Provisions Related to Filling a Vacancy in the Office of Lieutenant Governor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

CRC Notes 2008-04 A publication of the Citizens Research Council of Michigan November 2008 PROVISIONS RELATED TO FILLING A VACANCY IN THE OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR The 1963 Michigan Constitution makes clear the line ant governor as the president of the Michigan Sen- of succession to the office of the governor when a va- ate, the presiding official of the chamber. Twenty- cancy occurs. Under Article V, Section 26, the first five other states also grant this role to their lieuten- person to fill a gubernatorial vacancy is the constitu- ant governor. The lieutenant governor’s role and tionally-established lieutenant governor. However, responsibilities as the presiding officer of the Michi- the Constitution is silent with respect to filling a void gan Senate are prescribed by the rules of the body. in the office of lieutenant governor. The lack of spe- Further, Section 25 grants the lieutenant governor the cific constitutional provisions for filling a vacancy in power to cast the deciding vote in the event of a tie the office of lieutenant governor was a change from vote in the 38 member Michigan Senate, the only time the prior 1908 Constitution. that this official may vote. Roles of the Lieutenant Governor. The office of the Gubernatorial Succession. In Michigan, the office of lieutenant governor is created in Article V, Section 21 lieutenant governor is first in line of succession to the of the 1963 Constitution. Article V, Section 25 pro- governorship, a feature shared with 43 other states. vides that this office has both executive and legisla- (Note: Four states designate the senate presiding of- tive roles. The executive role of Michigan’s lieutenant fice as successor and three states have the secretary governor is largely ceremonial. The Constitution does of state as successor.) Vacancies in the office of gov- not invest this position with any unique executive ernor can occur as a result of impeachment, removal, branch powers as Article V, Section 1 vests all execu- resignation, or death. Following the lieutenant gover- tive power with the governor. The lieutenant gover- nor, the next in line is the elected secretary of state, nor may perform duties assigned by the governor un- the elected attorney general, and others as prescribed der Article V, Section 25; however, this section by law (Article V, Section 26).1 Section 67 of the Michi- prohibits the governor from delegating any of his/her gan Election Law (Public Act 116 of 1954) designates powers to the lieutenant governor. In the governor’s absence from the state (e.g., atten- dance at out-of-state meetings and foreign trade mis- 1 In the debate surrounding the construction of Section 26, sions) or in a case of the governor’s inability to serve delegates to the 1961 Constitutional Convention argued the (e.g., placed under anesthesia for medical procedures), importance of including the word “elected” before “secre- the powers of the governor first devolve to the lieu- tary of state” and “attorney general” to ensure that the line tenant governor. This is not equivalent to a scenario of succession to the governorship only consists of elected where the person elected to the position of lieuten- officials, as opposed to appointed ones. Section 21 gives the ant governor ascends to the office of the governor governor the authority to appoint individuals to fill vacan- because of a vacancy in that office. In the former case, cies in the offices of secretary of state and attorney general. the lieutenant governor serves temporarily as the gov- ernor whereas in the latter the lieutenant governor CRC Board of Directors becomes the governor until the next gubernatorial EUGENE A. GARGARO, Jr., Chair MARYBETH S. HOWE JEFFREY D. BERGERON, Vice Chair DANIEL T. LIS election. NICK A. KHOURI, Treasurer ALEKSANDRA A. MIZIOLEK BETH CHAPPELL PAUL OBERMEYER RICK DIBARTOLOMEO LYNDA ROSSI The lieutenant governor does not have any express TERENCE M. DONNELLY JERRY E. RUSH executive powers; however, the Michigan Constitu- RANDALL W. EBERTS MICHAEL A. SEMANCO DAVID O. EGNER TERENCE A. THOMAS, Sr. tion expressly provides this position with legislative W. FRANK FOUNTAIN AMANDA VAN DUSEN powers. Article V, Section 25 designates the lieuten- INGRID A. GREGG EARL M. RYAN, President CITIZENS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN MAIN OFFICE 38777 West Six Mile Road, Suite 208 n Livonia, MI 48152-3974 n 734-542-8001 n Fax 734-542-8004 LANSING OFFICE 124 West Allegan, Suite 1502 n Lansing, MI 48933 n 517-485-9444 n Fax 517-485-0423 CRCMICH.ORG CRC Notes the president pro tempore of the Mr. Faxon: Mr. Chairman, Mr. issues that merit exploration. Senate and the speaker of the King, if I may ask you a ques- Some issues are practical, dealing House of Representatives, in that tion; if the