Dynamics of Hand-Held Impact Weapons Sive De Motu

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dynamics of Hand-Held Impact Weapons Sive De Motu V5.0 July 22, 2002 Dynamics of Hand-Held Impact Weapons Sive De Motu George L Turner Association of Renaissance Martial Arts http://www.thehaca.com 1 FOREWORD 5 MOMENT OF INERTIA 7 Derivation of Mass Moment of Inertia 8 The Parallel Axis Theorem 10 The Effects of the Moment of Inertia 11 Extra, For People with Too Much Time on their Hands 15 Building a Feel Simulator 16 Minimum and Maximum Obtainable Moment of Inertia 18 Building Practical Simulators 19 SIMPLE MOTIONS 20 Acceleration of the Center of Mass 20 Applied Couples 22 Simple Maneuver Equation 24 SIMPLE IMPACTS 26 Reaction Forces at a Fixed Pivot Point 26 The Definition of Percussion 28 More on Pivot Forces 30 Hand Reaction Forces 32 COMPLEX MOTIONS 34 Centrifugal Forces During a Swing 34 Conservation of Angular Momentum 38 Energy Transfer 39 The Instantaneous Center of Rotation 39 My Earlier Thoughts on Hand Shock 41 APPLICATIONS OF PERCUSSION POINT THEORY 43 Visualizing the Feel 47 Another Insight Into Feel 48 2 Mass Impact Weapons 50 The Axe’s Percussion Point 50 Percussion Points of Weapons with Tapered Mass 53 THE POMMEL 60 The Pommel’s Effects on Moment of Inertia 61 Selecting a COM Position 64 Comparing a Pommel to a Tang Extension 66 A Pendulum’s Percussion Point 68 Adding a Pommel to a Pendulum 71 CALCULATING REQUIRED POMMEL MASS 75 The Effect of Blade Mass Taper on Pommel Mass 78 Why Balance Points Vary On Authentic Swords 82 OBJECTS IN ROTATION AND TRANSLATION 84 Physical Properties of an Object in Rotation and Translation 84 Inertia 84 Derivation of Inertia Along a Blade 85 The Pommel and Apparent Inertia 90 Effect of Blade Taper on Apparent Inertia 94 Simple Calculation of a Sword’s Tip Inertia 96 Calculation of the Inertia at Various Points on a Staff 99 Sword Edge Velocity and Apparent Momentum 101 Sword Edge Kinetic Energy 103 HANDS-FREE IMPACTS 106 Post-Impact Linear and Angular Velocities of the Sword 107 Linear Impulse 108 Graphical Analysis of Impacts 110 Applying the Collision Results 112 Variations in Closing Velocity 113 Mass of the Target 117 Elasticity of the Target 119 3 IMPACTS WITH HANDS 122 Building an Impact Model 124 Impacts Past the Hand’s Percussion Point 125 THE MODES AND NODES OF VIBRATION 130 Energy in the standing waves 131 Energy in higher harmonics 132 Velocity of the side-to-side waves 133 The Edge-to-Edge Oscillations 135 POLE-ARM DESIGN THEORY 138 Impact Pole-arms 138 Quick and dirty head placement 141 Flipping the pole-arm around 142 Which hand determines the percussion point? 143 Iron Inlay Shaft Protection 143 THE CROSS-GUARD? 145 MEASURING THE PARAMETERS 148 The gravity pendulum method 148 The Torsion Pendulum Method 149 Impact Methods 149 FURTHER RESEARCH 151 4 Foreword Hand weapons are no longer well understood from a theoretical standpoint. Actually, it seems they are no longer understood at all. For all the talk about Rockwell hardness and charts of percussion point locations, one might think we know more about swords now than ever. This is blatantly not true. Despite hundreds of years of fencing, and scores of people studing the martial arts of the East, we almost certainly know less than the average knight did, and probably the average Greek hoplite. After the Atlanta 2001 conference, some talks with John Clements nagged at me, and I realized that there are some basic assumptions about the weapon, which have been passed down to us from prevoius writers, that just aren’t matching up with what’s now coming to light in his research. I searched the web for even basic information on the physics of swords, but from what few sources there are, I couldn’t even confirm that swords are swung in rotation. I thought that there would be a great deal of information from either the fencing, Eastern martial arts, or sword making communities, but came away empty handed. Well, actually I did find information, but most of it was either very simple or just plain wrong. Even the simple certainties were wrong, such as the sword’s center of percussion always being about a third back from the tip, which has turned out to be completely false. So, in frustration, I’ve had to figure out some weapon theory myself, even though I know but very little about swords or physics. So I’m no expert at this stuff, but from the looks of things no one else has seriously bothered with it either, at least since the early 1700’s. Interestingly, the only post 1600’s tool that I needed was just the concept of conservation of energy. Any competent 