.00% 62.20% 17.80% Central Station Apts. 1720 Central Street Evanston North of DT 10.00% 40.00% 15% 22.50% 7.50% 5.00% Residences of Wilmette 617 Green Bay Road Wilmette North of DT 5.30% 38.70% 5% 42.70% 8.00%

AMLI at Evanston 737 Chicago Avenue Evanston South of DT 2.60% 68.70% 22.60% 6.20% The Main 847 Chicago Evanston South of DT 12.50% 43.80% 37.50% 6.30% Total 9.13% 50.14% 3.93% 29.44% 1.55% 5.81%

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 54

Unit Sizes (Square Footage)

© 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors, All Rights Reserved Unit Sizes (SF Range) Name Address Suburb Submarket St/Conv 1BR 1BR+Den 2BR 2BR+Den 3BR Subject 601-605 Davis Evanston Downtown 505 - 540 710 - 750 1,050 - 1,245 1,490 - 1,515

1717 1717 Ridge Evanston Downtown 518 - 535 564 - 836 933 988 - 1,203 1,239 - 1,367 Centrum Evanston 1590 Elmwood Evanston Downtown 622 - 648 566 - 868 986 - 1,278 1,395 - 1,869 E2 1890 Maple Evanston Downtown 505 - 542 594 - 805 934 - 1,097 1,298 - 1,751 Evanston Place 1715-1735 Chicago Ave Evanston Downtown 567 657 - 852 878 - 958 966 - 1,034 1,216 - 1,221 1,968 Park Evanston 1630 Chicago Avenue Evanston Downtown 514 - 540 589 - 800 1,049 - 1,094 1,017 - 1,315 1,434 - 1,575 The Reserve at Evanston 1930 Ridge Avenue Evanston Downtown 550 545 575 780 870 1,110 1,205 1,445

1620 Central 1620 Central Evanston North of DT 601 - 816 1,099 - 1,299 1,185 - 1,262 Central Station Apts. 1720 Central Street Evanston North of DT 590 - 635 785 - 850 885 1,185 - 1,230 1,305 1,485 Residences of Wilmette 617 Green Bay Road Wilmette North of DT 657 740 - 789 882 1,114 - 1,291 1,510 - 1,554

AMLI at Evanston 737 Chicago Avenue Evanston South of DT 500 - 633 632 - 1,237 1,000 - 1,590 1,462 - 1,557 The Main 847 Chicago Evanston South of DT 500 - 650 746 - 853 912 - 1,068 1,424 - 1,424

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 55

Existing Primary Competition

Eleven properties with approximately 1,800 units were identified as providing potential competition to the subject units. These developments are all located in Evanston, extending from Central Street on the north to Main Street on the south, with one additional property which is located in downtown Wilmette and beginning occupancy in the fall of 2017. Nine of the 11 properties were developed post-2000 while two were developed in the 1990s. The average unit sizes range from 799 to 1,105 SF, with several of the buildings having an overall average unit size which is similar to the subject property. These projects also range in size from approximately 50 to 350 units, with the subject building containing more units than 10 of the 11 buildings.

Evanston has experienced a large amount of new rental apartment development activity in the past five years, as evidenced by the fact that 8 of the 11 properties comprising competition have been built since 2013. While there were over 2,000 new unit deliveries in the overall suburban market during 2013, 450 of these units were located in Evanston alone, with one in downtown (1717), one on Central Street in north Evanston (Central Station) and one in the Chicago and Main/south Evanston corridor (Amli Evanston). Again in 2015, 356 units were delivered in the E2 building, with 112 delivered at the Main in 2016 and two buildings delivered in 2017 (Centrum Evanston and 1620 Central).

Evanston also has a major demand generator – Northwestern University. This provides strong demand for housing by faculty, staff, graduate students, and even undergraduate students. Because of the presence of the university, Evanston is able to command the highest rents in the suburban region. Additionally, Evanston is also able to attract young professionals who are employed in the suburbs, as it is situated on the edge of Chicago, has a less suburban and more “youthful” image, and offers good accessibility and proximity to the city. Evanston is also a very appealing location to many empty-nesters who want to remain on the North Shore but downsize into smaller rental apartments, with Evanston providing an interesting mix of restaurants, retail, and cultural amenities. It also provides access to both the Metra and CTA trains within walking distance of all of these properties. While the student and younger demographics are attracted more to a downtown Evanston location, the empty nester demographic may consider other non-downtown Evanston locations including Central Street and Main Street, along with downtown Wilmette where the Residences of Wilmette is completing construction.

The new and existing Class A buildings in the Evanston market are currently commanding rents ranging from approximately $2.31 PSF outside of the Downtown area to $3.24 PSF in Downtown Evanston. These downtown premiums are representative of how desirable renters find the downtown Evanston market.

Clearly, full amenity buildings situated in downtown Evanston are able to command rent premiums in the market. Evanston Place and the Park Evanston, both developed in the 1990s, are commanding rents averaging between $2.67 and $2.84 PSF for buildings which are now 20 to 25 years old. While Evanston Place has undergone some renovations, the Park Evanston still offers the original laminate kitchen finishes which are now considered quite dated by renters in this market. Thus, the excellent location of these two properties is reflected in its strong rent levels.

The two newer downtown buildings are Centrum Evanston and E2 which are renting between $3.00 to $3.24 PSF. Centrum Evanston is the newest addition to the Downtown Evanston market, starting

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 56

occupancy in late August 2017 in time for the academic year. Its lobby and common area spaces appear to be more oriented towards a student/grad student tenant profile while the subject property will be more luxurious and targeted to a broader mix of residents, including empty nesters. E2 clearly represents the top of the rental market at the present time in downtown Evanston and has an amenity package which surpasses all of the competition. With amenities including an indoor basketball court, its rents are at the top of the market.

The one downtown building which appears to be lagging the market is the 193-unit Reserve which was constructed in 2003. It consists of a series of 4-story buildings located along the Metra tracks. The unit finishes are more dated, lacking amenities like stainless steel appliances although the units are very nice and the complex has good amenities (fitness center and outdoor swimming pool).

Parking rates were also surveyed and ranged from $90 to $180 for standard spaces, with Centrum Evanston reporting $85 per space for off-site parking, requiring a one block walk to the Sherman Plaza parking garage.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 57

Competition –Proposed for Development or Under Construction

In addition to the existing competition, Evanston has an active pipeline of new projects including the subject property.

Evanston Pipeline

Property City Developer Status Uni ts 601 Davis Evanston Vermillion Planning 318 1450-1508 Sherman Evanston Albion Planning 287 831 Emerson Evanston Focus & CA Approved 242 824 Noyes Evanston Greg DeStefano Approved 44 Total 891

831 Emerson Unit Type No. Units % Avg SF Studio 71 29% 390 1BR 40 17% 575 2BR 93 38% 815 3BR 38 16% 1,153 Total/Avg 242 100% 704

831 Emerson, a joint venture between CA and Focus Development was approved in June 2017 for 242 units along with 3,300 SF of retail space and 174 parking spaces (.72:1 parking ratio). It is anticipated that this project will be oriented towards students given its small unit sizes and location close to Northwestern University.

1450-1508 Sherman Unit Type No. Units % Avg SF Studio 95 34% 430-515 Convertible 64 22% 625 1BR 35 12% 700 1BR+Den 33 12% 800 2BR/2 57 20% 975-1,200 3BR 2 1% 1,400 Total/Avg 286 100% 728

Albion is currently in the entitlement process for a 287 unit rental apartment development at 1450- 1508 Sherman. In addition to the 286 units, the project is proposed to include 9,321 SF of commercial space and 186 parking spaces.

824 Noyes has been approved for development and is starting construction for a 4-story mixed-use building with 44 apartments and 3,200 SF of retail space. The building will consist of 11 studio units, 12 one bedroom units, 12 two bedroom units and 9 three bedroom units along with 35 parking spaces (.80:1 parking ratio). Although located north of Downtown, this property is situated adjacent to a CTA station and is in walking distance of Northwestern University.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 58

Rent Summary

On the following pages are the following:

• Summary of the primary competition with our rent conclusions for the subject units shown in red) • Individual project summary pages for the primary competition

Studio Units

Quoted Rent Net Effective Rent Unit Description U nits Pct Sq Ft Rent PSF Avg Concession Rent PSF Avg 1717 Studio 14 8.0% 518 $1,590 $3.07 $3.07 0.0% $1,590 $3.07 $3.07 1.0 Bath 535 $1,640 $3.07 $1,640 $3.07

AMLI at Evanston Studio 5 2.6% 500 $1,735 $3.47 $3.11 0.0% $1,735 $3.47 $3.11 1.0 Bath 633 $1,735 $2.74 $1,735 $2.74 E2 Studio 48 13.5% 505 $1,825 $3.61 $3.52 0.0% $1,825 $3.61 $3.52 1.0 Bath 542 $1,860 $3.43 $1,860 $3.43

Evanston Place Studio 16 8.4% 567 $1,800 $3.17 $3.17 0.0% $1,800 $3.17 $3.17 1.0 Bath 567 $1,800 $3.17 $1,800 $3.17 Park Evanston Studio 28 9.9% 514 $1,715 $3.34 $3.42 0.0% $1,715 $3.34 $3.42 1.0 Bath 540 $1,890 $3.50 $1,890 $3.50 The Main Studio 14 12.5% 500 $1,545 $3.09 $2.96 8.3% $1,416 $2.83 $2.71 1.0 Bath 650 $1,840 $2.83 $1,687 $2.59 The Reserve at Evanston Studio 7 3.6% 550 $1,493 $2.71 $2.68 0.0% $1,493 $2.71 $2.68 1.0 Bath 645 $1,700 $2.64 $1,700 $2.64

Total/Weighted Avgs 132 541 $1,772 $3.28 $1,757 $3.25

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 59

Studio Avg Net Effec Rent $1,900 $1,850 $1,800 $1,750 $1,700 $1,650 $1,600 $1,550 $1,500 $1,450 $1,400 E2 Park Evanston Subject Amli 1717 The The Main Evanston Place Reserve

Studio Avg Net Effec Rent & Unit SF $1,900 $1,850 $1,800 $1,750 $1,700 $1,650 $1,600 $1,550 $1,500 $1,450 $1,400 500 520 540 560 580 600 620

Studio Avg Net Effec Rent PSF & Unit SF

$3.75

$3.50

$3.25

$3.00

$2.75

$2.50

$2.25 500 520 540 560 580 600 620

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 60

Convertible Units

Quoted Rent Net Effective Rent Unit Description U nits Pct Sq Ft Rent PSF Avg Concession Rent PSF Avg Central Station Apartments Convertible 8 10.0% 590 $1,815 $3.08 $3.02 8.3% $1,664 $2.82 $2.77 1.0 Bath 635 $1,887 $2.97 $1,730 $2.72 Centrum Evanston Convertible 21 20.8% 622 $1,775 $2.85 $3.16 0.0% $1,775 $2.85 $3.16 1.0 Bath 648 $2,250 $3.47 $2,250 $3.47

Residences of Wilmette Studio 4 5.3% 657 $2,100 $3.20 $3.20 0.0% $2,100 $3.20 $3.20 1.0 Bath 657 $2,100 $3.20 $2,100 $3.20

Total/Weighted Avgs 33 632 $1,984 $3.14 $1,947 $3.08

*While the Residences at Wilmette classify their unit as a studio, it has a layout comparable to the convertibles in this survey.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 61

Convertible Avg Net Effec Rent

$2,200 $2,100

$2,000

$1,900

$1,800

$1,700

$1,600

$1,500 Residences of Centrum Evanston Subject Central Station Wilmette

Conv Avg Net Effec Rent & Unit SF

$2,200

$2,100

$2,000

$1,900

$1,800

$1,700

$1,600

$1,500

$1,400 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675

Conv Avg Net Effec Rent PSF & Unit SF

$4.00 $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 62

One Bedroom Units

Quoted Rent Net Effective Rent Unit Description U nits Pct Sq Ft Rent PSF Avg Concession Rent PSF Avg 1620 Central Street One Bedroom 9 20.0% 601 $1,297 $2.16 $2.35 0.0% $1,297 $2.16 $2.35 1.0 Bath 816 $2,072 $2.54 $2,072 $2.54 1717 One Bedroom 101 57.7% 564 $1,775 $3.15 $3.04 0.0% $1,775 $3.15 $3.04 1.0 Bath 836 $2,450 $2.93 $2,450 $2.93 AMLI at Evanston One Bedroom 134 68.7% 632 $1,840 $2.91 $2.47 0.0% $1,840 $2.91 $2.47 1.0 Bath 1,237 $2,521 $2.04 $2,521 $2.04 Central Station Apartments One Bedroom 32 40.0% 785 $1,943 $2.48 $2.55 8.3% $1,781 $2.27 $2.34 1.0 Bath 850 $2,231 $2.62 $2,045 $2.41 Centrum Evanston One Bedroom 36 35.6% 566 $1,925 $3.40 $3.24 0.0% $1,925 $3.40 $3.24 1.0 Bath 868 $2,675 $3.08 $2,675 $3.08 E2 One Bedroom 204 57.3% 594 $1,845 $3.11 $3.18 0.0% $1,845 $3.11 $3.18 1.0 Bath 805 $2,615 $3.25 $2,615 $3.25 Evanston Place One Bedroom 86 45.3% 657 $1,830 $2.79 $2.66 0.0% $1,830 $2.79 $2.66 1.0 Bath 835 $2,120 $2.54 $2,120 $2.54

Evanston Place One Bedroom 8 4.2% 852 $2,275 $2.67 $2.67 0.0% $2,275 $2.67 $2.67 1.5 Bath 852 $2,275 $2.67 $2,275 $2.67

Park Evanston One Bedroom 115 40.6% 589 $1,915 $3.25 $3.09 0.0% $1,915 $3.25 $3.09 1.0 Bath 800 $2,338 $2.92 $2,338 $2.92 The Main One Bedroom 35 31.3% 746 $2,020 $2.71 $2.71 8.3% $1,852 $2.48 $2.48 1.0 Bath 853 $2,315 $2.71 $2,122 $2.49 The Main One Bedroom 14 12.5% 853 $2,185 $2.56 $2.59 8.3% $2,003 $2.35 $2.37 1.0 Bath 853 $2,235 $2.62 $2,049 $2.40 The Reserve at Evanston One Bedroom 101 52.3% 575 $1,775 $3.09 $2.88 0.0% $1,775 $3.09 $2.88 1.0 Bath 780 $2,087 $2.68 $2,087 $2.68

The Residences of Wilmette One Bedroom 29 38.7% 740 $2,440 $3.30 $3.14 0.0% $2,440 $3.30 $3.14 1.0 Bath 789 $2,350 $2.98 $2,350 $2.98

Total/Weighted Avgs 904 750 $2,134 $2.84 $2,118 $2.82

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 63

1BR Avg Net Effec Rent $2,500 $2,400 $2,300 $2,200 $2,100 $2,000 $1,900 $1,800 $1,700 $1,600 $1,500

1BR Avg Net Effec Rent & Unit SF $2,500 $2,400 $2,300 $2,200 $2,100 $2,000 $1,900 $1,800 $1,700 $1,600 $1,500 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000

1BR Avg Net Effec Rent PSF & Unit SF $3.50

$3.25

$3.00

$2.75

$2.50

$2.25

$2.00 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 64

One Bedroom Plus Den Units

Quoted Rent Net Effective Rent Unit Description U nits Pct Sq Ft Rent PSF Avg Concession Rent PSF Avg 1717 One Bedroom + Den 4 2.3% 933 $2,363 $2.53 $2.53 0.0% $2,363 $2.53 $2.53 1.0 Bath 933 $2,363 $2.53 $2,363 $2.53 Central Station Apartments One Bedroom + Den 12 15.0% 885 $2,384 $2.69 $2.72 8.3% $2,185 $2.47 $2.50 1.0 Bath 885 $2,434 $2.75 $2,231 $2.52

Evanston Place One Bedroom + Den 16 8.4% 878 $2,925 $3.33 $3.33 0.0% $2,925 $3.33 $3.33 1.0 Bath 878 $2,925 $3.33 $2,925 $3.33 Evanston Place One Bedroom + Den 16 8.4% 958 $2,870 $3.00 $3.00 0.0% $2,870 $3.00 $3.00 1.5 Bath 958 $2,870 $3.00 $2,870 $3.00 Park Evanston One Bedroom + Den 19 6.7% 1,049 $2,655 $2.53 $2.64 0.0% $2,655 $2.53 $2.64 1.5 Bath 1,094 $2,998 $2.74 $2,998 $2.74

The Residences of Wilmette One Bedroom + Den 4 5.3% 882 $2,545 $2.89 $2.89 0.0% $2,545 $2.89 $2.89 1.0 Bath 882 $2,545 $2.89 $2,545 $2.89

Total/Weighted Avgs 71 952 $2,746 $2.88 $2,712 $2.85

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 65

Two Bedroom Units

Quoted Rent Net Effective Rent Unit Description U nits Pct Sq Ft Rent PSF Avg Concession Rent PSF Avg 1620 Central Street Two Bedroom 28 62.2% 1,099 $2,637 $2.40 $2.37 0.0% $2,637 $2.40 $2.37 2.0 Bath 1,299 $3,050 $2.35 $3,050 $2.35 1717 Two Bedroom 42 24.0% 988 $2,250 $2.28 $2.50 0.0% $2,250 $2.28 $2.50 2.0 Bath 1,203 $3,268 $2.72 $3,268 $2.72

AMLI at Evanston Two Bedroom 4 2.1% 1,000 $2,404 $2.40 $2.40 0.0% $2,404 $2.40 $2.40 1.0 Bath 1,000 $2,404 $2.40 $2,404 $2.40 AMLI at Evanston Two Bedroom 40 20.5% 1,064 $2,697 $2.53 $2.16 0.0% $2,697 $2.53 $2.16 2.0 Bath 1,590 $2,841 $1.79 $2,841 $1.79 Central Station Apartments Two Bedroom 18 22.5% 1,185 $3,043 $2.57 $2.57 8.3% $2,789 $2.35 $2.36 2.0 Bath 1,230 $3,163 $2.57 $2,899 $2.36 Centrum Evanston Two Bedroom 38 37.6% 986 $2,700 $2.74 $2.86 0.0% $2,700 $2.74 $2.86 2.0 Bath 1,278 $3,800 $2.97 $3,800 $2.97 E2 Two Bedroom 81 22.8% 934 $3,327 $3.56 $3.45 0.0% $3,327 $3.56 $3.45 2.0 Bath 1,097 $3,662 $3.34 $3,662 $3.34

Evanston Place Two Bedroom 24 12.6% 966 $2,660 $2.75 $2.79 0.0% $2,660 $2.75 $2.79 2.0 Bath 1,034 $2,920 $2.82 $2,920 $2.82

