Satellite Image Atlas of Glaciers of the World--State of the Earth's

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Satellite Image Atlas of Glaciers of the World--State of the Earth's Ice Cores, High-Mountain Glaciers, and Climate By LONNIE G. THOMPSON5 Introduction The near-global retreat of high-mountain glaciers and the shrinkage of ice fields and ice caps and retreat of their associated outlet glaciers are perhaps the most visible evidence for 20th-century climate change and the recent increase in the globally averaged near-surface temperatures of the Earth’s surface. The loss of high-mountain glaciers—including ice fields, ice caps, and other glaciers—not only diminishes regional water supplies but also destroys the long, scientifically valuable, and often detailed climatic histories that are unavailable from any other terrestrial or marine record. The question arises as to the significance of 20th-century retreat of glaciers within a much longer perspective. In a few cases, the paleoclimate histories contained within ice cores from these shrinking ice fields and ice caps can provide this critical temporal context. The ongoing global-scale rapid retreat of mountain glaciers threatens freshwater supplies in many of the world’s most populous regions while at the same time contributing to the rise in global sea level. Innovations in lightweight drilling technology have enabled paleoclimatic research on ice cores to expand from the polar regions (for example, ice cores from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets) to ice fields and ice caps in many of the highest mountains on Earth. During the last few decades, much effort has been focused on retrieving ice cores from glaciers in subpolar regions, such as western Canada and eastern Alaska; from the mid-latitudes, such as the Rocky Mountains and the Alps; and from tropical mountains in Africa, South America, and China. Unlike climate records from polar ice cores, those from lower latitude high-mountain glaciers—including ice caps, ice fields, and other types of glaciers—present information necessary for studying climatic processes in areas where human activities are concentrated, especially in the tropics and subtropics, where 70 percent of the world’s population lives. During the past 100 years, changes in global and regional-scale climates and environmental changes to which human beings are vulnerable have accelerated. These changes will increasingly affect us in the current century and in future centuries. The following overview of the archives of these past changes as held in high-mountain glaciers on millennial to decadal time scales includes a review of the recent, global-scale retreat of these high-mountain glaciers under present climate conditions. The significance of this retreat for the longer term perspec- tive, which can be inferred only from paleoclimate records contained in ice cores, is also discussed. Geographic Locations of Mountains Where Glacier Ice Cores Have Been Obtained The sites where many of the high-altitude glacier ice cores have been retrieved are shown in figure 37 and listed in table 10. Among the earliest efforts to retrieve climate records from high-mountain glaciers were research 5 Byrd Polar Research Center, and Department of Geological Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210. STATE OF THE EARTH’S CRYOSPHERE—GLACIERS A157 Figure 37.