lieutenant governor with established governmental order, to follow the attorney gen- is the governor, then who is the procedures, while others are eral in the line of gubernatorial lieutenant governor? purely political. succession. Mr. King: Mr. Chairman, Mr. With respect to the practical con- The last time that a sitting Michi- Faxon, the lieutenant governor cerns, a vacancy in the office of gan governor vacated the office becomes the governor in the lieutenant governor would create was in 1969, when Governor event of the absence, disabil- a vacancy on the State Administra- George Romney resigned to be- ity, impeachment, or death of tive Board, a body which also con- come the Secretary of the U.S. the governor, and there is no sists of the governor, secretary of Department of Housing and Urban replacement for him.2 state, attorney general, treasurer, Development. William Milliken superintendent of public instruc- had been reelected lieutenant Lacking constitutional authority to tion, and transportation director. governor in 1966 with Governor fill vacancies in the office of lieu- This Board, created in state law in Romney and succeeded him as tenant governor, the office must 1921, has general supervisory con- governor on January 22, 1969. As remain unfilled until the next gu- trol over the administrative activi- a result, a vacancy in the office of bernatorial election. The void of ties of all state departments and lieutenant governor was created constitutional authority, however, agencies through contract and effective immediately upon does not apply to the role played lease approvals and claim settle- Milliken’s ascension to the gover- by the lieutenant governor as ments. Without the lieutenant norship and remained vacant un- president of the Michigan Senate. governor on the Board, the body til the next gubernatorial election In 1995, Michigan Attorney Gen- would consist of six members and in 1970. eral Frank Kelley opined that the tie votes could occur. A method Michigan Senate has the authority for breaking a tie would have to be Vacancies in the Office. Whereas to select its presiding officer in the developed. the Michigan Constitution pro- event of a vacancy in the office of vides a method for filling vacancies lieutenant governor.3 The role of Similarly, a void in the office of the in the other statewide elected ex- the person filling such a position president of the Senate would re- ecutive offices (e.g., governor, sec- would be limited to the duties of move the tie-breaking mechanism retary of state, and attorney gen- the presiding officer of the Michi- for votes. Senate rules do not con- eral), it is silent with respect to a gan Senate and would not com- template or provide for an alter- vacancy in the office of lieutenant prise other roles of the lieutenant native method for breaking an governor. Article V, Section 21 pro- governor, including breaking a tie equally divided vote, as the Michi- vides that vacancies in the offices vote. Senate rules contain an or- gan Constitution invests this au- of secretary of state and attorney dering of presiding officers in the thority solely with the lieutenant general are to be filled by guber- absence of the president of the governor. This is different from the natorial appointment, suggesting senate. voting procedure in the House of that the framers of the 1963 Con- Representatives, which consists of stitution intended vacancies in the Issues When a Vacancy Occurs. 110 members. In that body, an af- office of lieutenant governor to go A vacancy in the office of lieuten- firmative vote of a simple major- unfilled. This is confirmed by re- ant governor raises a number of ity (56 members) is required to viewing the official record of the pass a bill. Unlike the process in 1961 Constitutional Convention, the Michigan Senate, a tie vote in which contains an exchange be- 2 Official Record, 1961 the House does not go to a decid- th tween two delegates directly re- Constitutional Convention, Vol. II, p. ing 111 vote. An equally divided lated to this issue. 19 69. vote in the House constitutes a failed vote. 3 OAG 6849, 1995. 2 CRC Notes One political consideration that provision (Article VI, Section 10) to process in the Michigan House of arises when a lieutenant governor require the governor to appoint, Representatives does not provide ascends to the governorship re- with the consent of the Michigan a tie-breaking vote, which has not lates to the line of succession and Senate, a person to fill a vacancy rendered the legislative process in the political party affiliation of the in the office of the lieutenant gov- that chamber inoperable. individuals in that line. Without a ernor whenever one occurs. This lieutenant governor in place, the provision was not included in the Establishing a procedure for gu- secretary of state would assume 1963 Constitution.
Recommended publications
  • The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era