17th century researcher could’ve done everything else in this work, and apparently did so, if the Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society, circa 1660-1670, are any indication. So I’ve been bouncing ideas off John Clements, Matt Hauser, Richard Boswell, and G. Wade Johnson, all with ARMA, and here’s the result. Few of the results were anticipated, and the research has been a constant eye opener. I’m very irritated that someone hadn’t done this kind of work some time during the past two hundred years. As it requires nothing but the simplest Newtonian mechanics, or even pre-Newtonian mechanics, I can think of no excuse for neglecting it, other than most people being content with pat answers to complex questions. It is becoming obvious that if a modern reenactor were transported back to the 1600’s, both his sword and his explainations of it would meet with derisive laughter. But if you think the following are true, then this essay will present a startling different view of the sword. • Weight and balance point are the primary determinants of a sword’s feel. • The pommel is primarily used to balance the sword, setting the location for the center of mass. • The percussion point is well determined by striking the side of the blade, and is always about 1/3 of the blade length back from the tip. • Strikes with the percussion point leave the least vibration in the blade. • Strikes with the percussion point do the maximum damage, and leave no energy in the blade. • When struck, a sword will rotate around its center of mass. • The cross guard is primarily to protect your fingers. • Hand shock drains energy from the blow. • Heavier swords stike harder than light swords. This research makes use of simple high school algebra, but many of the most startling results require no math at all. After all, back then most swordsmen weren’t mathematicians, either. If you hate math please feel free to skip the math sections and look for the red underlined passages that highlight the findings. All the physics will be in the metric system just to keep the 5 units simple. I will, however, also give a measure called “the moment of inertia” in English units, as it’s as fundamental to a sword as mass is, and can be used to communicate information about a sword’s feel over the web. In English units, the moment of inertia also matches up pretty well with the sword’s weight, which makes it easy to intuitively get an idea of how a sword will behave from just a verbal description. At several points in this article, I will bring up some commonly held but invalid beliefs that are circulating in some parts of the sword community. This is done to examine preconceived, but invalid, notions in detail. Unless they are closely scrutinized they will continue to circulate in the back of your mind, popping up to provide a misunderstanding of what you are both seeing and feeling in your practice. I will also bring up some other intuitive ideas that don’t necessarily match up with reality, but might bring some insight into what ancient smiths and swordsmen may have thought was happening in a blow. Then again, they may have truly known what happens, since they had so much empircal information to work with. Notation used in this article Symbol Meaning Units m mass kg COM center of mass I moment of inertia kg-m2 2 ICOM moment of inertia calculated kg-m around the center of mass 2 IX moment of inertia calculated kg-m around the point at x H angular momentum kg-m2/sec F force newtons (newton = 1kg-m/sec2) Γ gamma, torque newton meters (N-m) a acceleration m/sec2 v velocity m/sec s distance m α alpha, angular acceleration radians/sec2 ω omega, angular velocity radians/sec θ theta, angle radians 6 Chapter 1 Moment of Inertia A sword has many physical properties that can’t be fudged, such as mass. If your replica weighs significantly more or less than the original, it will not handle the same. A heavier sword is harder to accelerate and decelerate in thrusting. Another physical property is the location of the center of mass (COM). When multiplied by the sword’s mass this gives the moment of force required from your hand to counter accelerations perpendicular to the blade, including gravity. If you have a pair of 3-pound swords where one has twice the distance to the balance point as the other, it will take twice as much torque to keep it pointed straight ahead when you shift it side to side. It will also take twice the torque from your forearms to hold it level against the force of gravity. A third parameter is called the moment of inertia (MOI), a more complicated, yet still fundamental measure.