Park Evanston Two Bedroom 106 37.5% 1,017 $2,310 $2.27 $2.36 0.0% $2,310 $2.27 $2.36 2.0 Bath 1,315 $3,210 $2.44 $3,210 $2.44 The Main Two Bedroom 42 37.5% 912 $2,425 $2.66 $2.72 8.3% $2,223 $2.44 $2.50 2.0 Bath 1,068 $2,980 $2.79 $2,732 $2.56 The Reserve at Evanston Two Bedroom 16 8.3% 870 $2,184 $2.51 $2.48 0.0% $2,184 $2.51 $2.48 1.0 Bath 890 $2,184 $2.45 $2,184 $2.45 The Reserve at Evanston Two Bedroom 61 31.6% 1,010 $2,200 $2.18 $2.41 0.0% $2,200 $2.18 $2.41 2.0 Bath 1,110 $2,930 $2.64 $2,930 $2.64

The Residences of Wilmette Two Bedroom 32 42.7% 1,114 $3,095 $2.78 $2.79 0.0% $3,095 $2.78 $2.79 2.0 Bath 1,291 $3,625 $2.81 $3,625 $2.81

Total/Weighted Avgs 532 1,109 $2,914 $2.63 $2,887 $2.60

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 66

2BR Avg Net Effec Rent $3,600

$3,400

$3,200

$3,000

$2,800

$2,600

$2,400

$2,200

2BR Avg Net Effec Rent & Unit SF $3,600

$3,400

$3,200

$3,000

$2,800

$2,600

$2,400

$2,200 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300

2BR Avg Net Effec Rent PSF & Unit SF $3.75

$3.50

$3.25

$3.00

$2.75

$2.50

$2.25

$2.00 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 67

Two Bedroom Plus Den Units

Quoted Rent Net Effective Rent Unit Description U nits Pct Sq Ft Rent PSF Avg Concession Rent PSF Avg Central Station Apartments Two Bedroom + Den 6 7.5% 1,305 $3,500 $2.68 $2.68 8.3% $3,208 $2.46 $2.46 2.0 Bath 1,305 $3,500 $2.68 $3,208 $2.46 Evanston Place Two Bedroom + Den 22 11.6% 1,216 $3,970 $3.26 $3.26 0.0% $3,970 $3.26 $3.26 2.0 Bath 1,221 $3,970 $3.25 $3,970 $3.25

Total/Weighted Avgs 28 1,237 $3,869 $3.13 $3,807 $3.08

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 68

Three Bedroom Units

Quoted Rent Net Effective Rent Unit Description U nits Pct Sq Ft Rent PSF Avg Concession Rent PSF Avg 1620 Central Street Three Bedroom 8 17.8% 1,185 $3,108 $2.62 $2.62 0.0% $3,108 $2.62 $2.62 2.0 Bath 1,262 $3,307 $2.62 $3,307 $2.62 1717 Three Bedroom 14 8.0% 1,239 $3,320 $2.68 $2.70 0.0% $3,320 $2.68 $2.70 2.0 Bath 1,367 $3,717 $2.72 $3,717 $2.72 AMLI at Evanston Three Bedroom 12 6.2% 1,462 $4,033 $2.76 $2.67 0.0% $4,033 $2.76 $2.67 2.0 Bath 1,557 $4,033 $2.59 $4,033 $2.59 Central Station Apartments Three Bedroom 4 5.0% 1,485 $3,831 $2.58 $2.60 8.3% $3,512 $2.36 $2.39 2.0 Bath 1,485 $3,901 $2.63 $3,576 $2.41 Centrum Evanston Three Bedroom 6 5.9% 1,395 $4,000 $2.87 $2.77 0.0% $4,000 $2.87 $2.77 2.0 Bath 1,869 $5,000 $2.68 $5,000 $2.68 E2 Three Bedroom 11 3.1% 1,298 $3,937 $3.03 $3.10 0.0% $3,937 $3.03 $3.10 2.0 Bath 1,298 $4,122 $3.18 $4,122 $3.18 E2 Three Bedroom 12 3.4% 1,610 $4,136 $2.57 $2.54 0.0% $4,136 $2.57 $2.54 2.5-3.0 Bath 1,751 $4,386 $2.50 $4,386 $2.50

Evanston Place Three Bedroom 2 1.1% 1,968 $4,560 $2.32 $2.32 0.0% $4,560 $2.32 $2.32 2.5 Bath

Park Evanston Three Bedroom 15 5.3% 1,434 $3,615 $2.52 $2.45 0.0% $3,615 $2.52 $2.45 2.5 Bath 1,575 $3,745 $2.38 $3,745 $2.38 The Main Three Bedroom 7 6.3% 1,424 $3,560 $2.50 $2.50 8.3% $3,263 $2.29 $2.29 2.0 Bath 1,424 $3,560 $2.50 $3,263 $2.29 The Reserve at Evanston Three Bedroom 8 4.1% 1,205 $3,300 $2.74 $2.70 0.0% $3,300 $2.74 $2.70 2.0 Bath 1,445 $3,860 $2.67 $3,860 $2.67

The Residences of Wilmette Three Bedroom 6 8.0% 1,510 $4,765 $3.16 $3.38 0.0% $4,765 $3.16 $3.38 2.0 Bath 1,554 $5,615 $3.61 $5,615 $3.61

Total/Weighted Avgs 105 1,453 $3,907 $2.69 $3,875 $2.67

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 69

3BR Avg Net Effec Rent $5,250 $5,000 $4,750 $4,500 $4,250 $4,000 $3,750

$3,500

$3,250

$3,000

3BR Avg Net Effec Rent & Unit SF $5,250

$5,000 $4,750 $4,500 $4,250

$4,000 $3,750

$3,500 $3,250 $3,000 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

3BR Avg Net Eff Rent PSF & Unit SF $3.75

$3.50

$3.25

$3.00

$2.75

$2.50

$2.25 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 70

1620 Central Street North Shore 1620 Central St Class: A, Market Rate Evanston, Cook County, IL 60201 ID: 1648; YrQtr: 20172

Utility Description_____ L_ _T Service__ L_ _T Physical Profile*_____ Economic Profile______Lights  Trash  Units: 47 Occupancy: 35.6% Gas Forced Air Heat  Water  Avg Unit SF: 1,105 Quoted Rent: $2.42 Unit Central AC  Cable TV  Built: 2017 Concessions: 0.0% L=Landlord pays, T=Tenant pays Internet  Renovated: na Effective Rent: $2.42 ______Quoted Rent______Net Effective Rent_____ Unit Description___ Units _Pct_ Sq Ft _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Concession _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg One Bedroom 9 20.0% 601 $1,297 $2.16 $2.35 0.0% $1,297 $2.16 $2.35 1.0 Bath 816 $2,072 $2.54 $2,072 $2.54 Two Bedroom 28 62.2% 1,099 $2,637 $2.40 $2.37 0.0% $2,637 $2.40 $2.37 2.0 Bath 1,299 $3,050 $2.35 $3,050 $2.35 Three Bedroom 8 17.8% 1,185 $3,108 $2.62 $2.62 0.0% $3,108 $2.62 $2.62 2.0 Bath 1,262 $3,307 $2.62 $3,307 $2.62 *The property has 47 units; 45 units were surveyed. Average unit size and rents are based on units surveyed. Paid Parking: $160 (Reserved Gar/Encl) per month.

Amenities______Trends______Unit Appliance Common Yr-Qtr Quoted PSF Concession Occup % Net PSF Vinyl Plank Floors Dishwasher Pets Allowed 20172 $2.42 0.0% 35.6% $2.42 9' Ceiling Microwave LEED Certified 20171 $2.44 0.0% 11.1% $2.44 Smooth Ceiling Range - Gas Parking Window Roller Shades Refrigerator Attached Garage Quartz Counters WasherDryer Incl Undermount Sinks Fitness Patio/Balcony/Deck Bike Storage

Notes: Property has two 1BD affordable units that are not incl. in survey. RMK

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 71

1717 North Shore 1717 Ridge Class: A, Market Rate Evanston, Cook County, IL 60201 ID: 1186; YrQtr: 20172

Utility Description_____ L_ _T Service__ L_ _T Physical Profile______Economic Profile______Lights  Trash  Units: 175 Occupancy: 98.3% Gas Forced Air Heat  Water  Avg Unit SF: 835 Quoted Rent: $2.81 Unit Central AC  Cable TV  Built: 2013 Concessions: 0.0% L=Landlord pays, T=Tenant pays Internet  Renovated: na Effective Rent: $2.81 ______Quoted Rent______Net Effective Rent_____ Unit Description___ Units _Pct_ Sq Ft _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Concession _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Studio 14 8.0% 518 $1,590 $3.07 $3.07 0.0% $1,590 $3.07 $3.07 1.0 Bath 535 $1,640 $3.07 $1,640 $3.07 One Bedroom 101 57.7% 564 $1,775 $3.15 $3.04 0.0% $1,775 $3.15 $3.04 1.0 Bath 836 $2,450 $2.93 $2,450 $2.93 One Bedroom + Den 4 2.3% 933 $2,363 $2.53 $2.53 0.0% $2,363 $2.53 $2.53 1.0 Bath 933 $2,363 $2.53 $2,363 $2.53 Two Bedroom 42 24.0% 988 $2,250 $2.28 $2.50 0.0% $2,250 $2.28 $2.50 2.0 Bath 1,203 $3,268 $2.72 $3,268 $2.72 Three Bedroom 14 8.0% 1,239 $3,320 $2.68 $2.70 0.0% $3,320 $2.68 $2.70 2.0 Bath 1,367 $3,717 $2.72 $3,717 $2.72

Paid Parking: $140 (Reserved Gar/Encl) to $250 (Tandem Space) per month.

Amenities______Trends______Unit Appliance Common Yr-Qtr Quoted PSF Concession Occup % Net PSF Carpeting Disposal Business Center 20172 $2.81 0.0% 98.3% $2.81 Wood Floors Dishwasher Movie Theater Rm 20171 $2.71 0.0% 96.6% $2.71 9' Ceiling Microwave Smoke Free 20164 $2.75 0.0% 94.3% $2.75 Window Blinds Range - Gas Extra Storage 20163 $2.77 0.0% 96.0% $2.77 Granite Counters Refrigerator Pets Allowed 20162 $2.83 0.0% 93.1% $2.83 Tile Backsplash WasherDryer Incl Fire Pit 20161 $2.68 0.0% 90.3% $2.68 Undermount Sinks Fitness Grilling Area 20154 $2.68 0.0% 95.4% $2.68 Patio/Balcony/Deck Fitness Center LEED Silver 20153 $2.56 0.0% 90.9% $2.56 Fireplace Outdoor Pool Parking 20152 $2.85 0.0% 90.9% $2.85 Bike Storage Attached Garage Rooftop Sundeck

Notes: Atlantic Realty Partners

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 72

AMLI at Evanston North Shore 737 Chicago Ave Class: A, Market Rate Evanston, Cook County, IL 60202 ID: 1184; YrQtr: 20172

Utility Description_____ L_ _T Service__ L_ _T Physical Profile______Economic Profile______Lights  Trash  Units: 195 Occupancy: 91.8% Gas Forced Air Heat  Water  Avg Unit SF: 1,042 Quoted Rent: $2.31 Unit Central AC  Cable TV  Built: 2013 Concessions: 0.0% L=Landlord pays, T=Tenant pays Internet  Renovated: na Effective Rent: $2.31 ______Quoted Rent______Net Effective Rent_____ Unit Description___ Units _Pct_ Sq Ft _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Concession _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Studio 5 2.6% 500 $1,735 $3.47 $3.11 0.0% $1,735 $3.47 $3.11 1.0 Bath 633 $1,735 $2.74 $1,735 $2.74 One Bedroom 134 68.7% 632 $1,840 $2.91 $2.47 0.0% $1,840 $2.91 $2.47 1.0 Bath 1,237 $2,521 $2.04 $2,521 $2.04 Two Bedroom 4 2.1% 1,000 $2,404 $2.40 $2.40 0.0% $2,404 $2.40 $2.40 1.0 Bath 1,000 $2,404 $2.40 $2,404 $2.40 Two Bedroom 40 20.5% 1,064 $2,697 $2.53 $2.16 0.0% $2,697 $2.53 $2.16 2.0 Bath 1,590 $2,841 $1.79 $2,841 $1.79 Three Bedroom 12 6.2% 1,462 $4,033 $2.76 $2.67 0.0% $4,033 $2.76 $2.67 2.0 Bath 1,557 $4,033 $2.59 $4,033 $2.59

Paid Parking: $135 (Self-Park Gar/Encl) per month.

Amenities______Trends______Unit Appliance Common Yr-Qtr Quoted PSF Concession Occup % Net PSF Carpeting Dishwasher Business Center 20172 $2.31 0.0% 91.8% $2.31 Wood Floors Microwave Conference Room 20171 $2.31 0.0% 90.8% $2.31 Window Blinds Range - Gas Party/Social Room 20164 $2.31 0.0% 94.9% $2.31 Granite Counters Refrigerator Extra Storage 20163 $2.24 0.0% 96.4% $2.24 Granite Islands WasherDryer Incl Pets Allowed 20162 $2.32 0.0% 94.9% $2.32 Tile Backsplash Fitness Fire Pit 20161 $2.28 0.0% 95.4% $2.28 Undermount Sinks Fitness Center Grilling Area 20154 $2.12 0.0% 89.2% $2.12 Patio/Balcony/Deck Rooftop Sundeck LEED Silver 20153 $2.31 0.0% 97.4% $2.31 Parking 20152 $2.16 0.0% 97.9% $2.16 Self-Park Gar/Encl

Notes: Building contains 214 units with 19 first floor live/work units not included in survey. AMLI Opened 04/15/13.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 73

Central Station Apartments North Shore 1720 Central St Class: A, Market Rate Evanston, Cook County, IL 60201 ID: 1205; YrQtr: 20172

Utility Description_____ L_ _T Service__ L_ _T Physical Profile______Economic Profile______Lights  Trash  Units: 80 Occupancy: 92.5% Gas Forced Air Heat  Water  Avg Unit SF: 965 Quoted Rent: $2.63 Unit Central AC  Cable TV  Built: 2013 Concessions: 8.3% L=Landlord pays, T=Tenant pays Internet  Renovated: na Effective Rent: $2.41 ______Quoted Rent______Net Effective Rent_____ Unit Description___ Units _Pct_ Sq Ft _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Concession _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Convertible 8 10.0% 590 $1,815 $3.08 $3.02 8.3% $1,664 $2.82 $2.77 1.0 Bath 635 $1,887 $2.97 $1,730 $2.72 One Bedroom 32 40.0% 785 $1,943 $2.48 $2.55 8.3% $1,781 $2.27 $2.34 1.0 Bath 850 $2,231 $2.62 $2,045 $2.41 One Bedroom + Den 12 15.0% 885 $2,384 $2.69 $2.72 8.3% $2,185 $2.47 $2.50 1.0 Bath 885 $2,434 $2.75 $2,231 $2.52 Two Bedroom 18 22.5% 1,185 $3,043 $2.57 $2.57 8.3% $2,789 $2.35 $2.36 2.0 Bath 1,230 $3,163 $2.57 $2,899 $2.36 Two Bedroom + Den 6 7.5% 1,305 $3,500 $2.68 $2.68 8.3% $3,208 $2.46 $2.46 2.0 Bath 1,305 $3,500 $2.68 $3,208 $2.46 Three Bedroom 4 5.0% 1,485 $3,831 $2.58 $2.60 8.3% $3,512 $2.36 $2.39 2.0 Bath 1,485 $3,901 $2.63 $3,576 $2.41

Paid Parking: $160 (Self-Park Gar/Encl) per month.

Amenities______Trends______Unit Appliance Common Yr-Qtr Quoted PSF Concession Occup % Net PSF Carpeting Disposal Business Center 20172 $2.63 8.3% 92.5% $2.41 Wood Floors Dishwasher Party/Social Room 20171 $2.52 0.0% 88.8% $2.52 9' Ceiling Microwave Smoke Free 20164 $2.52 0.0% 93.8% $2.52 Window Blinds Range Pets Allowed 20163 $2.52 0.0% 95.0% $2.52 Quartz Counters Refrigerator Parking 20162 $2.52 0.0% 98.8% $2.52 Tile Backsplash WasherDryer Incl Self-Park Gar/Encl 20161 $2.48 0.0% 98.8% $2.48 Undermount Sinks Fitness 20154 $2.48 8.3% 90.0% $2.27 Patio/Balcony/Deck Fitness Center 20153 $2.48 3.9% 92.5% $2.38 20152 $2.48 0.0% 95.0% $2.48 Notes: Occupancy began September 27th, 2013. Property offers a utility package ranging RMK Management from $70-$120, depending on the unit size.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 74

Centrum Evanston North Shore 1590 Elmwood Ave Class: A, Market Rate Evanston, Cook County, IL 60201 ID: 1677; YrQtr: 20172

Utility Description_____ L_ _T Service__ L_ _T Physical Profile______Economic Profile______Lights  Trash  Units: 101 Occupancy: 32.7% Gas Forced Air Heat  Water  Avg Unit SF: 910 Quoted Rent: $3.00 Unit Central AC  Cable TV  Built: 2017 Concessions: 0.0% L=Landlord pays, T=Tenant pays Internet  Renovated: na Effective Rent: $3.00 ______Quoted Rent______Net Effective Rent_____ Unit Description___ Units _Pct_ Sq Ft _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Concession _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Convertible 21 20.8% 622 $1,775 $2.85 $3.16 0.0% $1,775 $2.85 $3.16 1.0 Bath 648 $2,250 $3.47 $2,250 $3.47 One Bedroom 36 35.6% 566 $1,925 $3.40 $3.24 0.0% $1,925 $3.40 $3.24 1.0 Bath 868 $2,675 $3.08 $2,675 $3.08 Two Bedroom 38 37.6% 986 $2,700 $2.74 $2.86 0.0% $2,700 $2.74 $2.86 2.0 Bath 1,278 $3,800 $2.97 $3,800 $2.97 Three Bedroom 6 5.9% 1,395 $4,000 $2.87 $2.77 0.0% $4,000 $2.87 $2.77 2.0 Bath 1,869 $5,000 $2.68 $5,000 $2.68

Amenities______Trends______Unit Appliance Common Yr-Qtr Quoted PSF Concession Occup % Net PSF Vinyl Plank Floors Disposal Business Center 20172 $3.00 0.0% 32.7% $3.00 10' Ceiling Dishwasher Party/Social Room Exp Concrete Ceil Microwave Smoke Free Window Roller Shades Range - Gas Pets Allowed Quartz Counters Refrigerator Fire Pit Tile Backsplash WasherDryer Incl Grilling Area Undermount Sinks Fitness Picnic Tables Patio/Balcony/Deck Fitness Center Valet Dry Cleaning Bike Storage Parking No Onsite Parking

Notes: Leasing began June/2017. Occupancy 08/2017. RUBS package (1BD-$100, Luxury Chicago Apartments 2BD-$125, 3BD-$150/mo). No on-site pkg. A municipal pkg garage located 1 blk East offers residents pkg for $85/Mo.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 75

E2 North Shore 1890 Maple Ave Class: A, Market Rate Evanston, Cook County, IL 60201 ID: 1395; YrQtr: 20172

Utility Description_____ L_ _T Service__ L_ _T Physical Profile______Economic Profile______Lights  Trash  Units: 356 Occupancy: 94.9% Gas Forced Air Heat  Water  Avg Unit SF: 799 Quoted Rent: $3.24 Unit Central AC  Cable TV  Built: 2015 Concessions: 0.0% L=Landlord pays, T=Tenant pays Internet  Renovated: na Effective Rent: $3.24 ______Quoted Rent______Net Effective Rent_____ Unit Description___ Units _Pct_ Sq Ft _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Concession _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Studio 48 13.5% 505 $1,825 $3.61 $3.52 0.0% $1,825 $3.61 $3.52 1.0 Bath 542 $1,860 $3.43 $1,860 $3.43 One Bedroom 204 57.3% 594 $1,845 $3.11 $3.18 0.0% $1,845 $3.11 $3.18 1.0 Bath 805 $2,615 $3.25 $2,615 $3.25 Two Bedroom 81 22.8% 934 $3,327 $3.56 $3.45 0.0% $3,327 $3.56 $3.45 2.0 Bath 1,097 $3,662 $3.34 $3,662 $3.34 Three Bedroom 11 3.1% 1,298 $3,937 $3.03 $3.10 0.0% $3,937 $3.03 $3.10 2.0 Bath 1,298 $4,122 $3.18 $4,122 $3.18 Three Bedroom 12 3.4% 1,610 $4,136 $2.57 $2.54 0.0% $4,136 $2.57 $2.54 2.5-3.0 Bath 1,751 $4,386 $2.50 $4,386 $2.50 ● Townhouse

Paid Parking: $145 (Self-Park Gar/Encl) to $195 (Reserved Gar/Encl) per month.

