DOCSLIB.ORG

Jesus – God and Man

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jesus – God and Man Jesus – God and Man The Journey Toward Understanding Part six: Union of Natures I. A Tale of Two Cities “It sounds crude when put this way, but there can be no getting around the fact that both Antioch and Alexandria looked hungrily to Constantinople and sought to have their „favorite sons‟ rise to high positions as chaplains, presbyters, deacons and even as bishop – patriarch of Constantinople – in order to enhance their own city‟s reputation and influence and in order that their own distinctive brand of theology might be promoted.” (Roger E. Olson, The Story of Christian Theology, 202) A. Alexandria 1. Alexandrian Politics Named for Alexander the Great • Thriving center of education, trade, commerce in first century • By fifth century, focused on winning Constantinople 2. Alexandrian Christology “The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us.” (John 1:14) • Christ took flesh – emphasis on human nature, subject to weakness, disease, death • Jesus is one person, a unity of Word/flesh “Word-flesh” Christology B. Antioch 1. Antiochene Politics • Great center of commerce in first century • Term “Christian” first used in Antioch • Paul began missionary journeys in Antioch 2. Antiochene Christology • Jesus is fully divine, fully human (Nicene orthodoxy) • Saw eternal Word of God uniting with a man (not merely taking human nature) • Jesus is actually two persons – the Second Person of the Trinity, and a human man “Word-man” Christology II. Nestorius (381-451) on the Humanity and Divinity of Jesus Christ A. Nestorius’ Christology • 428, Nestorius made Bishop of Constantinople (Antiochene in Christology) Theotokos “God-bearer” • Term used to emphasize divinity of Jesus “When Mary gave birth to her little boy, she gave birth to God.” (Roger E. Olson, The Story of Christian Theology) • Christmas, 428 – Nestorius condemns Theotokos as term to describe Mary God is changeless – God cannot be born any more than He can die! Suggested Christotokos as alternative “[Nestorianism believed] that although Jesus Christ was one person (God and man united), his two natures (one human and one divine) existed side by side and hence were separable.” (“Nestorianism” in Stanley J. Grenz, David Guretzki, and Cherith Fee Nordling, Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms) B. Problems with Nestorius’ Christology Nestorianism makes Jesus a split personality, a schizophrenic • Makes the two natures of Christ separable Jesus the man is separate from Christ the Word! • The man suffered, the Word did not • The man was born, the Word was not • The Word is worthy of worship, the man is not The Son of God did not truly become human and experience human existence. He knew a mediated human existence, through the man Jesus. “…in both adoptionism and Nestorianism the Son of God never actually enters into human existence. The human person in the Nestorian conjunction remains not only distinct in nature but also a distinct person from the Son of God.” (Roger E. Olson, The Story of Christian Theology, 216) III. Cyril of Alexandria (d444) and the “Hypostatic Union” A. The Key Terms of Cyril’s Position • Bishop of Alexandria, 1. “Nature” 412-444 Refers to that which makes a thing what it is “Complex of attributes” 2. “Person” Person (duh). Greek hypostasis – an individual, and entity 3. “Hypostatic Union” Uniting both of Christ‟s natures in a single hypostasis. Two natures, one Person B. The Christology of Cyril of Alexandria • Cyril does not believe that a nature requires its own person • The eternal Word of God is a person with a divine nature • In the “incarnation,” this divine person took a human nature (i.e., the full range of human attributes) but not a separate human person • The result: One person (Son of God) with two natures (one divine, one human) IV. The Council of Ephesus (431) Emperor Theodosius II (apparently during his teenage years, when acne was a problem) Don‟t blink – this gets messy! • Cyril and the Alexandrians arrived on time; Nestorius and the Antiochenes were late; Council proceeded nonetheless, condemned Nestorius. Affirmed “One and the same is the eternal Son of the Father and the Son of the Virgin Mary, born in time after the flesh; therefore she may rightly be called Mother of God.” (Aloys Grillmeier, S.J., Christ in Christian Tradition) • Then Nestorius and Antiochenes arrived, met independently, condemned Cyril • Then delegates from West/Rome arrived, met independently, condemned Nestorius • Ultimately, Theodosius II forced the Council of Ephesus to affirm… Christ is one Person, with two natures .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi: the Doctrine of the Theotokos As a Liturgical Creed in the Coptic Orthodox Church
    Journal of Coptic Studies 14 (2012) 47–62 doi: 10.2143/JCS.14.0.2184687 LEX ORANDI, LEX CREDENDI: THE DOCTRINE OF THE THEOTOKOS AS A LITURGICAL CREED IN THE COPTIC ORTHODOX CHURCH BY BISHOY DAWOOD 1. Introduction In the Surah entitled “The Table Spread” in the Quran, Mohammed, the prophet of Islam, proclaimed a long revelation from God, and in a part that spoke of the role of Mary and teachings of Jesus, the following was mentioned: “And behold! Allah will say: ‘O Jesus the son of Mary! Did you say to men, ‘worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah’?’” (Sura 5:116).1 It is of note here that not only the strict mono- theistic religion of Islam objected to the Christian worshipping of Jesus as God, but it was commonly believed that Christians also worshipped his mother, Mary, as a goddess. This may have been the result of a mis- understanding of the term Theotokos, literally meaning “God-bearer”, but also means “Mother of God”, which was attributed to Mary by the Christians, who used the phrase Theotokos in their liturgical worship. Likewise, in Protestant theology, there was a reaction to the excessive adoration of the Virgin Mary in the non-liturgical devotions of the churches of the Latin West, which was termed “Mariolatry.” However, as Jaroslav Pelikan noted, the Eastern churches commemorated and cel- ebrated Mary as the Theotokos in their liturgical worship and hymnology.2 The place of the Theotokos in the liturgical worship of the Eastern Chris- tian churches does not only show the spiritual relation between the Virgin Mother and the people who commemorate her, but it is primarily a creedal affirmation of the Christology of the believers praying those hymns addressed to the Theotokos.