Recommended publications
  • The Cavé in French Swordsmanship Patrick T
    COLUMBIACLASSICALFENCING.COM The Cavé in French Swordsmanship Patrick T. Morgan Introduction French fencing masters wrote about the cavé (pronounced cahv-ay) as a distinct fencing action. In French, caver means to cave in or collapse. The cavé thus described how a fencer would change or position his wrist or body to create a sharp angle—“caving in” from, say, a straightened position— for a specific fencing purpose, whether offensive or defensive. Sensibly, then, the cavé is sometimes referred to as angulation today. But that term doesn’t always cover all the ways the French writers used the cavé. This is because, as explained below, you can also cavé by using no angulation. Three General Ways to Cavé For the French, there were three ways to cavé. From the on-guard position, you could cavé (1) at the hips or (2) with your rear leg. You could also (3) cavé the wrist of your sword arm, which itself was possible in three different ways. These methods were variously defensive or offensive. Importantly, these were not recommendations so much as taxonomy: as we’ll see, some of these ways of “cavé-ing” could get you killed. 1. The Cavé at the Hips Danet discussed the “cavation” of the body in the second volume of L’Art des Armes. The cavé of the hips is one of two types of esquive—that is, a movement or displacement of the fencer’s target area to evade a thrust—that Danet identified. As Danet described it, the cavé at the hips occurs by “lowering the shoulders and completely straightening the right knee” (en baissant les épaules, & dépliant tout-à- fait le genou droit).
    [Show full text]
  • Eye of the Condor
    June 2008 Knife World Page 1 Eye of the Condor The Multi Knife is a distinctive knife with many good features. It is well made and very sharp. built a production facility wide. sible for the design and in Santa Ana, El Salvador. For the most part, development of the Many of the employees Imacasa has sold tools and Condor line. The tools and by Bob Campbell engineer who left were trained in Germany knives to American hard- knives are well made of Sometimes the history Messerschmitt in the on the new state of the art ware stores on the low bid. good material, and they of a tool or implement is as 1930s to come to America. machinery and a number But a few years ago, the oer a distinctive style interesting as the tool Likewise, this South are still at work there company introduced an that is geometrically itself. Such is the case American knife company after forty years or more. interesting and distinctive sound while oering visu- with the Condor knives. was founded by a German Today the company works line of knives. Respected al appeal. Knife geometry Condor Tool and Knife’s sword manufacturer. I had three shifts, shipping cutlery and tool designer appears simple – present parent company, Imacasa no idea, and the research knives and tools world Arlan D. Lothe is respon- Continued on page 2 of Costa Rica, has such a was very interesting. history. Just last week I Gebr. Weyersberg learned that the great Company was founded in British-American eort Solingen, Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • File Identification Chart
    FILE IDENTIFICATION CHART American Pattern Swiss Pattern American Flat File — Rectangular cross section. Tapered point. Double cut top and bottom. Swiss Pattern Files have more exacting measurements and finer cuts ranging from № 00 to Single-cut edges. Special tooth construction eliminates clogging. All sizes have the same number 6. Used by tool and die makers, jewellers, modellers, craftspeople and hobbyists. Available in the of teeth. 6" – 12" long. following types and length: American Flat File Aluminum Half-Round File — Rounded on one side, flat on the other. Tapered point. • Half Round File — № 00, 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4. 4" – 10" long. Double-cut. Special tooth construction eliminates clogging. All sizes have the same number of teeth. • Hand File — № 00, 0, 1, 2 and 4. 4" – 10" long. Aluminum Half-Round File Smooth finish. 6" – 12" long. • Knife File — № 00, 0, 1, 2 and 4. 4" – 8" long. Flat File — Rectangular cross section. Tapered point. Double-cut top and bottom. Single-cut • Round File — № 00, 0 and 2. 4" – 10" long. Flat File edges. Bastard, second and smooth cuts. For rapid stock removal. 4" – 16" long. • Round Straight File — № 0. 4", 6" and 8" long. Half-Round File — Rounded one side, flat on the other. Double-cut top and bottom. Bastard, second and smooth cuts. For filing concave, convex and flat surfaces. 4" – 15" long. • Square File — № 00, 0 and 2. 4", 6" and 8" long. Half-Round File Hand File — Rectangular cross section. Double-cut top and bottom. One safe edge and one • Three Square File — № 00, 0, 1 and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom of Artemisia