Amenities______Trends______Unit Appliance Common Yr-Qtr Quoted PSF Concession Occup % Net PSF Vinyl Plank Floors Disposal Doorman 20172 $3.24 0.0% 94.9% $3.24 9' Ceiling Dishwasher Business Center 20171 $2.57 0.0% 93.8% $2.57 Smooth Ceiling Microwave Conference Room 20164 $2.74 0.0% 94.9% $2.74 Window Blinds Range - Gas Movie Theater Rm 20163 $3.21 0.0% 94.1% $3.21 Quartz Counters Refrigerator Party/Social Room 20162 $2.92 0.0% 95.8% $2.92 Tile Backsplash WasherDryer Incl Smoke Free 20161 $2.96 0.0% 95.8% $2.96 Undermount Sinks Fitness Extra Storage 20154 $2.86 4.2% 90.7% $2.74 Patio/Balcony/Deck Fitness Center Pets Allowed 20153 $2.81 0.0% 83.1% $2.81 Outdoor Pool Fire Pit 20152 $2.95 0.0% 80.1% $2.95 Whirlpool Grilling Area Basketball Court LEED Silver Rooftop Sundeck Parking Attached Garage

Notes: Leasing began in Feb. 2015 with occupancy beginning March 1, 2015. Parking Greystar garage is open air. Utility package includes all but electric and ranges from $85 (studios) to $150 (3BD).

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 76

Evanston Place North Shore 1715-1735 Chicago Avenue (E of Chicago, N of Church) Class: B, Market Rate Evanston, Cook County, IL 60201 ID: 316; YrQtr: 20172

Utility Description_____ L_ _T Service__ L_ _T Physical Profile______Economic Profile______Lights  Trash  Units: 190 Occupancy: Electric Baseboard Heat  Water  Avg Unit SF: 864 Quoted Rent: $2.88 Unit Central AC  Cable TV  Built: 1991 Concessions: 0.0% L=Landlord pays, T=Tenant pays Internet  Renovated: 2015 Effective Rent: $2.88 ______Quoted Rent______Net Effective Rent_____ Unit Description___ Units _Pct_ Sq Ft _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Concession _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Studio 16 8.4% 567 $1,800 $3.17 $3.17 0.0% $1,800 $3.17 $3.17 1.0 Bath 567 $1,800 $3.17 $1,800 $3.17 One Bedroom 86 45.3% 657 $1,830 $2.79 $2.66 0.0% $1,830 $2.79 $2.66 1.0 Bath 835 $2,120 $2.54 $2,120 $2.54 One Bedroom 8 4.2% 852 $2,275 $2.67 $2.67 0.0% $2,275 $2.67 $2.67 1.5 Bath 852 $2,275 $2.67 $2,275 $2.67 One Bedroom + Den 16 8.4% 878 $2,925 $3.33 $3.33 0.0% $2,925 $3.33 $3.33 1.0 Bath 878 $2,925 $3.33 $2,925 $3.33 One Bedroom + Den 16 8.4% 958 $2,870 $3.00 $3.00 0.0% $2,870 $3.00 $3.00 1.5 Bath 958 $2,870 $3.00 $2,870 $3.00 Two Bedroom 24 12.6% 966 $2,660 $2.75 $2.79 0.0% $2,660 $2.75 $2.79 2.0 Bath 1,034 $2,920 $2.82 $2,920 $2.82 Two Bedroom + Den 22 11.6% 1,216 $3,970 $3.26 $3.26 0.0% $3,970 $3.26 $3.26 2.0 Bath 1,221 $3,970 $3.25 $3,970 $3.25 Three Bedroom 2 1.1% 1,968 $4,560 $2.32 $2.32 0.0% $4,560 $2.32 $2.32 2.5 Bath 1,968 $4,560 $2.32 $4,560 $2.32

Paid Parking: $90 (Self-Park Gar/Encl) per month.

Amenities______Trends______Unit Appliance Common Yr-Qtr Quoted PSF Concession Occup % Net PSF Carpeting Disposal Laundry Room 20172 $2.88 0.0% $2.88 Vinyl Plank Floors Dishwasher Business Center 20171 $2.55 0.0% $2.55 Popcorn Ceiling Microwave Clubhouse 20164 $2.51 0.0% $2.51 Window Blinds Range - Electric Party/Social Room 20163 $2.52 0.0% $2.52 Laminate Counters Refrigerator Smoke Free 20162 $2.92 0.0% $2.92 Quartz Counters Fitness Extra Storage 20161 $2.79 0.0% $2.79 Tile Backsplash Fitness Center Pets Allowed 20154 $2.18 0.0% $2.18 Undermount Sinks Outdoor Pool Grilling Area 20153 $2.23 0.0% $2.23 Patio/Balcony/Deck Bike Storage Parking 20152 $2.68 0.0% $2.68 Rooftop Sundeck Self-Park Gar/Encl 20151 $2.61 0.0% $2.61

Notes: Property uses a RUBS utility program. Two identical towers with 95 units each. AIMCO

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 77

Park Evanston North Shore 1630 Chicago Avenue (Chicago, S of Church) Class: A, Market Rate Evanston, Cook County, IL 60201 ID: 315; YrQtr: 20172

Utility Description_____ L_ _T Service__ L_ _T Physical Profile______Economic Profile______Lights  Trash  Units: 283 Occupancy: 98.9% Gas Forced Air Heat  Water  Avg Unit SF: 923 Quoted Rent: $2.67 Unit Central AC  Cable TV  Built: 1997 Concessions: 0.0% L=Landlord pays, T=Tenant pays Internet  Renovated: na Effective Rent: $2.67 ______Quoted Rent______Net Effective Rent_____ Unit Description___ Units _Pct_ Sq Ft _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Concession _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Studio 28 9.9% 514 $1,715 $3.34 $3.42 0.0% $1,715 $3.34 $3.42 1.0 Bath 540 $1,890 $3.50 $1,890 $3.50 One Bedroom 115 40.6% 589 $1,915 $3.25 $3.09 0.0% $1,915 $3.25 $3.09 1.0 Bath 800 $2,338 $2.92 $2,338 $2.92 One Bedroom + Den 19 6.7% 1,049 $2,655 $2.53 $2.64 0.0% $2,655 $2.53 $2.64 1.5 Bath 1,094 $2,998 $2.74 $2,998 $2.74 Two Bedroom 106 37.5% 1,017 $2,310 $2.27 $2.36 0.0% $2,310 $2.27 $2.36 2.0 Bath 1,315 $3,210 $2.44 $3,210 $2.44 Three Bedroom 15 5.3% 1,434 $3,615 $2.52 $2.45 0.0% $3,615 $2.52 $2.45 2.5 Bath 1,575 $3,745 $2.38 $3,745 $2.38

Paid Parking: $115 (Surface Parking) to $135 (Self-Park Gar/Encl) per month.

Amenities______Trends______Unit Appliance Common Yr-Qtr Quoted PSF Concession Occup % Net PSF Carpeting Disposal Laundry Room 20172 $2.67 0.0% 98.9% $2.67 Popcorn Ceiling Dishwasher Business Center 20171 $2.23 0.0% 96.8% $2.23 Window Blinds Microwave Party/Social Room 20164 $2.67 0.0% 98.2% $2.67 Granite Counters Range - Gas Extra Storage 20163 $2.79 0.0% 98.6% $2.79 Patio/Balcony/Deck Refrigerator Pets Allowed 20162 $2.68 0.0% 98.9% $2.68 WasherDryer Incl Valet Dry Cleaning 20161 $2.63 0.0% 97.2% $2.63 Fitness Parking 20154 $2.56 0.0% 94.3% $2.56 Fitness Center Self-Park Gar/Encl 20153 $2.56 0.0% 96.1% $2.56 Outdoor Pool 20152 $2.48 0.0% 98.2% $2.48 Sauna Bike Storage

Notes: Property uses a RUBS utilities program. Original kitchens and baths with laminate Lincoln Property cabinets & white appliances; vinyl kitchen floors below 15th floor, ceramic tile above.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 78

Residences of Wilmette North Shore 617 Green Bay Rd Class: A, Market Rate Wilmette, Cook County, IL 60091 ID: 1,687; YrQtr: 20172

Utility Description_____ L_ _T Service__ L_ _T Physical Profile_____ Economic Profile______Lights  Trash  Units: 75 Occupancy: Gas Forced Air Heat  Water  Avg Unit SF: 1,013 Quoted Rent: $2.98 Unit Central AC  Cable TV  Built: 2017 Concessions: 0.0% L=Landlord pays, T=Tenant pays Broadband  Renovated: na Effective Rent: $2.98 ______Quoted Rent______Net Effective Rent_____ Unit Description___ Units _Pct_ Sq Ft _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Concession _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Studio 4 5.3% 657 $2,100 $3.20 $3.20 0.0% $2,100 $3.20 $3.20 1.0 Bath 657 $2,100 $3.20 $2,100 $3.20 One Bedroom 29 38.7% 740 $2,440 $3.30 $3.14 0.0% $2,440 $3.30 $3.14 1.0 Bath 789 $2,350 $2.98 $2,350 $2.98 One Bedroom + Den 4 5.3% 882 $2,545 $2.89 $2.89 0.0% $2,545 $2.89 $2.89 1.0 Bath 882 $2,545 $2.89 $2,545 $2.89 Two Bedroom 32 42.7% 1,114 $3,095 $2.78 $2.79 0.0% $3,095 $2.78 $2.79 2.0 Bath 1,291 $3,625 $2.81 $3,625 $2.81 Three Bedroom 6 8.0% 1,510 $4,765 $3.16 $3.38 0.0% $4,765 $3.16 $3.38 2.0 Bath 1,554 $5,615 $3.61 $5,615 $3.61

Amenities______Trends______Unit Appliance Common Yr-Qtr Quoted PSF Concession Occup % Net PSF Vinyl Plank Floors Dishwasher Business Center 20172 $2.98 0.0% $2.98 9.5' Ceiling Microwave Conference Room Smooth Ceiling Range - Gas Dining Event Room Window Roller Shades Refrigerator Party/Social Room Quartz Counters WasherDryer Incl Smoke Free Tile Backsplash Fitness Extra Storage Undermount Sinks Fitness Center Pets Allowed Patio/Balcony/Deck Sauna Fire Pit Hot Tub Grilling Area Steam Room Picnic Tables Bike Storage Car Charging Station Rooftop Sundeck Pet Wash Station Valet Dry Cleaning LEED Silver Parking Reserved Gar/Encl

Notes: Occupancy Fall, 2017. RMK

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 79

The Main North Shore 847 Chicago Class: A, Market Rate Evanston, Cook County, IL 60202 ID: 1548; YrQtr: 20172

Utility Description_____ L_ _T Service__ L_ _T Physical Profile______Economic Profile______Lights  Trash  Units: 112 Occupancy: 70.5% Gas Forced Air Heat  Water  Avg Unit SF: 889 Quoted Rent: $2.70 Unit Central AC  Cable TV  Built: 2016 Concessions: 8.3% L=Landlord pays, T=Tenant pays Internet  Renovated: na Effective Rent: $2.48 ______Quoted Rent______Net Effective Rent_____ Unit Description___ Units _Pct_ Sq Ft _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Concession _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Studio 14 12.5% 500 $1,545 $3.09 $2.96 8.3% $1,416 $2.83 $2.71 1.0 Bath 650 $1,840 $2.83 $1,687 $2.59 One Bedroom 35 31.3% 746 $2,020 $2.71 $2.71 8.3% $1,852 $2.48 $2.48 1.0 Bath 853 $2,315 $2.71 $2,122 $2.49 One Bedroom 14 12.5% 853 $2,185 $2.56 $2.59 8.3% $2,003 $2.35 $2.37 1.0 Bath 853 $2,235 $2.62 $2,049 $2.40 Two Bedroom 42 37.5% 912 $2,425 $2.66 $2.72 8.3% $2,223 $2.44 $2.50 2.0 Bath 1,068 $2,980 $2.79 $2,732 $2.56 Three Bedroom 7 6.3% 1,424 $3,560 $2.50 $2.50 8.3% $3,263 $2.29 $2.29 2.0 Bath 1,424 $3,560 $2.50 $3,263 $2.29

Paid Parking: $165 (Reserved Gar/Encl) to $215 (Tandem Space) per month.

Amenities______Trends______Unit Appliance Common Yr-Qtr Quoted PSF Concession Occup % Net PSF Carpeting Disposal Party/Social Room 20172 $2.70 8.3% 70.5% $2.48 Vinyl Plank Floors Dishwasher Extra Storage 20171 $2.66 12.5% 50.0% $2.33 Smooth Ceiling Microwave Gigibit Internet 20164 $2.73 6.8% 25.9% $2.55 Window Roller Shades Range - Gas Fire Pit 20163 $2.66 6.9% 16.1% $2.47 Quartz Counters Refrigerator Grilling Area 20162 $2.66 3.8% 12.5% $2.56 Tile Backsplash WasherDryer Incl Car Charging Station Undermount Sinks Fitness Parking Patio/Balcony/Deck Fitness Center Attached Garage Bike Storage

Notes: Leasing began 05/2016. Occupancy began 10/01/2016. Atlantic Realty Partners

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 80

The Reserve at Evanston North Shore 1930 Ridge Avenue (E of Ridge, N of Emerson) Class: A, Market Rate Evanston, Cook County, IL 60201 ID: 541; YrQtr: 20172

Utility Description_____ L_ _T Service__ L_ _T Physical Profile______Economic Profile______Lights  Trash  Units: 193 Occupancy: 96.9% Gas Forced Air Heat  Water  Avg Unit SF: 839 Quoted Rent: $2.63 Unit Central AC  Cable TV  Built: 2003 Concessions: 0.0% L=Landlord pays, T=Tenant pays Internet  Renovated: na Effective Rent: $2.63 ______Quoted Rent______Net Effective Rent_____ Unit Description___ Units _Pct_ Sq Ft _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Concession _Rent_ _PSF_ PSF Avg Studio 7 3.6% 550 $1,493 $2.71 $2.68 0.0% $1,493 $2.71 $2.68 1.0 Bath 645 $1,700 $2.64 $1,700 $2.64 ● Reduced Move In Fees One Bedroom 101 52.3% 575 $1,775 $3.09 $2.88 0.0% $1,775 $3.09 $2.88 1.0 Bath 780 $2,087 $2.68 $2,087 $2.68 ● Reduced Move In Fees Two Bedroom 16 8.3% 870 $2,184 $2.51 $2.48 0.0% $2,184 $2.51 $2.48 1.0 Bath 890 $2,184 $2.45 $2,184 $2.45 ● Reduced Move In Fees Two Bedroom 61 31.6% 1,010 $2,200 $2.18 $2.41 0.0% $2,200 $2.18 $2.41 2.0 Bath 1,110 $2,930 $2.64 $2,930 $2.64 ● Reduced Move In Fees Three Bedroom 8 4.1% 1,205 $3,300 $2.74 $2.70 0.0% $3,300 $2.74 $2.70 2.0 Bath 1,445 $3,860 $2.67 $3,860 $2.67 ● Reduced Move In Fees

Paid Parking: $140 (Reserved Gar/Encl) to $225 (Tandem Space) per month.

Amenities______Trends______Unit Appliance Common Yr-Qtr Quoted PSF Concession Occup % Net PSF Carpeting Disposal Laundry Room 20172 $2.63 0.0% 96.9% $2.63 9' Ceiling Dishwasher Business Center 20171 $2.53 0.0% 90.7% $2.53 Window Blinds Microwave Clubhouse 20164 $2.41 0.0% 92.7% $2.41 Granite Counters Range - Gas Extra Storage 20163 $2.43 0.0% 99.0% $2.43 Undermount Sinks Refrigerator Pets Allowed 20162 $2.32 0.0% 99.5% $2.32 Patio/Balcony/Deck WasherDryer Incl Parking 20161 $2.19 0.0% 100.0% $2.19 Fitness Attached Garage 20154 $2.19 0.0% 95.9% $2.19 Fitness Center Self-Park Gar/Encl 20153 $2.21 0.0% 90.2% $2.21 Outdoor Pool 20152 $2.33 0.0% 96.4% $2.33 Bike Storage

Notes: Approximately 50% of residents are reported to be affiliated with Northwestern Habitat (mostly grad students). Basic cable and internet are included in the rent.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 81

NEW RENTAL DEVELOPMENT – LEASE-UP ABSORPTION SURVEY

We have surveyed the market in order to determine the lease-up rates which have been achieved in newly constructed rental buildings in the Suburban Chicago market. Developments which have started lease-up since 2013 are summarized on the following page.

The survey is showing average monthly absorption rates generally ranging from 10 to 20 units per month. Some of the slower leasing properties had issues particularly pertaining to that property, such as challenging locations and seasonal issues that can affect lease-up; for example, properties opening in the 3rd or 4th quarter start out more slowly and generally will not see a pickup in activity until the spring leasing season. Others, like Evanston’s E2, have outperformed these averages.