    The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era

    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
  • Rhode Island Office of Lt. Governor Statutory Duties

    Rhode Island Office of Lt. Governor Statutory Duties

    Rhode Island Office of Lt. Governor Statutory Duties As of September 6, 2016 Summary The Rhode Island lieutenant governor has eighteen (18) statutory duties. These duties include chairing three commissions and serving on four other boards, and making about 20 appointments to various boards and commissions. The lieutenant governor chairs councils on emergency management, small business and intergovernmental relations and impacts other areas from long term care and homelessness to interstate cooperation. Citations Statutory duties of Lieutenant Governor as prescribed by Rhode Island General Laws (RI Gen. Law): 1. Serve as Chair of the state Small Business Advisory Council (RI Gen. Law Section 42- 91-2). 2. Appoint three members to the Small Business Advisory Council (RI Gen. Law Section 42-91-2). 3. Serve as Chair of the Rhode Island Emergency Management Advisory Council (RI Gen. Law Section 30-15-6). 4. Serve as (or designate) a member of the Long-term Care Coordinating Council (RI Gen. Law Section 23-17.3-2). 5. Appoint seven (7) members of the Long-term Care Coordinating Council as prescribed by law (RI Gen. Law Section 23-17.3-2). 6. Appoint two members of the Plastic Recycling and Litter Commission (RI Gen. Law Section 21-27.1-3). 7. Appoint one member to the Pesticide Relief Advisory Board established (RI Gen. Law Section 23-25.2-3). 8. Serve as a member of the Martin Luther King, Jr. State Holiday Commission (RI Gen. Law Section 25-2-18.1). 9. Appoint three members of the Committee on Naval Affairs (RI Gen.
  • ANNEX 15-A Section 1: Central Government Entities

    ANNEX 15-A Section 1: Central Government Entities

    ANNEX 15-A Section 1: Central Government Entities 1. This Chapter applies to central government entities listed in each Party’s Schedule to this Section where the value of the procurement is estimated, in accordance with Article 15.1.6 and 15.1.7, to equal or exceed: (a) for procurement of goods and services: A$81,800 or US$58,550 (b) for procurement of construction services: A$9,396,000 or US$6,725,000. The monetary thresholds set out in subparagraphs (a) and (b) shall be adjusted in accordance with Section 8 of this Annex. Schedule of Australia1,2 1. Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Portfolio Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Dairy Adjustment Authority Biosecurity Australia 2. Attorney-General’s Portfolio Attorney-General’s Department Administrative Appeals Tribunal Australian Crime Commission Australian Customs Service Australian Federal Police AUSTRAC Classification Board Classification Review Board CrimTrac Agency Family Court of Australia Federal Court of Australia Federal Magistrates Court Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (ITSA) National Native Title Tribunal Office of Film and Literature Classification Office of Parliamentary Counsel Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions Office of the Privacy Commissioner 3. Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Portfolio Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts National Archives of Australia 15-A-1 4. Defence Portfolio Department of Defence3 Department of Veterans’ Affairs Defence Materiel Organisation 5. Education, Science and Training Portfolio Department of Education, Science and Training Australian Research Council 6. Employment and Workplace Relations Portfolio Department of Employment and Workplace Relations Australian Industrial Registry Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Agency Seafarers Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Authority (Seacare Authority) Office of Workplace Services 7.
  • A Guide to Titles and Forms of Address for Dignitaries