    Kingdom of Artemisia Historical Combat Reproduction Standards Book in and for the Kingdom of Artemisia 1 Historical Combat Reproduction Standards Book in and for the Kingdom of Artemisia This Standards book has been issued by the Office of the Minister of Arts and Sci- ences after review and approval by the Crown of Artemisia as well as the Office of the Earl Marshal in and for the Kingdom of Artemisia. ISSUE DATE RESPONSIBLE PARTIES DESCRIPTION ___________ Ld. Marten Claessen van ORIGINAL Ruyssevelt READ AND APPROVED _____________________________ ______________________________ REX ARTEMISIA REGINA ARTEMISIA ___________________________ _____________________________ MINISTER OF ARTS AND EARL MARSHAL ARTEMISIA SCIENCES ARTEMISIA 2 Table of Contents Page number Provenance ……………………………………… 2 Table of Contents ……………………………………… 3 Overview ………………………………………. 4-5 Historical Combat Studies ……………………………………… 6- 15 Appendix (Terms) …………...…………………………… 16-17 3 The Society for Creative Anachronism provides, in its Mission Statement: The Society for Creative Anachronism provides a structure for enthusiasts of the Middle Ages and Renaissance to explore various aspects of the period in Europe to 1600 AD. As accurately as possible, the SCA’s members strive to adopt the lifestyle, culture, technology, clothing and accoutrements common to those liv- ing during the time under study. The SCA encourages members to learn by doing, to research period arts, sciences and activities, to share their knowledge with oth- ers, and to behave in a chivalrous manner in all their interactions. The goals of Historical Combat Study and Education in the Kingdom of Ar- temisia are summarized by the following Articles: ARTICLE 1 OBJECTIVE OF HISTORIAL COMBAT STUDIES Through study and training in the historical martial arts, members seek to build their character, enhance their sense of judgment, and become disciplined individu- als capable of making contributions to the further Glory of Artemisia and to pro- mote the mission of the SCA.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules and Options
    Rules and Options The author has attempted to draw as much as possible from the guidelines provided in the 5th edition Players Handbooks and Dungeon Master's Guide. Statistics for weapons listed in the Dungeon Master's Guide were used to develop the damage scales used in this book. Interestingly, these scales correspond fairly well with the values listed in the d20 Modern books. Game masters should feel free to modify any of the statistics or optional rules in this book as necessary. It is important to remember that Dungeons and Dragons abstracts combat to a degree, and does so more than many other game systems, in the name of playability. For this reason, the subtle differences that exist between many firearms will often drop below what might be called a "horizon of granularity." In D&D, for example, two pistols that real world shooters could spend hours discussing, debating how a few extra ounces of weight or different barrel lengths might affect accuracy, or how different kinds of ammunition (soft-nosed, armor-piercing, etc.) might affect damage, may be, in game terms, almost identical. This is neither good nor bad; it is just the way Dungeons and Dragons handles such things. Who can use firearms? Firearms are assumed to be martial ranged weapons. Characters from worlds where firearms are common and who can use martial ranged weapons will be proficient in them. Anyone else will have to train to gain proficiency— the specifics are left to individual game masters. Optionally, the game master may also allow characters with individual weapon proficiencies to trade one proficiency for an equivalent one at the time of character creation (e.g., monks can trade shortswords for one specific martial melee weapon like a war scythe, rogues can trade hand crossbows for one kind of firearm like a Glock 17 pistol, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Fencing - Overview Fencing Is a Game in Which Is Played Between Two Fencers
    COMPILED BY : - GAUTAM SINGH STUDY MATERIAL – SPORTS 0 7830294949 Fencing - Overview Fencing is a game in which is played between two fencers. Both the fencers use swords to attack the opponent and to defend self. There are some rules and regulations which the players have to follow while attacking or defending. Three different groups of weapons are used in fencing and each weapon has its own set of rules and regulations. Most of the fencers select one so as to specialise in using any one of these weapons. This is a sword exerting game where two fencers try to touch each other with the tip of their sword. The main objective of this game is to touch the other player and score enough points required to win the game before the opposite player scores points. There are different approved target zones based on the weapon used and players have to touch those target zones to score points. A Brief History of Fencing Fencing was initiated in the 12th century though the oldest surviving manual on swordsmanship dates around 1300. In ancient days in Rome and Egypt, fencing was quite popular and was an essential part of life in the form of swordsmanship. In the middle age, i.e. around 1400, the use of armours was introduced in order to make the game more defensive and interesting. THANKS FOR READING – VISIT OUR WEBSITE www.educatererindia.com COMPILED BY : - GAUTAM SINGH STUDY MATERIAL – SPORTS 0 7830294949 Spain was the first one to practice fencing. Several books related to fencing have been written by Spanish authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Fencing: a Modern Sport