While Evanston has historically been the strongest North Shore suburb, there are additional projects which are being proposed for development which could be delivering new units at the same time as the subject property. Considering the likelihood of this additional competition, we have projected the lease-up of the property in approximately 18 to 24 months.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 82

Suburban Lease-up Survey

Absorption of New Rental Units © 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors, All Rights Reserved Leasing Total Avg. Nam e Suburb Submarket Be gan Delivered Units 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 /mo Status Stabilized The Springs at 127th Plainfield Will 1Q2013 Feb-13 340 102 79 18 56 44 28 19 Stabilized Amli Evanston Evanston North Shore 1Q 2013 Mar-13 195 22 29 36 31 34 25 11 Stabilized 1717 Evanston North Shore 1Q 2013 Mar-13 175 5 101 33 8 22 13 Stabilized Ninety7Fifty on the Park Orland Park South Cook 2Q 2013 Apr-13 295 97 86 24 38 30 18 Stabilized Randall Highlands North Aurora Kane 2Q 2013 Apr-13 146 11 34 32 25 37 9 Stabilized Algonquin Square Algonquin Kane 2Q 2013 Jun-13 220 15 21 70 61 49 18 Stabilized Central Station Evanston North Shore 2Q 2013 Sep-13 80 6 22 11 17 16 6 Stabilized Avant at the Arboretum Lisle DuPage 3Q 2013 Sep-13 310 31 36 66 28 56 27 36 15 14 Stabilized Wheaton 121 Wheaton DuPage 3Q 2013 Sep-13 306 76 138 0 31 15 18 3 16 Stabilized Tapestry Naperville Naperville Naperville/Aurora 2Q 2014 Apr-14 298 87 44 14 29 55 19 28 15 Stabilized One Arlington Arlington Heights Cook NW 3Q 2014 Sep-14 214 30 21 10 64 39 22 15 11 Stabilized Tapestry Glenview Glenview North Shore 3Q 2014 Sep-14 290 20 21 37 57 33 26 19 23 24 11 Stabilized Midtow n Square Glenview North Shore 4Q 2014 Dec-14 138 28 34 35 30 14 Stabilized E2 Evanston North Shore 1Q 2015 Mar-15 356 146 139 11 27 18 28 Stabilized Woodview Deerfield North Shore 1Q 2015 Jun-15 248 77 49 13 37 43 10 15 Stabilized Park 205 Park Ridge Cook NW 3Q 2015 Oct-15 115 25 26 24 12 15 9 Stabilized Oaks of Vernon Hills Vernon Hills Lake 3Q 2014 Sep-14 336 49 8 78 49 72 0 -8 34 22 13 Stabilized Courthouse Square Wheaton DuPage 1Q 2016 May-16 149 39 30 13 17 48 10 Stabilized 14

In lease-up Reserve at Glenview Glenview North Shore 1Q 2015 May-15 239 43 43 17 45 22 20 14 8 1 8 89% In lease-up Amli Deerfield Deerfield North Shore 2Q 2015 Aug-15 240 54 12 37 35 10 10 15 38 9 88% In lease-up Northgate Crossing Wheeling Cook NW 4Q 2015 Jan-16 288 40 41 35 35 36 42 11 80% In lease-up Orland Park Crossing Orland Park South Cook 1Q 2016 May-16 231 40 59 35 39 17 11 15 87% In lease-up Apex 41 Lombard DuPage 2Q 2016 Oct-16 181 15 15 15 71 13 64% In lease-up Springs at Weber Road Romeoville Will 2Q 2016 Aug-16 292 44 80 14 87 19 77% In lease-up The Main Evanston North Shore 2Q 2016 Oct-16 112 18 11 2 48 9 71% In lease-up 500 Station Blvd Aurora Naperville/Aurora 3Q 2015 Dec-16 425 23 53 62 20 33% In lease-up Metro 59 Aurora Naperville/Aurora 2Q 2016 Feb-17 232 16 65 16 35% In lease-up Brook on Janes Bolingbrook Will 1Q 2017 Mar-17 288 60 98 40 55% In lease-up North 680 Schaumburg Cook NW 1Q 2017 Apr-17 180 23 52 12 42% In lease-up Hamilton Lakes Itas c a Cook NW 2Q2017 Jun-17 297 65 22 22% In lease-up 16 Total 129 332 341 417 301 332 230 137 373 534 375 171 267 308 278 240 276 688 Avg/Bldg/Qtr 43.0 55.3 37.9 46.3 33.4 36.9 32.9 19.6 46.6 59.3 37.5 19.0 26.7 34.2 23.2 26.7 23.0 53.0 Avg M onthly Absorption Per Building 14.3 18.4 12.6 15.4 11.1 12.3 11.0 6.5 15.5 19.8 12.5 6.3 8.9 11.4 7.7 8.9 7.7 17.7 For absorption pursposes, buildings are considered stabilized at 90% leased

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 83

Representative List of Property Types Appraised

Affordable Housing Historic/Landmark Religious Institutions Air Pollution Control Facility Land/Acreage Restaurants Apartments Industrial Rights-of-Way Assisted Living Facilities Residential Senior Housing Automobile Showrooms Loft Buildings Service Station Sites Commercial Medical Centers Shopping Centers/Malls Condominiums Mobile Home Parks Special Purpose Property Cooperative Apts. Motels/Hotels Subdivisions Corporate Headquarters Nursing Homes Supermarkets Eleemosynary Prop. Office Buildings Warehouses Garages Recreational Properties

FEASIBILITY STUDIES MARKET RESEARCH HIGHEST AND BEST USE

Representative List of Clients

ATTORNEYS BANKS REAL ESTATE ORGANIZATIONS Arnstein & Lehr Amalgamated Bank AIMCO Baker & McKenzie Associated Bank AMLI Burke, Warren, MacKay & Serritella Bank Financial Avalon Bay DLA Piper Bank of America Focus Development Freeborn & Peters Bank Leumi Golub & Company Mayer Brown BMO Harris Bank Hines McDermott Will & Emery Cathay Bank Jones Lang LaSalle Rinella & Rinella Centier Bank Lend Lease Schiff Hardin Centrue Bank Lennar Schiller, Ducanto & Fleck Community Investment Corp. Lincoln Property Seibel Law Offices Fifth Third Magellan Development Group Stafford Rosenbaum First American Bank McCaffery Interests Taft Stettinius & Hollister First Eagle Bank Mesirow Financial First Midwest Bank Moran & Co INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE First Bank Highland Park Morningside BANKERS/PENSION FUND ADVISORS JPMorgan Chase Bank Marquette Companies American Realty Advisors KeyBank Newcastle Limited Amerisphere Lakeside Bank Opus Development Berkadia Commercial Mortgage MB Financial Oxford Capital Bellwether Enterprise Real Estate Capital, LLC Oxford Bank & Trust Related Midwest Cambridge Realty Capital of Illinois PNC Bank Sterling Bay Cornerstone Real Estate Advisors Republic Bank The Fifield Companies Draper & Kramer TCF National Bank The Habitat Company Gershman Mortgage The Northern Trust The John Buck Company Goldman Sachs The Private Bank Trammel Crow Greystone Funding US Bank Village Green Companies Heitman Wells Fargo Waterton Residential Holliday Fenoglio Fowler Wintrust Financial Corp. Inland Mortgage Corp. GOVERNMENT BODIES/ORGANIZATIONS JP Morgan INSURANCE COMPANIES American Medical Association Boy Scouts of America Kensington Realty Advisors Allstate Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation Love Funding John Hancock Illinois Housing Development Authority M&T Realty Capital Manulife Internal Revenue Service National Real Estate Advisors MetLife Mercy Housing NorthMarq Capital Nationwide Life National Association of Realtors PNC Multifamily Mortgage New York Life Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Principal Capital Real Estate Investors Pacific Life U.S. Air Force Red Mortgage Capital Principal U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Prudential U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development State Farm U.S. General Services Administration Union Labor Life U.S. Navy

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com Page 84

QUALIFICATIONS OF GAIL LISSNER, CRE, SRA

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Vice President and Appraiser for Appraisal Research Counselors.

EDUCATION: Bachelor of Arts from Washington University, 1972. Phi Beta Kappa, 1972.

STATE OF ILLINOIS: Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Licensed Real Estate Managing Broker

THE COUNSELORS OF REAL ESTATE: CRE Designation

APPRAISAL INSTITUTE: SRA Certificate #2049, Currently Certified.

LAMBDA ALPHA INTERNATIONAL: Member of the Honorary Land Economics Society. Ely Chapter. Initiated in 2000.

FEATURED SPEAKER: Many speaking engagements pertaining to the housing market, with multiple appearances before organizations such as the Realty Club, Chicago Real Estate Council (CREC), Chicago Association of Realtors, City of Chicago Chapter of the Home Builders Association of Greater Chicago, the Appraisal Institute Chicago Chapter, Chicago Mortgage Attorneys Association, Jewish United Fund Real Estate Division, the Illinois CPA Society, National Real Estate Investment Association (REIA), National Association of Real Estate Investment Managers (NAREIM), the Lincoln Park Builders of Chicago, the Counselors of Real Estate, Chicagoland Apartment Association, Private Bank, Citigroup, the Midwest Builders Conference, Roosevelt University, and University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). Frequently quoted in both local and national media.

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Appraisal Institute (AI), Counselors of Real Estate (Secretary/Treasurer of the Midwest Chapter: 2009-2014), Realty Club of Chicago (Vice President: 2015/ President: 2016 Term), Lambda Alpha International, Chicago Real Estate Council (CREC), Commercial Real Estate Women (CREW), Real Estate Investment Association (REIA), North Shore Barrington Board of Realtors. Mentor for the Goldie B. Wolfe Miller Women Leaders in Real Estate Program at Roosevelt University 2008-2010. Named by Crains Chicago Business as one of the Crains 20 Women to Watch 2008.

EXPERIENCE: Overall experience includes appraisals and analytical studies of commercial, mixed-use, apartment, condominium, townhome and residential developments in addition to marketability and feasibility studies in a variety of new developments and existing projects.

Experience includes appraisals of various types of real estate with a primary focus on the Chicago metropolitan area but experience in other cities in the United States.

 2017 Appraisal Research Counselors www.AppraisalResearch.com

Traffic Impact Study

601 – 605 Davis Street

Evanston, Illinois

Prepared for:

Vermilion Development

October 4, 2017

Contents

List of Figures and Tables, ii

Executive Summary ...... 1 1. Introduction ...... 3 2. Existing Conditions ...... 7 Site Location ...... 7 Existing Street System Characteristics ...... 7 Alternative Modes of Transportation ...... 9 Existing Traffic Volumes ...... 11 3. Traffic Characteristics of Proposed Development ...... 14 Proposed Plan and Phasing ...... 14 Development Access ...... 14 Pedestrian Access...... 14 Truck Loading ...... 14 Directional Distribution ...... 15 Development Traffic Generation ...... 15 4. Projected Traffic Conditions ...... 19 Planned Developments...... 19 Other Area Growth ...... 19 Total Projected Traffic Volumes ...... 19 5. Traffic Analysis and Recommendations ...... 21 Discussion and Recommendations ...... 28 Transportation Sustainability Recommendations ...... 29 6. Conclusion ...... 30

Appendix

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois i

List of Figures and Tables

Figures

1. Site Location ...... 5 2. Aerial View of Site Location ...... 6 3. Existing Street Characteristics ...... 8 4. Public Transportation Available ...... 10 5. Existing Traffic Volumes ...... 12 6. Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Traffic Volumes ...... 13 7. Estimated Directional Distribution ...... 17 8. Estimated Development-Generated Traffic ...... 18 9. Total Projected Traffic Volumes ...... 20

Tables

1. Projected Site-Generated Traffic Volumes ...... 16 2. Capacity Analysis Results - Davis Street with Chicago Avenue ...... 22 3. Capacity Analysis Results - Davis Street with Orrington Avenue ...... 23 4. Capacity Analysis Results - Davis Street with Sherman Avenue ...... 24 5. Capacity Analysis Results - Church Street with Chicago Avenue ...... 25 6. Capacity Analysis Results - Church Street with Orrington Avenue ...... 26 7. Capacity Analysis Results - Unsignalized Intersections ...... 27

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois ii

Executive Summary

This report summarizes the results of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) to assess the impact of the mixed-use development in Evanston, Illinois. The site is located at 601 – 605 Davis Street in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Davis Street and Chicago Avenue. Currently, the site contains an existing two-story retail building and Chase Bank drive-through.

The objectives of the traffic study were as follows:

• Determine the existing vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, and public transportation conditions in the study area to establish a base condition.

• Assess the impact that the proposed redevelopment will have on transportation conditions in the area.

• Determine any street, access, bicycle, and pedestrian modification and/or improvements that will be necessary to effectively accommodate and mitigate future conditions.

Accessibility to and from the area is enhanced by various alternative modes of transportation. The Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) Purple ‘L’ train lines are provided within a half-mile of the site and multiple CTA bus routes have stops in the area. In addition, pedestrian facilities including sidewalks and crosswalks are generally provided on all streets within in the area. Barrier-protected bike lanes are provided on Davis Street and Church Street. Car-sharing vehicles are also located within the area.

Vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle counts were conducted during the weekday morning and evening peak periods in order to determine the general transportation conditions during these time periods. The following intersections were analyzed as part of this study:

• Davis Street and Chicago Avenue • Davis Street and Orrington Avenue • Davis Street and Sherman Avenue • Church Street and Chicago Avenue • Church Street and Orrington Avenue • Davis Street and North-South Alley • Church Street and North-South Alley

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 1

The proposed development will be a 33-story building containing approximately 318 apartments, approximately 7,405 square feet of retail space, and two ATM drive-through lanes. A 176-space parking garage will be provided to serve the development with access off the North-South Alley that runs along the site’s west property line between Davis Street and Church Street Access to the ATMs will be provided via an entrance on Davis Street and an exit on the alley.

The volume of new traffic to be generated by the development will be reduced given the site location within Evanston’s central business district and the proximity of alternative modes of transportation. In addition to the development-generated traffic and the traffic from other planned/proposed developments in the vicinity of the area, the existing vehicular traffic volumes were increased by three percent and the existing pedestrian and bicycle volumes were increased by 10 percent to reflect future growth in the area.

Based on the preceding analyses and recommendations, the following conclusions were made:

• Given the location of the site within the central business district and its proximity to alternative modes of transportation, the number of vehicles trips generated by the development will be reduced.

• The existing roadway system can sufficiently accommodate the traffic to be generated by the proposed development.

• Consideration should be given to providing additional green time to the northbound left- turn phase at the intersection of Davis Street and Chicago Avenue in order to reduce queuing of northbound traffic.

• Access to the development parking garage off the public alley will adequately accommodate the site-generated traffic.

• The two-lane ATM drive-through facility will adequately accommodate the traffic volumes generated.

• Pedestrian countdown timers should be provided at all signalized intersections in the study area.

• Continental crosswalks should be provided at all approaches of every intersection within the study area.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 2

1. Introduction

This report summarizes the results of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for the proposed mixed-use development at in Evanston, Illinois. The site is located at 601 – 605 Davis Street in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Davis Street and Chicago Avenue. Currently, the site contains an existing two-story retail building, a vacant lot, and a Chase Bank drive-through.

The proposed development will be a 33-story building containing approximately 318 apartments, approximately 7,405 square feet of retail space, and two ATM drive-through lanes. A 176-space parking garage will be provided to serve the development with access off the North-South Alley that runs along the site’s west property line between Davis Street and Church Street Access to the ATMs will be provided via an entrance on Davis Street and an exit on the alley.

Figure 1 shows the location of the development in relation to the area roadway system and Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the parcel.

The purpose of this study is as follows:

• Determine the existing vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, and public transportation conditions in the study area to establish a base condition.

• Assess the impact that the proposed development will have on transportation conditions in the area.

• Determine any street, access, bicycle, and pedestrian modification and/or improvements that will be necessary to effectively accommodate and mitigate future conditions.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 3

The sections of this report present the following:

• Existing street conditions including vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle volumes for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours.

• A detailed description of the proposed development.

• Vehicle trip generation and directional distribution for the proposed development.

• Background growth in traffic for future conditions, which includes planned developments and a regional growth factor, applied to the existing peak hour traffic volumes within the traffic study area.

• Intersection capacity analyses for existing and future projected conditions for both the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours.

• Recommendations with respect to vehicular site access, the surrounding street network, and pedestrian and bicycle features for the future condition.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 4

SITE

Site Location Figure 1

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 5

Aerial View of Site Location Figure 2

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 6

2. Existing Conditions

Existing street and traffic conditions within the study area were documented based on field visits and transportation counts. The following provides a summary of the physical characteristics of the streets including geometry and traffic control, alternative modes of transportation available in the area, and the peak hour vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle flows along area streets.

Site Location

The site is located on the north side of Davis Street between Chicago Avenue on the east and the North-South Alley on the west. This site is located within Evanston’s Central Business District, which generally consists of commercial, office, and multi-story residential developments. The site currently contains an existing two-story retail building, a vacant lot, and a Chase Bank drive- through with multiple lanes.

Existing Street System Characteristics

The characteristics of the existing streets within the study area are illustrated in Figure 3 and described below. All streets are under the jurisdiction of the City of Evanston.

Chicago Avenue is a north-south, two-way roadway. In the vicinity of the site, Chicago Avenue provides a single lane in each direction, although it operates as two lanes in each direction. In addition, parallel metered parking is generally permitted on both sides of the road. Chicago Avenue is under traffic signal control at its intersections with Davis Street and Church Street. Chicago Avenue has a posted speed limit of 30 mph.

Davis Street is an east-west roadway that is restricted to one-way westbound traffic flow with signalized intersections at Chicago Avenue, Orrington Avenue, and Sherman Avenue. Davis Street provides two westbound lanes with metered parallel parking provided on both sides of the road and a barrier-protected bike lane for westbound travel. West of Sherman Avenue, Davis Street provides three westbound lanes with parallel metered parking provided on the south side of the road and a barrier-protected bike lane on the north side.

Church Street is an east-west roadway restricted to one-way eastbound traffic flow with signalized intersections at Chicago Avenue and Orrington Avenue within the vicinity of the site. Church Street provides two lanes with metered parallel parking generally provided on the north side of the road and a barrier-protected bike lane on the north side for eastbound traffic (west of Chicago Avenue). At its intersection with Orrington Avenue, Church Street provides one exclusive left- turn lane and two exclusive through lanes.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 7 E

NU AY

W E - M E

AV ON

AN

M

R

E

C

H I

S L Y B

M U

P LLE

A

Y ON

M T R

B A S M AY M BR W CHU I - VAN L

E RC H E ON ST B REET M M ON E- WAY M M B

E

NG

I

NU

E AND

M T

S AV

, M

NG

ON I

T PP Y

O

T

NG S I LLE E

15 MIN A P B ,

RR NG NU L S / O I E K N P R

A AV P M M NO B AGO C M I B H M C DAV SITE IS M P M B 30 ST REET M B

ON E- WAY 30

M

20 MIN M M LIMIT

M

M

PROJECT: TITLE: Chicago Ave/Davis Street Mixed-Use Existing Street Characteristics Job No: 14-256

Chicago, Illinois Figure: 3

8

Orrington Avenue is a northeast-southwest road restricted to one-way northbound travel only. At its signalized intersections with Davis Street and Church Street, Orrington Avenue provides one exclusive turn lane and two exclusive through lanes. Between Davis Street and Church Street, metered diagonal parking is provided on the west side of the road while parking is prohibited on the east side of the road due to the access to the underground parking garage located at 1701 Orrington Avenue.

Sherman Avenue is a north-south road restricted to one-way southbound travel only. At its intersection with Davis Street, Sherman Avenue provides two exclusive through lanes and two- exclusive right-turn lanes. It should be noted that no right-turn on red is allowed at this intersection. Metered parallel parking is generally provided on both sides of Sherman Avenue.

