Corporate Presentation February 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corporate Presentation February 2020 Premium Value. Corporate Leading Free Cash Flow. Independent. Presentation Canadian Natural. February 2020 Delivering Value & Growth SNAPSHOT 2018 2019F 2020B Capital expenditures – net (C$ million)(1) $4,731 $3,800 $4,050 Annualized dividend (C$/share)(2) $1.34 $1.50 Production (annual average, before royalties) Crude Oil (Mbbl/d) 821 839 - 888 910 - 970 Natural gas (MMcf/d) 1,548 1,485 - 1,545 1,360 - 1,420 BOE (MBOE/d) 1,079 1,087 - 1,146 1,137 - 1,207 Company Gross Reserves, before royalties, of crude oil and natural gas (as at December 31, 2018)(3) Proved crude oil and NGLs (MMbbl) 8,784 Proved natural gas (Bcf) 6,652 Proved BOE (MMBOE) 9,893 Proved and probable BOE (MMBOE) 13,382 (1) 2019F excludes costs related to the Devon Canada asset acquisition which closed on June 27, 2019. (2) 2019F and 2020B based on current quarterly dividend of $0.375 per common share. (3) Excludes Devon Canada asset acquisition, which closed on June 27, 2019. Note: See Advisory for pricing assumptions and cautionary statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS • Industry Leading Free Cash Flow Page 4 • Robust, Economic Long Life Low Decline Assets Page 8 • Increasing, Sustainable Returns to Shareholders with Significant Upside Page 11 • Asset Overview Page 13 • Marketing Page 22 • Balance Sheet Strength Page 24 • Long Term Sustainability Page 25 Corporate Presentation February 2020 The Canadian Natural Advantage Delivering in Today’s Environment Industry Leading Free Cash Flow Capital Discipline and Operational Excellence Robust, Economic, Long Life Low Decline Assets Increasing, Sustainable Returns to Shareholders with Significant Upside LEADING FREE CASH FLOW 2 Canadian Natural Large, Long Life Low Decline asset base UNIQUE Effective and efficient operations o Area knowledge o Extensive infrastructure ownership o Operatorship of core areas SUSTAINABLE o Environmentally and socially responsible operations Defined growth / value enhancement plans by product and basin Flexible capital allocation to maximize value ROBUST Strong Balance Sheet supports investment grade credit ratings Opportunistic acquisitions LEADING FREE CASH FLOW 3 1 Corporate Presentation February 2020 Balanced, Diverse Portfolio • Balanced, diverse production mix • International exposure North America North Sea • Vast, balanced resource base to develop • Growing, sustainable adjusted funds flow • ~48% light crude oil and SCO production Offshore Africa 2020 Budget* BOE Production Mix Liquids Production Mix Natural Gas Conventional & ~20% Oil Sands Unconventional Mining & Upgrading ~23% (SCO) ~36% Long Life Low Decline Heavy ~77% Crude Oil ~32% Light Crude *Based upon mid-point of 2020B production guidance. Oil & NGLs ~12% BALANCED PRODUCT MIX PROVIDES FLEXIBILITY 4 2019F Production per Share Growth Top 15 Companies (%) 66% 20% 6 of 14 peers delivered: > 7% production per share growth 15% 10% Group Average 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% Peers include: APA, CHK, COP, CVE, CVX, DVN, ECA, EOG, HSE, IMO, NBL, OXY, SU and XOM. Note: Production per share growth based upon Q1/19 to Q4/19F. Q4/19F production based upon Bloomberg consensus data as at November 13, 2019. Deliverable of ~7% based upon approximate group average. TOP TIER PRODUCTION PER SHARE GROWTH 5 2 Corporate Presentation February 2020 2020F Free Cash Flow Yield Top 15 Companies (%) 20% 18% 3 of 14 peers delivered: 16% > 7.5% free cash flow yield; & 14% > 7% production per share growth 12% 10% 8% Group Average 6% 4% 2% 0% Peers include: APA, CHK, COP, CVE, CVX, DVN, ECA, EOG, HSE, IMO, NBL, OXY, SU and XOM. CHK shown as zero due to share price change. Source: Goldman Sachs Energy Comp – November 11, 2019. Deliverable of ~7.5% based upon approximate group average. TOP TIER FREE CASH FLOW YIELD 6 Share Repurchases – Trailing 12 Months Top 15 Companies ($ million) $6,000 2 of 14 peers delivered: $5,000 > $1.2 billion share repurchase; > 7.5% free cash flow yield; & $4,000 > 7% production per share growth $3,000 $2,000 Group Average $1,000 $0 Peers include: APA, CHK, COP, CVE, CVX, DVN, ECA, EOG, HSE, IMO, NBL, OXY, SU and XOM. Source: Bloomberg data as at November 13, 2019. Deliverable of C$1.2 billion based upon approximate group average. Data based upon reported Q4/18 to Q3/19 repurchases. BALANCED SHARE REPURCHASES 7 3 Corporate Presentation February 2020 Dividend Growth – 10 Year CAGR Top 15 Companies (%) Canadian Natural and only 20% 1 of 14 peers delivered: > 10% 10 year CAGR dividend; 15% > $1.2 billion share repurchase; Group Average > 7.5% free cash flow yield; & 10% > 7% production