The Regulation of Pork Barrelling in Australia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Regulation of Pork Barrelling in Australia 2 AUSTRALASIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP (ASPG) AND THE AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW (APR) The APR is the official journal of ASPG, which was formed in 1978 for the PurPose of encouraging and stimulating research, writing and teaching about Parliamentary institutions in Australia, New Zealand and the South Pacific (see back Page for Notes to Contributors to the journal and details of AGPS membershiP, which includes a subscriPtion to APR). To know more about the ASPG, including its Executive membership and its Chapters, go to www.asPg.org.au AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW Editor: Professor Rodney Smith, University of Sydney. Email: [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD Dr Peter Aimer, University of Auckland Dr Harry PhilliPs, Parliament of Western Australia Jennifer Aldred, Public and Regulatory Policy Dr StePhen Redenbach, Parliament of Victoria Consultant Dr Paul Reynolds, Parliament of Queensland Dr David Clune, University of Sydney Kirsten Robinson, Parliament of Western Australia Dr Ken Coghill, Monash University Kevin Rozzoli, University of Sydney Professor Brian Costar, Swinburne University of Professor Cheryl Saunders, University of Melbourne Technology Emeritus Professor Marian Sawer, Australian National Dr Jennifer Curtin, University of Auckland University Dr Gareth Griffith, NSW Parliamentary Library Professor Marian Simms, Deakin University Professor John Halligan, University of Canberra Dr Robyn Smith, Parliament of the Northern Territory Associate Professor Graham Hassall, Victoria Dr David Solomon, former Queensland Integrity University of Wellington Commissioner Dr Richard Herr, University of Tasmania Dr Katrin Steinack, University of Melbourne Professor Bryan Horrigan, Monash University Dr Elaine ThomPson, University of New South Wales Professor Helen Irving, University of Sydney Wayne Tunnecliffe, Parliament of Victoria Dr Rosemary Laing, Australian Senate Professor Anne Twomey, University of Sydney Adjunct Professor Colleen Lewis, Monash University Dr June Verrier, former Head, Australion Parliament Dr Clement MacIntyre, University of Adelaide Information and Research Services Dr Isla MacPhail, Parliament of Western Australia Professor George Williams, University of New South Professor Raymond Miller, University of Auckland Wales Professor Graeme Orr, University of Queensland Australasian Parliamentary Review WINTER/SPRING 2020 • VOL 35 NO 1 Table of Contents From the Editor 5 Rodney Smith 5 ARTICLES 7 Powers of Fiji’s Head of State: Some Considerations on the 50th Anniversary of Fiji’s IndePendence* 8 Richard Herr 8 The Regulation of Pork Barrelling in Australia* 24 Susanna Connolly 24 Queensland’s Scrutiny of ProPosed Legislation by Parliamentary Committees: Do They Make for More Considered, Rights-ComPatible Law?* 54 Lynda Pretty 54 The Franking Credits Controversy: House of RePresentatives Committees, Public Engagement and the Role of the Parliamentary Service* 77 Emma Banyer 77 Parliamentary Privilege, Search Warrants and Intrusive Powers: Are Memoranda of Understanding Fit For PurPose?* 111 Rebecca Burton 111 A Funny Thing HapPened on the Way to the National Cabinet—Out Goes Good Policy, One, Two, Three* 141 Scott Prasser 141 BOOK REVIEWS 157 Neville Wran. Australian Biographical Monographs No. 5, by David Clune. Cleveland (Qld): Connor Court Publishing, 2020. PP. 80, Paperback RRP $19.95 ISBN: 9781922449092 158 4 Elaine Thompson 158 The Fatal Lure of Politics: The Life and Thought of Vere Gordon Childe, by Terry Irving. Clayton: Monash University Publishing, 2020. PP. 424, Paperback RRP $39.95. ISBN: 978-1-925835-74-8 163 David Clune 163 * Indicates that the article has been double-blind reviewed. AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW 5 From the Editor Rodney Smith Professor of Australian Politics, University of Sydney This issue of the Australasian Parliamentary Review continues the emPhasis of the last issue in Presenting serious analysis of current issues related to Parliament. In the first article in this issue, Richard Herr uses the oPPortunity Presented by the recent 50th anniversary of Fijian indePendence to deliver a critical analysis of the further adaption of the Westminster model to the Fijian context in the 2013 Constitution. He focuses Particularly on relations between the Head of State and the Parliament, arguing that the 2013 