In addition to these roadways, a two-way, 18-foot north-south alley is provided midblock between Chicago Avenue and Orrington Avenue which intersects both Davis Street and Church Street and extends from Lake Street to Clark Street. The alley provides access to the Evanston Library surface lot and to the 1603 Orrington Avenue parking lot.

Alternative Modes of Transportation

Accessibility to and from the Evanston central business district is enhanced by the alternative modes of transportation serving the area as summarized below. Figure 4 shows a map of the public transportation serving the area.

Public Transportation. The area is served by several modes of public transportation including Metra commuter rail, CTA rapid transit service and two bus lines. The following summarizes the rail lines providing service to the area.

• The Metra Union Pacific/North Line (UP-N) has a local stop at Benson Avenue just north of Davis Street, which is located approximately two to three blocks west of Chicago Avenue. This line provides daily service between Ogilvie Transportation Center in Chicago and Kenosha, Wisconsin.

• The CTA Purple Transit Line has a local stop at Benson Avenue just north of Davis Street and is located two to three blocks west of Chicago Avenue. This line provides daily service between the Linden Station in Wilmette and the Howard Station on the border of Chicago and Evanston. In addition, weekday peak period express service is provided between the Howard Station and downtown Chicago Loop.

The following bus routes serve the immediate area. Several other bus routes have stops that are within walking distance of the site.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 9

SITE

Public Transportation Available Figure 4

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 10

• Route Number 205 Chicago/Golf runs mostly along Chicago Avenue, Davis Street, Church Street and Golf Road between the Howard Street rapid transit station and the Cook County Courthouse in Skokie. Service is provided Monday through Friday.

• Route Number 201 Central/Ridge generally runs along Ridge Road, Sheridan Avenue and Central Street with stops including the Old Orchard Shopping Center, Central and Davis Purple Line Stations, and the Howard Red Line Station. Service is provided weekdays from 5:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. and Saturdays from 9:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M.

Non-Motorized Transportation Systems. All of the streets within the immediate area have sidewalks on both sides of the street. Standard crosswalks are provided on all approaches of the studied intersections except for the west approach at the intersection of Davis Street and Sherman Avenue. Pedestrian signals are also provided at all signalized intersections, but none provide pedestrian countdown timers.

According to the City of Evanston’s Area Bike Map, Chicago Avenue and Davis Street are designated bike routes. In addition, Davis Street and Church Street provide barrier-protected bike lanes within the vicinity of the site.

Car-Sharing Transportation Availability. Multiple vehicles are located within walking distance of the site, including two vehicles near the intersection of Davis Street with Benson Avenue and single vehicles near the intersections of Clark Street with Orrington Avenue and Chicago Avenue with Church Street.

Existing Traffic Volumes

In order to determine current vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle conditions within the study area, KLOA, Inc. utilized peak period transportation counts at the following intersections.

• Davis Street and Chicago Avenue (Tuesday, January 31, 2017) • Davis Street and Orrington Avenue (Tuesday, November 18, 2014) • Davis Street and Sherman Avenue (Tuesday, November 18, 2014) • Church Street and Chicago Avenue (Tuesday, January 31, 2017) • Church Street and Orrington Avenue (Tuesday, November 18, 2014) • Davis Street and North-South Alley (Tuesday, November 18, 2014) • Church Street and North-South Alley (Tuesday, November 18, 2014)

It should be noted that the traffic counts at the other intersections performed in 2014 were adjusted to reflect more recent counts (2017) as well as traffic counts conducted on Sherman Avenue and Grove Street (Thursday, March 9, 2017). The traffic counts were conducted during the weekday morning (7:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M.) and evening (4:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.) peak periods. The results of the traffic counts showed that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic occurs from 8:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. and the weekday evening peak hour of traffic occurs from 5:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the existing vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle peak hour volumes.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 11 E N

AN AY

W

- M

NU E R E NOT TO SCALE ON E H AV S

CHU RC ST H REET

AY )

W 105 )

- 12 0 ( E 344 (172 (

) ON 1 ON ( 404 E- 12 ) WAY

)

) ) ) 18 384 ( 198 151 336 (23 ( ( ) 25

(509 (

141 39 ) 201 49 (23 15 ) ) ) 3 ( 11 (

2 56 (79 30 192 ) (182 130 ) (271 )

) ) Y S

) / ) 39 242 ( ( N

LLE 217 305 (

( A 85

409 141 99

379

40 (376 ) (77 ) )

106 67 ( (134 306 )

(374 47 ) SITE

) ) ) 38 ) (58 79 364 ) 184 483 ( ( ( 128

( (441 ) 113 96 228 157 ) 24

0 (31 ( ON ) E- 150 1 WAY ON (170 E T 24 ) (30 ) NU NG I E

RR AV ) DAV O ) S IS 145 T ( REET 250 (

156

E 469

AGO

NU C I E

H

C AV

LEGEND

00 - AM PEAK HOUR (8:00-9:00 AM)

(00) - PM PEAK HOUR (5:00-6:00 PM)

PROJECT: TITLE: Chicago Ave/Davis Street Mixed-Use Existing Traffic Volumes Job No: 14-256

Chicago, Illinois Figure: 5

12 E N

AN AY

W

- M

NU E R E NOT TO SCALE ON E H AV S

C HU 44 S RC (19 T H ) 4 REET ) AY 104

W 8 (

- ( ) 5) E 11 141 ( ON ON E- 43 WAY 44 (5 92 2 ) ) ) ( 11 230 ( ) 6 13 (8 ( 1 )

7 )

8 (

) 2 4 ( 67 5 4) ( 97 ) (136 (214 ) 4 ) 4 393 ( (6 0 ) ) (0)

156 120 (

110 92 (122 )

) Y S 0 / (

N LLE 2 )

2 A ) ( 0 (

4 8 ) 143

( 82 (136 ) 99

73

(98 1 ) (0 74 ) SITE (121 ) 75 ) 5 ( ( ) 102 3 ) ( 2

1 )

5 (

) 3 2 50 54 ( ) (119 (106 ) 5 ) 0 185 ( ON ( 0 ) ) E T

108 123 ( NU NG 6 I E (0 80 ) 75 RR (105 ON AV E- ) WAY DAV O I ST S REET

)

2 ( E

6 AGO

NU C I E

H

C AV

LEGEND

00 - AM PEAK HOUR (8:00-9:00 AM)

(00) - PM PEAK HOUR (5:00-6:00 PM)

PROJECT: TITLE:

Chicago Ave/Davis Street Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Mixed-Use Traffic Volumes Job No: 14-256 Chicago, Illinois Figure: 6

13

3. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed Development

The following provides a description of the proposed development with respect to the surrounding area, phasing of the project, and how traffic will be able to access the site by way of the existing street system. To evaluate the impact the proposed development will have on the area street system, it is necessary to quantify the number of vehicle trips that will be generated during the weekday morning and evening peak hours and to determine the directional distribution from where these vehicle trips will approach and depart the site.

Proposed Plan and Phasing

As proposed, the plan calls for a 33-story mixed-use development containing approximately 318 apartment units, 7,405 square feet of retail space, and two ATM drive-through lanes. A portion of the retail space will be located within the existing two-story University building on the east side of the site. In addition, a 176-space parking garage which will occupy on the second through fifth floors.

Further details of the development will be discussed below.

Development Access

Access to the proposed parking garage will be provided at the northwest corner of the building off the public alley located midblock between Chicago Avenue and Orrington Avenue, allowing access to and from both Davis Street and Church Street. The garage access will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with outbound movements under stop sign control. Warning devices should be provided at the garage access to warn pedestrians and vehicles of exiting traffic. The ATM drive-through lanes will be located beneath the building and accessed via a one-way access drive with inbound access on Davis Street and outbound access onto the alley with outbound movements under stop sign control. Mirrors should be provided, if feasible, to improve sight lines for exiting traffic.

Pedestrian Access

Residential pedestrian access will be provided via a residential lobby located off Davis Street. Retail access for pedestrians will be provided on both Chicago Avenue and Davis Street and an elevator lobby will be provided at the southwest corner of the development for use by retail patrons.

Truck Loading

Truck loading will also occur along the alley between the parking garage and outbound drive- through access drives.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 14

Directional Distribution

The directions of approach and departure of the future development-generated traffic were estimated based on existing travel patterns. The estimates incorporate traffic counts as well as the expected routes due to one-way restrictions in the area and the proposed access to the development. Figure 7 illustrates the directional distribution of traffic.

Development Traffic Generation

The volume of traffic generated by a development is based on the type of land use and the size of the development. The number of peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be generated by the proposed development is based on vehicle trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation, 9th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE).

It should be noted that the ITE traffic estimates are based on suburban rates where the primary mode of transportation is the automobile. Given the location of the proposed site within the central business district and its proximity to alternative modes of transportation, the number of additional vehicle trips generated by the residential development will be reduced. A review of the U.S. Census data for tracts in the area showed that approximately 50 percent of workers in the area drive a car to work. Therefore, the residential trips were reduced by 50 percent to account for the workers that will use means of transportation other than the automobile to commute to work.

The trips generated by the retail uses were also reduced by 60 percent to account for alternative modes of transportation and location within the central business district of Evanston where many trips will be captured from pedestrians in the area. Furthermore, additional traffic was generated for the proposed ATM drive-through lanes. However, it should be noted that traffic to the existing drive- through was not removed from the roadway network. Table 1 summarizes the total trips anticipated with the development during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 15

Table 1 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Weekday Morning Weekday Evening Peak Hour Peak Hour Land Use/Density In Out Total In Out Total Apartments – 318 units (LUC 220)1

Gross Trips: 32 128 160 125 68 193

Less 50% Reduction: -16 -64 -80 -63 -34 -97

Total Residential Trips: 16 64 80 62 34 96

Retail – 7,405 s.f. (LUC 826)2

Gross Trips: 3 2 5 17 22 39

Less 60% Reduction: -2 -1 -3 -10 -13 -23

Total Retail Trips: 1 1 2 7 9 16

ATM Drive-Through – 2 Lanes 5 5 10 10 10 20

Total Development Trips 22 70 92 79 53 132 1 Trip generation reduced by 50 percent to account for alternative modes of transportation. 2 Trip generation reduced by 60 percent to account for alternative modes of transportation and interaction.

The estimated weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system in accordance with the previously described directional distribution, as illustrated in Figure 8.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 16 E N

AN AY

W

- M

NU E R E ) NOT TO SCALE ON E % H AV

S 10 ( CHU RC ST H REET AY

W 25 - % E ON ON E- WAY %

30

)

%

25 (

(10 %) Y S /

N LLE

A

(20 %)

SITE

ON E -W ON AY E T

NU NG I E 10 RR % AV DAV O I ST S ) REET

) %

% 15

( E

AGO 20

( NU C % I E

H 35 C AV

LEGEND

00% - INBOUND PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

(00%) - OUTBOUND PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

PROJECT: TITLE: Chicago Ave/Davis Street Mixed-Use Estimated Directional Distribution Job No: 14-256

Chicago, Illinois Figure: 7

17 E N

AN AY

W

- M

NU E R E NOT TO SCALE ON E H AV S

CHU RC ST H REET AY W

- 5

E ( 19) ON ON E- WAY

) 5 5 ( ) (19 11 ) 24 (

7

)

) 27 ( 19 ( 17 (14 5 32 ) 6 (5) 32 9 (22 (8 31 ) ) Y (21 S ) /

N LLE

) A

50 (

12 3 (5) 2 (5) 11 (11) 11 ( 10) 11 (5) 22 ( 21) SITE

)

) 5 24 ( ( 8 10 ( ) 12 7 (50 9 )

ON E -W ON AY E T 2 ) (8 NU ) NG I E 26 (

RR AV ) 33 DAV O 28 S IS ( TR EET 8 12 (50 ) E

AGO

NU C I E

H

C AV

LEGEND

00 - AM PEAK HOUR (8:00-9:00 AM)

(00) - PM PEAK HOUR (5:00-6:00 PM)

PROJECT: TITLE: Chicago Ave/Davis Street Mixed-Use Estimated Site Traffic Assignment Job No: 14-256

Chicago, Illinois Figure: 8

18

4. Projected Traffic Conditions

The total projected traffic volumes include the existing traffic volumes, the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development, and the traffic estimated to be generated by planned developments in the nearby area.

Planned Developments

To account for other growth in the area, the study also reviewed proposed and/or planned developments near the study area. Vehicle trips for the following projects were estimated and included in the projected volumes.

• 1571 Maple Avenue is to be located just south of Davis Street between Maple Avenue and Elmwood Avenue. The proposed development will contain 101 apartments with ground floor retail. The majority of parking for the development will be located within the public parking garage at 1800 Maple Avenue.

• 1454 Sherman Avenue is a mixed-use development to be located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Sherman Avenue with Lake Street. The proposed development will include 287 apartment units and 9,600 square feet of retail.

• 1621-29 Chicago Avenue is a mixed-use development to be located on the east side of Chicago Avenue south of Church Street. The proposed development will include 279 apartment units and 3,691 square feet of retail.

Other Area Growth

To account for any additional increase in traffic from unknown developments outside of the study area, an ambient growth factor of 0.5 percent per year was applied to the study area over a five year period to represent Year 2022 conditions.

Total Projected Traffic Volumes

The existing traffic volumes were increased by 3.0 percent and combined with the traffic from other developments in the area and the peak hour traffic volumes generated by the development to determine the total projected traffic volumes, shown in Figure 9. It should also be noted that in order to present a conservative (worst-case) analysis, the existing traffic generated by the current uses on the subject site, including the bank drive-through, were not removed from the roadway network. Furthermore, in order to account for the increase in population in the study area, all bicycle and pedestrian volumes were increased by 10 percent at all intersections.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 19 E N

AN AY

W

- M

NU E R E NOT TO SCALE ON E H AV S

CHU RC ST H REET

AY )

W 108 )

- 12 0 (

E ( 364 176 (

) ON 1 ON ( 455 E- 12 ) WAY

)

) ) ) 19 433 ( 214 350 (24 ( 155 ) 26 ( (544 (

45 ) 217 15 156 (42 50 ) ) ) 3 (

38 ( 2 74 (95 203 )

63 (192 148 ) (307 )

) ) Y ) S

) / 44 267 ( ( N

327 LLE ( 222

( A 92

448 148 101

399

52 (397 (89 ) )

120 (142 335 ) (405 ) SITE

) ) ) ) 81 ( 217 ( 513 136 5 ( ( ( 10) 116 429 110 (566 261 162 ) 27

ON (41 E- 156 ) WAY ON (182 E T 25 ) (31 ) )

NU NG 93 I E (

RR AV ) 80 DAV O ) S IS 177 T ( 271 R 50 ( EET

(108 379 ) 168 (458 ) E 485

AGO

) NU C 0 I ( E

1 H

C AV

LEGEND

00 - AM PEAK HOUR (8:00-9:00 AM)

(00) - PM PEAK HOUR (5:00-6:00 PM)

PROJECT: TITLE: Chicago Ave/Davis Street Mixed-Use Total Projected Traffic Volumes Job No: 14-256

Chicago, Illinois Figure: 9

20

5. Traffic Analysis and Recommendations

Traffic analyses were performed to determine the operation of the existing street system, evaluate the impact of the proposed development, and determine the ability of the existing street system to accommodate projected traffic demands. Analyses were performed for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for all intersections within the study area for both the existing traffic volumes and the total projected traffic volumes upon development of the site.

The traffic analyses were performed using the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6th Edition and modeled/analyzed using Synchro 10.0 software. The analyses for the traffic signal-controlled intersections were accomplished using existing cycle lengths and phasings to determine the average overall vehicle delay, volume-to-capacity ratios, and levels of service. The analyses for the signalized intersections determine the average control delay to vehicles at an intersection. The methodology analyzes each intersection approach controlled by a traffic signal or stop sign and considers traffic volumes and lane characteristics for all approaches.

The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections are included in the Appendix of this report.

A summary of the traffic analysis results for the existing traffic volumes and projected traffic volumes are presented in Tables 2 through 7. A discussion of the intersections and recommendations follows. The capacity analysis reports are included in the Appendix.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 21

Table 2 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – DAVIS STREET WITH CHICAGO AVENUE -SIGNALIZED Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Peak Hour Overall L T R L T R L T T R Weekday

Morning B – 16.2 Peak Hour C – 20.7 B – 14.3 B – 17.1 Weekday Existing

Conditions Evening B – 18.1 Peak Hour C – 20.9 B – 12.4 C – 20.6

Weekday

Morning B – 16.7 Peak Hour C – 20.8 B – 14.8 B – 17.6 Weekday Projected Conditions B Evening B – 18.9 Peak Hour C – 21.2 B – 12.9 C – 21.7 Delay is measured in seconds.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 22

Table 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – DAVIS STREET WITH ORRINGTON AVENUE – SIGNALIZED Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Peak Hour Overall L T R T R L T L T R Weekday B – 11.9 B – 14.4 Morning C – 21.1 Peak Hour C – 26.1 B – 13.4 Weekday B – 11.6 B – 14.1 Existing

Conditions Evening C – 22.8 Peak Hour C – 26.7 B – 13.2

Weekday B – 12.0 B – 14.5 Morning C – 22.5 Peak Hour C – 28.1 B – 13.4 Weekday B – 12.0 B – 14.2 Projected

Conditions Evening C – 24.2 Peak Hour C – 28.6 B – 13.4 Delay is measured in seconds.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 23

Table 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – DAVIS STREET WITH SHERMAN AVENUE - SIGNALIZED Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Peak Hour Overall L T R L T L T R T R Weekday B – 14.3 B – 14.3 Morning A – 8.7 Peak Hour A – 5.4 B – 14.3 itions Weekday B – 15.2 B – 15.3 Existing

Cond Evening A – 10.0 Peak Hour A – 4.1 B – 15.2

Weekday B – 14.3 B – 14.4 Morning A – 8.5 Peak Hour A – 5.3 B – 14.4 Weekday B – 15.3 B – 15.4 Projected

Conditions Evening A – 10.0 Peak Hour A – 3.9 B – 15.3 Delay is measured in seconds.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 24

Table 5 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – CHURCH STREET WITH CHICAGO AVENUE - SIGNALIZED Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Peak Hour Overall L T R L T R T R L T Weekday

Morning A – 9.0 Peak Hour B – 17.6 A – 1.9 A – 10.0 Weekday Existing

Conditions Evening B – 15.2 Peak Hour C – 24.7 A – 3.5 B – 10.9

Weekday

Morning A – 9.8 Peak Hour B – 18.8 A – 2.6 B – 10.1 Weekday Projected

Conditions Evening B – 17.2 Peak Hour C – 28.6 A – 4.3 B – 11.2 Delay is measured in seconds.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 25

Table 6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – CHURCH STREET WITH ORRINGTON AVENUE - SIGNALIZED Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Peak Hour Overall L T L T R T R L T R Weekday A – 2.0 A – 8.2 B – 18.6 A – 6.4 Morning A – 9.3 Peak Hour A – 6.7 B – 15.5 Weekday A – 2.7 A – 8.4 B – 19.2 A – 9.4 Existing

Conditions Evening A – 9.8 Peak Hour A – 6.7 B – 15.0

Weekday A – 2.0 A – 8.3 B – 18.8 A – 6.4 Morning A – 9.5 Peak Hour A – 6.8 B – 15.8 Weekday A – 3.5 A – 8.7 B – 19.4 B – 12.7 Projected

Conditions Evening B – 10.7 Peak Hour A – 7.2 B – 16.6 Delay is measured in seconds.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 26

Table 7 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Weekday Morning Weekday Evening Peak Hour Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Existing Conditions Davis Street and North-South Alley B 10.7 B 12.2

Church Street and North-South Alley B 11.4 B 14.6 Projected Conditions Davis Street and North-South Alley B 12.1 B 13.4

Church Street and North-South Alley B 11.9 C 15.2 LOS - Level of Service Delay - Measured in seconds

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 27

Discussion and Recommendations

The results of the capacity analyses show that all of the signalized intersections within the study area are currently operating at a good level of service, primarily due to the one-way nature of the majority of the roads. With the addition of the development traffic and the growth projected in the area, all of the intersections are projected to continue to operate at an acceptable level of service, except for the intersection of Davis Street and Chicago Avenue, which is discussed below. The results of the analysis indicate that the roadway system can sufficiently accommodate the additional traffic to be generated by the proposed development. This is reflected in the results of the capacity analysis, which shows small increases in average delays.

