Keeching Notice.Rpt
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
5.6 Flood Risk Assessment Appendix N CAFRA Rlw Results 2019 Tidal.Xlsx”)
Portishead Branch Line (MetroWest Phase 1) TR040011 Applicant: North Somerset District Council 5.6, Flood Risk Assessment, Part 1 of 17 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009, regulation 5(2)(e) Planning Act 2008 Author: CH2M Date: November 2019 1-1 The original submission version of this document can be found in Appendix 17.1 of the ES. The document contained within the ES will not be updated. However, this standalone version of this document may be updated and the latest version will be the final document for the purposes of the Order. 1-2 Notice © Copyright 2019 CH2M HILL United Kingdom. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of CH2M HILL United Kingdom, a wholly owned subsidiary of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by Jacobs for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested. -
Severnside and Avonmouth Wetland Habitat Project Stage 1
South Gloucestershire Council, Bristol City Council & Natural England Severnside/Avonmouth Wetland Habitat Project Stage 1: Distribution of Wetland Birds within the Study Area October 2010 Report no:WX71453/C1453/ Final/V1 South Gloucestershire Council, Bristol City Council & Natural England Severnside/Avonmouth Wetland Habitat Project . Stage 1: Distribution of Wetland Birds within the Study Area Author: James Latham Checker: Phil Shepherd Approver: Samantha Walters Report no: WX71453/C1453/ Final/V1 Date: October 2010 This report has been prepared for client in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for The Project Partnership. Hyder Consulting cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. Cresswell Associates The Mill, Brimscombe Port, Stroud, Gloucestershire GL5 2QG Tel: +44 (0)1453 731231 Fax: +44 (0)1453 887979 Web: www.cresswell -associates.com Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 2 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Estuarine birds ........................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Desk study sources ................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Gap analysis .......................................................................................................... -
Severn Tidal Power - Sea Topic Paper
DECC SEVERN TIDAL POWER - SEA TOPIC PAPER Freshwater Environment and Associated Interfaces March 2010 Prepared by Prepared for Parsons Brinckerhoff Ltd DECC Queen Victoria House 3 Whitehall Place Redland Hill London Bristol SW1A 2HD BS6 6US In association with Black and Veatch Limited Report Title : Severn Tidal Power - SEA Topic Paper Report Status : FINAL Topic Name : Freshwater Environment and Associated Interfaces Date March 2010 Prepared by : A C D Groves Checked by : D. Toghill Approved by : D. Keiller Revision Status Date Issued Draft 0 5.1.10 (ex water quality, abstractions) A Draft 19.1.10 1 Issue to DECC 20.1.10 B Final Internal Review 15.3.10 2 Final Issue to DECC 30.3.10 CONTENTS Page ABBREVIATIONS III NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY VII SECTION 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Interfaces Between Topics and Other Work Conducted Within Feasibility Study 4 1.3 Consultation 4 1.4 SEA Objectives 6 SECTION 2 9 BASELINE ENVIRONMENT 9 2.1 Introduction 11 2.2 Methodologies Used to Develop the Baseline 16 2.3 Links to Existing Legislation and Policy 18 2.4 Baseline Environment 19 2.5 Key Environmental Issues and Problems 25 2.6 Value and Vulnerability of Receptors 25 SECTION 3 27 EVALUATION OF PLAN ALTERNATIVES 27 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Assessment Methodology 29 3.3 Alternative Options 32 3.4 Summary of Potentially Significant Issues 33 3.5 Assessment of Likely Significant Effects on the Environment 33 Alternative Option B3: Brean Down to Lavernock Point Barrage 34 Alternative Option B4: Shoots Barrage 45 Alternative Option B5: Beachley -
How Congresbury Has Grown
How Congresbury has grown A report for Congresbury Parish Council Authors: Tom Leimdorfer, Stuart Sampson Publication June 2015 Updated January 2018 Population and properties in Congresbury January 2018 [1] Congresbury Key Figures Population 3497 Age breakdown Source: Census 2011, National Office for Statistics Population and properties in Congresbury January 2018 [2] Household properties 1475 Population and properties in Congresbury January 2018 [3] How Congresbury has changed over 100 years The population of Congresbury grew by just over 450 people between 1901 and 1961. During the 60’s the population of the village doubled as by 1971, the census showed 3397 people. This can be seen in diagram 1. Diagram 1 – Total population reported in Congresbury1 A large part of this growth was due to the action of Axbridge Rural District Council in the post-war years to build the Southlands council estate to ensure that local working people had homes in which they could afford to live. Even at that time, when a cottage in the old part of the village became vacant it fetched a price which local young couples could not raise. The Rev. Alex Cran’s history of Congresbury recounts the tensions of the time. Opposition to the Southlands estate came from those who wanted ‘infill’ amongst the rest of the village, but such a scheme would have been too expensive (p216 ‘The Story of Congresbury’). Bungalows in Well Park were partly aimed at persuading older residents to move to smaller houses from Southlands and vacate the larger dwellings for families. Many homes in Southlands Way, Southside and Well Park are now privately owned. -
Dialect Words from North Somerset