Constitution has continued previous trends of diminishing the President’s exercise of reserve Powers via their codification and of increasing the Power of the Prime Minister over the Parliament. Given recent controversies over Pork barrelling in sPorts and community grants schemes at both the national and state level in Australia, Susanna Connolly’s detailed exPlanation of the current regulation of Pork barrelling is most timely. Following a systematic review that covers electoral bribery offences, financial legislation and regulations, administrative law, ministerial standards, caretaker conventions, oversight by the Auditor-General and media coverage, she concludes with some suggestions for imProving a regime that is ‘limited by the absence of sufficient enforcement mechanisms’. The next two articles focus on the roles of committees. Lynda Pretty analyses evidence on the current state of rights Protection via legislation and committee scrutiny in Queensland. She notes the imPossibility of effective rights Protection when governments use their majorities in Queensland’s Legislative Assembly to avoid committee scrutiny in the name of urgency—a Practice that began before Covid 19 and has continued through the Pandemic resPonse—but also the Potential of proper committee scrutiny for develoPing a more rights aware Political culture in the sunshine State. Queensland’s unicameral Parliament has, of course, just begun its first fixed four-year Parliamentary term with the election of a majority government led by Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk. The damaging effects of excessive PartisanshiP and time Pressures on committee work are also central themes of Emma Banyer’s analysis of the House of RePresentatives Standing Committee on Economics’ controversial 2018-19 inquiry into franking credits. Relating the inquiry to broader theories of Parliament, citizen VOL 35 NO 1 WINTER/SPRING 2020 6 ParticiPation and deliberation, Banyer notes that ‘the existing literature overlooks the specific role of the Parliamentary Service’ in Promoting ParticiPation and deliberation. She discusses this role and outlines a set of reform principles designed to avoid future ‘negative, maniPulative or ineffectual Public engagement’ by Parliamentary committees. Rebecca Burton considers recent instances of conflicts between the PrinciPle of Parliamentary Privilege and the integrity of investigations into criminal and corruPt acts required by the rule of law. DeveloPments in surveillance mechanisms, including access to electronic metadata, have heightened this issue. Burton reviews current memoranda of understanding between Parliaments and investigating agencies, arguing that … it is an oPPortune time to renegotiate existing memoranda of understanding to include Protocols covering more advanced investigative techniques and better safeguards to ensure material subject to Parliamentary Privilege is treated apProPriately. She concludes her article with a set of oPtions for imProving these memoranda. We conclude the articles by adding to the three articles by Jonathan O’Dea, StePhen Mills and Graeme Orr Published in the last issue of the Australasian Parliamentary Review on the imPact of Covid 19 on Parliamentary and related Politics. In this issue, Scott Prasser Presents a critical assessment of the genesis, early oPeration and future of the National Cabinet established by Prime Minister Scott Morrison in March this year. Prasser concludes that the National Cabinet has, among other things, ‘enhanced executive federalism’ and ‘extended executive Power’, while raising ‘real concerns about the value and constitutional standing of Parliament in the Australian Westminster model’. We hoPe to continue assessments of the imPact of Covid 19 resPonses on asPects of Parliament in future issues of the journal. AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW 7 Articles VOL 35 NO 1 WINTER/SPRING 2020 8 Powers of Fiji’s Head of State: Some Considerations on the 50th Anniversary of Fiji’s Independence* Richard Herr Academic Director, Parliamentary Law, Practice and Procedure Course, University of Tasmania. * Double-blind reviewed article. Abstract The Westminster model for Parliamentary democracy has served as the temPlate for one of the world’s most widely used forms of resPonsible government. The model owes its PoPularity to its cultural adaptiveness, which stems largely from the original model’s reliance on Pragmatic conventions to resolve fundamental constitutional disPutes. However, as Walter Bagehot noted 150 years ago, every rePlication can lead to ‘coPying errors’. Fiji’s 2013 constitution was intended to restore Fiji to Parliamentary democracy after the 2006 military couP. It has been controversial for many reasons including the significant changes it made to Previous iterations of the Westminster model over the 50 years since Fiji’s indePendence esPecially the 1997 constitution which was itself a consequence of a military couP. This article tests the relevance of Bagehot’s concerns in contemPorary Fiji as they apPear in the 2013 Constitution, with a focus on Head of State-Parliament relations. INTRODUCTION On October 10 2020, Fiji celebrated the fiftieth anniversary of its indePendence, although regrettably