Davis Street and Chicago Avenue

Results of the capacity analyses for the intersection of Davis Street and Chicago Avenue show that this intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) B during the morning and evening peak hours. Due to the absence of a northbound left-turn lane, it was observed that some queuing can occur, but this lane generally clears within one cycle. Under projected conditions, the overall intersection level of service and the northbound approach level of service will continue to operate at good levels of service. However, observations of the simulation runs show that queuing for the northbound left-turn movements will increase. This increase in queuing is due to the addition of site traffic approaching the site from the south on Chicago Avenue. In order to mitigate this impact, consideration should be given to providing two additional seconds to the northbound left-turn phase, which will reduce queues without significantly impacting the operation of the southbound movements.

Site Access

As proposed, access to the garage will be provided at the public alley, which will provide access to Davis Street and Church Street. Both intersections of the alley with Davis Street and Church Street will continue to operate at acceptable conditions during the morning and evening peak hours and therefore, will be able to accommodate the increase in traffic due to the site.

Access to the garage and ATM drive-through will also adequately accommodate the projected site traffic during the morning and evening peak hours. Further, stacking for approximately six vehicles will be provided, which will be adequate for two ATM lanes. In order to improve sight lines for vehicles at the access drives, convex mirrors, and other similar safety features such as warning devices should be provided.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 28

Transportation Sustainability Recommendations

The following summarizes suggested measures to be implemented by the development and/or recommendations to further minimize the impact of the development, foster alternative modes of transportation other than the automobile, and to enhance pedestrian/bicycle safety.

• Consideration should be given to providing car-sharing vehicles within the parking garage or in the vicinity of the site.

• Indoor bike storage is to be provided within the development. Bike racks will also be provided near the retail access.

• Pedestrian countdown timers should be provided at all signalized intersections within the study area.

• All approaches of all intersections within the study area should be striped to provide high- visibility continental crosswalks.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 29

6. Conclusion

This report summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) to assess the impact of the mixed-use development at 601 – 605 Davis Street in Evanston, Illinois. As proposed, the development is to consist of a total of approximately 318 apartment units, 7,405 square feet of retail, two ATM drive-through lanes, and a 176-space parking garage. Based on the preceding analyses and recommendations, the following conclusions were made:

• Given the location of the site within the central business district and its proximity to alternative modes of transportation, the number of vehicles trips generated by the development will be reduced.

• The existing roadway system can sufficiently accommodate the traffic to be generated by the proposed development.

• Consideration should be given to providing additional green time to the northbound left- turn phase at the intersection of Davis Street and Chicago Avenue in order to reduce queuing of northbound traffic.

• Access to the development parking garage off the public alley will adequately accommodate the site-generated traffic.

• The two-lane ATM drive-through facility will adequately accommodate the traffic volumes generated.

• Pedestrian countdown timers should be provided at all signalized intersections in the study area.

• High-visibility continental crosswalks should be provided at all approaches of every intersection within the study area.

601 – 605 Davis Street Evanston, Illinois 30

Appendix Traffic Counts Demographic Data Level of Service Table Capacity Analyses Reports

Traffic Counts

Evanston, IL Weather: Cool and Dry 11/11/13 Davis St and Chicago Ave 12:26:52 Thursday November 7, 2013

TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 15-Minute Counts: All Vehicles - by Mvmt

Intersection # 7 davis/chicago ======Begin N-Approach E-Approach S-Approach W-Approach Int Time RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total ======700 11 47 0 4 6 1 0 66 11 0 0 0 146 715 17 30 0 4 10 2 0 79 13 0 0 0 155 730 13 41 0 3 5 3 0 96 16 0 0 0 177 745 21 52 0 3 5 2 0 96 24 0 0 0 203 800 19 41 0 2 13 2 0 91 25 0 0 0 193 815 18 64 0 5 12 2 0 112 20 0 0 0 233 830 16 52 0 8 12 9 0 105 35 0 0 0 237 845 18 57 0 0 17 3 0 94 23 0 0 0 212 ------1600 16 110 0 3 7 4 0 80 16 0 0 0 236 1615 19 123 0 2 5 6 0 65 14 0 0 0 234 1630 22 111 0 3 8 5 0 73 38 0 0 0 260 1645 17 124 0 6 18 5 0 92 24 0 0 0 286 1700 29 132 0 4 14 9 0 56 38 0 0 0 282 1715 28 128 0 4 11 6 0 59 25 0 0 0 261 1730 23 126 0 3 8 12 0 75 33 0 0 0 280 1745 18 114 0 6 7 7 0 76 21 0 0 0 249 ======Total 305 1352 0 60 158 78 0 1315 376 0 0 0 3644

TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 15-Minute Counts: All Vehicles - Totals

Intersection # 7 davis/chicago ======Begin Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time N E S W N E S W Total ======700 58 11 77 0 70 0 48 28 146 715 47 16 92 0 83 0 32 40 155 730 54 11 112 0 99 0 44 34 177 745 73 10 120 0 99 0 54 50 203 800 60 17 116 0 93 0 43 57 193 815 82 19 132 0 117 0 66 50 233 830 68 29 140 0 113 0 61 63 237 845 75 20 117 0 94 0 60 58 212 ------1600 126 14 96 0 83 0 114 39 236 1615 142 13 79 0 67 0 129 38 234 1630 133 16 111 0 76 0 116 68 260 1645 141 29 116 0 98 0 129 59 286 1700 161 27 94 0 60 0 141 81 282 1715 156 21 84 0 63 0 134 64 261 1730 149 23 108 0 78 0 138 64 280 1745 132 20 97 0 82 0 121 46 249 ======Total 1657 296 1691 0 1375 0 1430 839 3644 Evanston, IL Weather: Cool and Dry 11/11/13 Davis St and Chicago Ave 12:26:52 Thursday November 7, 2013

TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60-Minute Volumes: by Movement

Intersection # 7 davis/chicago ======Begin N-Approach E-Approach S-Approach W-Approach Int Time RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total ======700 62 170 0 14 26 8 0 337 64 0 0 0 681 715 70 164 0 12 33 9 0 362 78 0 0 0 728 730 71 198 0 13 35 9 0 395 85 0 0 0 806 745 74 209 0 18 42 15 0 404 104 0 0 0 866 800 71 214 0 15 54 16 0 402 103 0 0 0 875 815 52 173 0 13 41 14 0 311 78 0 0 0 682* 830 34 109 0 8 29 12 0 199 58 0 0 0 449* 845 18 57 0 0 17 3 0 94 23 0 0 0 212* ------1600 74 468 0 14 38 20 0 310 92 0 0 0 1016 1615 87 490 0 15 45 25 0 286 114 0 0 0 1062 1630 96 495 0 17 51 25 0 280 125 0 0 0 1089 1645 97 510 0 17 51 32 0 282 120 0 0 0 1109 1700 98 500 0 17 40 34 0 266 117 0 0 0 1072 1715 69 368 0 13 26 25 0 210 79 0 0 0 790* 1730 41 240 0 9 15 19 0 151 54 0 0 0 529* 1745 18 114 0 6 7 7 0 76 21 0 0 0 249* ======

TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60-Minute Volumes: Appr/Exit Totals

Intersection # 7 davis/chicago ======Begin Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time N E S W N E S W Total ======700 232 48 401 0 351 0 178 152 681 715 234 54 440 0 374 0 173 181 728 730 269 57 480 0 408 0 207 191 806 745 283 75 508 0 422 0 224 220 866 800 285 85 505 0 417 0 230 228 875 815 225 68 389 0 324 0 187 171 682* 830 143 49 257 0 207 0 121 121 449* 845 75 20 117 0 94 0 60 58 212* ------1600 542 72 402 0 324 0 488 204 1016 1615 577 85 400 0 301 0 515 246 1062 1630 591 93 405 0 297 0 520 272 1089 1645 607 100 402 0 299 0 542 268 1109 1700 598 91 383 0 283 0 534 255 1072 1715 437 64 289 0 223 0 393 174 790* 1730 281 43 205 0 160 0 259 110 529* 1745 132 20 97 0 82 0 121 46 249* ======Study Name Davis/Orrington/Sherman Start Date Tuesday, November 18, 2014 7:00 AM End Date Tuesday, November 18, 2014 6:15 PM Site Code

Report Summary

Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Northwestbound Southwestbound Crosswalk Time Period Class. I O L T HR I O I O HL TRIOHL BL R I O I O Total Pedestrians Total Peak 1 Lights 0 477 28 274 101 403 0 0 138 0 107 97 204 0 3 106 176 285 0 0 277 892 W 99 99 Specified Period % 0% 98% 97% 98% 95% 97% 0% 0% 95% 0% 94% 98% 96% 0% 100% 98% 96% 97% 0% 0% 96% 97% 100% 8:00 AM ‐ 9:00 AM Buses 0 614050 0 10011001230 0 2 9E 3 3 One Hour Peak % 0% 1% 3% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 100% 8:00 AM ‐ 9:00 AM Single‐Unit Trucks 0 403470 0 60617000110 0 5 15S 7373 % 0% 1% 0% 1% 4% 2% 0% 0% 4% 0% 5% 1% 3% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 100% Articulated Trucks 0 000110 0 00000000110 0 2 2N 1818 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 100% Bicycles on Road 0 100000 0 10101001450 0 4 6SE7575 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 100% Total 0 488 29 281 106 416 0 0 146 0 114 99 213 0 3 108 184 295 0 0 290 924 NE 82 82 PHF 0 0.9 0.91 0.85 0.78 0.87 0 0 0.94 0 0.92 0.77 0.87 0 0.38 0.87 0.74 0.81 0 0 0.79 0.87 100% Approach % 0% 53% 45% 0% 0% 16% 23% 0% 32% 0% 0% 31% 350 350

Peak 2 Lights 0 623 61 340 134 535 0 0 364 0 293 216 509 0 10 67 123 200 0 0 257 1244 W 143 143 Specified Period % 0% 99% 95% 98% 100% 98% 0% 0% 99% 0% 99% 100% 99% 0% 100% 100% 98% 99% 0% 0% 99% 99% 100% 5:00 PM ‐ 6:00 PM Buses 0 706060 0 00011000000 0 0 7E 2 2 One Hour Peak % 0% 1% 0% 2% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 100% 5:00 PM ‐ 6:00 PM Single‐Unit Trucks 0 121030 0 30101000110 0 1 5S 9898 % 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% Articulated Trucks 0 111020 0 20101000000 0 0 3N 4141 % 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% Bicycles on Road 0 000000 0 00000000220 0 2 2SE102102 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 100% Total 0 632 64 348 134 546 0 0 369 0 295 217 512 0 10 67 126 203 0 0 260 1261 NE 136 136 PHF 0 0.95 0.64 0.91 0.8 0.9 0 0 0.91 0 0.87 0.92 0.96 0 0.83 0.73 0.77 0.76 0 0 0.88 0.98 100% Approach % 0% 50% 43% 0% 0% 29% 41% 0% 16% 0% 0% 21% 522 522 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Count Name: Chicago/Church Site Code: Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 Start Date: 11/18/2014 (847)518-9990 Page No: 1

Turning Movement Data Church Street Church Street Chicago Avenue Chicago Avenue Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Peds App. Total U-Turn Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:00 AM 3 20 16 6 39 3 0 0 61 8 6 69 0 0 30 2 30 138 7:15 AM 12 20 21 7 53 7 0 0 67 4 7 71 0 4 32 9 36 160 7:30 AM 10 33 14 10 57 6 0 0 91 9 10 100 0 3 35 8 38 195 7:45 AM 9 29 27 16 65 11 0 0 83 14 13 97 0 4 31 10 35 197 Hourly Total 34 102 78 39 214 27 0 0 302 35 36 337 0 11 128 29 139 690 8:00 AM 14 39 24 25 77 18 0 0 89 11 12 100 0 3 46 12 49 226 8:15 AM 15 44 36 54 95 16 0 0 105 15 22 120 0 2 52 12 54 269 8:30 AM 14 51 46 28 111 12 0 0 81 25 17 106 0 2 64 17 66 283 8:45 AM 15 49 49 48 113 22 0 0 80 10 17 90 0 1 55 12 56 259 Hourly Total 58 183 155 155 396 68 0 0 355 61 68 416 0 8 217 53 225 1037 *** BREAK *** ------4:00 PM 14 34 75 42 123 13 0 0 61 5 18 66 0 5 92 21 97 286 4:15 PM 11 34 74 40 119 18 0 0 60 11 25 71 0 2 90 22 92 282 4:30 PM 16 47 59 52 122 24 0 1 65 12 33 78 0 6 88 17 94 294 4:45 PM 18 37 86 73 141 19 0 0 89 15 22 104 0 4 109 26 113 358 Hourly Total 59 152 294 207 505 74 0 1 275 43 98 319 0 17 379 86 396 1220 5:00 PM 22 58 85 106 165 35 0 0 63 13 38 76 0 7 112 28 119 360 5:15 PM 15 54 88 85 157 33 0 0 78 10 34 88 0 3 116 28 119 364 5:30 PM 19 43 83 60 145 26 0 0 72 14 30 86 0 8 105 25 113 344 5:45 PM 16 52 76 61 144 27 0 0 76 14 32 90 0 2 95 34 97 331 Hourly Total 72 207 332 312 611 121 0 0 289 51 134 340 0 20 428 115 448 1399 Grand Total 223 644 859 713 1726 290 0 1 1221 190 336 1412 0 56 1152 283 1208 4346 Approach % 12.9 37.3 49.8 - - - - 0.1 86.5 13.5 - - 0.0 4.6 95.4 - - - Total % 5.1 14.8 19.8 - 39.7 - 0.0 0.0 28.1 4.4 - 32.5 0.0 1.3 26.5 - 27.8 - Lights 207 631 833 - 1671 - 0 1 1161 184 - 1346 0 55 1088 - 1143 4160 % Lights 92.8 98.0 97.0 - 96.8 - - 100.0 95.1 96.8 - 95.3 - 98.2 94.4 - 94.6 95.7 Buses 11 1 12 - 24 - 0 0 22 1 - 23 0 0 34 - 34 81 % Buses 4.9 0.2 1.4 - 1.4 - - 0.0 1.8 0.5 - 1.6 - 0.0 3.0 - 2.8 1.9 Single-Unit Trucks 3 9 9 - 21 - 0 0 12 5 - 17 0 0 16 - 16 54 % Single-Unit Trucks 1.3 1.4 1.0 - 1.2 - - 0.0 1.0 2.6 - 1.2 - 0.0 1.4 - 1.3 1.2 Articulated Trucks 0 0 3 - 3 - 0 0 13 0 - 13 0 1 6 - 7 23 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.3 - 0.2 - - 0.0 1.1 0.0 - 0.9 - 1.8 0.5 - 0.6 0.5 Bicycles on Road 2 3 2 - 7 - 0 0 13 0 - 13 0 0 8 - 8 28 % Bicycles on Road 0.9 0.5 0.2 - 0.4 - - 0.0 1.1 0.0 - 0.9 - 0.0 0.7 - 0.7 0.6 Pedestrians - - - 713 - 290 - - - - 336 - - - - 283 - - % Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Count Name: Orrington/Church Site Code: Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 Start Date: 11/18/2014 (847)518-9990 Page No: 1

Turning Movement Data Church Street Church Street Orrington Avenue Orrington Avenue Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Start Time Left Thru Peds App. Total Peds App. Total Thru Right Peds App. Total Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:00 AM 17 46 0 63 3 0 8 4 10 12 5 0 75 7:15 AM 19 48 2 67 0 0 15 10 10 25 7 0 92 7:30 AM 9 57 7 66 4 0 16 5 17 21 9 0 87 7:45 AM 21 80 6 101 7 0 25 7 20 32 8 0 133 Hourly Total 66 231 15 297 14 0 64 26 57 90 29 0 387 8:00 AM 16 69 6 85 9 0 30 7 30 37 14 0 122 8:15 AM 31 94 1 125 7 0 32 6 19 38 10 0 163 8:30 AM 36 98 2 134 9 0 26 21 19 47 7 0 181 8:45 AM 22 103 2 125 19 0 30 15 24 45 13 0 170 Hourly Total 105 364 11 469 44 0 118 49 92 167 44 0 636 *** BREAK *** ------4:00 PM 39 98 13 137 20 0 42 30 37 72 26 0 209 4:15 PM 33 96 23 129 11 0 42 14 36 56 32 0 185 4:30 PM 46 118 15 164 14 0 27 31 35 58 35 0 222 4:45 PM 48 100 26 148 37 0 55 34 57 89 61 0 237 Hourly Total 166 412 77 578 82 0 166 109 165 275 154 0 853 5:00 PM 39 145 23 184 48 0 42 33 51 75 43 0 259 5:15 PM 34 109 23 143 23 0 52 44 60 96 42 0 239 5:30 PM 40 113 22 153 29 0 49 37 45 86 56 0 239 5:45 PM 59 118 36 177 41 0 53 37 74 90 53 0 267 Hourly Total 172 485 104 657 141 0 196 151 230 347 194 0 1004 Grand Total 509 1492 207 2001 281 0 544 335 544 879 421 0 2880 Approach % 25.4 74.6 - - - - 61.9 38.1 - - - - - Total % 17.7 51.8 - 69.5 - 0.0 18.9 11.6 - 30.5 - 0.0 - Lights 499 1436 - 1935 - 0 523 327 - 850 - 0 2785 % Lights 98.0 96.2 - 96.7 - - 96.1 97.6 - 96.7 - - 96.7 Buses 0 23 - 23 - 0 4 0 - 4 - 0 27 % Buses 0.0 1.5 - 1.1 - - 0.7 0.0 - 0.5 - - 0.9 Single-Unit Trucks 4 14 - 18 - 0 3 7 - 10 - 0 28 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.8 0.9 - 0.9 - - 0.6 2.1 - 1.1 - - 1.0 Articulated Trucks 2 1 - 3 - 0 2 1 - 3 - 0 6 % Articulated Trucks 0.4 0.1 - 0.1 - - 0.4 0.3 - 0.3 - - 0.2 Bicycles on Road 4 18 - 22 - 0 12 0 - 12 - 0 34 % Bicycles on Road 0.8 1.2 - 1.1 - - 2.2 0.0 - 1.4 - - 1.2 Pedestrians - - 207 - 281 - - - 544 - 421 - - % Pedestrians - - 100.0 - 100.0 - - - 100.0 - 100.0 - - Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Count Name: Davis/Alley Site Code: Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 Start Date: 11/18/2014 (847)518-9990 Page No: 1