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Personal Salvation in the Theology of North American Evangelicalism: on the Road to a Theology of Social Justice
    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) 1980 An Examination of Personal Salvation in the Theology of North American Evangelicalism: On the Road to a Theology of Social Justice Robert F.J. Gmeindl Wilfrid Laurier University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gmeindl, Robert F.J., "An Examination of Personal Salvation in the Theology of North American Evangelicalism: On the Road to a Theology of Social Justice" (1980). Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 1421. https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1421 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT AN EXAMINATION OF PERSONAL SALVATION IN THE THEOLOGY OF NORTH AMERICAN EVANGELICALISM: ON THE ROAD TO A THEOLOGY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE by Robert F.J. Gmeindl The question under consideration is the effect of the belief in personal salvation on the theology of North American Evangelicalism, for the purpose of developing a theology of social justice. This study is a preliminary investigation of the history of Evangelical individualism and the potential influence that individualism might have on Evangelical theology. Certain trends toward isolation and separation, as well as a tendency to neglect what I have called systemic evil, are examined to see how they may result from the Evangelical stress on individualism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trinity in Contemporary Theology: Questioning the Social Trinity Norman Metzler
    Volume 67:3/4 July/October 2003 Table of Contents Eugene F. A. Klug (1917-2003)........................ 195 The Theological Symposia of Concordia Theological Seminary (2004) .................................... 197 Introduction to Papers from the 2003 LCMS Theological Professors' Convocation L. Dean Hempelmann ......................... 200 Confessing the Trinitarian Gospel Charles P. Arand ........................ 203 Speaking of the Triune God: Augustine, Aquinas, and the Language of Analogy John F. Johnson ......................... 215 Returning to Wittenberg: What Martin Luther Teaches Today's Theologians on the Holy Trinity David Lumpp .......................... 228 The Holy Trinity and Our Lutheran Liturgy Timothy Maschke ....................... 241 3; The Trinity in Contemporary Theology: P $ Questioning the Social Trinity 3 P Norman Metzler ........................ 270 a ? Teaching the Trinity ! David P. Meyer ......................... 288 11 The Bud Has Flowered: Trinitarian Theology I in the New Testament Michael Middendorf ..................... 295 The Challenge of Confessing and Teaching the Trinitarian Faith in the Context of Religious Pluralism A. R. Victor Raj ......................... 308 The Doctrine of the Trinity in Biblical Perspective David P. Scaer .......................... 323 Trinitarian Reality as Christian Truth: Reflections on Greek Patristic Discussion William C. Weinrich ..................... 335 The Biblical Trinitarian Narrative: Reflections on Retrieval Dean 0.Wenthe ........................ 347 Theological
    [Show full text]
  • Early Church Fathers and Adoptionism
    Early Church Fathers and Adoptionism Sample statements Because of the nature of adoptionism its central question inevitably is when did humanity blend with divinity? (All emphasis added). Shepherd of Hermas (dated from AD 85-165) "The Holy Pre-existent Spirit. Which created the whole creation, God made to dwell in flesh that he desired. This flesh, therefore, in which the Holy Spirit dwelt, was subject unto the Spirit, walking honorably in holiness and purity, without in any way defiling the Spirit. When then it had lived honorably in chastity, and had labored with the Spirit, and had cooperated with it in everything, behaving itself boldly and bravely, he chose it as a partner with the Holy Spirit; for the career of this flesh pleased [the Lord], seeing that, as possessing the Holy Spirit, it was not defiled upon the earth. He therefore took the son as adviser and the glorious angels also, that this flesh too, having served the Spirit unblamably, might have some place of sojourn, and might not seem to have lost the reward for its service; for all flesh, which is found undefiled and unspotted, wherein the Holy Spirit dwelt, shall receive a reward." Theodotus via Hippolytus of Rome (d. AD 235) Refutation of All Heresies, Book VII, Chapter 23. “The Heresy of Theodotus” “But there was a certain Theodotus, a native of Byzantium, who introduced a novel heresy. He announces tenets concerning the originating cause of the universe, which are partly in keeping with the doctrines of the true Church, in so far as he acknowledges that all things were created by God.