per share growth 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% (23%) (100%) Peers include: APA, CHK, COP, CVE, CVX, DVN, ECA, EOG, HSE, IMO, NBL, OXY, SU and XOM. Source: 10 year CAGR based upon 2010 to current 2019 quarterly dividend annualized. Bloomberg data as at November 13, 2019. Deliverable of ~10% based upon approximate group average of Companies with positive growth. INDUSTRY LEADING DIVIDEND GROWTH 8 Industry Leading Free Cash Flow 4 Corporate Presentation February 2020 Balance & Optimize the Four Pillars of Capital Allocation Maximizing Shareholder Value Balance Resource Returns to Opportunistic Sheet Value Shareholders Acquisitions Strength Growth FLEXIBLE CAPITAL ALLOCATION MAXIMIZES SHAREHOLDER VALUE 10 2019 Track Record What CNQ Delivered on our Four Pillars • Returns to Shareholders ‒ Distributed ~$2.7 billion to shareholders in 2019 . ~$941 million of common shares repurchased in 2019 . Increased quarterly dividend 12% over 2018 levels ~$1.7 billion annualized • Balance Sheet Strength ‒ ~$2.3 billion debt retired(1) ‒ Debt : EBITDA (2.0x ~1.9x)(2) ‒ Debt : Book Capital (39% ~38%)(2) • Resource Value Growth ‒ Maintained disciplined capital budget $3.8 billion(3) ‒ 2019 entry to 2019 exit BOE production growth ~13% (~15% per share)(4) • Opportunistic Acquisitions ‒ Execution on significant value adding acquisition (1) Includes public debt retirement of C$1 billion and ~C$1.3 billion retirement of non-revolving term loan. (2) December 31, 2018 to forecasted year ending 2019 debt metrics, including major acquisition. (3) Excludes acquisition costs. (4) 2019 entry to exit production growth calculated as average targeted Q4/19 production versus average Q1/19 actual production. Q4/19 targeted production reflects Government of Alberta curtailment at November announced levels. UNEQUALLED ABILITY TO DELIVER ON OUR FOUR PILLARS 11 5 Corporate Presentation February 2020 Canadian Natural 2020 Execution Priorities • Disciplined capital budget focused on free cash flow generation • Margin Growth and Asset Development ‒ Thermal in situ and Oil Sands Mining & Upgrading capture synergies ‒ Progress projects that add production/value in 2020 and beyond . Aligned with increased market access • Adhere to free cash flow allocation policy ‒ Increasing returns to shareholders ‒ Continue to strengthen the Balance Sheet • Enhance capital flexibility ‒ ~$1,565 million Conventional & Unconventional assets ‒ ~$2,485 million Long Life Low Decline assets SAFE, SUSTAINABLE, EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT OPERATIONS 12 Canadian Natural 2020 Budget 2020 Capital Budget ($ million) 2019F 2020B Total (1) $3,800 $4,050 Targeted Production 2019F 2020B % Change(2) Natural Gas (MMcf/d) 1,485 - 1,545 1,360 - 1,420 (8%) Total Liquids (Mbbl/d)(3) 839 - 888 910 - 970 9% Total MBOE/d 1,087 - 1,146 1,137 - 1,207 5% (1) 2019F excludes asset acquisition costs. (2) Percent change of 2020B midpoint over 2019F midpoint. (3) Reflects planned downtime for turnaround activities and Canadian Natural’s 70% ownership in the AOSP. Note: Rounded to the nearest 1,000 bbl/d. Numbers may not add due to rounding. STRONG PRODUCTION PER SHARE GROWTH OF ~9% 13 6 Corporate Presentation February 2020 Canadian Natural Leading Free Cash Flow ($ billion) $9.0 $8.0 $7.0 $6.0 $5.0 $4.0 $3.0 $2.0 $1.0 Dividend Dividend(1) Dividend(1) $0.0 2018 2019F(2) 2020B Capital ($ billion) $4.7 $3.8 $4.05 Free Cash Flow +$5.00 WTI Incremental Free Cash Flow (1) Based upon current dividend. (2) Excludes acquisition costs. Note: Free cash flow represents adjusted funds flow less capital. See Advisory for cautionary statements, definitions and pricing assumptions. SUSTAINABLE FREE CASH FLOW 14 2020B Free Cash Flow Generation The Canadian Natural Opportunity ($ billion) $8.0 Adjusted Funds Flow ~$10.5 billion $7.0 Less: Budgeted Capital ~$4.05 billion ~$1.7 billion Less: Current Dividends* $6.0 Free Cash Flow $5.0 ~$4.8 billion $4.0 $3.0 Balance Sheet Share Strength Repurchases $2.0 ~$2.4 billion ~$2.4 billion $1.0 WTI +$2.50 WTI +$5.00 WTI +$7.50 Free Cash Flow *Based upon 2019 dividends paid. Dividends have historically been reviewed in the first quarter of the year. Incremental Free Cash Flow Note: See Advisory for cautionary statements, definitions and pricing assumptions. SIGNIFICANT TORQUE TO COMMODITY PRICE 15 7 Corporate Presentation February 2020 Robust, Economic, Long Life Low Decline Assets Balanced Model – Production per Share Basis Price Impact on Production & Value • Assets deliver free cash flow in low • Production per share price environment grows at a higher rate • Free cash flow allocation policy results in share repurchases • Production per share continues to grow • Production per share grows at a higher rate Conventional & Unconventional Production Commodity Price Long Life Low Decline Production Production per Share Rate Share per Production Commodity Price Commodity Time DELIVERS FREE CASH FLOW THROUGH THE CYCLE 17 8 Corporate Presentation February 2020 Canadian Natural’s Advantage Low Corporate Decline Rate BOE Production Mix