—Geographic locations of sites where ice cores have been obtained by the ice-core paleoclimate re- search group at the Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University. PARCA, Program for Arctic Regional Climate Assessment. programs from 1974 to 1979, which involved surface sampling on the Quelccaya Ice Cap (5,670 m above sea level [asl]; lat 13°56' S., long 70°50' W.) in southern Perú. (See section on Quelccaya Ice Cap by Stefan Hastenrath in Chapter 1386–I, “Glaciers of South America,” p. I64–I65, of this series (Morales-Arnao, 1998)). The results from this preliminary research by the Institute of Polar Studies (now the Byrd Polar Research Center, or BPRC) at The Ohio State University paved the way for the first tropical high-altitude, deep-drilling program on the Quelccaya Ice Cap in 1983, which yielded a 1,500- year climate record. Meanwhile, in western Canada in 1980, a 103-m ice core was drilled on Mount Logan (5,340 m asl; lat 60°35' N., long 140°35' W.) by Canada’s National Hydrology Research Laboratory. The record from this core extends back to A.D. 1736. The ice caps on both mountains have been redrilled recently, Mount Logan in 2002 and Quelccaya Ice Cap in 2003. During the intervening decades high-mountain ice-core research has expanded signifi- cantly throughout the world, with programs successfully completed on the Tibetan Plateau, the Himalaya, the Cordillera Blanca of northern Perú, Bolivia, East Africa, the Swiss and Italian Alps, Alaska, and the Pacific Northwest of the United States. In 2002, the BPRC paleoclimate ice-core group succeeded in retrieving the deepest ice cores ever recorded (460 m) from the col between Mount Bona (5,008 m asl) and Mount Churchill (4,770 m asl) in the St. Elias Mountains of southeastern Alaska. (See descriptions of glaciers in this mountain range in Chapter 1386–K, “Glaciers of Alaska,” of this series (Molnia, 2008). A158 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD TTableable 110.0.—A selection of sites of high-mountainhigh-mountain glaciersglaciers from whichwhich research organizationsorganizations have obtaineobtainedd ice cores since 198since 19800 [NA, time series for this ice core is not yet available; place-name in italics indicates that it is informal usausagege ((unapproved)unapproved)]] AbbreviationsAbbreviations forfor thethe organizations: PPSI,SI, Paul Scherrer Institut (Switzerland)(Switzerland) IRD, Institut de Recherche pourpour le DéveloppementDéveloppement (France(France)) BPRC, Byrd Polar Research Center ((previouslypreviously called the Institute ooff LGGE, LaboratoireLaboratoire dede GlaciologieGlaciologie et GéophysiqueGéophysique dede l’Environnementl’Environnement PPolarolar Studies), The Ohio State University (USA(USA)) ((France)France) NHRC, National HydrologyHydrology Research Centre (Canada)(Canada) IGRAS, Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Science (Russia(Russia)) NGP, National Glaciology Programme (Canada)(Canada) IFU, Institut für UmweltphysikUmweltphysik (Germany)(Germany) AAINA,INA, Arctic Institute of North America, University of Calgary (Canada) UNIBE, Universität Bern (Switzerland)(Switzerland) NIPR, National Institute of Polar Research (Japan)(Japan) LIICRE, Key LaboratoryLaboratory ofof Ice Core andand ColdCold Regions Environment IQCS, Institute for Quaternary and Climate Studies ((nownow called the CCI, ((China)China) Climate Change InstituteInstitute),), University of Maine (USA)(USA) UNH, Institute forfor thethe StudyStudy ofof Earth,Earth, Oceans, anandd Space, University ooff USGS, U. S. Geological Survey (USA(USA)) New HampshireHampshire (USA(USA)) EElevationlevation LLengthength ooff Name ofof glacierizedglacierized mountain or glacier,glacier, LocationLocation LeaLeadingding LLengthength ooff core ((metersmeters above YYearear ddrilledrilled rrecordecord aandnd state or countrcountryy ((latitudelatitude and lonlongitude)gitude) ororganizationganization ((meters)meters) sea levellevel)) ((years)years) Mount Bona/Mount ChurchillChurchill,, Alaska 61°2424´N.´N. 114141°4242´W.´W. 4,4,420420 2002 BPR BPRCC 460 NA Mount LoLogan,gan, CanadaCanada 60°3535´N.´N. 141400°3535´W.´W. 55,340,340 19 198080 NHRCNHRC,, 110303 225225 2002 NNGP,GP, AINAAINA,, 190 NA NIPR, 222020 NA IIQCS,QCS, UNH 334545 NA EEclipseclipse Dome, CanadaCanada 60°51´N.51´N. 131399°4747´W.´W. 3,3,017017 199 19966 UN UNHH 1 16060 NA Fremont GGlaciers,laciers, WyominWyomingg 4433°0909N.N. 101099°3737´W.