Recommended publications
  • A History of Misconduct: the Case for a Federal Icac
    MISCONDUCT IN POLITICS A HISTORY OF MISCONDUCT: THE CASE FOR A FEDERAL ICAC INDEPENDENT JO URNALISTS MICH AEL WES T A ND CALLUM F OOTE, COMMISSIONED B Y G ETUP 1 MISCONDUCT IN POLITICS MISCONDUCT IN RESOURCES, WATER AND LAND MANAGEMENT Page 5 MISCONDUCT RELATED TO UNDISCLOSED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Page 8 POTENTIAL MISCONDUCT IN LOBBYING MISCONDUCT ACTIVITIES RELATED TO Page 11 INAPPROPRIATE USE OF TRANSPORT Page 13 POLITICAL DONATION SCANDALS Page 14 FOREIGN INFLUENCE ON THE POLITICAL PROCESS Page 16 ALLEGEDLY FRAUDULENT PRACTICES Page 17 CURRENT CORRUPTION WATCHDOG PROPOSALS Page 20 2 MISCONDUCT IN POLITICS FOREWORD: Trust in government has never been so low. This crisis in public confidence is driven by the widespread perception that politics is corrupt and politicians and public servants have failed to be held accountable. This report identifies the political scandals of the and other misuse of public money involving last six years and the failure of our elected leaders government grants. At the direction of a minister, to properly investigate this misconduct. public money was targeted at voters in marginal electorates just before a Federal Election, In 1984, customs officers discovered a teddy bear potentially affecting the course of government in in the luggage of Federal Government minister Australia. Mick Young and his wife. It had not been declared on the Minister’s customs declaration. Young This cheating on an industrial scale reflects a stepped aside as a minister while an investigation political culture which is evolving dangerously. into the “Paddington Bear Affair” took place. The weapons of the state are deployed against journalists reporting on politics, and whistleblowers That was during the prime ministership of Bob in the public service - while at the same time we Hawke.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexiest Politicians Get Vote | Herald Sun Page 1 of 2
    Sexiest politicians get vote | Herald Sun Page 1 of 2 Sexiest politicians get vote Ben Packham December 08, 2006 12:00am Article from: OUR best-looking politician is not even in Parliament ¿ and John Howard can thank his lucky stars for that. Nicole Campbell, who stood against the Prime Minister, was rated the most attractive candidate at the 2004 election. The Australian National University rated politicians using how-to-vote cards. It wasn't good news for Mr Howard – or Labor leader Kevin Rudd. Proving looks aren't everything, the PM came in 279 out of 286. Mr Rudd did marginally better at 244. But Julie Bishop can take a bow. She has the beauty to match her brainy portfolio. The Education Minister was the most attractive sitting female MP, at fifth overall. Victoria's best looker was newly crowned deputy Labor leader Julia Gillard at No. 12. Rising Liberal star Malcolm Turnbull ran a dapper 18th. Leadership rival Peter Costello (169) has plenty of ground to make up. He wouldn't even beat Kim Beazley (152) in a beauty contest. Health Minister Tony Abbott was rated not too shabby at 96 and Workplace Relations Minister Kevin Andrews was a respectable 114. Labor childcare spokeswoman Tanya Plibersek was looking good at 21, while Victoria's best- looking bloke was Flinders Lib MP Greg Hunt (55). Other highly rated Victorians included Labor member for Ballarat Catherine King (24), and member for Indi Sophie Mirabella (29). ANU's Andrew Leigh, who conducted the study, did not reveal who ran last because it would be unfair.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian 2013 Election: the Tribe Has Spoken