    [Show full text]
  • Wesleyan Spirit-Christology
    Wesleyan Spirit-Christology: inspiration from the theology of Samuel Chadwick Full version of a paper presented at the Oxford Institute of Methodist Theological Studies, August 2018 by George Bailey, [email protected] Lecturer in Mission and Wesleyan Studies, Cliff College, Derbyshire, UK Presbyteral Minister in Leeds North and East Methodist Circuit, UK Introduction This paper explores the theology of Samuel Chadwick (1860-1932) and demonstrates that within it there is a Spirit Christology in a Wesleyan framework. Spirit Christology has been the subject of theological investigation in recent decades, with proposals being made for ways to add to or adapt the more dominant Logos Christologies of the Western theological tradition so that the work of the Holy Spirit in Jesus in the Gospels, and in the experience of Christians, can be better accounted for.1 Chadwick’s theology is brought into debate with this more recent conversation, and is found to be in many ways in line with the Spirit Christology being proposed. This is not an aspect of Chadwick’s theology that has been given attention previously and new suggestions are made as to his place in the tradition of Wesleyan theology. In the process, Chadwick’s sources are considered, including the ways that he draws on a Wesleyan theology of perfection, mid to late nineteenth century language of Pentecost and baptism of the Spirit, early twentieth century liberal Protestant theological work, and his potential relationship with the seventeenth century puritan, John Owen. Most academic interest in Chadwick to date has focused on more practical issues. However, although Chadwick was primarily concerned with holiness and evangelism, it was only by the work of Holy Spirit that he experienced these being effective in his life and the life of churches, and consequently the Holy Spirit constituted the main content of his teaching to prepare people for evangelism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Atonement in the Theology of Jacobus Arminius
    JETS 53/4 (December 2010) 773–85 THE NATURE OF ATONEMENT IN THE THEOLOGY OF JACOBUS ARMINIUS j. matthew pinson* Jacobus Arminius is one of the best known and least studied theologians in the history of Christianity. His writings have been neglected by Calvinists and Arminians alike. Calvinists have disliked him because of his opposition to scholastic predestinarian theology. Most Arminians have neglected him because what little they have read of him reminds them more of Calvinism than they like. Arminius scholar Carl Bangs is correct when he says that most modern treatments of Arminius assume a definition of Arminianism that does not come from Arminius. Bangs states that most interpreters of Arminianism begin with a preconception of what Arminius should be expected to say, then look in his published works, and do not find exactly what they are looking for. They show impatience and disappointment with his Calvinism, and shift the inquiry into some later period when Arminianism turns out to be what they are looking for—a non-Calvinistic, synergistic, and perhaps semi-Pelagian system.1 This is the approach many scholars have taken toward Arminius regard- ing his doctrine of atonement. For example, the Calvinist scholar Robert L. Reymond has said that the Arminian theory of atonement is the governmental theory, which “denies that Christ’s death was intended to pay the penalty for sin.” He claims that the governmental theory’s “germinal teachings are in Arminius.”2 Similarly, well-known Wesleyan-Arminian scholar James K. Grider states: “A spillover from Calvinism into Arminianism has occurred in recent decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Early-Christianity-Timeline.Pdf
    Pagan Empire Christian Empire 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1 AD Second 'Bishop' of Rome. Pupil of Student of Polycarp. First system- Bishop of Nyssa, brother of Basil. Pope. The Last Father of the Peter. Author of a letter to Corinth, atic theologian, writing volumi- Bishop of Original and sophisticated theologi- model of St Gregory the Church. First of the St John of (1 Clement), the earliest Christian St Clement of Rome nously about the Gospels and the St Irenaeus St Cyprian Carthage. an, writing on Trinitarian doctrine Gregory of Nyssa an ideal Scholastics. Polymath, document outside the NT. church, and against heretics. and the Nicene creed. pastor. Great monk, and priest. Damascus Former disciple of John the Baptist. Prominent Prolific apologist and exegete, the Archbishop of Constantinople, St Leo the Pope. Able administrator in very Archbishop of Seville. Encyclopaedist disciple of Jesus, who became a leader of the most important thinker between Paul brother of Basil. Greatest rhetorical hard times, asserter of the prima- and last great scholar of the ancient St Peter Judean and later gentile Christians. Author of two St Justin Martyr and Origen, writing on every aspect stylist of the Fathers, noted for St Gregory Nazianzus cy of the see of Peter. Central to St Isidore world, a vital link between the learning epistles. Source (?) of the Gospel of Mark. of life, faith and worship. writing on the Holy Spirit. Great the Council of Chalcedon. of antiquity and the Middle Ages. Claimed a knowledge and vision of Jesus independent Pupil of Justin Martyr. Theologian.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary, Mother of God