    Fencing: A Modern Sport (Recreated from the document that formerly resided on the USFA website [and we would link to it if it was still available on the USFA site!]) The sport of fencing is fast and athletic, a far cry from the choreographed bouts you see on film or on the stage. Instead of swinging from a chandelier or leaping from balconies, you will see two fencers performing an intense dance on a 6-feet by 44-feet strip. The movement is so fast the touches are scored electrically – a lot more like Star Wars than Errol Flynn. The Bout Competitors win a fencing bout (what an individual “game” is called) by being the first to score 15 points (in direct elimination play) or 5 points (in preliminary pool play) against their opponent, or by having a higher score than their opponent when the time limit expires. Each time a fencer lands a valid hit – a touch - on their opponent, they receive one point. The time limit for direct elimination matches is nine minutes - three three-minute periods with a one minute break between each. Fencers are penalized for crossing the lateral boundaries of the strip, while retreating off the rear limit of their side results in a touch awarded to their opponent. Team matches feature three fencers squaring off against another team of three in a "relay" format. Each team member fences every member of the opposing team in sequence over 9 rounds until one team reaches 45 touches or has the higher score when time expires in the final round.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerald Boggs' Wood Chisel
    Gerald Boggs' Wood Chisel Wood Chisel My bar of O-1 is 1-inch wide by ¼-inch thick, and I use By: Gerald Boggs, Virginia about a 1-inch length of it to laminate on to the blade of the chisel to make the edge material. A couple of years ago, I journeyed over to the West Coast to spend some time working on wooden boats. I was re- Hot cutting the O-1 from the bar gives me a chamfer quired to bring a number of hand tools with me, this chisel on the end of the bar which is incorporated into the scarf was one of them. Fig. 1 for forge welding onto the mild steel blade. Fig. 3 Typically, the handle of a wood chisel can be attached Once I have cut the O-1 to to the body by a tang or by a length and hot rasped or ground socket. I am showing the tang the end to an angle that I think method in this article. will help with the forge weld (scarf) I like to keep it warm by The body of the chisel is made the side of the fire as I prepare from mild steel with a piece of the other piece of the chisel. O-1 laminated on for the edge A 1-inch wide wood chisel made from mild steel with material. Fig. 2 Use a 4½-inch length of an O-1 tool steel edge ¾-inch diameter hot rolled steel I prefer to have my O-1 mate- for the base material.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Rules and Regulations
    Competition Rules and Regulations as at 1 January 2017 4 COMPETITION RULES - 01 GENERAL ASPECTS COMPETITION UIPM COMPETITION RULES AND REGULATIONS as at 1 January 2017 table of CONTENTS COMPETITION RULES 01MP - General Aspects Pg. 6 02MP - Fencing Pg. 30 03MP - Swimming Pg. 52 04MP - Riding Pg. 62 05MP - Laser-Run Pg. 80 06UIPM - Biathle Pg. 108 07UIPM - Triathle Pg. 116 EQUIPMENT REGULATIONS 01MP - General Aspects Pg. 123 02MP - Fencing Pg. 124 03MP - Swimming Pg. 138 04MP - Riding Pg. 140 05MP - Laser-Run Pg. 144 6 COMPETITION RULES - 01 GENERAL ASPECTS COMPETITION 01 GENERAL ASPECTS ABBREVIATIONS BAD Business Affairs Delegate NF National Federation CCh Continental Championships NTO National Technical Observer CISM Conseil Internationale du OG Olympic Games Sport Militaire PWR Pentathlon World Ranking EB Executive Board TC Technical Committee FOP Field of Play TD Technical Delegate HQ Headquarters TM Technical Meeting IJ International Judges UIPM Union Internationale de IOC International Olympic Pentathlon Moderne Committee WCC World Cup Competition LOC Local Organising Committee WCF World Cup Final Mins minutes WCh World Championships MD Medical Delegate YOG Youth Olympic Games MP Modern Pentathlon UIPM COMPETITION RULES AND REGULATIONS as at 1 January 2017 7 PART A MODERN PENTATHLON - CONTENTS COMPETITION RULES - 01 GENERAL ASPECTS COMPETITION 1.1 SPHERE OF APPLICATION 1.2 1 Age Groups 2 Calculating age AGE GROUPS 1.3 1 The Five Disciplines 2 Disciplines in Youth Competitions THE EVENTS 1.4 1 The Official UIPM Competitions in 3 OG
    [Show full text]
  • Combat Manual