Recommended publications
  • Athabasca Oil Sands Project Acquisition March 9, 2017
    Athabasca Oil Sands Project Acquisition March 9, 2017 ATHABASCA OIL SANDS PROJECT ACQUISITION March 9, 2017 PREMIUM VALUE. DEFINED GROWTH. INDEPENDENT. Agenda • Transaction ‒Significant Opportunity ‒Overview & Metrics ‒Operational Impact • Asset Overview ‒Summary & Upside Opportunities ‒Mines ‒Upgrader ‒Infrastructure Pipelines ‒Quest Carbon, Capture, & Storage (“CCS”) ‒Other Oil Sands Assets • Opportunities to Create Value • Finance ‒Summary of Financial Impact ‒Financing Plan • Conclusion CNQ 2 1 Athabasca Oil Sands Project Acquisition March 9, 2017 Forward Looking Statements Certain statements relating to Canadian Natural Resources Limited (the “Company”) in this document or documents incorporated herein by reference constitute forward-looking statements or information (collectively referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the words “believe”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “plan”, “estimate”, “target”, “continue”, “could”, “intend”, “may”, “potential”, “predict”, “should”, “will”, “objective”, “project”, “forecast”, “goal”, “guidance”, “outlook”, “effort”, “seeks”, “schedule”, “proposed” or expressions of a similar nature suggesting future outcome or statements regarding an outlook. Disclosure related to expected future commodity pricing, forecast or anticipated production volumes, royalties, operating costs, capital expenditures, income tax expenses and other guidance provided, constitute forward-looking statements. Disclosure
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas Imports and Exports Second Quarter Report 2020
    DOE/FE- 0622 Natural Gas Imports and Exports Second Quarter Report 2020 Prepared by: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Regulation, Analysis, and Engagement Division of Natural Gas Regulation Map shows the Exports of Domestically-Produced LNG Delivered by Vessel. (Cumulative starting from February 2016 through June 2020.) NATURAL GAS IMPORTS AND EXPORTS SECOND QUARTER REPORT 2020 Division of Natural Gas Regulation Office of Regulation, Analysis, and Engagement Office of Oil & Natural Gas Office of Fossil Energy U.S. Department of Energy 202-586-7991 [email protected] Table of Contents Summary ......................................................................................... 1 1 Quarterly Summary ...................................................................... 3 Maps of Imports & Exports by Point of Entry/Exit ........................................ 5 Graphical Summaries & Comparisons ............................................................ 11 Tabular Summaries & Comparisons ............................................................... 23 1a Quarter in Review ........................................................................................................................ 25 1b All Import/Export Activities YTD 2020 vs. YTD 2019 ........................................................... 26 1c All Import/Export Activities 2nd Quarter 2020 vs. 1st Quarter 2020 ..................................... 27 1d All Import/Export Activities 2nd Quarter 2020 vs. 2nd Quarter 2019 .................................... 27
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Variation in Oil Sands Pipeline Projects
    Canadian Journal of Political Science (2020), 1–20 doi:10.1017/S0008423920000190 RESEARCH ARTICLE/ÉTUDE ORIGINALE Explaining Variation in Oil Sands Pipeline Projects Amy Janzwood* Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, 100 St. George, Toronto ON, M5S 3G3 *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]. Abstract While the vast majority of oil pipeline projects in Canada have been successfully built, several mega oil sands projects within and passing through Canada have been cancelled or significantly delayed. This article explains why these delays and cancellations have occurred. A systematic cross-case analysis is used to provide insight into the changing politics of oil sands pipelines. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is used to identify combinations of causal conditions that co-occur across cases of proposed new oil pipelines and pipeline expansion projects. The pipeline projects were proposed to the federal regulator—the National Energy Board—between 2006 and 2014. The QCA reveals that social mobilization and major regulatory barrier(s) are necessary conditions in explaining variation in pipeline project outcomes. The analysis of sufficiency reveals more complex configurations of conditions. This article contributes to the literature on the politics of oil sands pipelines by using a comparative approach to identify the impacts of socio-polit- ical and legal dynamics that have emerged around pipelines in the last 15 years. Résumé Cet article explique les raisons pour lesquelles plusieurs propositions récentes de méga- pipelines à l’intérieur du Canada et passant à travers le pays ont été annulées ou considérablement retardées. Alors que la grande majorité des projets d’oléoducs ont été construits avec succès, plusieurs mégaprojets de sables bitumineux ont été mis de côté ou ont subi des retards importants.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production and Supply Costs Outlook (2016 – 2036)
    Study No. 159 September 2016 CANADIAN CANADIAN CRUDE OIL AND NATURAL GAS ENERGY PRODUCTION AND SUPPLY COSTS OUTLOOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE (2016 – 2036) Canadian Energy Research Institute | Relevant • Independent • Objective CANADIAN CRUDE OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION AND SUPPLY COSTS OUTLOOK (2016 – 2036) Canadian Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production and Supply Costs Outlook (2016 – 2036) Authors: Laura Johnson Paul Kralovic* Andrei Romaniuk ISBN 1-927037-43-0 Copyright © Canadian Energy Research Institute, 2016 Sections of this study may be reproduced in magazines and newspapers with acknowledgement to the Canadian Energy Research Institute September 2016 Printed in Canada Front photo courtesy of istockphoto.com Acknowledgements: The authors of this report would like to extend their thanks and sincere gratitude to all CERI staff involved in the production and editing of the material, including but not limited to Allan Fogwill, Dinara Millington and Megan Murphy. *Paul Kralovic is Director, Frontline Economics Inc. ABOUT THE CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The Canadian Energy Research Institute is an independent, not-for-profit research establishment created through a partnership of industry, academia, and government in 1975. Our mission is to provide relevant, independent, objective economic research in energy and environmental issues to benefit business, government, academia and the public. We strive to build bridges between scholarship and policy, combining the insights of scientific research, economic analysis, and practical experience. For more information about CERI, visit www.ceri.ca CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE 150, 3512 – 33 Street NW Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A6 Email: [email protected] Phone: 403-282-1231 Canadian Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production and Supply Costs Outlook iii (2016 – 2036) Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry
    The Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry Prepared For Prepared By Executive Summary Introduction Despite the current difficulties facing the global economy as a whole and the oil and natural gas industry specifically, the Gulf of Mexico oil and natural gas industry will likely continue to be a major source of energy production, employment, gross domestic product, and government revenues for the United States. Several proposals have been advanced recently which would have a major impact on the industry’s activity levels, and the economic activity supported by the Gulf of Mexico offshore oil and natural gas industry. The proposals vary widely, but for the purpose of this report three scenarios were developed, a scenario based on a continuation of current policies and regulations, a scenario examining the potential impacts of a ban on new offshore leases, and a scenario examining the potential impacts of a ban on new drilling permits approvals in the Gulf of Mexico. Energy and Industrial Advisory Partners (EIAP) was commissioned by the National Ocean Industry Association (NOIA) to develop a report forecasting activity levels, spending, oil and natural gas production, supported employment, GDP, and Government Revenues in these scenarios. The scenarios developed in this report are based solely upon government and other publicly available data and EIAP’s own expertise and analysis. The study also included profiles of NOIA members to demonstrate the diverse group of companies which make up the offshore Gulf of Mexico oil and natural gas industry as well as a list of over 2,400 suppliers to the industry representing all 50 states.