    MARY, MOTHER OF GOD I. Mary, the Mother of Jesus Mariology is based upon the intimate bond that links Jesus with Mary: she is his mother. The NT testifies to this fact. She is first mentioned in the Bible not by name, but as the mother who gives Jesus his earthly life. Through her he becomes our brother, shares our life, and makes us share in the son ship of God” “God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those under the law that we might receive the full rights as sons.” -Mary’s life is hidden in the humility of Nazareth. The exalted language of our liturgical celebrations should not estrange her from our human world. We encounter her first as the maid of Nazareth who is called to a task totally beyond her understanding: to share in God’s design for the renewal of our human family. Her greatness lies in the silent faith with which she surrenders herself to a vocation which was hidden in God’s love: “Blessed is she who believed!” -According to modern biology, Mary is more closely related to Jesus than in the older view. Through her, and through her alone, Jesus becomes heir of the lineage of inheritance which leads back to the origin of the human family, to “Adam, who is from God” (Lk 3:38). This is the significance of Luke’s genealogy. -The psychological dependence of the child on the mother leads to the psychological bond, the intimate communion between mother and child.
    [Show full text]
  • A Too-Future Eschatology? the Limits of the Phenomenology of Liturgy in Jean-Yves Lacoste
    Open Theology 2019; 5: 386–402 Phenomenology of Religious Experience III: Visuality, Imagination, and the Lifeworld Jan Černý* A Too-Future Eschatology? The Limits of the Phenomenology of Liturgy in Jean-Yves Lacoste https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0028 Received May 04, 2019; accepted September 06, 2019 Abstract: The article first outlines Jean-Yves Lacoste’s phenomenological description of “liturgy”, i.e. the encounter between God and the human being. It argues that Lacoste’s rejection of the religious apriori on the side of the human being and emphasis on God’s transcendence and otherness leads to decontextualization of the experience of Christian faith, as his strongly future eschatology does not allow for the real transformation of both the individual and social lives of believers. In the second step, the article gives two counterexamples to Lacoste’s attitude that represent an attempt to recontextualize the experience of Christian faith within concrete historical and cultural coordinates. The examples come from the work of American theologian William Cavanaugh and Czech philosopher Robert Kalivoda, whose focus lies in the hermeneutics of a sacramental experience and the question of the history-making of Christian faith. Cavanaugh recontextualizes the understanding of the sacramental experience in terms of globalization. Kalivoda interprets the transformation of Christian eschatological ideas into a program of real social changes with special attention devoted to the Hussite revolution of the 15th century and the Hussite conception of the Lord’s Supper. The article concludes that Kalivoda’s emphasis on present eschatology stands in opposition to Lacoste’s emphasis on future eschatology, whereas Cavanaugh holds a middle position with balanced emphasis on both poles of Christian eschatology.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecumenical Councils Preparing for Next Week (Disciple 6–Eucharist 1)
    January St. Dominic’s RCIA Program Disciple The Church: 15 History & Teaching 4 Goal • Having switched the Disciple 4 & 5 weeks, we looks at an overview of the Sacraments last week (Disciple 5), and explored the Sacraments of Baptism and Confirmation. These Sacraments are two of the three that initiate us into the Church community, and into Christ’s body and mission. This week we’ll continue to unpack the meaning of Church by looking broadly at its history one the last 2000 years. We’ll also explore it’s role as Teacher. How does the Church function in and through history? How does God walk with the Church through it all? Agenda • Welcome/Housekeeping (10) • Questions & Answers • Introduction to the Rosary (15) Discussion (15): • If the Church is The Body of Christ, what does this mean for Christ’s presence in the world through history and in the world today? • What do I admire about the Catholic Church’s activity in history? Does any part of the Church’s activity in history disturb or upset me? • How do I (might I) listen to what the Church has to say today? What is my approach/attitude to the Church as “Teacher”? • Presentation: The Church: History (35) • Break (10) • Presentation: The Church: Teaching & Belief (30) • Discussion (time permitting): • What is special to this moment in history? • What is the Good News of Christ & the Church that speaks to this moment in history? • How can the body of Christ proclaim & witness the Gospel and walk with others today? Housekeeping Notes • Rite of Acceptance: February 10th at the 11:30am and 5:30 Masses.