´W. 4,4,100100 1 1991991 USGS 16 1600 227575 11998998 550,0, 116060 NA Gora Belukha, Kazakhstan/RussiaKazakhstan/Russia 49°448´N.8´N. 8866°3434´E.´E. 4,04,06262 2 2001001 PS PSI,I, UNIBE 140140 200+ FiescFiescherhorner,herhorner, SwitzerSwitzerlandland 46°3232´N.´N. 8°0202´E.´E. 33,880,880 1 1988988 PSPSI,I, UNIBE 30 30 42 2002 150 CoColl dduu Dôme,Dôme, FranceFrance 45°550´N.0´N. 6°550´0´E. 4,4,250250 1 1994994 LGGE LGGE,, IFIFUU 139139 7 755 Mont BBlanc,lanc, France 45°445´N.5´N. 6°5050´E.´E. 4,804,8077 1 1994994 LGG LGGEE 1 14040 200 200++ Djantugan, RussiRussiaa 43°112´N.2´N. 42°446´E.6´E. 3,3,600600 1 1983983 I IGRASGRAS 93 9357 57 GreGregoriev,goriev, KyrgyzstanKyrgyzstan 41°58´N.58´N. 7777°5555´E.´E. 4,4,660660 19911991 IGIGRAS,RAS, BPR BPRCC 20, 1166 53 20012001 IIGRASGRAS 21.21.55 NA 2003 IIGRASGRAS 2222 NA DunDundede ice cap,cap, CChinahina 38°006´N.6´N. 96°2424´E.´E. 5,5,325325 19 198787 BPRC BPRC,, LIICRE 183183 10,000+10,000+ Malan ice cap,cap, ChinChinaa 35°5050´N.´N. 9900°4040´E.´E. 66,056,056 1999 L LIICREIICRE 102 112+112+ GuGuliyaliya ice cap, CChinahina 35°1717´N.´N. 8811°2929´E.´E. 66,200,200 1 1992992 BPR BPRC,C, LIILIICRECRE 302 110,000+110,000+ Purugangri ice cap, CChinahina 33°5555´N.´N. 8899°005´W.5´W. 6,6,000000 2000 BPRC BPRC,, LIICRE 208 NA Dasuopu glacier,glacier, CChinahina 28°2323´N.´N. 8855°4343´E.´E. 77,200,200 1 1996996 BPRC BPRC,, LIICRE 162 1,000+1,000+ Qomolangma, NepalNepal/China/China 27°5959´N.´N. 8866°5555´E.´E. 6,6,500500 1 1998998 UNH UNH,, LIICRLIICREE 80 80 15 1544 KiKilimanjarolimanjaro ice fifields,elds, Tanzani Tanzaniaa 3°0404´S.´S. 3377°2121´E.´E. 5,5,895895 2000 BPR BPRCC 5252 11, 11,700700 NevaNevadodo HuascaránHuascarán,, Perú 9°0606´S.´S. 77°336´W.6´W. 6,6,050050 1 1993993 BPR BPRCC 166 19 19,000,000 Quelccaya ice cacapp, PPerúerú 1133°556´S.6´S. 70°550´W.0´W. 5,5,670670 1 1983983 BPRBPRCC 1 155,55, 161644 1,1,500500 2003 16168,8, 129 11,800,800 NNevadoevado Illimani, BoliviBoliviaa 16°3737´S.´S. 6677°4747´W.´W. 66,350,350 1 1999999 I IRD,RD, PSIPSI 1 137,37, 113939 1 18,0008,000 NevaNevadodo Sajama, BoBolivialivia 18°006´S.6´S. 6688°5353´W.´W.
Recommended publications
  • 1922 Elizabeth T
    co.rYRIG HT, 192' The Moootainetro !scot1oror,d The MOUNTAINEER VOLUME FIFTEEN Number One D EC E M BER 15, 1 9 2 2 ffiount Adams, ffiount St. Helens and the (!oat Rocks I ncoq)Ora,tecl 1913 Organized 190!i EDITORlAL ST AitF 1922 Elizabeth T. Kirk,vood, Eclttor Margaret W. Hazard, Associate Editor· Fairman B. L�e, Publication Manager Arthur L. Loveless Effie L. Chapman Subsc1·iption Price. $2.00 per year. Annual ·(onl�') Se,·ent�·-Five Cents. Published by The Mountaineers lncorJ,orated Seattle, Washington Enlerecl as second-class matter December 15, 19t0. at the Post Office . at . eattle, "\Yash., under the .-\0t of March 3. 1879. .... I MOUNT ADAMS lllobcl Furrs AND REFLEC'rION POOL .. <§rtttings from Aristibes (. Jhoutribes Author of "ll3ith the <6obs on lltount ®l!!mµus" �. • � J� �·,,. ., .. e,..:,L....._d.L.. F_,,,.... cL.. ��-_, _..__ f.. pt",- 1-� r�._ '-';a_ ..ll.-�· t'� 1- tt.. �ti.. ..._.._....L- -.L.--e-- a';. ��c..L. 41- �. C4v(, � � �·,,-- �JL.,�f w/U. J/,--«---fi:( -A- -tr·�� �, : 'JJ! -, Y .,..._, e� .,...,____,� � � t-..__., ,..._ -u..,·,- .,..,_, ;-:.. � --r J /-e,-i L,J i-.,( '"'; 1..........,.- e..r- ,';z__ /-t.-.--,r� ;.,-.,.....__ � � ..-...,.,-<. ,.,.f--· :tL. ��- ''F.....- ,',L � .,.__ � 'f- f-� --"- ��7 � �. � �;')'... f ><- -a.c__ c/ � r v-f'.fl,'7'71.. I /!,,-e..-,K-// ,l...,"4/YL... t:l,._ c.J.� J..,_-...A 'f ',y-r/� �- lL.. ��•-/IC,/ ,V l j I '/ ;· , CONTENTS i Page Greetings .......................................................................tlristicles }!}, Phoiitricles ........ r The Mount Adams, Mount St. Helens, and the Goat Rocks Outing .......................................... B1/.ith Page Bennett 9 1 Selected References from Preceding Mount Adams and Mount St.