    A Guide to Titles and Forms of Address for Dignitaries

    OFFICIAL A GUIDE TO TITLES AND FORMS OF ADDRESS FOR DIGNITARIES How referred to in Title Address block in correspondence Salutation person Governor-General His Excellency General the Honourable David Hurley AC DSC (Retd) Your Excellency or Initially ‘Your Excellency’ Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia Dear Governor-General thereafter ‘Sir’ Contact: Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia Governor His Excellency The Honourable Hieu Van Le AC Your Excellency At first meeting ‘Your Governor of South Australia Excellency’ thereafter Contact: Governor of South Australia ‘Sir’ Premier The Honourable Steven Marshall MP Dear Premier Premier Premier of South Australia Contact: Premier of South Australia Prime Minister The Honourable Scott Morrison MP Dear Prime Minister Prime Minister or Prime Minister of Australia Mr Morrison Contact: Prime Minister of Australia Lieutenant Governor Professor Brenda Wilson AM Dear Professor Wilson Professor Wilson Lieutenant Governor of South Australia Contact: Lieutenant Governor of South Australia Chief Justice The Honourable Chief Justice Chris Kourakis Dear Chief Justice Chief Justice Chief Justice of South Australia Contact: Chief Justice of South Australia Government Ministers The Honourable (Dr if required) (first name) (surname) MP or MLC Dear Minister Minister or Minister Minister for xxx (surname) Contact: State Cabinet Ministers If addressing a Minister in their electorate office Dear Minister Minister or Minister The Honourable (Dr if required) (first name) (surname) MP or
  • The Monarchy in Prince Edward Island

    The Monarchy in Prince Edward Island

    The Monarchy in Prince Edward Island Canada’s History with the Royal Family per cent of the world’s people. Canada was created in 1867. By most standards, Canada, though a relatively young country, has a long- Constitutional Monarchy standing association with royal families. Thirty-two As a Constitutional Monarch, the Queen’s powers are kings and queens reigned over the country long before exercised by the Prime Minister or Premier who are Elizabeth II was crowned Queen of Canada. Canada responsible to the elected representatives of the people was explored, settled and grew during the reigns of in the House of Commons and the provincial British monarchs as far back as 1497. legislative assemblies. Though largely symbolic, the Crown is an integral part of our governmental Canada’s Governmental System structure. The Canadian Constitution limits the power and the Monarchy of the Crown in government, creating a primarily symbolic Canada is a federal state (that is, role for the Queen. Because the it has two levels of government, Queen resides in Britain, she is national and provincial) with a represented in Canada by the constitutional monarchy and a Governor General and in each of parliamentary democracy. Our the provinces by a Lieutenant head of state is the Queen of Governor. Canada. She is also the Queen of the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and many other Did You Know? countries within the British The Honourable Antoinette Perry Commonwealth of Nations. Acts is our current Lieutenant of parliament and many actions Governor. She was sworn into of our national and provincial office on October 20, 2017 and is nd governments are made in the the 42 Lieutenant Governor of name of the Queen, though the Prince Edward Island.
  • Chapter Vi the Occupants of Government House

    Chapter Vi the Occupants of Government House

    CHAPTER VI THE OCCUPANTS OF GOVERNMENT HOUSE Before giving a list of the occupants of Government House since it was first erected it would be desirable to set out briefly the various changes there have been in the ruler ship of Bengal and India since the beginning of British power. The oldest British Settlement in India is that of Fort St. George, Madras, the next being Bombay. The first British factories in Bengal were established in 1633 and from that date to 1700 the Bengal establishment was subordinate to Madras except for a period of two years between 1682 and 1684 when William Hodges was appointed independent Governor of Bengal. Bengal was made a Presidency in 1699 and the period of permanent independent Governors of Bengal started in 1700, the first being Job Charnock’s son-in-law. Sir Charles Eyre and the title that was held till 1774 was President in the Bay and Governor and Commander-in-Chief of Fort William in Bengal for the United East India Company. From 1699 therefore there were three Presidencies Madras, Bombay and Bengal, each of which, governed by a President or Governor with a Council, was entirely independent of the others and subordinate only to the Directors in London. The Trend of events happened to make Bengal, though the most junior in creation, the most important of the three politically, and by Lord North’s Regulating Act of 1773 the Governor of Fort William was given control over the other two Presidencies, his supremacy being indicated by a change of title to Governor General of the Presidency of Fort William in Bengal.
  • File:British North America Act 1867.Pdf