Turning Movement Data Davis Street Davis Street North/South Alley North/South Alley Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Start Time Peds App. Total Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Peds App. Total U-Turn Right Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:00 AM 1 0 43 4 0 47 0 0 14 0 0 5 6 5 52 7:15 AM 0 0 58 5 0 63 1 0 9 1 0 5 11 5 69 7:30 AM 2 0 56 7 1 63 0 0 12 0 0 8 8 8 71 7:45 AM 1 0 82 7 4 89 0 0 10 0 0 16 28 16 105 Hourly Total 4 0 239 23 5 262 1 0 45 1 0 34 53 34 297 8:00 AM 0 0 93 8 0 101 1 0 8 1 0 12 10 12 114 8:15 AM 0 0 96 16 1 112 0 0 16 0 0 10 17 10 122 8:30 AM 0 0 101 8 1 109 0 0 15 0 0 15 24 15 124 8:45 AM 1 0 83 6 1 89 0 0 11 0 0 10 23 10 99 Hourly Total 1 0 373 38 3 411 1 0 50 1 0 47 74 47 459 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *** BREAK *** ------Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 PM 2 0 105 4 5 109 1 0 21 1 0 10 18 10 120 4:15 PM 1 0 105 6 0 111 1 0 28 1 0 4 29 4 116 4:30 PM 0 0 108 10 3 118 0 0 29 0 0 11 21 11 129 4:45 PM 1 0 119 9 3 128 1 2 24 3 0 6 36 6 137 Hourly Total 4 0 437 29 11 466 3 2 102 5 0 31 104 31 502 5:00 PM 1 0 110 17 0 127 0 0 31 0 0 13 35 13 140 5:15 PM 1 0 130 12 3 142 0 0 26 0 0 22 27 22 164 5:30 PM 1 0 123 18 2 141 0 0 27 0 0 20 32 20 161 5:45 PM 0 0 117 11 0 128 0 0 22 0 0 12 27 12 140 Hourly Total 3 0 480 58 5 538 0 0 106 0 0 67 121 67 605 Grand Total 12 0 1529 148 24 1677 5 2 303 7 0 179 352 179 1863 Approach % - - 91.2 8.8 - - 71.4 28.6 - - 0.0 100.0 - - - Total % - 0.0 82.1 7.9 - 90.0 0.3 0.1 - 0.4 0.0 9.6 - 9.6 - Lights - 0 1476 143 - 1619 4 2 - 6 0 177 - 177 1802 % Lights - - 96.5 96.6 - 96.5 80.0 100.0 - 85.7 - 98.9 - 98.9 96.7 Buses - 0 23 0 - 23 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 23 % Buses - - 1.5 0.0 - 1.4 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 1.2 Single-Unit Trucks - 0 25 3 - 28 0 0 - 0 0 2 - 2 30 % Single-Unit Trucks - - 1.6 2.0 - 1.7 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 1.1 - 1.1 1.6 Articulated Trucks - 0 2 2 - 4 1 0 - 1 0 0 - 0 5 % Articulated Trucks - - 0.1 1.4 - 0.2 20.0 0.0 - 14.3 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.3 Bicycles on Road - 0 3 0 - 3 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 3 % Bicycles on Road - - 0.2 0.0 - 0.2 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.2 Pedestrians 12 - - - 24 - - - 303 - - - 352 - - Evanston, IL Weather: Very Cold and Dry 11/19/14 Church St and Alley Between Orrington Ave and Chicago Ave 09:04:11 Tuesday November 18, 2014

TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 15-Minute Counts: All Vehicles - by Mvmt

Intersection # 1 church/alley ======Begin N-Approach E-Approach S-Approach W-Approach Int Time RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total ======700 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 35 0 44 715 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 6 36 4 51 730 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 10 48 1 64 745 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 12 72 2 89 800 0 1 1 0 0 0 7 1 0 8 63 1 82 815 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 12 81 3 105 830 0 0 2 0 0 0 8 1 0 9 99 7 126 845 0 0 6 0 0 0 9 0 0 10 98 7 130 ------1600 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 1 0 5 107 8 128 1615 0 0 10 0 0 0 5 1 0 6 101 4 127 1630 0 0 10 0 0 0 2 1 0 16 121 10 160 1645 0 0 5 0 0 0 13 2 0 6 77 3 106 1700 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 93 4 110 1715 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 126 6 136 1730 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 121 9 140 1745 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 3 0 9 107 4 133 ======Total 0 3 54 0 0 0 77 11 0 128 1385 73 1731

TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 15-Minute Counts: All Vehicles - Totals

Intersection # 1 church/alley ======Begin Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time N E S W N E S W Total ======700 1 0 3 40 0 38 6 0 44 715 2 0 3 46 4 41 6 0 51 730 0 0 5 59 2 52 10 0 64 745 1 0 2 86 2 74 13 0 89 800 2 0 8 72 2 71 9 0 82 815 3 0 6 96 3 90 12 0 105 830 2 0 9 115 8 109 9 0 126 845 6 0 9 115 7 113 10 0 130 ------1600 3 0 5 120 9 114 5 0 128 1615 10 0 6 111 5 116 6 0 127 1630 10 0 3 147 11 133 16 0 160 1645 5 0 15 86 5 95 6 0 106 1700 2 0 2 106 4 97 9 0 110 1715 0 0 1 135 6 127 3 0 136 1730 7 0 1 132 9 129 2 0 140 1745 3 0 10 120 7 117 9 0 133 ======Total 57 0 88 1586 84 1516 131 0 1731 Evanston, IL Weather: Very Cold and Dry 11/19/14 Church St and Alley Between Orrington Ave and Chicago Ave 09:04:11 Tuesday November 18, 2014

TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60-Minute Volumes: by Movement

Intersection # 1 church/alley ======Begin N-Approach E-Approach S-Approach W-Approach Int Time RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total ======700 0 2 2 0 0 0 12 1 0 33 191 7 248 715 0 2 3 0 0 0 16 2 0 36 219 8 286 730 0 2 4 0 0 0 19 2 0 42 264 7 340 745 0 2 6 0 0 0 23 2 0 41 315 13 402 800 0 1 12 0 0 0 30 2 0 39 341 18 443 815 0 0 11 0 0 0 23 1 0 31 278 17 361* 830 0 0 8 0 0 0 17 1 0 19 197 14 256* 845 0 0 6 0 0 0 9 0 0 10 98 7 130* ------1600 0 0 28 0 0 0 24 5 0 33 406 25 521 1615 0 0 27 0 0 0 22 4 0 37 392 21 503 1630 0 0 17 0 0 0 18 3 0 34 417 23 512 1645 0 0 14 0 0 0 17 2 0 20 417 22 492 1700 0 0 12 0 0 0 11 3 0 23 447 23 519 1715 0 0 10 0 0 0 9 3 0 14 354 19 409* 1730 0 0 10 0 0 0 8 3 0 11 228 13 273* 1745 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 3 0 9 107 4 133* ======

TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60-Minute Volumes: Appr/Exit Totals

Intersection # 1 church/alley ======Begin Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time N E S W N E S W Total ======700 4 0 13 231 8 205 35 0 248 715 5 0 18 263 10 238 38 0 286 730 6 0 21 313 9 287 44 0 340 745 8 0 25 369 15 344 43 0 402 800 13 0 32 398 20 383 40 0 443 815 11 0 24 326 18 312 31 0 361* 830 8 0 18 230 15 222 19 0 256* 845 6 0 9 115 7 113 10 0 130* ------1600 28 0 29 464 30 458 33 0 521 1615 27 0 26 450 25 441 37 0 503 1630 17 0 21 474 26 452 34 0 512 1645 14 0 19 459 24 448 20 0 492 1700 12 0 14 493 26 470 23 0 519 1715 10 0 12 387 22 373 14 0 409* 1730 10 0 11 252 16 246 11 0 273* 1745 3 0 10 120 7 117 9 0 133* ======

Demographic Data

Level of Service Table

LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA Signalized Intersections Average Control Level of Delay Service Interpretation (seconds per vehicle) A Favorable progression. Most vehicles arrive during the ≤10 green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping.

B Good progression, with more vehicles stopping than for >10 - 20 Level of Service A.

C Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued >20 - 35 vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear. Number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping.

D The volume-to-capacity ratio is high and either >35 - 55 progression is ineffective or the cycle length is too long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.

E Progression is unfavorable. The volume-to-capacity ratio >55 - 80 is high and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent.

F The volume-to-capacity ratio is very high, progression is >80.0 very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Total Delay (SEC/VEH) A 0 - 10

B > 10 - 15

C > 15 - 25

D > 25 - 35

E > 35 - 50

F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2010.

Capacity Analyses Reports

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Chicago Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 24 150 24 156 469 0 0 228 96 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 24 150 24 156 469 0 0 228 96 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.99 0.97 Frt 0.982 0.956 Flt Protected 0.994 0.988 Satd. Flow (prot) 00003151 0 0 3211 0 0 3017 0 Flt Permitted 0.994 0.692 Satd. Flow (perm) 00003125 0 0 2222 0 0 3017 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 258 465 245 573 Travel Time (s) 5.9 10.6 5.6 13.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 54 80 80 54 108 75 75 108 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 000021500680003520 Turn Type Perm NA pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 Minimum Split (s) 37.0 37.0 9.0 38.0 38.0 Total Split (s) 37.0 37.0 15.0 53.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 41.1% 41.1% 16.7% 58.9% 42.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 32.0 48.0 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.53 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.53 0.32 Control Delay 20.7 14.3 17.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.7 14.3 17.1 LOS C B B Approach Delay 20.7 14.3 17.1 Approach LOS C B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 43 113 61 Queue Length 95th (ft) 70 153 88 Internal Link Dist (ft) 178 385 165 493 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1111 1294 1106 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Chicago Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.53 0.32 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 85 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 1: Chicago Avenue & Davis Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 00003061061131570000 Future Volume (vph) 00003061061131570000 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 115 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.97 Frt 0.961 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 00003018 0 1711 3250 0000 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 00003018 0 1711 3250 0000 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 52 130 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 55 281 244 601 Travel Time (s) 1.3 6.4 5.5 13.7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 82 75 75 82 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 5 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 5% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 000047401301800000 Turn Type NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 3 4 Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) 29.0 9.0 46.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 15.0 46.0 Total Split (%) 32.2% 16.7% 51.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 24.0 10.0 41.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.11 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.43 0.12 Control Delay 26.0 11.8 14.4 Queue Delay 0.1 0.1 0.0 Total Delay 26.1 11.9 14.4 LOS C BB Approach Delay 26.1 13.4 Approach LOS C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 95 0 30 Queue Length 95th (ft) 151 47 47

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø2 Ø6 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Parking (#/hr) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 1 2 6 Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) 15.0 46.0 29.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 46.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 17% 51% 32% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft)

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft) 1 201 164 521 Turn Bay Length (ft) 85 Base Capacity (vph) 842 305 1480 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 33 11 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.44 0.12 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø2 Ø6 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 40 379 0000014199 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 40 379 0000014199 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.88 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.92 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.995 Satd. Flow (prot) 00003231 000003179 2720 Flt Permitted 0.995 Satd. Flow (perm) 00003215 000003179 2507 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 212 55 254 475 Travel Time (s) 4.8 1.3 5.8 10.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 73 73 99 99 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 3% 2% 0% 2% 2% 2% 0% 6% 1% Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 000048200000162114 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 Permitted Phases 1 6 2 Minimum Split (s) 46.0 46.0 Total Split (s) 46.0 46.0 Total Split (%) 51.1% 51.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 39.0 41.0 41.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.46 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.11 0.10 Control Delay 5.4 14.3 14.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.4 14.3 14.3 LOS A BB Approach Delay 5.4 14.3 Approach LOS A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 26 20

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø3 Ø4 Ø5 Ø6 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Parking (#/hr) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 13456 Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) 15.0 9.0 46.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 46.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 17% 17% 51% 32% 32% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft)

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 43 36 Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 1 174 395 Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 Base Capacity (vph) 1393 1448 1142 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.11 0.10 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Signal Delay: 8.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø3 Ø4 Ø5 Ø6 Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 4: Chicago Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 56 192 130 000040985152010 Future Volume (vph) 56 192 130 000040985152010 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.95 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.949 0.974 Flt Protected 0.993 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2933 000003056 0 0 3103 0 Flt Permitted 0.993 0.913 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2907 000003056 0 0 2837 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 113 43 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 255 469 573 542 Travel Time (s) 5.8 10.7 13.0 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 67 110 110 67 156 92 92 156 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 2% 0% 7% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 411 00000537002340 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Total Split (%) 38.9% 38.9% 61.1% 61.1% 61.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 30.0 50.0 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.56 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.31 0.15 Control Delay 17.6 1.9 10.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.6 1.9 10.0 LOS B A A Approach Delay 17.6 1.9 10.0 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 0 31 Queue Length 95th (ft) 106 1 50 Internal Link Dist (ft) 175 389 493 462 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1044 1716 1576

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 11 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 4: Chicago Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.31 0.15 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.39 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.0 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 4: Chicago Avenue & Church Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Orrington Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 105 344 0000014149000 Future Volume (vph) 105 344 0000014149000 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 40 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 30 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.94 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3250 000003219 1501 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1670 3250 000003219 1414 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 119 56 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 379 283 601 396 Travel Time (s) 8.6 6.4 13.7 9.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 44 92 92 44 11 44 44 11 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 8 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 4% 0% 0% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 119 391 0000016056000 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 Permitted Phases 4 2 Minimum Split (s) 44.0 44.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (s) 44.0 44.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 62.9% 62.9% 37.1% 37.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 39.0 39.0 21.0 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.30 0.30 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.22 0.17 0.12 Control Delay 2.0 8.2 18.6 6.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 2.0 8.2 18.6 6.4 LOS AA BA Approach Delay 6.7 15.5 Approach LOS A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 40 26 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 60 46 22

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 13 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Orrington Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft) 299 203 521 316 Turn Bay Length (ft) 40 70 Base Capacity (vph) 983 1810 965 463 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.22 0.17 0.12 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.22 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 5: Orrington Avenue & Church Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 14 HCM 6th TWSC 6: North-South Alley & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 364 38 1000047 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 364 38 1000047 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 74 0 50 50 0 74 103301 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00040000000 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 0 391 41 1000051

Major/Minor Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - - 0 197 506 - - - 291 Stage 1 - - - 0 0 - - - - Stage 2 - - - 197 506 - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - 7.5 6.5 - - - 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.5 5.5 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 3.5 4 - - - 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 750 472 0 0 0 712 Stage 1 0 ----000- Stage 2 0 - - 792 543 0 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 695 453 - - - 683 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 695 453 - - - - Stage 1 ------Stage 2 - - - 733 521 - - - -

Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 10.2 10.7 HCM LOS B B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 695 - - 683 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.074 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.2 - - 10.7 HCM Lane LOS B - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 7: North-South Alley & Church Street 09/27/2017

Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 336 39 00002301210 Future Vol, veh/h 18 336 39 00002301210 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 43 0 97 97 0 43 704407 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 16979 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 20000000000 Mvmt Flow 20 365 42 00002331310

Major/Minor Major1 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 43 0 0 - 566 305 271 587 - Stage 1 --- - 523 - 43 43 - Stage 2 --- - 43 - 228 544 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.5 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------6.5 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 4 3.3 3.5 4 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1579 - - 0 436 697 665 425 0 Stage 1 --- 0 534 - - - 0 Stage 2 --- 0 - - 760 522 0 Platoon blocked, % -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1541 - - - 396 659 606 386 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 396 - 606 386 - Stage 1 --- - 497 - - - - Stage 2 ------707 485 -

Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 11 11.4 HCM LOS B B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 633 1541 - - 581 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 0.013 - - 0.024 HCM Control Delay (s) 11 7.4 0.1 - 11.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Chicago Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 30 170 31 145 250 0 0 483 184 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 30 170 31 145 250 0 0 483 184 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.97 0.98 0.96 Frt 0.980 0.959 Flt Protected 0.994 0.982 Satd. Flow (prot) 00003119 0 0 3192 0 0 2977 0 Flt Permitted 0.994 0.536 Satd. Flow (perm) 00003084 0 0 1713 0 0 2977 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 258 465 245 573 Travel Time (s) 5.9 10.6 5.6 13.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 119 195 105 119 185 123 123 185 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 000024000411006950 Turn Type Perm NA pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 Minimum Split (s) 37.0 37.0 9.0 38.0 38.0 Total Split (s) 37.0 37.0 15.0 53.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 41.1% 41.1% 16.7% 58.9% 42.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 32.0 48.0 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.53 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.38 0.64 Control Delay 20.9 12.4 20.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.9 12.4 20.6 LOS C B C Approach Delay 20.9 12.4 20.6 Approach LOS C B C Queue Length 50th (ft) 49 62 135 Queue Length 95th (ft) 77 89 173 Internal Link Dist (ft) 178 385 165 493 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1096 1077 1091 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Chicago Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.38 0.64 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 85 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 1: Chicago Avenue & Davis Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0000374134791280000 Future Volume (vph) 0000374134791280000 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 115 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.96 Frt 0.960 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 00003002 0 1711 3250 0000 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 00003002 0 1711 3250 0000 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 55 85 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 55 281 244 601 Travel Time (s) 1.3 6.4 5.5 13.7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 136 102 102 136 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 00005190811310000 Turn Type NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 3 4 Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) 29.0 9.0 46.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 15.0 46.0 Total Split (%) 32.2% 16.7% 51.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 24.0 10.0 41.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.11 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.31 0.09 Control Delay 26.7 11.6 14.1 Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.7 11.6 14.1 LOS C BB Approach Delay 26.7 13.2 Approach LOS C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 109 0 21 Queue Length 95th (ft) 195 39 37

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø2 Ø6 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Parking (#/hr) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 1 2 6 Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) 15.0 46.0 29.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 46.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 17% 51% 32% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft)

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft) 1 201 164 521 Turn Bay Length (ft) 85 Base Capacity (vph) 840 265 1480 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 15 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.31 0.09 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø2 Ø6 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 77 376 00000305217 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 77 376 00000305217 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.88 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.89 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.992 Satd. Flow (prot) 00003208 000003336 2748 Flt Permitted 0.992 Satd. Flow (perm) 00003171 000003336 2455 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 212 55 254 475 Travel Time (s) 4.8 1.3 5.8 10.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 98 98 143 143 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 5% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 000046300000311221 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 Permitted Phases 1 6 2 Minimum Split (s) 46.0 46.0 Total Split (s) 46.0 46.0 Total Split (%) 51.1% 51.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 39.0 41.0 41.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.46 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.34 0.20 0.20 Control Delay 4.1 15.2 15.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 4.1 15.2 15.3 LOS A BB Approach Delay 4.1 15.2 Approach LOS A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 21 54 41 Queue Length 95th (ft) 17 80 66