    [Show full text]
  • Information As of 25 February 2013)
    UNITED STATES (Information as of 25 February 2013) Date of deposit of instrument of ratification/acceptance or date of accession Deposit of instrument of ratification/acceptance: December 8, 1998 Entry into force of the Convention: February 15, 1999 Entry into force of implementing legislation: November 10, 1998 Implementing legislation Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. Other relevant laws, regulations, or decrees that have an impact on a country’s implementation of the OECD Convention or the Recommendations - The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA) of 2000 made it possible to seek civil and criminal forfeiture of the proceeds of foreign bribery. - The President signed an executive order in March 2002 designating the European Union’s organizations and Europol as public international organizations, making bribery of officials from these organizations a violation of the FCPA. - The U.S. Sentencing Commission promulgated amendments, effective November 2002, making violations of the FCPA and violations of the domestic bribery law subject to the same sentencing guidelines. - The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 made violations of foreign bribery laws as predicate offences under the Money Laundering Control Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1956, required internal reporting systems at public companies, and created whistleblower protections for employees of public companies who provide evidence of fraud. - The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 enhanced whistleblower protections and authorized the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to pay rewards to whistleblowers who provide the SEC with original information that leads to successful SEC enforcement actions and certain related actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts About Alberta's Oil Sands and Its Industry
    Facts about Alberta’s oil sands and its industry CONTENTS Oil Sands Discovery Centre Facts 1 Oil Sands Overview 3 Alberta’s Vast Resource The biggest known oil reserve in the world! 5 Geology Why does Alberta have oil sands? 7 Oil Sands 8 The Basics of Bitumen 10 Oil Sands Pioneers 12 Mighty Mining Machines 15 Cyrus the Bucketwheel Excavator 1303 20 Surface Mining Extraction 22 Upgrading 25 Pipelines 29 Environmental Protection 32 In situ Technology 36 Glossary 40 Oil Sands Projects in the Athabasca Oil Sands 44 Oil Sands Resources 48 OIL SANDS DISCOVERY CENTRE www.oilsandsdiscovery.com OIL SANDS DISCOVERY CENTRE FACTS Official Name Oil Sands Discovery Centre Vision Sharing the Oil Sands Experience Architects Wayne H. Wright Architects Ltd. Owner Government of Alberta Minister The Honourable Lindsay Blackett Minister of Culture and Community Spirit Location 7 hectares, at the corner of MacKenzie Boulevard and Highway 63 in Fort McMurray, Alberta Building Size Approximately 27,000 square feet, or 2,300 square metres Estimated Cost 9 million dollars Construction December 1983 – December 1984 Opening Date September 6, 1985 Updated Exhibit Gallery opened in September 2002 Facilities Dr. Karl A. Clark Exhibit Hall, administrative area, children’s activity/education centre, Robert Fitzsimmons Theatre, mini theatre, gift shop, meeting rooms, reference room, public washrooms, outdoor J. Howard Pew Industrial Equipment Garden, and Cyrus Bucketwheel Exhibit. Staffing Supervisor, Head of Marketing and Programs, Senior Interpreter, two full-time Interpreters, administrative support, receptionists/ cashiers, seasonal interpreters, and volunteers. Associated Projects Bitumount Historic Site Programs Oil Extraction demonstrations, Quest for Energy movie, Paydirt film, Historic Abasand Walking Tour (summer), special events, self-guided tours of the Exhibit Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Roundtable