    [Show full text]
  • 1961 Climbers Outing in the Icefield Range of the St
    the Mountaineer 1962 Entered as second-class matter, April 8, 1922, at Post Office in Seattle, Wash., under the Act of March 3, 1879. Published monthly and semi-monthly during March and December by THE MOUNTAINEERS, P. 0. Box 122, Seattle 11, Wash. Clubroom is at 523 Pike Street in Seattle. Subscription price is $3.00 per year. The Mountaineers To explore and study the mountains, forests, and watercourses of the Northwest; To gather into permanent form the history and traditions of this region; To preserve by the encouragement of protective legislation or otherwise the natural beauty of Northwest America; To make expeditions into these regions in fulfillment of the above purposes; To encourage a spirit of good fellowship among all lovers of outdoor Zif e. EDITORIAL STAFF Nancy Miller, Editor, Marjorie Wilson, Betty Manning, Winifred Coleman The Mountaineers OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES Robert N. Latz, President Peggy Lawton, Secretary Arthur Bratsberg, Vice-President Edward H. Murray, Treasurer A. L. Crittenden Frank Fickeisen Peggy Lawton John Klos William Marzolf Nancy Miller Morris Moen Roy A. Snider Ira Spring Leon Uziel E. A. Robinson (Ex-Officio) James Geniesse (Everett) J. D. Cockrell (Tacoma) James Pennington (Jr. Representative) OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES : TACOMA BRANCH Nels Bjarke, Chairman Wilma Shannon, Treasurer Harry Connor, Vice Chairman Miles Johnson John Freeman (Ex-Officio) (Jr. Representative) Jack Gallagher James Henriot Edith Goodman George Munday Helen Sohlberg, Secretary OFFICERS: EVERETT BRANCH Jim Geniesse, Chairman Dorothy Philipp, Secretary Ralph Mackey, Treasurer COPYRIGHT 1962 BY THE MOUNTAINEERS The Mountaineer Climbing Code· A climbing party of three is the minimum, unless adequate support is available who have knowledge that the climb is in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Range
    Alaska Range Introduction The heavily glacierized Alaska Range consists of a number of adjacent and discrete mountain ranges that extend in an arc more than 750 km long (figs. 1, 381). From east to west, named ranges include the Nutzotin, Mentas- ta, Amphitheater, Clearwater, Tokosha, Kichatna, Teocalli, Tordrillo, Terra Cotta, and Revelation Mountains. This arcuate mountain massif spans the area from the White River, just east of the Canadian Border, to Merrill Pass on the western side of Cook Inlet southwest of Anchorage. Many of the indi- Figure 381.—Index map of vidual ranges support glaciers. The total glacier area of the Alaska Range is the Alaska Range showing 2 approximately 13,900 km (Post and Meier, 1980, p. 45). Its several thousand the glacierized areas. Index glaciers range in size from tiny unnamed cirque glaciers with areas of less map modified from Field than 1 km2 to very large valley glaciers with lengths up to 76 km (Denton (1975a). Figure 382.—Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the Alaska Range in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image mosaic from Mike Fleming, Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska. The numbers 1–5 indicate the seg- ments of the Alaska Range discussed in the text. K406 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD and Field, 1975a, p. 575) and areas of greater than 500 km2. Alaska Range glaciers extend in elevation from above 6,000 m, near the summit of Mount McKinley, to slightly more than 100 m above sea level at Capps and Triumvi- rate Glaciers in the southwestern part of the range.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Notes
    268 NORTH AMERICAN NOTES NORTH AMERICAN NOTES BY KENNETH A. HENDERSON HE year I 967 marked the Centennial celebration of the purchase of Alaska from Russia by the United States and the Centenary of the Articles of Confederation which formed the Canadian provinces into the Dominion of Canada. Thus both Alaska and Canada were in a mood to celebrate, and a part of this celebration was expressed · in an extremely active climbing season both in Alaska and the Yukon, where some of the highest mountains on the continent are located. While much of the officially sponsored mountaineering activity was concentrated in the border mountains between Alaska and the Yukon, there was intense activity all over Alaska as well. More information is now available on the first winter ascent of Mount McKinley mentioned in A.J. 72. 