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø3 Ø4 Ø5 Ø6 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Parking (#/hr) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 13456 Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) 15.0 9.0 46.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 46.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 17% 17% 51% 32% 32% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft)

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 1 174 395 Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 Base Capacity (vph) 1374 1519 1118 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.20 0.20 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø3 Ø4 Ø5 Ø6 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 4: Chicago Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 79 182 271 000024239253840 Future Volume (vph) 79 182 271 000024239253840 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.92 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.924 0.979 Flt Protected 0.993 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2788 000003088 0 0 3244 0 Flt Permitted 0.993 0.924 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2737 000003088 0 0 2999 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 63 33 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 255 469 573 542 Travel Time (s) 5.8 10.7 13.0 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 136 122 122 136 393 120 120 393 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 4% 0% 2% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 554 00000293004260 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Total Split (%) 38.9% 38.9% 61.1% 61.1% 61.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 30.0 50.0 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.56 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.17 0.26 Control Delay 24.7 3.5 10.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.7 3.5 10.9 LOS C A B Approach Delay 24.7 3.5 10.9 Approach LOS C A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 120 6 61 Queue Length 95th (ft) 174 11 88 Internal Link Dist (ft) 175 389 493 462 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 954 1730 1666

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 11 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 4: Chicago Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.17 0.26 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.58 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 4: Chicago Avenue & Church Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Orrington Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 172 404 00000198151000 Future Volume (vph) 172 404 00000198151000 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 40 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 30 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.90 0.85 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3250 000003219 1501 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1532 3250 000003219 1271 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 163 123 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 379 283 601 396 Travel Time (s) 8.6 6.4 13.7 9.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 194 230 230 194 104 141 141 104 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 4% 0% 0% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 195 459 00000225172000 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 Permitted Phases 4 2 Minimum Split (s) 44.0 44.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (s) 44.0 44.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 62.9% 62.9% 37.1% 37.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 39.0 39.0 21.0 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.30 0.30 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.25 0.23 0.37 Control Delay 2.7 8.4 19.2 9.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 2.7 8.4 19.2 9.4 LOS AA BA Approach Delay 6.7 15.0 Approach LOS A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 48 37 15 Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 71 62 57

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 13 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Orrington Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft) 299 203 521 316 Turn Bay Length (ft) 40 70 Base Capacity (vph) 925 1810 965 467 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.25 0.23 0.37 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.37 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 5: Orrington Avenue & Church Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 14 HCM 6th TWSC 6: North-South Alley & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 441 58 0000067 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 441 58 0000067 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 121 0 106 106 0 121 305503 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00040000000 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 0 474 62 0000072

Major/Minor Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - - 0 240 657 - - - 392 Stage 1 - - - 0 0 - - - - Stage 2 - - - 240 657 - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - 7.5 6.5 - - - 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.5 5.5 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 3.5 4 - - - 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 699 387 0 0 0 613 Stage 1 0 ----000- Stage 2 0 - - 748 465 0 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 611 361 - - - 572 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 611 361 - - - - Stage 1 ------Stage 2 - - - 654 434 - - - -

Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 12.2 HCM LOS A B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - - - 572 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.126 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 12.2 HCM Lane LOS A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0.4

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 7: North-South Alley & Church Street 09/27/2017

Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 509 23 00003111200 Future Vol, veh/h 23 509 23 00003111200 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 52 0 214 214 0 52 13 088013 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 16979 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 20000000000 Mvmt Flow 24 530 24 00003111300

Major/Minor Major1 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 52 0 0 - 856 499 375 868 - Stage 1 --- - 804 - 52 52 - Stage 2 --- - 52 - 323 816 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.5 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------6.5 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 4 3.3 3.5 4 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1567 - - 0 297 522 562 293 0 Stage 1 --- 0 398 - - - 0 Stage 2 --- 0 - - 669 393 0 Platoon blocked, % -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1522 - - - 248 460 518 245 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 248 - 518 245 - Stage 1 --- - 343 - - - - Stage 2 ------632 338 -

Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 14.6 12.1 HCM LOS B B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 389 1522 - - 518 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 0.016 - - 0.024 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.6 7.4 0.1 - 12.1 HCM Lane LOS B A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0.1

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Existing Synchro 9 Report RAC Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Chicago Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 25 156 27 168 485 0 0 261 110 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 25 156 27 168 485 0 0 261 110 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.99 0.97 Frt 0.981 0.955 Flt Protected 0.994 0.987 Satd. Flow (prot) 00003142 0 0 3208 0 0 2997 0 Flt Permitted 0.994 0.666 Satd. Flow (perm) 00003111 0 0 2135 0 0 2997 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 258 465 245 573 Travel Time (s) 5.9 10.6 5.6 13.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 64 96 96 64 128 90 90 128 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6 6 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 000022600710004040 Turn Type Perm NA pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 Minimum Split (s) 37.0 37.0 9.0 38.0 38.0 Total Split (s) 37.0 37.0 15.0 53.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 41.1% 41.1% 16.7% 58.9% 42.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 32.0 48.0 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.53 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.56 0.37 Control Delay 20.8 14.8 17.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.8 14.8 17.5 LOS C B B Approach Delay 20.8 14.8 17.5 Approach LOS C B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 46 120 72 Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 161 102 Internal Link Dist (ft) 178 385 165 493 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1106 1257 1098 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Chicago Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.56 0.37 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 85 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 1: Chicago Avenue & Davis Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 00003351201161620000 Future Volume (vph) 00003351201161620000 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 115 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.97 Frt 0.960 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 00003005 0 1711 3250 0000 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 00003005 0 1711 3250 0000 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 55 133 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 55 281 244 601 Travel Time (s) 1.3 6.4 5.5 13.7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 90 82 82 90 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 5 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 5% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 000052301331860000 Turn Type NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 3 4 Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) 29.0 9.0 46.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 15.0 46.0 Total Split (%) 32.2% 16.7% 51.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 24.0 10.0 41.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.11 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.43 0.13 Control Delay 27.9 11.8 14.5 Queue Delay 0.2 0.2 0.0 Total Delay 28.1 12.0 14.5 LOS C BB Approach Delay 28.1 13.4 Approach LOS C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 110 0 31 Queue Length 95th (ft) 180 47 48

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø2 Ø6 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Parking (#/hr) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 1 2 6 Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) 15.0 46.0 29.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 46.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 17% 51% 32% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft)

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft) 1 201 164 521 Turn Bay Length (ft) 85 Base Capacity (vph) 841 308 1480 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 34 14 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.45 0.13 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø2 Ø6 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 52 399 00000148101 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 52 399 00000148101 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.88 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.92 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.994 Satd. Flow (prot) 00003227 000003179 2720 Flt Permitted 0.994 Satd. Flow (perm) 00003206 000003179 2489 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 212 55 254 475 Travel Time (s) 4.8 1.3 5.8 10.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 80 80 109 109 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 3% 2% 0% 2% 2% 2% 0% 6% 1% Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 000051900000170116 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 Permitted Phases 1 6 2 Minimum Split (s) 46.0 46.0 Total Split (s) 46.0 46.0 Total Split (%) 51.1% 51.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 39.0 41.0 41.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.46 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.12 0.10 Control Delay 5.3 14.4 14.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.3 14.4 14.3 LOS A BB Approach Delay 5.3 14.4 Approach LOS A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 28 20

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø3 Ø4 Ø5 Ø6 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Parking (#/hr) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 13456 Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) 15.0 9.0 46.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 46.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 17% 17% 51% 32% 32% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft)

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 95th (ft) 24 45 36 Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 1 174 395 Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 Base Capacity (vph) 1389 1448 1133 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.12 0.10 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Signal Delay: 8.5 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø3 Ø4 Ø5 Ø6 Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 4: Chicago Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 74 203 148 000044892152170 Future Volume (vph) 74 203 148 000044892152170 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.94 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.948 0.974 Flt Protected 0.991 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2897 000003052 0 0 3102 0 Flt Permitted 0.991 0.912 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2861 000003052 0 0 2833 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 118 43 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 255 469 573 542 Travel Time (s) 5.8 10.7 13.0 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 80 132 132 80 187 110 110 187 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 2% 0% 7% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 462 00000587002520 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Total Split (%) 38.9% 38.9% 61.1% 61.1% 61.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 30.0 50.0 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.56 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.34 0.16 Control Delay 18.8 2.6 10.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 18.8 2.6 10.1 LOS B A B Approach Delay 18.8 2.6 10.1 Approach LOS B A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 77 7 34 Queue Length 95th (ft) 122 11 53 Internal Link Dist (ft) 175 389 493 462 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1032 1714 1573

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 11 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 4: Chicago Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.34 0.16 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.45 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 4: Chicago Avenue & Church Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Orrington Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 108 364 0000015650000 Future Volume (vph) 108 364 0000015650000 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 40 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 30 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.97 0.94 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3250 000003219 1501 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1666 3250 000003219 1408 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 123 57 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 379 283 601 396 Travel Time (s) 8.6 6.4 13.7 9.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 48 101 101 48 12 48 48 12 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 8 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 4% 0% 0% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 123 414 0000017757000 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 Permitted Phases 4 2 Minimum Split (s) 44.0 44.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (s) 44.0 44.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 62.9% 62.9% 37.1% 37.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 39.0 39.0 21.0 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.30 0.30 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.23 0.18 0.12 Control Delay 2.0 8.3 18.8 6.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 2.0 8.3 18.8 6.4 LOS AA BA Approach Delay 6.8 15.8 Approach LOS A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 43 29 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 63 51 22

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 13 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Orrington Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft) 299 203 521 316 Turn Bay Length (ft) 40 70 Base Capacity (vph) 982 1810 965 462 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.23 0.18 0.12 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.23 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.5 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 5: Orrington Avenue & Church Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 14 HCM 6th TWSC 6: North-South Alley & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 458 108 1000073 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 458 108 1000073 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 83 0 55 55 0 83 103301 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00040000000 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 0 492 116 1000078

Major/Minor Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - - 0 247 691 - - - 388 Stage 1 - - - 0 0 - - - - Stage 2 - - - 247 691 - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - 7.5 6.5 - - - 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.5 5.5 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 3.5 4 - - - 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 692 370 0 0 0 616 Stage 1 0 ----000- Stage 2 0 - - 741 449 0 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 600 353 - - - 588 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 600 353 - - - - Stage 1 ------Stage 2 - - - 642 428 - - - -

Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 11 12.1 HCM LOS B B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 600 - - 588 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.133 HCM Control Delay (s) 11 - - 12.1 HCM Lane LOS B - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.5

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 7: North-South Alley & Church Street 09/27/2017

Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 350 45 00002631210 Future Vol, veh/h 19 350 45 00002631210 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 47 0 107 107 0 47 704407 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 16979 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 20000000000 Mvmt Flow 21 380 49 00002681310

Major/Minor Major1 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 47 0 0 - 601 326 284 625 - Stage 1 --- - 554 - 47 47 - Stage 2 --- - 47 - 237 578 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.5 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------6.5 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 4 3.3 3.5 4 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1573 - - 0 417 676 651 404 0 Stage 1 --- 0 517 - - - 0 Stage 2 --- 0 - - 751 504 0 Platoon blocked, % -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1532 - - - 375 636 555 364 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 375 - 555 364 - Stage 1 --- - 478 - - - - Stage 2 ------655 466 -

Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 11.5 11.9 HCM LOS B B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 623 1532 - - 533 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.113 0.013 - - 0.027 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.5 7.4 0.1 - 11.9 HCM Lane LOS B A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0.1

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 8:00 am 12/10/2015 AM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Chicago Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 31 182 41 177 271 0 0 513 217 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 31 182 41 177 271 0 0 513 217 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.97 0.98 0.94 Frt 0.976 0.955 Flt Protected 0.994 0.981 Satd. Flow (prot) 00003087 0 0 3188 0 0 2927 0 Flt Permitted 0.994 0.527 Satd. Flow (perm) 00003047 0 0 1681 0 0 2927 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 258 465 245 573 Travel Time (s) 5.9 10.6 5.6 13.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 143 126 126 143 222 148 148 222 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 000026500466007600 Turn Type Perm NA pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 Minimum Split (s) 37.0 37.0 9.0 38.0 38.0 Total Split (s) 37.0 37.0 15.0 53.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 41.1% 41.1% 16.7% 58.9% 42.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 32.0 48.0 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.53 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.44 0.71 Control Delay 21.2 12.9 21.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.2 12.9 21.7 LOS C B C Approach Delay 21.2 12.9 21.7 Approach LOS C B C Queue Length 50th (ft) 55 71 151 Queue Length 95th (ft) 85 101 187 Internal Link Dist (ft) 178 385 165 493 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1083 1063 1073 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Chicago Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.24 0.44 0.71 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 85 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 1: Chicago Avenue & Davis Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0000405142811360000 Future Volume (vph) 0000405142811360000 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 115 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.95 Frt 0.961 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 00002996 0 1711 3250 0000 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 00002996 0 1711 3250 0000 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 53 85 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 55 281 244 601 Travel Time (s) 1.3 6.4 5.5 13.7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 149 112 112 149 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 00005580831390000 Turn Type NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 3 4 Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) 29.0 9.0 46.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 15.0 46.0 Total Split (%) 32.2% 16.7% 51.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 24.0 10.0 41.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.11 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.31 0.09 Control Delay 28.5 12.0 14.2 Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.6 12.0 14.2 LOS C BB Approach Delay 28.6 13.4 Approach LOS C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 136 0 22 Queue Length 95th (ft) 213 40 40

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø2 Ø6 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Parking (#/hr) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 1 2 6 Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) 15.0 46.0 29.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 46.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 17% 51% 32% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft)

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft) 1 201 164 521 Turn Bay Length (ft) 85 Base Capacity (vph) 837 265 1480 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 14 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.68 0.31 0.09 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.67 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Orrington Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø2 Ø6 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 89 397 00000327222 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 89 397 00000327222 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.88 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.88 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.991 Satd. Flow (prot) 00003204 000003336 2748 Flt Permitted 0.991 Satd. Flow (perm) 00003160 000003336 2429 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 212 55 254 475 Travel Time (s) 4.8 1.3 5.8 10.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 108 108 157 157 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 5% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 000049600000334227 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 Permitted Phases 1 6 2 Minimum Split (s) 46.0 46.0 Total Split (s) 46.0 46.0 Total Split (%) 51.1% 51.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 39.0 41.0 41.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.46 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.22 0.21 Control Delay 3.9 15.3 15.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 3.9 15.3 15.4 LOS A BB Approach Delay 3.9 15.3 Approach LOS A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 21 58 42 Queue Length 95th (ft) 17 86 68

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø3 Ø4 Ø5 Ø6 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Parking (#/hr) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 13456 Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) 15.0 9.0 46.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 46.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 17% 17% 51% 32% 32% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft)

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 1 174 395 Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 Base Capacity (vph) 1369 1519 1106 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.22 0.21 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.67 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.0 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sherman Avenue & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group Ø1 Ø3 Ø4 Ø5 Ø6 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 4: Chicago Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 95 192 307 000026744264330 Future Volume (vph) 95 192 307 000026744264330 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.90 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.922 0.979 Flt Protected 0.992 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2743 000003082 0 0 3244 0 Flt Permitted 0.992 0.923 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2678 000003082 0 0 2995 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 37 33 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 255 469 573 542 Travel Time (s) 5.8 10.7 13.0 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 164 146 146 164 472 144 144 472 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 4% 0% 2% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 619 00000324004780 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Total Split (%) 38.9% 38.9% 61.1% 61.1% 61.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 30.0 50.0 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.56 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.19 0.29 Control Delay 28.6 4.3 11.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.6 4.3 11.2 LOS C A B Approach Delay 28.6 4.3 11.2 Approach LOS C A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 148 10 70 Queue Length 95th (ft) 210 15 100 Internal Link Dist (ft) 175 389 493 462 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 917 1726 1663

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 11 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 4: Chicago Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.68 0.19 0.29 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 4: Chicago Avenue & Church Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Orrington Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 176 455 00000214155000 Future Volume (vph) 176 455 00000214155000 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 40 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 30 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.89 0.83 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3250 000003219 1501 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1514 3250 000003219 1251 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 138 95 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 379 283 601 396 Travel Time (s) 8.6 6.4 13.7 9.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 213 253 253 213 114 155 155 114 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 4% 0% 0% 0% Parking (#/hr) 0000 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 517 00000243176000 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 Permitted Phases 4 2 Minimum Split (s) 44.0 44.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (s) 44.0 44.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 62.9% 62.9% 37.1% 37.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Act Effct Green (s) 39.0 39.0 21.0 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.30 0.30 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.29 0.25 0.40 Control Delay 3.5 8.7 19.4 12.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 3.5 8.7 19.4 12.7 LOS AA BB Approach Delay 7.2 16.6 Approach LOS A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 56 41 26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 37 80 66 72

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 13 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Orrington Avenue & Church Street 09/27/2017

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft) 299 203 521 316 Turn Bay Length (ft) 40 70 Base Capacity (vph) 904 1810 965 441 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.29 0.25 0.40 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.40 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 5: Orrington Avenue & Church Street

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 14 HCM 6th TWSC 6: North-South Alley & Davis Street 09/27/2017

Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 458 108 0000094 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 458 108 0000094 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 133 0 116 116 0 133 305503 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00040000000 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 0 492 116 00000101

Major/Minor Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - - 0 249 741 - - - 440 Stage 1 - - - 0 0 - - - - Stage 2 - - - 249 741 - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - 7.5 6.5 - - - 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.5 5.5 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 3.5 4 - - - 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 689 347 0 0 0 570 Stage 1 0 ----000- Stage 2 0 - - 739 426 0 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 557 321 - - - 528 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 557 321 - - - - Stage 1 ------Stage 2 - - - 598 394 - - - -

Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 13.4 HCM LOS A B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - - - 528 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.191 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 13.4 HCM Lane LOS A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0.7

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 7: North-South Alley & Church Street 09/27/2017

Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 544 42 00003381200 Future Vol, veh/h 24 544 42 00003381200 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 57 0 235 235 0 57 14 088014 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 16979 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 20000000000 Mvmt Flow 25 567 44 00003401300

Major/Minor Major1 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 57 0 0 - 931 549 400 953 - Stage 1 --- - 874 - 57 57 - Stage 2 --- - 57 - 343 896 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.5 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------6.5 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 4 3.3 3.5 4 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1560 - - 0 269 485 540 261 0 Stage 1 --- 0 370 - - - 0 Stage 2 --- 0 - - 651 362 0 Platoon blocked, % -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1511 - - - 221 422 460 214 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 221 - 460 214 - Stage 1 --- - 313 - - - - Stage 2 ------569 307 -

Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 15.2 13 HCM LOS C B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 396 1511 - - 460 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.108 0.017 - - 0.027 HCM Control Delay (s) 15.2 7.4 0.1 - 13 HCM Lane LOS C A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 - - 0.1

14-256 - Chicago/Davis Apartments - Evanston 5:00 pm 12/10/2015 PM Projected Synchro 8 Report RAC Page 2