    Australian 2013 Election: The tribe has spoken Economic research note 9 September 2013 As widely expected, the Liberal/National Coalition has Australian election: The tribe has spoken easily won the Australian Federal election held over the Australians went to the polls over the weekend, voting on a weekend. full House of Representatives (150 seats) and a half Senate (76 The Coalition increased their seats in the Lower House seat) election. from 72 to a projected 89, easily giving them a strong majority. As widely expected ahead of the election and as signalled by a number of opinion polls, the election has resulted in a change In contrast, the number of seats held by the ALP dropped of government. to an estimated 57 from 71. The Liberal/National party coalition, led by new Prime Minister However, the new Senate, which does not sit until 1 July Tony Abbott has defeated the incumbent Australian Labor 2014, could be problematic for the Coalition, as there Party (ALP) minority government, led by Kevin Rudd. could be up to 8 Senators from smaller parties/Independents and up to 10 Greens. With swing of 4.1% away from the ALP, some of which went to smaller parties and Independents, the Coalition now looks With the Coalition likely to have 33 Senators, they will 1 need to secure the vote of 6 of the smaller party like they will hold 89 seats in the House of Representatives , Senators (or the ALP) to pass legislation. well up from their previous number of 72. This gives the Coalition a comfortable majority of 13 in the House (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Legisy.Ative Assembly
    2nd July, 1991 ASSEMBLY 23 LEGISY.ATIVE ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 2nd July, 1991 FIRST SESSION OF THE FIFTTIETH PARLIAMENT The House met at 10.30 a.m., pursuant to the proclamation of His Excellency the Governor. The Clerk read the proclamation. The Clerk announced that he had received a list, certified by His Excellency the Governor, of the names of the members to serve in this Parliament, together with the writs on which they bad been returned; with His Excellency's certification that the writs had been returned prior to the day by which they were by law returnable. OPENING OF SESSION The Usher of the Black Rod, being admitted; delivered a message from the Commissioners requesting the immediate attendance of this honourable House in the Legislative Council Chamber to hear the Commission for the opening of Parliament read. The House went, and members having returned, OATH OR AFFIRMATION OF ALLEGIANCE The Clerk informed the House that His Excellency the Governor had issued a Commission authorising the Hon. Nicholas Frank Greiner, the Hon. Wallace Telford John Murray and the Hon. Peter Edward James Collies to administer the oath or affirmation of allegiance to Her Majesty the Queen required by law to 6e taken or made by members of the Assembly. The Clerk read the Commission. MEMBERS SWORN All members, with the exception of Ms No I'I; took and subscribed the oath or affirmation of allegiance, and signed the roll. ELECTION OF SPEAKER Mr KERB (Cronulla) [11.19] : I move: That Kevin Richard Rozzoli do take the chair of this House as Speaker.
    [Show full text]
  • Ray Williams Inaugural Speech.Pdf
    Inaugural Speeches Inaugural Speeches Extract from NSW Legislative Assembly Hansard and Papers Wednesday 30 May 2007. Mr RAY WILLIAMS (Hawkesbury) [7.56 p.m.] (Inaugural Speech): Today I speak as the newly elected Liberal member for Hawkesbury. The Hawkesbury has been fortunate to have some outstanding representatives in its history. To Kevin Rozzoli, one of the most respected Speakers of this House, a member who worked tirelessly on behalf of the people of Hawkesbury, thank you. Your friendship and advice has been invaluable to me over the past six months, and I will work hard to emulate your record of service, your integrity and your loyalty to the Liberal Party. The electorate of Hawkesbury is adorned with hardworking traditional rural families combined with an abundance of younger aspirational families, many of whom moved to the electorate through the rapid growth of the Rouse Hill development. It is one of the rare places where one can walk through quiet, leafy, treelined rural streets and yet be a mere 35 minutes to the thriving metropolis of Sydney. I have lived and worked in the Hawkesbury electorate my entire life and my family have a very long association with this area dating back almost 200 years. Indeed, my ancestor and one of my original family descendents to this country, Robert Allen, arrived in Australia in 1796 and was given a land grant on Castle Hill Road, Castle Hill, in 1814. Robert Allen was sentenced to transportation as a political prisoner from Ireland and disembarked from the Marquis Cornwallis in Sydney Cove in 1796.