    Energy Roundtable Oil & Gas Outlook: Brazil, Angola, Mozambique and Mexico September 18, 2019 Norman Nadorff Bruno Belchior Francisco Mendez Alexandre Chequer Gonçalo Falcão Paulo Rage Introduction • Welcome to the second annual Brazil, Angola, Mexico & Mozambique (“BAMM”) Round Table. • These are four key countries in the oil and gas industry upon which our energy practice group expends much effort for our clients. • A lot has changed (both positively and negatively) in the prior year in the BAMM countries and our panelists will discuss those changes. • As the end of a decade approaches, we focus on the 20’s and whether they will likely be roaring or boring for the oil industry in each country. • There will be a Q&A session at the end. Please hold questions until then to assure we adequately cover the major BAMM issues. 2 BRAZIL O&G Figures and Prospects Different E&P Regimes Concession Regime Law 9,478/1997 (Petroleum Law). Applicable to all blocks other than the pre-salt and strategic areas. Open access through competitive bids, individually or in consortium / Farm-in and Farm-out Production Sharing Regime Law 12,351/2010 (PSA Law). Pre-Salt and strategic areas. Open access through competitive bids individually or in consortium (Petrobras has preferential rights to hold 30% PI and to be the Operator) / Direct Contracting of Petrobras / Farm- in and Farm-out. Transfer of Rights (“ToR”) Law No. 12,276/2010 (ToR Law). Created by the Brazilian Government for the capitalization of Petrobras - assigned E&P rights in pre-salt areas to Petrobras under very attractive government takes.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial to Harold Alvin Gorrell 1924-1985 C
    Memorial to Harold Alvin Gorrell 1924-1985 C. A. S. BULMER Sproule Associates Limited, P.O. Box 181, Calgary, Alberta T2P3N3 Canada H. A. (Al) Gorrell died in a fire which swept through the Regent Hotel in Manila. Philippines, on February 12. 1985. On a consulting assignment with the Asian Development Bank for Sproule Associates Limited, he had stopped off in Manila to visit bank officers on his return from a visit to a gas field in Pakistan. Al Gorrell was born January 30, 1924, in Crystal City, Manitoba, where he attended primary school and his first two years of high school. After completing senior matriculation at the high school in Geraldton. Ontario, Al enlisted in the Royal Canadian Air Force in 1942 and served as an aircrew Flying Officer with Bomber Command in England. At the end of World War 11, he returned to Ontario and entered the Univer­ sity of Toronto where he received a B.A. (honours geology) in 1950 and an M.A. (stratigraphy) in 1952. During 1951 and 1952, Al worked as a petroleum geologist for Imperial Oil Limited in Chatham, Ontario, then headed west to Regina in August 1952 to join Tidewater Oil Company as a senior stratigrapher. During that time he began his early research into subsurface waters and their chemistry and studies of evaporite deposits. These studies were his continuing specialty, for which he attained a well-deserved reputation as a most knowledgeable expert. In January 1957, Al came to Calgary where he joined Sproule Associates Limited. During his long career with Sproule, he worked in all phases of petroleum geology and also continued his research and studies in evaporite and industrial minerals and subsurface waters, including studies of geothermal potential.