329. The team of eight was inter­ national in scope, a Frenchman, Swiss, German, Japanese, and New Zealander, the rest Americans. The successful group of three reached the summit on February 28 in typical Alaskan weather, -62° F. and winds of 35-40 knots. On their return they were stormbound at Denali Pass camp, I7,3oo ft. for seven days. For the forty days they were on the mountain temperatures averaged -35° to -40° F. (A.A.J. I6. 2I.) One of the most important attacks on McKinley in the summer of I967 was probably the three-pronged assault on the South face by the three parties under the general direction of Boyd Everett (A.A.J. I6. IO). The fourteen men flew in to the South east fork of the Kahiltna glacier on June 22 and split into three groups for the climbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Resedimentation of the Late Holocene White River Tephra, Yukon Territory and Alaska
    Resedimentation of the late Holocene White River tephra, Yukon Territory and Alaska K.D. West1 and J.A. Donaldson2 Carleton University3 West, K.D. and Donaldson, J.A. 2002. Resedimentation of the late Holocene White River tephra, Yukon Territory and Alaska. In: Yukon Exploration and Geology 2002, D.S. Emond, L.H. Weston and L.L. Lewis (eds.), Exploration and Geological Services Division, Yukon Region, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, p. 239-247. ABSTRACT The Wrangell region of eastern Alaska represents a zone of extensive volcanism marked by intermittent pyroclastic activity during the late Holocene. The most recent and widely dispersed pyroclastic deposit in this area is the White River tephra, a distinct tephra-fall deposit covering 540 000 km2 in Alaska, Yukon, and the Northwest Territories. This deposit is the product of two Plinian eruptions from Mount Churchill, preserved in two distinct lobes, created ca. 1887 years B.P. (northern lobe) and 1147 years B.P. (eastern lobe). The tephra consists of distal primary air-fall deposits and proximal, locally resedimented volcaniclastic deposits. Distinctive layers such as the White River tephra provide important chronostratigraphic control and can be used to interpret the cultural and environmental impact of ancient large magnitude eruptions. The resedimentation of White River tephra has resulted in large-scale terraces, which fl ank the margins of Klutlan Glacier. Preliminary analysis of resedimented deposits demonstrates that the volcanic stratigraphy within individual terraces is complex and unique. RÉSUMÉ Au cours de l’Holocène tardif, des matériaux pyroclastiques ont été projetés lors d’importantes et nombreuses éruptions volcaniques, dans la région de Wrangell de l’est de l’Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining and Sizing-Up Mountains
    Defining and Sizing-up Mountains By Steven Fry What are the ten highest mountains in the world? ridge-level, before it is considered an individual Is Mount Everest larger than Mount McKinley? Does mountain. Mount Rainier rise higher above its base than In 1981, following 12 years of academic, profes- Everest? Unbelievably, these questions have never sional and recreational mountain study, I decided to been answered with any certainty, for the simple rea- make a serious attempt to establish a workable defi- son that mountains have remained essentially nition for mountains. I studied thousands of moun- undefined. tains and hills before I arrived at the conclusion There are some who may say defining mountains presented in this article. My research mainly focused is irnposstbte. However, the word "impossible" on Washington's Cascade Range, but I also studied should be used with great caution, especially within other sections of the Cascade Range, the Rockies, the climbing community. Furthermore, classifica- Sierra Nevada, Appalachians, Himalayas, Andes, tion systems are ubiquitous for such things as trees, Alps, British Isles, Alaska Range and numerous animals, rocks and clouds-and although not other geographic localities. perfect - these systems do help people better de- Mountain Definitions scribe and eventually understand the world around A mountain can be defined based upon the follow- us. ing three geographic parameters: A. Local Relief; B. Various geographers and geologists have stated Elevation; and C. Prominence. These three that a mountain must have: 1. 1,000 or 2,000 feet parameters are utilized in the mountain definitions of local relief; 2. Relatively steep slopes; and 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Snow, Ice and Permafrost Across Canada