    ANNO TRICESIMO VTCTOR.LE REGIN.,E. +3Nk'**+'MM**s'#0M#++Wifly4JIa** ****** Mild,o-*.**Yi +Y2 41P*: !!ilF+t * *****ii** C A P. M. An Act for the Union of Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswvick, 'and the Government thereof;' and for Purposes connected therewith. [29th March 1867.] HEREAS the Provinces of Granada, Nova S'ootia, and : Now Bra wick have expressed their Desire to ' be federally united , into One Dominion under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great BrUai# and Ireland,, with a Consti- 'tution similar in Priuoiplf, to that of the United Kingdom And whereas such a Union would conduce to the Welfare of 'the Pi°ovihoes` and promote the Interests of the Brith Empire : 'And whereas on the Establishment of the 'Union by Authority of 'Parliament it is expedient, not only that the Constitution of the Legislative Authority in the Dominion be provided for, but also that the Nature of the Executive Government therein be declared : And whereas it is expedient that Provision be -made for the eventual Admission into the Union of other Parts` of British North, America : Be ' it therefore enacted and declared by the ' Queen's' most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual C, and, 10 30° VICTORI.E, Cap.3. British North America. and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same, as follows : I.-PRELIMINARY. Short Title. 1. This Act may be cited as The British North America Act, 1867. Application 2. The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen o`.' Provisions referring to extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and the Queen.
  • The Spouses of the Governors of Queensland Credits and Acknowledgements

    The Spouses of the Governors of Queensland Credits and Acknowledgements

    The Spouses of the Governors of Queensland Credits and Acknowledgements Cover design – portraits of the © The State of Queensland, Australia (Office of the Governor). spouses of the Governors of First edition published May 2018, revised edition published November 2018. Queensland since 1859. Copyright protects this publication except for purposes permitted by the The Office of the Governor expresses Copyright Act. Reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without prior its sincere gratitude to the State written permission of the Office of the Governor. Reference to this publication is Library of Queensland for granting permitted only with appropriate acknowledgement. permission to reproduce items from its photographic collection. Every effort has been made to ensure the information and facts in this book are The portrait of Lady Abel Smith is correct but the publishers hereby disclaim any liability for incorrect information. reproduced with permission from the Government House, Queensland – www.govhouse.qld.gov.au National Portrait Gallery, London. ISBN 978-0-646-98873-3. Contents Governor’s Foreword 2 Introduction 3 Lady Bowen 4 The Marchioness of Normanby 6 Lady Musgrave 8 Lady Norman 10 Lady Lamington 12 Lady Chermside 14 Lady Chelmsford 16 Lady MacGregor 18 Lady Goold-Adams 20 Lady Goodwin 22 Lady Wilson 24 Lady Lavarack 26 Lady Abel Smith 28 Lady Mansfield 30 Lady Hannah 32 Lady Ramsay 34 Lady Campbell 36 Mr Angus McDonald 38 Mrs Barbara Arnison 40 Mr Michael Bryce AM AE 42 Mr Stuart McCosker 44 Bachelors and Widowers 46 [1] Governor’s Foreword arly in 2014, Kaye was invited to speak at the official opening of the Annual EForum on Women and Homelessness, hosted by The Lady Musgrave Trust.
  • Some Observations on the Queen, the Crown, the Constitution, and the Courts Warren J Newman*

    Some Observations on the Queen, the Crown, the Constitution, and the Courts Warren J Newman*

    Some Observations on the Queen, the Crown, the Constitution, and the Courts Warren J Newman* Canada was established in 1867 as a Dominion Le Canada fut fondé en 1867 comme un under the Crown of the United Kingdom, with dominion sous la Couronne du Royaume-Uni, a Constitution similar in principle to that of the avec une constitution semblable en principe à celle United Kingdom. Th e concept of the Crown has du Royaume-Uni. Le concept de la Couronne evolved over time, as Canada became a fully a évolué au fi l du temps, au fur et à mesure independent state. However in 2017, Canada que le Canada est devenu un état entièrement remains a constitutional monarchy within what indépendant, mais en 2017 le Canada demeure is now the Commonwealth, and the offi ces of the une monarchie constitutionnelle à l’intérieur Queen, the Governor General, and the provincial de ce qui est maintenant le Commonwealth et Lieutenant Governors are constitutionally les fonctions de la Reine, du gouverneur général entrenched. Indeed, in elucidating the meaning et des lieutenants-gouverneurs des provinces ont of the Crown, an abstraction that naturally été constitutionnalisées. En fait, en élucidant le gives rise to academic debate and divergent sens de la Couronne, une abstraction qui donne perspectives, it is important not to lose sight of naturellement lieu à des débats théoriques et des the real person who is Her Majesty, given the points de vue divergents, il est important de ne importance that our constitutional framework pas perdre de vue la vraie personne qui est Sa attaches to her role, status, and powers.
  • The Crown in the Provinces: Canada's Compound Monarchy