    [Show full text]
  • By the People, for the People? Community Participation in Law Reform November 2010
    access to justice and legal needs By the People, for the People? community ParticiPation in law reform november 2010 Access to Justice And LegAL needs Volume 6 By the People, for the People? c ommunity particiPAtion in law reform november 2010 natalina nheu & Hugh mcdonald LAw And Justice foundAtion of new soutH wALes ISSN 1832-2670 This report is part of the Access to Justice and Legal Needs monograph series published by the Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales. The Foundation seeks to advance the fairness and equity of the justice system, and to improve access to justice, especially for socially and economically disadvantaged people. The series is aimed at researchers, policy-makers, government, the legal community and others interested in legal need and access to law and justice. It is a scholarly, refereed series. Monographs are refereed by at least two appropriate external referees who are independent of the Foundation and any other organisations/authors involved in the publication. Managing Editor: Geoff Mulherin © Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales, November 2010 This publication is copyright. It may be reproduced in part or in whole for educational purposes as long as proper credit is given to the Foundation. Any opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation’s Board of Governors. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data: Author: Nheu, Natalina. Title: By the people, for the people?: community participation in law reform / Natalina Nheu & Hugh McDonald Edition: 1st ed. ISBN: 978 0 909136 93 2 (pbk.) Series: Access to justice and legal needs; v.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Morrison Government Ministry 29 June 2021 Overview
    Barton Deakin Brief: Second Morrison Government Ministry 29 June 2021 Overview Prime Minister Scott Morrison MP has announced his new Cabinet and Ministry following the change in The Nationals leadership. Cabinet Changes - Barnaby Joyce MP is the new Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development. Michael McCormack MP has been removed from the Cabinet and is now on the backbench. - David Littleproud MP retains his position as the Minster for Agriculture and is now also the Minister for Northern Australia. The role of Minister for Drought and Emergency Management will be given to Senator Bridget McKenzie. - Senator McKenzie will be returned to the Cabinet and is also the new Minister for Regionalisation, Regional Communications and Regional Education. - Keith Pitt MP, the Minister for Resources and Water will move to the outer Ministry, with his Northern Australia portfolio goes to David Littleproud MP. - Andrew Gee MP has been promoted to the Cabinet as the Minister for Defence Industry and Minister for Veterans’ Affairs. - Darren Chester MP, the former Minister for Veterans Affairs and Defence Personnel has been removed from the Cabinet and the Ministry. Ministry Changes - Mark Coulton MP, formerly the Minister for Regional Health, Regional Communications and Local Government is no longer a Minister. - Dr David Gillespie MP has become the Minister for Regional Health. For more information - The Ministry List from the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet For more information, contact David Alexander on +61 457 400 524, Grahame Morris on +61 411 222 680, Cheryl Cartwright on +61 419 996 066 or Jack de Hennin on +61 424 828 127.