    CHAPTER 5 Changes in Snow, Ice, and Permafrost Across Canada CANADA’S CHANGING CLIMATE REPORT CANADA’S CHANGING CLIMATE REPORT 195 Authors Chris Derksen, Environment and Climate Change Canada David Burgess, Natural Resources Canada Claude Duguay, University of Waterloo Stephen Howell, Environment and Climate Change Canada Lawrence Mudryk, Environment and Climate Change Canada Sharon Smith, Natural Resources Canada Chad Thackeray, University of California at Los Angeles Megan Kirchmeier-Young, Environment and Climate Change Canada Acknowledgements Recommended citation: Derksen, C., Burgess, D., Duguay, C., Howell, S., Mudryk, L., Smith, S., Thackeray, C. and Kirchmeier-Young, M. (2019): Changes in snow, ice, and permafrost across Canada; Chapter 5 in Can- ada’s Changing Climate Report, (ed.) E. Bush and D.S. Lemmen; Govern- ment of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, p.194–260. CANADA’S CHANGING CLIMATE REPORT 196 Chapter Table Of Contents DEFINITIONS CHAPTER KEY MESSAGES (BY SECTION) SUMMARY 5.1: Introduction 5.2: Snow cover 5.2.1: Observed changes in snow cover 5.2.2: Projected changes in snow cover 5.3: Sea ice 5.3.1: Observed changes in sea ice Box 5.1: The influence of human-induced climate change on extreme low Arctic sea ice extent in 2012 5.3.2: Projected changes in sea ice FAQ 5.1: Where will the last sea ice area be in the Arctic? 5.4: Glaciers and ice caps 5.4.1: Observed changes in glaciers and ice caps 5.4.2: Projected changes in glaciers and ice caps 5.5: Lake and river ice 5.5.1: Observed changes in lake and river ice 5.5.2: Projected changes in lake and river ice 5.6: Permafrost 5.6.1: Observed changes in permafrost 5.6.2: Projected changes in permafrost 5.7: Discussion This chapter presents evidence that snow, ice, and permafrost are changing across Canada because of increasing temperatures and changes in precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Thickness Measurements on the Harding Icefield, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Ice Thickness Measurements on the Harding Icefield, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska Natural Resource Data Series NPS/KEFJ/NRDS—2014/655 ON THIS PAGE The radar team is descending the Exit Glacier after a successful day of surveying Photograph by: M. Truffer ON THE COVER Ground-based radar survey of the upper Exit Glacier Photograph by: M. Truffer Ice Thickness Measurements on the Harding Icefield, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska Natural Resource Data Series NPS/KEFJ/NRDS—2014/655 Martin Truffer University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute 903 Koyukuk Dr Fairbanks, AK 99775 April 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrangell-St. Elias Alaska
    Wrangell - St. Elias National Park Service National Park and National Preserve U.S. Department of the Interior Wrangell-St. Elias Alaska The wildness of Wrangell-St. Elias National Park The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation vest harbor seals, which feed on fish and In late summer, black and brown bears, drawn and Preserve is uncompromising, its geography Act (ANILCA) of 1980 allows the subsistence marine invertebrates. These species and many by ripening soapberries, frequent the forests awe-inspiring. Mount Wrangell, namesake of harvest of wildlife within the park, and preserve more are key foods in the subsistence diet of and gravel bars. Human history here is ancient one of the park's four mountain ranges, is an and sport hunting only in the preserve. Hunters the Ahtna and Upper Tanana Athabaskans, and relatively sparse, and has left a light imprint active volcano. Hundreds of glaciers and ice find Dall's sheep, the park's most numerous Eyak, and Tlingit peoples. Local, non-Native on the immense landscape. Even where people fields form in the high peaks, then melt into riv­ large mammal, on mountain slopes where they people also share in the bounty. continue to hunt, fish, and trap, most animal, ers and streams that drain to the Gulf of Alaska browse sedges, grasses, and forbs. Sockeye, Chi­ fish, and plant populations are healthy and self­ and the Bering Sea. Ice is a bridge that connects nook, and Coho salmon spawn in area lakes and Long, dark winters and brief, lush summers lend regulati ng. For the species who call Wrangell­ the park's geographically isolated areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Kachemak Bay Research Reserve: a Unit of the National Estuarine Research Reserve System