YYCCCCCCAARRTT The future of the past T DIALECT WORDS FROM NORTH SOMERSET July 2015 version 2 Author: Vince Russett Yatton, Congresbury, Claverham and Cleeve Archaeological Research Team Place and Feature Names in Somerset Dialect, Occasionally Used in YCCCART Reports This article is dedicated to the memory of my father, Des Russett (1930-2014), who inspired in me not only a deep and abiding love of the countryside, but also a continuous curiosity about the world and the universe. Abstract The point has been (well) made that occasional West Country dialect terms find their way into YCCCART reports (it can sometimes be difficult to entirely remove oneself from one's roots!). This glossary will try to convey some of the meanings. Many of the words are still in common use, and like most Old English terms (and the occasional Old Cornish ones), they have nuances of meaning that are probably unappreciated outside of agricultural circles. Many of the terms also give rise to place-names. Some plant names are included, but I have shied away from the complex (and potentially dangerous) field of fungi. These terms occur infrequently and in context, and thus this article will almost certainly be updated from time to time. SE = Standard English Obs = obsolete Acknowledgements This report has been assembled with the (unwitting) knowledge of many farmers in the Northmarsh (a substantial proportion of whom I seem to have been at school with!) and beyond. Particular help was also given by current and former staff of the Somerset Record Office, Dr Michael Costen, the late Mr Keith Gardner, the late Mr Brian Olsen and others too numerous to name, but to whom I am eternally grateful for my personal context in West Country society. -
River Axe Biomass of Fish (All Species) 1991 Biomass (Gms/Square Metre) Iue 1 Figure
NRA/SLFAC/92/14 FISHERY SURVEY OF THE RIVER AXE CATCHMENT 1. INTRODUCTION This fishery survey of the River Axe was started in April 1991 and concluded in October 1991. The watercourses surveyed were the River Axe itself together with its major tributaries, namely the River Cheddar Yeo and the Hixham Rhyne. 2. TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY 2.1 The headwaters of the River Axe are actually on top of Mendip and enter swallet holes. The recognised source of the river is Wookey Hole, which is one of the main springs arising from the Mendip limestone. The river falls progressively for the first 2 kilometres and then divides artificially into two branches. The most southerly, known as the Lower River Axe is in fact higher following the contour line through several villages and historically feeding several mills with water. Burcott Mill has been restored and still functions as a water mill. The northerly branch runs through Wookey and creates two fords before reuniting with the southerly branch at the top of Vestbury Moor. 2.2 The Axe valley part of the Somerset Moors and Levels is underlain primarily by alluvial clay of freshwater, marine and brackish origin. Where the river crosses this alluvial valley it has been straightened and widened since 1800. In the early 19th century there was a major scheme which cut off numerous meanders. The Cheddar Yeo was also realigned at the same time. These alterations were so dramatic that what are now the lowest reaches of the Yeo were once part of the course of the Axe. -
Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118)
NELMS target statement for Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118) Your application is scored and a decision made on the points awarded. Both top priorities and lower priorities score points but you should select at least one top priority. Scoring is carried out by... Choosing priorities To apply you should choose at least one of the top priorities, and you can choose lower priorities - this may help with your application. Top priorities Priority group Priority type Biodiversity Priority habitats Priority species Water Water quality Flood and coastal risk management Historic environment Designated historic and archaeological features Undesignated historic and archaeological features of high significance Woodland priorities Woodland management Woodland planting Landscape Climate Change Multiple environmental benefits Lower priorities Priority group Priority type Lower priorities Water quality Archaeological and historic features Woodland Biodiversity - top priorities Priority habitats You should carry out land management practices and capital works that maintains, restores and creates priority habitats. Maintain priority habitat such as: • Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh • Lowland meadows • Lowland calcareous grassland Reedbeds Traditional orchard • Lowland dry acid grassland Wood Pasture and Parkland Restore priority habitats (especially proposals which make existing sites bigger or help join up habitat networks) such as: ● Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh • Lowland meadows • Lowland calcareous grassland Reedbeds Traditional -
Severn Estuary RCZAS Updated Project Design for Phase 2 Main
Severn Estuary Rapid Coastal Zone Assessment Survey Updated Project Design for Phase 2 Main Fieldwork for English Heritage (HEEP Project No. 3885) Toby Catchpole and Adrian M. Chadwick Version 2 Revised, March 2010 Contents List of figures ............................................................................................................ iii Project details ............................................................................................................ v Summary ................................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction and project background..................................................................1 2 Research aims and objectives ...........................................................................3 3 Summary of Phases 1 and 2a ...........................................................................5 3.1 Introduction .........................................................................................5 3.2 Sites identified as requiring further study in Phase 2a ......................... 5 3.3 The results of the Phase 2a fieldwork ................................................. 6 4 Project interfaces ...............................................................................................9 5 Communications and project products ............................................................. 11 6 Project review ..................................................................................................13 7 Health -
Breeding Birds of the Strawberry Line (Vale of Winscombe Section)