    [Show full text]
  • The Most Vitriolic Parliament
    THE MOST VITRIOLIC PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE OF THE VITRIOLIC NATURE OF THE 43 RD PARLIAMENT AND POTENTIAL CAUSES Nicolas Adams, 321 382 For Master of Arts (Research), June 2016 The University of Melbourne, School of Social and Political Sciences Supervisors: Prof. John Murphy, Dr. Scott Brenton i Abstract It has been suggested that the period of the Gillard government was the most vitriolic in recent political history. This impression has been formed by many commentators and actors, however very little quantitative data exists which either confirms or disproves this theory. Utilising an analysis of standing orders within the House of Representatives it was found that a relatively fair case can be made that the 43rd parliament was more vitriolic than any in the preceding two decades. This period in the data, however, was trumped by the first year of the Abbott government. Along with this conclusion the data showed that the cause of the vitriol during this period could not be narrowed to one specific driver. It can be seen that issues such as the minority government, style of opposition, gender and even to a certain extent the speakership would have all contributed to any mutation of the tone of debate. ii Declaration I declare that this thesis contains only my original work towards my Masters of Arts (Research) except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text to other material used. Equally this thesis is fewer than the maximum word limit as approved by the Research Higher Degrees Committee. iii Acknowledgements I wish to acknowledge my two supervisors, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Name: Mark Fulford Submission: Over the Last 20 Or So Years, I Have
    Name: Mark Fulford Submission: Over the last 20 or so years, i have become increasingly concerned in regards to the nature of what I see in the media, print, tv or online. I always thought that the backbone of a healthy democracy and a fair go, is a free, balanced media, reporting the important news items to us, the people in a non- partisan, balanced manner. Unfortunately, quite often these days this is not what I see. I live in Victoria, and in the Herald-Sun in particular, I often see divisive, biased, inflammatory journalism, that appears to seek advantage, often political. A good example has been what I’d call an inflammatory, continuous campaign against our state premier, Daniel Andrews. Headlines in big letters reading “Dan made disaster”, or “Hotel hell”, suggesting the Premiers unproven guilt, in relation to issues around the quarantine of returning Australians from overseas. In reality, the Premier has allowed an IVAC investigation to take place in relation to the matter, and the resignation of the government minister concerned, has occurred. I note that our Prime Minister himself and various ministers from his cabinet, Michaelia Cash, Angus Taylor, Bridget McKenzie, Ken Wyatt amongst others, have all escaped such criticism in the Murdoch press. To me this smacks of bias. Bias, that unchecked, is and will continue to damage our democracy. The Australian people work and pay taxes in order to pay our politicians, they work for us. We as citizens need to be able to trust that our government looks after our interests too, and one of those, is to be informed without bias.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Chamber Seating Plan AS at 15 June 2020 Advisers President Advisers
    Senate Chamber Seating Plan AS AT 15 June 2020 Advisers President Advisers RYAN VIC/LP CLERK CHAIR DEPUTY Government Whips OF COMMITTEES CLERK Opposition Whips BLACK D. SMITH RUSTON K. GALLAGHER URQUHART LINES ROD WA/LP SA/LP ACT/ALP TAS/ALP WA/ALP McGRATH CASH KENEALLY CICCONE McCARTHY QLD/LP WA/LP NSW/ALP VIC/ALP NT/ALP BROCKMAN ABETZ PAYNE Ministers FARRELL KITCHING O'NEILL WA/LP TAS/LP NSW/LP BIRMINGHAM WONG SA/ALP VIC/ALP NSW/ALP SA/LP SA/ALP CHANDLER FIERRAVANTI-WELLS REYNOLDS Leader Leader WATT AYRES WALSH TAS/LP NSW/LP WA/LP QLD/ALP NSW/ALP VIC/ALP of the of the Government Opposition Shadow Ministers ANTIC FAWCETT COLBECK McALLISTER POLLEY CHISHOLM SA/LP SA/LP TAS/LP NSW/ALP TAS/ALP QLD/ALP HENDERSON PATERSON SESELJA BROWN GREEN CARR VIC/LP VIC/LP ACT/LP TAS/ALP QLD/ALP VIC/ALP RENNICK MOLAN HUME DODSON BILYK QLD/LP NSW/LP VIC/LP WA/ALP TAS/ALP VAN ASKEW DUNIAM STERLE SHELDON VIC/LP TAS/LP TAS/LP Hansard WA/ALP NSW/ALP Reporters McLACHLAN SCARR