    [Show full text]
  • Feast of the Holy Family of Jesus, Mary and Joseph
    Sunday, December 29, 2019 Feast of the Holy Family of Jesus, Mary and Joseph “...For the Son of Man has come to seek and to save what was lost.” Luke 19:10 Feast of the Holy Family—December 29, 2019 Saint Andrew the Apostle Parish Page 2 Journeying Together as a Family of God Today, December 29, 2019 Stewardship—doing the work of Christ N0 CCD December 15, 2019 Christmas Vespers—Sunday, December 29, 6:30pm Weekly Income $ 5,786.50 Office Closed—Wednesday, January 1, 2020 Online $ 1,359.50 $ 7,146.00 Solemnity of Mary, Holy Mother of God—A Holy Weekly Budget $ 8,000.00 Day of Obligation—Masses are on Tuesday, December Weekly Deficit ($ 854.00) 31, 5:00pm and Wednesday, January 1, 9:30am Poor Box $ 64.65 Next Weekend, January 4/5, 2019 Minister Schedule Confession—Sunday, 7-7:45am This week: 12/29: Charles E. Willhide; For the Family of Angelo CCD Classes—Sunday Barberio, Jean Wishard, For the Intentions 9:30-10:45am for Kindergarten—8th grade of Chessie Mathews & Family, Jim, 10:50 thru 11am Mass for 3yr & 4yr Preschool Jackson, and Kathleen Schlossnagle, Joseph and Kathy Stepulaitus, Nina Miller, Youth Group—Regular Meeting, Sunday, January 5, 6— 8pm Alaina Sullivan Ingels, Mary West Kritikos, Maxine Cool, Jenna Holderness, Richard Epiphany Vespers—Sunday, January 5, 5:30pm E. Bouder, Jordan Green, Atlee Constable; followed by the Epiphany Dinner at 6:00pm Tammy Miller, Intentions of Linda & Russ Brezler; Caroline Shreck, Robert Willhide, James Bowling, Minister Schedule Robert & Anna Topper, George Myers, Paul Walter, Jr., Trevor If you are unable to serve, please find a George, Intentions of the Button Family, Fred Arena, Maureen substitute.
    [Show full text]
  • When Mary Met Muhammad: the Qur'an As Reception History of the Annunciation to the Mary Jessica Markwood Harding University
    Tenor of Our Times Volume 5 Article 6 Spring 2016 When Mary Met Muhammad: The Qur'an as Reception History of the Annunciation to the Mary Jessica Markwood Harding University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.harding.edu/tenor Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Markwood, Jessica (Spring 2016) "When Mary Met Muhammad: The Qur'an as Reception History of the Annunciation to the Mary," Tenor of Our Times: Vol. 5, Article 6. Available at: https://scholarworks.harding.edu/tenor/vol5/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Humanities at Scholar Works at Harding. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tenor of Our Times by an authorized editor of Scholar Works at Harding. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHEN MARY MET MUHAMMAD: THE QUR’AN AS RECEPTION HISTORY OF THE ANNUNCIATION TO MARY By Jessica Markwood Eighth century tradition tells of the Prophet Muhammad storming into Mecca to destroy more than 360 gods housed in the Ka’aba so that he may reclaim the holy site for a new monotheistic religion. He cleared the sanctuary of every idol and icon – all but one. Only an image of the Virgin Mary and Jesus remained.1 This was no oversight. Instead it acknowledged a veneration of the Virgin that spanned across Christendom and the emergent Islamic world. Mary went on to become an integral character of Muslim religion, being the only woman to have a surah named after her and the only woman mentioned by name in the Qur’an.2 While the Quranic Mary narrative finds parallels in the canonical Gospels, it has several additions that reveal a connection to apocryphal Christian traditions present in pre-Islamic Arabia and Arab polemics that would validate the proto-Muslim community.
    [Show full text]