BREEDING BIRDS OF THE STRAWBERRY LINE (VALE OF WINSCOMBE SECTION) By Dr. Lincoln Garland Introduction The Strawberry Line, or Cheddar Valley Railway Line, is a footpath/cycleway extending for 10 miles along a dismantled railway corridor between Yatton and Cheddar in North Somerset. It is deeply cherished by neighbouring communities and I am very fortunate to have lived alongside it for the last six years. Over this time, I have become increasingly familiar with its natural seasonal rhythms, including those of its birdlife, which are the subject of this article. During the COVID-19 lockdown, I decided to make use of my permissible daily exercise to record the distribution of the breeding birds on my particular ‘patch’ of the Strawberry Line - the Vale of Winscombe section. This stretch of the Strawberry Line breaches the picturesque Mendip Hills between Sandford Station and Shute Shelve Tunnel, passing through the village of Winscombe halfway across (Figure 1). I was partly inspired into action by what I perceived to be a particularly high abundance of birdlife along the Strawberry Line in contrast with neighbouring relatively intensively managed farmland and even compared with some local Ancient woodlands, where birdsong often seems conspicuous by its absence. As a consequence of the lockdown and associated reduction in noise pollution, multiple media stories have described how the pace of life slowed for many people, who in turn became increasingly cognizant of their natural surroundings, and in particular of birdsong and the psychologically healing (biophilic) effect that nature’s soundscape can have. In telling the story of the Strawberry Line’s birdlife I hope that I can provide an added layer of interest for locals and visitors, which might also help in these difficult times deliver an enhanced dose of Vitamin N or Nature’s Fix, to borrow the biophilic terminology of Richard Louv (2017) and Florence Williams (2017) respectively. -
River Sowy and King's Sedgemoor Drain
River Sowy and King’s Sedgemoor Drain Enhancements Scheme: Phase 1 Environmental Statement ENVRESW001353-CH2-XX-400-RP-EN-1042 V3 August 2020 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Published by: Environment Agency Horizon house, Deanery Road Bristol BS1 5AH Email: enquiries@environme • Further copies of this report nt-agency.gov.uk are available from our www.environment- publications catalogue: agency.gov.uk http://publications.environmen t-agency.gov.uk or our © Environment National Customer Contact Agency 2018 Centre: T: 03708 506506 All rights reserved. • Email: This document may enquiries@environment- be reproduced with agency.gov.uk. prior permission of the Environment Agency. Quality Assurance Project name River Sowy and King’s Sedgemoor Drain Enhancements Scheme: Phase 1 Project SOP Code ENVRESW001353 Date 14/08/2020 Version number 3 Author Miriam Olivier, Will Maclennan Approvals Name Signature Title Date Version Simon Keys S J Keys Divisional Director 06/08/2020 2 Gary Cutts G B Cutts Lead Project Manager 14/08/2020 3 Statement of competency Environment leads Simon Keys, BSc, MSc (1990) Simon Keys has 30 years of experience in the fields of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Flood Risk Management as a consultant and regulator. -
Severn River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015-2021
Severn River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015-2021 PART B - Sub Areas in the Severn River Basin District December 2015 Published by: Environment Agency Natural Resources Wales Horizon house, Deanery Road, Cambria house, 29 Newport Road, Bristol BS1 5AH Cardiff CF24 0TP Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] www.gov.uk/environment-agency http://www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk Further copies of this report are available Further copies of this report are available from our publications catalogue: from our website: www.gov.uk/government/publications http://www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk or our National Customer Contact Centre: or our Customer Contact Centre: T: 03708 506506 T: 0300 065 3000 (Mon-Fri, 8am - 6pm) Email: [email protected]. Email: [email protected] © Environment Agency 2015 © Natural Resources Wales All rights reserved. This document may be All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the reproduced with prior permission of Natural Environment Agency. Resources Wales. ii Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................. iii Glossary and Abbreviations ................................................................................................ iv 1. The layout of this document .......................................................................................... 1 2. Sub-areas in the Severn River -
Yatton Yesterday No. 8 1991
YATTON E S T E R D A Y No: 8 ~ 1991 Yatton Local History Society Editorial Our front cover for 1991 depicts the Methodist Church in Yatton. Since we now have our bi-monthly meetings in the church hall, and have been made very welcome, we thought we would make this small tribute. As always, we are indebted to John Scally for the art work. Bob Young, though still a member, asked to be relieved of the position of President in which he has served us for four years. His help and advice to me as Chairman have been invaluable,as have his contributions to ‘Yatton Yesterday’; our grateful thanks, Bob. ‘A History of Yatton’, compiled by Marian Barraclough from research by Society members, is another milestone in the Society’s programme. Whilst not imposing on ‘Yatton Yesterday’, it provides a superb background to our individual researches. Books 1, 2 and 7 of ‘Yatton Yesterday’ have completely sold out; copies are available of 3, 4, 5 and 6. Our venture for 1992 will be to video the main events in the village during the year. Plans are at an early stage yet, but it is hoped to record Yatton’s history for posterity. Anyone interested in helping with this project please contact the Society. Our thanks are due once more to the local newsagents and Claverham Post Office for distributing ‘Yatton Yesterday’ free of charge. They have done this generously for seven years, and promise to help with this edition. Contributors from outside the Society continue to help us – our thanks to them.