    Kachemak Bay Ecological Characterization A Site Profile of the Kachemak Bay Research Reserve: A Unit of the National Estuarine Research Reserve System Compiled by Carmen Field and Coowe Walker Kachemak Bay Research Reserve Homer, Alaska Published by the Kachemak Bay Research Reserve Homer, Alaska 2003 Kachemak Bay Research Reserve Site Profile Contents Section Page Number About this document………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .4 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Introduction to the Reserve ……………………………………………………………………………………………..5 Physical Environment Climate…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Ocean and Coasts…………………………………………………………………………………..11 Geomorphology and Soils……………………………………………………………………...17 Hydrology and Water Quality………………………………………………………………. 23 Marine Environment Introduction to Marine Environment……………………………………………………. 27 Intertidal Overview………………………………………………………………………………. 30 Tidal Salt Marshes………………………………………………………………………………….32 Mudflats and Beaches………………………………………………………………………… ….37 Sand, Gravel and Cobble Beaches………………………………………………………. .40 Rocky Intertidal……………………………………………………………………………………. 43 Eelgrass Beds………………………………………………………………………………………… 46 Subtidal Overview………………………………………………………………………………… 49 Midwater Communities…………………………………………………………………………. 51 Shell debris communities…………………………………………………………………….. 53 Subtidal soft bottom communities………………………………………………………. 54 Kelp Forests…………………………………………………….…………………………………….59 Terrestrial Environment…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 61 Human Dimension Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers of the Canadian Rockies
    Glaciers of North America— GLACIERS OF CANADA GLACIERS OF THE CANADIAN ROCKIES By C. SIMON L. OMMANNEY SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD Edited by RICHARD S. WILLIAMS, Jr., and JANE G. FERRIGNO U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1386–J–1 The Rocky Mountains of Canada include four distinct ranges from the U.S. border to northern British Columbia: Border, Continental, Hart, and Muskwa Ranges. They cover about 170,000 km2, are about 150 km wide, and have an estimated glacierized area of 38,613 km2. Mount Robson, at 3,954 m, is the highest peak. Glaciers range in size from ice fields, with major outlet glaciers, to glacierets. Small mountain-type glaciers in cirques, niches, and ice aprons are scattered throughout the ranges. Ice-cored moraines and rock glaciers are also common CONTENTS Page Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J199 Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------- 199 FIGURE 1. Mountain ranges of the southern Rocky Mountains------------ 201 2. Mountain ranges of the northern Rocky Mountains ------------ 202 3. Oblique aerial photograph of Mount Assiniboine, Banff National Park, Rocky Mountains----------------------------- 203 4. Sketch map showing glaciers of the Canadian Rocky Mountains -------------------------------------------- 204 5. Photograph of the Victoria Glacier, Rocky Mountains, Alberta, in August 1973 -------------------------------------- 209 TABLE 1. Named glaciers of the Rocky Mountains cited in the chapter
    [Show full text]
  • A, Index Map of the St. Elias Mountains of Alaska and Canada Showing the Glacierized Areas (Index Map Modi- Fied from Field, 1975A)
    Figure 100.—A, Index map of the St. Elias Mountains of Alaska and Canada showing the glacierized areas (index map modi- fied from Field, 1975a). B, Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the St. Elias Mountains in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image from Mike Fleming, USGS, EROS Data Center, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, Alaska. K122 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD St. Elias Mountains Introduction Much of the St. Elias Mountains, a 750×180-km mountain system, strad- dles the Alaskan-Canadian border, paralleling the coastline of the northern Gulf of Alaska; about two-thirds of the mountain system is located within Alaska (figs. 1, 100). In both Alaska and Canada, this complex system of mountain ranges along their common border is sometimes referred to as the Icefield Ranges. In Canada, the Icefield Ranges extend from the Province of British Columbia into the Yukon Territory. The Alaskan St. Elias Mountains extend northwest from Lynn Canal, Chilkat Inlet, and Chilkat River on the east; to Cross Sound and Icy Strait on the southeast; to the divide between Waxell Ridge and Barkley Ridge and the western end of the Robinson Moun- tains on the southwest; to Juniper Island, the central Bagley Icefield, the eastern wall of the valley of Tana Glacier, and Tana River on the west; and to Chitistone River and White River on the north and northwest. The boundar- ies presented here are different from Orth’s (1967) description. Several of Orth’s descriptions of the limits of adjacent features and the descriptions of the St.
    [Show full text]