STOKER PRATT A. GALLACHER SA/LP QLD/LP QLD/LP WA/ALP SA/ALP SMALL HUGHES M. SMITH WA/LP NSW/LP SA/ALP BRAGG PATRICK NSW/LP LAMBIE TAS/JLN SA/IND O'SULLIVAN WA/LP GRIFF McKENZIE SIEWERT SA/CA VIC/NAT WA/AG DAVEY RICE NSW/NAT HANSON WATERS VIC/AG QLD/PHON CANAVAN QLD/AG McDONALD QLD/NAT WHISH-WILSON QLD/NAT TAS/AG HANSON-YOUNG ROBERTS McKIM SA/AG QLD/PHON McMAHON TAS/AG THORPE NT/CLP VIC/AG FARUQI STEELE-JOHN NSW/AG WA/AG Advisers Advisers Senate Office Holders & Ministerial Representation in the Senate 46th Parliament • 3 August 2021 • The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Senate Office Holders Senate Party Leaders President: Senator the Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Lord Mayoral Minute Page 1
    THE CITY OF NEWCASTLE Lord Mayoral Minute Page 1 SUBJECT: LMM 28/05/19 - FEDERAL ELECTION RESULTS MOTION That City of Newcastle: 1 Acknowledges the re-election of the Prime Minister, the Hon. Scott Morrsion MP, and the Federal Liberal National Government, following the 18 May 2019 poll; 2 Notes new and returning Ministerial portfolio responsibilities for a number of Minister’s with responsibility for policy regarding local government, including new Minister for Regional Services, Decentralisation and Local Government, the Hon. Mark Coulton MP, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development, the Hon. Michael McCormack MP and Minister for Population, Cities and Urban Infrastructure, the Hon. Alan Tudge MP; 3 Congratulates the following local Hunter Members of Parliament on their re-election: • Sharon Claydon MP, Federal Member for Newcastle • Pat Conroy MP, Federal Member for Shortland • Joel Fitzgibbon MP, Federal Member for Hunter • Meryl Swanson MP, Federal Member for Paterson 4 Commits to continuing our collaborative working relationship with the Federal Government and the Federal Labor Opposition for the benefit of the people of the City of Newcastle. BACKGROUND: Following the 2019 Federal election, the Morrison Liberal National Government has formed a majority government. Across Newcastle and the Hunter, all sitting Members of Parliament were returned to represent their communities in the nation’s Parliament. Australians have re-elected our Government to get back to work and get on with the job of delivering for all Australians as they go about their own lives, pursuing their goals and aspirations for themselves, their families and their communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Tweeting to Save the Furniture: the 2013 Australian Election Campaign on Twitter
    Tweeting to Save the Furniture: The 2013 Australian Election Campaign on Twitter Introduction Past years have seen continuing experimentation around the world in the use of online publishing and engagement technologies for political campaigning (Bruns et al., 2016). Australia, with its exceptionally short legislative periods of (nominally) three years at federal level, provides a particularly useful environment in which the transition towards increased online campaigning can be observed. This also traces the changing mix amongst the digital platforms: the online campaign of the 2007 federal election was overshadowed by the “blog wars” between conservative and progressive commentators over the correct interpretation of opinion poll results (Jericho, 2012; Bruns & Highfield, 2012), and the major parties also experimented with online videos posted to YouTube, with varying success (Bruns et al., 2007), but Facebook and Twitter did not yet feature in any significant way. By 2010, blog-style columns had been incorporated into mainstream online news platforms from The Australian to Crikey, and no longer played a distinct role in the campaign. Instead, following the widespread adoption of Facebook and (less strongly so) Twitter, and the role that such tools played in covering the Rudd/Gillard leadership spill earlier in the year (Posetti, 2010; Bruns & Burgess, 2015), parties, candidates, journalists, and commentators began to incorporate social media more fully into their campaigning activities (cf. Grant et al., 2010). However, in spite of the significant journalistic and scholarly attention paid to these developments, the still distinctively netizen- dominated userbase demographics of a platform such as Twitter also resulted in social media debates about the election that focussed largely on technology topics such as the proposed National Broadband Network and Internet filter.
    [Show full text]