    [Show full text]
  • PERC Remitter Listing (As of 08/14/2020)
    PERC Remitter Listing (as of 08/14/2020) Abacus Union LLC Action Gas, Inc Advanced Propane Inc Aeropres Corporation Alliance Energy Svcs LLC Alliance Gas Company AltaGas Marketing (U.S.) Inc. Alternative Fuels Inc. American Midstream LLC Amerigas AmeriGas Propane, Inc. Amerigas Propane, L.P. Anadarko (Western Gas Resources, Inc) Andeavor Field Services Arrakis Energy Marketing LLC Atlas Gas Products, Inc AUX Sable Liquid Products Aux Sable Liquid Products LP B and B Propane Big West Oil LLC Blue Racer Midstream LLC BP Energy Company Bridge Energy LLC Buck Peak Plant Buckeye Energy Calumet Montana Refining, LLC Calumet Specialty Products Canada Imperial Oil Ltd Canadian Enterprise Gas Products Ltd. Carolina Wholesale Gas Co Inc. Centennial Energy, LLC Chevron Products Company CHS, Inc. Citadel Gas Marketing, LLC CityServiceValcon LLC. Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing LLC Colorado Interstate Gas Company Concord Energy Countrymark Cooperative, Inc. CRC Marketing Inc Crestone Peak Resources Operating Crestwood Services, LLC Crysta Flash Ltd Partnership of Michigan Crystal Flash LTD Partnership of Michigan Custom Energy Construction, Inc. D & C Transportation DAMSCO Damsco DCP Midstream LLC DCP NGL Services, LP Dead River Company Delek US Devon Gas Services (NGL), L.P Devon Gas Services, L. P. DGP Concho, L.P. Dixie Pipeline Company Dome Pipeline Corporation Dominion Transmission, Inc. Downstream Management Services Eastern Propane Gas & Oil El Paso Production Oil and Gas Gathering Elbow River Marketing Limited Partnership Elkhorn Gas Processing LLC Enable Midstream Partners, LP Enable Products LLC Enlink NGL Marketing Company Enterprise Products Marketing Enterprise Products Operating L.P. EQT Energy, LLC Equilon Enterprises, LLC Escambia Operating Co LLC ExxonMobil ExxonMobil Corporation Ezzie's Wholesale Inc Factor Energy (U.S.) Inc Factor Gas Liquids Inc Farstad Oil Inc Fauser Oil Co., Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Athabasca Oil Corporation Announces Fourth Quarter and Year End 2017 Results
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 7, 2018 Athabasca Oil Corporation Announces Fourth Quarter and Year End 2017 Results CALGARY – Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH) (“Athabasca” or the “Company”) is pleased to provide its fourth quarter and year end results. Over the last three years, Athabasca has transitioned from an early‐stage exploration company into a sustainable intermediate producer with a strong cash flow outlook. During 2017, the Company successfully integrated a cornerstone Thermal Oil asset, achieved scale in its Light Oil Division and recapitalized its balance sheet. Corporate margins have improved significantly through liquids‐rich Montney growth, funded Duvernay development and low‐decline Thermal Oil assets that generate free cash flow. Athabasca achieved record production and cash flow in 2017 which has led to an internally funded capital program in 2018 and supports significant future free cash flow generation. The Company is uniquely positioned as a low‐decline, oil‐weighted producer with assets in the best plays in Western Canada. Corporate Q4 2017 and Year End Highlights Record Production o Q4 volumes of 42,064 boe/d (87% liquids) o 2017 volumes of 35,421 boe/d (90% liquids), representing ~200% growth year over year Material Cash Flow Growth o Q4 adjusted funds flow of $41.8 million ($0.08/share) o 2017 adj. funds flow of $102.1 million ($0.20/share), an increase of ~$200 million year over year Corporate Reserves Underpin Significant Value o 2P reserves increased to 1,246 mmboe, representing ~370% growth year over year
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Sands Performance Report 2015
    OIL SANDS PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015 Shell Canada Ltd. April 22, 2016 OIL SANDS PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015 OIL SANDS PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015 INTRODUCTION This is Shell Canada’s seventh consecutive report on performance in our oil sands operations. We publish this update annually to share detail on our efforts and progress in developing Alberta’s oil sands in an economically, socially and environmentally responsible way. This report is intended for those who have interest in our performance and a desire to better understand oil sands development and its significant importance to Shell and to Canada. Further information about our oil sands operations is available at www.shell.ca/oilsands ABOUT THE DATA The data presented here covers the areas of safety, environment, reclamation and community and provides information on Shell’s operating performance for 2015 for: ■ Muskeg River and Jackpine Mines; ■ Scotford Upgrader; ■ Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Facility; and ■ Peace River and Cliffdale In Situ operations Unless otherwise noted, all data presented for the Muskeg River Mine, Jackpine Mine, Scotford Upgrader and Quest Facility is in reference to total Athabasca Oil Sands Project (AOSP) performance before division amongst joint venture owners. The AOSP is a joint venture operated by Shell, and owned among Shell Canada Energy (60%), Chevron Canada Limited (20%), and Marathon Oil Canada Corporation (20%). Data presented for In Situ operations is 100% Shell share. All monetary amounts referred to in the data are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. SHELL CANADA LTD. | 2 OIL SANDS PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015 SAFETY Safety is a core value we work hard to instill in our people — both employees and contractors.
    [Show full text]