    The Crown in the Provinces: Canada's Compound Monarchy

    THE CROWN IN THE PROVINCES: CANADA’S COMPOUND MONARCHY Michael Jackson and Lynda Haverstock1 Canada: a “compound monarchy” (Smith, D.E., 1995, 12). This succinct phrase by David E. Smith, dean of Canadian scholars of the Crown, neatly sums up a key dimension of the constitutional monarchy in Canada. We contend that the Crown is an institution belonging jointly to the central and provincial governments and that it is crucial to the co-sovereign status of the provinces in Confederation. It is, therefore, of vital interest to the Province of Quebec and holds promise for First Nations’ governance. This aspect of our nation’s constitutional monarchy merits far more examination by scholars and policy-makers than it has received. Attention to the Crown in Canada – and attention there has recently been – has focused primarily on the Office of the Governor General. In part, this stems from a spotlight on the federal vice-regal reserve powers of dissolution and prorogation in 2008 and 2009 (Russell and Sossin, 2009). In addition, there has been debate in the media about the appropriateness of using the term “Head of State” in reference to the Governor General. In most cases, those who call for the end of the monarchy ignore its vital provincial dimension. Few commentators have drawn attention to the provincial Crown and the Lieutenant Governors who embody it; among those few are Michael Valpy and Ian Holloway (Valpy 2009). The present paper will discuss what we call the “provincial Crown” and how it evolved. By doing so, we will make the case that it is integral to how Canada has evolved as a fascinating federation and that to ignore its significance diminishes thoughtful discourse on the nation’s strengths.
  • And Paradoxes of Self-Rule in the British Vugin Islands

    And Paradoxes of Self-Rule in the British Vugin Islands

    255 Writing Law, Making a "Nation": History, Modernity, and Paradoxes of Self-Rule in the British Vugin Islands Bill Maurer Law has become a key signifier in British Virgin Islander nationalist dis­ course. British Virgin Islanders cast law as central to their identity as a people and celebrate the self-authoring of law. At the same time law writing has fos­ tered continued colonial rule and subordination to the global market. The In­ ternational Business Companies Ordinance, hailed as the BVI's first truly self­ authored Jaw, produced a marketable identity for the territory in the world of international finance, yet led to increased surveillance by metropolitan powers and contributed to the deferral of political sovereignty. This article considers the role of law in modem narratives of national uniqueness. It explores the paradox that modem law, with its accompanying rhetoric of progress, its forma­ tions of history, and its construction of "national" selves, is central to the cul­ tural politics of difference, yet is also central to the processes of capitalist inte­ gration that both deny and demand difference. Among natives and immigrants residing in the British Vir­ gin Islands (BVI) , talk about government is commonplace. Often the talk is about corruption, favoritism, or ineptitude. But just as often it is proud, praising the legislature and its actions and ordi­ nances as expressing the BVI's uniqueness as a nation with its own national traditions and cultural distinctiveness. British Vir­ gin Islanders (or "BVlslanders," as they call themselves) distin­ guish themselves from their Caribbean neighbors as a "law and order" people.
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 11 March 2021

    General Assembly Distr.: General 11 March 2021

    United Nations A/AC.109/2021/1 General Assembly Distr.: General 11 March 2021 Original: English Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples American Samoa Contents Page The Territory at a glance ......................................................... 3 I. Constitutional, legal and political issues ............................................ 4 II. Budget ....................................................................... 6 III. Economic conditions ............................................................ 7 A. General ................................................................... 7 B. Fisheries and agriculture .................................................... 8 C. Tourism .................................................................. 8 D. Transport and communications ............................................... 9 E. Water, sanitation, utilities and renewable energy ................................. 9 IV. Social conditions ............................................................... 10 A. General ................................................................... 10 B. Labour and immigration ..................................................... 10 C. Education ................................................................. 11 D. Public health .............................................................. 11 E. Crime and public safety ..................................................... 13 V. Environmental