    ADRIAN EMPIRE IMPERIAL ESTATES WRIT #17 COMBAT MANUAL ADOPTED JULY 2002 LAST UPDATED DECEMBER 2019, EFFECTIVE 1 JANUARY 2020 ©Copyright 1993-2020 The Adrian Empire, Inc. All rights reserved. Adria is a registered trade name of the Adrian Empire, Inc. Anyone is welcome to point out any error or omission that they may find. Adrian Empire – IEW #17 – Combat Manual Page 2 of 35 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL RULES AND REQUIREMENTS ....................................................... 5 A. HEALTH ......................................................................................................................................... 5 B. INHERENT DANGERS ................................................................................................................ 5 C. PROOF OF QUALIFICATION ................................................................................................... 5 D. MINIMUM AGES .......................................................................................................................... 5 E. GENERAL RULES OF COMBAT .............................................................................................. 5 1. Safety ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Marshals Must Be Present ............................................................................................................ 5 3. Entering the List Field .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Knives 2019 Amoureux—Armour
    custom knifemakers ABEGG—AMOS Uses stainless, salvage wrought iron, brass and copper for fi ttings. Handle materials A include stabilized and natural domestic and exotic fi gured woods, durable synthetics, ABEGG, ARNIE stacked leather. Makes own sheaths. Prices: $300 and up. Remarks: Part-time maker. 5992 Kenwick Cr, Huntington Beach, CA 92648, Phone: 714-848-5697 First knife sold in 2013. Doing business as Aldrich Knife & Tool. Emphasis put on clean ABERNATHY, LANCE lines, fi t and fi nish and performance. Mark: An arched ALDRICH. Sniper Bladeworks, 1924 Linn Ave., North Kansas City, MO 64116, Phone: 816-585- ALEXANDER, EUGENE 1595, [email protected]; Web: www.sniperbladeworks.com Box 540, Ganado, TX 77962-0540, Phone: 512-771-3727 Specialties: Tactical frame-lock and locking-liner folding knives. Alexander,, Oleg, and Cossack Blades ACCAWI, FUAD 15460 Stapleton Way, Wellington, FL 33414, Phone: 443-676-6111, Web: www. 130 Timbercrest Dr., Oak Ridge, TN 37830, Phone: 865-414-4836, gaccawi@ cossackblades.com comcast.net; Web: www.acremetalworks.com Technical: All knives are made from hand-forged Damascus (3-4 types of steel are used to Specialties: I create one of a kind pieces from small working knives to performance create the Damascus) and have a HRC of 60-62. Handle materials are all natural, including blades and swords. Patterns: Styles include, and not limited to hunters, Bowies, daggers, various types of wood, horn, bone and leather. Embellishments include the use of precious swords, folders and camp knives. Technical: I forge primarily 5160, produces own metals and stones, including gold, silver, diamonds, rubies, sapphires and other unique Damascus and does own heat treating.
    [Show full text]
  • Tutorial on Gravitational Pendulum Theory Applied to Seismic Sensing of Translation and Rotation by Randall D
    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 99, No. 2B, pp. –, May 2009, doi: 10.1785/0120080163 Tutorial on Gravitational Pendulum Theory Applied to Seismic Sensing of Translation and Rotation by Randall D. Peters Abstract Following a treatment of the simple pendulum provided in Appendix A, a rigorous derivation is given first for the response of an idealized rigid compound pendulum to external accelerations distributed through a broad range of frequencies. It is afterward shown that the same pendulum can be an effective sensor of rotation, if the axis is positioned close to the center of mass. Introduction When treating pendulum motions involving a noniner- in the sense that restoration is due to the gravitational field tial (accelerated) reference frame, physicists rarely consider of the Earth at its surface, little g. Some other instruments the dynamics of anything other than a simple pendulum. common in physics and sometimes labeled pendulums do Seismologists are concerned, however, with both instruments not employ a restore-to-equilibrium torque based on the more complicated than the simple pendulum and how such Earth’s field. For example, restoration in the Michell– instruments behave when their framework experiences accel- Cavendish balance that is used to measure big G (Newtonian eration in the form of either translation or rotation. Thus, I universal gravitational constant) is provided by the elastic look at the idealized compound pendulum as the simplest twist of a fiber (TEL-Atomic, Inc., 2008). It is sometimes approximation to mechanical system dynamics of relevance called a torsion pendulum. Many seismic instruments are to seismology.
    [Show full text]